Next Article in Journal
From Digital Natives to Zoom Graduates? Student Experiences with Distance Learning during Lockdown in Portugal
Next Article in Special Issue
From Sport to Work? Exploring Potentials in a Moroccan Sport-for-Employability Programme
Previous Article in Journal
How Emerging Adults Perceive Elements of Nature as Resources for Wellbeing: A Qualitative Photo-Elicitation Study
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Youth
Volume 2
Issue 3
10.3390/youth2030028
youth-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Brief Report

Macro-Determinants of NEET: An Ecological Study at the Country Level of Analysis for the Period 1997–2020

by
Simone Amendola
Department of Dynamic and Clinical Psychology, and Health Studies, Faculty of Medicine and Psychology, Sapienza University of Rome, 00185 Rome, Italy
Youth 2022, 2(3), 384-390; https://doi.org/10.3390/youth2030028
Submission received: 9 August 2022 / Revised: 3 September 2022 / Accepted: 4 September 2022 / Published: 5 September 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue School-to-Work Transition of NEETS)
Browse Figure
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
The aim of the present study was to examine macro-determinants of the Not Engaged in Employment, Education or Training (NEET) rate with the country as the unit of analysis. Data from 40 countries were extracted from the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) database. Linear mixed models were used to examine associations between the NEET rate and gross domestic product (GDP), population density, life expectancy, social spending, homicide rate, part-time employment, poverty, social inequality (GINI index), and education spending. As part of a sensitivity analysis, the analysis was repeated using open data from the World Bank Group. GDP and social spending were uniquely associated with the NEET rate after controlling for the effects of other factors. Social inequality, poverty, and education spending showed borderline significant associations with the NEET rate. The findings of the present ecological study showed associations between environmentally unfavourable conditions or harshness and the NEET rate at the country level and may inform appropriate policy measures to contain and promote a decrease in the NEET rate.

1. Introduction

At least one in ten European adolescents and emerging adults (15–29 years old) followed unsuccessful pathways of withdrawal from both the labour market and education in 2021, the so-called “Not Engaged in Employment, Education or Training” (NEET) rate, ranging from 5.5% in the Netherlands to 23.1% in Italy [1]. NEET status is explained not only by individual choices and characteristics (e.g., female gender, school attainment) but also by family background characteristics (e.g., parental education and jobless condition, sibling labour force status, immigrant parents) and socioeconomic factors [2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11]. Despite the NEET concept itself being somewhat problematic (e.g., it refers to a heterogeneous group of people, it defines young people in negative terms highlighting what they are not, it is associated with negative connotations) [12], the NEET phenomenon guarantees increasing attention from mental and public health experts [11,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20]. Long-term (more than five months) NEET status is associated with risk factors, such as taking a career role, seclusion at home, involvement in deviant activities, and addiction or health problems [11]. Inactivity and discomfort and a sense of uncertainty and instability are associated with the NEET condition [16]. Peer problems and symptoms of psychopathology generally precede the NEET condition [13,14,17,18,19] despite the fact that the inverse path has also been demonstrated [15]. A previous study [20] examined the risk of becoming socially and economically marginalized in Japan, showing that more than half of NEET participants (1.86% of the total sample) were in a hikikomori condition (1.06%). Accordingly, NEET and hikikomori could share psychological tendencies related to occupational and social withdrawal.
The risk of marginalization is associated with socioeconomic and cultural changes such as economic recession, job insecurity, and globalization [21,22,23,24,25]. It has been proposed that the existence of youth withdrawing from social and/or occupational life may represent a feasible life strategy associated with high-resource-abundance societies that would be maladaptive in poor societies [26]. In accordance, the NEET rate would positively correlate with the gross domestic product (GDP) per capita and social assistance policies at the population level of analysis [26]. To explain the association between resource availability and the risk of marginalization, some authors [26] have referred to the Life History Theory [27,28]. It posits that organisms pursue strategies that best help them allocate energy towards different survival and reproductive activities in a way that maximises their fitness [29]. Ecology unpredictability and harshness (e.g., levels of morbidity and mortality, resource availability, population density, intrasexual competition, and predator threat) are major factors in determining the optimal strategy of energy allocation [26,29,30,31,32,33].
Few studies have examined the macro-determinants of NEET. Bruno et al. [34] analysed the association between GDP and the NEET rate in European regions between 2000 and 2010. Bingol [35] explored the associations between GDP, inflation rate, education expenditure, foreign direct investment, human development index data, and the NEET rate in six countries (i.e., Russia, Brazil, India, Indonesia, South Africa, and Turkey) between 2005 and 2018. Caroleo et al. [36] analysed the different macro-determinants (i.e., school-to-work transition, labour market, and institutional variables) of the NEET status in 21 European countries in two selected years, 2007 and 2016. These studies showed negative associations between the NEET rate and GDP (i.e., as GDP increases, the NEET rate decreases) [34,35,36], education expenditure (i.e., as education expenditure increases, the NEET rate decreases) [35,36], and active labour market policies [36]. Further, positive associations between the NEET rate and the human development index [35] and passive subsidies to the unemployed were demonstrated [36]. On the contrary, another study [8] highlighted a positive correlation between GDP and the NEET rate. However, the findings of these studies were limited by the analysis of data from only a few countries, by the brief time periods considered, and/or by a small number of factors examined.
In light of the above, the main aim of the present study was to examine the associations between the NEET rate, GDP per capita, and social expenditure between 1997 and 2020 considering European and non-European countries. The hypothesis that rates of NEET would be positively correlated with GDP per capita and social expenditure (i.e., the NEET rate would be a sign of wealthy ecologies) was tested with the country as the unit of analysis. Further, the associations between the NEET rate and factors related to ecologically unfavourable conditions or unpredictability and harshness [26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33], such as population density, life expectancy, and violent crime (i.e., homicide rate), were explored. The role of poverty, social inequality (GINI index), education spending, and the percentage of part-time employment (as a proxy for job insecurity and environmental unpredictability [37]) was also investigated.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Data Source and Variables

All data were extracted from the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) database [38] on 18 June 2022. The definitions of the variables considered for analysis are summarized in Table S1 (Supplementary Material). The study was exempt from approval by an ethics committee because all data were collected in aggregated format from publicly available databases.

2.2. Statistical Analysis

Data from 40 countries were considered for analysis due to the availability of NEET data for at least one year for the period 1997–2020. The following analysis was conducted applying listwise deletion on the available data for a total of 767 potential observations for which data on NEET were available. To explore the associations between the NEET rate and the variables of interest, linear mixed models were fitted, including random (country-specific) intercept and modelling first-order autoregressive covariance for the residuals within the country using the restricted maximum likelihood estimates of parameters. To test the study hypothesis, two models were fitted analysing associations between the NEET rate and GDP, population density, life expectancy, and social spending (model 1), including the poverty rate, education spending, income inequality, the homicide rate, and the percentage of part-time employment (model 2). The analysis was repeated using open data from the World Bank Group [39] (extracted on 27 June 2022) as part of a sensitivity analysis. All analyses were carried out using R version 3.3.0.

3. Results

NEET rate trends according to each country for the period 1997–2020 are displayed in Figure 1, whereas descriptive characteristics and bivariate associations are reported in Tables S2 and S3 (Supplementary Material).
GDP and social spending were uniquely associated with the NEET rate after controlling for the effects of other variables (model 1, Table 1). Their effects persisted after controlling for important covariates (model 2, Table 1). Among the latter, social inequality, poverty, and education spending showed borderline significant associations with the NEET rate (p-values = 0.057, 0.09, and 0.10, respectively).
The sensitivity analysis, as reported in Tables S4 and S5 (Supplementary Material), provides further evidence of the associations between the NEET rate, GDP, and social inequality, whereas the association between the NEET rate and social spending was not statistically significant when controlling for the covariates.

4. Discussion

The present ecological study examined macro-determinants of the NEET rate at the country level. The results of principal and sensitivity analyses consistently showed a negative association between national GDP (per capita) and the NEET rate; i.e., as GDP increases, the NEET rate decreases. These results are in line with those of recent research demonstrating significant associations between these variables both in fragile economies [35] and in European countries [34]. In a previous study [36], national GDP per capita exerted a significant effect on the NEET rate even after controlling for personal characteristics predisposed to NEET status (e.g., gender, parents’ education, marital status, disabling conditions, immigrant status). The findings of the present study expand those of previous research, demonstrating a significant negative association between GDP and the NEET rate in both European and non-European countries over a long period of time, i.e., between 1997–2020. This result suggests that appropriate policy measures focused on socioeconomic factors and increasing investments and country-level productivity may contain and promote a decrease in the NEET rate [36]. Further, the results of the statistical analysis showed a positive association between social expenditure and the NEET rate. A previous study [36] demonstrated a positive association between passive subsidies to the unemployed and the NEET rate. Taken together, the study findings provide only partial support to the study hypothesis (i.e., the NEET rate as a sign of wealthy ecologies). Despite a positive association between social expenditure and the NEET rate, GDP per capita was not positively associated with the NEET rate; rather, it was negatively associated.
Further, some aspects indicating environmental harshness or national unfavourable conditions, such as social inequality as measured by the GINI index and the poverty rate, correlated positively with the NEET rate at the population level of analysis. These findings broaden scientific knowledge on the socioeconomic determinants of NEET, indicating that as a country’s social inequality and poverty increase, the NEET rate increases. Importantly, a tendency towards a significant negative association between education spending and the NEET rate was also observed. That is, as education spending increases, the NEET rate tends to decrease. Taken together, these findings support and expand those of other recent studies demonstrating that the share of NEET may derive from objective disadvantageous conditions at the country level. [36,40]. Consequently, active labour market programmes, apprenticeships, vocational education, and training programmes are useful measures that could be implemented to favour the school-to-work transition and youth employment [36,40,41].
The results of the present study need to be interpreted considering some limitations. First, the analyses are based on national and not individual data. Considering that the term NEET refers to a heterogeneous group of individuals, the analysis of individual data is needed to further explore the study hypothesis (e.g., using multi-level analysis) and draw firm conclusions at the individual unit of analysis [9]. A second limitation concerns the fact that the study results depend on primary data quality (i.e., data reporting and collection procedures). Despite sensitivity analyses being performed to minimize reliability problems, their results should be interpreted with caution due to differences in the operational definitions of some variables (e.g., NEET age coverage, social and education spending) between the two databases used for principal and sensitivity analysis (see Supplementary Material for additional information). Finally, labour force surveys were the preferred source of data on the NEET rate, and employment was generally defined according to a specific brief period (i.e., the reference week of the survey) (see Supplementary Material).
In conclusion, the findings of the present study highlighted that the NEET rate may result from unfavourable conditions at the country level of analysis. They emphasize the need to increase economic growth to reduce NEET rates. Social spending, social inequality, and poverty positively correlated with the NEET rate, whereas the increase in education spending may represent a protective factor at the country unit of analysis. Thus, decreasing inequality and improving economic opportunities and education spending (e.g., school-to-work transition programs) may help in containing and reducing the NEET rate.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/youth2030028/s1, Table S1: Variables included in the principal analysis and their definition as extracted from the OECD database; Table S2: Descriptive characteristics (mean and standard deviation) of the analysed OECD data for the period of 1997–2020; Table S3: Results of mixed models predicting bivariate associations between the NEET rate and variables of interest in countries considered for analysis controlling for the effect of time, 1997–2020 (OECD data); Table S4: Results of mixed models predicting bivariate associations between the NEET rate and variables of interest in countries considered for analysis controlling for the effect of time (World Bank data restricted to 40 countries); Table S5: Results of mixed models predicting associations between the NEET rate and variables of interest (World Bank data restricted to 40 countries); Table S6: Results of mixed models predicting bivariate associations between the NEET rate and variables of interest in countries considered for analysis controlling for the effect of time (World Bank data); Table S7: Results of mixed models predicting associations between the NEET rate and variables of interest (World Bank data); Table S8: Countries data analysed per year in model 2; Table S9: Country data analysed per country in model 2; Figure S1: National trends in the NEET rate for the 40 countries considered for sensitivity analysis, 1997–2020 (World Bank data); Figure S2: National trends in the NEET rate for the 167 countries considered for sensitivity analysis, 1997–2020 (World Bank data) (including countries in supplementary material).

