Next Article in Journal
Pre-Market Analysis and Social Acceptance Feasibility Study for Innovative Wastewater Systems—INNOQUA Project
Previous Article in Journal
Rigidity and Flexibility: A Comparative Study of Traditional Chinese and Western Music from the Perspective of Complex Information System Theory
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Proceeding Paper

Reducing Energy Performance Gap in Buildings—Built2Spec Project Solution †

R2M Solution Srl, 27100 Pavia, Italy
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Presented at Sustainable Places 2017 (SP2017) Conference, Middlesbrough, UK, 28–30 June 2017.
Proceedings 2017, 1(7), 640; https://doi.org/10.3390/proceedings1070640
Published: 25 October 2017
(This article belongs to the Proceedings of the Sustainable Places 2017 (SP2017) Conference)

Abstract

:
Built to Specifications (B2S) is a Horizon 2020 EU-funded project involving 20 European partners that seeks to reduce the gap between a building designed and as-built energy performance. To do this, the project will put a new set of breakthrough technological advances for self-inspection checks and quality assurance measures into the hands of construction professionals. This collection of smart tools will help building stakeholders at all levels in meeting EU energy efficiency targets.

1. Introduction

The energy performance gap can vary widely from the most good practice (which is almost negligible) to worst experiences. According to Carbon Trust [1] energy gap can vary within 16% in best practices to five time in worst one. In this point are described the results of some studies to try to understand better the energy performance gap. The energy performance gap has been mostly studied in the UK (the majority of literature comes from there) with a boost from government [2] (p.3) to achieve closing the gap in 2020. Another interesting information to take into account is the performance of energy efficient buildings in Germany and Switzerland. These studies show another side of the performance gap: the buildings constructed following the Passivhaus standard [3] use to have no difference between the planned energy with the real energy consumption or even consume less energy. This fact is corroborated by other studies in the UK [4,5]. Therefore, it is possible to reduce the performance gap, designing and building in the right way. The literature from Netherlands and Belgium [6] also shows another interesting fact: when worst is the Energy Performance Certificate (EPC) rate of the building planned, bigger is the gap. But at the same time, buildings with worst EPC rating consumes less than expected (it could be said “negative gap”) and buildings with best EPC rating consumes more than expected (“positive gap”). All of these studies show that constructing without gap is possible, but not easy, and needs to be addressed since the project’s beginning. If there isn’t a real will to achieve planned energy performance, the gap can be very big.

2. Stakeholders and Challenges in B2S

Different groups of stakeholders interact within a B2S construction project representing the standard stakeholders acting and working in the construction market. They have different roles, at different moments, and also specific objectives and constraints. The different roles are usually similar from one country to another, even if some terms are sometimes difficult to translate precisely (e.g., maître d’ouvrage who represents in the French context the entity who defines the need, the objectives, the budget, but is not necessarily the future owner himself). A detailed analysis of the stakeholders has been carried out by the B2S project. In Figure 1 an overview of this analysis in represented.
We observe that the interactions between the stakeholders are sometimes complex and difficult to represent—e.g., several documents and technical drawings to be shared among different users; different users working on site with different background; untrained workers, etc. This analysis emphasizes the need for adapted collaborative tools to facilitate and concentrate the communications between all the stakeholders. This need goes well beyond the existence of Building Information Modeling (BIM) tools to represent the building itself and all its components. The collaborative tools could integrate communication flows, control and validation procedure, different types of formats, follow-up and history of the construction project, etc.
The key problems to be addressed by Built2Spec to reduce the energy gap and improve the comfort involve most of the stages of a typical construction process/project. However, the worksite activities stage is probably the one with the larger potential for improvement, as relatively few innovations have been brought to what happens on the construction site (whereas design, commissioning or operation stages have recently benefitted from a large number of technological improvements). The main types of solutions to be tackled by B2S are the following ones:
  • Codified template forms and checklists
    reduce errors and delays
    reduce manual checking
    support verification of sub - contractors
    improve sub-contractor compliance and so improve payments
  • Technology supported quality checking (e.g. integrated measuring tools and data capture)
    reduce time spent and errors made
    capture potential defects sooner
  • Automated data sharing and communications
    with customers
    with supply chain
    with key 3rd parties—e.g., building control
To answer this problem an international collective of stakeholder groups (the Built2Spec community) has been created through workshops, interviews, questionnaires etc. eager to exchange ideas, solution, quantify needs etc. to implement new self-inspection techniques and quality check methodologies on construction project and buildings.

3. Technological Advances and Solutions

Meeting EU energy efficiency targets to reduce the energy gap for both new builds and retrofits will be much easier to manage in the near future thanks to the development of new and innovative on-site quality assurance tools. In order to achieve this ambitious objective, the B2S project will deliver a new set of break-through self-inspection tools to be used on site even by untrained workers such as:
  • 3D and Imagery Tools
  • Building Information Modeling (BIM)
  • Smart Building Components
  • Energy Efficiency Quality Checks
  • Indoor Air Quality (IAQ) Tools
  • Airtightness Test Tools with air-pulse checks
  • Thermal Imaging Tools
  • Acoustic Tools
These technologies are connected to a BIM-enabled and Cloud-based Virtual Construction Management Platform (VCMP) supporting the collection and sharing of all project data, from initial design to the delivery by using a Web Portal along with a proper App available for iOS and Android devices. Moreover the platform will provide installation guidelines, shared design specifications, 3D models and relevant information on regulatory frameworks to make the Users aware and improve the final quality. In addition, workers and their supervisors will have access to workflow, status, training information and product data sheets through their tablets. In Figure 2 an example of the workflow in VCMP to perform Air Pulse test on site is presented.
Specifically, the technological advances being developed in the B2S project and linked to the VCMP are depicted in Figure 3.
During the project, this platform will be integrated into the operations of small and medium - sized enterprise (SME) contractors, large construction firms and end user clients directly within the consortium and work program activities, assuring systematic and scientific performance measures, feedback and powerful exploitation.

4. Conclusion

Meeting EU energy efficiency targets will be one the main challenges of the future for the construction sector. To reach this goal the reduction of the energy gap between the designed and the “as built” is required. To do this several action has to be taken by the Stakeholders involved in the construction process starting from the design team who is required to apply for high performance materials and solution to the constructors who are required to follow high quality standard during the construction process. In Built2Spec a new user—friendly and smart way to reduce the gap is under development. This methodology involves a new set of break—through self—inspection tools to be used on site even by untrained workers such as 3D and Imagery Tools, Building Information Modeling, Smart Building Components, Energy Efficiency Quality Checks, Indoor Air Quality Tools, Airtightness Test Tools with air-pulse checks, Thermal Imaging Tools and Acoustic Tools connected to a BIM—enabled and Cloud-based Virtual Construction Management Platform supporting the collection and sharing of all project data and info from the side back to the office desk for the final process and built quality check to match the design requirements.

Acknowledgments

This project has received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under grant agreement No 637221.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Carbon Trust Organization, Closing the Gap—Lessons Learned on Realising the Potential of Low Carbon Building Design, 2011. Available online: www.carbontrust.co.uk/buildings (accessed on 24 October 2017).
  2. ZERO Carbon Hub (non-profit organization). Available online: www.zerocarbonhub.org (accessed on 24 October 2017).
  3. Passive House Institute (PHI). Available online: http://www.passivehouse.com (accessed on 24 October 2017).
  4. Tofield, B.; French, J. Sustainable Construction and the Green Deal Evidence to the All Party Parliamentary Committee for Excellence in the Built Environment. Sustain. Construct. Green Deal 2012. [Google Scholar]
  5. Johnston, D.; Farmer, D.; Brooke-Peat, M.; Miles-Shenton, D. Bridging the domestic building fabric performance gap. Build. Res. Inf. 2014, 44, 147–159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Majcen, D.; Itard, L.C.M.; Visscher, H. Theoretical vs. actual energy consumption of labelled dwellings in the Netherlands: Discrepancies and policy implications, 2013. Energy Policy 2013, 54, 125–136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Representation of the main stakeholder groups identified by B2S project.
Figure 1. Representation of the main stakeholder groups identified by B2S project.
Proceedings 01 00640 g001
Figure 2. Workflow representation in VCMP to perform Air Pulse test on site.
Figure 2. Workflow representation in VCMP to perform Air Pulse test on site.
Proceedings 01 00640 g002
Figure 3. Representation of the VCMP and technology interaction identified in B2S project.
Figure 3. Representation of the VCMP and technology interaction identified in B2S project.
Proceedings 01 00640 g003

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Bortoluzzi, D.; Costa, A.; Casciati, S. Reducing Energy Performance Gap in Buildings—Built2Spec Project Solution. Proceedings 2017, 1, 640. https://doi.org/10.3390/proceedings1070640

AMA Style

Bortoluzzi D, Costa A, Casciati S. Reducing Energy Performance Gap in Buildings—Built2Spec Project Solution. Proceedings. 2017; 1(7):640. https://doi.org/10.3390/proceedings1070640

Chicago/Turabian Style

Bortoluzzi, Daniele, Andrea Costa, and Sara Casciati. 2017. "Reducing Energy Performance Gap in Buildings—Built2Spec Project Solution" Proceedings 1, no. 7: 640. https://doi.org/10.3390/proceedings1070640

APA Style

Bortoluzzi, D., Costa, A., & Casciati, S. (2017). Reducing Energy Performance Gap in Buildings—Built2Spec Project Solution. Proceedings, 1(7), 640. https://doi.org/10.3390/proceedings1070640

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop