Disrupting Barriers: Youth Disability and Access to Opportunities

A special issue of Youth (ISSN 2673-995X).

Deadline for manuscript submissions: closed (31 January 2026) | Viewed by 1907

Special Issue Editor


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Justice and Society, University of South Australia, Adelaide 5000, Australia
Interests: communication disability; patient and clinician communication self-efficacy; augmentative and alternative communication; social identity and disability; mental health and disability and inclusive research methodologies

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

Imagine yourself a teenager in an enrolment meeting with the school principal of your local high school. The principal turns to your parent(s) and says “because Alex doesn’t communicate, we’re not sure we can teach them. There are schools [special schools] better equipped to meet Alex’s needs.”

The passage to adulthood is stippled with experiences capable of building or diminishing the emerging young adult. For young disabled people, the individualization of disability makes it difficult to form a common identity, often resulting in the absence of strong oppositional role models (Jóhannsdóttir et al., 2022) to repel discrimination and claim a pride identity. The buffering effect that a shared identity with a marginalized group might offer, e.g., Black or LGBTQIA Pride, is not well developed, with disability commonly perceived as a deficit. Interpersonal, institutional and internalized ableism, where disability is cast as a diminished state of being human (Campbell, (2012) reigns unchecked on the path to adulthood. The establishment of ‘special schools’ and segregated classrooms and the entrenched, unchallenged notion that disabled children and young people should be consistently engaged in the pursuit of ‘becoming normal’ (Hodge and Runswick-Cole 2013) are common examples of institutionalized ableism. Intersectionality also plays a role as reflected in a recent review of youth with disabilities from racial minorities revealing the increased barriers encountered in obtaining (and during) employment (Lindsay & Dain, 2025). In the attempt to survive this culture, young people risk internalized ableism that carries shame (Jóhannsdóttir et al., 2022) and reinforces the distancing of disabled people from each other, spurring the “emulation by disabled people of ableist norms” (Campbell 2008, p. 155). These experiences of ableism negatively impact the identity and mental health of young people (Dee-Price et al., 2024)

This Special Issue “Disrupting Barriers: Youth Disability and Access to Opportunities” invites disruption to forces such as ableism and enculturated deficit beliefs about disability; to dispel well-intended euphemisms such as ‘differently abled’ or ‘special needs’ and to ensure words like ‘inclusion’ are not wielded in a way that fails to acknowledge the inherent right to belong. It seeks ideas and solutions for progressive change. For young people, access to opportunity means the liberty to aspire and to be encouraged to build hopes and dreams nurtured by practical adaptations made in schooling and tertiary education. It means safe and welcoming employment opportunities and financial security. Access to opportunity includes the right to decision making, to receive disability-safe and informed health and mental health care and accessible housing and to access built environments and services without needing to ask “will I fit in?” This Special Issue warmly welcomes the contributions of authors to describe ways that might disrupt barriers, build access and opportunities and ultimately improve the lives of many young people.

Acknowledgements: The Guest Editor acknowledges the input of young disabled people and their advocates in helping to describe what access to opportunities means. It also acknowledges Children and Young People with Disability Australia (CYDA) for their advocacy and excellent resources on this topic.

Dr. Betty Jean M. Dee-Price
Guest Editor

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 250 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for assessment.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a double-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Youth is an international peer-reviewed open access quarterly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 1200 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • access
  • disability identity
  • ableism
  • human rights
  • belonging

Benefits of Publishing in a Special Issue

  • Ease of navigation: Grouping papers by topic helps scholars navigate broad scope journals more efficiently.
  • Greater discoverability: Special Issues support the reach and impact of scientific research. Articles in Special Issues are more discoverable and cited more frequently.
  • Expansion of research network: Special Issues facilitate connections among authors, fostering scientific collaborations.
  • External promotion: Articles in Special Issues are often promoted through the journal's social media, increasing their visibility.
  • Reprint: MDPI Books provides the opportunity to republish successful Special Issues in book format, both online and in print.

Further information on MDPI's Special Issue policies can be found here.

Published Papers (1 paper)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

24 pages, 305 KB  
Article
From Tokenism to Transformation: Relational Guiding Principles for Genuine Co-Design with Young People with Disability Through a Critical Disability Lens
by Tess Altman, Shae Hunter and Madeleine Gay
Youth 2026, 6(2), 57; https://doi.org/10.3390/youth6020057 - 2 May 2026
Viewed by 690
Abstract
Co-design is a term commonly used to describe involving people with lived experience in program, policy, and research design and its outcomes. However, the implementation of co-design is inconsistent due to a lack of an agreed-upon definition, framework, and set of principles for [...] Read more.
Co-design is a term commonly used to describe involving people with lived experience in program, policy, and research design and its outcomes. However, the implementation of co-design is inconsistent due to a lack of an agreed-upon definition, framework, and set of principles for application. In this paper, the co-authors, as practising policy advocates and co-designers, aim to develop a set of guiding principles for genuine co-design with children and young people with disability in Australia. The paper first synthesises the existing Australian evidence from youth and disability scholarship, best practice approaches, and case studies of co-design projects recently undertaken where the co-authors are based at Children and Young People with Disability Australia, and then validates this evidence base through collaborative autoethnographic reflections of the co-authors’ collective experience in a co-design team. Drawing together themes and insights from this process, we propose four relationally driven guiding principles for genuine co-design that can be applied in Australian as well as international settings: 1. personalised: building trust and safety over time; 2. holistic: embedding co-design across the project lifespan; 3. reflexive: considering and sharing power; and 4. inclusive: prioritising accessibility and diversity. We end with final critical reflections on addressing power relations and ableist structures in genuine co-design with children and young people with disability. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Disrupting Barriers: Youth Disability and Access to Opportunities)
Back to TopTop