Next Article in Journal
Statistical Correction of the Distribution of Solar Radiation, Estimated by the Heliosat Method for Cuba
Previous Article in Journal
An Introduction to Atmospheric Pollutant Dispersion Modelling
 
 
Please note that, as of 4 December 2024, Environmental Sciences Proceedings has been renamed to Environmental and Earth Sciences Proceedings and is now published here.
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Proceeding Paper

Particle Size Distribution from Municipal Solid Waste Burning over National Capital Territory, India †

1
Environmental Sciences and Biomedical Metrology Division, CSIR-National Physical Laboratory, Dr. K S Krishnan Road, New Delhi 110012, India
2
Academy of Scientific and Innovative Research (AcSIR), Ghaziabad 201002, India
3
Department of Civil Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology, Roorkee 247667, India
4
UK Centre for Ecology and Hydrology, Bush Estate, Penicuik EH26 0QB, UK
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Presented at the 5th International Electronic Conference on Atmospheric Sciences, 16–31 July 2022; Available online: https://ecas2022.sciforum.net.
Environ. Sci. Proc. 2022, 19(1), 26; https://doi.org/10.3390/ecas2022-12813
Published: 14 July 2022
(This article belongs to the Proceedings of The 5th International Electronic Conference on Atmospheric Sciences)

Abstract

:
Emission of particulate matter (PM) of different sizes from Municipal Solid Waste (MSW) burning may have an impact on air quality and human health of the National Capital Territory (NCT) of India, particularly during winter months. MSW samples were collected from three sanitary landfill sites in the NCT Delhi. Experiments were performed to mimic real world burning during different stages of sample combustion (ignition, flaming smoldering, smoldering and pyrolysis). We determined the emission factor for the number and mass concentration of particles of different sizes, ranging from 0.34 to 9.05 µm, for MSW burning. Present results confirm the assumption that MSW burning emits the maximum number concentration (No/cm3) of particles (90%) in the range < 1.0 µm, or fine-mode aerosol.

1. Introduction

Municipal Solid Waste (MSW) refers to domestic garbage generated from the kitchen and various domestic activities in household and commercial establishments. MSW comprises organic and inorganic materials such as kitchen and garden waste, plastics, paper, etc. Burning MSW is a potential source of particulate matter (PM) and various pollutants such as gases and toxins [1,2]. Out of the total municipal waste generated, a fraction of the waste is burnt at open places [2,3]. The particulates and other pollutants emitted from this activity cause degradation of air quality and contribute to global climate change. In addition, particulates, via short- and long-term exposure, contribute to various health impacts, including respiratory and cardiovascular disease, increased mortality and cancer [1,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14]. The present study investigates the emission of different particle sizes in the range 0.30 to 10 µm from MSW burning.

2. Materials and Methods

The National Capital Territory (NCT) (28°12′–28°63′ N, 75°50′–77°23′ E) comprises an area of 1484 km2 that is divided into 9 districts. As per the Census 2011, the total population of NCT was 16,753,235 (https://www.census2011.co.in/census/state/districtlist/delhi.html (accessed on 27 March 2020)). Dried MSW samples were collected from three landfill sites, namely, Bhlaswa (Site-I), Ghazipur (Site-II) and Okhla (Site-III), across the NCT (Figure 1). Samples were stored in zip lock bags and burnt under controlled laboratory conditions.
Burning experiments were performed at CSIR—National Physical Laboratory (CSIR NPL), New Delhi, India, using a combustion dilution chamber. Figure 1b gives the schematic diagram of the burning facility. A detailed description of the characteristics can be found in [15,16,17,18]. The sampling point was located above ground level. The first sampling flow was taken from the sampling point and directed to a particle diluter (TSI Model 3320) for diluting the samples at a ratio of 1:100. The diluted flow was directed to an aerosol spectrophotometer or Optical Particle Sizer (TSI Model 3330) for size distribution for the combustion experiment in controlled laboratory conditions.

3. Results and Discussion

Figure 2a–c show the evolution of the concentration (dilution ratio 1:100, reported values are after dilution) of differently sized particles over entire burning cycles, during the time from ignition to the smoldering stage (end of sampling) for the three sampling sites, namely, Bhlaswa (Site-I), Ghazipur (Site-II) and Okhla (Site-III), over the NCT of Delhi. The flaming period emitted a larger particle number concentration compared to ignition and smoldering. It was noticed that for Site-I, during the flaming phase, the particle number concentration in the size range 0.30 to 0.5 µm was around 900 # cm−3, whereas for the other size ranges it was two orders less. A similar pattern of variation in number concentration was observed at Site-II and Site-III. High emission of fine particulate may be associated with the breakdown of organic compounds of MSW, as MSW comprises organic and inorganic materials in its composition.
Figure 3a–c show the percentage emission distribution of particle number concentration for different sizes (dilution ratio 1:100, reported values are after dilution.) Particle concentration in the size range 0.37 to 1.0 µm averaged 70,927 ± 2909 # cm−3, particle number concentration for sizes 1.0 to 2.5 µm averaged 72,952 ± 2929 # cm−3 and particle number concentration for sizes 2.5 to 10 µm averaged 73,418 ± 2940 # cm−3. Particle emissions from the Site I sample were larger than from the other two sites.
Figure 4 shows the emission factor for particles of different size (dilution ratio 1:100, reported values are after dilution). Higher emission factors, e.g., 20.19 mg (kg fuel)−1, were recorded for the particle size range 2.5 to 10.0 µm, whereas the particle size range 0.37 to 1.0 µm recorded the lowest emission factor, i.e., 3.61 mg (kg fuel)−1. The sample from Site-III recorded a higher emission factor as compared with the other two sites.
The NCT of Delhi generated 10,981.3 TPD MSW, out of which 2–3% undergoes open burning. We estimate this MSW burning accounts for a total emission of 0.68 kg/day of PM1.0, 1.71 kg/day of PM2.5 and 4.41 kg/day of PM10.

4. Conclusions

The present study highlights that most of the fine particles (particle diameter up to 1.0 and 2.5 µm) from MSW burning are emitted during the flaming phase, with higher particle size concentration. Overall, the larger particles (i.e., above 2.5 µm) showed the largest mass-based emission factor. These emissions contribute to poor air quality and adverse human health impacts.

Author Contributions

R.A. and A.M. collected MSW samples over NCT of Delhi; R.A., S.A., L.Y., R.J. and A.M. designed and performed experimental work; R.A. analyzed data and led in drafting the manuscript; S.K.S., B.R.G. and E.N. assisted with data analysis, reviewing, proofreading and supervision; T.K.M. conceptualized the program and was involved in data analysis, reviewing, proofreading and overall supervision. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was financially supported by MoES and the Natural Environment Research Council, UK, (DelhiFlux, grant number NE/P016502/1) under the Air Pollution and Human Health (APHH)—India program.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The datasets developed during this study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Acknowledgments

The authors are thankful to the CSIR-NPL, New Delhi and Environmental Sciences and Biomedical Metrology Division (ES&BMD) and CSIR-NPL, New Delhi, for their encouragement.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Christian, T.J.; Yokelson, R.J.; Cárdenas, B.; Molina, L.T.; Engling, G.; Hsu, S.-C. Trace gas and particle emissions from domestic and industrial biofuel use and garbage burning in central Mexico. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 2010, 10, 565–584. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Kumari, K.; Kumar, S.; Rajagopal, V.; Khare, A.; Kumar, R. Emission from open burning of municipal solid waste in India. Environ. Technol. 2019, 40, 2201–2214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. US Environmental Protection Agency. PCBs in the United States: Industrial Use and Environmental Distribution; EPA 560/6-76-005; US Environmental Protection Agency: Washington, DC, USA, 1976.
  4. Hales, S.; Blakely, T.; Woodward, A. Air pollution and mortality in New Zealand: Cohort study. J. Epidemiol. Community Health 2012, 66, 468–473. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Raaschou-Nielsen, O.; Bak, H.; Sørensen, M.; Jensen, S.S.; Ketzel, M.; Hvidberg, M.; Schnohr, P.; Tjønneland, A.; Overvad, K.; Loft, S. Air Pollution from Traffic and Risk for Lung Cancer in Three Danish Cohorts. Cancer Epidemiol. Biomark. Prev. 2010, 19, 1284–1291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Nagpure, A.S.; Ramaswami, A.; Russell, A. Characterizing the Spatial and Temporal Patterns of Open Burning of Municipal Solid Waste (MSW) in Indian Cities. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2015, 49, 12904–12912. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Eschenroeder, A. Greenhouse Gas Dynamics of Municipal Solid Waste Alternatives. J. Air Waste Manag. Assoc. 2001, 51, 1423–1427. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Beelen, R.; Hoek, G.; Brandt, P.A.V.D.; Goldbohm, R.A.; Fischer, P.; Schouten, L.J.; Armstrong, B.; Brunekreef, B. Long-Term Exposure to Traffic-Related Air Pollution and Lung Cancer Risk. Epidemiology 2008, 19, 702–710. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Cesaroni, G.; Badaloni, C.; Gariazzo, C.; Stafoggia, M.; Sozzi, R.; Davoli, M.; Forastiere, F. Long-Term Exposure to Urban Air Pollution and Mortality in a Cohort of More than a Million Adults in Rome. Environ. Health Perspect. 2013, 121, 324–331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Nafstad, P. Lung cancer and air pollution: A 27 year follow up of 16 209 Norwegian men. Thorax 2003, 58, 1071–1076. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Pope, C.A., III. Lung Cancer, Cardiopulmonary Mortality, and Long-term Exposure to Fine Particulate Air Pollution. JAMA 2002, 287, 1132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Carey, I.M.; Atkinson, R.W.; Kent, A.J.; van Staa, T.; Cook, D.G.; Anderson, H.R. Mortality Associations with Long-Term Exposure to Outdoor Air Pollution in a National English Cohort. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 2013, 187, 1226–1233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Naeher, L.P.; Brauer, M.; Lipsett, M.; Zelikoff, J.T.; Simpson, C.; Koenig, J.Q.; Smith, K.R. Woodsmoke Health Effects: A Review. Inhal. Toxicol. 2007, 19, 67–106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Mcdonnell, W.F.; Nishino-Ishikawa, N.; Petersen, F.F.; Chen, L.H.; Abbey, D.E. Relationships of mortality with the fine and coarse fractions of long-term ambient PM10 concentrations in nonsmokers. J. Expo. Sci. Environ. Epidemiol. 2000, 10, 427–436. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Saud, T.; Mandal, T.; Gadi, R.; Singh, D.; Sharma, S.; Saxena, M.; Mukherjee, A. Emission estimates of particulate matter (PM) and trace gases (SO2, NO and NO2) from biomass fuels used in rural sector of Indo-Gangetic Plain, India. Atmos. Environ. 2011, 45, 5913–5923. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Mondal, A.; Saharan, U.S.; Arya, R.; Yadav, L.; Ahlawat, S.; Jangirh, R.; Kotnala, G.; Choudhary, N.; Banoo, R.; Rai, A.; et al. Non-methane volatile organic compounds emitted from domestic fuels in Delhi: Emission factors and total city-wide emissions. Atmos. Environ. X 2021, 11, 100127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Stewart, G.J.; Nelson, B.S.; Acton, W.J.F.; Vaughan, A.R.; Farren, N.J.; Hopkins, J.R.; Ward, M.W.; Swift, S.J.; Arya, R.; Mondal, A.; et al. Emissions of intermediate-volatility and semi-volatile organic compounds from domestic fuels used in Delhi, India. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 2021, 21, 2407–2426. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Venkataraman, C.; Rao, G.U.M. Emission Factors of Carbon Monoxide and Size-Resolved Aerosols from Biofuel Combustion. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2001, 35, 2100–2107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Location (a) of collection over NCT and experiment setup (b).
Figure 1. Location (a) of collection over NCT and experiment setup (b).
Environsciproc 19 00026 g001
Figure 2. (ac) Particle number concentration by size from different phases during burning of MSW samples collected from three sites: (a) Bhlaswa (Site-I), (b) Ghazipur (Site-II) and (c) Okhla (Site-III) (dilution ratio 1:100).
Figure 2. (ac) Particle number concentration by size from different phases during burning of MSW samples collected from three sites: (a) Bhlaswa (Site-I), (b) Ghazipur (Site-II) and (c) Okhla (Site-III) (dilution ratio 1:100).
Environsciproc 19 00026 g002
Figure 3. Percentage distribution of particle number concentration for different size ranges (0.37–1.0, 1.0–2.5 and 2.5–10 µm) at Bhlaswa (Site-I), Ghazipur (Site-II) and Okhla (Site-III) (dilution ratio 1:100).
Figure 3. Percentage distribution of particle number concentration for different size ranges (0.37–1.0, 1.0–2.5 and 2.5–10 µm) at Bhlaswa (Site-I), Ghazipur (Site-II) and Okhla (Site-III) (dilution ratio 1:100).
Environsciproc 19 00026 g003
Figure 4. Emission factor (mg/kg) for particles of different size at the sample sites, namely, Bhlaswa (Site-I), Ghazipur (Site-II) and Okhla (Site-III) (dilution ratio 1:100).
Figure 4. Emission factor (mg/kg) for particles of different size at the sample sites, namely, Bhlaswa (Site-I), Ghazipur (Site-II) and Okhla (Site-III) (dilution ratio 1:100).
Environsciproc 19 00026 g004
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Arya, R.; Ahlawat, S.; Yadav, L.; Jangirh, R.; Mondal, A.; Sharma, S.K.; Gurjar, B.R.; Nemitz, E.; Mandal, T.K. Particle Size Distribution from Municipal Solid Waste Burning over National Capital Territory, India. Environ. Sci. Proc. 2022, 19, 26. https://doi.org/10.3390/ecas2022-12813

AMA Style

Arya R, Ahlawat S, Yadav L, Jangirh R, Mondal A, Sharma SK, Gurjar BR, Nemitz E, Mandal TK. Particle Size Distribution from Municipal Solid Waste Burning over National Capital Territory, India. Environmental Sciences Proceedings. 2022; 19(1):26. https://doi.org/10.3390/ecas2022-12813

Chicago/Turabian Style

Arya, Rahul, Sakshi Ahlawat, Lokesh Yadav, Ritu Jangirh, Arnab Mondal, Sudhir Kumar Sharma, Bhola Ram Gurjar, Eiko Nemitz, and Tuhin Kumar Mandal. 2022. "Particle Size Distribution from Municipal Solid Waste Burning over National Capital Territory, India" Environmental Sciences Proceedings 19, no. 1: 26. https://doi.org/10.3390/ecas2022-12813

APA Style

Arya, R., Ahlawat, S., Yadav, L., Jangirh, R., Mondal, A., Sharma, S. K., Gurjar, B. R., Nemitz, E., & Mandal, T. K. (2022). Particle Size Distribution from Municipal Solid Waste Burning over National Capital Territory, India. Environmental Sciences Proceedings, 19(1), 26. https://doi.org/10.3390/ecas2022-12813

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop