Next Article in Journal
Thermodynamically Consistent Evolution Equations in Continuum Mechanics
Previous Article in Journal
Comment on Vatsala et al. Analysis of Sequential Caputo Fractional Differential Equations versus Non-Sequential Caputo Fractional Differential Equations with Applications. Foundations 2022, 2, 1129–1142
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Reply

Reply to Kiskinov et al. Comment on “Vatsala et al. Analysis of Sequential Caputo Fractional Differential Equations versus Non-Sequential Caputo Fractional Differential Equations with Applications. Foundations 2022, 2, 1129–1142”

by
Aghalaya S. Vatsala
1,*,
Govinda Pageni
2 and
V. Anthony Vijesh
3
1
Department of Mathematics, University of Louisiana at Lafayette, Lafayette, LA 70504, USA
2
Department of Mathematics, FSU Panama City Campus, Panama City, FL 32405, USA
3
Department of Mathematics, Indian Institute of Technology, Indore 453552, India
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Foundations 2024, 4(4), 491-493; https://doi.org/10.3390/foundations4040032
Submission received: 24 September 2024 / Accepted: 26 September 2024 / Published: 30 September 2024
(This article belongs to the Section Mathematical Sciences)
In our article [1], we are not trying to provide a counter-example to Theorems 1–3 of [2]. In fact, Theorem 1 is Theorem 2.2 of [3] (p. 93). In order to solve a Caputo fractional differential equation of order q, where 0 < q < 1 , we do not require the solution to be a C 1 function on the interval [ a , b ] . It is enough that the solution is a C q function, which essentially means the Caputo q t h order derivative exists on the needed interval.
Here, we provide the following definitions of left and right Caputo fractional derivatives for clarity.
Definition 1.
The Caputo (left-sided) fractional derivative of f ( t ) of order α, when n 1 < α < n , is given by equation
D a + α c f ( t ) = 1 Γ ( n α ) a t ( t s ) n α 1 f ( n ) ( s ) d s , t > a ,
and the (right-sided) fractional derivative is given by
D b α c f ( t ) = ( 1 ) n Γ ( n α ) t b ( s t ) n α 1 f ( n ) ( s ) d s , t < b ,
where f ( n ) ( t ) = d n ( f ) d t n .
In this work, we use Caputo fractional derivatives of order q, where 0 < q < 1 .
Remark 1.
In order for Theorem 2.2 of [2], (p. 93) to hold true, the Caputo left fractional derivative can be computed when the function can be expressed as a function of ( t a ) . Then, for the same function, the Caputo right fractional derivative has to be computed as a function of ( b t ) . Furthermore, if f C 1 [ a , b ] , then part (a) and (b) of Theorem 2.2 of [2] holds true.
However, it is to be noted that, from Theorem 2.2 of [3], both the Caputo left derivative and the Caputo right derivative have been defined to yield the integer derivative result q n as a special case. In particular, when 0 < q < 1 , then q 1 yields the solution of the first order differential equations.
Remark 2.
Observe that the solution of the Caputo fractional differential equation of order α is not a C n solution on [ a , b ] , when ( n 1 ) < α < n . See Equation (4.1.62) of [3], which is the solution of an α t h -order Caputo fractional differential equation when n 1 < α < n .
In short, when we are seeking the solution of a left Caputo fractional differential equation of order q, where 0 < q < 1 , the solution is not C 1 on ( a , b ] . Similarly, when we are seeking the solution of a right Caputo fractional differential equation of order q, where 0 < q < 1 , the solution is not C 1 on [ a , b ) .
The next comment is about the equivalence of the Caputo left derivative and Caputo right derivative of a function at any point on the interval ( a , b ) .
Consider the linear left Caputo fractional differential equation
D a + q c u = λ u , a < t < b , u ( a ) = u a .
Then, the solution of this left Caputo fractional differential equation is given by
u l ( t ) = u a E q , 1 ( λ ( t a ) q ) = k = 0 ( λ ( t a ) q ) k Γ ( q k + 1 ) .
Now, let us consider the right Caputo fractional differential equation,
D b q c u = λ u , a < t < b , u ( b ) = u a ,
It is easy to check that the solution of this right Caputo fractional differential equation is
u r ( t ) = u a E q , 1 ( λ ( b t ) q ) = k = 0 ( λ ( b t ) q ) k Γ ( q k + 1 ) .
Although the above solutions are solutions of Caputo fractional initial value problems, we want to show the equivalence of the left and right Caputo derivative of u l and u r at any point on ( a , b ) . Observe that the two solutions are equal at t = a + b 2 . Now, we claim that the two solutions are equal for any t in ( a , b ) , say t = t 1 . Then, we need to substitute t 1 = a + α in the left Caputo fractional derivative solution and t 1 = b α in the right Caputo fractional derivative solution. Then, it is easy to check that the two solutions are one and the same for any t 1 on ( a , b ) when α ( 0 , ( b a ) ] . If α = 0 , then u l ( a ) = u a = u r ( b ) .
As an example, consider a = 1 , b = 2 , and t 1 = 1.25 ; then, in this case, α = 0.25 . Then, the above left and right solution can be written as
u l ( 1 + 0.25 ) = u a E q , 1 ( λ ( 0.25 ) q ) = k = 0 ( λ ( 0.25 ) q ) k Γ ( q k + 1 ) ,
u r ( 2 0.25 ) = u a E q , 1 ( λ ( 0.25 ) q ) = k = 0 ( λ ( 0.25 ) q ) k Γ ( q k + 1 ) .
Next, we consider a few examples to demonstrates that Caputo fractional derivative of order q, where 0 < q < 1 exists, even if it is not a C 1 function.
Let
f ( t ) = ( t a ) ω .
It is easy to see that the left Caputo fractional derivative of order q is
D a + q c ( t a ) ω = Γ ( ω + 1 ) ( t a ) ( ω q ) Γ ( ω q + 1 ) .
Similarly, the right Caputo fractional derivative of ( b t ) ω is
D b q c ( b t ) ω = Γ ( ω + 1 ) ( b t ) ( ω q ) Γ ( ω q + 1 ) .
Observe that f ( t ) = ( t a ) ω is not C 1 at t = a , and f ( t ) = ( b t ) ω , is not C 1 at t = b , when ω < 1 . However, the Caputo left fractional derivative of ( t a ) ω exists on [ a , b ] and zero at t = a . Similarly, the Caputo right fractional derivative of ( b t ) ω exists on [ a , b ] and zero at t = b . This satisfies part (a) of Theorem 2.2 of [3]. If ω = 1 , then part (a) of Theorem 2 of [3] holds true.
If ω = 1 , then (4) and (5) become
D a + q c ( t a ) = ( t a ) ( 1 q ) Γ ( 2 q ) ,
and
D b q c ( b t ) = ( b t ) ( 1 q ) Γ ( 2 q ) .
If q = 1 , then the left derivative equals f ( t ) = 1 and the right derivative equals ( f ( t ) ) = 1 . This validates Remark 1, as well as Theorem 2.2 of [3]
In particular, if ω = q , then
D a + q c ( t a ) q = Γ ( q + 1 ) = D b q c ( b t ) q .
It appears that the authors of [2] have computed the Caputo derivative of
f ( x ) = ( x a ) q ( b x ) q ,
at a specific point numerically by substituting the x 1 value in place of the s value in the integral. The integral of this function will not be in closed form.
In fact, for any function f = f ( t a ) , where f C q on ( a , b ] , we have
D a + q c ( f ( t a ) ) | t = a + α = F ( t a ) | t = a + α = F ( α ) ,
and
D b q c ( f ( b t ) ) | t = b α = F ( b t ) | t = b α = F ( α ) .
This proves that
D a + q c ( f ( t a ) ) | t = a + α = D b q c ( f ( b t ) ) | t = b α = F ( α ) .
This is our claim in [1].
The reference [4] is devoted to Caputo fractional differential equations.
Conclusions: We conjecture that this result can be extended to Caputo sequential fractional derivative of order n q , which is sequential of order q. Note that the integer derivative is sequential.

References

  1. Vatsala, A.S.; Pageni, G.; Vijesh, V.A. Analysis of Sequential Caputo Fractional Differential Equations versus Non-Sequential Caputo Fractional Differential Equations with Applications. Foundations 2022, 2, 1129–1142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Kiskinov, H.; Petkova, M.; Zahariev, A. Comment on Vatsala et al. Analysis of sequential Caputo fractional differential equations versus non-sequential Caputo fractional differential equations with applications. Foundations 2022, 2, 1129–1142. Foundations 2024, 4, 488–490. [Google Scholar]
  3. Kilbas, A.A.; Srivsatava, H.M.; Trujillo, J.J. Theory and Apllications of Fractional Differential Equations; North Holland: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2006. [Google Scholar]
  4. Diethelm, K. The Analysis of Fractional Differential Equations; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2004. [Google Scholar]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Vatsala, A.S.; Pageni, G.; Vijesh, V.A. Reply to Kiskinov et al. Comment on “Vatsala et al. Analysis of Sequential Caputo Fractional Differential Equations versus Non-Sequential Caputo Fractional Differential Equations with Applications. Foundations 2022, 2, 1129–1142”. Foundations 2024, 4, 491-493. https://doi.org/10.3390/foundations4040032

AMA Style

Vatsala AS, Pageni G, Vijesh VA. Reply to Kiskinov et al. Comment on “Vatsala et al. Analysis of Sequential Caputo Fractional Differential Equations versus Non-Sequential Caputo Fractional Differential Equations with Applications. Foundations 2022, 2, 1129–1142”. Foundations. 2024; 4(4):491-493. https://doi.org/10.3390/foundations4040032

Chicago/Turabian Style

Vatsala, Aghalaya S., Govinda Pageni, and V. Anthony Vijesh. 2024. "Reply to Kiskinov et al. Comment on “Vatsala et al. Analysis of Sequential Caputo Fractional Differential Equations versus Non-Sequential Caputo Fractional Differential Equations with Applications. Foundations 2022, 2, 1129–1142”" Foundations 4, no. 4: 491-493. https://doi.org/10.3390/foundations4040032

APA Style

Vatsala, A. S., Pageni, G., & Vijesh, V. A. (2024). Reply to Kiskinov et al. Comment on “Vatsala et al. Analysis of Sequential Caputo Fractional Differential Equations versus Non-Sequential Caputo Fractional Differential Equations with Applications. Foundations 2022, 2, 1129–1142”. Foundations, 4(4), 491-493. https://doi.org/10.3390/foundations4040032

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop