Next Article in Journal
Potential Probiotic Bacillus Strains Isolated from Contaminated Soil in North Macedonia: Salmonella Growth Inhibition
Previous Article in Journal
Phycoerythrin from Porphyridium purpureum: Highly Efficient Extraction, Purification, and Microencapsulation for Food Applications
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Proceeding Paper

Assay Development for Phagocytosis Activity Evaluation †

Resource Center for Cell Technology and Immunology, Sirius University of Science and Technology, Olimpiyskiy Ave. b.1, Sirius 354340, Russia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Presented at the 2nd International Electronic Conference on Microbiology, 1–15 December 2023; Available online: https://ecm2023.sciforum.net.
Biol. Life Sci. Forum 2024, 31(1), 15; https://doi.org/10.3390/ECM2023-16444
Published: 30 November 2023
(This article belongs to the Proceedings of The 2nd International Electronic Conference on Microbiology)

Abstract

:
The efficiency of phagocytic activity is a significant organism indicator which decreases with the aging of the immune system. Medications are able to influence phagocytosis, having a blocking or activating effect, and therefore are important modulators of immune function. We are developing an ex vivo assay indispensable for medication screening in human and Macaca fascicularis whole blood. For assay verification, several published control drugs were successfully used. This assay assists with finding medications for enhancing the immune response in elderly people and providing a deeper comprehension of the fundamental process of immune system aging.

1. Introduction

The increased risk of developing age-related diseases in elderly people is associated with an imbalance and deficiency in immune response; therefore, specific treatment and vaccination approaches should be developed. The efficiency of phagocytic activity is a significant organism indicator which decreases with the aging of the immune system. Medications are able to influence phagocytosis, having a blocking or activating effect, and are important modulators of immune function. We are developing an ex vivo assay indispensable for medication screening in human and Macaca fascicularis whole blood. M.fascicularis is a well-recognized preclinical model with human-like immune responses. For assay verification, several published control drugs [1] were successfully used for the blocking and acceleration of phagocytosis. Experiments evaluating human and animal phagocytosis indices at different ages will provide statistical standards to be used for medication preclinical and clinical trials. This assay assists with finding medications for enhancing the immune response and antigen presentation in elderly people. Moreover, the screening of medications with an impact on phagocytosis and further studies of their mechanisms will assist in providing a deeper comprehension of the fundamental process of immune system aging and a perspective for immune response correction.

2. Materials and Methods

The object for phagocytosis was E. coli stained in-house with FITC (Lumiprobe) for 3 h at 37 °C. Phagocytosis was carried out in whole blood without adhesion [2] under near physiological conditions (T = 37 °C, 5% CO2). After 1 h of incubation with E. coli, cells were treated with Protein transport inhibitor, containing monensin (BD GolgiStop), according to the instructions, placed on ice, or treated with a combination of lidocaine (0.1–3 mg/mL) and epinephrine (0.34–10.2 μM) [1] for 5 min. Then, the erythrocytes were lysed with BD Pharm Lyse according to the instructions. Furthermore, cells were pre-treated with these agents for 5 min before adding bacteria. A sample analysis was performed on a BD LSRFortessa flow cytometer. To correctly identify leucocytes, CD45 APC-eFluor780 (HI30, eBioscience; 1:100) was used.

3. Results and Discussion

Pre-treated with different agents, blood cells were incubated with E. coli as described; after that, the percentage of phagocytosed cells (PC; activated monocytes or granulocytes, as the most prominent phagocytosed populations) was evaluated (Figure 1).
In comparison to the non-treated cells (PC ~ 33%), the treated cells’ phagocytic activity plummeted (PC 4.6–20.8%) and the lidocaine-epinephrine treatment showed a dose-dependent decrease, effectively blocking phagocytosis in the same manner as commercial GolgiStop in its optimal concentration. This trend was linear for both granulocytes and monocytes (R2 = 0.972 and R2 = 0.997, respectively, Figure 2).
Moreover, treatment after 1 h of incubation with E. coli was indistinguishable from the control sample without inhibitors of phagocytosis (Figure 3).
Despite there being no difference, this can be used in modifications of phagocytic dynamic tests where both engulfed and adhered bacteria are detected in a defined timelapse. In the case of phagocytosis being stopped on ice, the percentage of PC was lower in comparison with the treated and non-treated samples, and it can be supposed that cells undergo degranulation and cell death on ice. Further analysis confirmed that the degranulation and death of phagocytosed cells on ice occurs, which additionally validates the usage of chemical agents to block phagocytosis.

4. Conclusions

Lidocaine-epinephrine mixture inhibits phagocytosis and, if necessary, can be used as a stop-reagent as a cheaper and effective analogue to commercial reagents and ice. A phagocytic activity evaluation with FITC-conjugated bacteria and a developed protocol in whole blood suggested its use as an essential part of medication screening. The validation of perspective medications is recommended for elderly people whose phagocytosis is impaired. Moreover, phagocytosis testing in whole blood under near physiological conditions offers a useful and feasible approach for personalized medicine.

Author Contributions

Authors’ contribution: E.L., A.S., S.C. and V.L.—conducting experiments; E.L., A.S. and V.L.—calculation and analysis of research results; E.L. and S.R.—manuscript writing; E.L., A.S., S.C., V.L. and S.R.—editing the text of the article; S.R.—conceptualization and research management. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The work was carried out with the support of the Russian Science Foundation, project No. 23-15-00443 (https://rscf.ru/project/23-15-00443/ accessed date 29 November 2023).

Institutional Review Board Statement

All procedures performed in the study involving human subjects complied with national ethical standards, the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki and its subsequent amendments and was approved by the Bioethics Committee of Sirius University (protocol dated 3 June 2023).

Informed Consent Statement

Informed voluntary consent was obtained from all individuals participating in the study to use the obtained data for publication before taking blood samples. The data was used and processed on the basis of anonymity and protection of personal data in accordance with national legislation.

Data Availability Statement

All data presented in this manuscript, such as flow cytometry and haemoanalyser files or other manual entries in workbooks, are available on request and in accordance with the Federal Law (Russian Federation of 27 July 2006 N 152-FZ).

Acknowledgments

The authors thank the Resource Center for Cellular Technologies and Immunology of the Sirius University of Science and Technology for assistance in carrying out the work and for providing equipment.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest, financial or otherwise. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript; or in the decision to publish the results.

References

  1. Azuma, Y.; Wang, P.L.; Shinohara, M.; Ohura, K. Differentiation by in vitro treatment of lidocaine–epinephrine and prilocaine–felypressine in neutrophils. Immunol. Lett. 2001, 77, 151–158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Garcia-Seyda, N.; Seveau, V.; Manca, F.; Biarnes-Pelicot, M.; Valignat, M.P.; Bajenoff, M.; Theodoly, O. Human neutrophils swim and phagocytise bacteria. Biol. Cell 2021, 113, 28–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Evaluation of activated cells percentage, while treated for 5 min with phagocytic activity inhibitors before phagocytosis modulation. * BD GolgiStop = BD GolgiStop™ Protein Transport Inhibitor (Containing Monensin). L = Lidocaine concentration (mg/mL). E = Epinephrine concentration (μM).
Figure 1. Evaluation of activated cells percentage, while treated for 5 min with phagocytic activity inhibitors before phagocytosis modulation. * BD GolgiStop = BD GolgiStop™ Protein Transport Inhibitor (Containing Monensin). L = Lidocaine concentration (mg/mL). E = Epinephrine concentration (μM).
Blsf 31 00015 g001
Figure 2. Linear dependence of activated cells percentage on lidocaine-epinephrine concentrations. L = Lidocaine concentration (mg/mL). E = Epinephrine concentration (μM).
Figure 2. Linear dependence of activated cells percentage on lidocaine-epinephrine concentrations. L = Lidocaine concentration (mg/mL). E = Epinephrine concentration (μM).
Blsf 31 00015 g002
Figure 3. Linear dependence of activated cells percentage on lidocaine-epinephrine concentrations. * BD GolgiStop = BD GolgiStop™ Protein Transport Inhibitor (Containing Monensin). L = Lidocaine concentration (mg/mL). E = Epinephrine concentration (μM).
Figure 3. Linear dependence of activated cells percentage on lidocaine-epinephrine concentrations. * BD GolgiStop = BD GolgiStop™ Protein Transport Inhibitor (Containing Monensin). L = Lidocaine concentration (mg/mL). E = Epinephrine concentration (μM).
Blsf 31 00015 g003
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Lysakova, E.; Shumeev, A.; Laktyushkin, V.; Chuvpilo, S.; Rybtsov, S. Assay Development for Phagocytosis Activity Evaluation. Biol. Life Sci. Forum 2024, 31, 15. https://doi.org/10.3390/ECM2023-16444

AMA Style

Lysakova E, Shumeev A, Laktyushkin V, Chuvpilo S, Rybtsov S. Assay Development for Phagocytosis Activity Evaluation. Biology and Life Sciences Forum. 2024; 31(1):15. https://doi.org/10.3390/ECM2023-16444

Chicago/Turabian Style

Lysakova, Elena, Alexander Shumeev, Victor Laktyushkin, Sergey Chuvpilo, and Stanislav Rybtsov. 2024. "Assay Development for Phagocytosis Activity Evaluation" Biology and Life Sciences Forum 31, no. 1: 15. https://doi.org/10.3390/ECM2023-16444

APA Style

Lysakova, E., Shumeev, A., Laktyushkin, V., Chuvpilo, S., & Rybtsov, S. (2024). Assay Development for Phagocytosis Activity Evaluation. Biology and Life Sciences Forum, 31(1), 15. https://doi.org/10.3390/ECM2023-16444

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop