Dialogic and Dialectic Cooperation for Knowledge Creation in IS-Mediated Open Innovation
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Open Innovation Strategies and Implementation Models
3. Open Innovation and Forms of Cooperation
4. Computer-Supported Cooperation/Collaboration in Open Innovation
5. Institutional Isomorphism, Innovation Strategy and Forms of Cooperation
6. Development of Hypotheses
6.1. Competitive Strategies, Strategic Orientation and Innovation Strategies
6.2. Dialogic and Dialectic Cooperation and Open Innovation
6.3. Isomorphism, Past Involvement and Forms of Cooperation
7. Research Methodology
Constructs, Factors and Variables
8. Results and Hypothesis Testing
8.1. Factor Development and Testing
8.2. Hypothesis Testing
9. Discussion
10. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- West, J.; Salter, A.; Vanhaverbek, W.; Chesbrough, H. Open innovation: The next decade. Res. Policy 2014, 43, 805–811. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tsinopoulos, C.; Sousa, C.M.P.; Yan, J. Process innovation: Open innovation and the moderating role of the motivation to achieve legitimacy. J. Prod. Innov. Manag. 2018, 35, 27–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Saebi, T.; Foss, N.J. Business models for open innovation: Matching heterogeneous open innovation strategies with business model dimensions. Eur. Manag. J. 2015, 33, 201–213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Möslein, K.M. Open Innovation: Actors, Tools, and Tensions. In Leading Open Innovation; The MIT Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2013; pp. 69–85. ISBN 9780262018494. [Google Scholar]
- Nonaka, I.; Takeuchi, H. The Knowledge-Creating Company: How Japanese Companies Create the Dynamics of Innovation; Oxford University Press: New York, NY, USA, 1995. [Google Scholar]
- Malhotra, A.; Majchrzak, A. Managing crowds in innovation challenges. Calif. Manag. Rev. 2014, 56, 103–123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Midgley, G.; Lindhult, E. A systems perspective on systemic innovation. Syst. Res. Behav. Sci. 2021, 38, 535–670. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Weissenberger-Eibl, M.A.; Hampel, T. Bridging the gap: Integrating external knowledge from open innovation platforms. SN Bus. Econ. 2021, 1, 98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sennett, R. Together: The Rituals, Pleasures and Politics of Cooperation; Penguin Books: London, UK, 2012. [Google Scholar]
- Brunswicker, S.; Hutschek, U.; Wagner, L. ‘Exploration’ in the open innovation front-end: The role of technologies. Int. J. Technol. Intell. Plan. 2012, 8, 1–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- O’Brian, K. Innovation types and the search for new ideas at the fuzzy front end: Where to look and how often? J. Bus. Res. 2020, 107, 13–24. [Google Scholar]
- Adamides, E.D.; Karacapilidis, N.I.; Konstantinopoulos, K. Argumentation schemes in technology-mediated open innovation product-service models: An activity systems perspective. Systems 2021, 9, 91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Adamides, E.; Karacapilidis, N. Information technology for supporting the development and maintenance of open innovation capabilities. J. Innov. Knowl. 2020, 5, 29–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Singh, S.K.; Gupta, S.; Busso, D.; Kamboj, S. Top management knowledge value, knowledge sharing practices, open innovation and organizational performance. J. Bus. Res. 2021, 128, 788–798. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hambrick, D.C.; Mason, P.A. Upper echelons: The organisation as a reflection of its top managers. Acad. Manag. Rev. 1984, 9, 193–206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Piller, F.; Ihl, C. Co-creation with customers. In Leading Open Innovation; The MIT Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2013; pp. 139–155. ISBN 9780262018494. [Google Scholar]
- Anderson, A.R.; Hardwick, J. Collaborating for innovation: The socialised management of knowledge. Int. Entrep. Manag. J. 2017, 13, 1181–1197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pedrosa, A.D.M.; Välling, M.; Boyd, B. Knowledge related activities in open innovation: Managers’ characteristics and practices. Int. J. Technol. Manag. 2013, 61, 254–273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Christensen, E.; Christensen, L.T. Dialogics of strategic communication: Embracing conflicting logics in an emerging field. Corp. Commun. Int. J. 2018, 23, 438–455. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gallaugher, J.; Ransbotham, S. Social media and customer dialog management at Starbucks. MIS Q. Exec. 2010, 9, 197–212. [Google Scholar]
- Shumack, K. Conversations with the self-knowledge creation for designing. Kybernetes 2007, 36, 1515–1528. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tsiotsou, R.H. Introducing relational dialectics on actor engagement in the social media ecosystem. J. Serv. Mark. 2021, 35, 349–366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fonrouge, C.; Bredillet, C.; Fouché, C. Entrepreneurship and project management relationships: So far so good? Dialogic conversation and Luhmannian perspective. Int. J. Manag. Proj. Bus. 2019, 12, 6–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pace, S.; Buzzanca, S.; Fratocchi, L. The structure of conversations on social networks: Between dialogic and dialectic threads. Int. J. Inf. Manag. 2016, 36, 1144–1151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Schwarz, B.B.; Shahar, N. Combining the dialogic and the dialectic: Putting argumentation into practice in classroom talk. Learn. Cult. Soc. Interact. 2017, 12, 113–132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Buhagiar, M.; Pollack, J.; Coyle, S. A categorisation of dialectics in response to project uncertainty. Int. J. Manag. Proj. Bus. 2022, 15, 350–370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kent, M.L.; Taylor, M. Building dialogic relationships through the world wide web. Public Relat. Rev. 1998, 24, 321–334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Van Knippenberg, D.; Giessner, S.R.; Sleebos, E.; van Ginkel, W.P. A motivated information processing perspective on the antecedents of empowering leadership. J. Appl. Soc. Psychol. 2021, 51, 79–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Morin, E. Method: Towards a Study of Humankind: The Nature of Nature; Peter Lang: New York, NY, USA, 1992; Volume 1. [Google Scholar]
- Patroni, J.; von Briel, F.; Recker, J. Unpacking the social media-driven innovation capability: How consumer conversations turn into organizational innovations. Inf. Manag. 2022, 59, 103267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dodgson, M.; Gann, D.; Salter, A. The role of technology in the shift towards open innovation: The case of Procter & Gamble. R&D Manag. 2006, 36, 333–346. [Google Scholar]
- Hrastinski, S.; Kviselius, N.Z.; Ozan, H.; Edenius, M. A review of technologies for open innovation: Characteristics and future trends. In Proceedings of the 43rd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, Kauai, HI, USA, 5–8 January 2010; pp. 1–10. [Google Scholar]
- Bengtsson, L.; Ryzhkova, N. Managing a strategic source of innovation: Online users. Int. J. Inf. Manag. 2013, 33, 655–662. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Corvello, V.; Gitto, D.; Carlsson, S.; Migliarese, P. Using information technology to manage diverse knowledge sources in open innovation processes. In Managing Open Innovation Technologies; Eriksson Lundström, J.S.Z., Ed.; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2013; pp. 179–197. [Google Scholar]
- Bugshan, H. Open innovation using Web 2.0 technologies. J. Enterp. Inf. Manag. 2015, 28, 595–607. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cui, T.; Ye, H.; Teo, H.H.; Li, J. Information technology and open innovation: A strategic alignment perspective. Inf. Manag. 2015, 52, 348–358. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tseng, M.M. Open manufacturing. In Leading Open Innovation; The MIT Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2013; pp. 263–277. ISBN 9780262018494. [Google Scholar]
- Bieler, D. The Forrester Wave™: Innovation Management Solutions, Q2 2016; Forrester: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2016. [Google Scholar]
- Tavakoli, A.; Schlagwein, D.; Schoder, D. Open strategy: Literature review, re-analysis of cases and conceptualization as practice. J. Strateg. Inf. Syst. 2017, 26, 163–184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lichtenthaler, U.; Lichtenthaler, E. A capability-based framework for Open Innovation: Complementing absorptive capacity. J. Manag. Stud. 2009, 46, 1315–1338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Adamides, E.D.; Karacapilidis, N. Understanding the role of Computer-Supported argumentation in the strategic change process. Int. J. Inf. Syst. Soc. Change 2013, 4, 45–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- David, K.G.; Wu, Y.; Pei, C. Openness to innovation as a driver of knowledge integration in high-tech SMEs: The roles of social capital and network competence. Int. J. Knowl. Manag. 2022, 18, 1–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rens Scheepers, R.; Venkitachalam, K.; Gibbs, M.R. Knowledge strategy in organizations: Refining the model of Hansen, Nohria and Tierney. J. Strateg. Inf. Syst. 2004, 13, 201–222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Grant, R.M. Prospering in dynamic competitive environments: Organizational capability as knowledge integration. Organ. Sci. 1996, 7, 375–387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jokubauskienė, R.; Vaotkienė, R. Mechanisms of customer knowledge integration in the open innovation process: Health-tech case. Meas. Bus. Excell. 2019, 23, 136–148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Orlikowski, W.J.; Scott, S.V. Sociomateriality: Challenging the separation of technology, work and organization. Acad. Manag. Ann. 2008, 2, 433–474. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kallinikos, J. Governing through Technology: Information Artefacts and Social Practice; Palgrave Macmillan: Basingstoke, UK, 2011. [Google Scholar]
- Yin, M.; Li, J. How market orientation affects open innovation? Exploring the role of information and communication technology capability. Eur. J. Innov. Manag. 2023. ahead of print. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wright, S.; Street, J. Democracy, deliberation and design: The case of on-line discussion forums. New Media Soc. 2007, 9, 849–869. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dhillon, G.S.; Cacleira, M.; Wegner, M.R. Intentionality and power interplay in IS implementation: The case of an asset management firm. J. Strateg. Inf. Syst. 2011, 20, 438–448. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Simeonova, B.; Galliers, R.D.; Karanasions, S. Strategic information systems and organizational power dynamics. In Strategic Information Management. Theory and Practice; Galliers, R.D., Leider, D.E., Simeonova, B., Eds.; Routledge: New York, NY, USA, 2020; pp. 221–237. [Google Scholar]
- Deichmann, D.; van den Ende, J. Rising from failure and learning from success: The role of past experiences in radical initiative taking. Organ. Sci. 2014, 25, 670–690. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tsai, C.; Ahn, J.M. How do institutional effects shape open innovation adoption? Technol. Anal. Strateg. Manag. 2023. ahead of print. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pirkkalainen, H.; Pawlowski, J.M.; Bick, M.; Tannhäuser, A. Engaging in knowledge exchange: The instrumental psychological ownership in open innovation communities. Int. J. Inf. Manag. 2018, 38, 277–287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Salter, A.; Crisuolo, P.; Ter Wal, A.L.J. Coping with open innovation: Responding to the challenges of external engagement in R&D. Calif. Manag. Rev. 2014, 56, 77–94. [Google Scholar]
- Barham, H.; Dabic, M.; Tugrul, D.; Shifrer, D. The role of management support for the implementation of open innovation practices in firms. Technol. Soc. 2020, 63, 101282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Adler, P.S.; Kwon, S. Social capital: Prospects for a new concept. Acad. Manag. Rev. 2002, 27, 17–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bourdieu, P. The forms of capital. In Handbook of Theory and Research for the Sociology of Education; Richardson, J.G., Ed.; Greenwood: New York, NY, USA, 1985; pp. 241–258. [Google Scholar]
- Lin, N. Social Capital. A Theory of Social Structure and Action; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 2001. [Google Scholar]
- Huizingh, E.K.R.E. Open innovation: State of the art and future perspectives. Technovation 2011, 31, 2–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Malik, K.; Wei, J. How external partnering enhances innovation: Evidence from Chinese technology-based SMEs. Technol. Anal. Strateg. Manag. 2011, 23, 401–413. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Porter, M.E. Completive Advantage: Creating and Sustaining Superior Performance; The Free Press: New York, NY, USA, 1998. [Google Scholar]
- Grant, R.M. The resource e-based theory of competitive advantage: Implications for strategy formulation. Calif. Manag. Rev. 1991, 33, 3–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wright, P.; Kroll, M.; Pray, B.; Lado, A. Strategic orientations, competitive advantage, and business performance. J. Bus. Res. 1995, 33, 143–151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chesbrough, H.W.; Appleyard, M.M. Open innovation and strategy. Calif. Manag. Rev. 2007, 50, 57–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cheng, C.C.J.; Huizingh, E.K.R.E. When is open innovation beneficial? The role of strategic orientation. J. Prod. Innov. Manag. 2014, 31, 1235–1253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Crema, M.; Verbano, C.; Venturini, K. Linking strategy with open innovation and performance in SMEs. Meas. Bus. Excell. 2014, 18, 14–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tafti, F.F.; Abdolvand, N.; Harandi, S.R. A strategic alignment model for collaborative open innovation networks. Int. J. Bus. Innov. Res. 2019, 19, 1–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gatignon, H.; Xuereb, J.-M. Strategic orientation of the firm and new product performance. J. Mark. Res. 1997, 34, 77–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Covin, J.G.; Miles, M. Corporate entrepreneurship and the pursuit of competitive advantage. Entrep. Theory Pract. 1999, 23, 47–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Heinerth, C.; Keinz, P.; Lettl, C. Exploring the nature and implementation process of user-centric business models. Long Range Plan. 2011, 44, 344–374. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Von Hippel, E. Democratizing Innovation; MIT Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2005. [Google Scholar]
- Bogers, M.; Chesbrough, H.; Heaton, S.; Teece, D.J. Strategic management of open innovation: A dynamic capabilities perspective. Calif. Manag. Rev. 2019, 62, 77–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kim, N.K.; Ahn, J.M. What facilitates external knowledge utilisation in SMEs?—An optimal configuration between openness intensity and organisational moderators. Ind. Innov. 2020, 27, 210–234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yun, J.J.; Zhao, X.; Jung, K.; Yigitcanlar, T. The culture of open innovation dynamics. Sustainability 2020, 12, 5076. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cohen, W.M.; Levinthal, D.A. Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. Adm. Sci. Q. 1990, 35, 128–152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tsoukas, H. The firm as a distributed knowledge system: A constructionist approach. Strateg. Manag. J. 1996, 17, 11–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Barjak, F.; Heimsch, F. Understanding the relationship between organizational culture and inbound open innovation. Eur. J. Innov. Manag. 2023, 26, 773–797. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Naqshbandi, M.M.; Tabche, I.; Choudhary, N. Managing open innovation: The roles of empowering leadership and employee involvement climate. Manag. Decis. 2019, 57, 703–723. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Urbinati, A.; Landoni, P.; Cococcioni, F.; De Giudici, L. Stakeholder management in open innovation projects: A multiple case study analysis. Eur. J. Innov. Manag. 2021, 24, 1595–1624. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Karacapilidis, N. Integrating New Information and Communication Technologies in a Group Decision Support System. Int. Trans. Oper. Res. 2000, 7, 487–507. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Factor | Description | Variable | Explanation |
---|---|---|---|
INTROSPECT | Introspective orientation | INTROS-1 | Good innovative ideas stem from organisation’s incumbent managers and employees |
INTROS-2 | Organisational change initiatives stem from incumbent managers and employees | ||
EXTROS | Extrospective orientation | EXTROS | Good innovative ideas may stem from everywhere |
COMPOST | Cost as source of competitive advantage | COMPCOST | Cost is the most important determinant of competitive advantage |
COMPAD-INNOV | Innovation as source of competitive advantage | COMPIN-1 | Cost is the most important determinant of competitive advantage |
COMPIN-2 | Innovation-supported business models create new markets | ||
ISDIALOG | IS supporting dialogic cooperation | DIALGIS-1 | IS enabling two way flow of improvement ideas, designs and solutions |
DIALGIS-2 | IS supporting the “competition” of stake holders ideas and propositions | ||
DIALGIS-3 | IS supporting cooperation of stakeholders’ ideas and synthesis ideas and solutions | ||
DIALGIS-4 | IS supporting the cooperation of external and internal organizational stakeholders | ||
DIALGIS-5 | IS should integrate social media conversations in business processes | ||
ISDIALEC-VAR1,2,3 | IS supporting dialectic cooperation | ISDIALEC- VAR1 | IS allowing the storage of stakeholders’ ideas |
ISDIALEC- VAR2 | IS allowing the documentation and substantiation of own ideas and suggestions | ||
ISDIALEC- VAR3 | IS clearly indicating the “owners” of ideas and suggestions | ||
PASTINVOI | Involvement in OI initiatives in the past | PSTINVOI-1 | Involvement in other organisations’ OI initiatives in the past |
PSTINVOI-2 | Participation in other organisations’ open new product development processes | ||
PSTINVOI-3 | Participation in other organisations’ open process improvement efforts | ||
PSTINVOI-4 | Participation in other organisations’ open distribution improvement efforts | ||
PSTINVOI-5 | Participation in other organisations’ open marketing improvement efforts |
N = 150 | ||
---|---|---|
Sector | n | % |
Light industry incl. food and beverages | 51 | 34.0 |
Heavy industry and construction | 25 | 16.7 |
Services | 47 | 31.3 |
Commerce and trade | 27 | 18.0 |
Sector | INTROSPECT | COMPAD- INNOV | ISDIALOG | PASTINVOI | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin Measure of Sampling Adequacy | 0.630 | 0.650 | 0.807 | 0.814 | |
Bartlett’s Test of Sphericity | Approx. Chi-Square | 23.361 | 32.979 | 173.563 | 303.106 |
df | 1.000 | 1.000 | 10.000 | 10.000 | |
Sig. | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Factors/Variables | Communalities | Total Variance Explained | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Initial Eigenvalues | Extraction Sums of Squared Loadings | |||||||
Initial | Extraction | Total | % of Variance | Cumulative % | Total | % of Variance | Cumulative % | |
INTROSPECT | ||||||||
INTROS-1 | 1.000 | 0.691 | 1.383 | 69.136 | 69.136 | 1.383 | 69.136 | 69.136 |
INTROS-2 | 1.000 | 0.691 | 0.617 | 30.864 | 100.000 | |||
COMPADINNOV | ||||||||
COMPADIN-1 | 1.000 | 0.724 | 1.448 | 72.381 | 72.381 | 1.448 | 72.381 | 72.381 |
COMPADIN-2 | 1.000 | 0.724 | 0.552 | 27.619 | 100.000 | |||
ISDIALOG | ||||||||
DIALGIS-1 | 1.000 | 0.633 | 2.620 | 52.398 | 52.398 | 2.620 | 52.398 | 52.398 |
DIALGIS-2 | 1.000 | 0.526 | 0.765 | 15.298 | 67.695 | |||
DIALGIS-3 | 1.000 | 0.549 | 0.597 | 11.930 | 79.625 | |||
DIALGIS-4 | 1.000 | 0.477 | 0.569 | 11.388 | 91.013 | |||
DIALGIS-5 | 1.000 | 0.435 | 0.449 | 8.987 | 100.000 | |||
PASTINVOI | ||||||||
PSTINVOI-1 | 1.000 | 0.411 | 3.048 | 60.969 | 60.969 | 3.048 | 60.969 | 60.969 |
PSTINVOI-2 | 1.000 | 0.573 | 0.755 | 15.104 | 76.073 | |||
PSTINVOI-3 | 1.000 | 0.780 | 0.531 | 10.615 | 86.688 | |||
PSTINVOI-4 | 1.000 | 0.676 | 0.419 | 8.374 | 95.062 | |||
PSTINVOI-5 | 1.000 | 0.609 | 0.247 | 4.938 | 100.000 |
Test Statistics a,b Hypothesis | H1A | H1B | H2B | H3A | H3B | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
INTROSP | EXTROS | ||||||
Kruskal–Wallis H | 10.281 | 13.455 | |||||
df | 4 | 4 | |||||
Asymp. Sig. | 0.038 | 0.009 | |||||
a. Kruskal–Wallis Test | |||||||
b. Grouping Variable: COMPCOST, COMPADINNOV | |||||||
Correlations | |||||||
COMPCOST/ INTROSP | COMPADINNOV/ EXTROS | COMPADINNOV/ ISDIALOG | PASTINVOLV/ ISDIALEC-VAR1,2,3 | PASTINVOI/ ISDIALOG | |||
Spearman’s rho | 0.185 * | 0.247 * | 0.228 * | 0.100 | 0.102 | −0.037 | 0.163 * |
Sig. (2-tailed) | 0.035 | 0.021 | 0.005 | 0.222 | 0.213 | 0.655 | 0.047 |
N | 150 | ||||||
* Correlation is significant at the 0.05 level (2-tailed). | * Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed) | * Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed) | Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed) | * Correlation is significant at the 0.05 level (2-tailed) |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2023 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Adamides, E.; Karacapilidis, N.; Konstantinopoulos, K.; Kournetas, G. Dialogic and Dialectic Cooperation for Knowledge Creation in IS-Mediated Open Innovation. Knowledge 2023, 3, 525-542. https://doi.org/10.3390/knowledge3040034
Adamides E, Karacapilidis N, Konstantinopoulos K, Kournetas G. Dialogic and Dialectic Cooperation for Knowledge Creation in IS-Mediated Open Innovation. Knowledge. 2023; 3(4):525-542. https://doi.org/10.3390/knowledge3040034
Chicago/Turabian StyleAdamides, Emmanuel, Nikos Karacapilidis, Konstantinos Konstantinopoulos, and Georgios Kournetas. 2023. "Dialogic and Dialectic Cooperation for Knowledge Creation in IS-Mediated Open Innovation" Knowledge 3, no. 4: 525-542. https://doi.org/10.3390/knowledge3040034