Next Article in Journal
Optimal Power Management and Control of Hybrid Solar–Wind Microgrid Including Storage System
Previous Article in Journal
Design of Internet of Things-Enabled Textile-Based Biosensors
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Abstract

Towards On-Site Dairy Cow Mastitis Diagnosis in Your Pocket †

1
ICBAS—School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, University of Porto, Rua de Jorge Viterbo Ferreira 228, 4050-313 Porto, Portugal
2
Segalab—Animal Health and Food Safety Laboratory, R. Cidade da Póvoa de Varzim 55, 4490-295 Argivai, Portugal
3
UCIBIO—Applied Molecular Biosciences Unit, Translational Toxicology Research Laboratory, University Institute of Health Sciences (1H-TOXRUN, IUCS-CESPU), 4585-116 Gandra, Portugal
4
Anicura CHV Porto—Veterinary Hospital Center, R. Manuel Pinto de Azevedo 118, 4100-320 Porto, Portugal
5
INESC TEC—Institute for Systems and Robotics and Computer Engineering, Technology and Science—Campus da FEUP, University of Porto, 4200-465 Porto, Portugal
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Presented at the 4th International Electronic Conference on Biosensors, 20–22 May 2024; Available online: https://sciforum.net/event/IECB2024.
Proceedings 2024, 104(1), 34; https://doi.org/10.3390/proceedings2024104034
Published: 28 May 2024
(This article belongs to the Proceedings of The 4th International Electronic Conference on Biosensors)
Mastitis has a significant impact on animal welfare and dairy industry profitability (regular losses 5–25%, outbreaks 85%), which is the main reason for antibiotic use (risk to the food chain). Diagnosis is based on clinical observations and measures of the inflammatory response by somatic cell counts (SSC) in milk (crucial in quality and salubrity, with limits of 400,000 cells/mL in the EU and 750,000 cells/mL in the US). SSC is a late indicator of mastitis in milk, while early diagnosis is possible by an increased WBC count in the blood, suggesting probable mastitis (prevention). WBC react to inflammation, are released into the bloodstream, and migrate to the mammary gland to fight infection. Furthermore, the SSC value does not discriminate which cells are being counted, as this value can comprise the number different types of white blood cells and mammary gland cells. In this preliminary study, we recorded spectra of fresh milk obtained from 50 cows during milking. The milk collected was sent to a certified laboratory for butyric acid (BA), total protein (TP), urea (U), and SSC. This preliminary test using a spectroscopy point-of-care (POC) system provided the following metrics for on-site quantification: i. BA: R (correlation coefficient) = 0.79 and CE (coefficient of error) = 10.0%; ii. TP: R = 0.94 and CE = 2.8%; and iii. U: R = 0.73 and CE = 12.0%; and iv. SSC: R = 0.72 and CE = 12%. These results demonstrate the possibility of performing a direct measurement of both milk quality and mastitis detection using reagentless POC spectral technology. Further research is necessary to evaluate the efficiency of POC in large-scale studies, as well as its capacity to discriminate between mammary and immune system cells and the presence of bacteria in milk.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, L.P., R.M. and R.C.M.; methodology, A.C., F.S., R.M. and R.C.M.; software, R.C.M.; validation, F.S., P.M. and R.C.M.; formal analysis, A.C., A.P., L.P., R.M. and R.C.M.; investigation, A.C., A.P., L.P., H.G., R.M. and R.C.M.; resources, R.M. and R.C.M.; data curation, A.C.; writing—original draft preparation, A.C. and R.C.M.; writing—review and editing, A.C., A.P., L.P., H.G., F.S., P.M., R.M. and R.C.M.; visualization, A.C., A.P., L.P., H.G., F.S., P.M., R.M. and R.C.M.; supervision, R.M. and R.C.M.; project administration, R.C.M.; funding acquisition, R.M. and R.C.M. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The animal study protocol was approved by the ICBAS-UP (ORBEA-ICBAS)-Protocol nº P490/2023/ORBEA, 23 February 2024.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Data is available on specific requests.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Costa, A.; Pereira, A.; Pinho, L.; Gregório, H.; Santos, F.; Moura, P.; Marcos, R.; Martins, R.C. Towards On-Site Dairy Cow Mastitis Diagnosis in Your Pocket. Proceedings 2024, 104, 34. https://doi.org/10.3390/proceedings2024104034

AMA Style

Costa A, Pereira A, Pinho L, Gregório H, Santos F, Moura P, Marcos R, Martins RC. Towards On-Site Dairy Cow Mastitis Diagnosis in Your Pocket. Proceedings. 2024; 104(1):34. https://doi.org/10.3390/proceedings2024104034

Chicago/Turabian Style

Costa, Alexandra, Adelaide Pereira, Luis Pinho, Hugo Gregório, Filipe Santos, Pedro Moura, Ricardo Marcos, and Rui C. Martins. 2024. "Towards On-Site Dairy Cow Mastitis Diagnosis in Your Pocket" Proceedings 104, no. 1: 34. https://doi.org/10.3390/proceedings2024104034

APA Style

Costa, A., Pereira, A., Pinho, L., Gregório, H., Santos, F., Moura, P., Marcos, R., & Martins, R. C. (2024). Towards On-Site Dairy Cow Mastitis Diagnosis in Your Pocket. Proceedings, 104(1), 34. https://doi.org/10.3390/proceedings2024104034

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop