Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline

Journals

Article Types

Countries / Regions

Search Results (2)

Search Parameters:
Authors = Keith C. Allberg

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
9 pages, 1313 KiB  
Article
Simultaneous Estimation of Bias and Resolution in PET Images with a Long-Lived “Pocket” Phantom System
by Paul E. Kinahan, Darrin W. Byrd, Brian Helba, Kristen A. Wangerin, Xiaoxiao Liu, Joshua R. Levy, Keith C. Allberg, Karthik Krishnan and Ricardo S. Avila
Tomography 2018, 4(1), 33-41; https://doi.org/10.18383/j.tom.2018.00004 - 1 Mar 2018
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 1027
Abstract
A challenge in multicenter trials that use quantitative positron emission tomography (PET) imaging is the often unknown variability in PET image values, typically measured as standardized uptake values, introduced by intersite differences in global and resolution-dependent biases. We present a method for the [...] Read more.
A challenge in multicenter trials that use quantitative positron emission tomography (PET) imaging is the often unknown variability in PET image values, typically measured as standardized uptake values, introduced by intersite differences in global and resolution-dependent biases. We present a method for the simultaneous monitoring of scanner calibration and reconstructed image resolution on a per-scan basis using a PET/computed tomography (CT) “pocket” phantom. We use simulation and phantom studies to optimize the design and construction of the PET/CT pocket phantom (120 × 30 × 30 mm). We then evaluate the performance of the PET/CT pocket phantom and accompanying software used alongside an anthropomorphic phantom when known variations in global bias (±20%, ±40%) and resolution (3-, 6-, and 12-mm postreconstruction filters) are introduced. The resulting prototype PET/CT pocket phantom design uses 3 long-lived sources (15-mm diameter) containing germanium-68 and a CT contrast agent in an epoxy matrix. Activity concentrations varied from 30 to 190 kBq/mL. The pocket phantom software can accurately estimate global bias and can detect changes in resolution in measured phantom images. The pocket phantom is small enough to be scanned with patients and can potentially be used on a per-scan basis for quality assurance for clinical trials and quantitative PET imaging in general. Further studies are being performed to evaluate its performance under variations in clinical conditions that occur in practice. Full article
8 pages, 1097 KiB  
Article
Evaluation of Cross-Calibrated 68Ge/68Ga Phantoms for Assessing PET/CT Measurement Bias in Oncology Imaging for Single- and Multicenter Trials
by Darrin W. Byrd, Robert K. Doot, Keith C. Allberg, Lawrence R. MacDonald, Wendy A. McDougald, Brian F. Elston, Hannah M. Linden and Paul E. Kinahan
Tomography 2016, 2(4), 353-360; https://doi.org/10.18383/j.tom.2016.00205 - 1 Dec 2016
Cited by 19 | Viewed by 1136
Abstract
Quantitative PET imaging is an important tool for clinical trials evaluating the response of cancers to investigational therapies. The standardized uptake value, used as a quantitative imaging biomarker, is dependent on multiple parameters that may contribute bias and variability. The use of long-lived, [...] Read more.
Quantitative PET imaging is an important tool for clinical trials evaluating the response of cancers to investigational therapies. The standardized uptake value, used as a quantitative imaging biomarker, is dependent on multiple parameters that may contribute bias and variability. The use of long-lived, sealed PET calibration phantoms offers the advantages of known radioactivity activity concentration and simpler use than aqueous phantoms. We evaluated scanner and dose calibrator sources from two batches of commercially available kits, together at a single site and distributed across a local multicenter PET imaging network. We found that radioactivity concentration was uniform within the phantoms. Within the regions of interest drawn in the phantom images, coefficients of variation of voxel values were less than 2%. Across phantoms, coefficients of variation for mean signal were close to 1%. Biases of the standardized uptake value estimated with the kits varied by site and were seen to change in time by approximately ±5%. We conclude that these biases cannot be assumed constant over time. The kits provide a robust method to monitor PET scanner and dose calibrator biases, and resulting biases in standardized uptake values. Full article
Back to TopTop