Next Article in Journal
Characterization of KH-560-Modified Jute Fabric/Epoxy Laminated Composites: Surface Structure, and Thermal and Mechanical Properties
Previous Article in Journal
Poly(arylene ether nitrile) Composites with Surface-Hydroxylated Calcium Copper Titanate Particles for High-Temperature-Resistant Dielectric Applications
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Polymers
Volume 11
Issue 5
10.3390/polym11050767
polymers-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Polyacrylamide Microspheres-Derived Fe3C@N-doped Carbon Nanospheres as Efficient Catalyst for Oxygen Reduction Reaction

by
Ming Chen
1,
Yu Jiang
1,
Ping Mei
1,
Yan Zhang
1,
Xianfeng Zheng
1,
Wei Xiao
1,
Qinliang You
2,
Xuemin Yan
1,* and
Haolin Tang
3,*
1
College of Chemistry and Environmental Engineering, Yangtze University, Jingzhou 434023, Hubei, China
2
Key Laboratory of Optoelectronic Chemical Materials and Devices, Ministry of Education, School of Chemical and Environmental Engineering, Jianghan University, Wuhan 430056, China
3
State Key Laboratory of Advanced Technology for Materials Synthesis and Processing, Wuhan University of Technology, Wuhan 430070, Hubei, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Polymers 2019, 11(5), 767; https://doi.org/10.3390/polym11050767
Submission received: 7 March 2019 / Revised: 16 April 2019 / Accepted: 19 April 2019 / Published: 1 May 2019
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
High-performance non-precious metal catalysts exhibit high electrocatalytic activity for the oxygen-reduction reaction (ORR), which is indispensable for facilitating the development of multifarious renewable energy systems. In this work; N-doped carbon-encapsulated Fe3C nanosphere ORR catalysts were prepared through simple carbonization of iron precursors loaded with polyacrylamide microspheres. The effect of iron precursors loading on the electrocatalytic activity for ORR was investigated in detail. The electrochemical measurements revealed that the N-doped carbon-encapsulated Fe3C nanospheres exhibited outstanding electrocatalytic activity for ORR in alkaline solutions. The optimized catalyst possessed more positive onset potential (0.94 V vs. reversible hydrogen electrode (RHE)), higher diffusion limiting current (5.78 mA cm−2), better selectivity (the transferred electron number n > 3.98 at 0.19 V vs. RHE) and higher durability towards ORR than a commercial Pt/C catalyst. The efficient electrocatalytic performance towards ORR can be attributed to the synergistic effect between N-doped carbon and Fe3C as catalytic active sites; and the excellent stability results from the core-shell structure of the catalysts.

1. Introduction

With the limited supply of fossil fuels and growing concern about environmental problems, the development of renewable energy and efficient energy conversion systems has become more important than ever. Fuel cells are regarded as one of the most promising energy conversion devices accessible nowadays [1,2,3,4,5,6]. Among various fuel cells, proton exchange membrane fuel cells (PEMFCs) and polymer electrolyte fuel cells (PEFCs) are considered as advanced electrochemical energy conversion systems due to their advantages of fast electrode reaction kinetics, high conversion efficiency and environmental friendliness [7,8]. In fuel cells, small molecule fuels are oxidized at the anode and concurrently oxygen is reduced at the cathode [9]. Efficient catalysts are necessary due to the sluggish kinetics of the oxygen-reduction reaction (ORR) at the cathode which is of great limit of the energy conversion efficiency of fuel cells. Pt and Pt-based materials have been used extensively as effective catalysts for ORR, which have extremely low overpotential as well as high current density in the ORR process [9,10,11,12]. However, the high price as well as the relatively low stability has been the main bottlenecks that hinder their broader commercialization [13,14]. Therefore, the development of low-cost and high-performance alternatives, especially non-precious metal catalysts, have aroused extensive research interest. Among these potential alternatives, N-doped carbon and transition metal species have attracted much attention due to the relatively low cost and promising electrocatalytic activity to ORR [15,16,17,18,19]. Furthermore, specific surface area and structure of the catalysts were found to determine the accessibility of the active sites and can largely improve the ultimate catalytic performance [20,21,22,23,24]. Recently, non-precious metal catalysts based on metal carbides, such as Fe3C, coated with N-doped carbon nanostructures, have been proved to be very efficient for ORR. The N-doped carbon-encapsulated structures offer a specific synergistic effect of Fe3C active sites and N-doped carbon matrix [25,26,27,28]. In addition, this kind of structure partly prevents metal composite from corrosion in electrolytes, which is necessary for long-term performance [29]. Typically, the N-doped carbon encapsulated Fe3C composite was prepared by Fe-MOF or a molecular precursor containing Fe, nitrogen and carbon precursor [30,31,32]. G. Ren [33] and R. Zhong [34] reported that porous core-shell Fe3C embedded N-doped carbon nanofibers were synthesized by the electrospinning method. The resulting nanofibers catalysts showed excellent ORR activities and high stabilities, which were attributed to well-dispersed nanocrystalline Fe3C active sites, high N-doping level, large surface areas, and a one-dimensional carbon nanostructure. Therefore, the development of a facile strategy for designing and synthesizing core-shell structured catalysts with high surface areas and abundant active sites is highly desirable for the further development of the N-doped carbon encapsulated metal composite ORR catalysts.
Herein, we report a facile and controllable fabrication of N-doped microporous carbon encapsulated Fe3C nanospheres derived from iron precursor-loaded polyacrylamide microspheres. Polyacrylamide microspheres act as the carbon and nitrogen precursor and possess excellent hydroscopicity, which can adsorb iron salts and ensure their uniform distribution. The amounts of the active sites are regulated by adsorbing different amount of iron precursors before carbonization of polyacrylamide microspheres and the porous structures are obtained by activation of KOH. The obtained catalysts are highly microporous with well-dispersed Fe3C nanospheres in the N-doped graphite carbon matrix. As expected, Fe3C@N-doped microporous carbon nanospheres exhibited better ORR electrocatalytic activity in alkaline media compared to the commercial Pt/C catalyst.

2. Experimental Section

2.1. Materials and Reagents

Tween-60 (C32H62O10), N,N′-Methylenebisacrylamide (C7H10N2O2, 98.0%), ammonium persulfate ((NH4)2S2O8, 98.5%), acrylamide (C3H5NO, 98.0%), Potassium hydroxide (KOH, >96.0%) and isopropanol (C3H8O, >99.7%) were obtained from Sinopharm Chemical Reagent Co., Ltd. (Shanghai, China). Ferroporphyrin (C34H32ClFeN4O4, 98.0%), Span-80 (C24H44O6) and mineral oil were purchased from Shanghai Yuanye Biological Co., Ltd, Shanghai, China). 20 wt % Pt/C catalyst and 5 wt % Nafion solution were obtained from Shanghai Macklin Biochemical Co., Ltd, Shanghai, China). All the chemicals were used as received without further purification.

2.2. Synthesis of Fe3C@N-Doped Carbon Nanospheres

Polyacrylamide microspheres were firstly synthesized by inverse emulsion polymerization. Briefly, 50 mL mineral oil and 6.2 g of Span-80 were mixed for 10 min to act as oil phase. 20.0 g of acrylamide monomer, 1.8 g of Tween-60 and 1 mL N,N′-Methylenebisacrylamide solution (0.04 wt %) were dissolved into 25 mL deionized water and then 1 mL ammonium persulfate solution (0.4 wt %) was dripped after stirring for 5 minutes, the mixture solution was served as water phase. The water phase was added dropwise into the oil phase with stirring at the speed of 600 r/min. After 30 min of vigorous stirring, the mixed solution was put into a 55 °C water bath and the N2 was aerated continuously to remove the air for about 40 min. Then the mixture was kept in a 55 °C water bath with stirring at the speed of 300 r/min in nitrogen atmosphere for 3 h to obtain crosslink-polyacrylamide reverse-phase microemulsion. The resulting w/o microemulsion was poured into excess acetone for demulsification. After washing with deionized water and absolute ethyl alcohol, the collected solids were dried at 70 °C overnight to obtain polyacrylamide microspheres. In order to obtain carbonization yield of polyacrylamide microspheres, in preliminary experiment, 2 g of dried polyacrylamide microspheres was pyrolyzed under flowing N2 for 1 h at 900 °C with a heating rate of 5 °C min−1 and 0.4 g of carbon was collected. This indicates that the carbonization yield of polyacrylamide microspheres was about 20%.
Fe3C@N-doped carbon nanospheres were prepared by direct carbonization of iron precursors-loaded polyacrylamide microspheres. In a typical preparation process, a certain amount of ferroporphyrin and 1.6 g of KOH solid were dissolved in 15 mL deionized water, the mixture solution was completely absorbed by 4 g dried polyacrylamide microspheres. The KOH was added to dissolve the Ferroporphyrin and then activate the carbon. The sample was dried at 70 °C for 24 h and calcinated at 900 °C for 1 h filled with N2 atmosphere and the ramping rate was 5 °C min−1. The resulting dark powder was washed with deionized water for several times to remove alkali metal K which was produced during the activation and calcination process, followed by drying at 70 °C overnight. The final as-synthesized product has been obtained and labeled as Fe3C@N/C-x, and x represents the mass ratio of ferroporphyrin and carbon according to the theoretical dosage. For comparison, a series of Fe3C@N/C-x composites were also prepared via the same procedure except for the difference of ferroporphyrin additive amounts. These as-synthesized catalysts with various ferroporphyrin additive amounts were labeled as Fe3C@N/C-0, Fe3C@N/C-0.5, Fe3C@N/C-1, Fe3C@N/C-2, respectively.

2.3. Characterizations

Transmission electron microscope (TEM) images were collected using a JEM-2100F TEM (Tokyo, Japan), XRD measurements were measured with a D8 Advance X-ray diffractometer from Bruker AXS Company (Karlsruhe, Germany). X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) analysis was recorded on a VG Multilab 2000 X-ray photoelectron spectrometer (VG Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). The pore structure analysis was performed through nitrogen adsorption and desorption isotherm measurements (BET, ASAP 2020, Micromeritics). The dynamic function theory (DFT) method was applied to calculate the distribution of the micropore size.

2.4. Electrochemical Measurements

To evaluate ORR activity, the electrochemical performance of Fe3C@N-doped microporous carbon nanospheres catalysts were performed in a standard three-electrode glass cell with N2 or O2-saturated 0.1M KOH solution at room temperature on the electrochemical workstation (CHI660E, CHI instrument) using a glassy carbon electrode (GCE, of 5.00 mm in diameter) as working electrode, a platinum wire as counter electrode, and Hg/HgO electrode as reference electrode, respectively. The electrochemical properties of as-synthesized catalysts were referred to the Hg/HgO electrode. The Hg/HgO reference electrodes were calibrated with respect to the reversible hydrogen electrode (RHE) before measurement [2]. The calibration values were E(RHE) = E(Hg/HgO) + 0.89 V in 0.1M KOH. 5.0 mg of as-synthesized catalysts power, 0.1 mL of deionized water, 0.9 mL of isopropanol and 0.02 mL of 5 wt % nafion solution was ultrasonically mixed to form the ink of the catalysts. The GCE was modified with 20 µL of the ink to serve as the working electrode. Cyclic voltammetry (CV) and linear sweep voltammetry (LSV) were carried out to evaluate the ORR performances. CV curves were obtained in N2 or O2-saturated 0.1M KOH electrolyte solutions without any rotation. The CV measurement data were carried out in the potential range from −0.6 V to 0.4 V at a sweep rate of 50 mV s−1, and LSV measurements were carried out at a scan rate of 5 mV s−1 in the potential range from -0.8 V to 0.2 V under various electrode rotation rates (400, 800, 1200, 1600, 2000 rpm) in O2-saturated 0.1M KOH electrolyte solutions. All samples were also tested in N2-saturated for comparison. Chronoamperometric measurements for each as-synthesized catalyst were investigated in O2-saturated 0.1M KOH (−0.3 V vs. Hg/HgO) at room temperature. The ORR process kinetics was analyzed using the Koutecky–Levich (K–L) equation.

3. Results and Discussion

The morphology of polyacrylamide microspheres and the N-doped carbon encapsulated Fe3C nanospheres catalysts were characterized by TEM. Figure 1a shows the surface morphology of polyacrylamide microspheres. The results showed that the polyacrylamide microspheres are aggregates of spherical particles with an average diameter of about 30 nm. After adsorbing iron precursors and carbonization, the spherical morphology of samples can be maintained. The TEM images of Fe3C@N/C-1 were shown in Figure 1b,c. It can be observed that the core-shell structured catalysts were successfully synthesized. The high-resolution TEM (HRTEM) results in Figure 1d showed that the spacing between adjacent lattice fringe in nanospheres core was 0.21 nm, corresponding to the (211) crystal planes of Fe3C. The lattice fringe in outer shell was 0.348 nm, corresponding to the graphite (002) plane. It indicated that the Fe3C nanospheres were obtained and wrapped within graphite carbon layer during the carbonization process.
In order to further identify the crystal structure of samples, X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns of these samples were recorded and shown in Figure 2. The major peaks located at 37.8°, 43.1°, 43.1°, 43.9°, 44.9°, 46.0°, 48.7° and 49.3° correspond to the Fe3C phase [35]. In addition, the peaks at 26.4° and 44.0° were assigned to the (002) and (004) reflection of graphitic carbon [26]. There are only broad graphitic carbon diffraction peaks in Fe3C@N/C-0 sample. With the introduction of ferroporphyrin, the graphitic carbon and Fe3C crystalline phases coexisted in the other samples. The relative intensity of Fe3C diffraction peaks increased with the iron content further enhanced in the synthesis process, indicating an increased ratio of Fe3C. The Fe3C nanocrystalline should originate from the reduction of iron precursor by carbon during the pyrolysis process. In the synthesis process of catalysts, ferroporphyrin was firstly dissolved in the KOH solution and homogeneously adsorbed in the polyacrylamide microspheres. Iron compound could be reduced by carbon to form metallic iron at high temperature, and these metallic iron atoms contribute to the catalytic graphitization of carbon [36]. When the iron atoms concentration is high enough, it would aggregate to form crystalline irons which react with the carbon atom to form a graphite layer-encapsulated Fe3C crystal during the process of pyrolysis and cooling. With the growth of Fe3C crystal, it is difficult for the large-size Fe3C crystal to make the inside carbon atoms diffuse onto the surface. Therefore, the relative intensity of graphitic carbon diffraction peaks weakens with the increase of iron content in the catalysts [35,36,37,38,39].
XPS was conducted to illustrate the surface elements of catalysts. XPS spectra of Fe3C@N/C catalysts are exhibited in Figure 3a, which revealed the existence of C, O, Fe and N in catalysts. There is only a weak Fe peak was detected in catalysts, which could be resulted from the coverage of graphitic layers on the Fe3C surface [33,39]. The high-resolution C 1s spectrum of Fe3C@N/C-1 shown in Figure 3b can be deconvoluted into four individual peaks that are assigned to C–C (284.6 eV), C–O (285.2 eV), C=O (286.5 eV), C–N (288.2 eV), respectively. The N 1s spectrum of Fe3C@N/C-1 shown in Figure 3c can be divided into three peaks, assigned to pyridinic N (398.4 eV), pyrrolic N (400.1 eV), graphitic N (401.2 eV), suggesting that nitrogen has been doped into the carbon authentically. It is generally believed that pyridinic N and graphitic N can serve as the efficient active sites for ORR. Pyridinic N increases the spin density and the density of π states of the carbon atoms near the Fermi level which could enhance the reduction of O2, while graphitic N can increase the conductivity of the catalysts [35,40,41]. In the case of the high-resolution Fe 2p spectrum (Figure 3d), the peaks at 711.0 eV and 724.4 eV are consistent with Fe 2p3/2 and Fe 2p1/2 states, respectively [42,43,44]. Fe, C and N content, N/C weight ratios and the relative atomic amount of N species in all of Fe3C@N/C-x samples are shown in Table 1. The amount of Fe incorporated into the final catalyst increases with the enhancement of ferroporphyrin loading during the synthesis process, while the amount of N declines slightly at the same time. In all cases, graphitic N and pyridinic N are dominant species. In general, with the increase of the amount of Fe3C catalytic active sites, the amount of N-doped carbon catalytic active sites declines.
The nitrogen adsorption and desorption isotherms were conducted to investigate the pore structure of these catalyst samples and the results are shown in Figure 4a. The nitrogen adsorption and desorption isotherm curves of all catalysts reveal a Type-I sorption isotherm with no hysteresis, manifesting the microporous structure of the Fe3C@N/C-x samples. In the synthesis process, KOH was used not only as an alkaline medium to dissolve ferroporphyrin, but also as an activator to form micropores. The abundant micropores and high specific surface area can improve the accessibility of electrolyte and oxygen to the active sites. The specific surface area and pore volume of all samples are shown in Table 2. With the increase of iron content, the total surface area of Fe3C@N/C-x catalysts reduce from 2484 to 1687 m2 g−1. Figure 4b illustrates the pore size distribution (PSD) curves of Fe3C@N/C-x catalysts. The results of PSDs are greatly distributed in the microporous region which is less than 2.0 nm and the peaks are mostly 0.78 nm and 0.59 nm.
CV and LSV measurements were performed to study the electrochemical activity of these catalysts. Figure 5 shows the CV curves of Fe3C@N/C-1 catalyst and 20 wt % Pt/C in N2 and O2-saturated 0.1 M KOH solution. Well-defined oxygen reduction peak for Fe3C@N/C-1 catalyst and 20 wt % Pt/C could be seen in the CV curves when saturating the alkaline solution with O2, illustrating the pronounced ORR activity of Fe3C@N/C-1 catalyst. LSV curves were carried out on a rotating disk electrode (RDE) for the further evaluation of the electrocatalytic activity of catalyst samples for ORR. The LSV measurement was tested in O2-saturated 0.1M KOH solution at a rotation rate of 1600 rpm with a potential scan rate of 5 mV s−1 (the solid line). All samples were also tested in N2-saturated for comparison (the same colour scheme as the dotted line). As shown in Figure 6, the Fe3C@N/C-1 catalyst with onset potential of 0.94 V (vs. RHE) and diffusion-limiting current of 5.78 mA cm−2 reveals the remarkable catalytic performance towards ORR compared to the benchmark Pt/C (0.91 V and 5.55 mA cm−2 correspondingly). By contrast, the Fe3C@N/C-0 catalyst shows the lowest catalytic activity to ORR. It is reported that the encapsulated metal compound’s nanoparticles could produce host–guest electronic interaction and change the local work function of the carbon shell, creating additional active sites to ORR [33]. Doping of nitrogen into the carbon shell could further improve the catalytic activity of these core-shell structured catalysts by modifying the electronic properties of carbon surface. In addition, there is a general agreement that N-doped graphitic carbon is playing an important role in enhancing the conductivity of the catalysts which is essential for ORR. Therefore, the enhanced electrocatalytic performance of Fe3C@N/C-1 can be attributed to the synergistic effect between N-doped carbon and Fe3C as catalytic active sites. It should be noted that Fe3C@N/C-2 showed obviously lower electrocatalytic activity than that of Fe3C@N/C-1, due to the reduced specific surface area and depressed graphitization degree of the carbon shell in the Fe3C@N/C-2 catalyst. In Table 3 below, the performance of the Fe3C@N/C-1 catalyst is compared to some other Fe3C-based electrocatalysts reported in literature. Overall, the Fe3C@N/C-1 catalyst possessed comparative onset potential with other Fe3C based electrocatalysts. Moreover, the diffusion limiting current of the Fe3C@N/C-1 catalyst was higher than that of most catalysts, indicating the excellent electrochemical activity towards ORR.
RDE measurement of Fe3C@N/C-1 catalyst was evaluated under different rotation speeds from 400 rpm to 2000 rpm and the results are shown in Figure 7a. The Koutecky–Levich plots (Figure 7b) were calculated by the recorded reaction currents at −0.3 V on the LSV curves of the Fe3C@N/C-1 catalyst under various rotating speeds to study the reaction kinetics of this catalyst. The electron-transfer numbers of the Fe3C@N/C-1 catalyst were calculated by the K–L equation [47]. The n value for Fe3C@N/C-1 catalyst count from the slope of K–L plots is 3.85–4.00, which is close to 4, suggesting the Fe3C@N/C-1 catalyze ORR process through a quasi-four-electron process. H2O2 was released during 2e− process which degrades the membrane electrolyte; therefore, the 4e− process is desired for a fuel cell [48,49,50,51]. The calculated Tafel slope is shown in Figure 8a, exhibiting a similar Tafel slope for the Fe3C@N/C-1catalyst (68.62 mV per decade) and Pt/C (67.8 mV per decade), indicating the similar reaction kinetics of ORR on the Fe3C@N/C-1 catalyst surface and the first electron is probably the rate-determining step.
The stability of catalyst is necessary for the practical application of fuel cells. The chronoamperometric measurements were investigated to evaluate the durability of the Fe3C@N/C-1 catalyst. The glassy-carbon electrode modified with Fe3C@N/C-1 and commercial Pt/C were tested at constant voltage of −0.3 V in an O2-saturated 0.1M KOH aqueous solution with rotation rate of 1600 rpm for 20,000 s. The current-time response is shown in Figure 8b. As we can see, the current-time chronoamperometric response for commercial Pt/C exhibited a rapid current decrease and the current loss is about 25% after 20,000 s. In comparison, the current retention for the Fe3C@N/C-1 catalyst is 94% after 20,000 s, implying the excellent stability under working conditions. The excellent stability of Fe3C@N/C-1 catalyst may in virtue of the appearance of the sufficient outer graphene layer. Thus, it can be concluded that the Fe3C@N-doped microporous carbon nanosphere catalyst is a promising alternative for costly Pt-based electrocatalysts to apply in fuel cells.

4. Conclusions

In summary, Fe3C@N-doped microporous carbon nanosphere catalysts were facilely and successfully synthesized by using polyacrylamide microspheres as a carbon and nitrogen resource and ferroporphyrin as an iron resource. The composite and nanostructure of catalysts were characterized by TEM, XRD, XPS and BET analysis and the electrochemical activity of these catalysts were investigated by CV and LSV measurements. The Fe3C@N/C-1 catalyst showed excellent ORR activity and long-term stability in alkaline medium, with an onset potential and diffusion limiting current of 0.94 V vs. RHE and 5.78 mA cm−2, which is superior to that of commercial Pt/C catalyst. The outstanding performance is attributed to the synergistic effect between N-doped carbon and Fe3C as catalytic active sites, and the abundant microporous structure can improve the accessibility of electrolyte and oxygen to active sites. In addition, the carbon shell prevents Fe3C active sites from leaching out. These results show that this kind of core-shell catalyst could be a promising alternative to Pt-based catalysts for the further development of durable and efficient ORR catalysts.

Author Contributions

X.Y. and H.T. conceived and designed the experiments; M.C. and Y.J performed the experiments; P.M., X.Z. and W.X. analyzed the data; Q.Y. contributed analysis tools; X.Y. and Y.Z. wrote the paper.

Funding

This research was funded by National Natural Science Foundation of China, grant number 51472034 and 21701115, and Opening Project of Key Laboratory of Optoelectronic Chemical Materials and Devices, Ministry of Education, Jianghan University, grant number JDGD-201806.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Steele, B.C.H.; Heinzel, A. Materials for fuel-cell technologies. Nat. Cell Boil. 2001, 414, 345–352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Sa, Y.J.; Seo, D.-J.; Woo, J.; Lim, J.T.; Cheon, J.Y.; Yang, S.Y.; Lee, J.M.; Kang, D.; Shin, T.J.; Shin, H.S.; et al. A General Approach to Preferential Formation of Active Fe-Nx Sites in Fe-N/C Electrocatalysts for Efficient Oxygen Reduction Reaction. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2016, 138, 15046–15056. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Gasteiger, H.A.; Kocha, S.S.; Sompalli, B.; Wagner, F.T. Activity benchmarks and requirements for Pt, Pt-alloy, and non-Pt oxygen reduction catalysts for PEMFCs. Appl. Catal. B: Environ. 2005, 56, 9–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Debe, M.K. Electrocatalyst approaches and challenges for automotive fuel cells. Nat. Cell Boil. 2012, 486, 43–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Shao, M.; Chang, Q.; Dodelet, J.-P.; Chenitz, R. Recent Advances in Electrocatalysts for Oxygen Reduction Reaction. Chem. Rev. 2016, 116, 3594–3657. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Mistry, H.; Varela, A.S.; Kühl, S.; Strasser, P.; Cuenya, B.R. Nanostructured electrocatalysts with tunable activity and selectivity. Nat. Rev. Mater. 2016, 1, 16009. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Vinothkannan, M.; Kim, A.R.; Kumar, G.G.; Yoo, D.J. Sulfonated graphene oxide/Nafion composite membranes for high temperature and low humidity proton exchange membrane fuel cells. RSC Adv. 2018, 8, 7494–7508. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Vinothkannan, M.; Kim, A.R.; Kumar, G.G.; Yoon, J.-M.; Yoo, D.J. Toward improved mechanical strength, oxidative stability and proton conductivity of an aligned quadratic hybrid (SPEEK/FPAPB/Fe 3 O 4 -FGO) membrane for application in high temperature and low humidity fuel cells. RSC Adv. 2017, 7, 39034–39048. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Niu, W.; Li, L.; Liu, X.; Wang, N.; Liu, J.; Zhou, W.; Tang, Z.; Chen, S. Mesoporous N-Doped Carbons Prepared with Thermally Removable Nanoparticle Templates: An Efficient Electrocatalyst for Oxygen Reduction Reaction. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2015, 137, 5555–5562. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Ramakrishnan, S.; Karuppannan, M.; Vinothkannan, M.; Ramachandran, K.; Kwon, O.J.; Yoo, D.J. Ultrafine Pt Nanoparticles Stabilized by MoS2/N-Doped Reduced Graphene Oxide as a Durable Electrocatalyst for Alcohol Oxidation and Oxygen Reduction Reactions. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2019, 11, 12504–12515. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Arukula, R.; Vinothkannan, M.; Kim, A.R.; Yoo, D.J. Cumulative effect of bimetallic alloy, conductive polymer and graphene toward electrooxidation of methanol: An efficient anode catalyst for direct methanol fuel cells. J. Alloy. Compd. 2019, 771, 477–488. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Kang, Y.J.; Ye, X.C.; Chen, J.; Cai, Y.; Diaz, R.E.; Adzic, R.R.; Stach, E.A.; Murrzy, C.B. Design of Pt-Pd Binary Superlattices Exploiting Shape Effects and Synergistic Effects for Oxygen Reduction Reactions. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2013, 135, 42–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Proch, S.; Wirth, M.; White, H.S.; Anderson, S.L. Strong Effects of Cluster Size and Air Exposure on Oxygen Reduction and Carbon Oxidation Electrocatalysis by Size-Selected Pt-n (n≤ 11) on glassy carbon electrodes. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2013, 135, 3073–3086. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Yang, H.; Geng, L.; Zhang, Y.; Chang, G.; Zhang, Z.; Liu, X.; Lei, M.; He, Y. Graphene-templated synthesis of palladium nanoplates as novel electrocatalyst for direct methanol fuel cell. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2019, 466, 385–392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Liang, H.-W.; Wei, W.; Wu, Z.-S.; Feng, X.; Müllen, K. Mesoporous Metal–Nitrogen-Doped Carbon Electrocatalysts for Highly Efficient Oxygen Reduction Reaction. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2013, 135, 16002–16005. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Yin, H.; Zhang, C.; Liu, F.; Hou, Y. Hybrid of Iron Nitride and Nitrogen-Doped Graphene Aerogel as Synergistic Catalyst for Oxygen Reduction Reaction. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2014, 24, 2930–2937. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Serov, A.; Artyushkova, K.; Atanassov, P. Fe-N-C Oxygen Reduction Fuel Cell Catalyst Derived from Carbendazim: Synthesis, Structure, and Reactivity. Adv. N.a. Mater. 2014, 4, 1301735. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Lin, L.; Zhu, Q.; Xu, A.-W. Noble-Metal-Free Fe–N/C Catalyst for Highly Efficient Oxygen Reduction Reaction under Both Alkaline and Acidic Conditions. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2014, 136, 11027–11033. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Chung, H.T.; Won, J.H.; Zelenay, P. Active and stable carbon nanotube/nanoparticle composite electrocatalyst for oxygen reduction. Nat. Commun. 2013, 4, 1922. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Wang, H.; Liu, R.; Li, Y.; Lü, X.; Wang, Q.; Zhao, S.; Yuan, K.; Cui, Z.; Li, X.; Xin, S.; et al. Durable and Efficient Hollow Porous Oxide Spinel Microspheres for Oxygen Reduction. Joule 2018, 2, 337–348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Wu, Z.; Lv, Y.; Xia, Y.; Webley, P.A.; Zhao, D. Ordered Mesoporous Platinum@Graphitic Carbon Embedded Nanophase as a Highly Active, Stable, and Methanol-Tolerant Oxygen Reduction Electrocatalyst. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2012, 134, 2236–2245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Silva, R.; Voiry, D.; Chhowalla, M.; Asefa, T. Efficient Metal-Free Electrocatalysts for Oxygen Reduction: Polyaniline-Derived N- and O-Doped Mesoporous Carbons. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2013, 135, 7823–7826. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Liang, Y.; Wang, H.; Diao, P.; Chang, W.; Hong, G.; Li, Y.; Gong, M.; Xie, L.; Zhou, J.; Wang, J.; et al. Oxygen Reduction Electrocatalyst Based on Strongly Coupled Cobalt Oxide Nanocrystals and Carbon Nanotubes. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2012, 134, 15849–15857. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Zhou, K.; Zhou, W.; Liu, X.; Wang, Y.; Wan, J.; Chen, S. Nitrogen Self-Doped Porous Carbon from Surplus Sludge as Metal-Free Electrocatalysts for Oxygen Reduction Reactions. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2014, 6, 14911–14918. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Ferrero, G.A.; Preuss, K.; Marinovic, A.; Jorge, A.B.; Mansor, N.; Brett, D.J.L.; Fuertes, A.B.; Solis, M.S.; Titirici, M.-M. Fe–N-Doped Carbon Capsules with Outstanding Electrochemical Performance and Stability for the Oxygen Reduction Reaction in Both Acid and Alkaline Conditions. ACS Nano 2016, 10, 5922–5932. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  26. Jiang, W.J.; Gu, L.; Li, L.; Zhang, Y.; Zhang, X.; Zhang, L.J.; Wang, J.Q.; Hu, J.S.; Wei, Z.D.; Wan, L.J. Understanding the High Activity of Fe-NC Electrocatalysts in Oxygen Reduction: Fe/Fe3C Nanoparticles Boost the Activity of Fe-Nx. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2016, 138, 3570–3578. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Wei, J.; Liang, Y.; Hu, Y.X.; Kong, B.A.; Simon, G.P.; Zhang, J.; Jiang, S.P.; Wang, H.T. A Versatile Iron-Tannin-Framework Ink Coating Strategy to Fabricate Biomass-Derived Iron Carbide/Fe-N-Carbon Catalysts for Efficient Oxygen Reduction. Angew Chem. Int. Ed. 2016, 55, 1355–1359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Wu, Z.-Y.; Xu, X.-X.; Hu, B.-C.; Liang, H.-W.; Lin, Y.; Chen, L.-F.; Yu, S.-H. Iron Carbide Nanoparticles Encapsulated in Mesoporous Fe-N-Doped Carbon Nanofibers for Efficient Electrocatalysis. Angew. Chem. 2015, 127, 8297–8301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Yang, W.X.; Liu, X.J.; Yue, X.Y.; Jia, J.B.; Guo, S.J. Bamboo-like Carbon Nanotube/Fe3C Nanoparticle Hybrids and Their Highly Efficient Catalysis for Oxygen Reduction. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2015, 137, 1436–1439. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Galeano, C.; Meier, J.C.; Peinecke, V.; Bongard, H.; Katsounaros, I.; Topalov, A.A.; Lu, A.; Mayrhofer, K.J.J.; Schuth, F. Toward Highly Stable Electrocatalysts via Nanoparticle Pore Confinement. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2012, 134, 20457–20465. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Hu, Y.; Jensen, J.O.; Zhang, W.; Cleemann, L.N.; Xing, W.; Bjerrum, N.J.; Li, Q. Hollow Spheres of Iron Carbide Nanoparticles Encased in Graphitic Layers as Oxygen Reduction Catalysts. Angew. Chem. 2014, 126, 3749–3753. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Xiao, M.; Zhu, J.; Feng, L.; Liu, C.; Xing, W. Meso/Macroporous Nitrogen-Doped Carbon Architectures with Iron Carbide Encapsulated in Graphitic Layers as an Efficient and Robust Catalyst for the Oxygen Reduction Reaction in Both Acidic and Alkaline Solutions. Adv. Mater. 2015, 27, 2521–2527. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Ren, G.; Lu, X.; Li, Y.; Zhu, Y.; Dai, L.; Jiang, L. Porous Core–Shell Fe 3 C Embedded N-doped Carbon Nanofibers as an Effective Electrocatalysts for Oxygen Reduction Reaction. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2016, 8, 4118–4125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Zhong, R.Q.; Wu, Y.X.; Liang, Z.B.; Guo, W.H.; Zhi, C.X.; Qu, C.; Gao, S.; Zhu, B.J.; Zhang, H.; Zou, R.Q. Fabricating hierarchically porous and Fe3C-embeded nitrogen-rich carbon nanofibersas exceptional electocatalysts for oxygen reduction. Carbon 2018, 142, 115–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Aijaz, A.; Masa, J.; Rösler, C.; Antoni, H.; Fischer, R.A.; Schuhmann, W.; Muhler, M. MOF-Templated Assembly Approach for Fe3 C Nanoparticles Encapsulated in Bamboo-Like N-Doped CNTs: Highly Efficient Oxygen Reduction under Acidic and Basic Conditions. Chem. A Eur. J. 2017, 23, 12125–12130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  36. He, Z.B.; Maurice, J.L.; Gohier, A.; Lee, C.S.; Pribat, D.; Cojocaru, C.S. Iron catalysts for the growth of carbon nanofibers: Fe, Fe3C or both? Chem. Mater. 2010, 23, 5379–5387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Yoshida, H.; Takeda, S.; Uchiyama, T.; Kohno, H.; Homma, Y. Atomic-Scale In-situ Observation of Carbon Nanotube Growth from Solid State Iron Carbide Nanoparticles. Nano Lett. 2008, 8, 2082–2086. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Rodríguez-Manzo, J.A.; Terrones, M.; Terrones, H.; Kroto, H.W.; Sun, L.; Banhart, F. In situ nucleation of carbon nanotubes by the injection of carbon atoms into metal particles. Nat. Nanotechnol. 2007, 2, 307–311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Tang, H.; Zeng, Y.; Zeng, Y.; Wang, R.; Cai, S.; Liao, C.; Cai, H.; Lu, X.; Tsiakaras, P. Iron-embedded nitrogen doped carbon frameworks as robust catalyst for oxygen reduction reaction in microbial fuel cells. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 2017, 202, 550–556. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Park, S.H.; Choi, C.H.; Woo, S.I. Heteroatom doped carbons prepared by the pyrolysis of bio-derived amino acids as highly active catalysts for oxygen electro-reduction reactions. Green Chem. 2011, 13, 406–412. [Google Scholar]
  41. Wang, Y.; Liu, Y.; Wang, K.; Song, S.; Tsiakaras, P.; Liu, H. Preparation and characterization of a novel KOH activated graphite felt cathode for the electro-Fenton process. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 2015, 165, 360–368. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Zhao, Y.; Watanabe, K.; Hashimoto, K. Self-Supporting Oxygen Reduction Electrocatalysts Made from a Nitrogen-Rich Network Polymer. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2012, 134, 19528–19531. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Liang, J.; Jiao, Y.; Jaroniec, M.; Qiao, S.Z. Sulfur and Nitrogen Dual-Doped Mesoporous Graphene Electrocatalyst for Oxygen Reduction with Synergistically Enhanced Performance. Angew. Chem. 2012, 124, 11664–11668. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Wohlgemuth, S.-A.; Fellinger, T.-P.; Jäker, P.; Antonietti, M. Tunable nitrogen-doped carbon aerogels as sustainable electrocatalysts in the oxygen reduction reaction. J. Mater. Chem. A 2013, 1, 4002. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Wang, R.; Li, J.; Cai, S.; Zeng, Y.; Zhang, H.; Cai, H.; Tang, H. Facile Synthesis of Fe3 C@Graphene Hybrid Nanorods as an Efficient and Robust Catalyst for Oxygen Reduction Reaction. ChemPlusChem 2016, 81, 646–651. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Wang, Q.; Lei, Y.; Chen, Z.; Wu, N.; Wang, Y.; Wang, B.; Wang, Y. Fe/Fe 3 C@C nanoparticles encapsulated in N-doped graphene–CNTs framework as an efficient bifunctional oxygen electrocatalyst for robust rechargeable Zn–air batteries. J. Mater. Chem. A 2018, 6, 516–526. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Chakrapani, K.; Sampath, S. The morphology dependent electrocatalytic activity of Ir nanostructures towards oxygen reduction. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2014, 16, 16815–16823. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Wu, G.; More, K.; Johnston, C.M.; Zelenay, P. High-Performance Electrocatalysts for Oxygen Reduction Derived from Polyaniline, Iron, and Cobalt. Science 2011, 332, 443–447. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Proietti, E.; Larouche, N.; Jaouen, F.; Lefevre, M.; Tian, J.; Herranz, J.; Dodelet, J.-P. Iron-based cathode catalyst with enhanced power density in polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cells. Nat. Commun. 2011, 2, 416. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. Wu, Z.-S.; Yang, S.; Sun, Y.; Parvez, K.; Feng, X.; Müllen, K. 3D Nitrogen-Doped Graphene Aerogel-Supported Fe 3 O 4 Nanoparticles as Efficient Electrocatalysts for the Oxygen Reduction Reaction. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2012, 134, 9082–9085. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  51. Liang, C.; Tao, N.; Wang, B.; Lin, S.; Lei, M. Graphite carbon coated TiN nanoparticles as high durable oxygen reduction reaction catalyst in alkaline electrolyte. Micro Nano Lett. 2018, 13, 1260–1264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Polymers 11 00767 g001 550
Figure 1. (a) Transmission electron microscope (TEM) image of polyacrylamide microspheres; (b,c) TEM and (d) high-resolution TEM (HRTEM) image of Fe3C@N/C-1.
Figure 1. (a) Transmission electron microscope (TEM) image of polyacrylamide microspheres; (b,c) TEM and (d) high-resolution TEM (HRTEM) image of Fe3C@N/C-1.
Polymers 11 00767 g001
Polymers 11 00767 g002 550
Figure 2. X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns of Fe3C@N/C-x samples.
Figure 2. X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns of Fe3C@N/C-x samples.
Polymers 11 00767 g002
Polymers 11 00767 g003 550
Figure 3. (a) X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) survey spectra of Fe3C@N/C-x samples. (b) C 1s, (c) N 1s and (d) Fe 2p spectra of Fe3C@N/C-1.
Figure 3. (a) X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) survey spectra of Fe3C@N/C-x samples. (b) C 1s, (c) N 1s and (d) Fe 2p spectra of Fe3C@N/C-1.
Polymers 11 00767 g003
Polymers 11 00767 g004 550
Figure 4. (a) Nitrogen adsorption and desorption curves. (b) pore size distribution of Fe3C@N/C-x samples.
Figure 4. (a) Nitrogen adsorption and desorption curves. (b) pore size distribution of Fe3C@N/C-x samples.
Polymers 11 00767 g004
Polymers 11 00767 g005 550
Figure 5. Cyclic voltammetry (CV) curves of Fe3C@N/C-1 catalyst and 20 wt % Pt/C in N2 and O2-saturated in 0.1 M KOH.
Figure 5. Cyclic voltammetry (CV) curves of Fe3C@N/C-1 catalyst and 20 wt % Pt/C in N2 and O2-saturated in 0.1 M KOH.
Polymers 11 00767 g005
Polymers 11 00767 g006 550
Figure 6. Linear sweep voltammetry (LSV) curves of Fe3C@N/C-x samples and Pt/C catalyst at the rotation speed of 1600 rpm in O2 (solid lines) and N2-saturated (dotted lines).
Figure 6. Linear sweep voltammetry (LSV) curves of Fe3C@N/C-x samples and Pt/C catalyst at the rotation speed of 1600 rpm in O2 (solid lines) and N2-saturated (dotted lines).
Polymers 11 00767 g006
Polymers 11 00767 g007 550
Figure 7. (a) LSV curves of Fe3C@N/C-1 catalyst with different rotating speed from 400 to 2000 rpm. (b) Koutecky–Levich (K–L) plots of Fe3C@N/C-1 catalyst calculated from Figure 7a.
Figure 7. (a) LSV curves of Fe3C@N/C-1 catalyst with different rotating speed from 400 to 2000 rpm. (b) Koutecky–Levich (K–L) plots of Fe3C@N/C-1 catalyst calculated from Figure 7a.
Polymers 11 00767 g007
Polymers 11 00767 g008 550
Figure 8. (a) Tafel plots of Fe3C@N/C-1 catalyst and Pt/C obtained from the rotating disk electrode (RDE) measurements. (b) current-time chronoamperometric response of Fe3C@N/C-1 catalyst and Pt/C in O2-saturated 0.1 M KOH at −0.3 V for 20000s.
Figure 8. (a) Tafel plots of Fe3C@N/C-1 catalyst and Pt/C obtained from the rotating disk electrode (RDE) measurements. (b) current-time chronoamperometric response of Fe3C@N/C-1 catalyst and Pt/C in O2-saturated 0.1 M KOH at −0.3 V for 20000s.
Polymers 11 00767 g008
Table
Table 1. Fe, C and N content, N/C weight ratios and the relative atomic amount of N species in all of the Figure 3 samples derived from XPS analyses.
Table 1. Fe, C and N content, N/C weight ratios and the relative atomic amount of N species in all of the Figure 3 samples derived from XPS analyses.
SampleWeight Content (%)N/C Weight RatioRelative Atomic Amount of N Species
CNFePyridinic NPyrrolic NGraphitic N
Fe3C@N/C-087.038.260.000.0940.320.270.41
Fe3C@N/C-0.587.967.180.780.0820.350.260.39
Fe3C@N/C-188.686.821.020.0800.360.250.39
Fe3C@N/C-289.726.131.250.0680.370.220.41
Table
Table 2. The specific surface area and pore volume of Fe3C@N/C-x samples.
Table 2. The specific surface area and pore volume of Fe3C@N/C-x samples.
SampleSBETVmicro
(m2 g−1)(cm3g−1)
Fe3C@N/C-02484.370.76
Fe3C@N/C-0.52121.870.71
Fe3C@N/C-11967.830.68
Fe3C@N/C-21687.450.58
Table
Table 3. Summary of Fe3C-based electrocatalysts performance for oxygen-reduction reaction (ORR).
Table 3. Summary of Fe3C-based electrocatalysts performance for oxygen-reduction reaction (ORR).
CatalystElectrolyteRotation Speed/rpmOnset Potential/V vs. RHEDiffusion Limiting Current (mA cm−2) vs. RHERef.
PMF-8000.1M KOH16000.955.78[29]
Fe3C/C-7000.1M KOH16000.894.21[31]
Fe3C@NCNF-9000.1M KOH16000.934.51[33]
Fe3C/NCNF0.1M KOH16001.0124.81[34]
Fe3C/b-NCNT0.1M KOH16000.966.25[35]
Fe/C HN-700C-60M0.1M KOH16000.985.95[45]
Fe@C-NG/NCNTs0.1M KOH16000.935.11[46]
Fe3C@N/C-10.1M KOH16000.945.78This work

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Chen, M.; Jiang, Y.; Mei, P.; Zhang, Y.; Zheng, X.; Xiao, W.; You, Q.; Yan, X.; Tang, H. Polyacrylamide Microspheres-Derived Fe3C@N-doped Carbon Nanospheres as Efficient Catalyst for Oxygen Reduction Reaction. Polymers 2019, 11, 767. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym11050767

AMA Style

Chen M, Jiang Y, Mei P, Zhang Y, Zheng X, Xiao W, You Q, Yan X, Tang H. Polyacrylamide Microspheres-Derived Fe3C@N-doped Carbon Nanospheres as Efficient Catalyst for Oxygen Reduction Reaction. Polymers. 2019; 11(5):767. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym11050767

Chicago/Turabian Style

Chen, Ming, Yu Jiang, Ping Mei, Yan Zhang, Xianfeng Zheng, Wei Xiao, Qinliang You, Xuemin Yan, and Haolin Tang. 2019. "Polyacrylamide Microspheres-Derived Fe3C@N-doped Carbon Nanospheres as Efficient Catalyst for Oxygen Reduction Reaction" Polymers 11, no. 5: 767. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym11050767

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop