Next Article in Journal
Qualitative Identification of Roseburia hominis in Faeces Samples Obtained from Patients with Irritable Bowel Syndrome and Healthy Individuals
Previous Article in Journal
A Methodology for the Digitalization of the Residential Building Renovation Process through IDDS Ready Workflows
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Proceeding Paper

Antibiofilm Properties Exhibited by the Prickly Pear (Opuntia ficus-indica) Seed Oil †

1
Institute of Food Science, CNR-ISA, Via Roma 64, 83100 Avellino, Italy
2
Department of Pharmacy, DiFARMA, University of Salerno, via Giovanni Paolo II, 132-84084 Fisciano (SA), Italy
3
Department of Agriculture, Environment and Food, DiAAA, University of Molise, Via de Sanctis snc, 86100 Campobasso, Italy
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Presented at the 1st International Electronic Conference on Microbiology, 2–30 November 2020; Available online: https://ecm2020.sciforum.net/.
Proceedings 2020, 66(1), 29; https://doi.org/10.3390/proceedings2020066029
Published: 11 January 2021
(This article belongs to the Proceedings of The 1st International Electronic Conference on Microbiology)

Abstract

:
Prickly pear [Opuntia ficus-indica (L.) Mill.] is a succulent plant that is globally diffused. The oil obtained from its seeds has antimicrobial and antioxidant properties. We evaluated the antibiofilm of the oil and its capacity to block the metabolic changes taking place in the microbial cells included in the biofilm. The oil was capable to inhibit at 38.75% the biofilm of Escherichia coli, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Pectobacterium carotovorum (38.75%, 71.84%, and 63.06% inhibition, respectively). The metabolic activity of the microbial cells within the biofilm was also strongly inhibited. The action of the prickly pear seeds oil was effective also in blocking at 64.97% the metabolism of Listeria monocytogenes cells.

1. Introduction

Prickly or cactus pear [Opuntia ficus-indica (L.) Mill., 1768] is a succulent plant belonging to the Cactaceae family, native to Central America but now diffused both in the Mediterranean area (mainly Sicily, Calabria, Puglia, Sardinia, and Malta) and in the temperate areas of America, Africa, Asia, and Oceania. It is a drought-tolerant crop and needs low agronomic requirements and high water use efficiency. Generally, the fruits are used for human consumption, and cladodes (called pad) are consumed as animal feed. The fruit is an oval-shaped berry with an average weight of 100–200 g, constituted mainly by juicy pulp [1]. Seeds contribute 10% to 15% to the pulp weight. Oil obtained from the seed represents 7–15% of the whole seed weight [2]. Seeds also have a high content of oil (98.8 g/kg) [3], characterized by high levels of linoleic and oleic acids and other components such as phenols, all of which have a benefit on human health [4,5,6,7,8]. The health-promoting properties of prickly pear fruit is highly appealing, also for the development of nutraceutical and functional foods, as well as for the emphasis that consumers give toward the search of new products or components with high benefits.
Cactus pear contains several bioactive compounds exhibiting high antioxidant and antimicrobial activity [9].
The antimicrobial activity of the cactus pear seed oil has been demonstrated vs. different pathogens, such as Escherichia coli, Staphylococcus aureus, and Pseudomonas aeruginosa [10]. The oil is also useful as preserving agent to improve the shelf life of fresh food, such as sliced beef, meliorating concurrently the quality of the product and safeguarding it from a microbiological point of view [11]. The extract of cactus pear cladodes showed a noticeable activity in inhibiting the biofilm formation of St. aureus [12]. The aim of our work was to evaluate the capacity of the prickly pear seeds oil in inhibiting the formation of biofilm of different pathogens and in blocking the metabolic changes taking place in the microbial cells included in the biofilm.

2. Material and Methods

Organic prickly pear (Opuntia ficus-indica L.) seed oil, obtained through cold pressure, was purchased from the company Bionoble Cosmétiques BIO (Paris, France). The bacterial culture medium, PBS, DMSO, tetracycline, ciprofloxacin, and MTT were supplied by Sigma (Milano, Italy).

2.1. Microorganisms and Culture Conditions

Listeria monocytogenes ATCC 7644, EHEC, Escherichia coli DSM 8579, Pseudomonas aeruginosa DSM 50071, and the phytopathogen Pectobacterium carovotorum DSM 102074 were used as test bacterial strains. The strains were previously stored at −30 °C in sterile Luria Bertani (LB) broth (Sigma) supplemented with 20% sterile glycerol (Sigma). Bacteria were thawed and added (inoculum 2%) to LB broth. E. coli, L. monocytogenes, and P. aeruginosa were grown for 18 h at 37 °C and 80 rpm (Corning LSE, Pisa, Italy). P. carotovorum was grown at 28 °C and 80 rpm. Fresh cultures were used as inoculum (2% final concentration) and grown in the conditions described above.

2.2. Minimal Inhibitory Concentration (MIC)

The MIC values were calculated using the resazurin microtiter-plate assay [13]. Multiwell plates were prepared in triplicate and incubated at 37 °C for 24 h. The lowest concentration at which a color change occurred (from dark purple to colorless) revealed the MIC value.

2.3. Biofilm Inhibitory Activity

The effect of the prickly pear seeds oil on bacterial ability to form biofilm was assessed according to the method of O’Toole and Kolter [14] in flat-bottomed 96-well microtiter plates, using volumes of the oil (previously dissolved in sterile DMSO) ranging from 1 to 8 μL/mL. The overnight bacterial cultures were adjusted to 0.5 McFarland with fresh culture broth. Then, 10 μL of the diluted cultures was distributed in each well, and different volumes of the oil and sterile Luria-Bertani broth were added to reach a final volume of 250 μL/well. Microplates were completely covered with parafilm tape to avoid the evaporation of samples with relative loss of volume and incubated for 48 h at different temperatures (depending on the strain). Planktonic cells were removed and the attached cells were gently washed twice with sterile physiological saline. After that, 200 μL of methanol was added to each well, retaining it for 15 min to fix the sessile cells. Methanol was then discarded, and each plate was left until complete dryness of samples. The staining of the adhered cells was obtained by adding 200 μL of 2% w/v crystal violet solution to each well that was left for 20 min. Wells were gently washed with sterile physiological solution and left to dry. Two hundred microliters of glacial acetic acid 20% w/v were added to allow the release of the bound dye. The absorbance was measured at OD = 540 nm (Varian Cary Spectrophotometer model 50 MPR, Cernusco sul Naviglio, Italy). The percent value of biofilm inhibition was calculated with respect to control (cells grown without the presence of the EOs). The average results from triplicate tests were taken for reproducibility.

2.4. Metabolic Activity of Biofilm Cells

The effect of different volumes of prickly pear seeds oil, ranging from 1 to 8 μL/mL on the metabolic activity of biofilm cells, was evaluated through the MTT colorimetric method [15,16] using 96-well microtiter plates. The overnight bacterial cultures were adjusted to 0.5 McFarland and treated as described in Section “Biofilm Inhibitory Activity.” After 48 h incubation, bacterial suspension was removed and 150 μL of sterile PBS and 30 μL of 0.3% MTT (Sigma, Milan, Italy) were added, keeping microplates at 37 °C. After 2 h, the MTT solution was removed, two washing steps were performed gently with 200 μL of sterile physiological solution, and 200 μL of DMSO was added to allow the dissolution of the formazan crystals, which were measured at OD = 570 nm (Varian). Triplicate tests were carried out and the average results were taken for reproducibility.

3. Results and Discussion

Based on the minimal inhibitory activity exhibited by the prickly pear seeds oil (Table 1), we provided to evaluate the potential effect that different volumes of this oil could have on the formation of biofilm of some pathogenic bacteria and assessed if the oil could exhibit some inhibitory effect also on the metabolism of the cells included in the biofilm.
The data acquired showed that the O. ficus-indica seeds oil has an interesting capability to inhibit the growth of different pathogens, confirming previous studies which demonstrated the effectiveness of this oil in inhibiting the growth of different Gram-positive and Gram-negative negative pathogens [10,17,18]. To our knowledge, this is the first time that the possible capability of the oil to inhibit the formation of biofilms by pathogenic microorganisms was evaluated. Therefore, it is also the first time that the effect of the oil on the metabolism of microbial cells trapped inside the biofilm has been studied. Results are shown in Table 2 and Table 3, respectively.
E. coli and P. carotovorum were sensitive to the action of the oil even when we tested one μL/mL, which caused an inhibition of the biofilm of 36.77% and 43.33%, respectively (Table 2).
Such action was much more incisive when we used 8 μL/mL: in this case, we detected percentages of biofilm inhibition of 63.06% (P. carotovorum) and 75.79% (E. coli). Ps. aeruginosa, which also proved to be resistant to the action of 1 μL/mL of the oil, showed percentages of biofilm inhibition that reached 73.84% using 8 μL/mL of the oil instead.
The metabolic activity of the microbial cells present within the biofilm was also strongly inhibited (Table 3) and, when the oil was tested against P. carotovorum, the microbial cell metabolism was completely inhibited.
A similar behavior was exhibited by E. coli, which cell metabolism was almost completely inhibited (96.26%) using 8 μL/mL of the oil. The action of the prickly pear seeds oil was effective also in blocking at 64.97% the metabolism of L. monocytogenes cells, which therefore had conversely demonstrated to be more resistant compared to the other bacteria (31% of biofilm inhibition when we tested the highest volume of the O. ficus-indica seeds oil). This could suggest that, conversely to a general higher resistance exhibited by the Gram-negative bacteria to biocides [19], the Gram-positive strain used in these experiments, that is L. monocytogenes, could be slightly more resistant, for the same volume of oil used, during the biofilm formation phase, but not from a metabolic point of view. The activity exhibited by the oil against the phytopathogen P. carotovorum makes it a candidate to treat and prevent bacterial infections in crops for instance using new species-specific technologies, such as the encapsulation of the oil in mesoporous silica nanoparticles [20]. Data from the present study indicate an interesting applicative versatility of this oil, with potentialities for food, agriculture, and health purposes.

Author Contributions

F.N., V.D.F., and R.C.: conceptualization. F.N., A.d., F.F., and L.C.: investigations. All authors contributed to writing and revising the manuscript. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Pimienta-Barrios, E.; Barbera, G.; Inglese, P. Cactus pear (Opuntia spp. Cactaceae) International Network: An effort for productivity and environmental conservation for arid and semiarid lands. Cactus Succul. J. 1993, 65, 225–229. [Google Scholar]
  2. Stintzing, F.C.; Schieber, A.; Carle, R. Cactus pear, a promising component of functional food. Gemüse Kartoff. 2000, 85, 40–47. [Google Scholar]
  3. Ramadan, M.F.; Mörsel, J.-T. Oil cactus pear (Opuntia ficus-indica L.). Food Chem. 2003, 82, 339–345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Bhatt, M.R.; Nagar, P.S. Evaluation of physicochemical property and fatty acid composition of Opuntia elatior seed oil. J. Prof. Ass. Cactus Dev. 2013, 15, 13–19. [Google Scholar]
  5. El-Mostafa, K.; Kharrassi, Y.; Badreddine, A.; Andreoletti, P.; Vamecq, J.; El Kebbaj, M.S.; Latruffe, N.; Lizard, G.; Nasser, B.; Charkaoui-Malki, M. Nopal Cactus (Opuntia ficus-indica) as a source of bioactive compounds for nutrition, health and disease. Molecules 2014, 19, 14879–14901. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Ghazi, Z.; Ramdai, M.; Fauconnier, M.L.; El Mahi, B.; Cheikh, R. Fatty acids, sterols and Vitamin E composition of seed oil of Opuntia ficus indica and Opuntia dilenii from Morocco. J. Mater. Environ. Sci. 2013, 4, 967–972. [Google Scholar]
  7. Labuschagne, M.T.; Hugo, A. Oil content and fatty acid composition of cactus pear seed compared with cotton and grape seed. J. Food. Biochem. 2010, 34, 93–100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Mensink, R.P.; Katan, M.B. Effect of dietary trans fatty acids on high-density and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels in healthy subjects. N. Engl. J. Med. 1992, 323, 439–445. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Kaur, M.; Kaur, A.; Sharma, R. Pharmacological actions of Opuntia ficus indica: A review. J. Appl. Pharm. Sci. 2012, 2, 15–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Ortega, M.D.L.A.O.; Cruz-Cansino, N.D.S.; Alanís-García, E.; Delgado-Olivares, L.; Ariza-Ortega, J.A.; Ramírez-Moreno, E.; Manríquez-Torres, J.J. Optimization of ultrasound extraction of cactus pear (Opuntia ficus indica) seed oil based on antioxidant activity and evaluation of its antimicrobial activity. J. Food Qual. 2017, 9315360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Palmeri, R.; Parafati, L.; Restuccia, C.; Fallico, B. Application of prickly pear fruit extract to improve domestic shelf life, quality and microbial safety of sliced beef. Food Chem. Toxicol. 2018, 118, 355–360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Blando, F.; Russo, R.; Negro, C.; De Bellis, L.; Frassinetti, S. Polyphenolic extracts from cladodes of Opuntia ficus-indica (L.) Mill. to inhibit the growth of some enterobacteria and the biofilm formation by Staphylococcus aureus. Antioxidants 2019, 8, 117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Sarker, S.D.; Nahar, L.; Kumarasamy, Y. Microtitre plate-based antibacterial assay incorporating resazurin as an indicator of cell growth, and its application in the in vitro antibacterial screening of phytochemicals. Methods 2007, 42, 321–324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. O’Toole, G.A.; Kolter, R. Flagellar and twitching motility are necessary for Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilm development. Mol. Microbiol. 1998, 30, 295–304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Kairo, S.K.; Bedwell, J.; Tyler, P.C.; Carter, A.; Corbel, M.J. Development of a tetrazolium salt assay for rapid determination of viability of BCG vaccines. Vaccine 1999, 17, 2423–2428. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Fratianni, F.; Cozzolino, A.; De Feo, V.; Coppola, R.; Ombra, M.N.; Nazzaro, F. Polyphenols, antioxidant, antibacterial, and biofilm inhibitory activities of peel and pulp of Citrus medica L., Citrus bergamia, and Citrus medica cv. Salò Cultivated in Southern Italy. Molecules 2019, 24, 4577. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. R’bia, O.; Chkioua, C.; Hellal, R.; Herchi, W.; Aschi Smiti, S. Antioxidant and antibacterial activities of Opuntia ficus indica seed oil fractions and their bioactive compounds identification. Turk. J. Biochem. 2017, 42, 481–491. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Ramírez-Moreno, E.; Cariño-Cortés, R.; del Socorro Cruz-Cansino, N.; Delgado-Olivares, L.; Ariza-Ortega, J.A.; Montañez-Izquierdo, V.Y.; Hernández-Herrero, M.M.; Filardo-Kerstupp, T. Antioxidant and Antimicrobial Properties of Cactus Pear (Opuntia) Seed Oils. J. Food Qual. 2017, 3075907. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Nazzaro, F.; Fratianni, F.; De Martino, L.; Coppola, R.; De Feo, V. Effect of essential oils on pathogenic bacteria. Pharmaceuticals 2013, 6, 1451–1474. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Cadena, M.B.; Preston, G.M.; Van der Hoorn, R.A.L.; Townley, H.E.; Thompson, I.P. Species-specific antimicrobial activity of essential oils and enhancement by encapsulation in mesoporous silica nanoparticles. Ind. Crops Prod. 2018, 122, 582–590. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Table 1. Minimal inhibitory concentration (μL/mL) of the prickly pear seeds oil evaluated through the resazurin test, as reported in the Materials and Methods.
Table 1. Minimal inhibitory concentration (μL/mL) of the prickly pear seeds oil evaluated through the resazurin test, as reported in the Materials and Methods.
StrainMIC (mL/mL)
E. coli10.0 (±1.0)
L. monocytogenes15.0 (±2.0)
P. carotovorum12.0 (±1.0)
Ps. aeruginosa11.0 (±1.0)
Table 2. Inhibitory action of Opuntia ficus-indica seeds oil on the formation of biofilm. Results are reported as percent of inhibition respect to the control (% = 0). They are the mean (± SD) of three experiments.
Table 2. Inhibitory action of Opuntia ficus-indica seeds oil on the formation of biofilm. Results are reported as percent of inhibition respect to the control (% = 0). They are the mean (± SD) of three experiments.
1 μL/mL2 μL/mL4 μL/mL8 μL/mL
E. coli36.77 (3.31)62.56 (2.79)68.03 (1.90)75.79 (1.98)
L. monocytogenes0 (0)16.27 (1.52)24.66 (1.67)31.18 (1.94)
P. carotovorum43.33 (0.57)31.01 (4.3)56.99 (1.67)63.06 (1.13)
P. aeruginosa0 (0)41.34 (1.13)44.26 (0.35)73.84 (0.9)
Table 3. Metabolic activity exhibited by the cells present within the bacterial biofilms in the presence of different volumes of O. ficus indica seeds oil. Results are reported as percent of inhibition respect to the control (% = 0). They are the mean (± SD) of three experiments.
Table 3. Metabolic activity exhibited by the cells present within the bacterial biofilms in the presence of different volumes of O. ficus indica seeds oil. Results are reported as percent of inhibition respect to the control (% = 0). They are the mean (± SD) of three experiments.
1 mL/mL2 mL/mL4 mL/mL8 mL/mL
E. coli81.98 (1.13)84.45 (0.57)91.16 (0.33)96.26 (0.33)
L. monocytogenes0 (0)38.83 (1.52)61.23 (1.67)64.97 (1.13)
P. carotovorum22.21 (0.57)76.06 (0.57)95.25 (0.33)98.35 (0.33)
P. aeruginosa0 (0)31.41 (0.57)53.42 (1.13)64.33 (1.90)
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Nazzaro, F.; Fratianni, F.; d’Acierno, A.; Caputo, L.; Feo, V.D.; Coppola, R. Antibiofilm Properties Exhibited by the Prickly Pear (Opuntia ficus-indica) Seed Oil. Proceedings 2020, 66, 29. https://doi.org/10.3390/proceedings2020066029

AMA Style

Nazzaro F, Fratianni F, d’Acierno A, Caputo L, Feo VD, Coppola R. Antibiofilm Properties Exhibited by the Prickly Pear (Opuntia ficus-indica) Seed Oil. Proceedings. 2020; 66(1):29. https://doi.org/10.3390/proceedings2020066029

Chicago/Turabian Style

Nazzaro, Filomena, Florinda Fratianni, Antonio d’Acierno, Lucia Caputo, Vincenzo De Feo, and Raffaele Coppola. 2020. "Antibiofilm Properties Exhibited by the Prickly Pear (Opuntia ficus-indica) Seed Oil" Proceedings 66, no. 1: 29. https://doi.org/10.3390/proceedings2020066029

APA Style

Nazzaro, F., Fratianni, F., d’Acierno, A., Caputo, L., Feo, V. D., & Coppola, R. (2020). Antibiofilm Properties Exhibited by the Prickly Pear (Opuntia ficus-indica) Seed Oil. Proceedings, 66(1), 29. https://doi.org/10.3390/proceedings2020066029

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop