Next Article in Journal
Transcriptome Analysis of Cocos nucifera L. Seedlings Having Contrasting Water-Use Efficiency (WUE) under Water-Deficit Stress: Molecular Insights and Genetic Markers for Drought Tolerance
Previous Article in Journal
Mutation of MsSPL8 Alleles via CRISPR/Cas9-Mediated Genome Editing Leads to Superior Abiotic Stress Resiliency and Distinct Morphological Alterations in Alfalfa
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Proceeding Paper

Climatic Suitability for Haplodrassus rufipes in a Mediterranean Area: Linking a Predaceous Species to the Olive Grove †

by
Jacinto Benhadi-Marín
1,
José Alberto Pereira
1 and
Sónia A. P. Santos
2,*
1
Centro de Investigação de Montanha (CIMO), Instituto Politécnico de Bragança, Campus de Santa Apolónia, 5300-253 Bragança, Portugal
2
CIQuiBio, Barreiro School of Technology, Polytechnic Institute of Setúbal, 2839-001 Lavradio, Portugal
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Presented at the 1st International Electronic Conference on Plant Science, 1–15 December 2020; Available online: https://iecps2020.sciforum.net/.
Biol. Life Sci. Forum 2021, 4(1), 64; https://doi.org/10.3390/IECPS2020-08598
Published: 30 November 2020
(This article belongs to the Proceedings of The 1st International Electronic Conference on Plant Science)

Abstract

:
The use of natural enemies against crop pests has been promoted during the last decades. Efficient pest limitation relies on the overlap of the predator and the pest in time and space. In Portugal, the cultivation of the olive tree (Olea europaea L.) represents a key economic and cultural activity. Previous works highlighted the ground hunter spider Haplodrassus rufipes as a promising natural enemy against the olive fruit fly Bactrocera oleae, the main pest of the olive tree in northeastern Portugal. The objectives of this work were to approximate the distribution of H. rufipes throughout the whole Iberian Peninsula using its climatic suitability and compare it with the distribution of O. europaea. For this, a maximum entropy model at a 1-km resolution was developed. The distribution of O. europaea was visualized using a chorological map. The most contributing bioclimatic variable to the maxent model was the mean diurnal range. The distribution of O. europaea fairly overlapped with the highest values of the bioclimatic suitability of H. rufipes throughout the Iberian Peninsula.

1. Introduction

The olive grove agroecosystem is a relevant activity with a social and economic impact in Mediterranean areas threatened by the pressures of the socioeconomic current situation [1]. Although this ecosystem is usually considered somehow stable due to the stability of the environment, the tolerance of pest damage, a complex network of insects inhabiting the crop, and abundant natural enemies [1], the crop is not free of threats such as the attack of important pests. Among these, the monophagous frugivorous pest Bactrocera oleae (Rossi, 1790) (Diptera: Tephritidae), the olive fly, is one of the most pernicious, causing significant losses every year [2]. On the other hand, among the natural enemies of the olive fly, spiders raised interest as potential predators that could play a role in pest limitation, e.g., [3].
In the light of the diversity and ubiquity of spiders, efforts must be made in targeting those species or guilds (e.g., groups of species using the same hunting strategy) with the potential to successfully prey on the olive fly. In this context, the first condition to meet is that the species coincides in space with the crop range. To assess this relationship at a broad geographical scale, the use of species distribution models (SDM) represents a useful approach.
Species distribution models allow one to link occurrence data to environmental drivers through measures of the relationship between species and the environment [4]. The resulting maps represent habitat suitability values or probability values, depending on the underlying occurrence data (see [5]).
Haplodrassus rufipes (Lucas, 1846) (Araneae: Gnaphosidae) is a medium-sized active ground hunting spider (prosoma length 3.5 mm) [6]. Both sexes have been observed preying on adults and pupae of B. oleae in the laboratory [7]. Although it has been observed inhabiting olive crops in Portugal [7], the number of occurrence records reported for the Iberian Peninsula is still low. In this work, we aimed at developing an SDM able to predict the habitat suitability of H. rufipes throughout the Iberian Peninsula and to compare it with the range of O. europaea.

2. Experimental Section

The model was developed using R [8] using the machine-learning method maxent. This modelling procedure uses the maximum entropy to approximate the distribution of a species based on presence-only data [9]. We used the R implementation of maxent of the {dismo} package [10].
The bioclimatic variables used were obtained from the WorldClim database [11], a gridded climate database derived from monthly temperatures and rainfall. The bioclimatic data was used at a 0.5 min spatial resolution (~1 km2) (Table 1).
No selection of variables was done a priori (see [12]). However, the model was refitted using the three most contributing drivers after a first tuning procedure. The tuning of the maxent model followed Muscarella et al. (2014) [13] towards a balance of goodness-of-fit with model complexity and an evaluation of models with spatially independent data. The “checkerboard1” method for partitioning occurrence data was used to build a pool of 40 models corresponding to five combinations of feature classes (linear, quadratic, product, threshold, and hinge) and eight regularization multipliers (β) (0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 2.5, 3, 3.5, and 4). The selected optimal model was the one that achieved the lowest AIC (Akaike Information Criterion). For the optimal model, the AUC (area under the curve) was calculated and used as a measure of the predictive potential of the model [14]. The occurrence data was obtained from the GBIF (The Global Biodiversity Information Facility) database [15,16] and the chorological map of O. europaea from Caudullo et al. (2017) [17].

3. Results

The model that performed best was the one combining the linear, quadratic, hinge, and product features (LQHP) with a regularization multiplier β = 2 (Table A1). The model was developed using 1000 background points, 24 presence records for training, and seven for testing. This model gave an AIC = 978.37 and resulted in three parameters. The AUC was 0.69 ± 0.07 (SD). The percent contribution of the three bioclimatic drivers used was 71.10, 23.90, and 5.0% for the precipitation of the driest month, the temperature annual range, and the mean diurnal range, respectively.
The most suitable area for H.rufipes was found to correspond to the main Mediterranean climate areas throughout the Iberian Peninsula and mostly overlapped with the distribution of O. europaea (Figure 1). The response curve obtained for the most contributing bioclimatic variable, the precipitation of the driest month, decreased as the amount of precipitation increased (Figure 2).

4. Discussion

Species distribution models proved to be useful to evaluate the predicted range of potential natural enemies. Comparing this range with the geographical distribution of a crop can help to assess the feasibility of considering different species as potential natural enemies. In this work, the high amount of overlap of the distribution of spiders and crop suggest that further studies on the role of H. rufipes as a potential natural enemy in the olive grove agroecosystem are worthwhile. The amount of contribution of the precipitation of the driest month to the model suggests that this driver may significantly affect the life-cycle of H. rufipes. The strong decreasing pattern of habitat suitability as the precipitation increases suggests that this could be a species adapted to dry environments such as the Mediterranean ecosystem, especially during summer. This agrees with the adaptations of the olive grove to growing under dry conditions [18].

5. Conclusions

Research on the life-cycle and functional response of H. rufipes on B. oleae may allow for the parametrization of individual-based models and prediction of the rate of predation in the field, thus allowing one to evaluate the efficiency of spiders as agents of biological control.

Author Contributions

S.A.P.S., J.A.P. and J.B.-M. conceived the idea; J.B.-M. developed the model and prepared the figures, and all authors contributed to writing and reviewing the paper. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Data Availability Statement

Data are available from the authors upon reasonable request.

Acknowledgments

The authors are grateful to the Foundation for Science and Technology (FCT, Portugal) for financial support through the project “Gestão dos serviços de ecossistema no olival utilizando modelos espaciais avançados-OLIVESIM” PTDC/ASP-PLA/30003/2017.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Appendix A

Table A1. Outputs of the maxent model tuning for Haplodrassus rufipes. Bold text indicates the selected model with the lowest AIC. RM: Regularization multiplier.
Table A1. Outputs of the maxent model tuning for Haplodrassus rufipes. Bold text indicates the selected model with the lowest AIC. RM: Regularization multiplier.
ModelFeaturesRMAICParameters
1L0.5982.31853
2L1982.40303
3L1.5982.52693
4L2982.68563
5L2.5982.88163
6L3983.11313
7L3.5983.37923
8L4983.68343
9LQ0.5978.86993
10LQ1978.95903
11LQ1.5979.10443
12LQ2979.30693
13LQ2.5979.56273
14LQ3979.87373
15LQ3.5980.23523
16LQ4980.65153
17LQH0.5991.040910
18LQH1985.17347
19LQH1.5986.70456
20LQH2979.43203
21LQH2.5979.69563
22LQH3980.01273
23LQH3.5980.37773
24LQH4980.79513
25LQHP0.5992.549910
26LQHP1981.40685
27LQHP1.5982.48085
28LQHP2978.37023
29LQHP2.5982.28924
30LQHP3981.18153
31LQHP3.5982.84613
32LQHP4984.77573
33LQHPT0.51016.018517
34LQHPT1984.68577
35LQHPT1.5987.49577
36LQHPT2979.78484
37LQHPT2.5980.84714
38LQHPT3982.16434
39LQHPT3.5983.74394
40LQHPT4985.59824

References

  1. Loumou, A.; Giourga, C. Olive groves: The life and identity of the Mediterranean. Agric. Hum. Values 2003, 20, 87–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Malheiro, R.; Casal, S.; Baptista, P.; Pereira, J.A. A review of Bactrocera oleae (Rossi) impact in olive products: From the tree to the table. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2015, 44, 226–242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Picchi, M.S.; Bocci, G.; Petacchi, R.; Entling, M.H. Effects of local and landscape factors on spiders and olive fruit flies. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 2016, 222, 138–147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Guisan, A.; Zimmermann, N.E. Predictive habitat distribution models in ecology. Ecol. Model. 2000, 135, 147–186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Jiménez, L.; Soberón, J. Leaving the area under the receiving operating characteristic curve behind: An evaluation method for species distribution modelling applications based on presence-only data. Methods Ecol. Evol. 2020, 11, 1571–1586. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Nentwig, W.; Blick, T.; Bosmans, R.; Gloor, D.; Hänggi, A.; Kropf, C. Spiders of Europe. Version 11.2020. 2020. Available online: https://www.araneae.nmbe.ch (accessed on 20 October 2020).
  7. Benhadi-Marín, J.; (Centro de Investigação de Montanha, Bragança, Portugal); Pereira, J.A.; (Centro de Investigação de Montanha, Bragança, Portugal). Personal communication, 2020.
  8. R Core Team. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing; R Foundation for Statistical Computing: Vienna, Austria, 2019; Available online: http://www.R-project.org (accessed on 20 October 2020).
  9. Phillips, S.J.; Anderson, R.P.; Schapire, R.E. Maximum entropy modeling of species geographic distributions. Ecol. Model. 2006, 190, 231–259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Hijmans, R.J.; Phillips, S.; Leathwick, J.; Elith, J. Dismo: Species Distribution Modeling. R Package, Version 1.1-4. 2017. Available online: https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=dismo (accessed on 7 September 2020).
  11. Fick, S.E.; Hijmans, R.J. WorldClim 2: New 1km spatial resolution climate surfaces for global land areas. Int. J. Climatol. 2017, 37, 4302–4315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Feng, X.; Park, D.S.; Liang, Y.; Pandey, R.; Papeş, M. Collinearity in ecological niche modeling: Confusions and challenges. Ecol. Evol. 2019, 9, 10365–10376. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  13. Muscarella, R.; Galante, P.J.; Soley-Guardia, M.; Boria, R.A.; Kass, J.M.; Uriarte, M.; Anderson, R.P. ENMeval: An R package for conducting spatially independent evaluations and estimating optimal model complexity for Maxent ecological niche models. Methods Ecol. Evol. 2014, 5, 1198–1205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Merow, C.; Smith, M.J.; Silander, J.A. A practical guide toMaxent for modeling species’ distributions: What it does, and why inputs and settings matter. Ecography 2013, 36, 1058–1069. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. GBIF. The Global Biodiversity Information Facility. What Is GBIF? 2020. Available online: https://www.gbif.org/what-is-gbif (accessed on 1 November 2020).
  16. GBIF.org. GBIF Occurrence. 2020. Available online: https://doi.org/10.15468/dl.e3g5nm (accessed on 7 September 2020).
  17. Caudullo, G.; Welk, E.; San-Miguel-Ayanz, J. Chorological maps for the main European woody species. Data Brief 2017, 12, 662–666. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Fereres, E. Variability in adaptive mechanisms to water deficits in annual and perennial crop plants. Bull. Soc. Bot. Fr. Actual. Bot. 1984, 131, 17–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Figure 1. Bioclimatic suitability map for Haplodrassus rufipes in the Iberian Peninsula. Blue dots represent occurrence records. The black line represents the contour of the chorological map of Olea europaea.
Figure 1. Bioclimatic suitability map for Haplodrassus rufipes in the Iberian Peninsula. Blue dots represent occurrence records. The black line represents the contour of the chorological map of Olea europaea.
Blsf 04 00064 g001
Figure 2. Response curve (habitat suitability) of Haplodrassus rufipes according to the precipitation of the driest month in the Iberian Peninsula.
Figure 2. Response curve (habitat suitability) of Haplodrassus rufipes according to the precipitation of the driest month in the Iberian Peninsula.
Blsf 04 00064 g002
Table 1. Description of bioclimatic variables provided by the WorldClim database.
Table 1. Description of bioclimatic variables provided by the WorldClim database.
Code in DatabaseBioclimatic Variable
bio1Annual mean temperature
bio2Mean diurnal range (mean of monthly (max temp − min temp))
bio3Isothermality (bio2/bio7) (×100)
bio4Temperature seasonality (standard deviation × 100)
bio5Max temperature of warmest month
bio6Min temperature of coldest month
bio7Temperature annual range (bio5–bio6)
bio8Mean temperature of wettest quarter
bio9Mean temperature of driest quarter
bio10Mean temperature of warmest quarter
bio11Mean temperature of coldest quarter
bio12Annual precipitation
bio13Precipitation of wettest month
bio14Precipitation of driest month
bio15Precipitation seasonality (coefficient of variation)
bio16Precipitation of wettest quarter
bio17Precipitation of driest quarter
bio18Precipitation of warmest quarter
bio19Precipitation of coldest quarter
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Benhadi-Marín, J.; Pereira, J.A.; Santos, S.A.P. Climatic Suitability for Haplodrassus rufipes in a Mediterranean Area: Linking a Predaceous Species to the Olive Grove. Biol. Life Sci. Forum 2021, 4, 64. https://doi.org/10.3390/IECPS2020-08598

AMA Style

Benhadi-Marín J, Pereira JA, Santos SAP. Climatic Suitability for Haplodrassus rufipes in a Mediterranean Area: Linking a Predaceous Species to the Olive Grove. Biology and Life Sciences Forum. 2021; 4(1):64. https://doi.org/10.3390/IECPS2020-08598

Chicago/Turabian Style

Benhadi-Marín, Jacinto, José Alberto Pereira, and Sónia A. P. Santos. 2021. "Climatic Suitability for Haplodrassus rufipes in a Mediterranean Area: Linking a Predaceous Species to the Olive Grove" Biology and Life Sciences Forum 4, no. 1: 64. https://doi.org/10.3390/IECPS2020-08598

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop