Next Article in Journal
The Potential Use of Synbiotic Combinations in Cereal-Based Solid Food Products—A Review
Previous Article in Journal
A Dietary Supplement Containing Plant Sterols Exerts a Positive Effect on Inflammatory Markers in a Chronic Colitis Murine Model
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Proceeding Paper

A Perspective of Applications of Wine Pomace in Flour-Containing Foods: A Mini-Review †

by
Nataliya Grevtseva
1 and
Sergey Gubsky
2,*
1
Department of International e-Commerce and Hotel and Restaurant Business, V.N. Kharkiv National University, 61022 Kharkiv, Ukraine
2
Department of Chemistry, Biochemistry, Microbiology and Hygiene of Nutrition, State Biotechnological University, 61051 Kharkiv, Ukraine
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Presented at the 4th International Electronic Conference on Foods, 15–30 October 2023; Available online: https://foods2023.sciforum.net/.
Biol. Life Sci. Forum 2023, 26(1), 61; https://doi.org/10.3390/Foods2023-15154
Published: 19 October 2023
(This article belongs to the Proceedings of The 4th International Electronic Conference on Foods)

Abstract

:
Wine pomace, also mentioned as grape pomace (GP), is a byproduct of the wine industry, containing about 50% grape skins, 25% grape seeds and 25% stems. These wastes are of great value and great potential as a source of biologically active compounds. This opens up new prospects for the rational use of GP in the food industry. It is no coincidence that numerous new technologies for processing these byproducts have recently emerged to create a wide range of diverse new food products by enriching traditional foods with antioxidants, dietary fiber and mineral compounds. The most popular GP processing products are extracts and powders. Powders do not require special storage conditions, and they are highly adaptable, mixing well with other types of food raw materials, especially loose ones. Therefore, they are widely used in such products as bread, cookies, pasta, muffins, etc. Grape powders improve the structure of the dough, slow down the oxidation of fats, for example, in cookies, and increase the nutritional value of flour products. Finally, we will discuss these perspectives on the use of grape pomace as an ingredient in the formulation of flour-containing food products.

1. Introduction

A large number of publications, including reviews, are currently devoted to the use of grape pomace in food production, for example, [1,2,3,4,5,6]. This attention is based on the special composition and properties of grape pomace. The composition of this byproduct depends on many factors—the place and conditions of growing the grape, its variety, harvesting conditions, methods of processing—but in general, the wine pomace is the source of the following compounds. The main component of wine pomace is dietary fiber. In dried pomace, the content of dietary fiber ranges from 43% to 75%. Dietary fiber is mainly composed of cell wall polysaccharides and lignin, and also contains a considerable proportion of tannins and proteins. The protein content of wine pomace may range between 6% and 15%. It has an amino acid profile similar to that of cereals. Lipids are concentrated in grape seeds; lipid content varies from 14% to 17%. The main minerals of grape pomace are potassium, calcium, phosphorus, sulfur and magnesium [1]. Their amount varies widely. The most important component of grape pomace is polyphenolic compounds. The total extractable phenolics in grapes are present at 60–70% in the seeds, and 28–35% in the skin [7]. Total polyphenol content (TPC) can vary over a wide range of 0.28–8.70 g/100 g of the sample [3]. The main ones of the polyphenolic compounds are hydroxybenzoic (gallic, ellagic, vanillic, syringic, p-hydroxybenzoic) and hydroxycinnamic (ferulic, caffeic, p-coumaric, syringic) acids; flavonols (kaempferol, myricetin, quercetin and their derivatives); flavanols (catechin, epicatechin, gallocatechin, epigallocatechin and epicatechin 3-O-gallate); anthocyanidins; tanins; proanthocyanidins; stilbenes (resveratrol tetramer and hexoside) [2]. These compounds have the potential to exert antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, antimicrobial, anticancer and antithrombotic effects, and antidepressant activity [2].
So, wine pomace has great value and great potential as a source of biologically active compounds. Numerous studies have found that, thanks to the rich chemical composition, pomace not only serves as a fortifying agent but is also capable of slowing down oxidative processes in the product and regulating its rheological properties. This makes the use of this byproduct from wine production in food technology, and specifically in the technology of flour products, promising. Grape pomace is a perishable product, so extracts or powders are prepared from it, including, separately, powder from grape seeds and powder from grape skins. A mini-review of the results of using such products from the processing of grape marc in the technology of flour products is presented below.

2. The Perspective of Applications of Wine Pomace in Formulation Foods

Earlier in [4], it was noted that the perspective of using grape pomace in food technologies is relevant, first of all, from the point of view of their use as a fairly valuable source of bioactive substances. From the point of view of practical use, the value of biologically active components lies in the three most important features, highlighted in [1]:
  • Powerful (strong) antioxidant properties due to the high content of polyphenol compounds;
  • Enriching (fortifying) properties due to the presence of minerals, dietary fiber, vitamins;
  • Antimicrobial activity due to polyphenols.
The addition of processed grape pomace products as a fortifying agent for traditional flour-containing foods allows us to solve some dietary problems associated with insufficient intake of antioxidants, dietary fiber and mineral compounds. This strategy of increasing their nutritional value is in line with the current trends in the development of food technologies for functional foods. It should be noted that this strategy is not without its drawbacks. Thus, review [1] notes both positive trends in successful fortification with improved organoleptic characteristics and technological properties of foods and negative ones in the form of side effects. These effects are associated with color changes caused by polyphenol compounds and undesirable texture changes.

3. The Applications of Grape Pomace Products in Flour-Containing Foods

These facts are confirmed by a mini-review of publications devoted to the effect of grape pomace processing products on the properties and quality indicators of flour-containing food products (Table 1). The most popular product for enrichment with grape pomace is bread. There are also technologies known for other products with grape powders, such as cereal bars, pancakes, waffles, biscuits, cookies, muffins, pasta and others. Our goal in this review was not to cover all possible publications on this topic. The task was to highlight the prospects of using grape pomace to enrich this type of food with some studies. The technological implementation of food fortification involves partial replacement of one or more main components of the traditional formulation. Typically, this ingredient is wheat flour, but in cereal bars, grape pomace was introduced instead of part of the sultanas. Usually, grape pomace is used in the form of flour or powder. Grape seeds and skin flour or powders do not require special storage conditions and have such high technological properties as good miscibility with other types of food raw materials, especially bulk ones. This feature allows them to be widely used in flour-based food.
The replacement level depends on the type of product, but is typically 5–10%. A smaller dosage does not ensure sufficient enrichment of the product, and a larger dosage often impairs the structural–mechanical and organoleptic properties of the products, in particular, leading to darkening of the color.
As can be seen from Table 1, almost all publications indicate an increase in the total content of polyphenol compounds and dietary fibers in end-products, as well as an increase in antioxidant activity. It should be noted that it is the use of grape pomace in the form of flour or powder that allows them to be used to their maximum as a source of polyphenols, including non-extractable polyphenol compounds.
Among the positive effects of including grape pomace, it is worth noting the improvement in some functional and technological properties of semi-products and the end-product:
  • Improving the rheological properties of bread dough;
  • Improvement in noodle textural characteristics such as firmness;
  • An increase in antioxidant properties for muffins and cookies, which reduced lipid oxidation during shelf life;
  • Changes in muffin texture characteristics such as firmness, chewiness, firmness, cohesion and springiness, not all of which are positive.
The data presented in Table 1 confirm the changes in sensory characteristics noted above, in particular the darker color. However, it should be noted that in general, researchers note an improvement in the organoleptic characteristics of flour products, since darkening is not a disadvantage for all of them. So, the use of grape pomace should be considered as a more effective way to utilize byproducts to enrich foods with dietary fiber and polyphenols.

4. Conclusions

This mini-review presents the successful use of grape pomace as a valuable source of important nutrients in the formulation of various flour-based food products. Particular attention is paid to polyphenols as the most important components of grape pomace. Their addition resulted in an increase in the total polyphenol content and an increase in the oxidative stability of the fortified products. On the other hand, a negative effect on textural and organoleptic characteristics was noted. In general, the data presented confirm the prospect of using grape pomace as an ingredient for creating flour-based functional products.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, S.G. and N.G.; Methodology, S.G. and N.G.; Formal analysis, S.G. and N.G.; Writing—original draft preparation, S.G. and N.G.; Writing—review and editing, S.G. and N.G. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding author.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. García-Lomillo, J.; González-SanJosé, M.L. Applications of Wine Pomace in the Food Industry: Approaches and Functions. Compr. Rev. Food Sci. Food Saf. 2017, 16, 3–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Kalli, E.; Lappa, I.; Bouchagier, P.; Tarantilis, P.A.; Skotti, E. Novel Application and Industrial Exploitation of Winery By-Products. Bioresour. Bioprocess. 2018, 5, 46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Antonić, B.; Jančíková, S.; Dordević, D.; Tremlová, B. Grape Pomace Valorization: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Foods 2020, 9, 1627. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Grevtseva, N.; Gorodyska, O.; Brykova, T.; Gubsky, S. The Use of Wine Waste as a Source of Biologically Active Substances in Confectionery Technologies. In Bioconversion of Wastes to Value-Added Products; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2023; pp. 69–111. ISBN 9781000923391. [Google Scholar]
  5. Liu, Z.; de Souza, T.S.P.; Holland, B.; Dunshea, F.; Barrow, C.; Suleria, H.A.R. Valorization of Food Waste to Produce Value-Added Products Based on Its Bioactive Compounds. Processes 2023, 11, 840. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Iuga, M.; Mironeasa, S. Potential of Grape Byproducts as Functional Ingredients in Baked Goods and Pasta. Compr. Rev. Food Sci. Food Saf. 2020, 19, 2473–2505. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Shi, J.; Yu, J.; Pohorly, J.E.; Kakuda, Y. Polyphenolics in Grape Seeds—Biochemistry and Functionality. J. Med. Food 2003, 6, 291–299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Hoye, C.; Ross, C.F. Total Phenolic Content, Consumer Acceptance, and Instrumental Analysis of Bread Made with Grape Seed Flour. J. Food Sci. 2011, 76, S428–S436. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Meral, R.; Doǧan, I.S. Grape Seed as a Functional Food Ingredient in Bread-Making. Int. J. Food Sci. Nutr. 2013, 64, 372–379. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Pečivová, P.B.; Kráčmar, S.; Kubáň, V.; Mlček, J.; Jurikova, T.; Sochor, J. Effect of Addition of Grape Seed Flour on Chemical, Textural and Sensory Properties of Bread Dough. Mitteilungen Klosterneubg. 2014, 64, 114–119. [Google Scholar]
  11. Mironeasa, S.; Codinə, G.G.; Mironeasa, C. Optimization of Wheat-Grape Seed Composite Flour to Improve Alpha-Amylase Activity and Dough Rheological Behavior. Int. J. Food Prop. 2016, 19, 859–872. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Walker, R.; Tseng, A.; Cavender, G.; Ross, A.; Zhao, Y. Physicochemical, Nutritional, and Sensory Qualities of Wine Grape Pomace Fortified Baked Goods. J. Food Sci. 2014, 79, S1811–S1822. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Mironeasa, S.; Iuga, M.; Zaharia, D.; Mironeasa, C. Optimization of White Wheat Flour Dough Rheological Properties with Different Levels of Grape Peels Flour Addition. Bulletin of University of Agricultural Sciences and Veterinary Medicine Cluj-Napoca. Food Sci. Technol. 2019, 76, 27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Baskaya-Sezer, D. The Characteristics of Microwave-Treated Insoluble and Soluble Dietary Fibers from Grape and Their Effects on Bread Quality. Food Sci. Nutr. 2023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Aksoylu, Z.; Çağindi, Ö.; Köse, E. Effects of Blueberry, Grape Seed Powder and Poppy Seed Incorporation on Physicochemical and Sensory Properties of Biscuit. J. Food Qual. 2015, 38, 164–174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Antonic, B.; Dordevic, D.; Jancikova, S.; Holeckova, D.; Tremlova, B.; Kulawik, P. Effect of Grape Seed Flour on the Antioxidant Profile, Textural and Sensory Properties Ofwaffles. Processes 2021, 9, 131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Theagarajan, R.; Malur Narayanaswamy, L.; Dutta, S.; Moses, J.A.; Chinnaswamy, A. Valorisation of Grape Pomace (Cv. Muscat) for Development of Functional Cookies. Int. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2019, 54, 1299–1305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Kuchtová, V.; Kohajdová, Z.; Karovičová, J.; Lauková, M. Physical, Textural and Sensory Properties of Cookies Incorporated with Grape Skin and Seed Preparations. Pol. J. Food Nutr. Sci. 2018, 68, 309–317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Bender, A.B.B.; Speroni, C.S.; Salvador, P.R.; Loureiro, B.B.; Lovatto, N.M.; Goulart, F.R.; Lovatto, M.T.; Miranda, M.Z.; Silva, L.P.; Penna, N.G. Grape Pomace Skins and the Effects of Its Inclusion in the Technological Properties of Muffins. J. Culin. Sci. Technol. 2017, 15, 143–157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Ortega-Heras, M.; Gómez, I.; de Pablos-Alcalde, S.; González-Sanjosé, M.L. Application of the Just-about-Right Scales in the Development of New Healthy Whole-Wheat Muffins by the Addition of a Product Obtained from White and Red Grape Pomace. Foods 2019, 8, 419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Koca, I.; Tekguler, B.; Yilmaz, V.A.; Hasbay, I.; Koca, A.F. The Use of Grape, Pomegranate and Rosehip Seed Flours in Turkish Noodle (Erişte) Production. J. Food Process. Preserv. 2018, 42, e13343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Blicharz-Kania, A.; Vasiukov, K.; Sagan, A.; Andrejko, D.; Fifowska, W.; Domin, M. Nutritional Value, Physical Properties, and Sensory Quality of Sugar-Free Cereal Bars Fortified with Grape and Apple Pomace. Appl. Sci. 2023, 13, 10531. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Table 1. Effect of incorporation of grape pomace byproducts as value-added ingredients to flour-containing foods.
Table 1. Effect of incorporation of grape pomace byproducts as value-added ingredients to flour-containing foods.
Type of FoodFortifying AgentParticle Replace Level,
%
The Main ResultRef.
Nutrition ValueFunctional and Technological PropertiesSensory Characteristics
BreadGrape seed flour2.5–10.0Increase the TPC * of the bread and doughDecrease in bread brightness and bread volume; increase in bread porosity and hardnessThe replacement of no more than 5% for TPC-fortified bread with acceptable sensory properties[8]
2.5–7.5Increase the TPCIncrease in AA ***; improved rheological propertiesChange in color[9]
2.0–10.0Increase the TPC, DFC **The highest moisture and digestibilityHigher additions of grape seed flour (8–10%) were unacceptable; the darkest color was positive[10]
3.0–7.0-The microstructure was characterized by some disruption of the gluten and starch matrix;
the best rheological properties of dough with a level of 4%
-[11]
Grape pomace powder5.0–15.0Increase the TPC, antioxidant DFCIncrease in radical scavenging activityAcceptable level of replacement with 5% or 10%[12]
Grape skin flour3.0–9.0Not studiedImprovement in rheological properties test, increasing the viscosity modulus and reducing the loss tangentPleasant, fruity–acidic and easily grape-specific smell; pleasant, a little sweet and specific to wheat flour taste with light-red grape notes; darker color[13]
Soluble and insoluble dietary fibers
obtained from grape pomace
5.0Increase the DFCClose to the control samples of bread. The best results obtained with microwave-processed dietary fibers Close to the control samples of bread[14]
BiscuitDefatted grape seed powder5.0Increase in TPC **
(Gallic acid and catechin)
Increase in AA **Decreased darker color[15]
NoodlesGrape seed flour1.0–10.0The results for the TPC and the antioxidant activity showed the highest effect with 10% grape seed flour fortificationIncrease in hardnessGood sensory properties[16]
CookiesGrape pomace (leftover skin and seeds)2.0–8.0Increase DFC, TPC and its protein contentDecrease in lipid oxidation and textural stability during storage timeSignificant change in sensory properties[17]
Grape seed and skin flour5.0–15.0Increase in DFCAddition of grape skins increases water absorption and reduces dough stability; addition of grape seeds has the opposite effectThe volume and thickness of cookies and their hardness decreased with increasing levels of grape skin and seed preparations[18]
5.0–10.0Increase in DFC, mainly in the form of soluble fibersIncrease in hardnessWithout changing the color, taste, flavor, texture[19]
MuffinGrape skin flour10.0–20.0Increase in DFCIncrease in hardness and chewiness;
decrease in springiness, cohesiveness, resilience
Good sensory acceptability;
Decrease in color parameters
[20]
Grape seed flour10.0The antioxidant activity of noodles increases by 8 times--[21]
Cereal BarsGrape pomace1.9 and 3.8 of the total mass of raw materials instead of sultanas Increase in DFCIncrease in the mechanical strength Darkening the color[22]
* TPC is acronym of total phenolic content. ** DFC is acronym of dietary fiber content and *** AA is acronym of antioxidant activity.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Grevtseva, N.; Gubsky, S. A Perspective of Applications of Wine Pomace in Flour-Containing Foods: A Mini-Review. Biol. Life Sci. Forum 2023, 26, 61. https://doi.org/10.3390/Foods2023-15154

AMA Style

Grevtseva N, Gubsky S. A Perspective of Applications of Wine Pomace in Flour-Containing Foods: A Mini-Review. Biology and Life Sciences Forum. 2023; 26(1):61. https://doi.org/10.3390/Foods2023-15154

Chicago/Turabian Style

Grevtseva, Nataliya, and Sergey Gubsky. 2023. "A Perspective of Applications of Wine Pomace in Flour-Containing Foods: A Mini-Review" Biology and Life Sciences Forum 26, no. 1: 61. https://doi.org/10.3390/Foods2023-15154

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop