Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

Article Types

Countries / Regions

Search Results (3)

Search Parameters:
Authors = Andrey G. Botikov

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
16 pages, 15224 KiB  
Article
Immunogenicity and Protectivity of Sputnik V Vaccine in hACE2-Transgenic Mice against Homologous and Heterologous SARS-CoV-2 Lineages Including Far-Distanced Omicron BA.5
by Inna V. Dolzhikova, Amir I. Tukhvatulin, Daria M. Grousova, Ilya D. Zorkov, Marina E. Komyakova, Anna A. Ilyukhina, Anna V. Kovyrshina, Artem Y. Shelkov, Andrey G. Botikov, Ekaterina G. Samokhvalova, Dmitrii A. Reshetnikov, Andrey E. Siniavin, Daria M. Savina, Dmitrii V. Shcheblyakov, Fatima M. Izhaeva, Alina S. Dzharullaeva, Alina S. Erokhova, Olga Popova, Tatiana A. Ozharovskaya, Denis I. Zrelkin, Polina P. Goldovskaya, Alexander S. Semikhin, Olga V. Zubkova, Andrey A. Nedorubov, Vladimir A. Gushchin, Boris S. Naroditsky, Denis Y. Logunov and Alexander L. Gintsburgadd Show full author list remove Hide full author list
Vaccines 2024, 12(10), 1152; https://doi.org/10.3390/vaccines12101152 - 8 Oct 2024
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 1456
Abstract
Background: The SARS-CoV-2 virus continuously acquires mutations, leading to the emergence of new variants. Notably, the effectiveness of global vaccination efforts has significantly declined with the rise and spread of the B.1.1.529 (Omicron) variant. Methods: The study used virological, immunological and histological research [...] Read more.
Background: The SARS-CoV-2 virus continuously acquires mutations, leading to the emergence of new variants. Notably, the effectiveness of global vaccination efforts has significantly declined with the rise and spread of the B.1.1.529 (Omicron) variant. Methods: The study used virological, immunological and histological research methods, as well as methods of working with laboratory animals. In this study, we evaluated the Gam-COVID-Vac (Sputnik V), an adenoviral vaccine developed by the N.F. Gamaleya National Research Center for Epidemiology and Microbiology, and conducted experiments on hemizygous K18-ACE2-transgenic F1 mice. The variants studied included B.1.1.1, B.1.1.7, B.1.351, B.1.1.28/P.1, B.1.617.2, and B.1.1.529 BA.5. Results: Our findings demonstrate that the Sputnik V vaccine elicits a robust humoral and cellular immune response, effectively protecting vaccinated animals from challenges posed by various SARS-CoV-2 variants. However, we observed a notable reduction in vaccine efficacy against the B.1.1.529 (Omicron BA.5) variant. Conclusions: Our results indicate that ongoing monitoring of emerging mutations is crucial to assess vaccine efficacy against new SARS-CoV-2 variants to identify those with pandemic potential. If protective efficacy declines, it will be imperative to develop new vaccines tailored to current variants of the virus. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section COVID-19 Vaccines and Vaccination)
Show Figures

Figure 1

12 pages, 1081 KiB  
Article
Neutralizing Activity of Sera from Sputnik V-Vaccinated People against Variants of Concern (VOC: B.1.1.7, B.1.351, P.1, B.1.617.2, B.1.617.3) and Moscow Endemic SARS-CoV-2 Variants
by Vladimir A. Gushchin, Inna V. Dolzhikova, Alexey M. Shchetinin, Alina S. Odintsova, Andrei E. Siniavin, Maria A. Nikiforova, Andrei A. Pochtovyi, Elena V. Shidlovskaya, Nadezhda A. Kuznetsova, Olga A. Burgasova, Liudmila V. Kolobukhina, Anna A. Iliukhina, Anna V. Kovyrshina, Andrey G. Botikov, Aleksandra V. Kuzina, Daria M. Grousova, Amir I. Tukhvatulin, Dmitry V. Shcheblyakov, Olga V. Zubkova, Oksana V. Karpova, Olga L. Voronina, Natalia N. Ryzhova, Ekaterina I. Aksenova, Marina S. Kunda, Dmitry A. Lioznov, Daria M. Danilenko, Andrey B. Komissarov, Artem P. Tkachuck, Denis Y. Logunov and Alexander L. Gintsburgadd Show full author list remove Hide full author list
Vaccines 2021, 9(7), 779; https://doi.org/10.3390/vaccines9070779 - 12 Jul 2021
Cited by 100 | Viewed by 110845
Abstract
Since the beginning of the 2021 year, all the main six vaccines against COVID-19 have been used in mass vaccination companies around the world. Virus neutralization and epidemiological efficacy drop obtained for several vaccines against the B.1.1.7, B.1.351 P.1, and B.1.617 genotypes are [...] Read more.
Since the beginning of the 2021 year, all the main six vaccines against COVID-19 have been used in mass vaccination companies around the world. Virus neutralization and epidemiological efficacy drop obtained for several vaccines against the B.1.1.7, B.1.351 P.1, and B.1.617 genotypes are of concern. There is a growing number of reports on mutations in receptor-binding domain (RBD) increasing the transmissibility of the virus and escaping the neutralizing effect of antibodies. The Sputnik V vaccine is currently approved for use in more than 66 countries but its activity against variants of concern (VOC) is not extensively studied yet. Virus-neutralizing activity (VNA) of sera obtained from people vaccinated with Sputnik V in relation to internationally relevant genetic lineages B.1.1.7, B.1.351, P.1, B.1.617.2, B.1.617.3 and Moscow endemic variants B.1.1.141 (T385I) and B.1.1.317 (S477N, A522S) with mutations in the RBD domain has been assessed. The data obtained indicate no significant differences in VNA against B.1.1.7, B.1.617.3 and local genetic lineages B.1.1.141 (T385I), B.1.1.317 (S477N, A522S) with RBD mutations. For the B.1.351, P.1, and B.1.617.2 statistically significant 3.1-, 2.8-, and 2.5-fold, respectively, VNA reduction was observed. Notably, this decrease is lower than that reported in publications for other vaccines. However, a direct comparative study is necessary for a conclusion. Thus, sera from “Sputnik V”-vaccinated retain neutralizing activity against VOC B.1.1.7, B.1.351, P.1, B.1.617.2, B.1.617.3 as well as local genetic lineages B.1.1.141 and B.1.1.317 circulating in Moscow. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Vaccine Candidate against SARS-CoV-2)
Show Figures

Figure 1

22 pages, 11731 KiB  
Article
Genetic and Phylogenetic Characterization of Tataguine and Witwatersrand Viruses and Other Orthobunyaviruses of the Anopheles A, Capim, Guamá, Koongol, Mapputta, Tete, and Turlock Serogroups
by Alexey M. Shchetinin, Dmitry K. Lvov, Petr G. Deriabin, Andrey G. Botikov, Asya K. Gitelman, Jens H. Kuhn and Sergey V. Alkhovsky
Viruses 2015, 7(11), 5987-6008; https://doi.org/10.3390/v7112918 - 23 Nov 2015
Cited by 32 | Viewed by 9566
Abstract
The family Bunyaviridae has more than 530 members that are distributed among five genera or remain to be classified. The genus Orthobunyavirus is the most diverse bunyaviral genus with more than 220 viruses that have been assigned to more than 18 serogroups based [...] Read more.
The family Bunyaviridae has more than 530 members that are distributed among five genera or remain to be classified. The genus Orthobunyavirus is the most diverse bunyaviral genus with more than 220 viruses that have been assigned to more than 18 serogroups based on serological cross-reactions and limited molecular-biological characterization. Sequence information for all three orthobunyaviral genome segments is only available for viruses belonging to the Bunyamwera, Bwamba/Pongola, California encephalitis, Gamboa, Group C, Mapputta, Nyando, and Simbu serogroups. Here we present coding-complete sequences for all three genome segments of 15 orthobunyaviruses belonging to the Anopheles A, Capim, Guamá, Kongool, Tete, and Turlock serogroups, and of two unclassified bunyaviruses previously not known to be orthobunyaviruses (Tataguine and Witwatersrand viruses). Using those sequence data, we established the most comprehensive phylogeny of the Orthobunyavirus genus to date, now covering 15 serogroups. Our results emphasize the high genetic diversity of orthobunyaviruses and reveal that the presence of the small nonstructural protein (NSs)-encoding open reading frame is not as common in orthobunyavirus genomes as previously thought. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Recent Progress in Bunyavirus Research)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop