Next Article in Journal
Association between Children’s Eating Habits and the Level of Knowledge of Nutrition of Guardians
Previous Article in Journal
Preface of IV Conference Ia ValSe-Food CYTED and VII Symposium Chia-Link
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Editorial

Statement of Peer Review

by
Norma Sammán
1,
Mabel Cristina Tomás
2,
Loreto Muñoz
3 and
Claudia Monika Haros
4,*
1
Centro Interdisciplinario de Investigaciones en Tecnologías y Desarrollo Social para el NOA (CIITED), Facultad de Ingeniería, Universidad Nacional de Jujuy, Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (CONICET), San Salvador de Jujuy 4600, Argentina
2
Centro de Investigación y Desarrollo en Criotecnología de Alimentos (CIDCA), CCT La Plata (CONICET), CICPBA, Facultad de Ciencias Exactas (FCE), Universidad Nacional de La Plata (UNLP), La Plata 1900, Argentina
3
Food Science Lab, School of Engineering, Universidad Central de Chile, Santiago 8330601, Chile
4
Institute of Agrochemistry and Food Technology (IATA), Spanish Council for Scientific Research (CSIC), 46980 Valencia, Spain
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Biol. Life Sci. Forum 2022, 17(1), 26; https://doi.org/10.3390/blsf2022017026
Published: 20 December 2022
(This article belongs to the Proceedings of IV Conference Ia ValSe-Food CYTED and VII Symposium Chia-Link)
In submitting conference proceedings to Biology and Life Sciences Forum, the volume editors of the proceedings certify that all papers published in this volume have been subjected to peer review administered by the volume editors relative to the publisher. Reviews were conducted by expert referees and held to the professional and scientific standards expected of a proceedings journal:
  • Type of peer review: single-blind; double-blind; triple-blind; open; other (please describe): single-blind;
  • Conference submission management system: we do not have any system;
  • Number of submissions sent for review: all of them (26);
  • Number of submissions accepted: all of them (26);
  • Acceptance rate (number of submissions accepted/number of submissions received): all accepted (26/26);
  • Average number of reviews per paper: three or four (3 or 4);
  • Total number of reviewers involved: four (4);
  • Any additional information on the review process: no additional comments.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Sammán, N.; Tomás, M.C.; Muñoz, L.; Haros, C.M. Statement of Peer Review. Biol. Life Sci. Forum 2022, 17, 26. https://doi.org/10.3390/blsf2022017026

AMA Style

Sammán N, Tomás MC, Muñoz L, Haros CM. Statement of Peer Review. Biology and Life Sciences Forum. 2022; 17(1):26. https://doi.org/10.3390/blsf2022017026

Chicago/Turabian Style

Sammán, Norma, Mabel Cristina Tomás, Loreto Muñoz, and Claudia Monika Haros. 2022. "Statement of Peer Review" Biology and Life Sciences Forum 17, no. 1: 26. https://doi.org/10.3390/blsf2022017026

APA Style

Sammán, N., Tomás, M. C., Muñoz, L., & Haros, C. M. (2022). Statement of Peer Review. Biology and Life Sciences Forum, 17(1), 26. https://doi.org/10.3390/blsf2022017026

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop