Impact of Innovative Films Used for the Production of Silage on Biochemical and Microbial Product Qualities †
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Plant Material, Bale Preparation Method, and Tested Films
2.2. Microbiological and Biochemical Analyses
3. Results and Discussion
3.1. Addition of Nanosilver or Microcellulose to the Wrapping Film
3.2. The Use of Recycled PE for Film Preparation
4. Conclusions
Supplementary Materials
Author Contributions
Funding
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Wilkinson, J.M.; Rinne, M. Highlights of progress in silage conservation and future perspectives. Grass Forage Sci. 2018, 73, 40–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Avila, C.L.S.; Carvalho, B.F. Silage fermentation—Updates focusing on the performance of micro-organisms. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2020, 128, 966–984. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Cai, Y.; Benno, Y.; Ogawa, M.; Ohmomo, S.; Kumai, S.; Nakase, T. Influence of Lactobacillus spp. from an inoculant and of Weissella and Leuconostoc spp. from forage crops on silage fermentation. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 1998, 64, 2982–2987. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Grabowicz, M.; Kaszkowiak, J.; Dorszewski, P.; Szterk, P. Przydatność folii oksybiodegradowalnej do przechowywania kiszonek (in Polish). Logistyka 2015, 4, 1869–1876. [Google Scholar]
- Borreani, G.; Piano, S.; Tabacco, E. Aerobic stability of maize silage stored under plastic films with different oxygen permeability. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2014, 94, 2684–2690. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Micek, P. Analizy chemiczne obnażają błędy podczas kiszenia traw. Top Agrar Polska. Top Bydło 2007, 4, 10–13. (In Polish) [Google Scholar]
- Supel, P.; Kaszycki, P.; Kasperczyk, M.; Kacorzyk, P. Dynamics of microbiota changes of silage environment resulting from the use of new generation films (in Polish). Przem. Chem. 2018, 97, 1333–1339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bathelt, P. Jakość sianokiszonki w zależności od użytej folii. Master’s Thesis, University of Agriculture, Krakow, Poland, 2017. (In Polish). [Google Scholar]
- Radkowski, A.; Radkowska, I. Ocena jakości i wartości pokarmowej kiszonek z runi łąkowej wybranych gospodarstw Polski południowo-wschodniej. Wiadomości Zootechniczne 2014, 1, 32–37. (In Polish) [Google Scholar]
- Kung, L.J.; Shaver, R.D.; Grant, R.J.; Schmidt, R.J. Silage review: Interpretation of chemical, microbial and organoleptic components of silages. J. Dairy Sci. 2018, 101, 4020–4033. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Queiroz, O.C.M.; Arriola, K.G.; Daniel, J.L.P.; Adesogan, A.T. Effects of 8 chemical and bacterial additives on the quality of corn silage. J. Dairy Sci. 2013, 96, 5836–5843. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Dry Mass Changes | Total Sugar | Total Protein | Crude Fiber | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
t1 | t2 | t3 | ||||
P1 | 42.7 ± 1.6 | 42.7 ± 2.0 | 44.0 ± 1.7 | 6.4 ± 0.6 | 14.0 ± 0.6 | 29.3 ± 1.0 |
P2 | 51.5 ± 2.0 | 51.5 ± 1.6 | 44.9 ± 1.7 | 8.0 ± 0.7 | 15.0 ± 0.6 | 28.1 ± 0.9 |
P3 | 45.7 ± 1.8 | 45.7 ± 1.7 | 56.0 ± 2.1 | 11.5 ± 1.1 | 13.1 ± 0.5 | 28.6 ± 0.9 |
P4 | 49.5 ± 1.9 | 49.5 ± 1.6 | 52.2 ± 2.0 | 9.9 ± 0.9 | 13.0 ± 0.5 | 29.3 ± 1.0 |
P5 | 42.5 ± 1.6 | 42.5 ± 1.3 | 45.5 ± 1.7 | 6.6 ± 0.6 | 13.7 ± 0.6 | 29.5 ± 1.0 |
P6 | 45.5 ± 1.7 | 45.5 ± 1.7 | 47.0 ± 1.8 | 7.8 ± 0.7 | 14.2 ± 0.6 | 30.0 ± 1.0 |
P7 | 41.4 ± 1.6 | 41.4 ± 1.7 | 42.9 ± 1.6 | 6.5 ± 0.6 | 13.4 ± 0.6 | 29.4 ± 1.0 |
Dry Mass [%] | pH | Lactic Acid [% of Total Acids] | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
t1 | t2 | t1 | t2 | t1 | t2 | |
PR0 | 39.14 ± 1.50 | 42.79 ± 1.64 | 4.69 ± 0.06 | 4.85 ± 0.06 | 77 | 60 |
PR1 | 46.59 ± 1.78 | 32.32 ± 1.24 | 4.82 ± 0.06 | 4.32 ± 0.06 | 92 | 68 |
PR2 | 38.98 ± 1.49 | 41.14 ± 1.57 | 4.83 ± 0.06 | 5.01 ± 0.06 | 82 | 54 |
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Supel, P.; Kaszycki, P.; Kasperczyk, M.; Kacorzyk, P. Impact of Innovative Films Used for the Production of Silage on Biochemical and Microbial Product Qualities. Biol. Life Sci. Forum 2021, 3, 17. https://doi.org/10.3390/IECAG2021-09731
Supel P, Kaszycki P, Kasperczyk M, Kacorzyk P. Impact of Innovative Films Used for the Production of Silage on Biochemical and Microbial Product Qualities. Biology and Life Sciences Forum. 2021; 3(1):17. https://doi.org/10.3390/IECAG2021-09731
Chicago/Turabian StyleSupel, Paulina, Paweł Kaszycki, Mirosław Kasperczyk, and Piotr Kacorzyk. 2021. "Impact of Innovative Films Used for the Production of Silage on Biochemical and Microbial Product Qualities" Biology and Life Sciences Forum 3, no. 1: 17. https://doi.org/10.3390/IECAG2021-09731
APA StyleSupel, P., Kaszycki, P., Kasperczyk, M., & Kacorzyk, P. (2021). Impact of Innovative Films Used for the Production of Silage on Biochemical and Microbial Product Qualities. Biology and Life Sciences Forum, 3(1), 17. https://doi.org/10.3390/IECAG2021-09731