Next Article in Journal
Low-Voltage Tri-Electrode Electrostatic Actuator Using Solid Gap-Spacing Materials
Previous Article in Journal
Annealed Gallium-Doped Zinc Oxide (ZnO:Ga) Thin Films for Sub-ppm NO2 Sensing
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Abstract

Optically Induced Dielectrophoresis and Machine Learning Algorithms for the Identification of the Circulating Tumor Cells †

1
Department of Electronic Engineering, University of Rome Tor Vergata, 00133 Rome, Italy
2
Interdisciplinary Center for Advanced Studies on Lab-on-Chip and Organ-on-Chip Applications (ICLOC), 00133 Rome, Italy
3
Department of Biology, University of Rome Tor Vergata, 00133 Rome, Italy
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Presented at the XXXV EUROSENSORS Conference, Lecce, Italy, 10–13 September 2023.
Proceedings 2024, 97(1), 71; https://doi.org/10.3390/proceedings2024097071
Published: 21 March 2024

Abstract

:
Detecting circulating tumor cells (CTCs) is a challenge in cancer research. Their dissemination into the blood stream represents a crucial event in the formation of the metastases from the primary tumor. For this reason, targeting CTCs in human liquid biopsies is a warning event for cancer invasiveness, progression, and prognosis. In this regard, by means of the optically induced dielectrophoresis (ODEP) technique, we investigated the response to the electric field, at different frequencies, of human prostatic carcinoma PC3 cells, which mimic CTCs derived from prostate cancer, and human leukemia monocytic THP-1 cells, which simulate circulating monocytes. The obtained spectra of the cell motion descriptors represent the unique identification signature of each cell type.

1. Introduction

The high-purity isolation and analyses of CTCs are crucial in developing targeted therapy [1]. Additionally, these cells are rare and heterogeneous, so identifying them is difficult. Their detection with common epithelial markers that are not expressed in normal blood cells can fail when some cell subtypes miss the markers mentioned above [1]. In this regard, we explored the potential of using ODEP-based multi-spectral analysis to distinguish between PC3 [2] and THP-1 cells [3] in a label-free manner. The proposed method highlights the dielectric signature of every cell population, allowing for the identification of different cell types by exploiting their response to the DEP force.

2. Materials and Methods

Cell manipulation was performed using an ODEP-based Lab-on-Chip device and an optical platform [4], as shown in Figure 1. An AC potential was applied between the ITO layers, and a light pattern was projected on the a-Si. The generated non-uniform electric field induced a dielectrophoretic (DEP) force on the cells by producing three different cell motions: attractive (pDEP), repulsive (nDEP), or steady-state cell motions. Single cells were measured at different frequencies in a range 25–150 kHz with steps of 5 kHz and an amplitude of 10 Vpp. Videos of the DEP-induced motion were acquired, and the cell tracking procedure allowed us to extract a set of cell parameters for each n frequency: the cumulative displacement C D f n , the maximum velocity v m a x f n , and the maximum DEP force FDEP_max(fn) were used as inputs to build a classification model [4].

3. Discussion

The response spectra of CD(fn) and FDEP_max(fn) for both PC-3 and THP-1 cells are shown in Figure 2a and Figure 2b, respectively. As shown, the two cell populations exhibited different crossover frequencies: 30 kHz for PC-3 (blue dotted line) and 50 kHz for THP-1 (green dotted line). The extracted features have been used to build an LDA classification model whose confusion matrix and total accuracy value obtained in the 5-fold cross-validation are shown in Figure 2c. The high discrimination rate suggests that the proposed system, with the appropriate operating conditions, can sort cells and isolate CTCs in a label-free manner under continuous flow.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, methodology, and formal analysis, J.F., P.C. and E.M.; data curation, J.F., G.A., M.D., R.C., G.C. and A.M.; biological experiments, J.F., F.C. (Francesca Corsi), F.C. (Francesco Capradossi) and L.G.; writing—original draft preparation, J.F., P.C., A.M. and E.M.; writing—review and editing, all authors. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Data are available on request.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Plaks, V.; Koopman, C.D.; Werb, Z. Circulating Tumor Cells. Science 2013, 341, 1186–1188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Chen, H.-H.; Lin, M.-W.; Tien, W.-T.; Lai, C.-P.; Weng, K.-Y.; Ko, C.-H.; Lin, C.-C.; Chen, J.-C.; Tiao, K.-T.; Chen, T.-C.; et al. High-purity separation of cancer cells by optically induced dielectrophoresis. J. Biomed. Opt. 2014, 19, 1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Chanput, W.; Mes, J.; Vreeburg, R.A.M.; Savelkoul, H.F.J.; Wichers, H.J. Transcription profiles of LPS-stimulated THP-1 monocytes and macrophages: A tool to study inflammation modulating effects of food-derived compounds. Food Funct. 2010, 1, 254–261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Filippi, J.; Di Giuseppe, D.; Casti, P.; Mencattini, A.; Antonelli, G.; D’Orazio, M.; Corsi, F.; Della-Morte Canosci, D.; Ghibelli, L.; Witte, C.; et al. Exploiting spectral information in Opto-Electronic Tweezers for cell classification and drug response evaluation. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2022, 368, 132200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Schematic representation of the ODEP system setup with details on the cell measurement strategy.
Figure 1. Schematic representation of the ODEP system setup with details on the cell measurement strategy.
Proceedings 97 00071 g001
Figure 2. Spectra of cumulative displacement (a) and maximum DEP force (b). Average values and standard deviations are reported. Dotted lines indicate the crossover frequency (fco). (c) Confusion matrix of the LDA model.
Figure 2. Spectra of cumulative displacement (a) and maximum DEP force (b). Average values and standard deviations are reported. Dotted lines indicate the crossover frequency (fco). (c) Confusion matrix of the LDA model.
Proceedings 97 00071 g002
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Filippi, J.; Corsi, F.; Casti, P.; Antonelli, G.; D’Orazio, M.; Capradossi, F.; Capuano, R.; Curci, G.; Ghibelli, L.; Mencattini, A.; et al. Optically Induced Dielectrophoresis and Machine Learning Algorithms for the Identification of the Circulating Tumor Cells. Proceedings 2024, 97, 71. https://doi.org/10.3390/proceedings2024097071

AMA Style

Filippi J, Corsi F, Casti P, Antonelli G, D’Orazio M, Capradossi F, Capuano R, Curci G, Ghibelli L, Mencattini A, et al. Optically Induced Dielectrophoresis and Machine Learning Algorithms for the Identification of the Circulating Tumor Cells. Proceedings. 2024; 97(1):71. https://doi.org/10.3390/proceedings2024097071

Chicago/Turabian Style

Filippi, Joanna, Francesca Corsi, Paola Casti, Gianni Antonelli, Michele D’Orazio, Francesco Capradossi, Rosamaria Capuano, Giorgia Curci, Lina Ghibelli, Arianna Mencattini, and et al. 2024. "Optically Induced Dielectrophoresis and Machine Learning Algorithms for the Identification of the Circulating Tumor Cells" Proceedings 97, no. 1: 71. https://doi.org/10.3390/proceedings2024097071

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop