Next Article in Journal
A Review of Photovoltaic Module Failure and Degradation Mechanisms: Causes and Detection Techniques
Previous Article in Journal
Impact of Flexibility Implementation on the Control of a Solar District Heating System
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Solar
Volume 4
Issue 1
10.3390/solar4010002
solar-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

A Review on Solar Drying Devices: Heat Transfer, Air Movement and Type of Chambers

by
Lisete Fernandes
1,* and
Pedro B. Tavares
1,2
1
CQ-VR Centro de Química-Vila Real, UME-CIDE Unidade de Microscopia Eletrónica-Centro de Investigação e Desenvolvimento, Universidade de Trás-os-Montes e Alto Douro, 5000-801 Vila Real, Portugal
2
Departamento de Química, ECVA Escola de Ciências da Vida e do Ambiente, CQ-VR Centro de Química-Vila Real, Universidade de Trás-os-Montes e Alto Douro, 5000-801 Vila Real, Portugal
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Solar 2024, 4(1), 15-42; https://doi.org/10.3390/solar4010002
Submission received: 9 October 2023 / Revised: 19 December 2023 / Accepted: 4 January 2024 / Published: 8 January 2024
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Food waste is one of the biggest challenges we are facing nowadays. According to the Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) of the United Nations, approximately one-third of all food produced in the world is lost at some stage between production and consumption, totaling 930 million tons of food per year. Meanwhile, 10.5% of humanity suffers from malnutrition, 26% are overweight and greenhouse gases derived from the food industry account for between 25 and 30% of total emissions (8 to 10% referring to food waste), exacerbating the current climate crisis. To address these concerns, there has been a growing inclination to seek alternatives to fossil fuels, including the adoption of solar energy across diverse sectors, including the food industry. Actions are needed in order to change these patterns. This review article aims to provide an overview of recent developments in the field of solar food dehydration and the types of dehydrators that have emerged. Extensive research and bibliographic analysis, including other review articles, have revealed a growing focus on investment in this area to develop solar dehydrators that are increasingly effective but as sustainable as possible.

1. Introduction

As is generally known, fossil fuels take millions of years to form. The world’s heavy reliance on non-renewable energy sources in its energy matrix leads to a depletion of reserves as consumption surpasses production [1]. The most alarming aspect of this reality is the environmental impact it carries, manifesting in numerous problems such as global warming (caused by excessive CO2 emissions), acid rain (resulting from pollutants reacting with water vapor), air pollution and water contamination [2]. Consequently, the availability of fossil fuels is under threat, putting global energy production at risk [3]. Various agreements have already been established, such as the Kyoto Protocol and the Paris Agreement. The quest for alternative energy sources to replace fossil fuels is essential for environmental preservation and combating climate change [4].
The energy transition cannot be solved with the simple and sudden abandonment of fossil fuel sources. This process should provide for a gradual elimination to ensure stability, resilience and efficiency. The targets are well-defined: by 2030, global emissions related to the energy sector must reduce by 30% below 2019 levels and by 75% by 2040 to achieve the goal of zero net emissions by 2050 (United Nations Sustainable Development Goals). Although renewable energies are presented as alternatives, they currently do not produce enough energy to fully replace traditional sources.
Among renewable energy options, solar energy stands out as the most abundant. The sunlight that reaches Earth every day dwarfs all other energy sources on the planet, with a rate approximately 10,000 times greater than humanity’s current energy consumption [5]. This vast potential of solar energy could theoretically meet all of mankind’s energy needs if it can be harnessed and stored in a cost-effective manner.
When solar radiation passes through the atmosphere, some of it is absorbed or scattered due to clouds, air molecules, aerosols and water vapor. As a result, the direct normal irradiance (DNI) represents the solar radiation that directly reaches the Earth’s surface (Figure 1).
The solar constant, approximately 1367 W/m2 at the mean Earth-Sun distance at the top of the atmosphere, represents the value of solar radiation [6]. Around 165 petawatts (PW) of solar energy are received on the Earth’s surface. Out of this, about 30% is reflected back into space, while 47% is converted into low-temperature heat through various processes such as water evaporation (23%), wind (23%) and kinetic energy in waves (0.5%) [7]. On a clear day, at noon, the direct beam radiation on the Earth’s surface can reach approximately 1000 W/m2. The harvesting of solar energy is influenced by factors such as location, season, time of day and weather conditions [8]. Solar technologies offer a versatile range of applications, delivering heat, cooling, natural lighting, electricity and fuels, making them a vibrant research topic that attracts scientists to explore diverse approaches [9,10]. Solar energy is becoming increasingly popular due to its abundance, availability, cost-effectiveness and environmentally friendly nature. It is essentially free of charge, harnessing the sun’s energy as a renewable and sustainable resource.
Regardless, the utilization of solar energy to dry fresh food products is one of the oldest preservation techniques used by humans. The earliest recorded instance of drying is for vegetables, dating back to the 18th century, by Van Arsdel and Copley (1963). Drying involves two fundamental and simultaneous processes: the transfer of heat to evaporate the liquid and the transfer of mass as a liquid or vapor within the solid and as a vapor from the surface. During the drying process, moisture transfer occurs in two main stages: external mass transfer, which involves the evaporation of moisture from the product’s surface into the surrounding air and internal mass transfer, which refers to the movement of moisture from inside the product towards its surface [11].
The conventional drying system, known as open sun drying, involves directly exposing food to the wind and sun, spreading it in a thin layer over the ground or using trays. This method is commonly used for agricultural goods and other products, serving the purpose of preserving them for later use, especially in the case of food, or as an integral part of the production process, as seen in wood and tobacco drying. However, it comes with several limitations and challenges. One of the major drawbacks of open sun drying is the susceptibility of the crops to various external factors. This includes damage caused by birds, rodents, dust, rain, direct exposure to radiation, insect infestations and microorganisms [12,13,14]. Such issues can lead to significant post-harvest losses and negatively impact the overall quality of the dried products. Moreover, open sun drying requires a large area for the process to be efficient and it lacks the ability to control external drying parameters such as moisture content and temperature [15]. This lack of control can further contribute to inconsistent drying results and may not be suitable for certain products that require specific drying conditions. Given these disadvantages, there is a need for more advanced and controlled drying methods to minimize post-harvest losses and ensure better preservation and quality of dried food and other products.
The advancement in sun drying techniques has led to the development of solar drying systems composed of closed devices that trap and utilize the sun’s radiation to increase the internal temperature [16]. The key difference between solar and solar drying lies in the utilization of equipment to collect the sun’s radiation and trap it. Solar drying has found widespread application not only in agriculture but also in various industrial sectors, including the seafood, pharmaceutical, paper, ceramic and biomass processing industries [11]. Numerous studies have been conducted over time to investigate the dehydration of different types of crops using both open sun drying and solar drying devices, either as additional means or for comparison purposes [17,18].
The primary advantages of solar dryers over traditional sun drying are focused on drying times, higher efficiency, improved hygiene, healthier end products and cost-effectiveness [12]. By utilizing solar energy, these systems offer a more controlled environment for the drying process, leading to better quality and reduced post-harvest losses.

2. Technology of the Dryer

Solar dryers work based on the principle of transmitting heat from a source to the product being dried and facilitating the transfer of moisture from the product’s surface to the surrounding atmosphere [19]. Successful food drying requires the removal of moisture from the product, with dry air absorbing it and air movement helping to carry it away [7]. Due to the aim of utilizing free and renewable solar energy, various types of solar dryers have been presented in the literature [20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27].
Researchers have explored different approaches to enhance the efficiency of these devices, such as improving insulation, heat recovery, recirculation and optimizing operating systems. Furthermore, achieving similar results can be possible by substituting the system’s energy supply with combined heat and power methods [28]. Conventionally, solar dryers are classified in different ways according to heat transfer, air movement and type of chamber (Figure 2).

3. Working Principle

3.1. Mode of Heat Transfer

According to the incidence of the solar radiance as a working principle, the solar dryers can be classified into open sun, direct (with cabinet), indirect or hybrid [29]:

3.1.1. Open Sun Drying (OSD)

Also called natural drying, in this method, solar radiation directly impacts the surface of the crop, which is generally spread on the ground (Figure 3).
Short-wavelength solar energy was received for the majority of the day, along with natural air circulation facilitated by the wind. The absorbed radiation converted into thermal energy increases crop temperature, which is improved by the color of the product, facilitating dehydration. There are some energy losses from reflective, evaporative and convective modes, which decrease the efficiency of the process (Table 1).

3.1.2. Direct Solar Drying (DSD)

In direct solar drying, the sun is the only source of energy in all processes. The product can be exposed or protected, and solar radiation is incident on a transparent cover, typically made of plastic or glass (Figure 4).
The glass reflects a portion of the solar radiation back into the atmosphere, while the remaining part goes into the drying chamber. Inside the chamber, some of the transmitted radiance is reflected back from the surface of the crop, while the rest is absorbed. This absorption leads to an increase in temperature inside the chamber and above the crop. The use of glass reduces convective losses to the environment. However, convective and evaporative losses still occur inside the chamber from the heated crop. The air entering the chamber through air holes and escaping through an aperture at the top of the cabinet takes the moisture away from the crop. Direct solar drying systems can be classified into various types, including cabinet-type, tunnel-type and greenhouse-type dryers, based on their specific configurations and designs. Each type offers distinct advantages and is suitable for different applications depending on factors such as the type of product being dried, local climate conditions and required drying efficiency (Table 2).

3.1.3. Indirect Solar Drying (ISD)

The principal differences between ISD and DSD are in their heat transfer and vapor removal methods. In indirect solar dryers, the crops are placed in trays or shelves inside an opaque drying cabinet in an independent unit from the solar collector (Figure 5).
The solar collector is responsible for heating the atmospheric air, which is then conducted to the drying chamber. The air can be heated actively using a fan or passively through natural convection. The heated air is then transferred to the wet crop, where it evaporates moisture. This occurs because of the difference in moisture concentration between the drying air and the surface of the material. The drying process in ISD happens as water is exchanged between the product and the flowing hot air (Table 3).

3.1.4. Hybrid Solar Drying (HSD)

Hybrid dryers are devices that combine two or more drying techniques, utilizing both direct solar radiation and electrical energy or stored heat, along with ventilators to ensure proper air circulation. These dryers can operate in forced convection or passive modes, depending on the design and application. The primary purpose of developing hybrid dryers is to overcome the limitations of other types of solar dryers and improve overall drying efficiency (Figure 6).
This kind of dryer can use various heating processes, such as fossil fuel, gas, biomass, or electric heating, in conjunction with solar heating. They often incorporate photovoltaic (PV) panels to generate electricity, which can be integrated into the drying system. For example, PV modules can capture solar radiation and convert it into electricity, which can power fans for forced air circulation integrated with greenhouse dryers. It is suitable for single and combined techniques, as well as direct and indirect types.
The principal components of hybrid dryers include a drying chamber made of materials such as aluminum or wood, a solar collector (e.g., a flat plate or other collectors) to capture and convert solar radiation into thermal energy and an additional energy generator or accumulator for heat exchange. In cases where solar energy is utilized, the PV module captures solar radiation and converts it into electricity, while the collectors absorb solar energy to increase the air temperature. The heated air is then directed into the drying chamber to reduce the moisture content of the crop. Fans ensure forced air circulation and are powered by the electricity generated from the PV module.
By combining different energy sources and techniques, hybrid dryers offer more control over the drying process, allowing for better optimization of drying conditions and improved product quality (Table 4).

3.2. Mode of Air Movement

Another way to classify the types of solar dryers is by taking into account the air movement. They are classified into passive, when they use natural convection; active, where the utilization of an electric fan creates airflow [79]; and mixed-mode, when both types are used.

3.2.1. Passive Solar Dryers Systems

Often referred to as natural ventilation or convection solar dryers, they depend on the normal movement of the air that is heated by solar energy and spreads on the crop’s surface. In passive-mode dryers, there are several types available.

Direct Passive Solar Dryers

In a direct passive solar dryer, the crop is protected with a transparent cover, allowing solar radiation to pass through. It is then converted into thermal energy within the drying chamber through the greenhouse effect. The primary objective of this type of solar dryer is to reduce the moisture content of the products and this is achieved through the process of evaporation by diffusion [80,81].

Cabinet Passive Solar Dryers

The passive solar cabinet dryers [82] are generally inexpensive and straightforward to construct. They consist of a small box, most of the time made of wood, painted black to better absorb the solar radiation transmitted through a plastic or glass cover. Normally, the products to dry are placed in aluminum or plastic trays with wire mesh or perforated at the bottom. The trays are spaced apart to ensure adequate airflow through the products. The base of the cabinet is designed with holes to allow ambient air to enter, pass through the product placed on the wire mesh trays and then escape through holes at the top of the cabinet, carrying away moisture vapors [83].
Compared to open sun drying and direct passive solar dryers, this type of dryer has demonstrated better efficiency and improved product quality. The enclosed cabinet design and controlled airflow help create a more favorable drying environment, minimizing the negative effects of external factors such as dust, insects and weather changes. The black-painted surface of the cabinet facilitates better solar energy absorption, promoting more efficient drying.
Some authors classify cabinet solar dryers into normal and reverse absorber types [84]. The normal absorber represents the basic structure of a common passive solar cabinet dryer. The biggest disadvantages are the discoloration of the crop and the convective heat loss. In the reverse absorber cabinet, a reflector is placed under the drying chamber. The transparent cover is tilted at a 45° angle to maximize solar radiation exposure. The absorber plate captures the solar radiation and directs it to the reflector, which then redirects the solar heat to the drying chamber. As a result, the hot air enters the cabinet and circulates through the crop, effectively removing its moisture content with the heated air. The hot air becomes humid due to moisture evaporation from the crop and is eventually released through a vent or exit hole in the cabinet.

Greenhouse Passive Dryers

The utilization of a greenhouse dryer is a way to optimize direct solar drying. It is based on a structure with extensive glazing walls and roofs (glass, fiber-reinforced polymers and polyethylene film) and is divided into dome types, which are better for maximum utilization of global solar radiation and roof types, which are better for suitable mixing of air inside. They can also be called tent dryers; they are designed with vents of appropriate size and position to have controlled air flow. The air flow into the dryer can be controlled by rolling or unrolling the cladding at the bottom edge of the front side. The drying chamber is heated by the incident solar radiation and the heated air becomes less dense than the ambient air, which leads to the dehydration of products. The crop is laid on the floor above plastic sheets or in trays. The remotion of moisture occurs by natural convection [22,27,31,85,86,87].

Indirect Passive Solar Dryers

This is an indirect solar dryer that operates on the principle of natural convection. In the drying chamber, the crop is dried with the help of hot air provided by the solar air heater, and it passes out via an overhead vent. Crops are spread on trays without overlapping inside the drying chamber. The air flow rate is very low, as is the heat transfer [52,56,88,89,90].

Mixed-Mode Passive Solar Dryers

These dryers have the advantage of using both direct and indirect airflows. The passive mode of airflow depends on weather conditions combined with the greenhouse effect. Solar energy is captured directly in the drying chamber and indirectly through the solar air heater or collector. Such dryers can be used for a variety of crops that are suitable for low-temperature thermal drying (Figure 7) [21,91,92,93,94,95].

3.2.2. Active Solar Dryers Systems

In the sequence of open sun drying and passive solar dryers, the active ones started to be built. They work on the principle of forced convection to transfer heat, using fans or ventilation. They can sometimes incorporate external heaters to preheat incoming air. These dryers are suitable for crops with high water content and do not require very high drying temperatures. There is a large variety of designs that can be divided in direct, indirect and mixed-mode dryers [100,101].

Direct Active Solar Dryers

The structure is almost the same as passive. The introduction of fans or blowers creates a forced draft in the dryer. They can be cabinet or greenhouse-type.

Indirect Active Solar Dryers

These kinds of devices have a separate collector and drying chamber. Due to the separate air heating unit, higher temperatures can easily be obtained with a controlled air flow rate. Products dried in this dryer are found to have good nutrient quality and color. Studies show that the influence of drying air temperature on the variation of moisture versus drying time in the food process is more significant compared to the influence of air-drying velocity [65,102,103].

Mixed-Mode Active Solar Dryers

Mixed-mode active solar dryers have almost the same design as passive ones, with the incorporation of fans or blowers. Both the solar collector and drying chamber receive solar radiation, which makes the mixed-mode dryer more efficient for the drying process due to its higher thermal rate (Figure 8; Table 5) [95,104].

3.3. Type of chamber

Another way to divide the classification of solar dryers is based on the type of chamber, which can be a greenhouse or cabinet, as previously described. There are a variety of ways to dispose of the products to dry. They can be placed on trays or racks inside, or the chamber can be similar to a conventional oven, with various configurations. In the case of mixed-mode dryers, the chamber integrates both direct and indirect heating methods effectively. For hybrid dryers, the chamber is designed to accommodate both solar heating components and the additional energy source. The choice of chamber type is crucial to optimizing all the processes and achieving good drying results.

4. Hybrid Solar Dryers

This kind of dryer is, by definition, designed and constructed using direct solar energy and a heat exchanger. The products are dried under direct solar radiation and/or backup energy or stored heat when sunlight is not available. These types of dryers are used in single and mixed modes of drying. Several studies have been developed to test different techniques to improve solar dryers, considering the possible use of thermal storage materials, the deep bed drying method, improved solar collector designs and energy hybridization. They can be divided several ways, depending on their construction [107,122,123].

4.1. With Thermal Energy Storage (TES)

Due to the limitation of solar dryers operating only during sunlight hours, thermal storage emerges as a great solution. It allows the stored heat to be used during the night, ensuring continuous drying and preventing rehydration of the products. During off-sunshine hours, microbial activity may lead to the growth of microorganisms and the extended drying periods can degrade the quality of agricultural products, resulting in poor product quality and spoilage [66,124,125,126,127,128,129,130,131,132].
The integration of a TES unit is needed, and numerous studies have tested it. Some authors divided it into:
  • Sensible heat storage (SHS): materials are heated to store excess solar energy, depending on their specific heat capacity, mass and temperature. The best properties of these materials are density, thermal conductivity and stability. For example, materials such as brick, aluminum, gravel, river rocks, concrete, granite and limestone can be used. The rock bed is the most common material for sensible storage used in solar dryer systems [133,134];
  • Latent heat storage (LHS): in this kind of material, solar energy is stored during the phase change process. The phase change materials (PCM) can be organic (such as paraffin, like wax n-alkanes and methyl groups) or non-paraffin types (like fatty acids, glycols, alcohols and esters), inorganic (salt hydrates and metallic) or eutectic composition [128,135];
  • Thermo-chemical energy storage (TCES): it is based on the principle that all chemical reactions either absorb or release heat. This process stores energy by using high-energy chemical processes. In this case, the heat stored depends on the amount of storage material, the endothermic heat of the reaction and the extent of conversion [136,137,138].

4.2. With an Auxiliary Unit

The dryer can operate on solar energy, but for additional heating, auxiliary units are used. The most common are fuelled with fossil fuel or biomass to reach and maintain the required temperature. Despite their effectiveness, their availability is limited, and they are associated with environmental pollution issues. Amer and Gottschalk [139] used electric resistances as auxiliary units in fresh chamomile drying; Matouk et al. [140] used them for onion slices; and Hossain et al. [141] used them for tomato slices [142]. Ferreira et al. [143] applied 20 incandescent lamps, 100 W each, for drying banana slices. Suherman et al. [144] used SUS (stainless steel) plates as heat collectors for solar radiation and an LPG (liquefied petroleum gas) burner in seaweed drying. Many studies have been conducted on this type of dryer in various contexts [145].

4.3. With Photovoltaic (PV)

Solar dryers with PV assistance are probably the most widely used. Thermal energy can be obtained from solar radiation by using solar collectors and it is converted via PV panels into direct current electricity [146]. These kinds of systems have a huge variety of possible configurations and can range from the simplest forms, such as powering fans to provide air circulation, to making a significant contribution to the decarbonization of electricity production. The PV-ventilated system is very common in greenhouse dryers [147,148,149,150,151,152]. The integrated arrangement for applying thermal energy as well as electrical energy with a PV module is referred to as a hybrid PV/T system [18,73,153,154,155,156,157,158,159,160,161]. The integration of PV panels with solar dryers ensures a continuous and reliable power supply, reducing dependency on the grid and further promoting sustainability in the drying process.

4.4. With Heat Pump

Some authors defend that combining a solar thermal energy source, such as solar thermal collectors with a heat pump dryer, will assist in reducing the operation cost of drying and producing products of high quality [162]. The aim of installing a heat pump is to solve the problem of the intermittent availability of solar radiation. Depending on weather conditions, four working modes can be chosen [163,164,165,166,167,168,169,170,171,172,173,174]:
  • Solar energy heating mode, when solar radiation is sufficient during the daytime;
  • Heat pump heating mode when solar radiation is unavailable;
  • Solar-assisted heat pump heating mode, when solar radiation is insufficient during the daytime;
  • Heat pump dehumidification mode when ambient humidity is high.
Beyond all the drying designs associated with heat pump systems, some authors also consider solar systems with chemical heat pumps (CHP) and solar systems with dehumidification systems [13].
The chemical reactions in a CHP system are generally reversible, enabling the alteration of the temperature level of the thermal energy stored by chemical substances [175,176]. These reactions are crucial for absorbing and releasing heat. Typically, the main components include an evacuation system, a storage tank, a chemical heat pump and a drying chamber. CHP can be categorized into solid–gas [177] and liquid–gas.
A solid–gas chemical heat pump unit consists of a reactor or adsorber, an evaporator and a condenser. Liquid–gas systems have at least two reactors: endothermic and exothermic. The high storage capacity, low heat loss and long-term storage of reactants and products are the principal advantages of CHP [178].
Regarding dehumidification systems, in general, fresh products have high moisture contents. Using a desiccant material, such as silica, alumina, pillared clay, or zeolite [179,180,181], may consume low energy and produce dry air to improve drying performance. The pressure difference of generated water vapor, even at low temperatures, can improve driving force that is proportional to the evaporation rate. As a result, energy efficiency can be potentially improved while maintaining product quality [182].
Heat pump dryers come in different types and their performance varies depending on the type. The ability to control the temperature of the drying air and humidity while recovering energy from exhaust is one of the primary advantages of heat pump dryers; however, the environmental impacts is still not well known [183].

4.5. With Geothermal or Waste Waters

This kind of dryer uses solar radiation in combination with a low-potential energy source, such as geothermal or wastewater. The installation allows for the combination of conventional or nonconventional energy sources [184]. According to Ivanova and Andonov [185], it is possible to achieve continuous drying, even during the night, enabled by additional heating of the air during movement in the collector using this source of energy, in a clean and cost-effective mode, as renewable energies are used. The system includes a stainless-steel body, heat exchanger, piping, dehumidifier, blower and trays [186].
Based on the design, construction material used, energy backup systems and auxiliary heating units, several variants of solar dryers for drying foods have been described. These diverse configurations allow for customized solutions to suit specific drying requirements, optimizing energy efficiency and ensuring consistent drying performance across different applications. The integration of low-potential energy sources with solar radiation enhances the versatility and reliability of solar dryers, making them more sustainable and resilient in various operating conditions.
Several studies are being conducted to test different techniques for improving solar dryers, including the use of thermal storage materials, deep bed drying methods, enhanced solar collector designs and energy hybridization. As we can observe, there are a wide variety of solar dehydrators with different shapes and operating modes. The possibilities are so many that, in recent years, several authors have felt the need to write review articles on the subject (Table 6).

5. Advantages and Limiting Issues

The utilization of solar energy to dehydrate food remains attractive in terms of energy efficiency and the wide range of products that are suitable for the technique (Figure 9).
Commonly, it is correct to refer to the principal advantages and disadvantages as follows in Table 7.

6. Conclusions and Final Remarks

Nowadays, especially with awareness of the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development global goals, food drying is a vital process for food preservation. Generally, dehydration is a good solution, but concerns related to energy consumption and fossil fuels persist. The use of solar energy, once widely employed in the past, is regaining importance. This trend is evident in the number of studies considered in our review article. Performance, design parameters, location, atmospheric conditions and type of crop are principal factors taken into consideration when choosing the best mode for drying purposes. The articles aim to synthesize the findings from various studies, identify trends in the literature and provide insights and recommendations for further research and development in the field of solar drying.
Our paper reviewed the designs and mechanisms of various types of solar dryers, with a main focus on heat transfer, air movement and types of chambers. All the dryer layouts have advantages and disadvantages, but commonly, mixed-mode and hybrid types are more efficient in terms of time compared with direct and indirect modes. However, they are not entirely sustainable. Active circulation takes less time and yields better final products than open-air and natural circulation, although it represents limitations in terms of product quantity. For large-scale crop drying, the greenhouse type is the best method, but it requires more space.
The cited review articles are a valuable resource for researchers and practitioners interested in understanding the current state of knowledge and advancements in solar drying technologies and applications.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization: P.B.T. and L.F.; validation and review: L.F. and P.B.T.; original draft preparation: L.F. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Data Availability Statement

Data sharing is not applicable to this article.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Glossary

NomenclatureISD—indirect solar drying
LHS—latent heat storage
PW—petawattsLPG—Liquefied Petroleum Gas
UV—ultravioletMMTD—mix-mode type solar dryer
W—wattNCD—natural convection dryer
W/m2—watts per square meterNCDT—natural convection and direct type solar dryers
FAO—Food and Agriculture Organization
AbbreviationsCO2—carbon dioxide
OSD—open sun drying
CFD—computational fluid dynamicsDNI—direct normal irradiance
CHP—chemical heat pumpPCM—phase change material
DMTD—direct type solar dryerPV—photovoltaic
DSD—direct solar dryingPV/T—photovoltaic thermal
FCD—forced convection dryerSGD—solar greenhouse dryer
HAD—hot air dryerSHS—sensible heat storage
HGSD—hybrid greenhouse solar dryerSTD—solar tunnel dryer
HPD—heat pump integrated dryerSUS—steel use stainless
HSD—hybrid solar dryingTCES—thermos-chemical energy storage
IFCSD—indirect forced cabinet solar dryingTES—thermal energy storage

References

  1. Khan, I.; Han, L.; Khan, H.; Kim Oanh, L.T. Analyzing Renewable and Nonrenewable Energy Sources for Environmental Quality: Dynamic Investigation in Developing Countries. Math. Probl. Eng. 2021, 2021, 3399049. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Kalair, A.R.; Seyedmahmoudian, M.; Stojcevski, A.; Abas, N.; Khan, N. Waste to energy conversion for a sustainable future. Heliyon 2021, 7, e08155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Johnsson, F.; Kjärstad, J.; Rootzén, J. The threat to climate change mitigation posed by the abundance of fossil fuels. Clim. Policy 2019, 19, 258–274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Holechek, J.L.; Geli, H.M.E.; Sawalhah, M.N.; Valdez, R. A global assessment: Can renewable energy replace fossil fuels by 2050? Sustainability 2022, 14, 4792. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Rhodes, C.J. Solar energy: Principles and possibilities. Sci. Prog. 2010, 93, 37–112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Yang, D.; Wang, W.; Gueymard, C.A.; Hong, T.; Kleissl, J.; Huang, J.; Perez, M.J.; Perez, R.; Bright, J.M.; Xia, X.A.; et al. A review of solar forecasting, its dependence on atmospheric sciences and implications for grid integration: Towards carbon neutrality. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2022, 161, 112348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Fernandes, L.; Fernandes, J.R.; Tavares, P.B. Design of a Friendly Solar Food Dryer for Domestic Over-Production. Solar 2022, 2, 495–508. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Ekici, C. Total Global Solar Radiation Estimation Models and Applications: A review. Int. J. Innov. Technol. Interdiscip. 2019, 2, 236–252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Mustayen, A.G.M.B.; Mekhilef, S.; Saidur, R. Performance study of different solar dryers: A review. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2014, 34, 463–470. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Ismail, M.I.; Yunus, N.A.; Hashim, H. Integration of solar heating systems for low-temperature heat demand in food processing industry—A review. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2021, 147, 111192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Khan, M.I.H.; Batuwatta-Gamage, C.P.; Karim, M.A.; Gu, Y. Fundamental Understanding of Heat and Mass Transfer Processes for Physics-Informed Machine Learning-Based Drying Modelling. Energies 2022, 15, 9347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Sharma, A.; Chen, C.R.; Vu Lan, N. Solar-energy drying systems: A review. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2009, 13, 1185–1210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Tiwari, A. A Review on Solar Drying of Agricultural Produce. J. Food Process Technol. 2016, 7, 1000623. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Ortiz-Rodríguez, N.M.; Condorí, M.; Durán, G.; García-Valladares, O. Solar drying Technologies: A review and future research directions with a focus on agroindustrial applications in medium and large scale. Appl. Therm. Eng. 2022, 215, 118993. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. El Hage, H.; Herez, A.; Ramadan, M.; Bazzi, H.; Khaled, M. An investigation on solar drying: A review with economic and environmental assessment. Energy 2018, 157, 815–829. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Rajkumar, P.; Kulanthaisami, S.; Raghavan, G.S.V.; Gariépy, Y.; Orsat, V. Drying kinetics of tomato slices in vacuum assisted solar and open sun drying methods. Dry. Technol. 2007, 25, 1349–1357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Singh, P.; Vyas, S.; Yadav, A. Experimental comparison of open sun drying and solar drying based on evacuated tube collector. Int. J. Sustain. Energy 2019, 38, 348–367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. John, M.K.; Bandaru, R.; Muraleedharan, C. Experimental analysis of wavy mesh assisted solar drying system with a survey of common drying technologies employed by farmers. Sustain. Energy Technol. Assess. 2023, 56, 103049. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Singh Chauhan, P.; Kumar, A.; Tekasakul, P. Applications of software in solar drying systems: A review. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2015, 51, 1326–1337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Chaudhari, A.D.; Salve, S.P. A review of solar dryer technologies. Int. J. Res. Advent. Technol. 2014, 2, 218–232. [Google Scholar]
  21. Singh, S.; Kumar, S. Comparative Thermal Performance Study of Indirect and Mixed-mode Solar Dryers. Int. J. Sustain. Energy Dev. 2012, 1, 6–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Tiwari, S.; Tiwari, G.N.; Al-Helal, I.M. Development and recent trends in greenhouse dryer: A review. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2016, 65, 1048–1064. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Singh, S.; Kumar, S. Development of convective heat transfer correlations for common designs of solar dryer. Energy Convers. Manag. 2012, 64, 403–414. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Jain, D.; Tewari, P. Performance of indirect through pass natural convective solar crop dryer with phase change thermal energy storage. Renew. Energy 2015, 80, 244–250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Shalaby, S.M.; Bek, M.A.; El-Sebaii, A.A. Solar dryers with PCM as energy storage medium: A review. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2014, 33, 110–116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Singh, S.; Kumar, S. Testing method for thermal performance based rating of various solar dryer designs. Sol. Energy 2012, 86, 87–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Almuhanna, E.A. Utilization of a Solar Greenhouse as a Solar Dryer for Drying Dates under the Climatic Conditions of the Eastern Province of Saudi Arabia. J. Agric. Sci. 2011, 4, 237–246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Constantinou, S.; Gómez-Caravaca, A.M.; Goulas, V.; Segura-Carretero, A.; Koundouras, S.; Manganaris, G.A. The impact of postharvest dehydration methods on qualitative attributes and chemical composition of ‘Xynisteri’ grape (Vitis vinifera) must. Postharvest Biol. Technol. 2018, 135, 114–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Kumar, M.; Sansaniwal, S.K.; Khatak, P. Progress in solar dryers for drying various commodities. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2016, 55, 346–360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Jamroen, C.; Komkum, P.; Yoopum, P.; Pinsakol, S.; Kerdnoan, K. Improvement of an open sun drying system for dried banana product using solar tracking system: A case study in Thailand. Int. J. Green. Energy. 2022, 19, 1085–1097. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Khadraoui, A.E.; Hamdi, I.; Kooli, S.; Guizani, A. Drying of red pepper slices in a solar greenhouse dryer and under open sun: Experimental and mathematical investigations. Innov. Food Sci. Emerg. Technol. 2019, 52, 262–270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Adenitan, A.A.; Awoyale, W.; Akinwande, B.A.; Busie, M.D.; Michael, S. Mycotoxin profiles of solar tent-dried and open sun-dried plantain chips. Food Control 2021, 119, 107467. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Mehta, D.; Sharma, A.; Yadav, N.; Alam, T.; Bhardwaj, A. Comparative sudies on dehydration of mint (Mentha arvensis) by open sun drying, solar drying and hot air cabinet drying. Asian J. Dairy. Food Res. 2017, 36, 2–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Essalhi, H.; Benchrifa, M.; Tadili, R.; Bargach, M.N. Experimental and theoretical analysis of drying grapes under an indirect solar dryer and in open sun. Innov. Food Sci. Emerg. Technol. 2018, 49, 58–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Pochont, N.R.; Mohammad, M.N.; Pradeep, B.T.; Vijaya Kumar, P. A comparative study of drying kinetics and quality of Indian red chilli in solar hybrid greenhouse drying and open sun drying. Mater. Today Proc. 2020, 21, 286–290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Narmilan, A.; Niroash, G.; Mowjood, M.I.M.; Akram, A.T.A. Effect of Pads and Thickness of Paddy on Moisture Removal under Sun Drying. Agric. Sci. Dig. 2021, 41, 572–577. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Kalroo, M.W. Research Article Comparison Between Solar Tunnel, Solar-Cum Gas Dryer and Open Sun Drying Methods for Drying Red Chilies. Pak. J. Agric. Res. 2022, 36, 63. [Google Scholar]
  38. Amoah, R.E.; Kalakandan, S.; Wireko-Manu, F.D.; Oduro, I.; Saalia, F.K.; Owusu, E. The effect of vinegar and drying (Solar and Open Sun) on the microbiological quality of ginger (ZINGIBER OFFICINALE ROSCOE) rhizomes. Food Sci. Nutr. 2020, 8, 6112–6119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Şahin, U.; Öztürk, H.K. Comparison between Artificial Neural Network model and mathematical models for drying kinetics of osmotically dehydrated and fresh figs under open sun drying. J. Food Process Eng. 2018, 41, e12804. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Solomon, G.R.; Ilayaperumal, K.; Balaji, R.; Chellappa, B. Experimental analysis of agricultural solar dryer. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series; IOP Publishing: Bristol, UK, 2021; Volume 2054. [Google Scholar]
  41. Castillo Téllez, M.; Pilatowsky Figueroa, I.; Castillo Téllez, B.; López Vidaña, E.C.; López Ortiz, A. Solar drying of Stevia (Rebaudiana Bertoni) leaves using direct and indirect technologies. Sol. Energy 2018, 159, 898–907. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Kabeel, A.E.; Dharmadurai, P.D.L.; Vasanthaseelan, S.; Sathyamurthy, R.; Ramani, B.; Manokar, A.M.; Chamkha, A. Experimental studies on natural convection open and closed solar drying using external reflector. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2022, 29, 1391–1400. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Sharma, S.; Dhalsamant, K.; Tripathy, P.P.; Manepally, R.K. Quality analysis and drying characteristics of turmeric (Curcuma longa L.) dried by hot air and direct solar dryers. Lwt 2021, 138, 110687. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Camaño, J.A.; Rivera, A.M.; Zapata, J.E. Efecto del espesor de película y de la ubicación de la muestra en un secador solar directo, sobre la cinética de secado de ensilado de vísceras de tilapia roja (Oreochromis sp). Inf. Tecnológica 2020, 31, 53–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Dissa, A.O.; Bathiebo, D.J.; Desmorieux, H.; Coulibaly, O.; Koulidiati, J. Experimental characterisation and modelling of thin layer direct solar drying of Amelie and Brooks mangoes. Energy 2011, 36, 2517–2527. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Sharma, S.; Dhalsamant, K.; Tripathy, P.P. Application of computer vision technique for physical quality monitoring of turmeric slices during direct solar drying. J. Food Meas. Charact. 2019, 13, 545–558. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Elangovan, E.; Natarajan, S.K. Effect of pretreatments on drying of red dacca in a single slope solar dryer. J. Food Process Eng. 2021, 44, e13823. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Souto Ribeiro, W.; Sant’Ana Silva, A.; Ferreira da Silva, Á.G.; Marinho do Nascimento, A.; Rocha Limão, M.A.; Bezerra da Costa, F.; de Souza, P.A.; de Melo Queiroz, A.J.; Soares da Silva, O.; Oliveira Galdino, P.; et al. Handmade solar dryer: An environmentally and economically viable alternative for small and medium producers. Sci. Rep. 2021, 11, 17177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Kumar, A.; Singh, K.U.; Singh, M.K.; Kushwaha, A.K.S.; Kumar, A.; Mahato, S. Retracted: Design and Fabrication of Solar Dryer System for Food Preservation of Vegetables or Fruit". J. Food Qual. 2023, 2022, 9760148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Mdziniso, P.; Hinds, M.J.; Bellmer, D.D.; Brown, B.; Payton, M.E. Physical quality and carotene content of solar-dried green leafy and yellow succulent vegetables. Plant Foods Hum. Nutr. 2006, 61, 13–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Guine, R.P.F.; Ferreira, D.M.S.; Barroca, M.J.; Goncalves, F.M. Study of the solar drying of pears. Int. J. Fruit. Sci. 2007, 7, 101–118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Madhlopa, A.; Jones, S.A.; Kalenga Saka, J.D. A solar air heater with composite-absorber systems for food dehydration. Renew. Energy 2002, 27, 27–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Krabch, H.; Tadili, R.; idrissi, A.; Bargach, M. Indirect solar dryer with a single compartment for food drying. Appl. Dry. Pear Sol. Energy 2022, 240, 131–139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Noori, A.W.; Royen, M.J.; Haydary, J. Thin-layer mathematical modeling of apple slices drying, under open sun and cabinet solar dryer. Int. J. Innov. Res. Sci. Stud. 2021, 4, 43–52. [Google Scholar]
  55. Lingayat, A.; Chandramohan, V.P.; Raju, V.R.K.; Suresh, S. Drying kinetics of tomato (Solanum lycopersicum) and Brinjal (Solanum melongena) using an indirect type solar dryer and performance parameters of dryer. Heat. Mass. Transf. 2021, 57, 853–872. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Gilago, M.C.; Mugi, V.R.; Velayudhan Parvathy, C. Analysis and comparison of the performance parameters of passive and active indirect solar dryers with heat storage facility while drying carrot. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2023, 30, 56246–56258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Musembi, M.N.; Kiptoo, K.S.; Yuichi, N. Design and Analysis of Solar Dryer for Mid-Latitude Region. Energy Procedia 2016, 100, 98–110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Noutfia, Y.; Benali, A.; Alem, C.; Zegzouti, Y.F. Design of a solar dryer for small-farm level use and studying fig quality. Acta Sci. Pol. Technol. Aliment. 2018, 17, 359–365. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. Sreekumar, A.; Manikantan, P.E.; Vijayakumar, K.P. Performance of indirect solar cabinet dryer. Energy Convers. Manag. 2008, 49, 1388–1395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Sámano Delgado, E.; Martinez-Flores, H.E.; Garnica-Romo, M.G.; Aranda-Sanchez, J.I.; Sosa-Aguirre, C.R.; de Jesús Cortés-penagos, C.; Fernández-Muñoz, J.L. Optimization of solar dryer for the dehydration of fruits and vegetables. J. Food Process Preserv. 2013, 37, 489–495. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Iglesias Díaz, R.; José Gómez, R.A.; Lastres Danguillecourt, O.; López de Paz, P.; Farrera Vázquez, N.; Ibáñez Duharte, G.R. Diseño, construcción y evaluación de un secador solar para mango Ataulfo. Rev. Mex. Cienc. Agrícolas 2017, 8, 1719–1732. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Elzubeir, A.O. Solar Dehydration of Sliced Onion. Int. J. Veg. Sci. 2014, 20, 264–269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Hussein, J.B.; Usman, M.A.; Filli, K.B. Effect of Hybrid Solar Drying Method on the Functional and Sensory Properties of Tomato. Am. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2016, 4, 141–148. [Google Scholar]
  64. Suherman, S.; Hadiyanto, H.; Susanto, E.E.; Utami, I.A.P.; Ningrum, T. Hybrid solar dryer for sugar-palm vermicelli drying. J. Food Process Eng. 2020, 43, e13471. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Boughali, S.; Benmoussa, H.; Bouchekima, B.; Mennouche, D.; Bouguettaia, H.; Bechki, D. Crop drying by indirect active hybrid solar—Electrical dryer in the eastern Algerian Septentrional Sahara. Sol. Energy 2009, 83, 2223–2232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Reyes, A.; Mahn, A.; Cubillos, F.; Huenulaf, P. Mushroom dehydration in a hybrid-solar dryer. Energy Convers. Manag. 2013, 70, 31–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Suherman, S.; Hadiyanto, H.; Susanto, E.E.; Rahmatullah, S.A.; Pratama, A.R. Towards an optimal hybrid solar method for lime-drying behavior. Heliyon 2020, 6, e05356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  68. Mohammed, S.; Fatumah, N.; Shadia, N. Drying performance and economic analysis of novel hybrid passive-mode and active-mode solar dryers for drying fruits in East Africa. J. Stored Prod. Res. 2020, 88, 101634. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Sharma, M.; Atheaya, D.; Kumar, A. Exergy, drying kinetics and performance assessment of Solanum lycopersicum (tomatoes) drying in an indirect type domestic hybrid solar dryer (ITDHSD) system. J. Food Process Preserv. 2022, 46, e16988. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Reza Rouzegar, M.; Hossein Abbaspour-Fard, M.; Hedayatizadeh, M. Design, thermal simulation and experimental study of a hybrid solar dryer with heat storage capability. Sol. Energy 2023, 258, 232–243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Nollens, A.F.B.; Rojos, E.O.; Fariello, M.O. Use of a hybrid solar oven for houses in dry climates: An experimental study of thermal performance. Int. J. Renew. Energy Res. 2012, 2, 767–772. [Google Scholar]
  72. Hammou, Z.A.; Lacroix, M. A hybrid thermal energy storage system for managing simultaneously solar and electric energy. Energy Convers. Manag. 2006, 47, 273–288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Barnwal, P.; Tiwari, G.N. Grape drying by using hybrid photovoltaic-thermal (PV/T) greenhouse dryer: An experimental study. Sol. Energy 2008, 82, 1131–1144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Hussein, J.; Hassan, M.; Kareem, S.; Filli, K. Design, Construction and Testing of a Hybrid Photovoltaic (PV) Solar Dryer. Int. J. Eng. Res. Sci. 2017, 3, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Rizal, T.A.; Muhammad, Z. Fabrication and testing of hybrid solar-biomass dryer for drying fish. Case Stud. Therm. Eng. 2018, 12, 489–496. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Chauhan, D.; Agrawal, S. Energy and Exergy Based Analysis of Hybrid Solar Dryer. Contemp. Eng. Sci. 2016, 7, 2347–2358. [Google Scholar]
  77. Delfiya, A.; Mohapatra, D.; Kotwaliwale, N.; Mishra, A.K. Effect of microwave blanching and brine solution pretreatment on the quality of carrots dried in solar-biomass hybrid dryer. J. Food Process Preserv. 2018, 42, e13510. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. El Khadraoui, A.; Bouadila, S.; Kooli, S.; Farhat, A.; Guizani, A. Thermal behavior of indirect solar dryer: Nocturnal usage of solar air collector with PCM. J. Clean. Prod. 2017, 148, 37–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Parihar, J.S.; Kumar, S.; Kumar, L.; Kumar, Y.; Ghritlahre, H.K.; Verma, M.; Gupta, A.K.; Agrawal, S.; Shekhar, S. Development of novel cabinet solar dryer using UV sheet and its performance evaluation: An experimental study. Sol. Energy 2022, 239, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Chavan, A.; Vitankar, V.; Mujumdar, A.; Thorat, B. Natural convection and direct type (NCDT) solar dryers: A review. Dry. Technol. 2021, 39, 1969–1990. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Phadke, P.; Walke, P. Direct Type Natural Convection Solar Dryer: A Review. Int. J. Adv. Res. Sci. Eng. 2015, 4, 256–262. [Google Scholar]
  82. Afriyie, J.K.; Rajakaruna, H.; Nazha, M.A.A.; Forson, F.K. Mathematical modelling and validation of the drying process in a Chimney-Dependent Solar Crop Dryer. Energy Convers. Manag. 2013, 67, 103–116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Ghaffari, A.; Mehdipour, R. Modeling and Improving the Performance of Cabinet Solar Dryer Using Computational Fluid Dynamics. Int. J. Food Eng. 2015, 11, 157–172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Anwar, S.I.; Tiwari, G.N. Thermal modelling of two-tray reverse absorber cabinet dryer with glass cover. Int. J. Ambient Energy 2002, 23, 69–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Prakash, O.; Kumar, A. Solar greenhouse drying: A review. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2014, 29, 905–910. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Anil, K.; Tiwari, G.N.; Subodh, K.; Mukesh, P. Role of Greenhouse Technology in Agricultural Engineering. Int. J. Agric. Res. 2010, 5, 779–787. [Google Scholar]
  87. An, C.H.; Ri, H.J.; Han, T.U.; Kim, S.I.; Ju, U.S. Feasibility of winter cultivation of fruit vegetables in a solar greenhouse in temperate zone; experimental and numerical study. Sol. Energy 2022, 233, 18–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Prakash, O.; Laguri, V.; Pandey, A.; Kumar, A.; Kumar, A. Review on various modelling techniques for the solar dryers. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2016, 62, 396–417. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Lingayat, A.B.; Chandramohan, V.P.; Raju, V.R.K.; Meda, V. A review on indirect type solar dryers for agricultural crops—Dryer setup, its performance, energy storage and important highlights. Appl. Energy 2020, 258, 114005. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Ekechukwu, O.V.; Norton, B. Review of solar-energy drying systems II: An overview of solar drying technology. Energy Convers. Manag. 1999, 40, 615–655. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Sileshi, S.T.; Hassen, A.A.; Adem, K.D. Simulation of mixed-mode solar dryer with vertical air distribution channel. Heliyon 2022, 8, e11898. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Shimpy; Kumar, M.; Kumar, A. Designs, Performance and Economic Feasibility of Domestic Solar Dryers. Food Eng. Rev. 2023, 15, 156–186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Vigneshwaran, T.; Aravindh, A.; Jayaraj, R.; Balachandar, B.; Arumugam, P. Design of Mixed Mode Solar Dryer. J. Eng. Res. Technol. 2015, 3, 22–24. [Google Scholar]
  94. Missana, W.P.; Mashingo, P.P. Thermal performance assessment of a passive mixed-mode solar dryer. Res. Sq. 2022, 1–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Balasuadhakar, A. A review of construction, material and performance in mixed mode passive solar dryers. Mater. Today Proc. 2020, 46, 4165–4168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Poonia, S.; Singh, A.K.; Jain, D. Solar drying—A novel technology for arid food processing and preservation. Just Agric. 2021, 2, 2582–8223. [Google Scholar]
  97. Colin, S. International Journal of Heat and Technology: Foreword. Int. J. Heat. Technol. 2008, 26, 107. [Google Scholar]
  98. Bala, B.K.; Debnath, N. Solar Drying Technology: Potentials and Developments. J. Fundam. Renew. Energy Appl. 2012, 2, 1–5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Dejchanchaiwong, R.; Arkasuwan, A.; Kumar, A.; Tekasakul, P. Mathematical modeling and performance investigation of mixed-mode and indirect solar dryers for natural rubber sheet drying. Energy Sustain. Dev. 2016, 34, 44–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Harini, S.; Kavya, V.S.; Ramana, A.S. Recent Developments in Design and Operations of Solar dryer. In IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science; IOP Publishing: Bristol, UK, 2022; Volume 1100. [Google Scholar]
  101. Singh, S.; Kumar, S. Solar drying for different test conditions: Proposed framework for estimation of specific energy consumption and CO2 emissions mitigation. Energy 2013, 51, 27–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Kadam, D.M.; Samuel, D.V.K.; Parsad, R. Optimisation of pre-treatments of solar dehydrated cauliflower. J. Food Eng. 2006, 77, 659–664. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Gulcimen, F.; Karakaya, H.; Durmus, A. Drying of sweet basil with solar air collectors. Renew. Energy 2016, 93, 77–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Ayua, E.; Mugalavai, V.; Simon, J.; Weller, S.; Obura, P.; Nyabinda, N. Comparison of a mixed modes solar dryer to a direct mode solar dryer for African indigenous vegetable and chili processing. J. Food Process Preserv. 2017, 41, e13216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Badaoui, O.; Hanini, S.; Djebli, A.; Haddad, B.; Benhamou, A. Experimental and modelling study of tomato pomace waste drying in a new solar greenhouse: Evaluation of new drying models. Renew. Energy 2019, 133, 144–155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Stiling, J.; Li, S.; Stroeve, P.; Thompson, J.; Mjawa, B.; Kornbluth, K.; Barrett, D.M. Performance evaluation of an enhanced fruit solar dryer using concentrating panels. Energy Sustain. Dev. 2012, 16, 224–230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Mehta, P.; Samaddar, S.; Patel, P.; Markam, B.; Maiti, S. Design and performance analysis of a mixed mode tent-type solar dryer for fish-drying in coastal areas. Sol. Energy 2018, 170, 671–681. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Asnaz, M.S.K.; Dolcek, A.O. Comparative performance study of different types of solar dryers towards sustainable agriculture. Energy Rep. 2021, 7, 6107–6118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Babar, O.A.; Tarafdar, A.; Malakar, S.; Arora, V.K.; Nema, P.K. Design and performance evaluation of a passive flat plate collector solar dryer for agricultural products. J. Food Process Eng. 2020, 43, e13484. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Mokhtarian, M.; Tavakolipour, H.; Kalbasi Ashtari, A. Effects of solar drying along with air recycling system on physicochemical and sensory properties of dehydrated pistachio nuts. LWT 2017, 75, 202–209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Noori, A.W.; Royen, M.J.; Haydary, J. Effect of ambient parameters change on mint leaves solar drying. Acta Chim. Slovaca 2021, 14, 14–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Jangsawang, W. Meat Products Drying with a Compact Solar Cabinet Dryer. Energy Procedia 2017, 138, 1048–1054. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  113. Matavel, C.E.; Hoffmann, H.; Rybak, C.; Hafner, J.M.; Salavessa, J.; Eshetu, S.B.; Sieber, S. Experimental evaluation of a passive indirect solar dryer for agricultural products in Central Mozambique. J. Food Process Preserv. 2021, 45, e15975. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  114. Dissa, A.O.; Bathiebo, J.; Kam, S.; Savadogo, P.W.; Desmorieux, H.; Koulidiati, J. Modelling and experimental validation of thin layer indirect solar drying of mango slices. Renew. Energy 2009, 34, 1000–1008. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  115. Eltawil, M.A.; Azam, M.M.; Alghannam, A.O. Solar PV powered mixed-mode tunnel dryer for drying potato chips. Renew. Energy 2018, 116, 594–605. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  116. Afzal, A.; Iqbal, T.; Ikram, K.; Anjum, M.N.; Umair, M.; Azam, M.; Akram, S.; Hussain, F.; ul Zaman, M.A.; Ali, A.; et al. Development of a hybrid mixed-mode solar dryer for product drying. Heliyon 2023, 9, e14144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  117. Sileshi, S.T.; Hassen, A.A.; Adem, K.D. Drying kinetics of dried injera (dirkosh) using a mixed-mode solar dryer. Cogent Eng. 2021, 8, 1956870. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Nayanita, K.; Rani Shaik, S.; Muthukumar, P. Comparative study of Mixed-Mode Type and Direct Mode Type Solar Dryers using Life Cycle Assessment. Sustain. Energy Technol. Assess. 2022, 53, 102680. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  119. Mustayen, A.G.M.B.; Rahman, M.M.; Mekhilef, S.; Saidur, R. Performance evaluation of a solar powered air dryer for white oyster mushroom drying. Int. J. Green. Energy 2015, 12, 1113–1121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  120. Forson, F.K.; Nazha, M.A.A.; Akuffo, F.O.; Rajakaruna, H. Design of mixed-mode natural convection solar crop dryers: Application of principles and rules of thumb. Renew. Energy 2007, 32, 2306–2319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. El-Sebaii, A.A.; Shalaby, S.M. Experimental investigation of an indirect-mode forced convection solar dryer for drying thymus and mint. Energy Convers. Manag. 2013, 74, 109–116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  122. Kamarulzaman, A.; Hasanuzzaman, M.; Rahim, N.A. Global advancement of solar drying technologies and its future prospects: A review. Sol. Energy 2021, 221, 559–582. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  123. Saxena, G.; Gaur, M.K.; Kushwah, A. Performance Analysis and ANN Modelling of Apple Drying in ETSC-Assisted Hybrid. In Artificial Intelligence and Sustainable Computing: Proceedings of ICSISCET 2020; Springer: Singapore, 2022; pp. 275–294. [Google Scholar]
  124. Jain, D. Modeling the system performance of multi-tray crop drying using an inclined multi-pass solar air heater with in-built thermal storage. J. Food Eng. 2005, 71, 44–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  125. Kant, K.; Shukla, A.; Sharma, A.; Kumar, A.; Jain, A. Thermal energy storage based solar drying systems: A review. Innov. Food Sci. Emerg. Technol. 2016, 34, 86–99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  126. Bareen, A.; Dash, S.; Kalita, P.; Dash, K.K. Experimental investigation of an indirect solar dryer with PCM-integrated solar collector as a thermal energy storage medium. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  127. Barbosa, E.G.; de Araujo, M.E.V.; de Oliveira, A.C.L.; Martins, M.A. Thermal energy storage systems applied to solar dryers: Classification, performance and numerical modeling: An updated review. Case Stud. Therm. Eng. 2023, 45, 102986. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  128. Srinivasan, G.; Rabha, D.K.; Muthukumar, P. A review on solar dryers integrated with thermal energy storage units for drying agricultural and food products. Sol. Energy 2021, 229, 22–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  129. Suresh, B.V.; Shireesha, Y.; Kishore, T.S.; Dwivedi, G.; Haghighi, A.T.; Patro, E.R. Natural energy materials and storage systems for solar dryers: State of the art. Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells 2023, 255, 112276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  130. Ekka, J.P.; Kumar, D. A review of industrial food processing using solar dryers with heat storage systems. J. Stored Prod. Res. 2023, 101, 102090. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  131. Bal, L.M.; Satya, S.; Naik, S.N. Solar dryer with thermal energy storage systems for drying agricultural food products: A review. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2010, 14, 2298–2314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  132. Atalay, H. Assessment of energy and cost analysis of packed bed and phase change material thermal energy storage systems for the solar energy-assisted drying process. Sol. Energy 2020, 198, 124–138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  133. Le, T.S.; Le, T.H.; Pham, M.T. A review of the indirect solar dryer with sensible heat storage mediums. J. Mech. Eng. Res. Dev. 2021, 44, 131–140. [Google Scholar]
  134. Dincer, I.; Rosen, M.A. Thermal Energy Storage Systems and Applications, 2nd ed.; Wiley: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2021; Available online: https://www.mendeley.com/catalogue/01fdef10-9cbe-348d-b047-c1fa4704b3eb/?utm_source=desktop&utm_medium=1.19.8&utm_campaign=open_catalog&userDocumentId=%7Bfeb3922d-e583-4d27-af02-eb86801f2975%7D (accessed on 10 May 2023).
  135. Ebrahimi, H.; Samimi Akhijahani, H.; Salami, P. Improving the thermal efficiency of a solar dryer using phase change materials at different position in the collector. Sol. Energy 2021, 220, 535–551. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  136. Zhang, H.; Smith, J.D. Investigating influences of geometric factors on a solar thermochemical reactor for two-step carbon dioxide splitting via CFD models. Sol. Energy 2019, 188, 935–950. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  137. Carrillo, A.J.; González-Aguilar, J.; Romero, M.; Coronado, J.M. Solar Energy on Demand: A Review on High Temperature Thermochemical Heat Storage Systems and Materials. Chem. Rev. 2019, 119, 4777–4816. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  138. Garofalo, L.; Vitiello, F.V.; Montagnaro, F.; Bürgmayr, H.; Winter, F. Salt Hydrates for Thermochemical Storage of Solar Energy: Modeling the Case Study of Calcium Oxalate Monohydrate Dehydration/Rehydration under Suspension Reactor Conditions. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2021, 60, 11357–11372. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  139. Amer, B.; Gottschalk, K. Drying of Chamomile Using a Hybrid Solar Dryer. CIGR-World Congr. 2012. Available online: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/256457594_Drying_of_Chamomile_Using_a_Hybrid_Solar_Dryer (accessed on 22 April 2023).
  140. Matouk, A.; EL-Kholy, M.; Tharwat, A.; Elfar, S.; Shehata, E. Drying of Onion Slices Using Hybrid Solar Dryer. J. Soil. Sci. Agric. Eng. 2021, 12, 491–498. [Google Scholar]
  141. Hossain, M.A.; Amer, B.M.A.; Gottschalk, K. Hybrid solar dryer for quality dried tomato. Dry. Technol. 2008, 26, 1591–1601. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  142. Rodrigues, L.J.; Basso, D.M. Hybrid system simulation to supply heated air to a solar food dryer. Eng. Agric. 2020, 40, 154–161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  143. Ferreira, A.G.; Charbel, A.L.T.; Pires, R.L.; Silva, J.G.; Maia, C.B. Experimental Analysis of a Hybrid Dryer. Rev. Eng. Térmica. 2007, 6, 3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  144. Suherman, S.; Rizki, H.; Rauf, N.; Susanto, E.E. Performance study of hybrid solar dryer with auxiliary heater for seaweed drying. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series; IOP Publishing: Bristol, UK, 2019; Volume 1295. [Google Scholar]
  145. Nukulwar, M.R.; Tungikar, V.B. Recent development of the solar dryer integrated with thermal energy storage and auxiliary units. Therm. Sci. Eng. Prog. 2022, 29, 101192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  146. Srimanickam, B.; Kumar, S. Drying investigation of coriander seeds in a photovoltaic thermal collector with solar dryer. J. Therm. Eng. 2023, 9, 659–668. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  147. Garg, H.P.; Kumar, R. Studies on semi-cylindrical solar tunnel dryers: Thermal performance of collector. Appl. Therm. Eng. 2000, 20, 115–131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  148. Condorí, M.; Echazú, R.; Saravia, L. Solar drying of sweet pepper and garlic using the tunnel greenhouse drier. Renew. Energy 2001, 22, 447–460. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  149. Farhat, A.; Kooli, S.; Kerkeni, C.; Maalej, M.; Fadhel, A.; Belghith, A. Validation of a pepper drying model in a polyethylene tunnel greenhouse. Int. J. Therm. Sci. 2004, 43, 53–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  150. Janjai, S.; Khamvongsa, V.; Bala, B.K. Development, designand performance of a PV-Ventilated greenhouse dryer. Int. Energy J. 2007, 8, 249–258. [Google Scholar]
  151. Janjai, S.; Lamlert, N.; Intawee, P.; Mahayothee, B.; Bala, B.K.; Nagle, M.; Müller, J. Experimental and simulated performance of a PV-ventilated solar greenhouse dryer for drying of peeled longan and banana. Sol. Energy 2009, 83, 1550–1565. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  152. Patil, R.; Gawande, R. A review on solar tunnel greenhouse drying system. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2016, 56, 196–214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  153. Punlek, C.; Pairintra, R.; Chindaraksa, S.; Maneewan, S. Simulation design and evaluation of hybrid PV/T assisted desiccant integrated HA-IR drying system (HPIRD). Food Bioprod. Process. 2009, 87, 77–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  154. Daghigh, R.; Shahidian, R.; Oramipoor, H. A multistate investigation of a solar dryer coupled with photovoltaic thermal collector and evacuated tube collector. Sol. Energy 2020, 199, 694–703. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  155. Fterich, M.; Chouikhi, H.; Bentaher, H.; Maalej, A. Experimental parametric study of a mixed-mode forced convection solar dryer equipped with a PV/T air collector. Sol. Energy 2018, 171, 751–760. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  156. Kong, D.; Wang, Y.; Li, M.; Keovisar, V.; Huang, M.; Yu, Q. Experimental study of solar photovoltaic/thermal (PV/T) air collector drying performance. Sol. Energy 2020, 208, 978–989. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  157. Ozsolak, F.; Milos, P.M. A Review of Photovoltaic Thermal (PVT) Technology for Residential Applications. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2010, 12, 87–98. Available online: http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=3031867&tool=pmcentrez&rendertype=abstract%5Cn (accessed on 18 June 2023). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  158. Shahsavar, A.; Ameri, M. Experimental investigation and modeling of a direct-coupled PV/T air collector. Sol. Energy 2010, 84, 1938–1958. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  159. Ahn, J.G.; Kim, J.H.; Kim, J.T. A study on experimental performance of air-type PV/T collector with HRV. Energy Procedia 2015, 78, 3007–3012. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  160. Zhang, X.; Zhao, X.; Smith, S.; Xu, J.; Yu, X. Review of R&D progress and practical application of the solar photovoltaic/thermal (PV/T) technologies. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2012, 16, 599–617. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  161. Goud, M.; Reddy, M.V.V.; Chandramohan, V.P.; Suresh, S. A novel indirect solar dryer with inlet fans powered by solar PV panels: Drying kinetics of Capsicum Annum and Abelmoschus esculentus with dryer performance. Sol. Energy 2019, 194, 871–885. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  162. Assadeg, J.; Alwaeli, A.H.A.; Sopian, K.; Moria, H.; Hamid, A.S.A.; Fudholi, A. Solar assisted heat pump system for high quality drying applications: A critical review. Int. J. Renew. Energy Res. 2020, 10, 303–316. [Google Scholar]
  163. Wang, Y.; Li, M.; Qiu, Y.; Yu, Q.; Luo, X.; Li, G.; Ma, X. Performance analysis of a secondary heat recovery solar-assisted heat pump drying system for mango. Energy Explor. Exploit. 2019, 37, 1377–1387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  164. Fayose, F.; Huan, Z. Heat pump drying of fruits and vegetables: Principles and potentials for Sub-Saharan Africa. Int. J. Food Sci. 2016, 2016, 9673029. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  165. Hasan Ismaeel, H.; Yumrutaş, R. Investigation of a solar assisted heat pump wheat drying system with underground thermal energy storage tank. Sol. Energy 2020, 199, 538–551. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  166. Cervantes, J.G.; Torres-Reyes, E. Experiments on a solar-assisted heat pump and an exergy analysis of the system. Appl. Therm. Eng. 2002, 22, 1289–1297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  167. Yahya, M.; Fahmi, H.; Fudholi, A.; Sopian, K. Performance and economic analyses on solar-assisted heat pump fluidised bed dryer integrated with biomass furnace for rice drying. Sol. Energy 2018, 174, 1058–1067. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  168. Şevik, S. Experimental investigation of a new design solar-heat pump dryer under the different climatic conditions and drying behavior of selected products. Sol. Energy. 2014, 105, 190–205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  169. Chapchaimoh, K.; Poomsa-Ad, N.; Wiset, L.; Morris, J. Thermal characteristics of heat pump dryer for ginger drying. Appl. Therm. Eng. 2016, 95, 491–498. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  170. Aktas, T.; Ulger, P.; Daglioglu, F.; Hasturk, F. Changes of nutritional and physical quality characteristics during storage of osmotic pretreated apple before hot air drying and sensory evaluation. J. Food Qual. 2013, 36, 411–425. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  171. Duan, Q.; Wang, D.; Li, X.; Li, Y.; Zhang, S. Thermal characteristics of a novel enclosed cascade-like heat pump dryer used in a tunnel type drying system. Appl. Therm. Eng. 2019, 155, 206–216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  172. Ceylan, I.; Gürel, A.E. Solar-assisted fluidized bed dryer integrated with a heat pump for mint leaves. Appl. Therm. Eng. 2016, 106, 899–905. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  173. Li, Y.; Li, H.F.; Dai, Y.J.; Gao, S.F.; Wei, L.; Li, Z.L.; Odinez, I.G.; Wang, R.Z. Experimental investigation on a solar assisted heat pump in-store drying system. Appl. Therm. Eng. 2011, 31, 1718–1724. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  174. Kang, H.; Zhang, G.; Mu, G.; Zhao, C.; Huang, H.; Kang, C.; Li, X.; Zhang, Q. Design of a Greenhouse Solar-Assisted Heat Pump Dryer for Kelp (Laminaria japonica): System Performance and Drying Kinetics. Foods 2022, 11, 3509. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  175. Kawasaki, H.; Watanabe, T.; Kanzawa, A. Proposal of a chemical heat pump with paraldehyde depolymerization for cooling system. Appl. Therm. Eng. 1999, 19, 133–143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  176. Ogura, H.; Mujumdar, A.S. Proposal for a novel chemical heat pump dryer. Dry. Technol. 2000, 18, 1033–1053. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  177. Yu, Y.Q.; Zhang, P.; Wu, J.Y.; Wang, R.Z. Energy upgrading by solid-gas reaction heat transformer: A critical review. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2008, 12, 1302–1324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  178. Fadhel, M.I.; Sopian, K.; Daud, W.R.W. Performance analysis of solar-assisted chemical heat-pump dryer. Sol. Energy 2010, 84, 1920–1928. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  179. Ramli, M.S.A.; Misha, S.; Haminudin, N.F.; Rosli, M.A.M.; Yusof, A.A.; Sopian, K.; Ibrahim, A.; Abdullah, A.F. Dehumidification of recirculation air from solar dryer using silica gel for food product drying. In Proceedings of Mechanical Engineering Research Day 2022, Melaka, Malaysia, 13 July 2022; UTeM Press: Melaka, Malaysia, 2022; pp. 170–171. [Google Scholar]
  180. Djaeni, M.; Utari, F.D.; Sasongko, S.B.; Kumoro, A.C. Evaluation of food drying with air dehumidification system: A short review. In IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science; IOP Publishing: Bristol, UK, 2018; Volume 102. [Google Scholar]
  181. El Miz, M.; Salhi, S.; Chraibi, I.; El Bachiri, A.; Fauconnier, M.-L.; Tahani, A. Characterization and Adsorption Study of Thymol on Pillared Bentonite. Open J. Phys. Chem. 2014, 4, 98–116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  182. Yahya, M.; Sopian, K.; Daud, W.R.W.; Othman, M.Y.; Yatim, B. Performance of a solar assisted dehumidification system for Centella asiatica L. In Proceedings of the 8th WSEAS International Conference on Power Systems, Santander, Cantabria, Spain, 23–25 September 2008; pp. 306–311. Available online: https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:55676223 (accessed on 8 July 2023).
  183. Loemba, A.B.T.; Kichonge, B.; Kivevele, T. Comprehensive assessment of heat pump dryers for drying agricultural products. Energy Sci. Eng. 2022, 11, 2985–3014. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  184. Delgado-Plaza, E.; Peralta-Jaramillo, J.; Quilambaqui, M.; Gonzalez, O.; Reinoso-Tigre, J.; Arevalo, A.; Arancibia, M.; Paucar, M.; Velázquez-Martí, B. Thermal evaluation of a hybrid dryer with solar and geothermal energy for agroindustry application. Appl. Sci. 2019, 9, 4079. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  185. Ivanova Dandonov, K. Analytical and experimental study of combined fruit and vegetable dryer. Energy Convers. Manag. 2001, 42, 975–983. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  186. Sircar, A.; Yadav, K.; Bist, N. Application of Geothermal Water for Food and Crop Drying. Int. J. Innov. Res. Technol. 2021, 8, 2349–6002. [Google Scholar]
  187. Fudholi, A.; Sopian, K.; Ruslan, M.H.; Alghoul, M.A.; Sulaiman, M.Y. Review of solar dryers for agricultural and marine products. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2010, 14, 1–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  188. Belessiotis, V.; Delyannis, E. Solar drying. Sol. Energy 2011, 85, 1665–1691. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  189. Sun-Waterhouse, D. The development of fruit-based functional foods targeting the health and wellness market—A review. Int. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2011, 46, 899–920. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  190. Sadeghi, G.; Taheri, O.; Mobadersani, F. New Technologies of Solar Drying Systems for Agricultural and Marine Products. In Proceedings of the 1st Middle-East Drying Conference (MEDC2012), Mahshar, Iran, 19–20 February 2012; pp. 1–6. Available online: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/234143985_NEW_TECHNOLOGIES_OF_SOLAR_DRYING_SYSTEMS_FOR_AGRICULTURAL_AND_MARINE_PRODUCTS (accessed on 24 April 2023).
  191. El-Sebaii, A.A.; Shalaby, S.M. Solar drying of agricultural products: A review. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2012, 16, 37–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  192. Yadav, A.K.; Singh, S.V. Osmotic dehydration of fruits and vegetables: A review. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2014, 51, 1654–1673. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  193. Phadke, P.C.; Walke, P.V.; Kriplani, V.M. A review on indirect solar dryers. ARPN J. Eng. Appl. Sci. 2015, 10, 3360–3371. [Google Scholar]
  194. Suman, S.; Khan, M.K.; Pathak, M. Performance enhancement of solar collectors—A review. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2015, 49, 192–210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  195. Zarezade, M.; Mostafaeipour, A. Identifying the effective factors on implementing the solar dryers for Yazd province, Iran. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2016, 57, 765–775. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  196. Kiggundu, N.; Wanyama, J.; Galyaki, C.; Banadda, N.; Muyonga, J.H.; Zziwa, A.; Kabenge, I. Solar fruit drying technologies for smallholder farmers in Uganda, a review of design constraints and solutions. Agric. Eng. Int. CIGR J. 2016, 18, 200–210. [Google Scholar]
  197. Sharif, Z.; Mustapha, F.; Jai, J.; Mohd Yusof, N.; Zaki, N. Review on methods for preservation and natural preservatives for extending the food longevity. Chem. Eng. Res. Bull. 2017, 19, 145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  198. Tomar, V.; Tiwari, G.N.; Norton, B. Solar dryers for tropical food preservation: Thermophysics of crops, systems and components. Sol. Energy 2017, 154, 2–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  199. Abbasi, H.; Ghanavati, H.S.; Ghanavati, H.S. A comprehensive review on different kinds of solar dryers and their performance. J. Renew. New Energy 2018, 6, 47–55. [Google Scholar]
  200. Bhilwadikar, T.; Pounraj, S.; Manivannan, S.; Rastogi, N.K.; Negi, P.S. Decontamination of Microorganisms and Pesticides from Fresh Fruits and Vegetables: A Comprehensive Review from Common Household Processes to Modern Techniques. Compr. Rev. Food Sci. Food Saf. 2019, 18, 1003–1038. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  201. Lamidi, R.O.; Jiang, L.; Pathare, P.B.; Wang, Y.D.; Roskilly, A.P. Recent advances in sustainable drying of agricultural produce: A review. Appl. Energy 2019, 233, 367–385. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  202. Udomkun, P.; Romuli, S.; Schock, S.; Mahayothee, B.; Sartas, M.; Wossen, T.; Njukwe, E.; Vanlauwe, B.; Müller, J. Review of solar dryers for agricultural products in Asia and Africa: An innovation landscape approach. J. Environ. Manag. 2020, 268, 110730. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  203. Daliran, A.; Taki, M. A review on recent innovations and developments in greenhouse solar dryers. J. Renew. New Energy 2021, 8, 63–74. [Google Scholar]
  204. Kumar, P.; Singh, D. Advanced technologies and performance investigations of solar dryers: A review. Renew. Energy Focus. 2020, 35, 148–158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  205. Mishra, S.; Verma, S.; Chowdhury, S.; Dwivedi, G. Analysis of recent developments in greenhouse dryer on various parameters—A review. Mater. Today Proc. 2020, 38, 371–377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  206. Mohana, Y.; Mohanapriya, R.; Anukiruthika, T.; Yoha, K.S.; Moses, J.A.; Anandharamakrishnan, C. Solar dryers for food applications: Concepts, designs and recent advances. Sol. Energy 2020, 208, 321–344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  207. Gorjian, S.; Hosseingholilou, B.; Jathar, L.D.; Samadi, H.; Samanta, S.; Sagade, A.A.; Kant, K.; Sathyamurthy, R. Recent advancements in technical design and thermal performance enhancement of solar greenhouse dryers. Sustainability 2021, 13, 7025. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  208. Ahmadi, A.; Das, B.; Ehyaei, M.A.; Esmaeilion, F.; Assad, M.E.H.; Jamali, D.H.; Koohshekan, O.; Kumar, R.; Rosen, M.A.; Negi, S.; et al. Energy, exergy and techno-economic performance analyses of solar dryers for agro products: A comprehensive review. Sol. Energy 2021, 228, 349–373. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  209. Getahun, E.; Delele, M.A.; Gabbiye, N.; Fanta, S.W.; Demissie, P.; Vanierschot, M. Importance of integrated CFD and product quality modeling of solar dryers for fruits and vegetables: A review. Sol. Energy 2021, 220, 88–110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  210. Dake, R.A.; N’Tsoukpoe, K.E.; Kuznik, F.; Lèye, B.; Ouédraogo, I.W.K. A review on the use of sorption materials in solar dryers. Renew. Energy 2021, 175, 965–979. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  211. Nukulwar, M.R.; Tungikar, V.B. A review on performance evaluation of solar dryer and its material for drying agricultural products. Mater. Today Proc. 2021, 46, 345–349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  212. Sharma, M.; Atheaya, D.; Kumar, A. Recent advancements of PCM based indirect type solar drying systems: A state of art. Mater. Today Proc. 2021, 47, 5852–5855. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  213. Singh, P.; Gaur, M.K. A review on thermal analysis of hybrid greenhouse solar dryer (HGSD). J. Therm. Eng. 2022, 8, 103–119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  214. Bani Hani, E.H.; Alhuyi Nazari, M.; Assad, M.E.H.; Forootan Fard, H.; Maleki, A. Solar dryers as a promising drying technology: A comprehensive review. J. Therm. Anal. Calorim. 2022, 147, 12285–12300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  215. Prasad, A.K.; Singh, M.K. Design and analysis of different types of solar collector for solar air dryer: A review. In Proceedings of the 2022 1st IEEE International Conference on Industrial Electronics: Developments & Applications (ICIDeA), Bhubaneswar, India, 15–16 October 2022; pp. 169–174. [Google Scholar]
  216. Setiawan, K.E.; Elwirehardja, G.N.; Pardamean, B. Systematic Literature Review on Machine Learning Predictive Models for Indoor Climate in Smart Solar Dryer Dome. In Proceedings of the 2022 4th International Conference on Cybernetics and Intelligent System (ICORIS), Prapat, Indonesia, 8–9 October 2022; pp. 1–7. [Google Scholar]
  217. Jobair, H.K.; Nima, M.A. The indirect solar dryers with innovative solar air heaters designs: A review article. Heat. Transf. 2022, 52, 2400–2436. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  218. Ahmad, A.; Prakash, O.; Kumar, A.; Chatterjee, R.; Sharma, S.; Kumar, V.; Kulshreshtha, K.; Li, C.; Eldin, E.M.T. A Comprehensive State-of-the-Art Review on the Recent Developments in Greenhouse Drying. Energies 2022, 15, 9493. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  219. Mirzaei, S.; Ameri, M.; Mortezapour, H. Comparative energy-exergy and economic-environmental analyses of recently advanced solar photovoltaic and photovoltaic thermal hybrid dryers: A review. Dry. Technol. 2022, 41, 655–706. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  220. Mehta, P.; Bhatt, N.; Bassan, G.; Kabeel, A.E. Performance improvement and advancement studies of mixed-mode solar thermal dryers: A review. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2022, 29, 62822–62838. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  221. Yao, Y.; Pang, Y.X.; Manickam, S.; Lester, E.; Wu, T.; Pang, C.H. A review study on recent advances in solar drying: Mechanisms, challenges and perspectives. Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells 2022, 248, 111979. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  222. Devan, P.K.; Bibin, C.; Asburris Shabrin, I.; Gokulnath, R.; Karthick, D. Solar drying of fruits—A comprehensive review. Mater. Today Proc. 2020, 33, 253–260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  223. Gomes, L.A.C.N.; Gonçalves, R.F.; Martins, M.F.; Sogari, C.N. Assessing the suitability of solar dryers applied to wastewater plants: A review. J. Environ. Manag. 2023, 326, 116640. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  224. Kale, S.G.; Havaldar, S.N. Performance enhancement techniques for indirect mode solar dryer: A review. Mater. Today Proc. 2023, 72, 1117–1124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  225. Madhankumar, S.; Viswanathan, K.; Ikhsan, M.; Wu, W. A review on the latest developments in solar dryer technologies for food drying process. Sustain. Energy Technol. Assess. 2023, 58, 103298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  226. Ndukwu, M.C.; Matthew, I.; Okon, B.B.; Godwin, A.; Kalu, C.A.; Inemesit, E.; Chris, N.; Abam, F.I.; Lamrani, B.; Tagne, M.S.; et al. Progressive review of solar drying studies of agricultural products with exergoeconomics and econo-market participation aspect. Clean. Environ. Syst. 2023, 9, 100120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  227. Rizalman, M.K.; Moung, E.G.; Dargham, J.A.; Jamain, Z.; Yaakub, N.M.; Farzamnia, A. A review of solar drying technology for agricultural produce. Indones. J. Electr. Eng. Comput. Sci. 2023, 30, 1407–1419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  228. Maryana, Y.E.; Saputra, D.; Priyanto, G.; Yuliati, K. A review of the inflated solar dryer for improving the quality of agricultural product. In IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science; IOP Publishing: Bristol, UK, 2023; Volume 1160. [Google Scholar]
  229. Kazem, H.A.; Al-Waeli, A.H.A.; Chaichan, M.T.; Sopian, K.; Al Busaidi, A.S.; Gholami, A. Photovoltaic-thermal systems applications as dryer for agriculture sector: A review. Case Stud. Therm. Eng. 2023, 47, 103047. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Solar 04 00002 g001
Figure 1. Solar resource map of direct normal irradiation (https://globalsolaratlas.info/map, accessed on 15 July 2023).
Figure 1. Solar resource map of direct normal irradiation (https://globalsolaratlas.info/map, accessed on 15 July 2023).
Solar 04 00002 g001
Solar 04 00002 g002
Figure 2. Schematic summary of the classification of solar dryers.
Figure 2. Schematic summary of the classification of solar dryers.
Solar 04 00002 g002
Solar 04 00002 g003
Figure 3. Schematic of working principle of open sun drying method.
Figure 3. Schematic of working principle of open sun drying method.
Solar 04 00002 g003
Solar 04 00002 g004
Figure 4. Schematic of working principle of direct drying method.
Figure 4. Schematic of working principle of direct drying method.
Solar 04 00002 g004
Solar 04 00002 g005
Figure 5. Schematic of working principle of indirect drying method.
Figure 5. Schematic of working principle of indirect drying method.
Solar 04 00002 g005
Solar 04 00002 g006
Figure 6. Schematic of working principle of hybrid (solar–thermal) drying method.
Figure 6. Schematic of working principle of hybrid (solar–thermal) drying method.
Solar 04 00002 g006
Solar 04 00002 g007
Figure 7. Examples of passive solar dryers: (a) direct [96]; (b) cabinet [97]; (c) greenhouse, dome type [98]; (d) mixed-mode [99].
Figure 7. Examples of passive solar dryers: (a) direct [96]; (b) cabinet [97]; (c) greenhouse, dome type [98]; (d) mixed-mode [99].
Solar 04 00002 g007
Solar 04 00002 g008
Figure 8. Examples of active solar dryers: (a) indirect [7]; (b) greenhouse, roof even- type [105], (c) direct with concentrating panels [106]; (d) mixed-mode tent-type [107].
Figure 8. Examples of active solar dryers: (a) indirect [7]; (b) greenhouse, roof even- type [105], (c) direct with concentrating panels [106]; (d) mixed-mode tent-type [107].
Solar 04 00002 g008
Solar 04 00002 g009
Figure 9. Overview of the distribution of the publications and type of dried products, all over the world, consulted in this review article.
Figure 9. Overview of the distribution of the publications and type of dried products, all over the world, consulted in this review article.
Solar 04 00002 g009
Table 1. Published studies related to OSD experiments.
Table 1. Published studies related to OSD experiments.
Principle of StudyPrincipal AchievementsCrop/ProductLocationYearRef.
Lab model vacuum-assisted solar dryerThe final moisture content of 11.5 ± 0.5% was 360, 480 and 600 min in a vacuum-assisted solar dryer and 450, 600 and 750 min in an OSD. The temperature inside the vacuum chamber was 48 °C when the ambient temperature was 30 °C.Tomato slicesCanada2007[16]
compared with OSDThe maximum temperature difference between hot air and ambient air is 35.4 °C and the maximum efficiency of the setup is calculated at 55%.VariousIndia2019[17]
Comparison of OSD and solar drying based on an evacuated tube collectorReduction in drying time was 18.87% compared with the tilted system and 21.82% compared with the horizontal flat-plate system.BananaThailand2022[30]
OSD with automatic dual-axis solar trackingThe instantaneous thermal efficiency of the solar collector varied between 30% and 80% at a mass flow rate of 0.047 kg/s. The overall energy efficiency of the solar dryer was 34%.Red pepperTunisia2019[31]
Solar drying of red pepper with a mixed-mode solar greenhouse dryer (SGD) with forced convection compared with an OSDThe principal evaluation was in mycotoxins and the recommendation was to use a solar tent dryer to improve the safety of food during processing and preservation.PlantainNigeria2021[32]
ExperimentThe drying rate of solar dryers was higher than that of hot air dryers and OSDs. The aroma of dried mint was maintained in solar-dried samples but was lost in the hot air dryer and OSD.MintIndia2017[33]
Solar tent, dried and OSDFrom 79.8% to 20.2% of moisture content, it takes 120 h in indirect solar and 201 h in OSD.GrapesMorocco2018[34]
A comparative study of OSD, solar drying and hot air cabinet dryingFaster drying rate in active drying (18.67% in 9 h) compared to passive drying (24.24% in 12 h) and OSD (24.24% in 24 h)Red ChiliesIndia2020[35]
Drying behavior of OSD and indirect solar dryersDrying from 28% to 13% moisture content was 300 to 540 min; with black polythene and fertilizer bags, it was 120 to 156 min. Performance significantly varies with the drying pad and thickness of the paddy.Paddy RiceSri Lanka2021[36]
A comparative study of solar hybrid greenhouse drying and OSDSolar-tunnel (T1) and solar-cum gas (T2) are more efficient compared with OSD (T3). The T1 and T2 methods reduced the moisture level from 80% to 10–12% in 63 and 54 h, respectively, compared to the 81 h taken by T3.Red ChiliesPakistan2022[37]
OSD suitable drying conditionsThe 10% vinegar as a pre-treatment showed no significant difference (p ≤ 0.05) in the bacterial population reduction.Ginger rhizomesGhana2022[38]
Comparison between Solar Tunnel, Solar-Cum Gas Dryer and OSDThe model was the best drying model with the highest correlation coefficient.FigsTurkey2018[39]
Strengths: independent of any source of energy; cheapest method; environmentally friend; Weaknesses: crops exposed to animals and weather changes; microorganism’s contamination; discoloration by UV radiation; non-controlled drying.
Table 2. Published studies related to DSD experiments.
Table 2. Published studies related to DSD experiments.
Principle of StudyPrincipal AchievementsCrop/ProductLocationYearRef.
Forced convention solar dryerA black-painted solar dryer is 2–5 times more effective than an OSD.GrapesIndia2021[40]
Direct (cabinet type) operating at natural and forced convection and indirect (air heated by a solar water heating system)Indirect solar drying has superior conditions, moderate drying times, better control of the operating conditions and greater protection against the effects of temperature compared with direct exposure to solar radiation.Stevia leavesMexico2018[41]
Experimental studies on natural convection in open and closed solar drying using an external reflectorCompared to open solar drying, about 20% of energy could be saved by modified solar dryer with external reflectorsAnchovy fishIndia2022[42]
Quality analysis and drying characteristics of turmeric (Curcuma longa L.) dried by hot air and direct solar dryersEnergy could be saved using the modified solar dryer with external reflectors.Turmeric rhizomesIndia2021[43]
Effect of film thickness and location of the sample inside a direct solar dryer on the drying kinetics of viscera silage in red tilapiaHigher effective diffusivity and lower drying time for DSD turmeric than HADRed TilapiaColombia2020[44]
Thin-layer DSDThe location of the sample inside the dryer and the film thickness affect the final product. MangoesBurkina Faso2011[45]
Effect of direct solar drying on quality attributes
of turmeric with computer vision technology		Drying rates and efficiency decreased with the number of drying days.Turmeric rhizomesIndia2019[46]
Single-slope DSDComputer vision is a non-destructive technique that can be applied for online monitoring of quality control in the spice industry.Red bananasIndia2021[47]
DSD cabinet typeForced convection is faster than natural; a novel kinetics model.TomatoesBrazil2021[48]
Mathematical model for a DSD Tomatoes ’Carmen’ can be dried in 30 h.VariousIndia2022[49]
DSDDetermination of optimal hole size and spacing between the glass and the absorber plate.VariousUSA2006[50]
DSD greenhouse typeCarotene content of solar-dried vegetables.PearsPortugal2007[51]
Strengths: protected crops; independent of any source of energy; cheap; environmentally friend; Weaknesses: limited to small scales; discoloration by UV radiation; moisture condensation inside transparent cover reduces transmittivity.
Table 3. Published studies related to ISD experiments.
Table 3. Published studies related to ISD experiments.
Principle of StudyPrincipal AchievementsCrop/ProductLocationYearRef.
Construction and study of a friendly solar ISDA low-cost and environmentally friendly way to make home-made snacks with recycled materials VariousPortugal2022[7]
A solar dryer with a flat plate absorber and thermal storage and natural convectionThe economic performance of the dryer was analyzed based on the optimum cost of raw materials and the product sale price.Leafy herbsJodhpur (India)2015[24]
Testing various solar dryers’ designsLaboratory models of direct (cabinet), indirect and mixed-mode solar dryers are designed and constructed to perform steady-state thermal tests for natural and forced air circulation.n/aDelhi (India)2012[26]
ISD: solar air heater with absorber systems in a flat-plate collectorThe dryer was suitable for the preservation of mangoes and other fresh foods.MangoesMalawi2002[52]
ISD with a single compartmentThermal and economic performances of the designed dryerPearsMorocco2022[53]
Indirect forced cabinet solar drying + OSDEffectiveness of IFCSD against the OSDApplesKabul (Afghanistan)2021[54]
ISDDevelopment of an ISD and the performance and drying kinetics of brinjal and tomatoTomato and brinjalIndia2021[55]
Comparison between passive and active ISDForced convection performed better in all parameters than natural convection.CarrotsTelangana (India)2023[56]
Natural convection ISDThe dryer was fabricated using low-cost, locally available materials with a simple design that can easily be replicated elsewhere in the world.ApplesJapan2016[57]
ISD and OSDReduction from 10 to 4 days in the drying durationFigsMorocco2018[58]
ISDThe drying duration of the product was reduced considerably in comparison with traditional sun drying.Bitter gourdIndia2008[59]
ISDDryers built with low-cost materials, simple operation and high energy efficiencyVariousMexico2013[60]
ISD with 2 collectorsCombining two types of collectors (natural and forced circulation) offers versatility in its operation.MangoesMexico2017[61]
ISD 2 collectors compared with OSDThe solar dryer accelerated drying more than two times over open-air sun drying.OnionsChina2014[62]
Strengths: better control over drying process; avoids direct exposition to sun, preserving quality; allows a lot of designs depending on the goal; Weaknesses: more expensive; requires higher temperatures; low drying rate, especially passive mode.
Table 4. Published studies related to HSD experiments.
Table 4. Published studies related to HSD experiments.
Principle of StudyPrincipal AchievementsCrop/ProductLocationYearRef.
HSD, DSD and OSD comparisonThe efficiency of agricultural dryers is increased through the use of a combination of solar and heating elements powered by a photovoltaic (PV) solar panel, compared to conventional dryers with only solar or biomass heating sources.TomatoNigeria2016[63]
HSD heater powered by liquefied natural gasResults suggest that the hybrid solar dryer is faster than both open sun drying and natural solar drying. HSD at 40 to 100 °C increases dryer efficiency (13 to 17%).Sugar-palm vermicelliIndonesia2020[64]
Indirect active hybrid solar-electrical dryerThe influence of drying air temperature on the variation of moisture versus drying time on the food process is more important compared to the influence of air-drying velocity.TomatoAlgeria2009[65]
HSD with solar panels and electric resistancesDryer efficiency proved useful for designing an industrial-level HSD. MushroomsChile2013[66]
HSD with liquefied petroleum gasThe dryer needs improvements because it is able to dry the lime, but the temperature may damage the fresh goods.LimeJava (Indonesia)2020[67]
ISD (improved solar dryer) and SPE (solar photovoltaic and electric) compared with OSDSuperior performance of the ISD and SPE dryers than the OSD method; reduced costs for ISD than SPEPineapple slicesUganda (Africa)2020[68]
Indirect-type domestic HSDDryer construction and exergy analysis, drying kinetics and performance evaluationTomatoesDelhi (India)2022[69]
PV/T unit, V-corrugated collector, heat storage unit and drying chamberThree cases of no phase change material (PCM), PCM only and nano-enhanced PCM were used. PCM proved to be effective in terms of lowering the temperature inside the chamber. Recirculation of heat may be needed.MintIran2022[70]
Electric and solar hybrid solar ovensHybrid performance and thermal control maintain temperature stability, which allows cooking.n/aArgentina2012[71]
Hybrid thermal energy storage systemSolar energy is stored during sunny days and released later during cloudy days or at night. Electricity consumption is minimized.n/aQuébec (Canada)2006[72]
PV/T greenhouse dryers compared with OSD and shadeThe hybrid PV/T dryer proved to be more efficient in terms of moisture evaporation and heat transfer coefficient.GrapesNew Delhi (India)2008[73]
Hybrid PV solar dryer compared with OSDThe dryer suits the purpose and prevents spoilage and post-harvest losses.TomatoesYola (Nigeria)2017[74]
Solar energy with biomass-fueled air heatingDry fish in 15 hFishAceh (Indonesia)2018[75]
HSDThe total energy required is 89.9 kWh and the solar energy contribution is 66%. Salted silver jewfishMalaysia2016[76]
Solar-biomass HDPretreatments like microwave blanching followed by brine solution dipping of carrots prior to drying affect the quality of dried carrots positively.Carrot slicesBhopal (India)2018[77]
Indirect HSDThe indirect solar dryer performance was investigated with and without PCM, during the day and at night.n/aTunisia2017[78]
Strengths: continuous drying even without sun and during the night; reduces drying time because it does not depend on the weather; Weaknesses: bigger environmental footprint; running costs.
Table 5. Published studies related to different devices according to the mode of air movement.
Table 5. Published studies related to different devices according to the mode of air movement.
Principle of StudyPrincipal AchievementsCrop/ProductLocationYearRef.
UV sheet cabinet-type solar dryerForced convection drying is the most efficient way of drying when compared to natural and open sun drying.BananaIndia2022[79]
NCD-FCD-HPDThe drying rate increases with the increase in temperature and speed of the drying air.MushroomsTurkey2021[108]
Passive flat-plate collector solar dryerDrying took 36.36% less time than OSD.MushroomsIndia2020[109]
Shade drying, sun drying and solar dryingThe more efficient method was conventional solar drying along with air recycling with a higher drying rate.Pistachio nutsIran2020[110]
ISD- OSDChanges in weather during the day affect the water activity of dried products. Mint leavesAfghanistan2021[111]
Compact solar cabinet dryerFor 47–50 °C, the dryer is suitable.Pork meatThailand2017[112]
ISDISD outperforms OSD in efficiency and acceptability of products.Amaranth leavesMozambique2021[113]
Solar greenhouseThe drying temperature of the tomato waste varies between 40 and 58 °C and takes 5 h.TomatoesAlgeria2019[105]
ISDThe study established a model of thin-layer drying of mango.MangoesBurkina Faso2009[114]
Mixed-mode PV+ solar tunnel dryerSTD provides chips in good quality and suitable for rural areasPotatoesSaudi Arabia2018[115]
Mixed-mode and direct-mode solar dryersMixed modes A solar dryer can dehydrate vegetables to a moisture content of below 10%, transforming perishable vegetables into stable products.African indigenous vegetable and chiliKenya2017[104]
Hybrid mixed-mode solar dryerSuitable for a wide range of perishable agricultural productsPeaches, apples, chilliPakistan2023[116]
Mixed-mode solar dryerSolar drying of injera is a feasible method for preserving and maintaining the quality of dried injera (dirkosh) with a minimum cost.InjeraEthiopia2021[117]
Mixed-mode and direct-type solar dryersMMTD values are higher than DMTD except for water depletion.GingerIndia2022[118]
Direct solar dryer with three axial flow fansThe drying system can be used for a wide range of agricultural products.White Oyster MushroomMalaysia2015[119]
Mixed-mode natural convection dryerDrying efficiency was evaluated at 12.3% when tested under the full designed load.CassavaGhana2007[120]
ISDThe final moisture contents for thymus and mint were reached after 34 and 5 h.Thymus plant/mintEgypt2013[121]
Concentrating solar panelsFaster drying rates are achieved with solar concentrators.TomatoesUSA2012[106]
Table 6. Overview of published review articles using solar energy dryers, since 2010.
Table 6. Overview of published review articles using solar energy dryers, since 2010.
TitleYearRef.
Review of solar dryers for agricultural and marine products2010[187]
A Review of Photovoltaic Thermal (PVT) Technology for Residential Applications2010[157]
Solar dryer with thermal energy storage systems for drying agricultural food products: A review2010[131]
Solar drying2011[188]
The development of fruit-based functional foods targeting the health and wellness market_ a review2011[189]
New Technologies of Solar Drying Systems for Agricultural and Marine Products2012[190]
Solar drying of agricultural products: A review2012[191]
Performance study of different solar dryers: A review2014[9]
A Review of Solar Dryer Technologies2014[20]
Solar greenhouse drying: A review2014[85]
Osmotic dehydration of fruits and vegetables: a review2014[192]
Applications of software in solar drying systems: A review2015[19]
A review on indirect solar dryers2015[193]
Direct Type Natural Convection Solar Dryer: A review2015[81]
Performance enhancement of solar collectors—A review2015[194]
A Review on Solar Drying of Agricultural Produce2016[13]
Development and recent trends in greenhouse dryer: A review2016[22]
Progress in solar dryers for drying various commodities2016[29]
Identifying the effective factors on implementing the solar dryers for Yazd province, Iran2016[195]
Solar fruit drying technologies for smallholder farmers in Uganda, a review of design constraints and solutions2016[196]
A review on solar tunnel greenhouse drying system2016[152]
Thermal energy storage based solar drying systems: A review2016[125]
Review on various modelling techniques for the solar dryers2016[88]
Review on methods for preservation and natural preservatives for extending the food longevity2017[197]
Solar dryers for tropical food preservation: Thermophysics of crops, systems and components2017[198]
An investigation on solar drying: A review with economic and environmental assessment2018[15]
Evaluation of food drying with air dehumidification system: A short review2018[180]
A comprehensive review on different kinds of solar dryers and their performance2018[199]
Decontamination of Microorganisms and Pesticides from Fresh Fruits and Vegetables: A Comprehensive Review from Common Household Processes to Modern Techniques2019[200]
Recent advances in sustainable drying of agricultural produce: A review2019[201]
Solar Energy on Demand: A Review on High Temperature Thermochemical Heat Storage Systems and Materials2019[137]
Review of solar dryers for agricultural products in Asia and Africa: An innovation landscape approach2020[202]
A review on indirect type solar dryers for agricultural crops—Dryer setup, its performance, energy storage and important highlights2020[89]
A review of construction, material and performance in mixed mode passive solar dryers2020[95]
Solar assisted heat pump system for high quality drying applications: A critical review2020[162]
A review on recent innovations and developments in greenhouse solar dryers2020[203]
Advanced technologies and performance investigations of solar dryers: A review2020[204]
Analysis of recent developments in greenhouse dryer on various parameters- a review2020[205]
Solar dryers for food applications: Concepts, designs and recent advances2020[206]
Integration of solar heating systems for low-temperature heat demand in food processing industry—A review2021[10]
Recent advancements in technical design and thermal performance enhancement of solar greenhouse dryers2021[207]
Global advancement of solar drying technologies and its future prospects: A review2021[122]
Natural convection and direct type (NCDT) solar dryers: a review2021[80]
A review on solar dryers integrated with thermal energy storage units for drying agricultural and food products2021[128]
A review of the indirect solar dryer with sensible heat storage mediums2021[133]
Application of Geothermal Water for Food and Crop Drying2021[186]
Energy, exergy and techno-economic performance analyses of solar dryers for agro products: A comprehensive review2021[208]
Importance of integrated CFD and product quality modelling of solar dryers for fruits and vegetables: A review2021[209]
A review on the use of sorption materials in solar dryers2021[210]
A review on performance evaluation of solar dryer and its material for drying agricultural products2021[211]
Recent advancements of PCM based indirect type solar drying systems: A state of art2021[212]
Solar drying Technologies: A review and future research directions with a focus on agro-industrial applications in medium and large scale2022[14]
A review on thermal analysis of hybrid greenhouse solar dryer (HGSD)2022[213]
Solar dryers as a promising drying technology: a comprehensive review2022[214]
Design and analysis of different types of solar collector for solar air dryer: A review2022[215]
Systematic Literature Review on Machine Learning Predictive Models For Indoor Climate In Smart Solar Dryer Dome2022[216]
The indirect solar dryers with innovative solar air heaters designs: A review article2022[217]
A Comprehensive State-of-the-Art Review on the Recent Developments in Greenhouse Drying2022[218]
Comparative energy-exergy and economic-environmental analyses of recently advanced solar photovoltaic and photovoltaic thermal hybrid dryers: a review2022[219]
Performance improvement and advancement studies of mixed-mode solar thermal dryers: a review2022[220]
A review study on recent advances in solar drying: Mechanisms, challenges and perspectives2022[221]
Solar drying of fruits—A comprehensive review2022[222]
A review of industrial food processing using solar dryers with heat storage systems2023[130]
Thermal energy storage systems applied to solar dryers: Classification, performance and numerical modelling: An updated review2023[127]
Designs, Performance and Economic Feasibility of Domestic Solar Dryers2023[92]
Assessing the suitability of solar dryers applied to wastewater plants: A review2023[223]
Performance enhancement techniques for indirect mode solar dryer: A review2023[224]
A review on the latest developments in solar dryer technologies for food drying process2023[225]
Progressive review of solar drying studies of agricultural products with exergoeconomics and econo-market participation aspect2023[226]
A review of solar drying technology for agricultural produce2023[227]
A review of the inflated solar dryer for improving the quality of agricultural product2023[228]
Photovoltaic-thermal systems applications as dryer for agriculture sector: A review2023[229]
Table 7. Principal advantages/disadvantages of solar energy utilization in fresh products dehydration.
Table 7. Principal advantages/disadvantages of solar energy utilization in fresh products dehydration.
AdvantagesDisadvantages
Solar 04 00002 i001Solar 04 00002 i002
  • Benefiting from solar energy as a renewable source for food consumption;
  • Dependence on climatic variables;
  • Possibility of utilization of recycled and low-cost materials;
  • Could be less efficient compared with electrical dryers
  • Does not require specialized labor and promotes the reduction in crop losses;
  • Lack of investment in this type of processing
  • Extending the preservation of food. Dried foods are also easier to store and transport, promoting convenience in consumption, which is valued in nutrition due to the absence of added sugar and other additives.
  • For products requiring continuous drying, a backup heating system is necessary
  • Contributes positively to sustainability and environmental preservation;
  • Improved food preservation, especially in underdeveloped countries where electricity could be unavailable;
  • Can generate income for small-scale producers and reduce losses;
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Fernandes, L.; Tavares, P.B. A Review on Solar Drying Devices: Heat Transfer, Air Movement and Type of Chambers. Solar 2024, 4, 15-42. https://doi.org/10.3390/solar4010002

AMA Style

Fernandes L, Tavares PB. A Review on Solar Drying Devices: Heat Transfer, Air Movement and Type of Chambers. Solar. 2024; 4(1):15-42. https://doi.org/10.3390/solar4010002

Chicago/Turabian Style

Fernandes, Lisete, and Pedro B. Tavares. 2024. "A Review on Solar Drying Devices: Heat Transfer, Air Movement and Type of Chambers" Solar 4, no. 1: 15-42. https://doi.org/10.3390/solar4010002

APA Style

Fernandes, L., & Tavares, P. B. (2024). A Review on Solar Drying Devices: Heat Transfer, Air Movement and Type of Chambers. Solar, 4(1), 15-42. https://doi.org/10.3390/solar4010002

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop