Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

Article Types

Countries / Regions

Search Results (2)

Search Parameters:
Authors = Judith Burstin

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
6 pages, 621 KiB  
Review
The Taxonomic Status of Genera within the Fabeae (Vicieae), with a Special Focus on Pisum
by T. H. Noel Ellis, Petr Smýkal, Nigel Maxted, Clarice J. Coyne, Claire Domoney, Judith Burstin, Yanis Bouchenak-Khelladi and Noam Chayut
Diversity 2024, 16(7), 365; https://doi.org/10.3390/d16070365 - 26 Jun 2024
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 2238
Abstract
The taxonomy of the tribe Fabeae (Vicieae) has long been problematic, but an analysis by Schaefer et al. in 2012 gave an exceptionally clear view of the tribe and noted the possibility that some nomenclatural adjustments may be required at some future date. [...] Read more.
The taxonomy of the tribe Fabeae (Vicieae) has long been problematic, but an analysis by Schaefer et al. in 2012 gave an exceptionally clear view of the tribe and noted the possibility that some nomenclatural adjustments may be required at some future date. These authors suggested several options, expressing some preferences. However, there has been a recent change to formally accepted names, implementing one of these possibilities, but without any additional relevant information. This change seems unjustified and unhelpful. We therefore present an argument for the retention, or re-instatement, of the genera Pisum, Vavilovia, and Lens until such time as new data support this requirement and there is no nomenclatural solution that is both accurate and convenient. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Systematics, Phylogeny, and Biogeography of Leguminosae)
Show Figures

Figure 1

42 pages, 2819 KiB  
Review
Pea (Pisum sativum L.) in the Genomic Era
by Petr Smýkal, Gregoire Aubert, Judith Burstin, Clarice J. Coyne, Noel T. H. Ellis, Andrew J. Flavell, Rebecca Ford, Miroslav Hýbl, Jiří Macas, Pavel Neumann, Kevin E. McPhee, Robert J. Redden, Diego Rubiales, Jim L. Weller and Tom D. Warkentin
Agronomy 2012, 2(2), 74-115; https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy2020074 - 4 Apr 2012
Cited by 189 | Viewed by 45679
Abstract
Pea (Pisum sativum L.) was the original model organism used in Mendel’s discovery (1866) of the laws of inheritance, making it the foundation of modern plant genetics. However, subsequent progress in pea genomics has lagged behind many other plant species. Although the [...] Read more.
Pea (Pisum sativum L.) was the original model organism used in Mendel’s discovery (1866) of the laws of inheritance, making it the foundation of modern plant genetics. However, subsequent progress in pea genomics has lagged behind many other plant species. Although the size and repetitive nature of the pea genome has so far restricted its sequencing, comprehensive genomic and post genomic resources already exist. These include BAC libraries, several types of molecular marker sets, both transcriptome and proteome datasets and mutant populations for reverse genetics. The availability of the full genome sequences of three legume species has offered significant opportunities for genome wide comparison revealing synteny and co-linearity to pea. A combination of a candidate gene and colinearity approach has successfully led to the identification of genes underlying agronomically important traits including virus resistances and plant architecture. Some of this knowledge has already been applied to marker assisted selection (MAS) programs, increasing precision and shortening the breeding cycle. Yet, complete translation of marker discovery to pea breeding is still to be achieved. Molecular analysis of pea collections has shown that although substantial variation is present within the cultivated genepool, wild material offers the possibility to incorporate novel traits that may have been inadvertently eliminated. Association mapping analysis of diverse pea germplasm promises to identify genetic variation related to desirable agronomic traits, which are historically difficult to breed for in a traditional manner. The availability of high throughput ‘omics’ methodologies offers great promise for the development of novel, highly accurate selective breeding tools for improved pea genotypes that are sustainable under current and future climates and farming systems. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Impact of Genomics Technologies on Crop Breeding Strategies)
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

Back to TopTop