Next Article in Journal
A Novel 3D Infrared Tomographic Technology Based on Undersampling and Line-Scanned Structured Heating
Previous Article in Journal
Laser Thermography as Non-Destructive Technique to Detect Defects in AlSi10Mg Parts Printed with L-PBF Process
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Abstract

Nondestructive Testing of Joint by Active Infrared Thermography †

Mechanical Engineering Program, Graduate School of Advanced Science and Engineering, Higashi-Hiroshima cumpus, Hiroshima University, 1-4-1 Kagamiyama, Higashi-Hiroshima 739-8527, Hiroshima, Japan
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Presented at the 18th International Workshop on Advanced Infrared Technology and Applications (AITA 2025), Kobe, Japan, 15–19 September 2025.
Proceedings 2025, 129(1), 43; https://doi.org/10.3390/proceedings2025129043
Published: 12 September 2025

Abstract

As part of recent measures to combat global warming, automobiles are required to be electrified and their weight reduced, leading to the advancement of multi-material structures that include aluminum alloys and aluminum die castings. Conventional fusion welding methods for joining aluminum alloys and steel materials have poor joining performance due to differences in thermal conductivity between the materials and the presence of oxide films. Friction stir welding (FSW) has been attracting attention in recent years because it is a solid-phase joining method and can also be used to join dissimilar materials. In this study, FSW overlay joints were fabricated: Aluminum alloy AA6111 was used for the upper plate, AA6061 was used for the lower plate. Non-destructive testing was performed on each joint to instantly inspect and visualize joint defects. In the case of FSW joints, no difference was observed in the heat transfer process when the joints were heated directly, but the location of the hooking could be identified by heating from a distance from the joints. The results of the analysis of the temperature change at the defect location showed a difference in heat propagation.

1. Introduction

The automotive industry is aiming to improve fuel efficiency through electrification and reduction in vehicle weight, as well as to improve collision performance in order to comply with stricter collision safety regulations. Multi-material structures incorporating lightweight aluminum alloys and aluminum die castings are becoming increasingly common in automobiles. Resistance spot welding employed in conventional joining techniques for car bodies is unreliable for joining dissimilar materials using aluminum alloys due to differences in thermal conductivity between the materials and the formation of brittle intermetallic compounds during joining. Moreover, mechanical joining techniques are employed, but these techniques require additional materials such as rivets, resulting in an increase in the weight of the car body. Friction stir welding (FSW) is a technique for joining dissimilar materials using the frictional heat and plastic flow generated during joining. In the case of overlapping FSW joints for aluminum alloys, hooking occurs inside the joint, as shown in Figure 1, and fatigue crack in the joints occurs from this hooking. Thus, it is important to identify the location and shape of the hooking to estimate the fatigue damage behavior of the joints. This study proposed active infrared thermography using the thermal energy of a laser as a heating source to establish a nondestructive inspection method to identify the locations and shapes of hooking and defects inherent in the joint. Laser heating conditions were employed to consider the high thermal conductivity of aluminum alloys, as described later, and the results were compared with the reflection method employed in conventional active infrared thermography.

2. Experimental Procedure

2.1. Materials

This study employed two types of wrought aluminum alloys (AA6111 with a thickness of 2 mm and AA6061-T6 with a thickness of 3 mm). FSW lap joints were positioned on the upper and lower plates made of AA6111 and A6061, respectively, with a lap length of 40 mm. An FSW tool with a shoulder diameter of 15 mm, a probe diameter of 5 mm, and a probe length of 3.9 mm was inserted at the center of the lap section. Subsequently, the entire length of 270 mm was joined using FSW. The advancing side of FSW, where the tool’s rotation direction coincides with the advancing direction, is the lower sheet side, and the retreating side, where the tool’s rotation direction does not coincide with the advancing direction, is the upper sheet side.

2.2. Nondestructive Testing of Joints Using Active Infrared Thermography

This study was conducted to perform nondestructive testing using active infrared thermography with laser heating. This method visualizes the cross-sectional state of the object by irradiating the thermal energy of a laser through the object. This results in temperature and phase differences if there are differences in the thermal diffusivity between the sound and defective areas as the laser passes through the object, and the heat transfer process is observed with infrared thermography. Active infrared thermography has the advantage of being a non-contact, easily available measurement method of two-dimensional images. Heating methods in active infrared thermography are either reflection methods, in which the measured surface of the object is heated directly, or transmission methods, in which the measured object is heated from behind. However, it is difficult to determine the temperature difference in materials with high thermal conductivity, such as aluminum alloys, by the reflection method using flash heating and to capture the time variation in the heat transfer process with respect to the thickness of the measured object by the transmission method [1]. Therefore, we considered that the location and shape of the hooking could be determined by heating the laser not directly above the joint but on the lower sheet side of the overlapped joint, as shown in Figure 2, and then capturing the heat conduction process from the lower sheet side. This method is defined as the indirect transmission method and was compared with the reflection method. Since it is difficult to detect the heat transfer process in detail using only the time-series temperature fluctuation of infrared radiation, we performed discrete Fourier analysis (DFT) on the time-series temperature fluctuation data to evaluate the temperature and phase changes in the heat transfer process after laser heating.

3. Results and Discussion

Figure 3 shows the observation results of the cross-section of the joint. In the FSW area, aforementioned hooking and a hollow defect called a wormhole were generated in the plastic flow area during joining. Figure 4 shows the results of nondestructive testing of the joint. From left to right, the figure shows the results of nondestructive testing through an X-ray of the joint and the results of active infrared thermography obtained using the reflection method and indirect transmission method, respectively. From left to right, the results are shown as an infrared image at the maximum temperature and the temperature and phase information analyzed by DFT. First, the locations of defects were identified from the X-ray transmission images, but the location of hooking was not yet identified. Secondly, neither the temperature nor the phase of active infrared thermography using the reflection method showed any difference in heat propagation due to hooking or defects. Additionally, the indirect transmission method showed differences in heat propagation due to hooking and defects, from which the locations of hooking and defects could be identified [2].

4. Conclusions

The results of this study show the possibility of using active infrared thermography to identify the locations of defects inherent in joints. This is achieved by selecting a heating method that is appropriate for the thermal conductivity and thickness of the material selected for nondestructive inspection of the joints. It is also shown that the inspection accuracy could be improved by selecting optimum heating conditions.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, Y.O., H.A. and A.S.; methodology, Y.O. and Y.S.; software, R.N. and R.K.; validation, R.N., R.K. and Y.O.; formal analysis, R.N. and R.K.; investigation, R.N., R.K. and Y.O.; resources, Y.O., H.A. and A.S.; data curation, R.N. and R.K.; writing—original draft preparation, R.N., R.K., Y.O., H.A. and A.S.; writing—review and editing, R.N., Y.O., H.A. and A.S.; visualization, R.N., R.K. and Y.O.; supervision, Y.O. and H.A.; project administration, Y.O. and H.A.; funding acquisition, Y.O. and H.A. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data are contained within the article.

Acknowledgments

Some of the results of this research were obtained through the Smart Battery System Development Project of the Hiroshima Manufacturing Digital Innovation Creation Program, Cabinet Office, Government of Japan. The authors would like to express their gratitude in this regard.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Meola, C.; Carlomagno, G.M.; Squillace, A.; Giorleo, G. The use of infrared thermography for nondestructive evaluation of joints. Infrared Phys. Technol. 2004, 46, 93–99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Saravanan, T.; Lahiri, B.B.; Arunmuthu, K.; Bagavathiappan, S.; Sekhar, A.S.; Pillai, V.P.M.; Philip, J.; Rao, B.P.C.; Jayakumar, T. Non-Destructive Evaluation of Friction Stir Welded Joints by X-ray Radiography and Infrared Thermography. ScienceDirect Procedia Eng. 2014, 86, 469–475. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Cross section of the fatigued FSW joint.
Figure 1. Cross section of the fatigued FSW joint.
Proceedings 129 00043 g001
Figure 2. Indirect transmission method.
Figure 2. Indirect transmission method.
Proceedings 129 00043 g002
Figure 3. Cross section of the fatigued FSW joint.
Figure 3. Cross section of the fatigued FSW joint.
Proceedings 129 00043 g003
Figure 4. Nondestructive testing analysis results.
Figure 4. Nondestructive testing analysis results.
Proceedings 129 00043 g004aProceedings 129 00043 g004b
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Nishifuru, R.; Koda, R.; Ogawa, Y.; Akebono, H.; Sugimoto, Y.; Sugeta, A. Nondestructive Testing of Joint by Active Infrared Thermography. Proceedings 2025, 129, 43. https://doi.org/10.3390/proceedings2025129043

AMA Style

Nishifuru R, Koda R, Ogawa Y, Akebono H, Sugimoto Y, Sugeta A. Nondestructive Testing of Joint by Active Infrared Thermography. Proceedings. 2025; 129(1):43. https://doi.org/10.3390/proceedings2025129043

Chicago/Turabian Style

Nishifuru, Ririka, Ryosuke Koda, Yuki Ogawa, Hiroyuki Akebono, Yukihiro Sugimoto, and Atsushi Sugeta. 2025. "Nondestructive Testing of Joint by Active Infrared Thermography" Proceedings 129, no. 1: 43. https://doi.org/10.3390/proceedings2025129043

APA Style

Nishifuru, R., Koda, R., Ogawa, Y., Akebono, H., Sugimoto, Y., & Sugeta, A. (2025). Nondestructive Testing of Joint by Active Infrared Thermography. Proceedings, 129(1), 43. https://doi.org/10.3390/proceedings2025129043

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop