Abstract
Agitated bioreactors are the subject of many studies regarding their design and scale-up to enhance the productivity in various chemical and biochemical industries. In this regard, accurately predicting their power consumption is very important, because it influences the mass transfer rate and flow uniformity inside the bioreactor. A literature review revealed that no study has been conducted to investigate the performance of coaxial bioreactors in terms of their power consumption using a machine learning method. In this study, a computational fluid dynamics (CFD) model was developed and validated against experimental data. Subsequently, 500 simulations at different aeration rates (2–6 L/min), anchor impeller speeds (3.5–9.5 rpm), central impeller speeds (60–150 rpm), and rotating modes (co-rotating and counter-rotating) were conducted. The data from these simulations were utilized to train and test various machine learning models. Initially, the k-nearest neighbor (KNN) classification model was employed to categorize the coaxial bioreactors into different rotating modes. It was found that with just the torque value and central impeller speed, the model achieved successful classification. In addition, various regression models, including multi-layer perceptron (MLP), KNN, and random forest, were developed to predict the torque that would be produced by the coaxial bioreactor. For all models, the hyperparameter tuning and cross-validations were performed. The mean squared error (MSE) evaluation showed that the random forest model had superior performance compared to its counterparts.
Supplementary Materials
The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/proceedings2024105049/s1, Conference poster.
Author Contributions
A.R.: Conceptualization, Methodology, Software, Validation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Writing—original draft. F.E.-M.: Conceptualization, Resources, Methodology, Writing—review & editing, Supervision, Project administration, Funding acquisition. A.L.: Conceptualization, Resources, Methodology, Writing—review & editing, Supervision, Project administration, Funding acquisition. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Funding
This research was funded by Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada grant number RGPIN-2019-04644.
Institutional Review Board Statement
Not applicable.
Informed Consent Statement
Not applicable.
Data Availability Statement
Not applicable.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2024 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).