Next Article in Journal
Climate Trends and Average Increase in Aspen Forests’ Carbon Stock in Siberia According to Forest Inventory Data
Previous Article in Journal
Standardization of Extraction of DNA from Silica-Gel Dried Leaf Sample of Garcinia Indica (Thouars) Choisy
 
 
Please note that, as of 4 December 2024, Environmental Sciences Proceedings has been renamed to Environmental and Earth Sciences Proceedings and is now published here.
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Proceeding Paper

Spatial Dynamics of Tree Stand Disturbance under Siberian Silk Moth (Dendrolimus sibiricus) Impact in Central Siberia in 2016–2020 Based on Remote Sensing Data †

by
Evgenii I. Ponomarev
1,2,*,
Andrey A. Goroshko
1,
Evgeny G. Shvetsov
2,
Nikita D. Yakimov
2,
Pavel D. Tretyakov
1,2,
Svetlana M. Sultson
1 and
Pavel V. Mikhaylov
1
1
Scientific Laboratory of Forest Health, Reshetnev Siberian State University of Science and Technology, 31, Krasnoyarskii Rabochii Prospekt, Krasnoyarsk 660037, Russia
2
Federal Research Center “Krasnoyarsk Science Center, Siberian Branch, Russian Academy of Sciences”, 50, Akademgorodok, Krasnoyarsk 660036, Russia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Presented at the 3rd International Electronic Conference on Forests—Exploring New Discoveries and New Directions in Forests, 15–31 October 2022; Available online: https://iecf2022.sciforum.net/.
Environ. Sci. Proc. 2022, 22(1), 4; https://doi.org/10.3390/IECF2022-13056
Published: 15 October 2022

Abstract

:
In this study, we have analyzed the spatial dynamics of the forests disturbed by Siberian Silk Moth (Dendrolimus sibiricus Tschetverikov (Lepidoptera: Lasiocampidae)) in Central Siberia and obtained model equations that fit these dynamics. We considered three sites that experienced silk moth outbreaks in 1993–1996, 2015–2018, and 2018–2020 and used satellite data (NOAA/AVHRR, Terra/MODIS, Landsat/ETM/OLI), field data, a digital elevation model, and maps of predominant forests. Silk moth-disturbed areas were classified using NDVI, which was calculated for each 15-day period during the growing season (April–September). Time series of disturbed forest areas were obtained for three sites located in the Krasnoyarsk region (Central Siberia, Russia). Total damaged areas for these sites were 41, 430, and 470 thousand hectares. We obtained formalized descriptions for the temporal dynamics of the disturbed area.

1. Introduction

An analysis of the development of pest outbreak in the forests for each specific case requires knowledge of the entire complex of parameters that determine the location, growth rate, and dynamics of the affected area. It is known from the literature that populations of forest insects can be well described by parametric models that predict the population size under various environmental conditions [1]. At the same time, any numerical predictions based on parametric theoretical models must be validated on the basis of field data, which makes it possible to determine the list of model inputs, parameters, and constants [2,3,4,5]. The number of field measurements is usually limited and not always sufficient to calibrate the models that describe the dynamics of the process. When studying insect-disturbed areas, it is also important to study the issue of outbreak locations relative to the physiographic, forest, and meteorological conditions (humidity deficit, precipitation regimes, winter and summer temperature regimes, etc.) of the region. This also requires consideration of each individual case [5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12].
Regarding this issue, the studies of the dynamics of disturbed areas that usually have long-term scars on satellite images are of particular interest. It has been shown [13,14] that after the impact of disturbance factors on forest stands, in particular after the Siberian silk moth outbreak, changes in the spectral characteristics of damaged areas occur [15,16,17]. This determines the prospects of using remote sensing data, both for analyzing the forest mortality caused by the complex effects of forest fires, pest outbreaks, etc. [18,19,20,21] and to monitor the dynamics of the spatial distribution of pests. Satellite data also make it possible to perform long-term monitoring of the state of damaged forest stands, allowing one to classify the disturbance degree [22]. Such an approach is now commonly used and widespread in geospatial research in various regions [5,11,23,24].
The spatio-temporal model of the silk moth outbreak development allows estimating the growth rate of the total area and the main tactical elements of the disturbed area. The results of such studies are the basis for further analysis of the parameters that determine the predominant directions of outbreak propagation under conditions of local relief, aspect, and forest growing conditions.
We investigated the following issues: (a) the rate of pest outbreak development in dark coniferous forests of Siberia, (b) modeling the rate of disturbed area increase.
The obtained solutions make it possible to have a predictive model for the formation and development of the disturbed forest zone, which is necessary at the stage of planning appropriate preventive measures and developing a general strategy for minimizing the consequences under the conditions of repeated outbreaks of Siberian silk moth in the studied areas.

2. Material and Methods

The studies were performed for two sites of dark coniferous taiga in the Krasnoyarsk Region, Siberia, Russia: (1) 58°30′–60° N, 88°30′–92° E, in the Yenisei region (EnP), with a total area of 4.2 million ha; and (2) 54°45′–55°05′ N, 95°20′–99°10′ E in the Irbei district (IrP), with a total area of 904 thousand ha, where Siberian Silk Moth (Dendrolimus sibiricus Tschetverikov (Lepidoptera: Lasiocampidae)) outbreaks were observed between 2016 and 2020. Figure 1 shows forest areas disturbed by the silk moth according to the moderate spatial resolution data for EnP and IrP.
The initial data on the areas of disturbed forest zones detected by their spectral features were obtained from Landsat, Sentinel-2 data of moderate spatial resolution (15–30 m) with a frequency of 1–3 months and from Terra/Aqua MODIS data of low spatial resolution (250 m, 1000 m) with a frequency of 14–28 days (MOD13Q1/ MYD13Q1). Thus, the temporal resolution of satellite data for the region of interest was at least once a month in the case of moderate resolution data and two times a month for the data of low spatial resolution. Time series of disturbed forest areas were obtained for two sites located in the Krasnoyarsk region (Central Siberia, Russia).
A vegetation cover map was obtained using “Vega-service” (Database of the Institute of Space Research of the Russian Academy of Sciences, IKI RAS, Moscow, http://pro-vega.ru/maps/, accessed on 21 September 2022) [25].

3. Results and Discussion

Using the previously described approaches, the dynamics of area disturbed by silk moth in the EnP and IrP plots was calculated. The duration of the outbreak in the EnP was 4 years, while for the IrP it was 3 years. The final disturbed areas were 428.6 and 41.5 thousand ha, respectively (Figure 2).
The temporal dynamics of the total disturbed area (Figure 2) can be approximated using the function of normal distribution as follows:
f ( x ) = 1 σ 2 π e ( x x ) 2 2 σ 2
where x is expected value and σ is standard deviation.
Analyzing the general patterns of the development of the silk moth-disturbed area, two phases can be distinguished that reflect the rate of the geospatial spread of the disturbed:
(a)
a phase of increasing rate of disturbed area growth, which is limited by the characteristic of time, Tphase, unique for each case, which is determined by the change of the pattern of the disturbed area growth;
(b)
the phase of the decreasing rate of area growth and further “saturation” (the maximum value of the disturbed area for the given case).
In the case of the IrP, the value of Tphase for the time series was 11 months, the initial area of the disturbed forest was 109.4 ha, and the approximating maximum of the area (asymptote) was 35,000 ha (Figure 2).
The type of distribution allows extrapolation of the disturbed area, S = S(t), for each phase as an independent function. The general type of the model can be formulated as:
S   ( t ) = { S ph 1 = A   e x p ( B t + C ) + D ,   for   t < T phase S ph 2 = E   l n ( F t + G ) + H ,   for   t T phase
and the corresponding set of coefficients (Ki), which determine the amplitude of the initial phase of the disturbed zone development (A), the rate of area growth (B, F), the state of the disturbed zone at the time of the beginning of logarithmic growth (E), and additive terms (C, D, G, H). Here, the phase of the increasing rate of the area growth (exponential increase) is designated Sph1, and the phase of the decreasing rate of the area growth and further saturation is Sph2.
The solution (Figure 3a) obtained based on the model approximations (2), agrees well with the experimental dataset and has a high level of correlation (r~0.99) (Table 1).
A silk moth outbreak in the Yenisei region in 2015–2018 was characterized by the spatial scale of the disturbed area that limited the use of satellite data of moderate spatial resolutions (Landsat, Sentinel-2). Thus, the Terra/MODIS data were a unique data source on the dynamics of the silk moth outbreak development.
In the first approximation, the solution for the dynamics of the disturbed area contains a significant discrepancy for the stage of exponential growth (Figure 3 “I”) with the Tphase 1 = 111 weeks, because the area of the disturbed area on the initial stages of 2015 and 2016 was significantly lower than the final values delineated using satellite data from 2017–2018.
With all the assumptions of the first approximation of the model, the obtained solution (Table 1) for the disturbed area dynamics is in good agreement with the experimental dataset and has a high level of correlation (r~0.97), which is shown in the correlation field plot (Figure 3c,f).
The restrictions imposed on the spatial advancement of the disturbed area are associated with natural boundaries (such as non-forested areas, ridges, valley complexes, rivers, etc.), the heterogeneity of vegetation and forest composition, and the time of the outbreak origination, as well as the spatial and temporal peculiarities of the origination of secondary (multiple) locations of pest outbreaks, anisotropy of physical and geographical characteristics, microrelief, and local conditions. Determination of the directions of the predominant advancement of the disturbed area requires a comprehensive analysis of all factors listed above [5,10,11,12,23,24]. In addition, these indicators can be input conditions that regulate the rate of spread of the disturbed area and individual tactical elements, as well as the degree of damage to forest stands [22].

4. Conclusions

The results obtained represent the formalized descriptions of the temporal distribution of the disturbed area consistent with data series based on satellite data for silk moth outbreaks in the EnP (in 2015–2018) and IrP (in 2018–2020) regions of the Krasnoyarsk region, Siberia, Russia.
We obtained formalized descriptions for the temporal dynamics of disturbed area. Coefficients for the model solution were optimized using the Lagrange multiplier method and non-linear generalized downgrading gradient method. It is shown that the systems of empirical solutions adequately (R2~0.97) fit field data and can be used to simulate silk moth outbreaks under similar conditions. We have tested model regression equations for predicting the azimuthal spread of damaged areas with a confidence level of r = 0.60–0.68.
It was shown that it is necessary to additionally identify and analyze inter-seasonal periods of disturbed area dynamics to improve the accuracy of the model. Individual seasons should be considered as independent sub-periods, which must be accompanied by refined coefficients of model equations when forming a general solution. A set of obtained solutions reflects the probable range of silk moth outbreak scenarios.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, E.I.P.; methodology, E.I.P., N.D.Y., and E.G.S.; software, E.P, N.D.Y., E.G.S., and A.A.G.; validation, E.I.P., N.D.Y., S.M.S., P.V.M., and A.A.G.; formal analysis, E.I.P., E.G.S., and A.A.G.; investigation, E.I.P., N.D.Y., and P.D.T.; resources, E.I.P., S.M.S., and P.V.M.; data curation, E.I.P. and S.M.S.; writing—original draft preparation, E.I.P., N.D.Y., and E.G.S.; writing—review and editing, E.I.P. and E.G.S.; visualization, N.D.Y., A.A.G., and P.D.T.; supervision, E.I.P.; project administration, S.M.S.; funding acquisition, S.M.S. and P.V.M. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This study was supported by the Ministry of Education and Science of the Russian Federation (project “Fundamentals of forest protection from entomo- and fittings pests in Siberia” No. FEFE-2020-0014) and the subject of Project No. 0287-2021-0040 (KSC SB RAS).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Publicly available datasets were analyzed in this study. These data can be found here: http://pro-vega.ru/maps/ (accessed on 27 August 2022) and https://worldview.earthdata.nasa.gov/ (accessed on 27 August 2022).

Acknowledgments

The satellite data-receiving equipment used was provided by the Center of Collective Usage of Federal Research Center “Krasnoyarsk Science Center of the Siberian Branch of Russian Academy of Sciences”, Krasnoyarsk, Russia.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Kovalev, A.V.; Ovchinnikova, T.M. Development of simulation models for dynamics of forest pest numbers. Contemp. Probl. Ecol. 2010, 2, 27–35. [Google Scholar]
  2. Morris, R.F. The development of predictive equations for the spruce budworm based on keyfactor analysis. Dyn. Epidemic Spruce Budworm Popul. Mem. Entomol. Soc. Can. 1963, 95, 116–129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Mawby, W.D.; Hain, P.P.; Doggett, C.A. Endemic and epidemic populations of southern pine beetle: Implications of the two-phase model for forest managers. For. Sci. 1989, 35, 1075–1087. [Google Scholar]
  4. Iskhakov, T.R.; Sukhovol’skii, V.G.; Ovchinnikova, T.M.; Tarasova, O.V. A population and energy model of a forest insect outbreak. Biophysics 2007, 52, 440–444. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Möykkynen, T.; Pukkala, T. Modelling of the spread of a potential invasive pest, the Siberian moth (Dendrolimus sibiricus) in Europe. For. Ecosyst. 2014, 1, 10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Mikhailov, J.Z.; Sumina, N.Y. Siberian moth Dendrolimus superans (Butler, 1877) and control of it in Irkutsk region. Bajk. Zool. J. 2012, 3, 25–29. (In Russia) [Google Scholar]
  7. Leontiev, D.F. Distribution and forecasting of the population of the Siberian silkmoth (scientific review). Intern. J. Appl. Fundam. Res. 2015, 11, 705–709. (In Russian) [Google Scholar]
  8. Pavlov, I.N.; Litovka, Y.A.; Golubev, D.V.; Astapenko, S.A.; Chromogin, P.V. New outbreak of Dendrolimus sibiricus tschetv. in Siberia (2012–2017): Monitoring, modeling and biological control. Contemp. Probl. Ecol. 2018, 11, 406–419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Lyamtsev, N.I. Assessment and forecast of Siberian moth mass propagation risks in the Krasnoyarsk krai forests. Izv. St.-Peterbg. Lesoteh. Akad. 2019, 228, 294–311. (In Russian) [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Sultson, S.M.; Goroshko, A.A.; Verkhovets, S.V.; Mikhaylov, P.V.; Ivanov, V.A.; Demidko, D.A.; Kulakov, S.S. Orographic Factors as a Predictor of the Spread of the Siberian Silk Moth Outbreak in the Mountainous Southern Taiga Forests of Siberia. Land 2021, 10, 115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Sultson, S.M.; Goroshko, A.A.; Mikhaylov, P.V.; Demidko, D.A.; Ponomarev, E.; Verkhovets, S.V. Improving the Monitoring System towards Early Detection and Prediction of the Siberian Moth Outbreaks in Eastern Siberia. Proceedings 2021, 68, 5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Kovalev, A.; Soukhovolsky, V. Analysis of Forest Stand Resistance to Insect Attack According to Remote Sensing Data. Forests 2021, 12, 1188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Fedotova, E.V.; Im, S.T.; Kharuk, V.I. Analysis of the spatial confinement of areas of taiga forests disturbed by the Siberian silk moth according to small-scale remote sensing data. Interexpo GEO-Sib. 2007, 2, 206–210. (In Russia) [Google Scholar]
  14. Im, S.T.; Fedotova, E.V.; Kharuk, V.I. Spectrodiametric satellite imagery in the analysis of the outbreak zone of mass reproduction of the Siberian silk moth. J. Sib. Fed. Univ. Eng. Technol. 2008, 1, 346–358. (In Russia) [Google Scholar]
  15. Wolfe, R.E.; Roy, D.P.; Vermote, E. MODIS Land Data Storage, Gridding, and Compositing Methodology: Level 2 Grid. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens. 1998, 36, 1324–1338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Didan, K.; Munoz, A.B.; Solano, R.; Huete, A. MODIS Vegetation Index User’s Guide Version 3.00, June 2015 (Collection 6). Available online: https://vip.arizona.edu/documents/MODIS/MODIS_VI_UsersGuide_June_2015_C6.pdf (accessed on 10 October 2022).
  17. Knyazeva, S.V.; Koroleva, N.V.; Eidlina, S.P.; Sochilova, E.N. Health of vegetation in the area of mass outbreaks of Siberian moth based on satellite data. Contemp. Probl. Ecol. 2019, 12, 743–752. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Kharuk, V.I.; Ranson, K.J.; Im, S.T. Siberian silkmoth outbreak pattern analysis based on SPOT VEGETATION data. Int. J. Remote Sens. 2009, 30, 2377–2388. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Bartalev, S.; Egorov, V.; Zharko, V.; Loupian, E.; Plotnikov, D.; Khvostikov, S.; Shabanov, N. Land Cover Mapping over Russia Using Earth Observation Data; Russian Academy of Sciences’ Space Research Institute: Moscow, Russia, 2016; p. 208. (In Russia) [Google Scholar]
  20. Kharuk, V.I.; Antamoshkina, O.A. Impact of Silkmoth Outbreak on Taiga Wildfires. Contemp. Probl. Ecol. 2017, 10, 556–562. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Bartalev, S.A.; Stytsenko, F.V. An assessment of the forest stands destruction by fires basedon the remote sensing data on a seasonal distribution of burnt areas. Contemp. Probl. Ecol. 2021, 2, 115–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Vaganov, E.A.; Shashkin, A.V.; Kharuk, V.I.; Khlebopros, R.G.; Sukhovolsky, V.G.; Gaevsky, N.A.; Degermendzhi, A.G.; Gubanov, V.G. Ecological Biophysics. Vol. 2. Biophysics of Land and Water Ecosystems; Gitelzon, I.I., Pechurkin, N.S., Eds.; Logos: Moscow, Russia, 2002; 360p, ISBN 5-94010-073-2. (In Russia) [Google Scholar]
  23. Kharuk, V.I.; Demidko, D.A.; Fedotova, E.V.; Dvinskaya, M.L.; Budnik, U.A. Spatial and temporal dynamics of Siberian silk moth large-scale outbreak in dark-needle coniferous tree stands in Altai. Contemp. Probl. Ecol. 2016, 9, 711–720. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Kharuk, V.I.; Im, S.T.; Soldatov, V.V. Siberian silkmoth outbreaks surpassed geoclimatic barrier in Siberian Mountains. J. Mt. Sci. 2020, 17, 1891–1900. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Loupian, E.A.; Bourtsev, M.A.; Proshin, A.A.; Kashnitskiy, A.V.; Balashov, I.V.; Bartalev, S.A.; Konstantinova, A.M.; Kobets, D.A.; Radchenko, M.V.; Tolpin, V.A.; et al. Usage Experience and Capabilities of the VEGA-Science System. Remote Sens. 2022, 14, 77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Abrams, M.; Crippen, R.; Fujisada, H. ASTER Global Digital Elevation Model (GDEM) and ASTER Global Water Body Dataset (ASTWBD). Remote Sens. 2020, 12, 1156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Overview of forests disturbed by silk moth, in (a) EnP for 2020; (b) in IrP for 2020.
Figure 1. Overview of forests disturbed by silk moth, in (a) EnP for 2020; (b) in IrP for 2020.
Environsciproc 22 00004 g001
Figure 2. The dynamics of area disturbed by silk moth in EnP (a) and in IrP (b).
Figure 2. The dynamics of area disturbed by silk moth in EnP (a) and in IrP (b).
Environsciproc 22 00004 g002
Figure 3. The dynamics of the area disturbed by silk moth for EnP в 2015–2018 гг. (a) and IrP в 2018–2020 гг. (d), ASTER GDEM [26] is shown as background. Model of the monthly distribution of the area disturbed by silk moth for EnP, which approximates the Terra/MODIS data with 14 days temporal resolution, where I corresponds to exponential growth (phase “I”) and II is the approximating of the final stage. For IrP (b), 1 is the experimental data, 2 is an approximation the maximum of the final area, 3 is the model solution for the phase of exponential area growth, and 4 is the model solution for the phase of decreasing rate of area growth (logarithmic approximation) and further saturation (e). Plot of the correlation field for experimental measurement data (based on satellite data) and model calculation (SModel) results for EnP (c) and for IrP (f).
Figure 3. The dynamics of the area disturbed by silk moth for EnP в 2015–2018 гг. (a) and IrP в 2018–2020 гг. (d), ASTER GDEM [26] is shown as background. Model of the monthly distribution of the area disturbed by silk moth for EnP, which approximates the Terra/MODIS data with 14 days temporal resolution, where I corresponds to exponential growth (phase “I”) and II is the approximating of the final stage. For IrP (b), 1 is the experimental data, 2 is an approximation the maximum of the final area, 3 is the model solution for the phase of exponential area growth, and 4 is the model solution for the phase of decreasing rate of area growth (logarithmic approximation) and further saturation (e). Plot of the correlation field for experimental measurement data (based on satellite data) and model calculation (SModel) results for EnP (c) and for IrP (f).
Environsciproc 22 00004 g003
Table 1. Coefficients of the equations for the model of disturbed zone growth.
Table 1. Coefficients of the equations for the model of disturbed zone growth.
IrP, 2018–2020
ModelModel Coefficients (2)
Phase I: Aexp(Bx + C) + DABCD
0.910.820.861.00
Phase II: E ln(Fx + G) + HEFGH
22,497.420.1870.07558.35
EnP, 2015–2018, Tphase = 111 weeks
ModelModel Coefficients (2)
Phase I: Aexp(Bx + C) + DABCD
0.9890.1000.9861.00
Phase II: E ln(Fx + G) + HEFGH
60.9030.0077.7040.101
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Ponomarev, E.I.; Goroshko, A.A.; Shvetsov, E.G.; Yakimov, N.D.; Tretyakov, P.D.; Sultson, S.M.; Mikhaylov, P.V. Spatial Dynamics of Tree Stand Disturbance under Siberian Silk Moth (Dendrolimus sibiricus) Impact in Central Siberia in 2016–2020 Based on Remote Sensing Data. Environ. Sci. Proc. 2022, 22, 4. https://doi.org/10.3390/IECF2022-13056

AMA Style

Ponomarev EI, Goroshko AA, Shvetsov EG, Yakimov ND, Tretyakov PD, Sultson SM, Mikhaylov PV. Spatial Dynamics of Tree Stand Disturbance under Siberian Silk Moth (Dendrolimus sibiricus) Impact in Central Siberia in 2016–2020 Based on Remote Sensing Data. Environmental Sciences Proceedings. 2022; 22(1):4. https://doi.org/10.3390/IECF2022-13056

Chicago/Turabian Style

Ponomarev, Evgenii I., Andrey A. Goroshko, Evgeny G. Shvetsov, Nikita D. Yakimov, Pavel D. Tretyakov, Svetlana M. Sultson, and Pavel V. Mikhaylov. 2022. "Spatial Dynamics of Tree Stand Disturbance under Siberian Silk Moth (Dendrolimus sibiricus) Impact in Central Siberia in 2016–2020 Based on Remote Sensing Data" Environmental Sciences Proceedings 22, no. 1: 4. https://doi.org/10.3390/IECF2022-13056

APA Style

Ponomarev, E. I., Goroshko, A. A., Shvetsov, E. G., Yakimov, N. D., Tretyakov, P. D., Sultson, S. M., & Mikhaylov, P. V. (2022). Spatial Dynamics of Tree Stand Disturbance under Siberian Silk Moth (Dendrolimus sibiricus) Impact in Central Siberia in 2016–2020 Based on Remote Sensing Data. Environmental Sciences Proceedings, 22(1), 4. https://doi.org/10.3390/IECF2022-13056

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop