Next Article in Journal
Consolidation of Acrylic and Oil-Based Paintings with Cellulose Nanofibers
Previous Article in Journal
Immobilization of Metal Selective Ligands upon Polymer Nanofibers: Successes and Challenges
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Extended Abstract

Voltammetric Behaviour of Hesperidin at a Composite Graphite Electrode †

by
Nimet Numan
*,
Iulia Gabriela David
,
Mihaela Buleandră
,
Dana Elena Popa
and
Emilia Elena Iorgulescu
Department of Analytical Chemistry, Faculty of Chemistry, University of Bucharest, 90-92 Panduri Av., District 5, 050633 Bucharest, Romania
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Presented at the 16th International Symposium “Priorities of Chemistry for a Sustainable Development” PRIOCHEM, Bucharest, Romania, 28–30 October 2020.
Proceedings 2020, 57(1), 68; https://doi.org/10.3390/proceedings2020057068
Published: 13 November 2020
Flavonoids are natural antioxidants with important roles in plant growth and human health. They are polyphenols with a benzene-γ-pyrone structure, the hydroxyl groups grafted on the conjugated benzene rings being responsible for their antioxidant and electrochemical activity. Thus, electrochemical studies on the electrode reactions of these compounds can give a significant insight into their action mechanism as antioxidants [1]. Hesperidin (HESP) is a flavone glycoside found predominantly in the peel of citrus fruits. Literature reports voltammetric determination of HESP on mercury or different carbon-based electrodes [2], but none of the studies refers to the cost-effective and easy-to-use pencil graphite electrode (PGE) (Figure 1). This work presents for the first time HESP voltammetric behaviour at PGE.
An amount of 10−3 M HESP stock solution was daily prepared by dissolving the proper amount of HESP in 2 mL 0.2 M NaOH and subsequent dilution with bidistilled water to 10 mL. The working solutions were obtained by successive dilutions of the stock solution with the corresponding supporting electrolyte. A PC running GPES 4.9 software and the Autolab PGSTAT 12 system equipped with a three-electrode cell (working electrode: PGE) were used for voltammetric recordings.
The voltammetric response of HESP was investigated by differential pulse voltammetry (DPV) at different working electrodes (Pt, glassy carbon, and PGE with different types of pencil leads). Graphite leads are composite materials consisting of graphite powder (~60%), clay (~30%), and a binder (resin or a high polymer) [3]. The hardness of the composite graphite leads (2H, H, HB, 2B, and B) decreases when the graphite content is higher. The harder H type graphite composite material exhibited the highest sensitivity (0.743 A × L/mol × cm2) for HESP voltammetric determination. PGE potentiostatic/potentiodynamic electrochemical activation in different media did not enhance the HESP DPV signal. Both oxidation signals of HESP were shifted towards lower potential values when the solution pH was increased indicating that an equal number of electrons and protons are involved, the highest DPV signals being recorded in Britton Robinson Buffer pH 1.81. HESP cyclic voltammograms present a controlled diffusion oxidation peak at about 0.78 V and signal at about 0.48 V due to a diffusion–adsorption-controlled reduction in HESP oxidation product in the first scan.
The highest and best-shaped voltammetric response of HESP was observed at type H composite leads, having a lower graphite content. HESP oxidation is pH-dependent and diffusion-controlled, involving an equal number of electrons and protons.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by University of Bucharest, research grand number 20045/2018.

References

  1. Masek, A.; Zaborski, M.; Chrzescijanska, E. Electrooxidation of flavonoids at platinum electrode studied by cyclic voltammetry. Food Chem. 2011, 127, 699–704. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Sims, M.J.; Li, Q.; Kachoosangi, R.T.; Wildgoose, G.G.; Compton, R.G. Using multiwalled carbon nanotube modified electrodes for the adsorptive striping voltammetric determination of hesperidin. Electrochim. Acta 2009, 54, 5030–5034. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. David, I.; Popa, D.; Buleandra, M. Pencil graphite electrodes: A versatile tool in electroanalysis. J. Anal. Methods Chem. 2017, 2017, 1905968. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. The composite pencil graphite electrode (PGE).
Figure 1. The composite pencil graphite electrode (PGE).
Proceedings 57 00068 g001
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Numan, N.; David, I.G.; Buleandră, M.; Popa, D.E.; Iorgulescu, E.E. Voltammetric Behaviour of Hesperidin at a Composite Graphite Electrode. Proceedings 2020, 57, 68. https://doi.org/10.3390/proceedings2020057068

AMA Style

Numan N, David IG, Buleandră M, Popa DE, Iorgulescu EE. Voltammetric Behaviour of Hesperidin at a Composite Graphite Electrode. Proceedings. 2020; 57(1):68. https://doi.org/10.3390/proceedings2020057068

Chicago/Turabian Style

Numan, Nimet, Iulia Gabriela David, Mihaela Buleandră, Dana Elena Popa, and Emilia Elena Iorgulescu. 2020. "Voltammetric Behaviour of Hesperidin at a Composite Graphite Electrode" Proceedings 57, no. 1: 68. https://doi.org/10.3390/proceedings2020057068

APA Style

Numan, N., David, I. G., Buleandră, M., Popa, D. E., & Iorgulescu, E. E. (2020). Voltammetric Behaviour of Hesperidin at a Composite Graphite Electrode. Proceedings, 57(1), 68. https://doi.org/10.3390/proceedings2020057068

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop