Next Article in Journal
Characterization of Polyphenolic Composition of Extracts from Winery Wastes by HPLC-UV-MS/MS
Previous Article in Journal
Effects of a Plant-Based Diet with Whole Eggs or Egg Substitute on Parameters of Metabolic Syndrome, Plasma Choline, and TMAO Concentrations
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Proceeding Paper

Identifying Environmental Refuges (“Coldspots”) from Infection by Batrachochytrium Dendrobatidis of Amphibians in Eastern Europe †

1
I. I. Schmalhausen Institute of Zoology, National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, 01030 Kyiv, Ukraine
2
Department of Ecology, Institute of Life Sciences and Technologies, Daugavpils University, LV-5401 Daugavpils, Latvia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Presented at the 1st International Electronic Conference on Biological Diversity, Ecology and Evolution, 15–31 March 2021; Available online: https://bdee2021.sciforum.net/.
Biol. Life Sci. Forum 2021, 2(1), 36; https://doi.org/10.3390/BDEE2021-09505
Published: 18 March 2021

Abstract

:
Amphibians are the most threatened group of vertebrates. While habitat loss poses the greatest threat to amphibians, a spreading fungal disease caused by Batrachochytrium dendrobatidis (Bd) is seriously affecting an increasing number of species. Although Bd is widely prevalent, there are identifiable heterogeneities in the pathogen’s distribution that are linked to environmental parameters. Our objective was to identify conditions that affect the geographic distribution of this pathogen using species distribution models (SDMs), with a special focus on Eastern Europe. SDMs can help identify hotspots for future outbreaks of Bd, but perhaps more importantly, they can identify locations that may be environmental refuges (“coldspots”) from infection. In general, climate is considered a major factor in driving amphibian disease dynamics, but temperature in particular has received increased attention. Here, 42 environmental raster layers containing data on climate, soil and human impacts were used. Mean annual temperature range (or ‘continentality’) was found to have the strongest constrain on the geographic distribution of this pathogen. Using the partial dependence visualization module in the R package ‘embarcadero’, a number of corresponding coldspots were identified.

1. Introduction

Amphibians are the most threatened group of vertebrates, with a third of currently known species in danger of extinction. Although habitat loss clearly poses the greatest threat to amphibians, a newly recognized fungal disease is seriously affecting an increasing number of species [1]. This disease, caused by the chytrid fungus Batrachochytrium dendrobatidis (Bd), has been linked to the global decline of amphibian species and represents the greatest documented loss of biodiversity attributable to a pathogen [2]. Although Bd is widely prevalent, there are identifiable heterogeneities in the pathogen’s distribution that are linked to environmental parameters [3]. In this respect, species distribution models (SDMs) have proven to be useful tools for predicting Bd distribution and elucidating the importance of a wide range of environmental covariates considered to affect Bd occurrence. The first Bd SDMs to be developed were global in scope [4,5]. Using SDMs, our objective was to identify conditions that constrained the geographic distribution of this pathogen in Eastern Europe in an aim to identify hotspots for future outbreaks of Bd but, perhaps more importantly, identify locations that may be environmental refuges (“coldspots”) from infection [6]. Undoubtedly, both aspects are essential for proactive conservation planning [7].

2. Materials and Methods

Localities for Bd were gathered from GBIF (https://www.gbif.org, accessed on 17 January 2021) (https://doi.org/10.15468/dl.bhqawb, accessed on 17 November 2021) and the literature [8,9], etc. Because many uncertainties are associated with SDM projections, particularly when it comes to building an SDM for a species expanding its home range into a new area, we used only records of European localities for the analysis. In total, there were 648 such records. These were filtered out by enforcing a distance of 50 km between records; we used this filtering process because ecological niche models are sensitive to sample bias [10]. In the end, the total number of records was reduced to 116. To build models, environmental values at localities of known occurrence were determined and then used to identify geographic regions that have similar combinations of environmental values. Several types of environmental variables at a geodetic resolution of 5 arc minutes were used as a proxy for the fundamental niche [11]: (1) the Bioclim dataset (https://www.worldclim.org/bioclim, accessed on 27 December 2020); (2) several eco-attributes, such as human fragmentation, accessibility and appropriation (https://databasin.org, accessed on 27 December 2020); (3) the ENVIREM dataset (https://envirem.github.io/, accessed on 17 November 2021); and (4) the Global Soil Dataset (http://globalchange.bnu.edu.cn/research/soilw, accessed on 27 December 2020) (see also: [12]). SDMs were generated by employing Bayesian additive regression trees (BART), a powerful machine learning approach. Running SDMs with BARTs has recently been greatly facilitated by the development of an R package, ‘embarcadero’ [13], including an automated variable selection procedure that is highly effective for identifying informative subsets of predictors. Additionally, the package includes methods for generating and plotting partial dependence curves and visualization called spatial partial dependence plots, which can reclassify predictor rasters based on their partial dependence plots and show the relative suitability of different regions for an individual covariate. Habitat suitability values ranged from 0 to 1. Model performance was assessed using measures of accuracy: the area under the receiver–operator curve (AUC, [14]) and the true skills statistic (TSS, [15]).

3. Results

Both measures of accuracy showed that the SDM performed very well (AUC = 0.92 and TSS = 0.73). The automated variable selection procedure identified informative subsets of predictors, for which continentality (°C × 10), the minimum temperature of the coldest month (°C × 10), Thornthwaite’s aridity index [16,17], pH (measured in a calcium chloride solution), and human appropriation were all significant [18,19]. Temperature is considered one of the most important environmental factors driving chytridiomycosis [20], with a lower thermal limit below 4 °C [21]. Amongst the used covariates, continentality is perhaps the most distinguishable dimension of the climatic niche of Bd in the study area, featuring the seasonal amplitude at an ambient temperature. As shown in Figure 1, it is clear that large differences between low temperatures in the cold season and high temperatures in the hot season are limiting factors for the pathogen, with its habitat suitability (the ‘response’) dropping from above 0.6 in the west of the continent to below 0.3 in the east (Figure 2). An indication that low temperatures limit the spread of Bd is the increasing trend of the partial dependence curve plotted for the minimum temperature of the coldest month, showing a steep increase in habitat suitability (to over 0.5) upon approaching the 0 °C mark. Earlier bioclimatic variables associated with precipitation were found to make high contributions to SDMs considering Bd [6]. In our case, Thornthwaite’s aridity index, commonly used for measuring the aridity of an area and based on both precipitation and temperature, showed a better performance than most other bioclimatic variables, perhaps because of its compound character. The partial dependence curve built for this index clearly highlights wet, humid and marginally moist sub-humid (values between 1 and 31, or slightly over 32) climates as suitable for pathogens. Of all soil features, pH turned out to make the highest contribution to the SDM. Outbreaks of chytridiomycosis may be affected by pH, but the pH optimum (pH 6–7) for B. dendrobatidis is not different from common pH values of freshwater systems [21]. Our model indicated an optimum of around 6.5, where the suitability was the highest. Finally, human appropriation, the only human-related covariate selected for its contribution to the SDM, provided a useful measure of human intervention in the biosphere through the appropriation of net primary production. Our model explicitly points towards areas of greater human intervention as areas more likely to be suitable for Bd.

4. Discussion

Using the SDM and an arbitrarily selected threshold of 0.2, we identified locations that may be environmental refuges (“coldspots”) for amphibians from infection by Bd in Eastern Europe (Figure 3). These particular areas are close to the dividing threshold in Poland and Moldova (also shared with Romania and Ukraine), where adequate management and conservation plans for protecting amphibians have to be designed to begin with. The results of the modelling assume that large portions of Latvia, Lithuania, Ukraine, and the Kaliningrad Province of the Russian Federation will not be favorable for the pathogen; niche case of Belarus, this seems to hold for the entire country

5. Conclusions

SDMs, on the one hand, predict the geographic extent of a species, and on the other hand, they can identify the contribution of habitat covariates to explaining this distribution. When applied to Bd, we find SDMs to be useful for identifying conditions that constrain the geographic distribution of this pathogen and identify locations that may be environmental refuges from infection.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, O.N., M.P. and V.T.; Data curation, O.N., M.P., A.S., A.Č. and I.K.; Formal analysis, O.N., V.T. and O.M.; Funding acquisition, M.P., A.S. and A.Č.; Investigation, O.N., M.P., O.M., I.K. and A.Č.; Methodology, O.N. and V.T.; Project administration, A.S., O.N., A.Č. and M.P.; Resources, O.N., M.P. and A.Č.; Software, O.N. and V.T.; Supervision, O.N., V.T. and M.P.; Validation, O.N., V.T., A.Č. and M.P.; Visualization, O.N., V.T. and M.P.; Writing—original draft and Writing—review and editing, author: O.N., V.T., M.P., A.Č., O.M., A.S. and I.K. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the project “Pond aquaculture production and ecosystem service in-novative research with modeling of the climate impact to tackle horizontal challenges and improve aquaculture sustainability governance in Latvia” (lzp–2020/2–0070) financed by Fundamental and Applied Research Projects (FLPP).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are openly available in [Batrachochytrium dendrobatidis Longcore, Pessier & D.K.Nichols in GBIF Secretariat (2021) GBIF Occurrence Download at https://doi.org/10.15468/dl.bhqawb, accessed on 17 November 2021].

Acknowledgments

We thank for cooperation the project “Pond aquaculture production and ecosystem service innovative research with modelling of the climate impact to tackle horizontal challenges and improve aquaculture sustainability governance in Latvia” (lzp-2020/2-0070) financed by Fundamental and Applied Research Projects (FLPP).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Abbreviations

The following abbreviations are used in this manuscript:
SDMspecies distribution model
BARTBayesian additive regression trees
BdBatrachochytrium dendrobatidis
TSStrue skills statistic
AUCarea under the receiver operator curve

References

  1. The International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN). Conservation International; NatureServe. An Analysis of Amphibians on the 2008 IUCN Red List. 2008. Available online: www.iucnredlist.org/amphibians (accessed on 21 July 2020).
  2. Scheele, B.C.; Pasmans, F.; Berger, L.; Martel, A.; Beukema, W.; Acevedo, A.A.; Burrowes, P.A.; Carvalho, T.; Catenazzi, A.; De la Riva, I.; et al. Amphibian fungal panzootic causes catastrophic and ongoing loss of biodiversity. Science 2019, 363, 1459–1463. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Fisher, M.C.; Garner, T.W.J.; Walker, S.F. Global Emergence of Batrachochytrium dendrobatidis and Amphibian Chytridiomycosis in Space, Time, and Host. Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 2009, 63, 291–310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  4. Rödder, D.; Kielgast, J.; Bielby, J.; Schmidtlein, S.; Bosch, J.; Garner, T.W.; Veith, M.; Walker, S.; Fisher, M.C.; Lötters, S. Global amphibian extinction risk assessment for the panzootic chytrid fungus. Diversity 2009, 1, 52–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Liu, X.; Rohr, J.R.; Li, Y.M. Climate, vegetation, introduced hosts and trade shape a global wildlife pandemic. Proc. Biol. Sci. 2013, 280, 20122506. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Zumbado-Ulate, H.; García-Rodríguez, A.; Vredenburg, V.T.; Searle, C. Infection with Batrachochytrium dendrobatidis is common in tropical lowland habitats: Implications for amphibian conservation. Ecol. Evol. 2019, 9, 4917–4930. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Miller, C.A.; Tasse Taboue, G.C.; Ekane MM, P.; Robak, M.; Sesink Clee, P.R.; Richards-Zawacki, C.; Fokam, E.B.; Fuashi, N.A.; Anthony, N.M. Distribution modeling and lineage diversity of the chytrid fungus Batrachochytrium dendrobatidis (Bd) in a central African amphibian hotspot. PLoS ONE 2018, 13, e0199288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Greenberg, D.A.; Palen, W.J.; Mooers, A.Ø. Amphibian species traits, evolutionary history and environment predict Batrachochytrium dendrobatidis infection patterns, but not extinction risk. Evol Appl. 2017, 10, 1130–1145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Schatz, A.M.; Kramer, A.M.; Drake, J.M. Accuracy of climate-based forecasts of pathogen spread. R. Soc. Opensci. 2017, 4, 160975. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  10. Warren, D.L.; Seifert, S.N. Ecological niche modeling in Maxent: The importance of model complexity and the performance of model selection criteria. Ecol. Appl. 2011, 21, 335–342. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  11. Peterson, A.T.; Soberón, J.; Pearson, R.G.; Anderson, R.P.; Martinez-Meyer, E.; Nakamura, M.; Araújo, M. Ecological Niches and Geographic Distributions; Princeton University Press: Princeton, NJ, USA, 2011; p. 314. [Google Scholar]
  12. Hulleman, W.G.; Vos, R.A. Modeling Abiotic Niches of Crops and Wild Ancestors Using Deep Learning: A Generalized Approach. bioRxiv 2019, 826347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Carlson, C.J. ‘embarcadero’: Species distribution modelling with Bayesian additive regression trees in R. Methods Ecol. Evol. 2020, 11, 850–858. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Fielding, A.H.; Bell, J.F. A review of methods for the assessment of prediction errors in conservation presence/absence models. Env. Conserv. 1997, 24, 38–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Allouche, O.; Tsoar, A.; Kadmon, R. Assessing the accuracy of species distribution models: Prevalence, kappa and the true skill statistic (TSS). J. Appl. Ecol. 2006, 43, 1223–1232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Thornthwaite, C.W. The climate of North America according to a new classification. Geogr. Rev. 1931, 21, 633–655. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Thornthwaite, C.W. An approach toward a rational classification of climate. Geogr. Rev. 1948, 38, 55–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Imhoff, M.L.; Bounoua, L. Exploring Global Patterns of Net Primary Production Carbon Supply and Demand Using Satellite Observations and Statistical Data. J. Geophys. Res. 2006, 111, S12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Krausmann, F.; Erb, K.H.; Gingrich, S.; Haberl, H.; Bondeau, A.; Gaube, V.; Lauk, C.; Plutzar, C.; Searchinger, T.D. Global human appropriation of net primary production doubled in the 20th century. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2013, 110, 10324–10329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  20. Bradley, P.W.; Brawner, M.D.; Raffel, T.R.; Rohr, J.R.; Olson, D.H.; Blaustein, A.R. Shifts in temperature influence how Batrachochytrium dendrobatidis infects amphibian larvae. PLoS ONE 2019, 4, e0222237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  21. Piotrowski, J.S.; Annis, S.L.; Longcore, J.E. Physiology of Batrachochytrium dendrobatidis, a chytrid pathogen of amphibians. Mycologia 2004, 96, 9–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Partial dependence plot for ‘continentality’; blue area = 95% confidence interval.
Figure 1. Partial dependence plot for ‘continentality’; blue area = 95% confidence interval.
Blsf 02 00036 g001
Figure 2. Spatial partial dependence plot for ‘continentality’, showing the relative suitability of different regions in Europe for Batrachochytrium dendrobatidis.
Figure 2. Spatial partial dependence plot for ‘continentality’, showing the relative suitability of different regions in Europe for Batrachochytrium dendrobatidis.
Blsf 02 00036 g002
Figure 3. Map depicting contour lines (in yellow) delimiting areas in Eastern Europe where modelled habitat suitability (HS) for B. dendrobatidis is above or below the threshold of 0.2; warmer colors indicate higher habitat suitability, whereas colder the opposite; coldspots (HS < 0.2) along the major line are numbered: 1—Northern Poland (enclave); 2—NE Poland; 3—Subcarpathia; 4—Moldova; country abbreviation: BY—Belarus, LV—Latvia, LT—Lithuania, PL—Poland, UA—Ukraine.
Figure 3. Map depicting contour lines (in yellow) delimiting areas in Eastern Europe where modelled habitat suitability (HS) for B. dendrobatidis is above or below the threshold of 0.2; warmer colors indicate higher habitat suitability, whereas colder the opposite; coldspots (HS < 0.2) along the major line are numbered: 1—Northern Poland (enclave); 2—NE Poland; 3—Subcarpathia; 4—Moldova; country abbreviation: BY—Belarus, LV—Latvia, LT—Lithuania, PL—Poland, UA—Ukraine.
Blsf 02 00036 g003
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Tytar, V.; Nekrasova, O.; Pupins, M.; Skute, A.; Marushchak, O.; Čeirāns, A.; Kozynenko, I. Identifying Environmental Refuges (“Coldspots”) from Infection by Batrachochytrium Dendrobatidis of Amphibians in Eastern Europe. Biol. Life Sci. Forum 2021, 2, 36. https://doi.org/10.3390/BDEE2021-09505

AMA Style

Tytar V, Nekrasova O, Pupins M, Skute A, Marushchak O, Čeirāns A, Kozynenko I. Identifying Environmental Refuges (“Coldspots”) from Infection by Batrachochytrium Dendrobatidis of Amphibians in Eastern Europe. Biology and Life Sciences Forum. 2021; 2(1):36. https://doi.org/10.3390/BDEE2021-09505

Chicago/Turabian Style

Tytar, Volodymyr, Oksana Nekrasova, Mihails Pupins, Arturs Skute, Oleksii Marushchak, Andris Čeirāns, and Iryna Kozynenko. 2021. "Identifying Environmental Refuges (“Coldspots”) from Infection by Batrachochytrium Dendrobatidis of Amphibians in Eastern Europe" Biology and Life Sciences Forum 2, no. 1: 36. https://doi.org/10.3390/BDEE2021-09505

APA Style

Tytar, V., Nekrasova, O., Pupins, M., Skute, A., Marushchak, O., Čeirāns, A., & Kozynenko, I. (2021). Identifying Environmental Refuges (“Coldspots”) from Infection by Batrachochytrium Dendrobatidis of Amphibians in Eastern Europe. Biology and Life Sciences Forum, 2(1), 36. https://doi.org/10.3390/BDEE2021-09505

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop