Adoption of a Social Robot in a Sub Intensive Care Unit for the Autonomous Computation of Criticality Scores †
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
- MEWS (Modified Early Warning Score) [2] which computes the clinical stability of the patient.
- qSOFA (quick Sequential Organ Failure Assessment) [3] which estimates the level of organ failure linked to sepsis.
- KDIGO (Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes) [4] which is widely used to diagnose kidney injuries.
3. Discussion
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Teng, R.; Ding, Y.; See, K.C. Use of robots in critical care: Systematic review. J. Med. Internet Res. 2022, 24, e33380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Hammond, N.E.; Spooner, A.J.; Barnett, A.G.; Corley, A.; Brown, P.; Fraser, J.F. The effect of implementing a modified early warning scoring (mews) system on the adequacy of vital sign documentation. Aust. Crit. Care 2013, 26, 18–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- LeGuen, M.; Ballueer, Y.; McKay, R.; Eastwood, G.; Bellomo, R.; Jones, D. Frequency and significance of qSOFA criteria during adult rapid response team reviews: A prospective cohort study. Resuscitation 2018, 122, 13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Khwaja, A. KDIGO Clinical Practice Guideline for Acute Kidney Injury. Nephron Clin. Pract. 2012, 120, c179–c184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Koksal, O.; Torun, G.; Ahun, E.; Sıgırlı, D.; Guney, S.B.; Aydın, M.O. The comparison of modified early warning score and glasgow coma scale-age-systolic blood pressure scores in the assessment of nontraumatic critical patients in emergency department. Niger. J. Clin. Pract. 2016, 16, 761–765. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Parameter | How It Is Measured |
---|---|
Vital Signs | Multiparametric ICU monitor |
Urine Volume | Digital Urinometer |
Laboratory Data | Laboratory Information Management System |
Alertness level of the patient | Interaction with a Social Robot |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2024 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Piccininno, G.; Laurieri, N.; Anselmo, A.; Russo, S.; Sorrentino, A.; Sancarlo, D.; D’Onofrio, G.; Lorusso, L.; Fiorini, L.; Cavallo, F.; et al. Adoption of a Social Robot in a Sub Intensive Care Unit for the Autonomous Computation of Criticality Scores. Proceedings 2024, 97, 6. https://doi.org/10.3390/proceedings2024097006
Piccininno G, Laurieri N, Anselmo A, Russo S, Sorrentino A, Sancarlo D, D’Onofrio G, Lorusso L, Fiorini L, Cavallo F, et al. Adoption of a Social Robot in a Sub Intensive Care Unit for the Autonomous Computation of Criticality Scores. Proceedings. 2024; 97(1):6. https://doi.org/10.3390/proceedings2024097006
Chicago/Turabian StylePiccininno, Giovanni, Nicola Laurieri, Alessandro Anselmo, Sergio Russo, Alessandra Sorrentino, Daniele Sancarlo, Grazia D’Onofrio, Letizia Lorusso, Laura Fiorini, Filippo Cavallo, and et al. 2024. "Adoption of a Social Robot in a Sub Intensive Care Unit for the Autonomous Computation of Criticality Scores" Proceedings 97, no. 1: 6. https://doi.org/10.3390/proceedings2024097006
APA StylePiccininno, G., Laurieri, N., Anselmo, A., Russo, S., Sorrentino, A., Sancarlo, D., D’Onofrio, G., Lorusso, L., Fiorini, L., Cavallo, F., Greco, A., & Giuliani, F. (2024). Adoption of a Social Robot in a Sub Intensive Care Unit for the Autonomous Computation of Criticality Scores. Proceedings, 97(1), 6. https://doi.org/10.3390/proceedings2024097006