Next Article in Journal
Antifungal Properties of Urtica dioca against Six Phytopathogenic Fungi
Previous Article in Journal
Essential Oils as Potential Biopesticides in the Control of the Genus Meloidogyne: A Review
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Proceeding Paper

Profiling the Variability of Eucalyptus Essential Oils with Activity against the Phylum Nematoda †

by
Ana Margarida Rodrigues
1 and
Jorge M. S. Faria
2,3,*
1
Plant Metabolomics Laboratory, Instituto de Tecnologia Química e Biológica António Xavier (ITQB NOVA), Av. da República, 2780-157 Oeiras, Portugal
2
INIAV, I.P., National Institute for Agricultural and Veterinary Research, Quinta do Marquês, 2780-159 Oeiras, Portugal
3
MED, Mediterranean Institute for Agriculture, Environment and Development, Institute for Advanced Studies and Research, Évora University, Pólo da Mitra, Ap. 94, 7006-554 Évora, Portugal
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Presented at the 1st International Electronic Conference on Biological Diversity, Ecology and Evolution, 15–31 March 2021; Available online: https://bdee2021.sciforum.net/.
Biol. Life Sci. Forum 2021, 2(1), 26; https://doi.org/10.3390/BDEE2021-09425
Published: 12 March 2021

Abstract

:
The genus Eucalyptus (Myrtaceae) comprises more than 800 species, mostly native to Australia. Eucalyptus shoots’ essential oils (EOs) are well-known for their extremely high qualitative and quantitative variation in terpenes (mainly mono- and sesquiterpenes). These EOs have a wide range of uses, from the taxonomic characterization of populations based on the chemical profiling of EO chemotypes, to industrial applications, including pharmaceutical and agrochemical and in food and fragrances. In this study, we reviewed the available information concerning the chemical variability of EOs from Eucalyptus spp. assayed against nematodes. Among the most active EOs, those from E. globulus, E. staigeriana, and E. citriodora were most frequently used. EO chemical composition was mainly dominated by 1,8-cineole, limonene, p-cymene, citronellal, and piperitone in varying proportions. Nematicidal activity of Eucalyptus EOs was reported against animal parasitic nematodes, including gastrointestinal nematodes (e.g., Haemonchus contortus), plant parasitic nematodes, such as root-knot nematodes (e.g., Meloidogyne incognita and M. chitwoodi) or the pinewood nematode Bursapelenchus xylophilus, and the free-living nematode Caenorhabditis elegans. Correlation between EO qualitative and quantitative composition with its respective activity may provide valuable information on the nematicidal specificity of EOs. This knowledge can be useful for devising environmentally safer pest management strategies in the conservation of ecosystems biodiversity.

1. Introduction

Essential oils (EOs) are volatile mixtures, exclusively obtained from plant material by hydro, steam, or dry distillation, or in the case of Citrus fruits, mechanically without heating [1]. These volatile mixtures are mainly composed of terpenes (mono-, sesqui-, and diterpenes) and phenylpropanoids and are usually dominated by one to three major components at relatively high amounts [2]. The genus Eucalyptus (Myrtaceae family) comprises more than 800 species, mostly native to Australia. Eucalyptus spp. have been extensively explored in the pharmaceutical and cosmetic industries due to their terpene-rich essential oils (EOs), namely high quantities of 1,8-cineole (also referred as Eucalyptol), an oxygenated monoterpenoid used extensively in flavorings, fragrances, and cosmetics [3]. In traditional medicine, eucalypt leaves and 1,8-cineole are generally used as cough suppressants.
Eucalyptus spp. are well-known for the high qualitative and quantitative variations in foliar terpene, at the taxa, population, and individual levels, and a large number of chemotypes have been identified [4,5,6,7,8,9]. Terpenes are a large class of secondary metabolites, with an important ecological role in mediating plant–plant and plant–animal interactions. In the Myrtaceae family, terpenes have been mostly implicated in defensive roles against herbivores and pathogens [7]. EO chemotypes are defined by qualitative and quantitative differences in the EO chemical composition among populations of the same species, due to genetic variations in the regulation of terpene biosynthesis [4,10,11]. The occurrence of EO chemotypes has been strongly associated with geographical variation and can reflect the different environmental conditions to which plants are exposed (e.g., altitude, solar exposition, or soil type) [1]. In addition, the frequent occurrence of EO chemotypes within Eucalyptus spp. could implicate differences in biological activities and should be carefully evaluated. Eucalyptus EOs have a wide range of biological activities, including anti-microbial, fungicidal, insecticidal/insect repellent, herbicidal, acaricidal, and nematicidal [12]. The phylum Nematoda (or Nemathelminthes) comprises roundworms and eelworms (parasites of plants). Nematodes are present in every ecosystem, including in freshwater, marine, and terrestrial environments, and can be parasitic (parasites of plants, insects, humans, and other animals) or non-parasitic (free-living). They are vermiform, unsegmented, and bilaterally symmetrical pseudocoelomates, with a pseudocoelom lined with mesoderm on one side and endoderm on the other side. The nematode body is protected by the cuticle, a very complex and evolutionarily plastic structure that functions as protection and is involved in body movement and maintaining shape. Nematodes have digestive, reproductive, nervous, and excretory systems but lack circulatory or respiratory systems [13].
In this study, we reviewed the available information concerning the chemical variability of EOs from Eucalyptus spp. assayed against nematodes (phylum Nematoda). Research was performed with the Web of Science search engine, in all available databases, on published works reporting the composition of EOs used against nematodes, using the topics “Eucalyptus”, “nematode”, and “essential oil”. Information on the Eucalyptus species and EO composition (≥1%) was collected when available. A total of 17 publications was retrieved reporting on the nematicidal activity of eucalypt EOs against animal parasitic nematodes, namely Haemonchus contortus; plant parasitic nematodes, namely Meloidogyne incognita, M. chitwoodi, and Bursapelenchus xylophilus; and the free-living nematode Caenorhabditis elegans [14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30]. These reports were published in journals dedicated to parasitology (60%), veterinary sciences (47%) and agronomy (20%). Publications dated from 2006 to 2021, with 2011, 2013, and 2015 being the years with the most publications. The listed publications were cited 350 times, with an average of 23.3 citations per work. The citing reports were published in journals specialized in Parasitology (22%), Veterinary Sciences (16%), Food Science Technology (11%), and Plant Sciences (11%).

2. Chemical Variability of Eucalyptus Essential Oils

Chemical composition was reported for a total of 32 EOs tested against plant parasitic (21), animal parasitic (10), and free-living nematodes (1). E. citriodora, E. globulus and E. staigeriana were the most studied Eucalyptus species, with seven, three, and five EOs tested, respectively. Cluster analysis was performed to determine the similarity between the composition of the tested EOs. Three main clusters were obtained (Figure 1a). EOs from E. citriodora were grouped in one single cluster, revealing a high similarity, and low variability, between EO composition. E. citriodora EO main components were citronellal and isopulegol. EOs from E. globulus were grouped together with EOs from E. saligna, E. camaldulensis, E. botryoides, E. viminalis, E. polyanthemos, E. bosistoana, E. cordieri, E. cinerea, E. smithii, and two unidentified Eucalyptus species. EOs from E. globulus revealed an extremely high degree of similarity with E. smithii, E. bosistoana, E. cordieri and E. cinerea. All Eucalyptus spp. included in this cluster were rich in 1,8-cineole and α-pinene. The remaining cluster comprised the EOs from E. staigeriana and E. urophylla, E. dives, E. melliodora, E. ficifolia, and E. pauciflora. The composition of the EO from these species showed high variability. E. ficiflora and E. pauciflora EOs were rich in α-pinene and limonene (only for E. ficiflora); E. melliodora EO contained mainly p-cymene, 1,8-cineole, and cryptone; E. urophylla EO contained mainly α-phellandrene and 1,8-cineole; E. dives EO contained piperitone, α-phellandrene, and p-cymene; and E. staigeriana showed a high variability in EO composition, with three EOs rich in limonene and the remaining two EO rich in geranial, geraniol and methyl geranate.

3. Chemical Composition of Active EOs

A total of 18 EOs were reported with a high activity against nematodes. Cluster analysis revealed three major clusters, with E. citriodora EOs included in one single cluster, E. globulus and one unidentified Eucalyptus sp. grouped together in another cluster, and E. staigeriana clustered together with E. dives and one unidentified Eucalyptus sp. (Figure 1b). No correlation could be established between EO clustering and activity against specific nematode groups. Despite the small number of reported nematicidal chemically characterized EOs, some preliminary considerations could be made regarding activity against the groups of nematodes analyzed. Only one EO was tested against free-living nematodes; thus no substantial comparison can be made with the remaining nematode types. The oxygenated monoterpene 1,8-cineole could be found in EOs active against all nematode types, in amounts ≥20% (Table 1, Figure 2). The hydrocarbon monoterpene p-cymene was found in amounts ≥20% in EOs active against plant parasitic nematodes, while the hydrocarbon monoterpene limonene was only found in amounts ≥20% in EOs active against animal parasitic nematodes.
The monoterpenic aldehyde citronellal was found in amounts ≥20% in EOs active against plant and animal parasitic nematodes, while the ketone piperitone was only found in amounts ≥20% in EOs active against plant parasitic nematodes (Table 1, Figure 2).

4. Conclusions

Chemical variability is an important trait of Eucalyptus EOs. In this study, EO composition from Eucalyptus spp. assayed against nematodes was reviewed. Cluster analysis grouped EOs from E. citriodora and E. globulus in two clusters based on the EO main components, namely citronellal and 1,8-cineole, respectively. E. staigeriana EO showed high variability in the EO main components, namely limonene, geranial, geraniol, and methyl geranate. Concerning nematicidal EOs, p-cymene and 1,8-cineole were ubiquitously present, yet high proportions of limonene and piperitone were exclusive to EOs tested against animal or plant parasitic nematodes, respectively. Citronellal showed high relative amounts in EOs tested against both animal and plant parasitic nematodes. Although supported by very few data, some chemical trends seem to indicate that specificity may occur for nematicidal EOs. A greater number of studies is necessary to understand how Eucalyptus EO chemical variability can influence nematicidal activity. This knowledge can be very valuable for the establishment of precision biocides with neutral environmental impacts.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, A.M.R. and J.M.S.F.; methodology, A.M.R. and J.M.S.F.; software, A.M.R. and J.M.S.F.; investigation, A.M.R. and J.M.S.F.; resources, A.M.R. and J.M.S.F.; writing—original draft preparation, A.M.R. and J.M.S.F.; writing—review and editing, A.M.R. and J.M.S.F. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The raw data supporting the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author (Jorge M. S. Faria) upon reasonable request.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Figueiredo, A.C.; Barroso, J.G.; Pedro, L.G.; Scheffer, J.J.C. Factors affecting secondary metabolite production in plants: Volatile components and essential oils. Flavour Fragr. J. 2008, 23, 213–226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Bakkali, F.; Averbeck, S.; Averbeck, D.; Idaomar, M. Biological effects of essential oils—A review. Food Chem. Toxicol. 2008, 46, 446–475. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Pino, J.A.; Marbot, R.; Quert, R.; García, H. Study of essential oils of Eucalyptus resinifera Smith, E. tereticornis Smith and Corymbia maculata (Hook.) K. D. Hill & L. A. S. Johnson, grown in Cuba. Flavour Fragr. J. 2002, 17, 1–4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Keszei, A.; Brubaker, C.L.; Foley, W.J. A molecular perspective on terpene variation in Australian Myrtaceae. Aust. J. Bot. 2008, 56, 197–213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Keszei, A.; Brubaker, C.L.; Carter, R.; Köllner, T.; Degenhardt, J.; Foley, W.J. Functional and evolutionary relationships between terpene synthases from Australian Myrtaceae. Phytochemistry 2010, 71, 844–852. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Andrew, R.L.; Keszei, A.; Foley, W.J. Intensive sampling identifies previously unknown chemotypes, population divergence and biosynthetic connections among terpenoids in Eucalyptus tricarpa. Phytochemistry 2013, 94, 148–158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Padovan, A.; Keszei, A.; Külheim, C.; Foley, W.J. The evolution of foliar terpene diversity in Myrtaceae. Phytochem. Rev. 2014, 13, 695–716. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Bustos-Segura, C.; Dillon, S.; Keszei, A.; Foley, W.J.; Külheim, C. Intraspecific diversity of terpenes of Eucalyptus camaldulensis (Myrtaceae) at a continental scale. Aust. J. Bot. 2017, 65, 257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Faria, J.M.S.; Lima, A.S.; Mendes, M.D.; Leiria, R.; Geraldes, D.A.; Figueiredo, A.C.; Trindade, H.; Pedro, L.G.; Barroso, J.G.; Sanches, J. Eucalyptus from Mata Experimental do Escaroupim (Portugal): Evaluation of the essential oil composition from sixteen species. Acta Hortic. 2011, 925, 61–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Figueiredo, A.C. Biological properties of essential oils and volatiles: Sources of variability. Nat. Volatiles Essent. Oils 2017, 4, 1–13. [Google Scholar]
  11. Rodrigues, A.M.; Mendes, M.D.; Lima, A.S.; Barbosa, P.M.; Ascensão, L.; Barroso, J.G.; Pedro, L.G.; Mota, M.M.; Figueiredo, A.C. Pinus halepensis, Pinus pinaster, Pinus pinea and Pinus sylvestris essential oils chemotypes and monoterpene hydrocarbon enantiomers, before and after inoculation with the pinewood nematode Bursaphelenchus xylophilus. Chem. Biodivers. 2017, 14, e1600153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Batish, D.R.; Singh, H.P.; Kohli, R.K.; Kaur, S. Eucalyptus essential oil as a natural pesticide. For. Ecol. Manag. 2008, 256, 2166–2174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Basyoni, M.M.A.; Rizk, E.M.A. Nematodes ultrastructure: Complex systems and processes. J. Parasit. Dis. 2016, 40, 1130–1140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  14. Ibrahim, S.K.; Traboulsi, A.F.; El-Haj, S. Effect of essential oils and plant extracts on hatching, migration and mortality of Meloidogyne incognita. Phytopathol. Mediterr. 2006, 45, 238–246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Macedo, I.T.F.; Bevilaqua, C.M.L.; de Oliveira, L.M.B.; CamurÇa-Vasconcelos, A.L.F.; Vieira, L.D.S.; Oliveira, F.R.; Queiroz-Junior, E.M.; Portela, B.G.; Barros, R.S.; Chagas, A.C.S. Atividade ovicida e larvicida in vitro do óleo essencial de Eucalyptus globulus sobre Haemonchus contortus. Rev. Bras. Parasitol. Vet. 2009, 18, 62–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Macedo, I.T.F.; Bevilaqua, C.M.L.; de Oliveira, L.M.B.; Camurça-Vasconcelos, A.L.F.; Vieira, L.D.S.; Oliveira, F.R.; Queiroz-Junior, E.M.; Tomé, A.D.R.; Nascimento, N.R.F. Anthelmintic effect of Eucalyptus staigeriana essential oil against goat gastrointestinal nematodes. Vet. Parasitol. 2010, 173, 93–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Macedo, I.T.F.; Bevilaqua, C.M.L.; de Oliveira, L.M.B.; Camurça-Vasconcelos, A.L.F.; Vieira, L.D.S.; Amóra, S.D.S.A. Evaluation of Eucalyptus citriodora essential oil on goat gastrointestinal nematodes. Rev. Bras. Parasitol. Vet. 2011, 20, 223–227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  18. Ntalli, N.G.; Ferrari, F.; Giannakou, I.; Menkissoglu-Spiroudi, U. Phytochemistry and nematicidal activity of the essential oils from 8 greek lamiaceae aromatic plants and 13 terpene components. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2010, 58, 7856–7863. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Mesquita, M.D.A.; Júnior, J.B.E.S.; Panassol, A.M.; de Oliveira, E.F.; Vasconcelos, A.L.C.F.; de Paula, H.C.B.; Bevilaqua, C.M.L. Anthelmintic activity of Eucalyptus staigeriana encapsulated oil on sheep gastrointestinal nematodes. Parasitol. Res. 2013, 112, 3161–3165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Ribeiro, W.L.C.; Macedo, I.T.F.; dos Santos, J.M.L.; de Oliveira, E.F.; Camurça-Vasconcelos, A.L.F.; de Paula, H.C.B.; Bevilaqua, C.M.L. Activity of chitosan-encapsulated Eucalyptus staigeriana essential oil on Haemonchus contortus. Exp. Parasitol. 2013, 135, 24–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  21. Ribeiro, J.C.; Ribeiro, W.L.C.; Camurça-Vasconcelos, A.L.F.; Macedo, I.T.F.; Santos, J.M.L.; Paula, H.C.B.; Araújo Filho, J.V.; Magalhães, R.D.; Bevilaqua, C.M.L. Efficacy of free and nanoencapsulated Eucalyptus citriodora essential oils on sheep gastrointestinal nematodes and toxicity for mice. Vet. Parasitol. 2014, 204, 243–248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  22. Laquale, S.; Candido, V.; Avato, P.; Argentieri, M.P.; D’Addabbo, T. Essential oils as soil biofumigants for the control of the root-knot nematode Meloidogyne incognita on tomato. Ann. Appl. Biol. 2015, 167, 217–224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Ribeiro, W.L.C.; Camurça-Vasconcelos, A.L.F.; Macedo, I.T.F.; dos Santos, J.M.L.; de Araújo-Filho, J.V.; Ribeiro, J.D.C.; Pereira, V.D.A.; Viana, D.D.A.; de Paula, H.C.B.; Bevilaqua, C.M.L. In vitro effects of Eucalyptus staigeriana nanoemulsion on Haemonchus contortus and toxicity in rodents. Vet. Parasitol. 2015, 212, 444–447. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Ribeiro, W.L.C.; Camurça-Vasconcelos, A.L.F.; dos Santos, J.M.L.; Macedo, I.T.F.; Ribeiro, J.D.C.; de Oliveira, E.F.; de Paula, H.C.B.; Bevilaqua, C.M.L. The use of Eucalyptus staigeriana nanoemulsion for control of sheep haemonchosis. Pesqui. Vet. Bras. 2017, 37, 221–226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  25. De Araújo-Filho, J.V.; Ribeiro, W.L.C.; André, W.P.P.; Cavalcante, G.S.; Guerra, M.D.C.M.; Muniz, C.R.; Macedo, I.T.F.; Rondon, F.C.M.; Bevilaqua, C.M.L.; de Oliveira, L.M.B. Effects of Eucalyptus citriodora essential oil and its major component, citronellal, on Haemonchus contortus isolates susceptible and resistant to synthetic anthelmintics. Ind. Crops Prod. 2018, 124, 294–299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. De Araújo-Filho, J.V.; Ribeiro, W.L.C.; André, W.P.P.; Cavalcante, G.S.; Rios, T.T.; Schwinden, G.M.; da Rocha, L.O.; Macedo, I.T.F.; de Morais, S.M.; Bevilaqua, C.M.L.; et al. Anthelmintic activity of Eucalyptus citriodora essential oil and its major component, citronellal, on sheep gastrointestinal nematodes. Rev. Bras. Parasitol. Vet. 2019, 28, 644–651. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Kundu, A.; Dutta, A.; Mandal, A.; Negi, L.; Malik, M.; Puramchatwad, R.; Antil, J.; Singh, A.; Rao, U.; Saha, S.; et al. A Comprehensive in vitro and in silico Analysis of Nematicidal Action of Essential Oils. Front. Plant Sci. 2021, 11, 1–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Lanzerstorfer, P.; Sandner, G.; Pitsch, J.; Mascher, B.; Aumiller, T.; Weghuber, J. Acute, reproductive, and developmental toxicity of essential oils assessed with alternative in vitro and in vivo systems. Arch. Toxicol. 2021, 95, 673–691. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Faria, J.M.S.; Barbosa, P.; Bennett, R.N.; Mota, M.; Figueiredo, A.C. Bioactivity against Bursaphelenchus xylophilus: Nematotoxics from essential oils, essential oils fractions and decoction waters. Phytochemistry 2013, 94, 220–228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Faria, J.M.S.; Sena, I.; Ribeiro, B.; Rodrigues, A.M.; Maleita, C.M.N.; Abrantes, I.; Bennett, R.; Mota, M.; Figueiredo, A.C.D.S. First report on Meloidogyne chitwoodi hatching inhibition activity of essential oils and essential oils fractions. J. Pest Sci. 2016, 89, 207–217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Dendrogram obtained by cluster analysis of the percentage composition (≥1%) of Eucalyptus essential oils reported (a) and of those with activity against nematodes (b), based on distance and using unweighted pair-group method with arithmetic average (UPGMA) method. A—animal parasitic nematodes, P—plant parasitic nematodes and F—free-living nematodes.
Figure 1. Dendrogram obtained by cluster analysis of the percentage composition (≥1%) of Eucalyptus essential oils reported (a) and of those with activity against nematodes (b), based on distance and using unweighted pair-group method with arithmetic average (UPGMA) method. A—animal parasitic nematodes, P—plant parasitic nematodes and F—free-living nematodes.
Blsf 02 00026 g001
Figure 2. Chemical structures of the main compounds found on nematicidal Eucalyptus essential oils.
Figure 2. Chemical structures of the main compounds found on nematicidal Eucalyptus essential oils.
Blsf 02 00026 g002
Table 1. Minimum and maximum percentages of main components (≥20%) of Eucalyptus EOs with activity against plant-parasitic nematodes, animal-parasitic nematodes, and free-living nematodes.
Table 1. Minimum and maximum percentages of main components (≥20%) of Eucalyptus EOs with activity against plant-parasitic nematodes, animal-parasitic nematodes, and free-living nematodes.
EO Components (%)Plant Parasitic NematodesAnimal Parasitic NematodesFree Living Nematodes
p-Cymene3.1–25.02.63.8
1,8-Cineole1.3–91.51.7–83.982.6
Limonene-7.0–72.97.7
Citronellal35.8–83.85.5–71.8-
Piperitone40.2--
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Rodrigues, A.M.; Faria, J.M.S. Profiling the Variability of Eucalyptus Essential Oils with Activity against the Phylum Nematoda. Biol. Life Sci. Forum 2021, 2, 26. https://doi.org/10.3390/BDEE2021-09425

AMA Style

Rodrigues AM, Faria JMS. Profiling the Variability of Eucalyptus Essential Oils with Activity against the Phylum Nematoda. Biology and Life Sciences Forum. 2021; 2(1):26. https://doi.org/10.3390/BDEE2021-09425

Chicago/Turabian Style

Rodrigues, Ana Margarida, and Jorge M. S. Faria. 2021. "Profiling the Variability of Eucalyptus Essential Oils with Activity against the Phylum Nematoda" Biology and Life Sciences Forum 2, no. 1: 26. https://doi.org/10.3390/BDEE2021-09425

APA Style

Rodrigues, A. M., & Faria, J. M. S. (2021). Profiling the Variability of Eucalyptus Essential Oils with Activity against the Phylum Nematoda. Biology and Life Sciences Forum, 2(1), 26. https://doi.org/10.3390/BDEE2021-09425

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop