Abstract
In the search for the CP violation (CPV) in the leptonic sector, crucial information was obtained a decade ago from reactor and accelerator experiments. The discovery and measurement of the third neutrino mixing angle, , with a value ∼9, allow for the possibility to discover the leptonic Dirac CP-violating angle, , with long baseline neutrino Super Beams. ESSSB is a long-baseline neutrino project that will be able to measure the CPV in the leptonic sector at the second oscillation maximum, where the sensitivity of the experiment is higher compared to that at the first oscillation maximum. The extension project, ESSSB+, aims to address a very challenging task on measuring the neutrino–nucleon cross-section, which is the dominant term of the systematic uncertainty, in the energy range 0.2–0.6 GeV, using a Low-Energy nuSTORM (LEnuSTORM) and an ENUBET-like Low-Energy Monitored Neutrino Beam (LEMNB) facilities. The target station plays the main role in generating a well defined and focused pion, and hence muon, beam.
1. Introduction
The present generation of -oscillation experiments [1,2] promises to determine the values of the three mixing angles and the two mass-splitting parameters. However, neither of these experiments can reach the confidence level for CPV discovery. The relatively high value of significantly modified the optimal strategy for leptonic CPV discovery and precision measurement, provided that the far detector is placed at the second, rather than the first, oscillation maximum. The future long-baseline detectors such as the Deep Underground Neutrino Experiment (DUNE) [3] in the USA, the Tokai to Hyper-Kamiokande (T2HK) [4] in Japan and the European Spallation Source neutrino Super Beam (ESSSB) [5] in Sweden, Europe, plan to use an intense “super” neutrino beam working at mega Watt scale to reach this goal.
The recently published ESSSB CDR [6] has demonstrated that the initially foreseen physics performance of the detector has surpassed all earlier expectations. ESSSB will be measuring at the second oscillation maximum, where the sensitivity of CPV will be close to three times larger as compared to DUNE and T2HK experiments, which aim for measuring at the first oscillation maximum. However, the measurement of the neutrino–nucleus cross-sections (-A) is fundamental to reduce the systematic error in the determination of the from -oscillations, especially since data on -A cross-sections in the neutrino energy range of ESSSB, 0.2–0.6 GeV are currently very scarce [7]. An extension application of the ESSSB project, the ESSSB+, was submitted in March 2022 to the HORIZON-EU European Commission—and has recently been accepted (July 2022)—to be funded for the next four years. The ESSSB+ project aims to address this very challenging task on measuring the -A cross-sections using a Low-Energy nuSTORM [8] (LEnuSTORM) and an ENUBET-like [9] Low-Energy Monitored Neutrino Beam (LEMNB) facilities. However, several physics and technological challenges must be precisely studied and simulated before addressing the final design of this experiment. Among these challenges, the special target station plays the main role in producing a well-defined and focused pion beam, which will be then decayed to a muon beam in the straight section of the LEnuSTORM race track ring. Figure 1 shows the layout of the ESS site with the proposed ESSSB and ESSSB+ modifications.
Figure 1.
The ESS layout with the proposed modifications for the ESSSB and ESSSB+ experiments.
2. The ESSSB Concept
As discussed here [10], the ESS linac will provide an average proton beam power of 5 to the spallation neutron target divided into 14 macro-pulses per second, each with a duration of . Interleaved with these pulses will be another 5 of beam power delivered to the accumulator ring and later to the neutrino target of the ESSSB target station facility, also at 14 . Those additional proton pulses will be brought from the end of the linac by a ring-to-switchyard (R2S) beam transfer line to a beam switchyard (BSY), which will share and focus the proton beam pulse onto four targets. The focusing of the secondary particles (mostly pions) produced by the protons impinging on the solid target inside the decay tunnel of the facility is realized by a hadronic collector system, which is based on four magnetic horns. Figure 2 (top) shows a 3D drawing of the four-horn system. The magnetic field inside each horn is produced by a 350 current pulse, generated by a power supply unit (PSU), of 100 μs duration, circulating inside the horn body and repeated at 14 . These high current intensity and frequency, as well as the emission of secondary particles, produce a significant amount of power deposition in the horns. The target technology is based on a granular target concept that is able to afford proton beam power with proton kinetic energy. The target geometry consists of a packed bed target of 78 cm long and 3 cm diameter, filled with 3 diameter titanium spheres. The target canister is drilled with apertures on each side to provide an efficient transverse cooling with helium flow working at 10 bar to extract 138 of deposited power. Figure 2 (bottom) shows a 3D drawing of the packed-bed target design.
Figure 2.
(Top) A 3D drawing of the four-horn target system. (Bottom) A 3D model of the target concept based on a packed bed of titanium spheres.
3. The ESSSB+ Target Station Concept
For the new studies, a special transfer line from the ESSSB ring-to-target transfer line will be added to extract the proton beam from the accumulator ring to a special target station of the ESSSB+. This target station will contain one target-horn assembly, similar to that designed for the ESSSB. It will feed the LEnuSTORM and the LEMNB with pions and muons. A pion and muon extraction system will be added to the ESSSB+ target station. The horn shape will be re-optimized for this utilization. Figure 3 shows a conceptual drawing of the concept of the target station facility with the Pion Extraction and Initial Focusing System (PEIFS).
Figure 3.
A conceptual drawing of the ESSSB+ target station facility, with the concept of the Pion Extraction and Initial Focusing System.
The previous ESSSB simulations have shown that the secondary beam, produced from the interaction between the proton beam and the target and focused by the horn, has an average momentum of 700 . The beam profile follows a 2D Gaussian distribution with a beam width (FWHM) of more than ∼ 1 at the beam dump level, i.e., 50 from the horn exit. With such a beam momentum, the average decay length of the pions, , is found to be ∼40 . In order to select the proper length of the pion tunnel, where the pion extraction system will be placed in, dedicated preliminary simulations of the secondary beam radial distribution as a function of the distance, from 1 to 10 , from the horn exit was conducted in the preparation of the ESSSB+ application. These simulations have shown that the secondary beam will follow a 2D Gaussian profile with ∼ , at 10 from the horn exit (Figure 4 (left)). Because extracting and focusing such a large beam is not a trivial process, a dedicated particle extracting and deviating system with proper “sufficiently” large aperture will need to be investigated. We have found a similar setup that uses a large-opening dipole magnet in the BGOOD experiment [11] at the ELSA facility in Bonn University, Germany, shown in Figure 4 (right). Such a magnetic system that depends on using conventional dipoles to bend the beam in both horizontal and vertical planes will be considered as a starting design in these new studies. Moreover, sets of magnetic focusing elements, e.g., quadrupoles, will ensure keeping the transverse envelops of the extracted pion beam minimal while propagating through the beam line. Furthermore, serious safety problems can be encountered due to the concomitant increase in the radiation levels, requiring substantially more shielding and protection. Therefore, a dedicated comprehensive radio-safety simulation devoted to detailed calculations of the different parts of the target station facility activation will be applied in order to precisely determine the shielding characteristics, e.g., thickness, required to comply with the radiological regulations of the site.
Figure 4.
(Left) Secondary beam distribution, with 2D Gaussian fit (black circles), at 10 from the horn exit. (Right) BGOOD dipole magnet at the ELSA facility in Bonn University [11].
4. Conclusions
After the success of the H2020 ESSSB design study, proving the feasibility of the upgrade of the European Spallation Source to become, in addition to a neutron facility, also a very competitive neutrino facility, an extension project, the ESSSB+, has been proposed—and accepted—to reinforce and develop complementary studies of the original physics goal of the project to study the CPV in the leptonic sector. A dedicated target station equipped with a pion extraction and focusing system will be designed within the framework of this new design study.
Author Contributions
Conceptualization, T.T. and E.B.; methodology, T.T. and E.B.; investigation, T.T. and E.B.; writing—original draft preparation, T.T.; writing—review and editing, T.T. and E.B. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Funding
This research was funded by the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation program under grant agreement No. 777419, the agencies CNRS/IN2P3–France, and the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG, German Research Foundation)—Projektnummer 423761110.
Institutional Review Board Statement
Not applicable.
Informed Consent Statement
Not applicable.
Data Availability Statement
Not applicable.
Acknowledgments
This project has been supported by the COST Action EuroNuNet “Combining forces for a novel European facility for neutrino-antineutrino symmetry-violation discovery” and by the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation program under grant agreement No. 777419. We also acknowledge support of the funding agencies CNRS/IN2P3–France, the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG, German Research Foundation)—Projektnummer 423761110, the Bulgarian National Science Fund Contract DCOST01/8, the Ministry of Science and Education of Republic of Croatia, grant No. KK.01.1.1.01.0001, and the Spanish Agencia Estatal de Investigacion through the grants IFT Centro de Excelencia Severo Ochoa No. CEX2020-001007-S and PID2019-108892RB, funded by MCIN/AEI/10.13039/501100011033. The authors would like to thank Tom Jude from the BGOOD experiment in Bonn University for discussions and supporting documents on the large-opening dipole magnet.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Abbreviations
The following abbreviations are used in this manuscript:
| CDR | Conceptual design report |
| CPV | Charge-parity violation |
| ESSSB | European Spallation Source neutrino Super Beam |
| ESSSB+ | European Spallation Source neutrino Super Beam plus |
| LEnuSTORM | Low-Energy neutrinos from Stored Muons |
| LEMNB | Low-Energy Monitored Neutrino Beam |
| LINAC | Linear accelerator |
| PEIFS | Pion Extraction and Initial Focusing System |
| R2S | Ring-to-switchyard |
| BSY | Beam switchyard |
| PSU | Power supply unit |
| BGOOD | BGO open dipole |
References
- Abe, K.; Akutsu, R.; Ali, A.; Alt, C.; Andreopoulos, C.; Anthony, L.; Antonova, M.; Aoki, S.; Ariga, A.; Arihara, T.; et al. Constraint on the Matter-Antimatter Symmetry-Violating Phase in Neutrino Oscillations. Nature 2020, 580, 339–344. [Google Scholar]
- Acero, M.A.; Adamson, P.; Aliaga, L.; Alion, T.; Allakhverdian, V.; Altakarli, S.; Anfimov, N.; Antoshkin, A.; Aurisano, A.; Back, A.; et al. First Measurement of Neutrino Oscillation Parameters using Neutrinos and Antineutrinos by NOvA. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2019, 123, 151803. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Abi, B.; Acciarri, R.; Acero, M.A.; Adamov, G.; Adams, D.; Adinolfi, M.; Ahmad, Z.; Ahmed, J.; Alion, T.; Alonso Monsalve, S.; et al. Volume I. Introduction to DUNE. JINST 2020, 15, T08008. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ballett, P.; King, S.F.; Pascoli, S.; Prouse, N.W.; Wang, T. Sensitivities and synergies of DUNE and T2HK. Phys. Rev. D 2017, 96, 033003. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Alekou, A.; Baussan, E.; Kraljevic, N.B.; Blennow, M.; Bogomilov, M.; Bouquerel, E.; Burgman, A.; Carlile, C.J.; Cederkall, J.; Christiansen, P.; et al. Updated physics performance of the ESSnuSB experiment. Eur. Phys. J. C 2021, 81, 1130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Alekou, A.; Baussan, E.; Bhattacharyya, A.K.; Kraljevic, N.B.; Blennow, M.; Bogomilov, M.; Bolling, B.; Bouquerel, E.; Buchan, O.; Burgman, A.; et al. The European Spallation Source Neutrino Super Beam Conceptual Design Report. Available online: https://arxiv.org/abs/2203.08803 (accessed on 2 June 2022).
- Formaggio, J.A.; Zeller, G.P. From eV to EeV: Neutrino cross sections across energy scales. Rev. Mod. Phys. 2012, 84, 1307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Long, K. The nuSTORM experiment. J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 2018, 1056, 012033. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Terranova, F.; Acerbi, F.; Ballerini, G.; Bonesini, M.; Branca, A.; Brizzolari, C.; Brunetti, G.; Calviani, M.; Capelli, S.; Carturan, S.M.; et al. The ENUBET experiment. In Proceedings of the 40th International Conference on High Energy Physics (ICHEP), PoS(ICHEP2020) 182, Prague, Czech Republic, 28 July–6 August 2020. [Google Scholar]
- Tolba, T. The ESS Based Neutrino Super Beam Experiment (ESSνSB). In Proceedings of the 22nd Particles and Nuclei International Conference (PANIC2021), PoS(PANIC2021) 284, Lisbon, Portugal, 5–10 September 2021. [Google Scholar]
- Alef, S.; Bauer, P.; Bayadilov, D.; Beck, R.; Becker, M.; Bella, A.; Bieling, J.; Böse, S.; Braghieri, A.; Brinkmann, K.-T.; et al. The BGOOD experimental setup at ELSA. Eur. Phys. J. A 2020, 56, 104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2023 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).



