Next Article in Journal
Fruits and Vegetables as Sources of Carotenoids in Complementary Feeding
Previous Article in Journal
Proteomic and Genetic Approach for Lunasin Peptide and Gene Presence Detection in Various Plants
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Proceeding Paper

Metabolites Differentiating Asymptomatic and Symptomatic Grapevine Plants (Vitis vinifera ‘Malvasia-Fina’) Infected with Esca Complex Disease-Associated Fungi †

1
Centre for the Research and Technology of Agro-Environment and Biological Sciences, Departamento de Agronomia, Universidade de Trás-os-Montes e Alto Douro, Quinta de Prados, 5000-801 Vila Real, Portugal
2
InnovPlantProtect Collaborative Laboratory, Department of Protection of Specific Crops, Estrada de Gil Vaz, Apartado 72, 7350-999 Elvas, Portugal
3
Centre of Molecular and Environmental Biology, Department of Biology, Campus of Gualtar, University of Minho, 4710-057 Braga, Portugal
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Presented at the 2nd International Electronic Conference on Plant Sciences—10th Anniversary of Journal Plants, 1–15 December 2021; Available online: https://iecps2021.sciforum.net/.
Biol. Life Sci. Forum 2022, 11(1), 87; https://doi.org/10.3390/IECPS2021-11923
Published: 29 November 2021

Abstract

:
Pathogens are known to affect major physiological processes in plants including the regulation of metabolic networks to maintain homeostasis. Metabolomic analyses generate large datasets that could be analyzed to give insight into the specific metabolic adaptations involved in plant responses to grapevine trunk diseases such as esca complex. The goals of this study were to identify metabolites differentiating asymptomatic and symptomatic grapevine plants infected with esca complex disease-associated fungi, and biosynthetic pathways active during disease progression. Experiments were performed using healthy, asymptomatic and symptomatic leaves of Vitis vinifera L. ‘Malvasia-fina’ naturally infected in the vineyard. A global metabolite profile of the samples was obtained using a UPLC + GC-MS/MS2 analytical platform. A total of 513 metabolites belonging to 60 pathways were detected. The analysis of the data allowed the elucidation of some of the mechanisms by which grapevine tolerate the presence of pathogens, and the selection of top metabolites worthy of further investigation.

1. Introduction

Grapevine trunk diseases, a major biotic stress for plants, have been studied intensively for the process of pathogen infection [1]. A major characteristic of grapevine trunk diseases is the involvement of not one, but several pathogenic species in the etiology of the disease. Esca complex for example is caused by several fungi belonging to the phylum Ascomycota, and to a lesser extent to the phylum Basidiomycota (e.g., Fomitiporia mediterranea) [2,3]. Colonization by esca-associated fungi is restricted to the canes, spurs, cordons, and trunks [4]. The perception of these pathogens by the grapevine plant is known to trigger various defense responses e.g., the deployment of anatomical [5], physiological [6,7], and biochemical [8,9,10] features in order to limit fungal wood invasion and the translocation of fungal toxic metabolites to the leaves. The disease usually exhibits a latent period between wood invasion by fungi and visible foliar symptoms [7,11]. The transition from the asymptomatic state (absence of foliar symptoms) to the symptomatic state is believed to be influenced by biotic, abiotic, and genetic factors [3,6].
According to the literature, photosynthesis and respiration are among the first processes to be impacted upon infection by esca-related pathogens [9,12]. A perturbation of photosynthesis and respiration processes in grapevine plants is often accompanied by metabolic changes such as up/downregulation of genes that encode enzymes involved in detoxification processes [8,13], modulation of the expressions of antioxidant proteins [10,14], and accumulation of metabolites with different roles in defense [4,11]. Depending on the infection stage, however, distinct metabolic changes have been observed in the tissues of grapevine plants affected by esca complex. In the study by Valtaud et al. [8], the ratio of glutathione disulfide to the total glutathione pool was slightly decreased in asymptomatic leaves compared to healthy leaves but increased with the appearance of visible damage. An alteration of the photosynthetic apparatus could be detected two months before the appearance of foliar symptoms [12], which demonstrated that the disease’s causative agents induce pronounced systemic effects in the leaves.
These results show that a perturbation of the central and secondary metabolisms is provoked by the presence of woody fungal pathogens. Despite over 20 years of investigation, however, the precise adaptative mechanisms developed by the grapevine in response to esca complex have not been unraveled. This research gap in the field might be due to the scarcity of studies on plant responses at the transcriptomic, proteomic, and metabolomic levels. Recent untargeted OMIC studies have shown the possibility of identifying specific pathways directly involved in the etiopathogenesis of the disease [12,13,14,15,16]. A global OMIC analysis of grapevine could be a crucial step in efforts to appreciate the mechanisms leading to wood vascular invasion, symptom emergence, and plant tolerance. Thus, the goal of this study was to use a global metabolomic analysis of leaves to (i) identify metabolites differentiating asymptomatic and symptomatic grapevine plants affected by esca complex disease, and (ii) gain an insight into the modulation of biosynthetic pathways with disease evolution.

2. Materials and Methods

The “Quinta de Nossa Senhora de Lourdes” vineyard (465 m, 41°17.12′31″ N, 7°44.07′22″ W) in Vila Real (Portugal) was used to develop the protocol for sampling. Experiments were performed on Vitis vinifera L. ‘Malvasia-fina’ [17]. Field monitoring for six consecutive years allowed for the identification of healthy, asymptomatic, and symptomatic (two levels of severity) plants as shown in Figure 1. Six plants were selected for each group of plants and an average of 10 leaves were collected from each plant.
Metabolites were extracted from lyophilized and pulverized leaf samples with methanol using an automated MicroLab STAR® system (Hamilton Robotics, Reno, NV, USA). A global metabolic profiling of the samples was obtained with an Ultrahigh Performance Liquid Chromatography + Gas Chromatography-Tandem Mass Spectroscopy (UPLC + GC-MS/MS2) platform. The analytical platform incorporated four separate UHPLC-MS/MS2 injections and one GC-MS/MS2; the UPLC injections were optimized for hydrophilic, hydrophobic, basic, and polar compounds and the GC injection for free fatty acids. The method integrated both relative quantification (full scan MS) and qualitative capabilities (MS/MS) into each analysis without the need for additional data acquisition, as fully described by Goufo et al. [17]. After chromatographic separations and mass spectrometry analyses, raw data were extracted as area-under-the-curve detector ion counts and scaled imputed data were calculated. The identification of metabolites was based on three criteria: retention index within a narrow retention index window of the proposed identification, +/−10 ppm accurate mass match to a library of ca. 10,000 MS/MS spectra of standard compounds, and the MS/MS forward and reverse scores.
Statistical comparisons contrasted leaves from each of the infected plants to those of the control uninfected plants. Following log transformation, samples were subjected to Random Forest analysis [18] in order to identify metabolites that differed significantly among experimental groups and to provide an “importance” rank ordering of these metabolites. A random subset of the data with identifying true class information was selected to build a decision tree; the remaining data were passed down the tree to obtain a class prediction for each sample. The process was repeated thousands of times to produce the forest. The final classification of each sample was determined by computing the class prediction frequency for the remaining data variables over the whole forest. To determine which metabolite made the largest contribution to the classification, the “Mean Decrease Accuracy” (MDA) was computed and a confusion matrix was plotted to express the accuracy of the classifier’s predictions.

3. Results and Discussion

In total, 513 metabolites were identified in the leaves of the grapevine, including 436 compounds of known identity and 77 compounds of unknown structural identity, belonging to nine biochemical families (amino acids, carbohydrates, lipids, cofactors + prosthetic groups + electron carriers, nucleotides, peptides, hormones, secondary metabolites, and xenobiotics) (Figure 2).
The metabolites were assigned to 60 pathways for better visualization of significantly altered biochemicals and for targeting the pathways of interest (Figure 3). Although a Principal Component Analysis plot showed clear separation from the control only for symptomatic leaves (data not shown), several metabolites achieved statistical differences in the t-test between healthy and asymptomatic samples (p ≤ 0.10). Several metabolites showed interesting changed patterns related to the modulation of grapevine metabolism. Hormone data, for example, showed that systemic signals are transferred from the infected wood to the leaves [16]. Secondary metabolites data indicated that defense compounds are mostly locally induced following the onset of foliar symptoms [11].
Random Forest analysis (Figure 4) could classify the samples with 96% accuracy, which allowed for the selection of 30 metabolites as potentially differentiating asymptomatic and symptomatic grapevine plants infected with esca complex disease-associated fungi. Most of these metabolites were amino acids or belonged to secondary metabolism. The levels of several aromatic amino acids such as phenylalanine fell during foliar symptom emergence and the decreases were amplified with symptom progression. This indicated a shift in C partitioning away from the shikimate pathway [19] to other pathways such as the phenylpropanoid pathway. In fact, an abundance of flavonoids with various roles in defense [20] was observed in diseased leaves compared with healthy leaves.
Overall, the data show that there are different adaptation strategies developed by the grapevine plant in response to esca attack. A deeper analysis of these data should permit the identification of the pathways active during stress, which could help to establish the structural features essential for selecting or breeding tolerant plants.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, I.C. and P.G.; methodology, I.C., R.K.S., and P.G.; software, P.G.; validation, I.C. and P.G.; formal analysis, P.G.; investigation, P.G. and R.K.S.; resources, I.C.; data curation, P.G.; writing—original draft preparation, P.G.; writing—review and editing, I.C., R.K.S., and P.G.; visualization, I.C. and P.G.; supervision, I.C.; project administration, I.C.; funding acquisition, I.C. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the R&D project “INNOVINE & WINE—Vineyard and Wine Innovation Platform (NORTE-01-0145-FEDER-000038)”, co-supported by Fundo Europeu de Desenvolvimento Regional (FEDER) and Norte 2020 (Programa Operacional Regional do Norte 2014/2020), and the project UIDB/04033/2020 supported by FCT–Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are openly available in the Mendeley Data repository at https://doi.org/10.17632/4k49sk6s2w.3, and at https://doi.org/10.17632/r22wypf38w.1.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript, or in the decision to publish the results.

References

  1. Nerva, L.; Turina, M.; Zanzotto, A.; Gardiman, M.; Gaiotti, F.; Gambino, G.; Chitarra, W. Isolation, molecular characterization and virome analysis of culturable wood fungal endophytes in esca symptomatic and asymptomatic grapevine plants. Environ. Microbiol. 2019, 21, 2886–2904. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Sofia, J.; Mota, M.; Gonçalves, T.M.; Rego, C. Response of four Portuguese grapevine cultivars to infection by Phaeomoniella chlamydospora. Phytopathol. Mediterr. 2018, 57, 506–518. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Del Frari, G.; Gobbi, A.; Aggerbeck, M.R.; Oliveira, H.; Hansen, L.H.; Ferreira, R.B. Characterization of the wood mycobiome of Vitis vinifera in a vineyard affected by esca. Spatial distribution of fungal communities and their putative relation with leaf symptoms. Front. Plant Sci. 2019, 10, 910. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  4. Rusjan, D.; Persic, M.; Likar, M.; Biniari, K.; Mikulic-Petkovsek, M. Phenolic responses to esca-associated fungi in differently decayed grapevine woods from different trunk parts of ‘Cabernet Sauvignon’. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2017, 65, 6615–6624. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Ouadi, L.; Bruez, E.; Bastien, S.; Yacoub, A.; Coppin, C.; Guérin-Dubrana, L.; Fontaine, F.; Domec, J.-C.; Rey, P. Sap flow disruption in grapevine is the early signal predicting the structural, functional, and genetic responses to esca disease. Front. Plant Sci. 2021, 12, 695846. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Cholet, C.; Bruez, E.; Lecomte, P.; Barsacq, A.; Martignon, T.; Giudici, M.; Simonit, M.; Rey, P.; Dubourdieu, D.; Gény, L. Plant resilience and physiological modifications induced by curettage of Esca-diseased grapevines. OENO One 2021, 55, 153–169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Bruno, G.L.; Ippolito, M.P.; Mannerucci, F.; Bragazzi, L.; Tommasi, F. Physiological responses of ‘Italia’ grapevines infected with Esca pathogens. Phytopathol. Mediterr. 2021, 60, 321–336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Valtaud, C.; Thibault, F.; Larignon, P.; Bertsch, C.; Fleurat-lessard, P.; Bourbouloux, A. Systemic damage in leaf metabolism caused by esca infection in grapevines. Aus. J. Grape Wine Res. 2011, 17, 101–110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Martín, L.; Fontaine, F.; Castañoa, J.F.; Songy, A.; Roda, R.; Vallet, J.; Ferrer-Gallego, R. Specific profile of Tempranillo grapevines related to Esca-leaf symptoms and climate conditions. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2019, 135, 575–587. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Pasquier, G.; Lapaillerie, D.; Vilain, S.; Dupuy, J.-W.; Lomenech, A.-M.; Claverol, S.; Gény, L.; Bonneu, M.; Teissedre, P.-L.; Donèche, B. Impact of foliar symptoms of “Esca proper” on proteins related to defense and oxidative stress of grape skins during ripening. Proteomics 2013, 13, 108–118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Goufo, P.; Marques, C.A.; Cortez, I. Exhibition of local but not systemic induced phenolic defenses in Vitis vinifera L. affected by brown wood streaking, grapevine leaf stripe, and apoplexy (Esca complex). Plants 2019, 8, 412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  12. Magnin-Robert, M.; Adrian, M.; Trouvelot, S.; Spagnolo, A.; Jacquens, L.; Letousey, P.; Rabenoelina, F.; Harir, M.; Roullier-Gall, C.; Clément, C.; et al. Alterations in grapevine leaf metabolism occur prior to esca apoplexy appearance. Mol. Plant-Microbe Interact. 2017, 30, 946–959. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Magnin-Robert, M.; Spagnolo, A.; Boulanger, A.; Joyeux, C.; Clément, C.; Abou-Mansour, E.; Fontaine, F. Changes in plant metabolism and accumulation of fungal metabolites in response to Esca proper and apoplexy expression in the whole grapevine. Phytopathology 2016, 106, 541–553. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Magnin-Robert, M.; Spagnolo, A.; Alayi, D.T.; Cilindre, C.; Mercier, L.; Schaeffer-Reiss, C.; Van Dorsselaer, A.; Clément, H.C.; Fontaine, F. Proteomic insights into changes in grapevine wood in response to esca proper and apoplexy. Phytopathol. Mediterr. 2014, 53, 168–187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Moret, F.; Delorme, G.; Clément, G.; Grosjean, C.; Lemaître-Guillier, C.; Trouvelot, S.; Adrian, M.; Fontaine, F. Esca-affected grapevine leaf metabolome is clone- and vintage-dependent. Physiol. Plant. 2020, 171, 424–434. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Goufo, P.; Cortez, I. A Lipidomic analysis of leaves of esca-affected grapevine suggests a role for galactolipids in the defense response and appearance of foliar symptoms. Biology 2020, 9, 268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Goufo, P.; Cortez, I. Dataset of levels and masses of lipid species in healthy, asymptomatic and symptomatic leaves of Vitis vinifera L. ’Malvasia Fina´ affected by Esca complex disease. Data Brief 2020, 33, 106469. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Sekulić, A.; Kilibarda, M.; Heuvelink, G.B.M.; Nikolić, M.; Bajat, B. Random Forest spatial interpolation. Remote Sens. 2020, 12, 1687. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Goufo, P.; Moutinho-Pereira, J.; Jorge, T.F.; Correia, C.M.; Oliveira, M.R.; Rosa, E.A.S.; Antonio, C.; Trindade, H. Cowpea (Vigna unguiculata L. Walp.) Metabolomics: Osmoprotection as a physiological strategy for drought stress resistance and improved yield. Front. Plant Sci. 2017, 8, 586. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  20. Goufo, P.; Singh, R.K.; Cortez, I. A Reference list of phenolic compounds (including stilbenes) in grapevine (Vitis vinifera L.) roots, woods, canes, stems, and leaves. Antioxidants 2020, 9, 398. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Symptomatic expression of esca complex disease in the leaves and woods (cross-sections) of Vitis vinifera L. ‘Malvasia-fina’ plants in a naturally infected vineyard. From left to right are healthy, asymptomatic, chlorotic, and scorched leaves, with a moisture content of ca., 65% [16].
Figure 1. Symptomatic expression of esca complex disease in the leaves and woods (cross-sections) of Vitis vinifera L. ‘Malvasia-fina’ plants in a naturally infected vineyard. From left to right are healthy, asymptomatic, chlorotic, and scorched leaves, with a moisture content of ca., 65% [16].
Blsf 11 00087 g001
Figure 2. Major classes of metabolites identified in the leaves of the grapevine cultivar Malvasia-fina.
Figure 2. Major classes of metabolites identified in the leaves of the grapevine cultivar Malvasia-fina.
Blsf 11 00087 g002
Figure 3. List of biosynthetic pathways affected by esca complex disease in the leaves of Vitis vinifera L. ‘Malvasia-fina’. The numeral values correspond to the number of metabolites belonging to each pathway.
Figure 3. List of biosynthetic pathways affected by esca complex disease in the leaves of Vitis vinifera L. ‘Malvasia-fina’. The numeral values correspond to the number of metabolites belonging to each pathway.
Blsf 11 00087 g003
Figure 4. Random Forest results of the analysis of 513 metabolites detected in leaves of Vitis vinifera L. ‘Malvasia-fina’ affected by esca complex disease. The insert plot represents the confusion matrix. The forest output for the top 30 metabolites that made the largest contribution to the differentiation of leaf groups: CTL = control healthy leaves; ASY = asymptomatic leaves; SY1 = symptomatic leaves with chlorosis; SY2 = symptomatic leaves with scorches.
Figure 4. Random Forest results of the analysis of 513 metabolites detected in leaves of Vitis vinifera L. ‘Malvasia-fina’ affected by esca complex disease. The insert plot represents the confusion matrix. The forest output for the top 30 metabolites that made the largest contribution to the differentiation of leaf groups: CTL = control healthy leaves; ASY = asymptomatic leaves; SY1 = symptomatic leaves with chlorosis; SY2 = symptomatic leaves with scorches.
Blsf 11 00087 g004
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Goufo, P.; Singh, R.K.; Cortez, I. Metabolites Differentiating Asymptomatic and Symptomatic Grapevine Plants (Vitis vinifera ‘Malvasia-Fina’) Infected with Esca Complex Disease-Associated Fungi. Biol. Life Sci. Forum 2022, 11, 87. https://doi.org/10.3390/IECPS2021-11923

AMA Style

Goufo P, Singh RK, Cortez I. Metabolites Differentiating Asymptomatic and Symptomatic Grapevine Plants (Vitis vinifera ‘Malvasia-Fina’) Infected with Esca Complex Disease-Associated Fungi. Biology and Life Sciences Forum. 2022; 11(1):87. https://doi.org/10.3390/IECPS2021-11923

Chicago/Turabian Style

Goufo, Piebiep, Rupesh Kumar Singh, and Isabel Cortez. 2022. "Metabolites Differentiating Asymptomatic and Symptomatic Grapevine Plants (Vitis vinifera ‘Malvasia-Fina’) Infected with Esca Complex Disease-Associated Fungi" Biology and Life Sciences Forum 11, no. 1: 87. https://doi.org/10.3390/IECPS2021-11923

APA Style

Goufo, P., Singh, R. K., & Cortez, I. (2022). Metabolites Differentiating Asymptomatic and Symptomatic Grapevine Plants (Vitis vinifera ‘Malvasia-Fina’) Infected with Esca Complex Disease-Associated Fungi. Biology and Life Sciences Forum, 11(1), 87. https://doi.org/10.3390/IECPS2021-11923

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop