Sustainability reporting in the private sector has evolved significantly over the past three decades, moving from ad hoc environmental disclosures to comprehensive frameworks that integrate environmental, social, and governance (ESG) considerations into corporate strategy and stakeholder communication. This paper presents a critical review of the evolution of sustainability-reporting frameworks within the energy sector, examining how global standards have developed in response to changing regulatory landscapes, investor expectations, and corporate accountability demands.
Focusing on key frameworks, including the Global Reporting Initiative (GRI), Sustainability Accounting Standards Board (SASB), Integrated Reporting (IR), Task Force on Climate-related Financial Disclosures (TCFD), Science Based Targets Initiative (STBi) and the International Sustainability Standards Board (ISSB), the paper explores trends in standard-setting, the push toward harmonisation, and challenges around comparability, materiality, and assurance. The analysis is based on a temporal bracketing on identified published reports and studies on these reporting frameworks. Key impact events are further explored to map the evolution of different reporting frameworks and underpinning drivers within fossil fuel organisations in the Australian Context. Through a comparative analysis, the study highlights how these fossil fuel sector entities have adopted and interpreted sustainability reporting frameworks, organisational differences in reporting practices, and the strategic motivations behind ESG disclosure. The paper concludes by reflecting on the future trajectory of sustainability reporting in the sector and its potential role in accelerating sustainable business transformation and aligning with global sustainability goals.
Author Contributions
Conceptualization, N.W.; methodology, N.W.; validation, L.D.W.T. and J.V.; formal analysis, N.W.; writing—original draft preparation, N.W.; writing—review and editing, L.D.W.T. and J.V.; visualization, N.W.; supervision, L.D.W.T. and J.V.; funding acquisition, N.W. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Funding
This research is funded by the Australian Research Training Program.
Institutional Review Board Statement
Not applicable.
Informed Consent Statement
Not applicable.
Data Availability Statement
Data can be made available upon request.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2025 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).