Next Article in Journal
Insights into Australian Bat Lyssavirus in Insectivorous Bats of Western Australia
Previous Article in Journal
The Global Burden of Disease of Zoonotic Parasitic Diseases: Top 5 Contenders for Priority Consideration
Open AccessArticle

Investigation of Mixture Modelling Algorithms as a Tool for Determining the Statistical Likelihood of Serological Exposure to Filariasis Utilizing Historical Data from the Lymphatic Filariasis Surveillance Program in Vanuatu

1
The Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research, Division of Population Health and Immunity, Melbourne, VIC 3052, Australia
2
Department of Medical Biology, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC 3052, Australia
3
Neglected Tropical Diseases Support Center, The Task Force for Global Health, Decatur, GA 30030, USA
4
College of Public Health, Medical and Veterinary Sciences, James Cook University, Cairns, QLD 4878, Australia
5
Great Barrier Reef Legacy, Cairns, QLD 4877, Australia
6
Vector Borne Disease Unit, Ministry of Health, Port Vila, Vanuatu
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Trop. Med. Infect. Dis. 2019, 4(1), 45; https://doi.org/10.3390/tropicalmed4010045
Received: 10 January 2019 / Revised: 1 March 2019 / Accepted: 3 March 2019 / Published: 8 March 2019
As the prevalence of lymphatic filariasis declines, it becomes crucial to adequately eliminate residual areas of endemicity and implement surveillance. To this end, serological assays have been developed, including the Bm14 Filariasis CELISA which recommends a specific optical density cut-off level. We used mixture modelling to assess positive cut-offs of Bm14 serology in children in Vanuatu using historical OD (Optical Density) ELISA values collected from a transmission assessment survey (2005) and a targeted child survey (2008). Mixture modelling is a statistical technique using probability distributions to identify subpopulations of positive and negative results (absolute cut-off value) and an 80% indeterminate range around the absolute cut-off (80% cut-off). Depending on programmatic choices, utilizing the lower 80% cut-off ensures the inclusion of all likely positives, however with the trade-off of lower specificity. For 2005, country-wide antibody prevalence estimates varied from 6.4% (previous cut-off) through 9.0% (absolute cut-off) to 17.3% (lower 80% cut-off). This corroborated historical evidence of hotspots in Pentecost Island in Penama province. For 2008, there were no differences in the prevalence rates using any of the thresholds. In conclusion, mixture modelling is a powerful tool that allows closer monitoring of residual transmission spots and these findings supported additional monitoring which was conducted in Penama in later years. Utilizing a statistical data-based cut-off, as opposed to a universal cut-off, may help guide program decisions that are better suited to the national program. View Full-Text
Keywords: mixture modelling; filariasis; CELISA; R statistics; elimination; surveillance; serology; Bm14 mixture modelling; filariasis; CELISA; R statistics; elimination; surveillance; serology; Bm14
Show Figures

Figure 1

MDPI and ACS Style

Joseph, H.; Sullivan, S.; Wood, P.; Melrose, W.; Taleo, F.; Graves, P. Investigation of Mixture Modelling Algorithms as a Tool for Determining the Statistical Likelihood of Serological Exposure to Filariasis Utilizing Historical Data from the Lymphatic Filariasis Surveillance Program in Vanuatu. Trop. Med. Infect. Dis. 2019, 4, 45.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Back to TopTop