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The databases from which the data were extracted are publicly available online (Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) database and open data of the World Bank Group).

Conflicts of Interest

The author declares no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Eurostat Statistics on Young People Neither in Employment Nor in Education or Training. Available online: https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/index.php?title=Statistics_on_young_people_neither_in_employment_nor_in_education_or_training (accessed on 17 June 2022).
  2. Amendola, S. Trends in Rates of NEET (Not in Education, Employment, or Training) Subgroups among Youth Aged 15 to 24 in Italy, 2004–2019. J. Public Health 2022, 30, 2221–2229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Curry, M.; Mooi-Reci, I.; Wooden, M. Parental Joblessness and the Moderating Role of a University Degree on the School-to-Work Transition in Australia and the United States. Soc. Sci. Res. 2019, 81, 61–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. De Luca, G.; Mazzocchi, P.; Quintano, C.; Rocca, A. Italian NEETs in 2005–2016: Have the Recent Labour Market Reforms Produced Any Effect? CESifo Econ. Stud. 2019, 65, 154–176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Dorsett, R.; Lucchino, P. Explaining Patterns in the School-to-Work Transition: An Analysis Using Optimal Matching. Adv. Life Course Res. 2014, 22, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Egan, M.; Daly, M.; Delaney, L. Childhood Psychological Distress and Youth Unemployment: Evidence from Two British Cohort Studies. Soc. Sci. Med. 2015, 124, 11–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Lőrinc, M.; Ryan, L.; D’Angelo, A.; Kaye, N. De-Individualising the ‘NEET Problem’: An Ecological Systems Analysis. Eur. Educ. Res. J. 2020, 19, 412–427. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Naraswati, N.P.G.; Jatmiko, Y.A. Individual and Province-Level Determinants of Unemployed NEET as Young People’s Productivity Indicator in Indonesia During 2020: A Multilevel Analysis Approach. In Proceedings of the 2021 International Conference on Data Science and Official Statistics (ICDSOS), Jacarta, Indonesia, 13–14 November 2021; Volume 2021, pp. 782–795. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Norasakkunkit, V.; Uchida, Y.; Takemura, K. Evaluating Distal and Proximal Explanations for Withdrawal: A Rejoinder to Varnum and Kwon’s “The Ecology of Withdrawal”. Front. Psychol. 2017, 8, 2085. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Quintano, C.; Mazzocchi, P.; Rocca, A. The Determinants of Italian NEETs and the Effects of the Economic Crisis. Genus 2018, 74, 5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Su, X.; Wong, V.; To, S. Characteristics of Longer-Term versus Transitional NEETs in Hong Kong: Implications for Career Support Services. Br. J. Guid. Couns. 2022, 1–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Liszka, D.; Walawender, P. Neet youth–the concept’s presence in the European Union’s youth employment policy and why it is so problematic. Humanit. Soc. Sci. 2018, 25, 179–193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Bania, E.V.; Eckhoff, C.; Kvernmo, S. Not Engaged in Education, Employment or Training (NEET) in an Arctic Sociocultural Context: The NAAHS Cohort Study. BMJ Open 2019, 9, e023705. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Gariépy, G.; Danna, S.M.; Hawke, L.; Henderson, J.; Iyer, S.N. The Mental Health of Young People Who Are Not in Education, Employment, or Training: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Soc. Psychiatry Psychiatr. Epidemiol. 2022, 57, 1107–1121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Gutiérrez-García, R.A.; Benjet, C.; Borges, G.; Méndez Ríos, E.; Medina-Mora, M.E. NEET Adolescents Grown up: Eight-Year Longitudinal Follow-up of Education, Employment and Mental Health from Adolescence to Early Adulthood in Mexico City. Eur. Child Adolesc. Psychiatry 2017, 26, 1459–1469. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Parola, A.; Donsì, L. Sospesi nel tempo. Inattività e malessere percepito in giovani adulti NEET. Psicol. Della Salut. 2018, 3, 44–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Rodwell, L.; Romaniuk, H.; Nilsen, W.; Carlin, J.B.; Lee, K.J.; Patton, G.C. Adolescent Mental Health and Behavioural Predictors of Being NEET: A Prospective Study of Young Adults Not in Employment, Education, or Training. Psychol. Med. 2018, 48, 861–871. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Symonds, J.; Dietrich, J.; Chow, A.; Salmela-Aro, K. Mental Health Improves after Transition from Comprehensive School to Vocational Education or Employment in England: A National Cohort Study. Dev. Psychol. 2016, 52, 652–665. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Tayfur, S.N.; Prior, S.; Roy, A.S.; Maciver, D.; Forsyth, K.; Fitzpatrick, L.I. Associations between Adolescent Psychosocial Factors and Disengagement from Education and Employment in Young Adulthood among Individuals with Common Mental Health Problems. J. Youth Adolesc. 2022, 51, 1397–1408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Uchida, Y.; Norasakkunkit, V. The NEET and Hikikomori Spectrum: Assessing the Risks and Consequences of Becoming Culturally Marginalized. Front. Psychol. 2015, 6, 1117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Furlong, A. The Japanese Hikikomori Phenomenon: Acute Social Withdrawal among Young People. Sociol. Rev. 2008, 56, 309–325. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Norasakkunkit, V.; Uchida, Y. Psychological Consequences of Postindustrial Anomie on Self and Motivation Among Japanese Youth. J. Soc. Issues 2011, 67, 774–786. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Suwa, M.; Suzuki, K. The Phenomenon of “Hikikomori” (Social Withdrawal) and the Socio-Cultural Situation in Japan Today. J. Psychopathol. 2013, 19, 191–198. [Google Scholar]
  24. Teo, A.R.; Stufflebam, K.W.; Kato, T.A. The Intersection of Culture and Solitude: The Hikikomori Phenomenon in Japan. In The Handbook of Solitude; Coplan, R.J., Bowker, J.C., Eds.; Wiley: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2013; pp. 445–460. ISBN 978-1-118-42736-1. [Google Scholar]
  25. Toivonen, T.; Norasakkunkit, V.; Uchida, Y. Unable to Conform, Unwilling to Rebel? Youth, Culture, and Motivation in Globalizing Japan. Front. Psychol. 2011, 2, 207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Varnum, M.E.W.; Kwon, J.Y. The Ecology of Withdrawal. Commentary: The NEET and Hikikomori Spectrum: Assessing the Risks and Consequences of Becoming Culturally Marginalized. Front. Psychol. 2016, 7, 764. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Del Giudice, M.; Gangestad, S.W.; Kaplan, H.S. Life History Theory and Evolutionary Psychology. In The Handbook of Evolutionary Psychology: Foundations, 2nd ed; John Wiley Sons, Inc.: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2016; Volume 1, pp. 88–114. ISBN 978-1-118-75588-4. [Google Scholar]
  28. Kaplan, H.S.; Gangestad, S.W. Life History Theory and Evolutionary Psychology. In The Handbook of Evolutionary Psychology; John Wiley Sons, Inc.: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2005; pp. 68–95. ISBN 978-0-471-26403-3. [Google Scholar]
  29. Brumbach, B.H.; Figueredo, A.J.; Ellis, B.J. Effects of Harsh and Unpredictable Environments in Adolescence on Development of Life History Strategies: A Longitudinal Test of an Evolutionary Model. Hum. Nat. 2009, 20, 25–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Ellis, B.J.; Figueredo, A.J.; Brumbach, B.H.; Schlomer, G.L. Fundamental Dimensions of Environmental Risk: The Impact of Harsh versus Unpredictable Environments on the Evolution and Development of Life History Strategies. Hum. Nat. 2009, 20, 204–268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Griskevicius, V.; Delton, A.W.; Robertson, T.E.; Tybur, J.M. Environmental Contingency in Life History Strategies: The Influence of Mortality and Socioeconomic Status on Reproductive Timing. J. Personal. Soc. Psychol. 2011, 100, 241–254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Hackman, J.; Hruschka, D. Fast Life Histories, Not Pathogens, Account for State-Level Variation in Homicide, Child Maltreatment, and Family Ties in the U.S. Evol. Hum. Behav. 2013, 34, 118–124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Rotella, A.; Varnum, M.E.W.; Sng, O.; Grossmann, I. Increasing Population Densities Predict Decreasing Fertility Rates over Time: A 174-Nation Investigation. Am. Psychol. 2021, 76, 933–946. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Bruno, G.S.F.; Marelli, E.; Signorelli, M. The Rise of NEET and Youth Unemployment in EU Regions after the Crisis. Comp. Econ. Stud. 2014, 56, 592–615. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Bїngöl, U. The Macroeconomic Determinants of NEET: A Panel Data Analysis for Fragile Five Countries and Russia. J. Manag. Econ. Res. 2020, 18, 173–189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Caroleo, F.E.; Rocca, A.; Mazzocchi, P.; Quintano, C. Being NEET in Europe Before and After the Economic Crisis: An Analysis of the Micro and Macro Determinants. Soc. Indic. Res. 2020, 149, 991–1024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Bono, E.D.; Weber, A.; Winter-Ebmer, R. Fertility and Economic Instability: The Role of Unemployment and Job Displacement. J. Popul. Econ. 2015, 28, 463–478. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. OECD. OECD.Stat. Available online: https://stats.oecd.org/ (accessed on 14 June 2022).
  39. The World Bank. World Bank Open Data. Free and Open Access to Global Development Data. Available online: https://data.worldbank.org/ (accessed on 27 June 2022).
  40. Maynou, L.; Ordóñez, J.; Silva, J.I. Convergence and Determinants of Young People Not in Employment, Education or Training: An European Regional Analysis. Econ. Model. 2022, 110, 105808. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Biavaschi, C.; Eichhorst, W.; Giulietti, C.; Kendzia, M.J.; Muravyev, A.; Pieters, J.; Rodríguez-Planas, N.; Schmidl, R.; Zimmermann, K.F. Youth Unemployment and Vocational Training; World Bank: Washington, DC, USA, 2012. [Google Scholar]
Youth 02 00028 g001 550
Figure 1. National trends in NEET rate for the 40 countries considered for analysis, 1997–2020 (OECD data). Note. AUS: Australia, AUT: Austria, BEL: Belgium, BRA: Brazil, CAN: Canada, CHE: Switzerland, CHL: Chile, COL: Colombia, CRI: Costa Rica, CZE: Czech Republic, DEU: Germany, DNK: Denmark, ESP: Spain, EST: Estonia, FIN: Finland, FRA: France, GBR: United Kingdom, GRC: Greece, HUN: Hungary, IRL: Ireland, ISL: Island, ISR: Israel, ITA: Italy, JPN: Japan, LTU: Lithuania, LUX: Luxembourg, LVA: Latvia, MEX: Mexico, NLD: the Netherlands, NOR: Norway, NZL: New Zealand, POL: Poland, PRT: Portugal, RUS: Russia, SVK: Slovakia, SVN: Slovenia, SWE: Sweden, TUR: Turkey, USA: United States, ZAF: South Africa.
Figure 1. National trends in NEET rate for the 40 countries considered for analysis, 1997–2020 (OECD data). Note. AUS: Australia, AUT: Austria, BEL: Belgium, BRA: Brazil, CAN: Canada, CHE: Switzerland, CHL: Chile, COL: Colombia, CRI: Costa Rica, CZE: Czech Republic, DEU: Germany, DNK: Denmark, ESP: Spain, EST: Estonia, FIN: Finland, FRA: France, GBR: United Kingdom, GRC: Greece, HUN: Hungary, IRL: Ireland, ISL: Island, ISR: Israel, ITA: Italy, JPN: Japan, LTU: Lithuania, LUX: Luxembourg, LVA: Latvia, MEX: Mexico, NLD: the Netherlands, NOR: Norway, NZL: New Zealand, POL: Poland, PRT: Portugal, RUS: Russia, SVK: Slovakia, SVN: Slovenia, SWE: Sweden, TUR: Turkey, USA: United States, ZAF: South Africa.
Youth 02 00028 g001
Table
Table 1. Results of mixed models predicting associations between the NEET rate and the variables of interest, 1997–2020 (OECD data).
Table 1. Results of mixed models predicting associations between the NEET rate and the variables of interest, 1997–2020 (OECD data).
Model 1 aModel 2 b
β (SE)95%CIt (df = 234)Bpβ (SE)95%CIt (df = 73)Bp
Intercept0.02 (0.15)−0.28, 0.320.1415.480.89−0.07 (0.15)−0.37, 0.23−0.4816.640.63
Time0.09 (0.08)−0.07, 0.251.120.100.26−0.001 (0.08)−0.17, 0.16−0.01−0.000.99
Gross domestic product
(per capita)		−0.47 (0.11)−0.69, −0.25−4.21−0.19 0.001−0.44 (0.15)−0.75, −0.13−2.85−0.160.006
Population density−0.04 (0.16)−0.36, 0.27−0.26−0.000.79−0.08 (0.14)−0.37, 0.21−0.56−0.010.57
Life expectancy−0.02 (0.11)−0.24, 0.2−0.20−0.060.840.02 (0.17)−0.32, 0.360.100.040.92
Social spending0.20 (0.07)0.05, 0.342.610.240.010.28 (0.14)0.01, 0.552.090.360.04
Homicide----------0.02 (0.10)−0.19, 0.220.150.10.88
Part-time job----------−0.03 (0.16)−0.35, 0.29−0.18−0.020.86
Poverty----------0.30 (0.18)−0.06, 0.661.660.460.10
Social inequality----------0.38 (0.2)−0.01, 0.771.9440.810.06
Education spending----------−0.16 (0.09)−0.34, 0.03−1.72−1.270.09
a: all variables fitted jointly except covariates (274 observations for 35 countries), b: all variables fitted jointly including covariates (111 observations for 28 countries), β: standardized coefficient, SE: standard errors, CI: confidence interval, t: value of the t statistic, df: degree of freedom, B: unstandardized coefficient. All predictors were centred on the mean.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Amendola, S. Macro-Determinants of NEET: An Ecological Study at the Country Level of Analysis for the Period 1997–2020. Youth 2022, 2, 384-390. https://doi.org/10.3390/youth2030028

AMA Style

Amendola S. Macro-Determinants of NEET: An Ecological Study at the Country Level of Analysis for the Period 1997–2020. Youth. 2022; 2(3):384-390. https://doi.org/10.3390/youth2030028

Chicago/Turabian Style

Amendola, Simone. 2022. "Macro-Determinants of NEET: An Ecological Study at the Country Level of Analysis for the Period 1997–2020" Youth 2, no. 3: 384-390. https://doi.org/10.3390/youth2030028

APA Style

Amendola, S. (2022). Macro-Determinants of NEET: An Ecological Study at the Country Level of Analysis for the Period 1997–2020. Youth, 2(3), 384-390. https://doi.org/10.3390/youth2030028

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop