Feeding and Gastrointestinal Symptomatology: Comparing Infants Without Oral Restriction to Those with Treated and Untreated Tethered Oral Tissues

Objectives: The aims of this study were to (1) evaluate if there were any significant differences in gastrointestinal (GI) and/or feeding symptoms for infants with tethered oral tissues (TOTs) pre-frenotomy compared to infants with untreated TOTs and infants without TOTs, and (2) evaluate if treatment via frenotomy led to improvements in symptoms that more closely align with GI and/or feeding symptoms in infants with untreated TOTs and/or infants without (TOTs). Methods: This study utilized a pretest-only control group design. The Infant Eating Assessment Tool (InfantEAT) and Gastrointestinal and Gastroesophageal Reflux (GIGER) Scale were used to evaluate infant feeding and GI symptoms, respectively. Multiple linear regression was used to compare scores between the three groups at baseline, controlling for age and gestational age at birth. Treatment group’s average score after intervention was compared to the mean baseline score of the other two groups. For the treatment group, paired t-test was used to evaluate changes in scores before and after the treatment. Results: All subscales of both the InfantEAT and GIGER demonstrated statistically significant differences for infants with TOTs before intervention when compared with infants with TOTs who did not undergo treatment and infants without TOTs. Conclusion: This study demonstrates the importance of considering structure along with function for infants with tongue- and/or lip-tie. Clinicians must evaluate maternal symptoms alongside infant factors. The decision to treat TOTs via frenotomy is multifactorial and is not necessary in every mother-infant dyad.