Next Article in Journal
Surface Properties of SnO2 Nanolayers Deposited by Rheotaxial Growth and Vacuum Oxidation for Potential Gas Sensor Applications
Previous Article in Journal
Selective Gas Sensor Based on Metal Oxide Nanostructure
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Proceeding Paper

Testing the Reliability of Flexible MOX Gas Sensors under Strain †

1
MINOS-EMaS, Departament d’Enginyeria Electrònica, Elèctrica i Automàtica, Universitat Rovira i Virgili, 43007 Tarragona, Spain
2
Departament d’Enginyeria Mecànica, Universitat Rovira i Virgili, Av. Països Catalans 26, 43007 Tarragona, Spain
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Presented at the 8th GOSPEL Workshop, Gas Sensors Based on Semiconducting Metal Oxides: Basic Understanding & Application Fields, Ferrara, Italy, 20–21 June 2019.
Proceedings 2019, 14(1), 20; https://doi.org/10.3390/proceedings2019014020
Published: 19 June 2019

Abstract

:
We present flexible chemo-resistive sensors based on AACVD grown tungsten trioxide (WO3) nanowires. The sensor response to gases, before and after a 50-cycle bending test, is reported. Thus, proving that reliable gas sensors, able to withstand repeated bending, have been achieved. Moreover, their integrity and durability have been tested under harsh bending conditions until break down.

1. Background

Flexible sensors are a promising technology for personal environmental monitoring, sports or healthcare and medicine. These applications involve using wearables, which are attached to the body or clothes to sense different variables, including gases. The use of flexible substrates improves the performance in these systems [1]. However, usually, little or no information is given on reliability. Here, metal oxide nanowire gas sensors over polymeric foil, have been developed and their performance after repeated mechanical stress test has been evaluated.

2. Materials and Methods

The sensor architecture consists of one electrode and one coplanar heater over a polymeric substrate (Kapton® 50.5 µm thick) as used in [2]. There is a layer of WO3 nanowires coating the active area (Figure 1). Electrode and heater patterns were stenciled using silver ink as reported in [3]. The WO3 layer was grown directly on the flexible substrate via an aerosol assisted chemical vapor deposition in a hot (350 °C) wall reactor. Precursors used were tungsten hexacarbonyl dissolved in a mixture of acetone and methanol, as reported in [4].
We made a controlled bending test using an electromechanical universal testing machine (Shimadzu AGS-X 10 kN). Sensors were strained up to 15% and the maximum deflection due to buckling was d = 3.23 mm. The test consisted of 50 continuous moves of the upper grip. Each move was 2 mm down and up, at 20 mm/min, producing a curvature radius of approx. 3.1 mm (Figure 2). Meanwhile, the electrical resistance of the active layer, the stroke and the force applied were measured.

3. Results

The AACVD process resulted in the direct growth onto the transducer of WO3 nanowires (150 nm in diameter and 10 microns in length). Sensors were tested against H2 before and after the bending test. In both cases, three cycles of three H2 concentrations (250, 500 and 750 ppm) were tested, at a heater mean temperature of 150 °C. Sensor response after the bending test (Figure 3) shows small changes (after bending test baseline electrical resistance increased by 5.5% Figure 4, which can be easily calibrated). An additional test was carried out until the sensing layer was damaged: the electrical resistance increased significantly at zero stroke. This occurred after 200 bending cycles: 100 under compressive strain and 100 under tension strain, with a shift of 4 mm and d = 4.3 mm of maximum deflection (curvature radius 3.2 mm).

4. Conclusions

We have proved that is possible to produce reliable flexible sensors with a very affordable technology. After a 50-cycles bending test, under tensile strain, sensor response remains almost unchanged. Moreover, the limits of the physical system have been tested under harsh bending conditions. The sensors could withstand up to 200 bending cycles before losing functionality. This is being developed further via the design of in-house made metal oxide inks for achieving fully printed functional devices. Characterization results will be presented at the conference.

Funding

This research was funded in part by MINECO and FEDER under grant no. TEC2015-71663-R and by AGAUR under grant no. 2017 SGR 418.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript, or in the decision to publish the results.

References

  1. Nag, A.; Mukhopadhyay, S.C.; Kosel, J. Wearable flexible sensors: A review. IEEE Sens. J. 2017, 17, 3949. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Ramírez, J.L.; Annanouch, F.E.; Llobet, E.; Briand, D. Architecture for the efficient manufacturing by printing of heated, planar, resistive transducers on polymeric foil for gas sensing. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2018, 258, 952–960. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Alvarado, M.; Navarrete, E.; Romero, A.; Ramírez, J.L.; Llobet, E. Flexible Gas sensors employing octahedral indium oxide films. Sensors 2018, 18, 999. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Vallejos, S.; Umek, P.; Blackman, C. Aerosol assisted chemical vapour deposition control parameters for selective deposition of tungsten oxide nanostructures. J. Nanosci. Nanotechnol. 2011, 11, 8214–8220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Device layout. Left: electrode and heater. Right: active layer over both elements. Device size 14 × 14 mm2.
Figure 1. Device layout. Left: electrode and heater. Right: active layer over both elements. Device size 14 × 14 mm2.
Proceedings 14 00020 g001
Figure 2. Universal testing machine grips holding the sensor. D = maximum deflection distance.
Figure 2. Universal testing machine grips holding the sensor. D = maximum deflection distance.
Proceedings 14 00020 g002
Figure 3. (a) Current through active layer at different concentrations of H2 (250, 500 and 750 ppm H2) and (b) Sensor response to H2 concentration, before and after 50 repeated bending tests.
Figure 3. (a) Current through active layer at different concentrations of H2 (250, 500 and 750 ppm H2) and (b) Sensor response to H2 concentration, before and after 50 repeated bending tests.
Proceedings 14 00020 g003
Figure 4. Percentage of sensor resistance increase during 50-cycles bending test.
Figure 4. Percentage of sensor resistance increase during 50-cycles bending test.
Proceedings 14 00020 g004
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Alvarado, M.; Romero, A.; Ramírez, J.L.; Flor, S.D.l.; Llobet, E. Testing the Reliability of Flexible MOX Gas Sensors under Strain. Proceedings 2019, 14, 20. https://doi.org/10.3390/proceedings2019014020

AMA Style

Alvarado M, Romero A, Ramírez JL, Flor SDl, Llobet E. Testing the Reliability of Flexible MOX Gas Sensors under Strain. Proceedings. 2019; 14(1):20. https://doi.org/10.3390/proceedings2019014020

Chicago/Turabian Style

Alvarado, M., A. Romero, J.L. Ramírez, S. De la Flor, and E. Llobet. 2019. "Testing the Reliability of Flexible MOX Gas Sensors under Strain" Proceedings 14, no. 1: 20. https://doi.org/10.3390/proceedings2019014020

APA Style

Alvarado, M., Romero, A., Ramírez, J. L., Flor, S. D. l., & Llobet, E. (2019). Testing the Reliability of Flexible MOX Gas Sensors under Strain. Proceedings, 14(1), 20. https://doi.org/10.3390/proceedings2019014020

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop