Carbon capture and storage (CCS) is a climate change mitigation technique in which CO2 is captured from a point source, including coal-fired power plants and other industrial activities, rather than released into the atmosphere. The utilization of metal–organic frameworks (MOFs) is one of the most promising approaches for post-combustion carbon capture due to their unique properties including high porosity, surface area, crystallinity, stability, and selectivity, and their wide range of applications, which include gas separation and storage. This paper presents a study on a unique approach to the synthesis of magnesium (Mg)- and zinc (Zn)-MOF-74 materials under varied reaction temperatures and times using the solvothermal technique. This study further explores the physicochemical properties of the materials to evaluate their suitability for selectively capturing CO2 from flue gas produced by typical coal-fired power plants.
The MOF crystals were synthesized at 100, 110, and 125 °C for 6, 12, 24, and 48 h. The physical characteristic were examined using BET analysis, while the surface chemistry, crystallinity, and morphology were investigated using Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR), X-ray diffraction (XRD), and scanning electron microscopy equipped with energy-dispersive X-ray (SEM-EDX), while the thermal stability was evaluated using thermogravimetric analysis (TGA). The FTIR results showed the presence of carboxyl (C=O) and hydroxyl (-OH) functional groups that demonstrate high affinity potential for CO2 adsorption in Zn-MOF-74, whereas only a -OH group was present in Mg-MOF-74. The TGA results showed that the Mg-MOF-74 samples were more stable up to 580 °C whereas the Zn-MOF-74 samples were stable up to 430 °C. The highest surface area and pore volume of Zn-MOF-74 synthesized at 125 °C for 24 h were 826 m2/g and 0.344 cm3/g, whereas those of Mg-MOF-74 synthesized at 110 °C for 8 h were 24.73 m2/g and 101.34 cm3/g. Thus, the physical and chemical properties of the crystalline material prepared at high temperatures were suitable for carbon capture.
Supplementary Materials
The presentation materials can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/proceedings2024105147/s1.
Author Contributions
Conceptualization, G.M.; methodology, G.M.; validation, K.P.; formal anaysis, G.M.; investigation, G.M.; resources, K.P., M.M. and G.M.; data curation, G.M.; writing—original draft preparation, G.M.; writing—review and editing, K.P. and M.M.; visualization, G.M.; supervision, K.P. and M.M.; project administration, G.M. and M.M.; funding acquisition, K.P. and M.M. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Funding
This research was funded by the National Research Foundation (NRF) of South Africa (Grant No: TTK2204224344).
Institutional Review Board Statement
Not applicable.
Informed Consent Statement
Not applicable.
Data Availability Statement
The authors will provide the raw data used to support the results in this article upon request.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2024 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).