Next Article in Journal
Machine Learning Approach towards the Early Warning of Cyanobacterial Blooms in Drinking Water Reservoirs
Previous Article in Journal
Genetic Diversity and Population Structure Assessed by SSR in a Peruvian Germplasm Collection of Loche Squash (Cucurbita moschata, Cucurbitaceae)
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Proceeding Paper

Available P Enhancement in Andisols under Pasture and Rock Phosphate Amended with Poultry Manure †

by
Patricia Poblete-Grant
1,2,*,
Rolando Demanet
1,
María de La Luz Mora
1 and
Cornelia Rumpel
2,*
1
Center of Plant, Soil Interaction and Natural Resources Biotechnology, Scientific and Biotechnological Bioresource Nucleus (BIOREN-UFRO), Universidad de La Frontera, Temuco 4780000, Chile
2
CNRS, SU, Institute of Ecology and Environmental Sciences of Paris (IEES, UMR SU-UPEC-CNRS-INRA-IRD), Campus AgroParis Tech, 78850 Thiverval-Grignon, France
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Presented at the 1st International Electronic Conference on Agronomy, 3–17 May 2021; Available online: https://iecag2021.sciforum.net/.
Biol. Life Sci. Forum 2021, 3(1), 62; https://doi.org/10.3390/IECAG2021-09676
Published: 1 May 2021
(This article belongs to the Proceedings of The 1st International Electronic Conference on Agronomy)

Abstract

:
Poultry manure (PM) is a great nutrient source for plant growth. PM enhances soil properties and increases the crop yield. As an important strategy to decrease the amount of inorganic phosphorus (P) fertilizers, the combined use of rock phosphate (RP) with PM has been found to be more advantageous for sustainable agriculture than their single use. The objective was to assess the effect of PM on P availability in Andisols and RP dissolution. In the first incubation, an Andisol was mixed with 100, 200, and 300 mg P kg−1 rate using PM, and Olsen P was determined at 1, 3, 5, 7, and 10 days. In the second experiment, four Andisols were incubated with 200 and 300 mg P kg−1 soil for 20 days and acid phosphatase activity (APase) was measured. In the last experiment, PM and rock phosphate (RP) were mixed at two different rates: 50:50 and 70:30 for 30 days and total inorganic P was determined. We found that Andisols amended with PM increased P availability and APase, and the mixture of PM:RP at 70:30 showed the highest inorganic P. We therefore conclude that PM addition may improve P availability in soil as well as in combination with RP.

1. Introduction

Dairy and meat production in Southern Chile are based on the use of permanent pastures established on Andisols as the main source of food for cattle [1]. These soils have andic properties and immobilize highly reactive phosphate anions through sorption and/or precipitation with cations such as Al and Fe [2,3,4]. As a result of this immobilization, phosphorus (P) available for plant uptake in soil solution is very low. In Southern Chile, 91% of the 1.3 million ha of pasture are naturalized, where a total of 48% is under grazing and does not receive any type of fertilizers to compensate for the nutritional losses [5]. Thus, improving pasture production by fertilization management on Andisols is a major concern that must be approached in a sustainable manner [5,6]. Lately, the combined use of low P-available rock phosphate (RP) fertilizers with organic manures has resulted in increased P availability and crop yields [7,8,9,10]. Among organic manures, poultry manure (PM) is a great source of plant macro- and micronutrients and may have an important effect on the soils’ physicochemical properties [7,11,12,13] and some biological properties, such as the activity of acid phosphatases (APase) enzymes [12,14,15]. Is an important issue to consider that PM applied to soil will improve soil properties and increase crop production, while providing a way to reuse waste material from broiler production. The latter represents an important strategy under the context of circular economy by adding value to this waste and, thus, decreasing the amount of inorganic P fertilizer application. The aim of this study was to assess the effect of PM on P availability in Andisols under pastures as well as in the dissolution of RP.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Characterization of Poultry Manure

Chemical Characterization

Composted poultry manure (PM) was homogenized, freeze-dried, ground to pass 2 mm, and stored at −20 °C until use. Chemical analyses were performed in accordance with the methodology described by Sadzawka et al. [16]. Total P was determined in extracts by alkaline digestion with sodium hypobromite (NaBrO) in accordance with the methodology of Dick and Tabatabai [17] and determined through a spectrophotometer at 880 nm following the method of Murphy and Riley [18]. Selected poultry manure properties are showed in Table 1.

2.2. Soil Sampling

One soil sample was collected from Santa Elena farm, located 50 km from Temuco city, in Freire (La Araucanía region, Chile). Soil belonged to the Barros Arana series (BAR), classified as Typic Hapludand (Table 2). Soil was sieved (2 mm), air-dried, and stored at room temperature. In addition, four soil samples were collected from pasture farms belonging to the Cunco (CUN), Villarrica (VILL1 and VILL2), and Los Lagos (LLA) series (Table 2).

2.3. Incubation Assays

2.3.1. Effect of Poultry Manure on Soil P availability

We carried out three incubation experiments. Firstly, we incubated an Andisol belonging to the Barros Arana series (BAR) with poultry manure to assess its effect on available P. Briefly, 1 kg of bulk soil was moistened to field capacity in polyethylene bags. Soil was then thoroughly mixed with PM using three replicates to provide 100 (PM100), 200 (PM200), and 300 (PM300) mg P kg−1 soil (2.5, 5.0, and 7.5 g PM kg−1 dry soil). Additionally, unfertilized soil was used as control. Soil was incubated under controlled conditions at 25 °C. Subsamples were taken at 1, 3, 5, 7, and 10 days after incorporation and soil-available P was measured according to Olsen and Sommers [19] by extracting 2.5 g of soil with 0.5 M of sodium bicarbonate (pH 8.5) for 30 min and measuring, by spectrophotometry at 880 nm, according to the Murphy and Riley [18] method.

2.3.2. Effect of Poultry Manure on Soil P Enzyme Activity

The second incubation experiment was performed in order to test the poultry manure effect on Andisol acid phosphatase activity. The four Andisols corresponding to Cunco (CUN), Villarrica (VILL1 and VILL2), and Los Lagos (LLA) (Table 2) were sieved (2 mm), air-dried, and stored at room temperature. Each soil sample was incubated using 1 kg of soil, in three replicates, and mixed at two PM rates of 200 (PM200) and 300 (PM300) mg P kg−1 soil for 30 days at 25 °C. Acid phosphatase activity (APase) was determined following p-nitrophenol release (p-NP) according to the methodology of Tabatabai and Bremer [19] modified by Rubio et al. [20].

2.3.3. Effect of Poultry Manure on P Availability from Rock Phosphate

In the third incubation, we quantified the available P of rock phosphate mixed with poultry manure. Rock phosphate was highly reactive [21] with a marine sedimentary origin (Bahia inglesa) [22] and its selected properties are listed in Table 3. PM and RP were combined, in three replicates, at 50:50 and 70:30 ratios. Samples were moistened in polyethylene bags and incubated at 25 °C for 30 days. Total inorganic P content was then measured after 0.5 M sodium bicarbonate (pH 8.5) extraction for 16 h and determined using the Murphy and Riley [18] method.

2.4. Statistical Analyses

Data was normality- and homogeneity-checked using the Shapiro–Wilk and Levene tests. Significant differences (p ≤ 0.05) between treatments and sampling days were performed by two-ways ANOVA followed by post hoc Tukey test using the R statistical platform (R foundation for statistical computing version 3.6.3).

3. Results

3.1. Available P in an Andisol Amended with Poultry Manure

PM treatments highly increased the soil-available P in BAR soil from the first day of incubation (Figure 1). In the BAR soil, the available P varied between 10.4–31.8 mg kg−1 for PM100, 36.6–65.9 mg kg−1 for PM200, and 44.5–131.9 mg kg−1 for PM300. Soil-available P was significantly (p ≤ 0.05) improved by increasing PM rate at 200 PM and 300 PM. The highest values were shown in the BAR soil amended with PM300 on the third sampling day. Then, available P decreased for the 200 PM and 300 PM treatments, but maintained higher values than control. For the BAR soil amended with 100 PM treatment, available P did not show any differences compared to the control until the fifth day, while in the seventh and tenth day, available P increased significantly.

3.2. Acid Phosphatase Activity in Andisols Amended with Poultry Manure

The incubation of soil with different rates of PM results in an important increase of acid phosphatase (APase) activity after 10 days (Figure 2). APase activity in the four Andisols ranged from 246 to 743 mg p-NP kg−1 h−1. The 300 PM treatment obtained the highest APase activity in CUN, VILL1, and VILL2 soils, while in the LLA soil, the 200 PM and 300 PM treatments showed similar values. Among unfertilized soils, VILL2 showed the highest APase activity, followed by VILL1, LLA, and CUN.

3.3. Available P in the Mixture of Poultry Manure and Rock Phosphate

The increase of available P was calculated as the difference between the initial values of available P in the PM and RP and values obtained by the mixtures at each sampled day (Figure 3). Initial available P of PM was 2440 mg kg−1, while RP showed the lowest value of 156 mg kg−1. PM and RP mixed at a 50:50 ratio showed the highest increase in P availability at the 1st day, followed similarly by the 20th and 30th day and, finally, by the 10th day. On the other hand, in the 70:30 ratio, the greatest values of available P occurred similarly after the 1st and 30th day, followed by the 10th and, finally, the 20th day. Available P released from the PM:RP mixture was increased at the 30th day. PM and RP mixed at a 70:30 ratio was higher in P availability on all sampling days compared to 50:50 ratio.

4. Discussion

We assessed the poultry manure effect on P availability in Andisols as well as from the dissolution of rock phosphate through investigating three incubation experiments. Our results showed that the greatest values of available P were obtained by amending Andisol with the highest PM rates (200 to 300 mg P kg−1). In practical terms, treatments used in this study represented 4.2, 8.5, and 12.7 Mg of PM ha−1, which is a very high P input. These results are in accordance with the study performed by Waldrip et al. [12], who amended a Typic Haplorthod soil with 42.6 Mg of PM ha−1. In addition, Blair et al. [14] indicated that, in a Typic Fragiudult, a PM amendment corresponding to more than 56 kg P ha−1 was sufficient to increase the soluble P pool. Moreover, they found that acid phosphatase (APase) activity was increased immediately, which was attributed to the organic matter input from PM. We found that the APase activity was also improved in the four assessed soils following PM treatments. APase activity in soils is associated to macromolecular organic P solubilization leading to its utilization by plants which mainly occurs under P-deficient conditions, while lately, this was also reported in P-sufficient soils receiving organic manures [15]. Thus, the improvement effect of PM on the P availability of soil could additionally exert an enhancement of APase activity in Andisols. Accordingly, Poblete-Grant et al. [13] studied the long-term effect of PM applied in Andisols, concluding that increases in the P availability of soil could be associated with a remobilization from P contained in less available pools, direct P input from the amendment, or by decreases of P-sorption sites.
In order to decrease the amount of PM used, we suggested the combined application with rock phosphate (RP) in 50:50 and 70:30 mixtures. We found that, from the first day, available P was highly increased in the mixture of 70:30, which might be attributed to the organic acids released during PM decomposition and microorganisms existing in this amendment [9]. Additionally, Abbasi et al. [7] reported an 80% increase in P release from RP when applied in combination with PM (50:50) compared to its application alone, which might be explained by higher microbial activity due to amendment with organic manures. On the contrary, Mahimairaja et al. [10] reported low levels of RP dissolution mainly attributed to small amounts of protons released during nitrification processes or/and high concentrations of calcium. However, our findings showed that rock phosphate mixed with poultry manure increased the amount of available P considerably, which might enhance its fertilizer efficiency to provide P to plants. Poblete-Grant et al. [8] reported that soil microbial biomass P was greatly increased by combination of RP with PM compared to its single application. We therefore suggest that poultry manure could be a suitable P fertilizer to increase either available P or acid phosphatase activity in Andisols, as well as inorganic P from the low-P amendments such as rock phosphate.

5. Conclusions

The results obtained in the three experiments evidenced the enhanced effect of the organic manure in different aspects. Firstly, the use of this organic material increased the availability of P in an Andisol. Moreover, soil biological activity of phosphatase enzyme was promoted in several Andisols under organic fertilization. Finally, the synergistic effect of poultry manure on P availability released from rock phosphate could decrease the use of this non-renewable source. We therefore concluded that poultry manure addition might be an alternative source to maintain agriculture production in Andisols through the improvement of soil fertility and its biological condition. However, long-term results will be necessary to analyze the combined effect of poultry manure and rock phosphate in field conditions.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/IECAG2021-09676/s1.

Author Contributions

M.d.L.L.M., R.D. and P.P.-G. designed the experiment. P.P.-G. conducted the experiment. P.P.-G., C.R. and M.d.L.L.M. analyzed the data and wrote the manuscript. P.P.-G., C.R. and M.d.L.L.M. reviewed the manuscript. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by ANID scholarship n° 21150715, and by ECOS C13U02, and FONDECYT 3210228, 1181050 projects.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

Authors are grateful for the support of the Soil and Plant Laboratory and the Scientific and Technological Bioresource Nucleus (BIOREN). In addition, to Pucalan for providing the poultry manure compost used in this research. Finally, acknowledgments are given to the FONDECYT project N°3210228.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no financial or non-financial conflict of interest, and that this article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals.

References

  1. Demanet, R.; Mora, M.D.L.L.; Herrera, M.Á.; Miranda, H.; Barea, J.M. Seasonal variation of the productivity and quality of permanent pastures in Adisols of temperate regions. J. Soil Sci. Plant Nutr. 2015, 15, 111–128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  2. Borie, F.; Aguilera, P.; Castillo, C.; Valentine, A.; Seguel, A.; Barea, J.M.; Cornejo, P. Revisiting the Nature of Phosphorus Pools in Chilean Volcanic Soils as a Basis for Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Management in Plant P Acquisition. J. Soil Sci. Plant Nutr. 2019, 19, 390–401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Redel, Y.; Cartes, P.; Demanet, R.; Velásquez, G.; Poblete-Grant, P.; Bol, R.; Mora, M.L. Assessment of phosphorus status influenced by Al and Fe compounds in volcanic grassland soils. J. Soil Sci. Plant Nutr. 2016, 16, 490–506. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  4. Velásquez, G.; Calabi-Floody, M.; Poblete-Grant, P.; Rumpel, C.; Demanet, R.; Condron, L.; Mora, M.L. Fertilizer effects on phosphorus fractions and organic matter in andisols. J. Soil Sci. Plant Nutr. 2016, 16, 294–304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  5. Dörner, J.; Zúñiga, F.; López, I. Short-term effects of different pasture improvement treatments on the physical quality of an andisol. J. Soil Sci. Plant Nutr. 2013, 13, 381–399. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Rumpel, C.; Crème, A.; Ngo, P.; Velásquez, G.; Mora, M.; Chabbi, A. The impact of grassland management on biogeochemical cycles involving carbon, nitrogen and phosphorus. J. Soil Sci. Plant Nutr. 2015, 15, 353–371. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Abbasi, M.K.; Musa, N.; Manzoor, M. Mineralization of soluble P fertilizers and insoluble rock phosphate in response to phosphate-solubilizing bacteria and poultry manure and their effect on the growth and P utilization efficiency of chilli (Capsicum annuum L.). Biogeosciences 2015, 12, 4607–4619. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Poblete-Grant, P.; Biron, P.; Bariac, T.; Cartes, P.; Mora, M.L.; Rumpel, C. Synergistic and antagonistic effects of poultry manure and phosphate rock on soil P availability, ryegrass production, and P uptake. Agronomy 2019, 9, 191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Khan, M.; Sharif, M. Solubility Enhancement of Phosphorus from Rock Phosphate through Composting with Poultry Litter. Sarhad J. Agric. 2012, 28, 415–420. [Google Scholar]
  10. Mahimairaja, S.; Bolan, N.S.; Hedley, M.J. Dissolution of phosphate rock during the composting of poultry manure: An incubation experiment. Fertil. Res. 1994, 40, 93–104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Dikinya, O.; Mufwanzala, N. Chicken manure-enhanced soil fertility and productivity: Effects of application rates. J. Soil Sci. Environ. Manag. 2010, 1, 46–54. [Google Scholar]
  12. Waldrip, H.M.; He, Z.; Erich, M.S. Effects of poultry manure amendment on phosphorus uptake by ryegrass, soil phosphorus fractions and phosphatase activity. Biol. Fertil. Soils 2011, 47, 407–418. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Poblete-Grant, P.; Suazo-Hernández, J.; Condron, L.; Rumpel, C.; Demanet, R.; Malone, S.L.; Mora, M.L. Soil available P, soil organic carbon and aggregation as affected by long-term poultry manure application to Andisols under pastures in Southern Chile. Geoderma Reg. 2020, 21, e00271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Blair, R.M.; Savin, M.C.; Chen, P. Phosphatase activities and available nutrients in soil receiving pelletized poultry litter. Soil Sci. 2014, 179, 182–189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Starnes, D.L.; Padmanabhan, P.; Sahi, S.V. Effect of P sources on growth, P accumulation and activities of phytase and acid phosphatases in two cultivars of annual ryegrass (Lolium multiflorum L.). Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2008, 46, 580–589. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Sadzawka, A.R.; Carrasco, M.A.; Grez, R.Z.; Mora, M.D.L.L. Métodos de Análisis de Compost; de Serie, A., Ed.; Instituto de Investigaciones Agropecuarias: Santiago, Chile, 2005. [Google Scholar]
  17. Dick, W.A.; Tabatabai, M.A. Determination of orthophosphate in aqueous solutions containing labile organic and inorganic phosphorus compounds. J. Environ. Qual. 1977, 6, 82–85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Murphy, B.; Riley, J.P. A modified single solution method for the determination of phosphate in natural waters. Anal. Chim. Acta 1962, 27, 31–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Olsen, S.R.; Sommers, L.E. Phosphorus. In Methods of Soil Analysis: Part 2. Chemical and Microbiological Properties; American Society of Agronomy, Inc.: Madison, WI, USA, 1982; pp. 403–427. [Google Scholar]
  20. Tabatabai, M.A.; Bremner, J.M. Use of p-nitrophenyl phosphate for assay of soil phosphatase activity. Soil Biol. Biochem. 1969, 1, 301–307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Rubio, R.; Moraga, E.; Borie, F. Acid phosphatase activity and vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhizal infection associated with roots of four wheat cultivars. J. Soil Sc. Plant Nutr. 1990, 13, 585–598. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Rojas, C. Comparison of Chilean natural phosphatic minerals. J. Soil Sc. Plant Nutr. 2006, 2, 28–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Figure 1. Soilavailable P from an unfertilized (control) Andisol (Barros Arana series: BAR) or following different poultry manure rates: 100 PM (100 mg P kg−1 soil), 200 PM (200 mg P kg−1 soil), and 300 PM (300 mg P kg−1 soil) at different sampling days (1, 3, 5, 7, and 10). Lowercase letters indicate significant differences (p < 0.05) between the treatments on the same sampling day and capital letters indicate significant differences (p < 0.05) of sampling day in the same treatment (two-way ANOVA followed by Tukey test).
Figure 1. Soilavailable P from an unfertilized (control) Andisol (Barros Arana series: BAR) or following different poultry manure rates: 100 PM (100 mg P kg−1 soil), 200 PM (200 mg P kg−1 soil), and 300 PM (300 mg P kg−1 soil) at different sampling days (1, 3, 5, 7, and 10). Lowercase letters indicate significant differences (p < 0.05) between the treatments on the same sampling day and capital letters indicate significant differences (p < 0.05) of sampling day in the same treatment (two-way ANOVA followed by Tukey test).
Blsf 03 00062 g001
Figure 2. Acid phosphatase activity (APase) in unamended (control) Andisols (Cunco: CUN; Villarrica: VILL1 and VILL2; and Los Lagos: LLA series) or with poultry manure applied at different rates: 200 PM (200 mg P kg−1 soil) and 300 PM (300 mg P kg−1 soil) after 10 days of incubation. Lowercase letters indicate significant differences (p < 0.05) between the treatments in the same sampling day and capital letters indicate significant differences (p < 0.05) of sampling day in the same treatment (two-way ANOVA followed by Tukey test).
Figure 2. Acid phosphatase activity (APase) in unamended (control) Andisols (Cunco: CUN; Villarrica: VILL1 and VILL2; and Los Lagos: LLA series) or with poultry manure applied at different rates: 200 PM (200 mg P kg−1 soil) and 300 PM (300 mg P kg−1 soil) after 10 days of incubation. Lowercase letters indicate significant differences (p < 0.05) between the treatments in the same sampling day and capital letters indicate significant differences (p < 0.05) of sampling day in the same treatment (two-way ANOVA followed by Tukey test).
Blsf 03 00062 g002
Figure 3. Available P of the combination of poultry manure and rock phosphate at 50:50 and 70:30 rates on different sampling days (1, 10, 20, and 30). Lowercase letters indicate significant differences (p < 0.05) between the treatments in the same sampling day and capital letters indicate significant differences (p < 0.05) of sampling day in the same treatment (two-way ANOVA followed by Tukey test).
Figure 3. Available P of the combination of poultry manure and rock phosphate at 50:50 and 70:30 rates on different sampling days (1, 10, 20, and 30). Lowercase letters indicate significant differences (p < 0.05) between the treatments in the same sampling day and capital letters indicate significant differences (p < 0.05) of sampling day in the same treatment (two-way ANOVA followed by Tukey test).
Blsf 03 00062 g003
Table 1. Selected poultry manure properties.
Table 1. Selected poultry manure properties.
Dry MatterpHTotal OCTotal NTotal P
%(H2O)(g kg−1)
Poultry manure56.18.77267.837.125.0
Table 2. Selected soil physicochemical properties.
Table 2. Selected soil physicochemical properties.
SoilSoil OrderSoil FamilyBulk Density
(g cm−3)
pH
(H2O)
Available P
(mg kg−1)
Total OC
(g kg−1)
Total N
(g kg−1)
BARAndisolTypic Hapludand0.855.710.087.02.1
CUNAndisolAcrudoxic Hapludand1.056.011.032.98.2
VILL1AndisolAcrudoxic Fulvudands0.655.26.1130.37.7
VILL2AndisolAcrudoxic Fulvudands0.655.26.9130.36.6
LLAAndisolTypic Durundands0.846.12.882.75.3
Table 3. Selected properties of rock phosphate.
Table 3. Selected properties of rock phosphate.
pHAvailable PCaOMgOCaCO3
H2Og kg−1%
Rock phosphate8.7282.8301.210
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Poblete-Grant, P.; Demanet, R.; de La Luz Mora, M.; Rumpel, C. Available P Enhancement in Andisols under Pasture and Rock Phosphate Amended with Poultry Manure. Biol. Life Sci. Forum 2021, 3, 62. https://doi.org/10.3390/IECAG2021-09676

AMA Style

Poblete-Grant P, Demanet R, de La Luz Mora M, Rumpel C. Available P Enhancement in Andisols under Pasture and Rock Phosphate Amended with Poultry Manure. Biology and Life Sciences Forum. 2021; 3(1):62. https://doi.org/10.3390/IECAG2021-09676

Chicago/Turabian Style

Poblete-Grant, Patricia, Rolando Demanet, María de La Luz Mora, and Cornelia Rumpel. 2021. "Available P Enhancement in Andisols under Pasture and Rock Phosphate Amended with Poultry Manure" Biology and Life Sciences Forum 3, no. 1: 62. https://doi.org/10.3390/IECAG2021-09676

APA Style

Poblete-Grant, P., Demanet, R., de La Luz Mora, M., & Rumpel, C. (2021). Available P Enhancement in Andisols under Pasture and Rock Phosphate Amended with Poultry Manure. Biology and Life Sciences Forum, 3(1), 62. https://doi.org/10.3390/IECAG2021-09676

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop