Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

Article Types

Countries / Regions

Search Results (1)

Search Parameters:
Authors = Arash Azizi ORCID = 0000-0002-1463-2194

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
14 pages, 1152 KiB  
Article
Resin-Bonded Prosthesis in Posterior Area to Prevent Early Marginal Bone Resorption in Implants Placed at Tissue Level
by Carlo Prati, Fausto Zamparini, Arash Azizi, Andrea Spinelli and Maria Giovanna Gandolfi
Prosthesis 2022, 4(4), 575-588; https://doi.org/10.3390/prosthesis4040047 - 14 Oct 2022
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 2291
Abstract
Aim: To evaluate the effect of the resin-bonded prosthesis (Maryland bridge) on marginal bone remodeling of implants placed at the tissue level in the posterior region. Methods: Consecutive healthy patients (n = 46) were included in this clinical study. Flapless not-submerged implants were [...] Read more.
Aim: To evaluate the effect of the resin-bonded prosthesis (Maryland bridge) on marginal bone remodeling of implants placed at the tissue level in the posterior region. Methods: Consecutive healthy patients (n = 46) were included in this clinical study. Flapless not-submerged implants were placed with cover screws exposed and positioned approximately 0.5 mm above tissue level. Patients received the implant and a temporary resin-bonded prosthesis (RBP) (n = 22) or only the implant (n = 24). The RBPs were kept in place for 3 months and removed before impressions. The implants received a custom-made abutment and provisional resin crowns followed by definitive cemented metal–ceramic crowns after 2–3 weeks. The marginal bone level (MBL) was evaluated in a single-blind condition on scanned periapical radiographs and assessed mesially and distally (MBL-M/MBL-D). The bone levels of adjacent teeth (CEJ-M/CEJ-D) and the modification of the area between the implant and the mesial/distal teeth (Area-M/Area-D) were measured. All measurements were made at 1, 3 (pre-loading time) and 12 months (post-loading time). Linear regression models were fitted to evaluate the existence of any significant difference. Results: A total of 44 patients (20 Female, 24 Male; Mean age: 53.9 ± 10.3) completed the study. Two patients were excluded for fractured RBP or de-bonding. The drop-out was of 4.3%. After 12 months, all implants were free from complications. No peri-implantitis or mucositis were observed. The RBP group showed the most stable MBL at 12 months (−0.07 ± 0.41), statistically different from the non-RBP group (−0.67 ± 0.52). CEJ-M and CEJ-D were stable in both groups. Conclusion: The proposed approach of the use of RBP creates a more stable marginal bone level around implants placed at the tissue level, resulting in a reliable technique to protect bone tissue from mechanical and occlusal trauma during the healing period and osteointegration. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop