23 March 2026
Materials | New Study Reveals Most Accurate AI Model for Predicting Concrete Strength
You are accessing a machine-readable page. In order to be human-readable, please install an RSS reader.
All articles published by MDPI are made immediately available worldwide under an open access license. No special permission is required to reuse all or part of the article published by MDPI, including figures and tables. For articles published under an open access Creative Common CC BY license, any part of the article may be reused without permission provided that the original article is clearly cited. For more information, please refer to https://www.mdpi.com/openaccess.
Feature papers represent the most advanced research with significant potential for high impact in the field. A Feature Paper should be a substantial original Article that involves several techniques or approaches, provides an outlook for future research directions and describes possible research applications.
Feature papers are submitted upon individual invitation or recommendation by the scientific editors and must receive positive feedback from the reviewers.
Editor’s Choice articles are based on recommendations by the scientific editors of MDPI journals from around the world. Editors select a small number of articles recently published in the journal that they believe will be particularly interesting to readers, or important in the respective research area. The aim is to provide a snapshot of some of the most exciting work published in the various research areas of the journal.
Original Submission Date Received: .
A study published in the international journal Materials (ISSN: 1996-1944) shows that an Artificial Neural Network (ANN) model outperforms other common machine learning models—including Support Vector Machines (SVMs), Multiple Linear Regression (MLR), and Regression Trees (RT)—in predicting the compressive strength of concrete.
Traditionally, determining concrete compressive strength requires a time-consuming 28-day process involving the casting and testing of samples. This study compared the predictive performance of four models using a dataset of 1,030 samples containing eight key ingredients. The results demonstrate that the Artificial Neural Network, capable of learning complex non-linear relationships, performed best, achieving the lowest error across key metrics such as Root Mean Square Error (RMSE) and Mean Absolute Percentage Error (MAPE).
Summary of key performance results:
| Model | Root Mean Square Error (RMSE) |
| Artificial Neural Network (ANN) | 6.09 MPa |
| Support Vector Machine (SVM) | 6.31 MPa |
| Regression Tree (RT) | 6.60 MPa |
| Multiple Linear Regression (MLR) | 10.45 MPa |
Watch the video abstract
For more information about this innovative comparison and its implications for the construction industry, readers can access the article page to watch the video abstract prepared by the authors.
This video was produced with the support of MDPI’s Academic Video Service, which helps researchers bring their work to a wider audience through professional visual summaries and animations.
Read the full article:
“Performance Comparison of Machine Learning Models for Concrete Compressive Strength Prediction”
by Amit Kumar Sah and Yao-Ming Hong
Materials 2024, 17(9), 2075; https://doi.org/10.3390/ma17092075