Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

Article Types

Countries / Regions

Search Results (1)

Search Parameters:
Authors = Neha Gulab Singh

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
14 pages, 2372 KiB  
Article
iERM: An Interpretable Deep Learning System to Classify Epiretinal Membrane for Different Optical Coherence Tomography Devices: A Multi-Center Analysis
by Kai Jin, Yan Yan, Shuai Wang, Ce Yang, Menglu Chen, Xindi Liu, Hiroto Terasaki, Tun-Hang Yeo, Neha Gulab Singh, Yao Wang and Juan Ye
J. Clin. Med. 2023, 12(2), 400; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm12020400 - 4 Jan 2023
Cited by 32 | Viewed by 4537
Abstract
Background: Epiretinal membranes (ERM) have been found to be common among individuals >50 years old. However, the severity grading assessment for ERM based on optical coherence tomography (OCT) images has remained a challenge due to lacking reliable and interpretable analysis methods. Thus, this [...] Read more.
Background: Epiretinal membranes (ERM) have been found to be common among individuals >50 years old. However, the severity grading assessment for ERM based on optical coherence tomography (OCT) images has remained a challenge due to lacking reliable and interpretable analysis methods. Thus, this study aimed to develop a two-stage deep learning (DL) system named iERM to provide accurate automatic grading of ERM for clinical practice. Methods: The iERM was trained based on human segmentation of key features to improve classification performance and simultaneously provide interpretability to the classification results. We developed and tested iERM using a total of 4547 OCT B-Scans of four different commercial OCT devices that were collected from nine international medical centers. Results: As per the results, the integrated network effectively improved the grading performance by 1–5.9% compared with the traditional classification DL model and achieved high accuracy scores of 82.9%, 87.0%, and 79.4% in the internal test dataset and two external test datasets, respectively. This is comparable to retinal specialists whose average accuracy scores are 87.8% and 79.4% in two external test datasets. Conclusion: This study proved to be a benchmark method to improve the performance and enhance the interpretability of the traditional DL model with the implementation of segmentation based on prior human knowledge. It may have the potential to provide precise guidance for ERM diagnosis and treatment. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue State-of-the-Art Research on Vitreoretinal Disorders)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop