Next Article in Journal
Effects of Different Rates of Liquid Sewage Sludge Amendment on Nutrient Content of the Soil in Rabat, Morocco
Previous Article in Journal
Reclamation of a Saline-Sodic Soil with Organic Amendments and Leaching
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Proceeding Paper

Impact of Severe Salt Stress on Morphological, Physiological, and Biochemical Parameters in Alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.) †

1
Natural Resources and Environment Laboratory, Multidisciplinary Faculty of Taza, Sidi Mohammed Ben Abdellah University, Fez 30000, Morocco
2
Microbial Biotechnology and Bioactive Molecules Laboratory, Faculty of Sciences and Technologies, Sidi Mohammed Ben Abdellah University, Fez 30000, Morocco
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Presented at the 2nd International Laayoune Forum on Biosaline Agriculture, 14–16 June 2022; Available online: https://lafoba2.sciforum.net/.
Environ. Sci. Proc. 2022, 16(1), 27; https://doi.org/10.3390/environsciproc2022016027
Published: 13 June 2022
(This article belongs to the Proceedings of The 2nd International Laayoune Forum on Biosaline Agriculture)

Abstract

:
In the Mediterranean area, climate change induces an important increase in soil salinity, which threatens crop production. Here, we aimed to test the impact of severe salt stress on the Alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.) used by Moroccan breeders. Stress was applied by increasing salinity gradually by 8 dS/m. Two weeks later, the root dry weight (RDW) and shoot dry weight (SDW) were measured as morphological parameters. Soluble proteins, total soluble sugars (TSS), and proline contents were quantified in both of leaves and roots parts. Furthermore, Chlorophyll a (Chl a), b (Chl b), and total Chlorophyll (Chl T) contents were quantified in leaves to estimate the salt stress impact on the photosynthetic apparatus. Our results showed a significant decrease in morphological parameters under stress. Additionally, a significant reduction in photosynthetic pigment was recorded. Compared to leaves, important accumulations of proline and soluble protein contents in roots were observed. These results indicate that under salt treatment, alfalfa plants react to salinity by storing many molecules in the roots for planned mobilization after recovery.

1. Introduction

Saline soils cover more than 7% of the world’s total land and 70% of all agricultural soils in the world. They have devastating global consequences and are projected to cause 30% land loss within the next 25 years and up to 50% by 2050 [1]. Unfortunately, in Morocco, there is a significant area of land affected by salinity, and about 500,000 hectares are reported to be affected [2]. Salinity is becoming one of the major environmental factors reducing crop yields and threatening the world food balance [3]. To overcome this environmental constraint, different strategies can be adopted, but these methods are very expensive. [4] Therefore, the introduction of resistant varieties to abiotic stress with a high socioeconomic value constitutes one of the approaches to rehabilitating saline soils. Selecting ideal plants for these conditions is the first step to solving the problem of salinity. [5] The objective of this study was to screen the effects of salt stress (induced by NaCl) on physiological and biochemical parameters in alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.).

2. Material and Methods

Homogenous seeds of alfalfa were disinfected and sown in pots containing approximately 1 kg of substrate (soil/peat/sand, (1:1:1)). Twenty-one days after sowing (DAS), two homogenous plants were maintained per pot, and salt stress was applied by irrigation with NaCl solution to increase soil conductivity to 8 dS/m. All pots were arranged randomly in greenhouse at 21 °C under natural light supplemented with artificial light with PAR of 300 µmol photons·m−2·s−1. At 35 DAS, root and shoot parts were harvested, dried at 70 °C for three days, and weighted to estimate root (RDW) and shoot (SDW) dry weight. For physiological parameters, the Chlorophyll (Chl a), b (Chl b), and total Chlorophyll (Chl T) contents were determined using Burnison’s method (1980) [6]; total soluble sugars (TSSs) content was determined according to Erice et al.’s (2007) method [7]; proline was determined using Bates et al.’s (1973) method [8]; and soluble proteins content was quantified following Lowry’s method (1951) [9].

3. Results and Discussion

Our results show that salinity markedly affects all parameters studied. Thus, for morphological parameters, a significant (p < 0.05) reduction in RDW and SDW was recorded under salt stress compared to control plants (Figure 1). The reduction was 77% and 42% in roots and shoots, respectively. These results confirm what was previously reported in the literature [10,11]. This biomass reduction indicates that plants are trying to manage their resources by downregulation of their vegetative growth [12]. The measure of photosynthetic pigments content in leaves showed that salt stress significantly reduces Chl a, Chl b, and total Chlorophyll contents (Figure 1). The decrease in photosynthetic pigment under stressful conditions is widely spread in the literature [13], and it is reported to be linked to other metabolism disturbances, such as electrolytes leakage from thylakoids, the dehydration of protoplasm, lowered photo-assimilation levels, and Chlorophyll photo-oxidation [14]. Moreover, the decrease in photosynthetic pigment under stress is considered a sign of sensitivity [15]. An analysis of variance (Table 1) showed that both parts of plant and treatment factors and their interaction significantly influenced (p < 0.05) the parameters studied. The treatment factor is the most important source of variability for proline, TSS, and soluble protein contents, where this factor explained 75%, 64%, and 60% of the total variability, respectively. Moreover, part of plant factors explained 37%, 29%, and 12% of the total variability of soluble proteins, TSS, and proline contents, respectively, while the effect of the interaction between the last factors was less than 10% for all parameters studied. The results in Figure 2 showed a significant increase in biochemical parameters studied resulting from NaCl treatment in both leaves and root parts, which is in agreement with other studies [16,17]. A significant increase in soluble protein content was shown in salt treatment compared to the control in both leaves and root parts. Soluble proteins contribute to the osmoregulation process in indoor plant mediums [15]. Furthermore, significant increases in proline content in both root and shoot parts were recorded. The increase in proline in stressful conditions is well noted in various studies [11,16]. This amino acid is involved in many physiological functions, such as osmotic adjustment, free radical scavenging, cellular redox potential buffering, and detoxification pathway activation [18]. In alfalfa plants, the accumulation of proline salt stress is linked to salt tolerance [11].
The accumulation of soluble proteins and proline under salt stress appears to be more important in roots, which is also noted in many other papers [19]. It is widely known that alfalfa roots accumulate many molecules under stressful conditions to ensure a stock of molecules for mobilization after recovery [15]. Total soluble sugar contents also increased in stressed plants by 41% and 31% in leaves and roots, respectively. It is well documented that salinity increases the production of many sugars in alfalfa leaves, such as sucrose and pinitol [20]. These carbohydrates are considered osmoregulators that decrease the osmotic potential in order to maintain osmotic homeostasis inside of the cell [21]. The lower accumulation level of these molecules in roots compared to leaves might be explained by the storage of these molecules in the starch form in this part of the alfalfa plant [20].

Author Contributions

N.S.: conceptualization, methodology, formal analysis, writing original draft, formal analysis. M.F.: methodology, formal analysis, writing original draft, formal analysis. S.B. and K.H.: methodology. S.L.: conceptualization, supervision, review and editing, validation, resources, and funding acquisition. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not Applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study.

Data Availability Statement

The study did not report any data.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Rengasamy, P. World salinization with emphasis on Australia. J. Exp. Bot. 2006, 57, 1017–1023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  2. El Goumi, Y.; Fakiri, M.; Lamsaouri, O.; Benchekroun, M. Salt stress effect on seed germination and some physiological traits in three Moroccan barley (Hordeum vulgare L). cultivars. J. Mat. Env. Sci. 2014, 5, 625–632. [Google Scholar]
  3. Walia, H.; Wilson, C.; Wahid, A.; Condamine, P.; Cui, X.; Close, T.J. Expression analysis of barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) during salinity stress. Funct. Integr. Genomics 2006, 6, 143–156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Rhodes, J.; Laveday, J. Salinity in Irrigated Agriculture Riverside; FAO: Rome, Italy, 1990; pp. 1089–1141. [Google Scholar]
  5. Karoune, S.; Kechebar, M.S.A.; Halis, Y.; Djellouli, A.; Rahmoune, C. Effet du stress salin sur la morphologie, la physiologie et la biochimie de l’Acacia albida. J. Alg. Rég. Ar. 2017, 14, 60–73. [Google Scholar]
  6. Burnison, B.K. Modified dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) extraction for chlorophyll analysis of phytoplankton. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 1980, 37, 729–732. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Erice, G.; Irigoyen, J.J.; Sánchez-Díaz, M.; Avice, J.C.; Ourry, A. Effect of drought, elevated CO2 and temperature on accumulation of N and vegetative storage proteins (VSP) in taproot of nodulated alfalfa before and after cutting. Pla. sci. 2007, 172, 903–912. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Bates, L.S.; Waldern, S.P.; Teare, I.D. Rapid determination of free proline for water-stress studies. Plant Soil 1973, 39, 205–207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Lowry, O.H.; Rosebrough, N.J.; Farr, A.L.; Rose, J.; Randall, A.J. Protein measurement with the folin phenol reagent. J. Bio. Chem. 1951, 193, 265–275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. El-Sharkawy, M.S.; El-Beshsbeshy, T.R.; Mahmoud, E.K.; Abdelkader, N.I.; Al-Shal, R.M.; Missaoui, A.M. Response of alfalfa under salt stress to the application of potassium sulfate nanoparticles. AJPS 2017, 8, 1751–1773. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Wang, X.S.; Han, J.G. Changes of proline content, activity, and active isoforms of antioxidative enzymes in two alfalfa cultivars under salt stress. JAS China 2009, 8, 431–440. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Nguyen, K.H.; Ha, C.V.; Nishiyama, R.; Watanabe, Y.; Leyva-González, M.A.; Fujita, Y.; Tran, U.T.; Li, W.; Tanaka, M.; Seki, M.; et al. Arabidopsis type B cytokinin response regulators ARR1, ARR10, and ARR12 negatively regulate plant responses to drought. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2016, 113, 3090–3095. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  13. Ashrafi, E.; Razmjoo, J.; Zahedi, M.; Pessarakli, M. Selecting alfalfa cultivars for salt tolerance based on some physiochemical traits. Agro. J. 2014, 106, 1758–1764. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Gomes, M.A.D.C.; Suzuki, M.S.; Cunha, M.D.; Tullii, C.F. Effect of salt stress on nutrient concentration, photosynthetic pigments, proline and foliar morphology of Salvinia auriculata Aubl. Acta Limno Brasiliensia. 2011, 23, 164–176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  15. Bhattarai, S.; Biswas, D.; Fu, Y.B.; Biligetu, B. Morphological, physiological, and genetic responses to salt stress in alfalfa. Agronomy 2020, 10, 577. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Fougere, F.; Le Rudulier, D.; Streeter, J.G. Effects of salt stress on amino acid, organic acid, and carbohydrate composition of roots, bacteroids, and cytosol of alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.). Plant physiology. 1991, 96, 1228–1236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  17. Torabi, M.; Halim, M.R.A. Variation of root and shoot growth and free proline accumulation in Iranian alfalfa ecotypes under salt stress. J. Food Agric. Environ. 2010, 8, 323–327. [Google Scholar]
  18. Balnška, F.; Ovecka, M.; Hirt, H. Salt stress induces changes in amounts and localization of the mitogen-activated protein kinase SIMK in alfalfa roots. Protoplasma 2000, 212, 262–267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Li, J.; Guo, X.; Zhang, M.; Wang, X.; Zhao, Y.; Yin, Z.; Zhang, Z.; Wanga, Y.; Xionga, H.; Zhanga, H.; et al. OsERF71 confers drought tolerance via modulating ABA signaling and proline biosynthesis. Plant Sci. 2018, 270, 131–139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Xiong, J.; Sun, Y.; Yang, Q.; Tian, H.; Zhang, H.; Liu, Y.; Chen, M. Proteomic analysis of early salt stress responsive proteins in alfalfa roots and shoots. Proteome Sci. 2017, 15, 19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  21. Bertrand, A.; Dhont, C.; Bipfubusa, M.; Chalifour, F.P.; Drouin, P.; Beauchamp, C.J. Improving salt stress responses of the symbiosis in alfalfa using salt-tolerant cultivar and rhizobial strain. Appl. Soil Ecol. 2015, 87, 108–117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Effect of salt stress on roots (RDW) and shoot (SDW) dry weight (a) and Chlorophyll contents in leaves (b) of Medicago sativa L. (**: significant at 0.01. ***: significant at 0.005).
Figure 1. Effect of salt stress on roots (RDW) and shoot (SDW) dry weight (a) and Chlorophyll contents in leaves (b) of Medicago sativa L. (**: significant at 0.01. ***: significant at 0.005).
Environsciproc 16 00027 g001
Figure 2. Effect of salt stress on Total Soluble Sugars (a), soluble proteins (b), and proline (c) contents in roots of Medicago sativa subjected to salt stress. Values indicate means of triplicates (scores with the same letter are not significantly different at p = 0.05).
Figure 2. Effect of salt stress on Total Soluble Sugars (a), soluble proteins (b), and proline (c) contents in roots of Medicago sativa subjected to salt stress. Values indicate means of triplicates (scores with the same letter are not significantly different at p = 0.05).
Environsciproc 16 00027 g002
Table 1. Analysis of variance for proline and soluble sugar and protein contents in root plant part and area plant part (Df: degree of freedom. *: significant at 0.05, **: significant at 0.01. ***: significant at 0.005.).
Table 1. Analysis of variance for proline and soluble sugar and protein contents in root plant part and area plant part (Df: degree of freedom. *: significant at 0.05, **: significant at 0.01. ***: significant at 0.005.).
SourceDfProlineTSSProteins
Part of plant (pp)10.89142 *29.8207 ***246.385 ***
Treatment (trt)15.38135 ***64.6927 ***399.661 ***
Replicates20.056160.24901.208
pp*trt10.74541 *6.4557 **20.663 *
Error60.088340.41901.759
Total11
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Srhiouar, N.; Ferioun, M.; Bouhraoua, S.; Hammani, K.; Louahlia, S. Impact of Severe Salt Stress on Morphological, Physiological, and Biochemical Parameters in Alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.). Environ. Sci. Proc. 2022, 16, 27. https://doi.org/10.3390/environsciproc2022016027

AMA Style

Srhiouar N, Ferioun M, Bouhraoua S, Hammani K, Louahlia S. Impact of Severe Salt Stress on Morphological, Physiological, and Biochemical Parameters in Alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.). Environmental Sciences Proceedings. 2022; 16(1):27. https://doi.org/10.3390/environsciproc2022016027

Chicago/Turabian Style

Srhiouar, Nassira, Mohamed Ferioun, Said Bouhraoua, Khalil Hammani, and Said Louahlia. 2022. "Impact of Severe Salt Stress on Morphological, Physiological, and Biochemical Parameters in Alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.)" Environmental Sciences Proceedings 16, no. 1: 27. https://doi.org/10.3390/environsciproc2022016027

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop