Urban Forest Above-Ground Biomass Estimation Based on UAV 3D Real Scene
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Study Area
2.2. Data Acquisition
2.2.1. UAV Data
2.2.2. Field Measurements
2.3. Study Methods
2.3.1. UAV Visible-Light 3D Real-Scene Model Construction Method
2.3.2. Single-Wood Parameter Extraction Method
2.3.3. Single-Wood AGB Estimation Method
2.3.4. Evaluation of the Accuracy of AGB Estimation
3. Results
3.1. 3D Real-Scene Model Construction Results
3.2. Single-Wood Parameter Extraction Results
3.3. Single-Wood AGB Model Construction
3.4. Single-Wood AGB Estimation and Evaluation
4. Discussion
5. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Cai, Z.; Peng, B.; Ji, X.; Ji, P. Construction and application of city-level real 3D city: A case study of Linyi real 3D city. Bullet. Survey. Mapp. 2021, 11, 115–119+144. [Google Scholar]
- Zlatanova, S.; Rahman, A.A.; Shi, W. Topological models and frameworks for 3D spatial objects. Comput. Geosci. 2004, 30, 419–428. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, J.; Dowman, I.; Li, S.; Li, Z.; Madden, M.; Mills, J.; Paparoditis, N.; Franz, R.; Sester, M.; Toth, C.; et al. Information from imagery: ISPRS scientific vision and research agenda. ISPRS J. Photogramm. Remote Sens. 2016, 115, 3–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Arruda, W.D.S.; Oldeland, J.; Filho, A.C.P.; Pott, A.; Cunha, N.L.; Ishii, I.H.; Damasceno-Junior, G.A. Inundation and Fire Shape the Structure of Riparian Forests in the Pantanal, Brazil. PLoS ONE 2016, 11, e0156825. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Zachmann, L.J.; Shaw, D.W.; Dickson, B.G. Prescribed fire and natural recovery produce similar long-term patterns of change in forest structure in the Lake Tahoe basin, California. For. Ecol. Manag. 2018, 409, 276–287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, Y.; Lehtomäki, M.; Liang, X.; Pyörälä, J.; Kukko, A.; Jaakkola, A.; Liu, J.; Feng, Z.; Chen, R.; Hyyppä, J. Is field-measured tree height as reliable as believed—A comparison study of tree height estimates from field measurement, airborne laser scanning and terrestrial laser scanning in a boreal forest. ISPRS J. Photogramm. Remote. Sens. 2019, 147, 132–145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wiggins, H.L.; Nelson, C.R.; Larson, A.J.; Safford, H.D. Using LiDAR to develop high-resolution reference models of forest structure and spatial pattern. For. Ecol. Manag. 2019, 434, 318–330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hartling, S.; Sagan, V.; Maimaitijiang, M.; Dannevik, W.; Pasken, R. Estimating tree-related power outages for regional utility network using airborne LiDAR data and spatial statistics. Int. J. Appl. Earth Obs. Geoinf. 2021, 100, 102330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Guo, Q.; Hu, T.; Liu, J.; Jin, S.; Xiao, Q.; Yang, G.; Gao, X.; Xu, Q.; Xie, P.; Peng, Z.; et al. Advances in light weight unmanned aerial vehicle remote sensing and major industrial applications. Progress Geogr. 2021, 40, 1550–1569. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kohek, S.; Žalik, B.; Strnad, D.; Kolmanič, S.; Lukač, N. Simulation-driven 3D forest growth forecasting based on airborne topographic LiDAR data and shading. Int. J. Appl. Earth Obs. Geoinf. 2022, 111, 102844. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tang, L.; Peng, X.; Chen, C.; Huang, H.; Lin, D. Three-dimensional Forest growth simulation in virtual geographic environments. Int. J. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2019, 12, 31–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, W.; Zang, Y.; Xiong, Z.; Bian, X.; Wen, C.; Lu, X.; Wang, C.; Marcato, J.; Gonçalves, W.N.; Li, J. 3D building model generation from MLS point cloud and 3D mesh using multi-source data fusion. Int. J. Appl. Earth Obs. Geoinf. 2023, 116, 103171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jia, X.; Zhang, Y.; Du, A. Three-dimensional characterization and calculation of highway space visual perception. Heliyon 2022, 8, e10118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, C.; Jia, X.; Zhao, Y.; Jin, H.; Liu, L.; Yin, H.; Wang, Z. Review of Methods on Estimating Forest Biomass. J. Beihua Univ. 2019, 20, 391–394. [Google Scholar]
- Jayathunga, S.; Owari, T.; Tsuyuki, S. Evaluating the Performance of Photogrammetric Products Using Fixed-Wing UAV Imagery over a Mixed Conifer–Broadleaf Forest: Comparison with Airborne Laser Scanning. Remote. Sens. 2018, 10, 187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Li, X.; Du, H.; Zhou, G.; Mao, F.; Zhang, M.; Han, N.; Fan, W.; Liu, H.; Huang, Z.; He, S.; et al. Phenology estimation of subtropical bamboo forests based on assimilated MODIS LAI time series data. ISPRS J. Photogramm. Remote. Sens. 2021, 173, 262–277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yadav, S.; Padalia, H.; Sinha, S.K.; Srinet, R.; Chauhan, P. Above-ground biomass estimation of Indian tropical forests using X band Pol-InSAR and Random Forest. Remote. Sens. Appl. Soc. Environ. 2021, 21, 100462. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, H.; Zhang, G.; Zhong, Q.; Xing, L.; Du, H. Prediction of Urban Forest Aboveground Carbon Using Machine Learning Based on Landsat 8 and Sentinel-2: A Case Study of Shanghai, China. Remote. Sens. 2023, 15, 284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhou, L.; Li, X.; Zhang, B.; Xuan, J.; Gong, Y.; Tan, C.; Huang, H.; Du, H. Estimating 3D Green Volume and Aboveground Biomass of Urban Forest Trees by UAV-Lidar. Remote. Sens. 2022, 14, 5211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zuo, S.D.; Ren, Y. Study on the temporal and spatial variation of forest landscape and ecological quality during the fast urbanization process. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2015, 38, 191–198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Lin, J.; Shu, L.; Zuo, H.; Zhang, B. Experimental observation and assessment of ice conditions with a fixed-wing unmanned aerial vehicle over Yellow River, China. J. Appl. Remote. Sens. 2012, 6, 063586. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sofonia, J.J.; Phinn, S.; Roelfsema, C.; Kendoul, F.; Rist, Y. Modelling the effects of fundamental UAV flight parameters on LiDAR point clouds to facilitate objectives-based planning. ISPRS J. Photogramm. Remote. Sens. 2019, 149, 105–118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- An, P.T.; Huyen, P.T.T.; Le, N.T. A modified Graham’s convex hull algorithm for finding the connected orthogonal convex hull of a finite planar point set. Appl. Math. Comput. 2021, 397, 125889. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, Q.; Li, B.; Cen, J. Research on Laser Range Scanning and lts Application. Geomat. Inform. Sci. Wuhan Univ. 2000, 4, 387–392. [Google Scholar]
- Hilker, T.; van Leeuwen, M.; Coops, N.C.; Wulder, M.A.; Newnham, G.J.; Jupp, D.L.B.; Culvenor, D.S. Comparing canopy metrics derived from terrestrial and airborne laser scanning in a Douglas-fir dominated forest stand. Trees Struct. Funct. 2010, 24, 819–832. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Guo, L.; Chehata, N.; Mallet, C.; Boukir, S. Relevance of airborne lidar and multispectral image data for urban scene classification using Random Forests. ISPRS J. Photogramm. Remote. Sens. 2011, 66, 56–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wulder, M.A.; White, J.C.; Nelson, R.F.; Næsset, E.; Ørka, H.O.; Coops, N.C.; Hilker, T.; Bater, C.W.; Gobakken, T. Lidar Sampling for Large-Area Forest Characterization: A Review. Remote Sens. Environ. 2012, 121, 196–209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Liu, H.; Zhang, Z.; Cao, L. Estimating forest stand characteristics in a coastal plain forest plantation basedon vertical structure profile parameters derived from ALS data. J. Remote Sens. 2018, 22, 872–888. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, B.; Li, X.; Du, H.; Zhou, G.; Mao, F.; Huang, Z.; Zhou, L.; Xuan, J.; Gong, Y.; Chen, C. Estimation of Urban Forest Characteristic Parameters Using UAV-Lidar Coupled with Canopy Volume. Remote. Sens. 2022, 14, 6375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tian, Y.; Zhang, Q.; Huang, H.; Huang, Y.; Tao, J.; Zhou, G.; Zhang, Y.; Yang, Y.; Lin, J. Aboveground biomass of typical invasive mangroves and its distribution patterns using UAV-LiDAR data in a subtropical estuary: Maoling River estuary, Guangxi, China. Ecol. Indic. 2022, 136, 108694. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wu, P.; Ren, G.; Zhang, C.; Wang, H.; Liu, S.; Ma, Y. Fine identification and biomass estimation of mangroves based on UAV multispectral and LiDAR. Nat. Remote Sens. Bulletin. 2022, 26, 1169–1181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fekry, R.; Yao, W.; Cao, L.; Shen, X. Ground-based/UAV-LiDAR data fusion for quantitative structure modeling and tree parameter retrieval in subtropical planted forest. For. Ecosyst. 2022, 9, 100065. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lin, J.; Chen, D.; Wu, W.; Liao, X. Estimating aboveground biomass of urban forest trees with dual-source UAV acquired point clouds. Urban For. Urban Green. 2022, 69, 127521. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xu, X.; Zhou, Z.; Tang, Y.; Qu, Y. Individual tree crown detection from high spatial resolution imagery using a revised local maximum filtering. Remote. Sens. Environ. 2021, 258, 112397. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, K.; Cao, L.; Wang, G.; Cao, F. Biomass allocation patterns and allometric models of Ginkgo biloba. J. Beijing For. Univ. 2017, 39, 12–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cao, Z. Biomass and Distribution Pattern of Cinnamomum camphora in Yangzhou. For. Sci. Technol. 2020, 574, 69–71. [Google Scholar]
- Iglhaut, J.; Cabo, C.; Puliti, S.; Piermattei, L.; O’Connor, J.; Rosette, J. Structure from Motion Photogrammetry in Forestry: A Review. Curr. For. Rep. 2019, 5, 155–168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Hu, Q.; Woldt, W.; Neale, C.; Zhou, Y.; Drahota, J.; Varner, D.; Bishop, A.; LaGrange, T.; Zhang, L.; Tang, Z. Utilizing unsupervised learning, multi-view imaging, and CNN-based attention facilitates cost-effective wetland mapping. Remote. Sens. Environ. 2021, 267, 112757. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xie, L.; Lee, F.; Liu, L.; Yin, Z.; Yan, Y.; Wang, W.; Zhao, J.; Chen, Q. Improved spatial pyramid matching for scene recognition. Pattern Recognit. 2018, 82, 118–129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, Y.; Liu, X.; Yang, J.; Dang, J. Dense Matching of Multi-View Remote Sensing Terrain lmage Based on lmproved PMVS Algorithm. Laser Optoelectron. Progress 2021, 58, 516–525. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kang, C.; Cheng, Y.; Shi, L. Application of UAV tilt photography modeling technology in virtual reality. J. Guilin Univ. Technol. 2020, 40, 138–142. [Google Scholar]
- Hao, Y.; Zhen, Z.; Li, F.; Zhao, Y. A graph-based progressive morphological filtering (GPMF) method for generating canopy height models using ALS data. Int. J. Appl. Earth Obs. Geoinf. 2019, 79, 84–96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fan, Z.; Li, J.; Deng, M. An Adaptive lnverse-Distance Weighting Spatial lnterpolation Method with the Consideration of Multiple Factors. Geomat. Inform. Sci. Wuhan Univ. 2016, 41, 842–847. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, Z.; Liu, Q.; Li, C.; Li, M.; Zhou, X.; Yu, Z.; Su, K. Comparison in linear and nonlinear estimation models of carbon storage of plantations based on UAV LiDAR. J. Beijing For. Univ. 2021, 43, 9–16. [Google Scholar]
- Feng, Y.; Lu, D.; Chen, Q.; Keller, M.; Moran, E.; Dos-Santos, M.N.; Bolfe, E.L.; Batistella, M. Examining effective use of data sources and modeling algorithms for improving biomass estimation in a moist tropical forest of the Brazilian Amazon. Int. J. Digit. Earth 2017, 10, 996–1016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pati, P.K.; Kaushik, P.; Khan, M.; Khare, P. Allometric equations for biomass and carbon stock estimation of small diameter woody species from tropical dry deciduous forests: Support to REDD+. Trees, For. People 2022, 9, 100289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Münzinger, M.; Prechtel, N.; Behnisch, M. Mapping the urban forest in detail: From LiDAR point clouds to 3D tree models. Urban For. Urban Green. 2022, 74, 127637. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Qin, H.; Zhou, W.; Yao, Y.; Wang, W. Individual tree segmentation and tree species classification in subtropical broadleaf forests using UAV-based LiDAR, hyperspectral, and ultrahigh-resolution RGB data. Remote. Sens. Environ. 2022, 280, 113143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Anderson, K.; Gaston, K.J. Lightweight unmanned aerial vehicles will revolutionize spatial ecology. Front. Ecol. Environ. 2013, 11, 138–146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Zellweger, F.; Braunisch, V.; Baltensweiler, A.; Bollmann, K. Remotely sensed forest structural complexity predicts multi species occurrence at the landscape scale. For. Ecol. Manag. 2013, 307, 303–312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Geng, L.; Li, M.; Fan, W.; Wang, B. Individual Tree Structure Parameters and Effective Crown of the Stand Extraction Base on Airborn LiDAR Data. Sci. Silvae Sinicae. 2018, 54, 62–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, D.; Wan, B.; Liu, J.; Su, Y.; Guo, Q.; Qiu, P.; Wu, X. Estimating aboveground biomass of the mangrove forests on northeast Hainan Island in China using an upscaling method from field plots, UAV-LiDAR data and Sentinel-2 imagery. Int. J. Appl. Earth Obs. Geoinf. 2020, 85, 101986. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xu, Z.; Shen, X.; Cao, L.; Coops, N.C.; Goodbody, T.R.; Zhong, T.; Zhao, W.; Sun, Q.; Ba, S.; Zhang, Z.; et al. Tree species classification using UAS-based digital aerial photogrammetry point clouds and multispectral imageries in subtropical natural forests. Int. J. Appl. Earth Obs. Geoinf. 2020, 92, 102173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Donager, J.; Sankey, T.T.; Meador, A.J.S.; Sankey, J.B.; Springer, A. Integrating airborne and mobile lidar data with UAV photogrammetry for rapid assessment of changing forest snow depth and cover. Sci. Remote. Sens. 2021, 4, 100029. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Scheeres, J.; de Jong, J.; Brede, B.; Brancalion, P.H.; Broadbent, E.N.; Zambrano, A.M.A.; Gorgens, E.B.; Silva, C.A.; Valbuena, R.; Molin, P.; et al. Distinguishing forest types in restored tropical landscapes with UAV-borne LIDAR. Remote. Sens. Environ. 2023, 290, 113533. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Tree Species | Number | DBH 1 Range/m | DBH Mean/m | H 2 Range/m | H Mean/m |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Ginkgo | 70 | 0.149–0.228 | 0.187 | 6.8–14.3 | 11.1 |
Camphora | 70 | 0.157–0.308 | 0.230 | 6.2–11.0 | 8.6 |
Group 1: Tree Height, Crown Diameter | Group 2: Tree Height, Crown Volume |
---|---|
1 | 2 |
Species | Model | Train | Test | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R2 | RMSE/ (kg) | R2 | RMSE/ (kg) | ||
Ginkgo | AGB = 7.029 × Rc + 13.608 × H − 101.141 | 0.91 | 8.34 | 0.94 | 6.62 |
AGB = 0.847 × 2 + 13.503 × H − 85.978 | 0.89 | 8.68 | 0.94 | 7.18 | |
AGB = 0.103 × (Rc + H)2.415 | 0.89 | 8.97 | 0.92 | 8.01 | |
AGB = 0.731 × (Rc × H)1.191 | 0.84 | 10.79 | 0.82 | 12.46 | |
AGB = 171.008 × ln(Rc + H) − 387.496 | 0.86 | 10.10 | 0.88 | 9.78 | |
AGB = 81.401 × ln(Rc × H) − 237.345 | 0.80 | 12.12 | 0.80 | 12.70 | |
Camphora | AGB = 1.564 ×Rc + 64.574 × H − 421.276 | 0.89 | 20.75 | 0.90 | 30.46 |
AGB = 0.189 ×2 + 63.811 × H − 413.120 | 0.88 | 21.51 | 0.90 | 30.09 | |
AGB = 0.133 × (Rc + H)2.574 | 0.67 | 34.29 | 0.67 | 49.11 | |
AGB = 1.343 × (Rc × H)1.168 | 0.74 | 30.79 | 0.80 | 43.71 | |
AGB = 418.021 × ln(Rc + H) − 983.588 | 0.81 | 27.07 | 0.84 | 39.74 | |
AGB = 191.899 × ln(Rc × H) − 617.997 | 0.77 | 29.57 | 0.77 | 43.74 |
Species | Model | Train | Test | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R2 | RMSE/ (kg) | R2 | RMSE/ (kg) | ||
Ginkgo | AGB = 0.281 × Vc + 59.488 × H − 385.314 | 0.93 | 8.22 | 0.96 | 6.02 |
2 + 10.608 × H − 55.112 | 0.91 | 8.58 | 0.94 | 7.15 | |
AGB = 2.624 × (Vc + H)0.790 | 0.90 | 8.90 | 0.92 | 7.96 | |
AGB = 2.121 × (Vc × H)0.553 | 0.88 | 9.62 | 0.90 | 8.66 | |
AGB = 54.151 × ln(Vc+ H) − 150.733 | 0.84 | 12.06 | 0.87 | 10.56 | |
AGB = 37.595 × ln(Vc× H) − 162.958 | 0.83 | 11.11 | 0.89 | 9.60 | |
Camphora | AGB = 0.281 × Vc + 59.488 × H − 385.314 | 0.91 | 19.27 | 0.90 | 29.53 |
2 + 59.686 × H − 376.165 | 0.90 | 20.75 | 0.92 | 27.74 | |
AGB = 14.769 × (Vc+ H)0.569 | 0.77 | 29.38 | 0.75 | 45.73 | |
AGB = 6.629 × (Vc × H)0.508 | 0.76 | 25.83 | 0.74 | 44.37 | |
AGB = 104.272 × ln(Vc+ H) − 274.272 | 0.80 | 31.56 | 0.86 | 36.92 | |
AGB = 91.899 × ln(Vc × H) − 412.214 | 0.83 | 21.76 | 0.83 | 35.09 |
Ginkgo | Camphor | |||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Train | Test | Train | Test | |||||||||
Min | Max | Average | Min | Max | Average | Min | Max | Average | Min | Max | Average | |
Field | 32.60 | 134.85 | 75.20 | 32.85 | 129.78 | 78.34 | 79.72 | 373.32 | 188.34 | 116.14 | 448.85 | 229.28 |
3D | 34.36 | 138.05 | 77.83 | 41.60 | 129.40 | 79.85 | 65.30 | 376.88 | 190.22 | 133.32 | 367.42 | 222.70 |
LiDAR | 31.49 | 120.28 | 76.57 | 33.55 | 128.78 | 79.02 | 77.37 | 362.26 | 189.87 | 133.84 | 445.48 | 230.39 |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2023 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Zhao, Y.; Zhou, L.; Chen, C.; Li, X.; Du, H.; Yu, J.; Lv, L.; Huang, L.; Song, M. Urban Forest Above-Ground Biomass Estimation Based on UAV 3D Real Scene. Drones 2023, 7, 455. https://doi.org/10.3390/drones7070455
Zhao Y, Zhou L, Chen C, Li X, Du H, Yu J, Lv L, Huang L, Song M. Urban Forest Above-Ground Biomass Estimation Based on UAV 3D Real Scene. Drones. 2023; 7(7):455. https://doi.org/10.3390/drones7070455
Chicago/Turabian StyleZhao, Yinyin, Lv Zhou, Chao Chen, Xuejian Li, Huaqiang Du, Jiacong Yu, Lujin Lv, Lei Huang, and Meixuan Song. 2023. "Urban Forest Above-Ground Biomass Estimation Based on UAV 3D Real Scene" Drones 7, no. 7: 455. https://doi.org/10.3390/drones7070455