Next Article in Journal
Phenolic Compounds from Amaranthaceae Family as Potential Antitumor and Antibacterial Drugs
Previous Article in Journal
Rapid Method for Faults Detection in Beer Using a Low-Cost Electronic Nose and Machine Learning Modelling
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Proceeding Paper

New Rural Women’s Power: Sustainable Rural Food Preparation Model Inheritance and Business Model †

1
Department of Restaurant, Hotel and Institutional Management, Fu Jen Catholic University, New Taipei City 242062, Taiwan
2
Department of Applied Science of Living, Chinese Culture University, Taipei 11114, Taiwan
3
Department of Hospitality Management, National Taitung Junior College, Taitung 95045, Taiwan
4
Department of Hospitality Management, Hungkuo Delin University of Technology, New Taipei City 236302, Taiwan
5
Ph.D. Program in Nutrition and Food Science, Fu Jen Catholic University, New Taipei City 242062, Taiwan
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Presented at the 2nd International Electronic Conference on Foods—“Future Foods and Food Technologies Science for a Sustainable World”, 15–30 October 2021; Available online: https://foods2021.sciforum.net/.
Biol. Life Sci. Forum 2021, 6(1), 42; https://doi.org/10.3390/Foods2021-11031
Published: 14 October 2021

Abstract

:
Taiwan’s rural areas are currently facing important food problems and the dilemma of human inheritance. Based on the United Nations’ belief that rural women must be empowered; they are a key force in promoting agricultural and rural development, as well as food security and nutrition, by harming the environment and helping the poor. Food security and livelihoods and production activities that revitalize production and sustained economic growth have made important contributions to sustainable development. They are also important and active in the implementation of employment policies, social integration, regional and rural development, agriculture and environmental protection. Through the reflection and verification of basic theories and theories, this study conducts research on the value of structural rural food preparation and innovation. This research uses the in-depth focus group interview method and questionnaire survey method to focus on the women’s home economics groups in the Taiwan Farmers Association to analyze the business model of food preparation and inheritance. The results of the study show that there are five dimensions in the business model of agricultural food preparation and inheritance of women’s home economics groups. The contribution of this research is as follows: In response to the threat of the COVID-19 pandemic and changes in rural food in Taiwan, this research has constructed an indicator model of rural food preparation and innovation value. It can be used as an important reference for the inheritance and development of Taiwan’s agriculture and food.

1. Introduction

In recent years, governments, entrepreneurs, experts and scholars in various countries have paid great attention to “local food” [1,2]. Food is regarded as a project that can be commercialized, to convey the sustainability, authenticity and cultural, geographic or rural characteristics of local ingredients [3,4,5]. Ferguson and Iturbide [6] pointed out in their research that the food of various cultures affects cultural adaptation. Globalization, urbanization, modernization, and immigration have shaped and changed the way modern people consume food.
Foreign immigrants will move with their food culture, and they will also recreate a new food culture due to the process of multiple migrations. Taiwan is a multicultural society, and ethnic groups must learn from the perspective of multiculturalism to pay attention to cross-cultural behavior and the process of cultural construction and adjustment. People habitually connect with society through food in daily life. From a historical point of view, food will continue to reconstruct the relationship between society and culture through food exchange as civilization evolves [7]. Therefore, in order to develop local agricultural and food specialties and promote the charm of local industrial food culture, it is necessary to use local ingredients to make dishes, combine local cultural characteristics, and increase the culinary value of rural food [8]. Especially under the threat of the COVID-19 pandemic and the changing state of rural food in Taiwan.
With the advancement of the concept of gender equality, countries around the world are paying more and more attention to the importance of women in agriculture. Article 14 of the United Nations “Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women” “Rural Women’s Rights” states that rural women should share equal rights with men in terms of political rights, marriage and family, and employment, and recognize rural women have an important contribution to the family, economy and society.
In Taiwan’s early traditional agricultural production, men were the main labor force, and women were mainly family management. However, due to the migration of the population and the shortage of young labor forces, the proportion of rural women engaged in agricultural production began to increase in recent years. According to the 2020 Taiwan Agricultural Employment Survey, the agricultural employment population is about 548,800, and women are about 142,000. The proportion of rural women is 26.0%. They are mainly engaged in field work on their own farms. In global agriculture, the expansion of agricultural product production is related to women. The increase in employment is related to the increase in female employment [9], and the importance of rural women’s participation in agricultural production has become an important key trend [10,11,12,13].
The essence of rural food inheritance is based on connecting local food and cultural characteristics, prompting rural women to use traditional cooking techniques to integrate local ingredients, and then promote local traditional culture, so that local culture can be inherited. This inherited element can be produced and replicated as a result of the dynamic interaction between tradition and modernity [14]. However, the rapid development of modern society has caused the gradual separation and disintegration of the relationship between local culture and material life, and society. Particularly under the domination of commercialization and the tourism-oriented, the relationship between rural food itself and the local area is often invisible [15]. Therefore, as time goes by, traditional dishes may be lost or gradually forgotten. However, in the cultural assets of the countryside, we must make the status of food in the cultural assets continue to improve, so that the traditional food culture in the countryside can be exchanged in culture and play an important role in economic development.
The agricultural food market has been rapidly changing over the past few decades. This includes globalization, trade liberalization, population growth, urbanization, policy changes, changes in food consumption patterns and diets, technological changes, and environmental degradation. Global drivers have created diversified trends, such as: eating local ingredients, focusing on small-scale agriculture, food quality, and embedding social and ethical values in the food supply chain [16,17]. Diversified development can increase additional sources of income in rural areas to make up for the reduced income. Diversification means the development of additional non-agricultural activities on the farm, including the production and processing of high-quality food (for example: organic agriculture, local cuisine, etc.).
Agricultural food management has become a necessary condition to help rural communities that rely on agriculture to meet these new demands [18]. Innovative business models can not only increase productivity or sales, but also increase social capital, local food systems, and access opportunities in the international market, which in turn bring benefits beyond currency profitability [19]. Agricultural product innovation management needs to consider its participants and actors, because the interaction between multiple participants and actors can enhance the innovation capabilities of other participants [20,21]. Under the modern rural development model, regardless of the production of rural cuisine, high-quality food with local characteristics, or even commodities such as public spaces, rural areas must be transformed to match the process of commercialization of agricultural products [22].
The objectives of this research, based on the research background and rationale described above, were as follows:
  • To construct indicators based on the inheritance of rural women’s sustainable food preparation skills and rural food operations.
  • To analyze the weighting of rural women’s sustainable food material inheritance and rural food operations.

2. Materials and Methods

This research first adopted the content analysis method to analyze the concept of inheritance and management of sustainable cooking skills for rural women in previous literature. Then, five dimensions of Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) questionnaire indicators were designed and expert AHP measurement was conducted. The indicators in the questionnaire (level and interlevel indicators) are independent of each other, and the direction of influence is based on the assumptions from the upper level to the lower level, design of the framework and use of AHP to judge the weight of each indicator.
After reviewing the relevant literature on rural food and business management [11,14,22,23,24,25,26,27] and the opinions of expert meetings, the deduced research aspects of this study were derived: (1) innovation competition, (2) market operation, (3) education and training, (4) festival activity, and (5) promotion and development. These five aspects were used as the research framework for the AHP.
The objects of the study were 31 professionals in the field of rural food. Before filling out the questionnaire, various explanations on the inheritance and management indicators of rural women’s use of sustainable food cooking skills were first explained to the interviewees to avoid confusion. The interviewees’ understanding and relationship with each indicator was effectively established. The AHP method questionnaire uses 1 to 9 as the evaluation scale and uses pairwise comparison to answer the questions.
After reviewing the questionnaires that were missed and not answered as scheduled, the consistency statistical test was performed immediately. All the valid questionnaires met the standard of C.R. value less than 0.10 [28]. After that, the questionnaires were effectively collected, according to the AHP criteria [28], and the Expert Choice statistical software was used to calculate the weights of each indicator, and the individual and overall weights were analyzed according to their professional attributes to evaluate the indicators.

3. Results

The procedure of the AHP method is divided into eight steps [29].
  • Decision-making issues are identified, and evaluation indicators are listed.
  • The hierarchical structure is constructed.
  • Pairwise comparisons are performed for evaluation and judgement.
  • The matrix at each hierarchy is developed according to step 3 to construct all judgement matrices.
This study targeted sub-hierarchies of all hierarchies to perform pairwise comparisons to obtain all judgement matrices. Judgement matrices of all hierarchies are constructed according to the following Formula (1):
[ A k ] = [ a i j ] = [ 1 1 / a 12 a 12 1 a 1 n a 2 n 1 / a 1 n 1 / a 2 n 1 ] ,   k = 1 ,   2 ,   ,   n ,
where, Ak is the judgement matrix at each hierarchy;
i is the hierarchical code;
j is the index code;
k is the expert code; and
a is the matrix of each hierarchy.
5.
Pairwise comparison matrices are constructed, priority vectors are calculated, and consistency is examined.
The consistency is examined using the following Formula (2):
CI = ( λ m a x n ) / ( n 1 ) .
The consistency index of the randomly produced positive reciprocal matrix is the random index (RI). Using the above CI and RI, the consistency ratio of the pairwise comparison matrix is obtained, C.R. = CI/RI.
6.
All hierarchies are subject to steps 3–5 and connected according to each hierarchy.
7.
The total priority weight of the overall hierarchy is calculated.
8.
The consistency of the overall hierarchy is evaluated.
The consistent ratio of the overall hierarchy is mainly the consistency index of the hierarchy (CIH) divided by the random index of the hierarchy (RIH). Therefore, the consistency ratio of the overall hierarchy should be smaller than 0.10. If this standard is not met, evaluation should be amended again to improve the consistency ratio. In summary, the overall consistency ratio of hierarchy (CRH) was smaller than 0.10. 0.10.
This research integrates the concepts of various agricultural and food professionals and conducts AHP analysis on the indicators of this research, as shown in Table 1.

4. Discussion

In terms of overall expert opinions, the cultural inheritance and innovation of rural women’s use of local ingredients must integrate multiple different aspects, including: (1) innovation competition, (2) market operation, (3) education and training, (4) festival activity, and (5) promotion and development. Agricultural experts all have their own indicators of importance. For example, experts in industry focus on education, training and promotion and development, while government departments and academia both focus on education and training.
Therefore, this study provides a clearer development and implementation direction for women farmers when inheriting their sustainable food cooking skills and business models, so that Taiwan’s agricultural industry can clearly understand the importance of cultural inheritance and management in the future. Indicators, and the government’s agricultural department, can provide courses and policies that meet the needs of the agricultural food market and industry, and academia can also formulate suitable guidance strategies and directions for rural women in preparing food.
It can help the rural areas to develop to be more diversified and meet the needs of local food characteristics, so that local ingredients can be used more innovatively, so that the local traditional food culture can be inherited, and it can also be solved through the management of real estate and local sales. The predicament faced by the rural areas is to establish incentives to attract foreign tourists to enhance the overall development of the rural areas [11,30].

5. Conclusions

The results of this study show that education and training is the primary indicator, promotion and development is the second most important indicator, and festivals are the third most important indicator. Therefore, the inheritance of sustainable cooking skills in rural areas requires not only education and training, but also promotion. The way of development and the use of local ingredients in festival activities show that the inheritance must be integrated in education, promotion, and activities. The three aspects are complementary to each other to produce synergy.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, Y.-C.C.; Data curation, C.-S.L. and C.-W.C.; For malanalysis, Y.-C.C., P.-L.T. and M.-C.C.; Funding acquisition, C.-S.L., Y.-C.C. and P.-L.T.; Investigation, P.-L.T.; Methodology, C.-S.L. and Y.-C.C.; Project administration, C.-S.L., C.-W.C. and M.-C.C.; Resources, P.-L.T. and C.-W.C.; Software, C.-S.L., C.-W.C. and M.-C.C.; Supervision, C.-S.L.; Validation, P.-L.T. and M.-C.C.; Visualization, P.-L.T.; Writing—review & editing, Y.-C.C. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

Council of Agriculture: 110-2.1.3-1.3-008.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Everett, S.; Slocum, S.L. Food and tourism: An effective partnership? A UK-based review. J. Sustain. Tour. 2013, 21, 789–809. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. McEntee, J. Contemporary and traditional localism: A conceptualisation of rural local food. Local Environ. 2010, 15, 785–803. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Hillel, D.; Belhassen, Y.; Shani, A. What makes a gastronomic destination attractive? Evidence from the Israeli Negev. Tour. Manag. 2013, 36, 200–209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Mykletun, R.J.; Gyimóthy, S. Beyond the renaissance of the traditional Voss sheep’s-head meal: Tradition, culinary art, scariness and entrepreneurship. Tour. Manag. 2010, 31, 434–446. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Sims, R. Food, Place and authenticity: Local food and the sustainable tourism experience. J. Sustain. Tour. 2009, 17, 321–336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Ferguson, G.M.; Iturbide, M.I. Family, food, and culture: Mothers’ perspectives on Americanization in Jamaica. Caribb. J. Psychol. 2015, 7, 43–63. [Google Scholar]
  7. Fusté-Forné, F. Seasonality in food tourism: Wild foods in peripheral areas. Tour. Geogr. 2019, 1–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Sumner, J. Contested sustainabilities: The post-carbon future of agri-food, rural development and sustainable place-making. J. Agric. Food Syst. Community Dev. 2019, 8, 219–220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Said-Allsopp, M.; Tallontire, A. Pathways to empowerment? dynamics of women’s participation in Global Value Chains. J. Clean. Prod. 2015, 107, 114–121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Cadzow, H.; Binns, T. Empowering freetown’s women farmers. Appl. Geogr. 2016, 74, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Jalkh, R.; Dedeire, M.; Desjardins, M.R. An introduction to food cooperatives in the bekaa valley, lebanon: Territorial actors and potential levers to local development through culinary heritage. Food Ethics 2020, 5, 20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Belahsen, R.; Naciri, K.; El Ibrahimi, A. Food security and women’s roles in Moroccan Berber (Amazigh) society today. Matern. Child Nutr. 2017, 13, e12562. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Sarkki, S.; Torre, C.D.; Fransala, J.; Živojinović, I.; Ludvig, A.; Górriz-Mifsud, E.; Melnykovych, M.; Sfeir, P.R.; Arbia, L.; Bengoumi, M.; et al. Reconstructive Social Innovation Cycles in Women-Led Initiatives in Rural Areas. Sustainability 2021, 13, 1231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Bessière, J. Local development and heritage: Traditional food and cuisine as tourist attractions in rural areas. Sociol. Rural. 1998, 38, 21–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Nyman, M. Food, meaning-making and ontological uncertainty: Exploring ‘urban foraging’and productive landscapes in London. Geoforum 2019, 99, 170–180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Carrillo, E.; Prado-Gascó, V.; Fiszman, S.; Varela, P. Why buying functional foods? Understanding spending behaviour through structural equation modelling. Food Res. Int. 2013, 50, 361–368. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Rinaldi, C. Food and gastronomy for sustainable place development: A multidisciplinary analysis of different theoretical approaches. Sustainability 2017, 9, 1748. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Chunhavuthiyanon, M.; Intarakumnerd, P. The role of intermediaries in sectoral innovation system: The case of Thailand’s food industry. Int. J. Technol. Manag. Sustain. Dev. 2014, 13, 15–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Lee, S.Y.; Díaz-Puente, J.M.; Vidueira, P. Enhancing Rural Innovation and Sustainability Through Impact Assessment: A Review of Methods and Tools. Sustainability 2020, 12, 6559. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Touzard, J.M.; Temple, L.; Faure, G.; Triomphe, B. Innovation systems and knowledge communities in the agriculture and agrifood sector: A literature review. J. Innov. Econ. Manag. 2015, 2, 117–142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Watts, N.; Scales, I.R. Seeds, Agricultural Systems and Socio-natures: Towards an Actor-Network Theory Informed Political Ecology of Agriculture. Geogr. Compass 2015, 9, 225–236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Shpykuliak, O.; Sakovska, O. Agricultural cooperation as an innovation for rural development. Balt. J. Econ. Stud. 2020, 6, 183–189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Florek, M.; Gazda, J. Traditional Food Products—Between Place Marketing, Economic Importance and Sustainable Development. Sustainability 2021, 13, 1277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Timothy, D.J.; Ron, A.S. Understanding heritage cuisines and tourism: Identity, image, authenticity, and change. J. Herit. Tour. 2013, 8, 99–104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Suárez-Ortega, M.; Gálvez-García, R. Motivations and decisive factors in women’s entrepreneurship. A gender perspective in education and professional guidance. Procedia-Soc. Behav. Sci. 2017, 237, 1265–1271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Moscatelli, S.; Gamboni, M.; Dernini, S.; Capone, R.; El Bilali, H.; Bottalico, F.; Debs, P.; Cardone, G. Exploring the socio-cultural sustainability of traditional and typical agro-food products: Case study of Apulia Region, South-eastern Italy. J. Food Nutr. Res. 2017, 5, 6–14. [Google Scholar]
  27. Almansouri, M.; Verkerk, R.; Fogliano, V.; Luning, P.A. Exploration of heritage food concept. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2021, 111, 790–797. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Wind, Y.; Saaty, T.L. Marketing applications of the analytic hierarchy process. Manag. Sci. 1980, 26, 641–658. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Chen, Y.C.; Yu, T.H.; Tsui, P.L.; Lee, C.S. A fuzzy AHP approach to construct international hotel spa atmosphere evaluation model. Qual. Quant. 2014, 48, 645–657. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Chaichana, T.; Brennan, C.S.; Osiriphun, S.; Thongchai, P.; Wangtueai, S. Development of local food growth logistics and economics. AIMS Agric. Food 2021, 6, 588–602. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Table 1. Analysis of the overall professionals’ weighting of the inheritance and management indicators of rural women’s sustainable food cooking skills.
Table 1. Analysis of the overall professionals’ weighting of the inheritance and management indicators of rural women’s sustainable food cooking skills.
AspectItemWeightRelative WeightRanking
Innovation competition
0.139
Participate in innovative cooking competitions using local ingredients0.1670.02719
Transform cuisines based on local ingredients from cooking competitions into recipes for inheritance0.2840.03617
Cook ingredients using traditional cooking techniques0.3380.0497
Observe and shadow the cooking competitions incorporating local ingredients0.2110.02720
Market operations
0.113
Able to make local ingredients into gourmet food for sale0.3370.03812
Able to process local ingredients into souvenirs0.2780.03715
Able to customize local ingredients in response to market demand0.2340.02422
Able to produce delicacies from local ingredients preferred by customers0.1520.01523
Trainings
0.328
Participate in training in the use of local ingredients organized by the Farmers’ Association0.3280.1121
Participate in the local gastronomy and cooking courses conducted by vocational training units0.1940.0644
Learn the cooking techniques of local ingredients from elders0.2250.0663
Refer to the media to use local ingredients to learn and refine culinary skills 0.1100.03616
Learn the innovative cooking techniques of well-known chefs using local ingredients0.1430.0506
Festival activities
0.152
Local ingredients are used for cooking during religious festivals0.1900.03318
Local ingredients are used for cooking at family dinners0.4010.0575
Local ingredients are used for cooking when friends visit for dinner0.2810.03714
Local ingredients are used for cooking when worshipping ancestors 0.1280.02521
Promotions
0.269
Pass on cuisines based on local ingredients to the next generation0.2740.0682
Pass on cuisines based on local ingredients to young people (school students)0.1590.03813
Introduce cuisines based on local ingredients to family and friends0.1650.0448
Print cuisines based on local ingredients in books0.1550.0419
Compile cuisines based on local ingredients into audio-visual teaching materials0.1310.03911
Cross-county, -city, and -regional exchange of cuisines based on local ingredients0.1150.03910
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Lee, C.-S.; Chen, Y.-C.; Tsui, P.-L.; Che, C.-W.; Chiang, M.-C. New Rural Women’s Power: Sustainable Rural Food Preparation Model Inheritance and Business Model. Biol. Life Sci. Forum 2021, 6, 42. https://doi.org/10.3390/Foods2021-11031

AMA Style

Lee C-S, Chen Y-C, Tsui P-L, Che C-W, Chiang M-C. New Rural Women’s Power: Sustainable Rural Food Preparation Model Inheritance and Business Model. Biology and Life Sciences Forum. 2021; 6(1):42. https://doi.org/10.3390/Foods2021-11031

Chicago/Turabian Style

Lee, Ching-Sung, Yen-Cheng Chen, Pei-Ling Tsui, Cheng-Wei Che, and Ming-Chen Chiang. 2021. "New Rural Women’s Power: Sustainable Rural Food Preparation Model Inheritance and Business Model" Biology and Life Sciences Forum 6, no. 1: 42. https://doi.org/10.3390/Foods2021-11031

APA Style

Lee, C. -S., Chen, Y. -C., Tsui, P. -L., Che, C. -W., & Chiang, M. -C. (2021). New Rural Women’s Power: Sustainable Rural Food Preparation Model Inheritance and Business Model. Biology and Life Sciences Forum, 6(1), 42. https://doi.org/10.3390/Foods2021-11031

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop