1. Introduction
Diabetes mellitus is a critical public health problem worldwide, and although it can be modified, it is a major risk factor for cardiovascular diseases, stroke, and cancer [
1,
2]. According to World Health Organization 2014 estimates, the prevalence of diabetes was 422 million, with 1.5 million deaths directly caused by diabetes [
3]. In 2014, 8.5% of adults aged 18 years and older had diabetes worldwide, particularly in low- and middle-income countries. In addition to cardiovascular diseases and cancer, diabetes mellitus is now an emergence public health problem in Serbia [
2,
4].
The prevalence of diabetes mellitus is attributed to the growth and aging of the population, as well as risk behaviors such as overweight, harmful use of alcohol, smoking tobacco, insufficient physical activity, long-term stress exposure, hereditary factors, etc. [
5]. Among the behavioral factors, dietary habits are of particular importance in the etiology of diabetes mellitus [
5,
6].
Numerous studies have shown that dietary habits may be associated with diabetes, but the results are inconsistent [
6,
7]. In addition, the relationship between diabetes and certain foods and dietary factors remains complex and unclear. This study assessed the relationship between dietary habits and diabetes mellitus prevalence in Serbia.
2. Materials and Methods
This research was designed as a secondary analysis of databases provided by the National Health Survey conducted in Serbia in 2013 [
8]. Data for this cross-sectional study were obtained from the National Survey of the Population of Serbia in 2013, which was carried out by the Ministry of Health of Serbia and the Institute of Public Health of Serbia “Dr Milan Jovanović Batut”. The research was carried in the period from 7 October 2013 to 30 December 2013.The study population included adults ≥ 15 years old who were permanent residents in the Republic of Serbia. The 2013 National Health Survey was performed in line with the EUROSTAT recommendations for the European Health Interview Survey.
We performed univariable logistic regression, where the independent variable was the diet, and the results are presented as odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Associations between diet and diabetes mellitus prevalence were evaluated separately among men and women. Statistical significance was considered when p < 0.050. All statistical analyses were performed using the Statistical Package for Social Sciences software (v. 20.0, SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA).
3. Results
The study sample consisted of 14,623 participants, 6759 (46.2%) men and 7864 (53.8%) women (
Table 1). About half of study participants had an urban place of residence and a moderate education level.
The prevalence of diabetes mellitus was 8.4%, significantly more frequent in women (8.9%) than in men (8.0%),
p = 0.049 (
Table 2).
The consumption of dairy products (OR = 1.15, 95% CI = 1.03–1.30;
p = 0.017) and fruits (OR = 1.31, 95% CI = 1.19–1.44;
p < 0.001) was associated with diabetes mellitus in males, whereas the consumption of margarine still reached statistical significance (OR = 5.33, 95% CI = 1.00–28.72;
p = 0.050) (
Table 3). The consumption of margarine was associated with a higher prevalence of diabetes mellitus in females (OR = 4.69, 95% CI = 1.35–16.32;
p = 0.015), as well as the use of lard (OR = 2.38, 95% CI = 1.10–5.12;
p = 0.027). A lower prevalence of diabetes mellitus in females was associated with bread consumption, including half-white bread (OR = 0.32, 95% CI = 0.12–0.88;
p = 0.027) and integral bread (OR = 0.27, 95% CI = 0.10–0.74;
p = 0.011). No association was found between vegetable and fish intakes and the prevalence of diabetes mellitus in either males or females.
4. Discussion
One of the main findings in this study was the high prevalence of diabetes mellitus in Serbia in both sexes. The consumption of dairy products and fruits was associated with diabetes mellitus in males, whereas the consumption of margarine still reached statistical significance. The consumption of lard and margarine was associated with a higher prevalence of diabetes mellitus in females. A lower prevalence of diabetes mellitus in females was associated with the consumption of half-white and integral bread. No association was found between vegetable and fish intakes and the prevalence of diabetes mellitus in either males or females.
The association between the consumption of food and diabetes mellitus has been found to vary in significance and magnitude across countries [
9]. In Latin America, the per capita consumption of milk showed a strong positive correlation with the incidence of childhood type 1 diabetes mellitus [
10]. Studies exploring the role of other dairy products as a heterogeneous food group (including specific low-fat and high-fat dairy foods, such as butter) in diabetes mellitus mortality have not yielded consistent results [
11].
Our results are consistent with findings from previous meta-analyses investigating the associations of high-fat versus low-fat diets and fatty acid intakes with the incidence of diabetes mellitus [
6]. Current dietary guidelines on the prevention of diabetes mellitus recommend a diet low in total fat and animal fat, and high in vegetable fat [
12]. Moreover, dose–response relationships have not yet been examined for the majority of these associations. In addition, substantial differences according to sex could be attributed to different exposures to lifestyle-related risk factors, such as smoking habits and obesity.
This study has some limitations. In addition to the well-known shortcomings of cross-sectional studies, such as ‘ecological fallacy’, there was a lack of control of confounding variables, and some of the collinearity and correlations may not be linear.
5. Conclusions
Dietary habits are of considerable importance for the prevalence of diabetes mellitus in Serbia. Consequently, adherence to a healthy dietary pattern at the population and individual level should be encouraged. Further epidemiological analytical studies are needed to investigate possible causative associations.
Author Contributions
Conceptualization, I.I., M.I. and S.K.; methodology, I.I., M.I. and S.K.; software, I.I., M.I. and S.K.; validation, I.I., M.I. and S.K.; formal analysis, I.I. and M.I.; investigation, I.I., M.I. and S.K.; resources, I.I., M.I. and S.K.; data curation, I.I., M.I. and S.K.; writing—original draft preparation, I.I.; writing—review and editing, I.I., M.I. and S.K.; visualization, I.I., M.I. and S.K.; supervision, M.I.; project administration, M.I. and S.K.; funding acquisition, M.I. and S.K. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Funding
This research received no external funding.
Institutional Review Board Statement
The study was conducted according to the guidelines of the Declaration of Helsinki, and approved by the Ethics Committee of the Faculty of Medical Sciences, University of Kragujevac (Ref. No.: 01-14321, 13 November 2017), entitled “Epidemiology of the most common health disorders”.
Informed Consent Statement
Not applicable.
Data Availability Statement
Data are contained within the article.
Acknowledgments
This study is supported by project No. 175042 supported by Ministry of Education, Science and Technological development, Republic of Serbia, 2011–2020.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
References
- Saeedi, P.; Petersohn, I.; Salpea, P.; Malanda, B.; Karuranga, S.; Unwin, N.; Colagiuri, S.; Guariguata, L.; Motala, A.A.; Ogurtsova, K.; et al. Global and regional diabetes prevalence estimates for 2019 and projections for 2030 and 2045: Results from the International Diabetes Federation Diabetes Atlas, 9th edition. Diabetes Res. Clin. Pract. 2019, 157, 107843. [Google Scholar] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Ilic, M.; Ilic, I. Diabetes mortality in Serbia, 1991–2015 (a nationwide study): A joinpoint regression analysis. Prim. Care Diabetes 2016, 11, 78–85. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
- World Health Organization. Diabetes. Available online: https://www.who.int/health-topics/diabetes#tab=tab_1 (accessed on 2 July 2021).
- Ilic, M.; Ilic, I.; Stojanovic, G.; Zivanovic-Macuzic, I. Association of the consumption of common food groups and beverages with mortality from cancer, ischaemic heart disease and diabetes mellitus in Serbia, 1991–2010: An ecological study. BMJ Open 2016, 6, e008742. [Google Scholar] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Zimmet, P.; Alberti, K.G.; Shaw, J. Global and societal implications of the diabetes epidemic. Nature 2001, 414, 782–787. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
- Neuenschwander, M.; Barbaresko, J.; Pischke, C.R.; Iser, N.; Beckhaus, J.; Schwingshackl, L.; Schlesinger, S. Intake of dietary fats and fatty acids and the incidence of type 2 diabetes: A systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis of prospective observational studies. PLoS Med. 2020, 17, e1003347. [Google Scholar]
- GBD 2019 Risk Factors Collaborators. Global burden of 87 risk factors in 204 countries and territories, 1990–2019: A systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019. Lancet 2020, 396, 1223–1249. [Google Scholar]
- Republic of Serbia, Ministry of Health, Institute of Public Health of Serbia “Dr Milan Jovanovic Batut”. Results of the National Health Survey of the Republic of Serbia, 2013; Republic of Serbia, Ministry of Health, Institute of Public Health of Serbia “Dr Milan Jovanovic Batut”: Belgrade, Serbia, 2014.
- Béjar Prado, L.M.; Gili, M.; Ramírez, G. Dietary changes and colorectal cancer trends in Spain during 1951–2007. Rev. Esp. Enferm. Dig. 2010, 102, 159–168. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
- Collado-Mesa, F.; Barceló, A.; Arheart, K.L.; Messiah, S.E. An ecological analysis of childhood-onset type 1 diabetes incidence and prevalence in Latin America. Rev. Panam. Salud Publica 2004, 15, 388–394. [Google Scholar]
- Patterson, E.; Larsson, S.C.; Wolk, A.; Åkesson, A. Association between dairy food consumption and risk of myocardial infarction in women differs by type of dairy food. J. Nutr. 2013, 143, 74–79. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
- Dyson, P.A.; Twenefour, D.; Breen, C.; Duncan, A.; Elvin, E.; Goff, L.; Hill, A.; Kalsi, P.; Marsland, N.; McArdle, P.; et al. Diabetes UK evidence-based nutrition guidelines for the prevention and management of diabetes. Diabet. Med. 2018, 35, 541–547. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
Table 1.
Characteristics of study respondents by age, Republic of Serbia, 2013.
Table 1.
Characteristics of study respondents by age, Republic of Serbia, 2013.
| | Males (n = 6759) | Females (n = 7864) | p |
---|
Variables | | No. (%) | No. (%) |
---|
Age groups (years) | | | | |
| 15–24 | 843 (12.5) | 879 (11.2) | |
| 25–34 | 937 (13.9) | 1024 (13.0) | |
| 35–44 | 1068 (15.8) | 1123 (14.3) | |
| 45–54 | 1055 (15.6) | 1273 (16.2) | |
| 55–64 | 1328 (19.6) | 1553 (19.7) | |
| 65–74 | 875 (12.9) | 1080 (13.7) | |
| 75–84 | 589 (8.7) | 796 (10.1) | |
| 85+ | 64 (0.9) | 136 (1.7) | 0.000 |
Place of residence | | | | |
| Urban | 3372 (5.1) | 4502 (57.2) | |
| Rural | 3037 (44.9) | 3362 (42.8) | 0.008 |
Education level | | | | |
| Low | 1673 (24.8) | 2954 (37.6) | |
| Middle | 3972 (58.8) | 3728 (47.4) | |
| High | 1114 (16.5) | 1182 (15.0) | 0.000 |
Table 2.
Prevalence of diabetes mellitus, by sex.
Table 2.
Prevalence of diabetes mellitus, by sex.
| | Diabetes Mellitus | |
---|
| | Absent | Present | |
---|
| | No. (%) | No. (%) | p |
---|
Sex | Males | 6199 (92.0) | 536 (8.0) | |
| Females | 7139 (91.1) | 695 (8.9) | 0.049 |
Total | | 13338 (91.6) | 1231 (8.4) | |
Table 3.
The association of dietary habits with diabetes mellitus prevalence, in Serbia, by sex: National Health Survey.
Table 3.
The association of dietary habits with diabetes mellitus prevalence, in Serbia, by sex: National Health Survey.
Prevalence of Diabetes Mellitus |
---|
| Males | Females |
---|
| | OR | (95% CI) | p Value | OR | (95% CI) | p Value |
---|
Dietary items | | | | | | | |
Dairy | | 1.15 | (1.03–1.30) | 0.017 | 1.07 | (0.97–1.19) | 0.190 |
Bread | |
| White | 1.89 | (0.66–5.38) | 0.234 | 0.58 | (0.21–1.59) | 0.291 |
| Half-white | 1.11 | (0.38–3.21) | 0.846 | 0.32 | (0.12–0.88) | 0.027 |
| Integral | 0.43 | (0.15–1.26) | 0.125 | 0.27 | (0.10–0.74) | 0.011 |
| All types | 1.56 | (0.54–4.51) | 0.413 | 0.41 | (0.15–1.13) | 0.085 |
| None | 1.00 * | | | 1.00 * | | |
Fat | | | | | | | |
| Lard | 2.00 | (0.77–5.18) | 0.153 | 2.38 | (1.10–5.12) | 0.027 |
| Margarine | 5.33 | (1.00–28.72) | 0.050 | 4.69 | (1.35–16.32) | 0.015 |
| Vegetable oil | 1.37 | (0.54–3.49) | 0.513 | 1.51 | (0.71–3.20) | 0.287 |
| None | 1.00 * | | | | | |
Fish | | 1.00 | (0.99–1.24) | 0.866 | 0.96 | (0.82–1.13) | 0.599 |
Fruits | | 1.31 | (1.19–1.44) | 0.000 | 0.97 | (0.88–1.03) | 0.259 |
Vegetables | | 1.10 | (0.99–1.24) | 0.083 | 1.01 | (0.91–1.12) | 0.837 |
| Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).