Next Article in Journal
Selecting Low-Flammability Plants as Green Firebreaks within Sustainable Urban Garden Design
Previous Article in Journal
A Hierarchical Classification of Wildland Fire Fuels for Australian Vegetation Types
Article

Conceptualizing Ecological Flammability: An Experimental Test of Three Frameworks Using Various Types and Loads of Surface Fuels

1
School of Natural Sciences, University of Tasmania, Private Bag 55, Hobart, TAS 7001, Australia
2
Research Institute for the Environment and Livelihoods, Charles Darwin University, Darwin, NT 0909, Australia
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Received: 5 March 2018 / Revised: 5 April 2018 / Accepted: 27 April 2018 / Published: 1 May 2018
Vegetation flammability remains poorly defined and involves many intercorrelated components and metrics. Schwilk (2015) proposed a flammability framework with only two axes: total heat release and rate of spread. Pausas et al. (2017) modified this framework by standardizing the heat release axis by fuel load, and adding a third axis of fuel ignitability. We tested these frameworks using data from a field experiment that quantified flammability metrics and survival of Callitris intratropica saplings in relation to fuel type (grass, litter, and mixed grass and litter, all air-dried) and fuel load. Principal components analysis showed PC1 was closely aligned with rate of combustion, flame height and temperature, and PC2 was aligned with duration of combustion. The Schwilk framework separated the fuel types according to rate of spread, and fuel loads according to total heat release. The Pausas framework was less useful in describing community-scale flammability because it removed the effects of fuel load, and there was no support for adding the ignitability axis. Both frameworks successfully predicted sapling mortality, an indicator of fire severity. In addition, the three flammability strategies proposed by Pausas et al. were not well-supported because they assumed unrealistically low heat release by ‘fast-flammable’ fuels. We conclude that the Schwilk framework is useful for conceptualizing community-scale flammability and facilitates modelling for fire management purposes, and exploration of evolutionary relationships. View Full-Text
Keywords: Callitris intratropica; combustibility; flammability components; grass fuels; heat release; ignitability; litter fuels; rate of spread Callitris intratropica; combustibility; flammability components; grass fuels; heat release; ignitability; litter fuels; rate of spread
Show Figures

Figure 1

MDPI and ACS Style

Prior, L.D.; Murphy, B.P.; Bowman, D.M.J.S. Conceptualizing Ecological Flammability: An Experimental Test of Three Frameworks Using Various Types and Loads of Surface Fuels. Fire 2018, 1, 14. https://doi.org/10.3390/fire1010014

AMA Style

Prior LD, Murphy BP, Bowman DMJS. Conceptualizing Ecological Flammability: An Experimental Test of Three Frameworks Using Various Types and Loads of Surface Fuels. Fire. 2018; 1(1):14. https://doi.org/10.3390/fire1010014

Chicago/Turabian Style

Prior, Lynda D., Brett P. Murphy, and David M.J.S. Bowman. 2018. "Conceptualizing Ecological Flammability: An Experimental Test of Three Frameworks Using Various Types and Loads of Surface Fuels" Fire 1, no. 1: 14. https://doi.org/10.3390/fire1010014

Find Other Styles
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Back to TopTop