Next Article in Journal
Teeth Extractions in Subjects Undergoing Radiotherapy for Head and Neck Cancers: A Systematic Review on the Clinical Protocols for Preventing Osteoradionecrosis (ORN). Extractions after Radiotherapy (Part 2)
Previous Article in Journal
Application of Ozone Therapy in the Conservative Surgical Treatment of Osteonecrosis of the Jaw: Preliminary Results
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Extended Abstract

Persistent Oral Erosion: A Diagnostic Challange †

Department of Oncology, Unit of Oral Medicine and Oral Oncology, University of Turin, San Luigi Gonzaga Hospital, 001171 Orbassano, Italy
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Presented at the XV National and III International Congress of the Italian Society of Oral Pathology and Medicine (SIPMO), Bari, Italy, 17–19 October 2019.
Proceedings 2019, 35(1), 10; https://doi.org/10.3390/proceedings2019035010
Published: 11 December 2019
The diagnosis and treatment of oral erosion/ulceration is often challenging due to the clinician’s limited exposure to the conditions that may cause the lesions and their similar appearances. While many oral ulcers and erosions are the result of chronic trauma, some may indicate an underlying systemic condition such as a gastrointestinal dysfunction, malignancy, immunologic abnormality, or cutaneous disease. Correctly establishing a definitive diagnosis is of major importance to clinicians who manage patients with oral mucosal disease [1].
A 77-year-old male edentulous former smoker (stopped in 1962) suffering of hypertension, angina and glaucoma in pharmacological treatment, was admitted to our Oral Medicine and Oral Oncology Clinic on January 2010 with severe and persistent eroded lesions noticed 3 months prior to his visit (Figure 1A). Lesions involved the left buccal mucosa; extending to left labial commissure and the vermillion. No other lesions could be detected at an oral and cutaneous examination. Map biopsies under Velscope® guide were performed but the pathological assessment didn’t highlight any alteration in the oral mucosa. Miconazole 2% gel (3 applications per day per 15 days) and Chlortetracycline 3% ointment (3 applications per day per 15 days) treatment improved the clinical aspect of the lesion. After 3 months since the erosion didn’t show up any more improvement, the patient underwent cryosurgery. A nearly complete regression of the erosion was obtained (Figure 1B). On March 2011, meanwhile two new denture were performed, a worsening of the clinical aspect and of the symptoms had led to the execution of new biopsy samples, which highlighted the presence of mild-moderate dysplasia (Figure 1C). The patient decided to do not perform the excision, so a new biopsy was performed on November 2011(Figure 1D). The pathological assessment showed the presence of an in situ carcinoma. The patient underwent photodynamic therapy in 2012. During the follow-up on March 2013 (Figure 1E) a new severe worsening appeared, with the involvement of the buccal mucosa and also of the skin of the labial commissure by erosion with scabs. The histologic examination ruled out a relapse. Until 2016 the erosion changed several time his clinical aspect. Hematological and Quantiferon exams were required, but they excluded a Tuberculosis infection and a lymphoproliferative disorder. Several pharmacological treatments (antimicotic and antibiotic topical use) couldn’t heal the lesion, biopsies were repeated in the years (September 2013 (Figure 1F,G), March 2014) until April 2016 (Figure 1H,I) when the pathological assessment disclosed a mild dysplasia. Because of the worsening of the systemic condition of the patient (since 2015 the patient was suffering of Alzheimer disease), according with the son of the patient, was decided to keep only clinical follow-up. On August 2017 the patient died due to a complication of senile dementia.
Diagnosis of oral erosion-ulceration can be challenging and requires careful clinical examination and history taking. Persistent oral ulcerations can result from a variety of disparate etiologies and, therefore, may pose a diagnostic challenge. Historically, the diagnosis of many of these conditions has been made based only on clinical presentation, sometimes along with tissue biopsy [2]. However, not every case will present the typical clinical or histological features associated with a certain condition. The management of many of these conditions has been similarly nonspecific, often involving non-targeted anti-inflammatory or immunosuppressive agents.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Bilodeau, E.A.; Lalla, R.V. Recurrent oral ulceration: Etiology, classification, management, and diagnostic algorithm. Periodontol 2000 2019, 80, 49–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Siu, A.; Landon, K.; Ramos, D.M. Differential diagnosis and management of oral ulcers. Semin. Cutan. Med. Surg. 2015, 34, 171–177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. (A) Clinical aspects of the buccal mucosa lesion at first examination January 2010. (B) Erosion healing after cryotherapy on June 2010. (C) Worsening of the erosion on May 2011 with a pathological assessment of mild-moderate dysplasia. (D) November 2011 in situ carcinoma. (E) After photodinamic therapy a relapse of the erosion was highlighted on March 2013 with a pathological assessment of dense inflammatory infiltrate of plasma cells without dysplasia. (F,G) September 2013: worsening of the lesion with a skin’s involvement, biopsies ruled out the presence of dysplasia. (H,I) April 2016: Enlargement of the lesion with the presence of mild dysplasia.
Figure 1. (A) Clinical aspects of the buccal mucosa lesion at first examination January 2010. (B) Erosion healing after cryotherapy on June 2010. (C) Worsening of the erosion on May 2011 with a pathological assessment of mild-moderate dysplasia. (D) November 2011 in situ carcinoma. (E) After photodinamic therapy a relapse of the erosion was highlighted on March 2013 with a pathological assessment of dense inflammatory infiltrate of plasma cells without dysplasia. (F,G) September 2013: worsening of the lesion with a skin’s involvement, biopsies ruled out the presence of dysplasia. (H,I) April 2016: Enlargement of the lesion with the presence of mild dysplasia.
Proceedings 35 00010 g001
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Val, M.; Lupatelli, M.; Ardore, M.; Marino, R.; Pentenero, M. Persistent Oral Erosion: A Diagnostic Challange. Proceedings 2019, 35, 10. https://doi.org/10.3390/proceedings2019035010

AMA Style

Val M, Lupatelli M, Ardore M, Marino R, Pentenero M. Persistent Oral Erosion: A Diagnostic Challange. Proceedings. 2019; 35(1):10. https://doi.org/10.3390/proceedings2019035010

Chicago/Turabian Style

Val, Matteo, Melania Lupatelli, Marco Ardore, Roberto Marino, and Monica Pentenero. 2019. "Persistent Oral Erosion: A Diagnostic Challange" Proceedings 35, no. 1: 10. https://doi.org/10.3390/proceedings2019035010

APA Style

Val, M., Lupatelli, M., Ardore, M., Marino, R., & Pentenero, M. (2019). Persistent Oral Erosion: A Diagnostic Challange. Proceedings, 35(1), 10. https://doi.org/10.3390/proceedings2019035010

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop