Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

Article Types

Countries / Regions

Search Results (7)

Search Parameters:
Authors = George Fotakopoulos ORCID = 0000-0002-2491-2886

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
13 pages, 1526 KiB  
Article
Quality of Life, Family Support, Spirometry, and 6-Minute Walking Distance Differences between COVID-19 and Non-COVID-19 Intensive Care Unit Patients in One Year Following Hospital Discharge
by Konstantina Avgeri, Konstantinos Mantzarlis, Effrosyni Gerovasileiou, Konstantina Deskata, Maria Chatzi, George Fotakopoulos, Markos Sgantzos, Vasiliki Tsolaki, Epaminondas Zakynthinos and Demosthenes Makris
Healthcare 2024, 12(10), 996; https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare12100996 - 13 May 2024
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 1293
Abstract
Background: Critically ill patients after Intensive Care Unit (ICU) discharge may present disability in their cognitive and physical functions. Objectives: To investigate the quality of life (QoL) of both COVID-19 and non-COVID-19 patients following ICU discharge, lung function, and physical performance of participants. [...] Read more.
Background: Critically ill patients after Intensive Care Unit (ICU) discharge may present disability in their cognitive and physical functions. Objectives: To investigate the quality of life (QoL) of both COVID-19 and non-COVID-19 patients following ICU discharge, lung function, and physical performance of participants. Methods: This study was prospective and conducted between 2020 and 2021 in the “X” hospital. If patients were Mechanically-Ventilated (MV) > 48 h, they were included. Results: Fifty COVID-19 and seventy-two non-COVID-19 participants were included in this study. The mean (SD) of the total SF-36 scores at COVID-19 patients at hospital discharge and 3 and 12 months were 46.5 (14.5), 68.6 (17.8), and 82.3 (8.9) (p < 0.05), while non-COVID-19 participants were 48.5 (12.1), 72.2 (9.9), and 82.7 (5.4) (p < 0.05). The forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) and 6-minute walking distance (6MWD) were assessed at 3 and 12 months and significantly improved over 12 months. Conclusion: The QoL of COVID-19 patients improved significantly over time as FEV1 and 6MWD. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine)
Show Figures

Figure 1

24 pages, 601 KiB  
Review
Pharmacological and Non-Pharmacological Treatments for Depression in Parkinson’s Disease: An Updated Review
by Efthalia Angelopoulou, Evangelia Stanitsa, Claire Chrysanthi Karpodini, Anastasia Bougea, Dionysia Kontaxopoulou, Stella Fragkiadaki, Christos Koros, Vasiliki Epameinondas Georgakopoulou, George Fotakopoulos, Yiannis Koutedakis, Christina Piperi and Sokratis G. Papageorgiou
Medicina 2023, 59(8), 1454; https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina59081454 - 12 Aug 2023
Cited by 13 | Viewed by 11372
Abstract
Depression represents one of the most common non-motor disorders in Parkinson’s disease (PD) and it has been related to worse life quality, higher levels of disability, and cognitive impairment, thereby majorly affecting not only the patients but also their caregivers. Available pharmacological therapeutic [...] Read more.
Depression represents one of the most common non-motor disorders in Parkinson’s disease (PD) and it has been related to worse life quality, higher levels of disability, and cognitive impairment, thereby majorly affecting not only the patients but also their caregivers. Available pharmacological therapeutic options for depression in PD mainly include selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors, serotonin and norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors, and tricyclic antidepressants; meanwhile, agents acting on dopaminergic pathways used for motor symptoms, such as levodopa, dopaminergic agonists, and monoamine oxidase B (MAO-B) inhibitors, may also provide beneficial antidepressant effects. Recently, there is a growing interest in non-pharmacological interventions, including cognitive behavioral therapy; physical exercise, including dance and mind–body exercises, such as yoga, tai chi, and qigong; acupuncture; therapeutic massage; music therapy; active therapy; repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS); and electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) for refractory cases. However, the optimal treatment approach for PD depression is uncertain, its management may be challenging, and definite guidelines are also lacking. It is still unclear which of these interventions is the most appropriate and for which PD stage under which circumstances. Herein, we aim to provide an updated comprehensive review of both pharmacological and non-pharmacological treatments for depression in PD, focusing on recent clinical trials, systematic reviews, and meta-analyses. Finally, we discuss the pharmacological agents that are currently under investigation at a clinical level, as well as future approaches based on the pathophysiological mechanisms underlying the onset of depression in PD. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Neurology)
Show Figures

Figure 1

13 pages, 3391 KiB  
Article
Critical-Illness: Combined Effects of Colistin and Vasoactive Drugs: A Pilot Study
by Rodopi Stamatiou, Anna Vasilaki, Dimitra Tzini, Vasiliki Tsolaki, Konstantina Zacharouli, Maria Ioannou, George Fotakopoulos, Markos Sgantzos and Demosthenes Makris
Antibiotics 2023, 12(6), 1057; https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics12061057 - 15 Jun 2023
Cited by 4 | Viewed by 2558
Abstract
Colistin is often used as a last resort for treating multidrug-resistant infections, particularly in critically ill patients in intensive care units. Nonetheless, its side effects, including myopathy, require careful monitoring. Vasoconstrictive drugs are also used in intensive care to increase blood pressure and [...] Read more.
Colistin is often used as a last resort for treating multidrug-resistant infections, particularly in critically ill patients in intensive care units. Nonetheless, its side effects, including myopathy, require careful monitoring. Vasoconstrictive drugs are also used in intensive care to increase blood pressure and improve blood flow to vital organs, which can be compromised in critically ill patients. The exact mechanism of colistin-induced muscle toxicity is of significant interest due to its potential intensive-care clinical implications. Colistin alone or in combination with vasoconstrictive agents was administrated in non-septic and LPS-induced septic animals for 10 days. Histopathological evaluation of the gastrocnemius muscle and dot-blot protein tissue analysis were performed. Increased intramuscular area, de-organization of the muscle fibers and signs of myopathy were observed in colistin-treated animals. This effect was ameliorated in the presence of vasoconstrictive drugs. Administration of colistin to septic animals resulted in a decrease of AMPK and cyclin-D1 levels, while it had no effect on caspase 3 levels. Vasoconstrictive drugs’ administration reversed the effects of colistin on AMPK and cyclin D1 levels. Colistin’s effects on muscle depend on septic state and vasoconstriction presence, highlighting the need to consider these factors when administering it in critically ill patients. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

11 pages, 505 KiB  
Article
Levosimendan in the Treatment of Patients with Severe Septic Cardiomyopathy
by Vasiliki Tsolaki, George E. Zakynthinos, John Papanikolaou, Vasileios Vazgiourakis, Kyriaki Parisi, George Fotakopoulos, Demosthenes Makris and Epaminondas Zakynthinos
Life 2023, 13(6), 1346; https://doi.org/10.3390/life13061346 - 8 Jun 2023
Cited by 7 | Viewed by 2455
Abstract
(1) Background: The optimal treatment of septic cardiomyopathy (SCM) remains questionable. The aim of the study was to compare the treatment of SCM based on levosimendan versus the best available therapy. (2) Methods: We conducted an observational study including patients with severe septic [...] Read more.
(1) Background: The optimal treatment of septic cardiomyopathy (SCM) remains questionable. The aim of the study was to compare the treatment of SCM based on levosimendan versus the best available therapy. (2) Methods: We conducted an observational study including patients with severe septic cardiomyopathy and circulatory failure. (3) Results: Fourteen patients (61%) received levosimendan, and nine received other treatments. The patients in the levosimendan group were more severely ill [APACHE II: 23.5 (14, 37) vs. 14 (13, 28), respectively, p = 0.012], and there was a trend for more decompensated LV function depicted by the LVEF [15% (10, 20) vs. 25% (5, 30), respectively, p = 0.061]. However, they presented a significantly higher increase in LVEF after seven days [15% (10, 20) to 50% (30, 68) (p < 0.0001) vs. 25% (5, 30) to 25% (15, 50) (p = 0.309), and a significantly higher decrease in lactate levels during the first 24 h [4.5 (2.5, 14.4) to 2.85 (1.2, 15), p = 0.036 vs. 2.9 (2, 18.9) to 2.8 (1, 15), p = 0.536]. Seven-day survival (64.3% vs. 33.3%, p = 0.424) and ICU survival (50% vs. 22.2%, p = 0.172) were higher in the first group, although differences did not reach statistical significance. The degree of left ventricular impairment and the magnitude of EF improvement by the seventh-day post-SCM onset were associated with mortality in regression analysis. (4) Conclusions: Our study presents main hemodynamic data supporting the possible efficacy of levosimendan treatment in patients with severe SCM. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Heart Failure and Coexisting Morbidities)
Show Figures

Figure 1

11 pages, 1336 KiB  
Article
Quality of Life and Family Support in Critically Ill Patients following ICU Discharge
by Konstantina Avgeri, Epaminondas Zakynthinos, Vasiliki Tsolaki, Markos Sgantzos, George Fotakopoulos and Demosthenes Makris
Healthcare 2023, 11(8), 1106; https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare11081106 - 12 Apr 2023
Cited by 7 | Viewed by 3456
Abstract
Background: Following discharge from the intensive care unit (ICU), critically ill patients may present cognitive dysfunction and physical disability. Objectives: To investigate the quality of life (QoL) of patients following discharge from ICU, physical performance and lung function and to assess the role [...] Read more.
Background: Following discharge from the intensive care unit (ICU), critically ill patients may present cognitive dysfunction and physical disability. Objectives: To investigate the quality of life (QoL) of patients following discharge from ICU, physical performance and lung function and to assess the role of support by family members and friends. Methods: This prospective study was conducted in the University Hospital of Larissa Greece between 2020 and 2021. Patients hospitalized at the ICU for at least 48 h were included and assessed at hospital discharge, at 3 and at 12 months later. The research implements of the study were a dedicated questionnaire and the SF-36 health questionnaire for the appraisal of the QoL. Lung function changes were assessed by spirometry and physical performance by the 6-min walking test (6MWT). Results: One hundred and forty-three participants were included in the study. The mean (SD) of the physical and mental health SF-36 scores at hospital discharge, 3 and 12 months were 27.32 (19.59), 40.97 (26.34) and 50.78 (28.26) (p < 0.0001) and 42.93 (17.00), 55.19 (23.04) and 62.24 (23.66), (p < 0.0001), respectively. The forced expiratory volume in one second and 6MWT significantly improved over 12 months. Patients who were supported by two or more family members or patients who were visited by their friends >3 times/week presented better scores in the physical and mental SF36 domains at 12 months. Conclusion: This study shows that the quality of life of Greek patients who were discharged from the ICU can be positively affected both by the support they receive from their family environment and friends. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Nursing Care in the ICU)
Show Figures

Figure 1

16 pages, 2076 KiB  
Review
EEG in Neurorehabilitation: A Bibliometric Analysis and Content Review
by Athanasia Tsiamalou, Efthimios Dardiotis, Konstantinos Paterakis, George Fotakopoulos, Ioannis Liampas, Markos Sgantzos, Vasileios Siokas and Alexandros G. Brotis
Neurol. Int. 2022, 14(4), 1046-1061; https://doi.org/10.3390/neurolint14040084 - 16 Dec 2022
Cited by 16 | Viewed by 3766
Abstract
Background: There is increasing interest in the role of EEG in neurorehabilitation. We primarily aimed to identify the knowledge base through highly influential studies. Our secondary aims were to imprint the relevant thematic hotspots, research trends, and social networks within the scientific community. [...] Read more.
Background: There is increasing interest in the role of EEG in neurorehabilitation. We primarily aimed to identify the knowledge base through highly influential studies. Our secondary aims were to imprint the relevant thematic hotspots, research trends, and social networks within the scientific community. Methods: We performed an electronic search in Scopus, looking for studies reporting on rehabilitation in patients with neurological disabilities. We used the most influential papers to outline the knowledge base and carried out a word co-occurrence analysis to identify the research hotspots. We also used depicted collaboration networks between universities, authors, and countries after analyzing the cocitations. The results were presented in summary tables, plots, and maps. Finally, a content review based on the top-20 most cited articles completed our study. Results: Our current bibliometric study was based on 874 records from 420 sources. There was vivid research interest in EEG use for neurorehabilitation, with an annual growth rate as high as 14.3%. The most influential paper was the study titled “Brain-computer interfaces, a review” by L.F. Nicolas-Alfonso and J. Gomez-Gill, with 997 citations, followed by “Brain-computer interfaces in neurological rehabilitation” by J. Daly and J.R. Wolpaw (708 citations). The US, Italy, and Germany were among the most productive countries. The research hotspots shifted with time from the use of functional magnetic imaging to EEG-based brain–machine interface, motor imagery, and deep learning. Conclusions: EEG constitutes the most significant input in brain–computer interfaces (BCIs) and can be successfully used in the neurorehabilitation of patients with stroke symptoms, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, and traumatic brain and spinal injuries. EEG-based BCI facilitates the training, communication, and control of wheelchair and exoskeletons. However, research is limited to specific scientific groups from developed countries. Evidence is expected to change with the broader availability of BCI and improvement in EEG-filtering algorithms. Full article
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

14 pages, 320 KiB  
Review
Neuromuscular Blockade in the Pre- and COVID-19 ARDS Patients
by Vasiliki Tsolaki, George E. Zakynthinos, Maria-Eirini Papadonta, Fotini Bardaka, George Fotakopoulos, Ioannis Pantazopoulos, Demosthenes Makris and Epaminondas Zakynthinos
J. Pers. Med. 2022, 12(9), 1538; https://doi.org/10.3390/jpm12091538 - 19 Sep 2022
Cited by 16 | Viewed by 3390
Abstract
Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) accounts for a quarter of mechanically ventilated patients, while during the pandemic, it overwhelmed the capacity of intensive care units (ICUs). Lung protective ventilation (low tidal volume, positive-end expiratory pressure titrated to lung mechanics and oxygenation, permissive hypercapnia) [...] Read more.
Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) accounts for a quarter of mechanically ventilated patients, while during the pandemic, it overwhelmed the capacity of intensive care units (ICUs). Lung protective ventilation (low tidal volume, positive-end expiratory pressure titrated to lung mechanics and oxygenation, permissive hypercapnia) is a non-pharmacological approach that is the gold standard of management. Among the pharmacological treatments, the use of neuromuscular blocking agents (NMBAs), although extensively studied, has not yet been well clarified. The rationale is to minimize the risk for lung damage progression, in the already-injured pulmonary parenchyma. By abolishing rigorous spontaneous efforts, NMBAs may decrease the generation of high transpulmonary pressures that could aggravate patients’ self-inflicted lung injury. Moreover, NMBAs can harmonize the patient–ventilator interaction. Recent randomized controlled trials reported contradictory results and changed the clinical practice in a bidirectional way. NMBAs have not been documented to improve long-term survival; thus, the current guidance suggests their use only in patients in whom a lung protective ventilation protocol cannot be applied, due to asynchrony or increased respiratory efforts. In the present review, we discuss the published data and additionally the clinical practice in the “war” conditions of the COVID-19 pandemic, concerning NMBA use in the management of patients with ARDS. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Personalized Medicine in the ICU)
Back to TopTop