3.1. Racial Classification of Baptized Afro-Descendants and Their Parents
A total of 274 Afro-descendants were baptized in St. Augustine, Florida, during the ten selected years of the second half of the eighteenth century. In 179 of these cases, their racial classification is identified (
Table 5). Of these, 83% were recorded as ‘Black’. Only one in six (16.2%) was classified as ‘Mulatto’ or ‘Pardo,’ indicating very limited dynamics of racial mixing.
In contrast, New Orleans presents a greater diversity in the racial classification of baptized Afro-descendants in 1796. Just over half (53%) were identified as ‘Black’ (
Table 6). The remaining individuals reflect more diverse patterns of racial mixing: nearly 29% were classified as ‘Mulatto,’ 11% as ‘Quadroon’ (three-quarters European ancestry and one-quarter African), and 6% were recorded as having Indigenous ancestry—‘Griffes’ or ‘Mestizos.’
In St. Augustine, 31% of baptized children had a ‘father unknown.’ Seven out of ten known fathers were identified as ‘Black’ (
Table 7). In a quarter of the cases, no racial classification was provided, and only 4% were classified as ‘Mulatto’ or ‘Pardo.’ The proportion of unknown fathers was higher among children classified as mulattoes. Only 9 of the 29 children labeled as mulatto or pardo (30%) had their father’s name recorded (
Table 8). Among them, one-third were Afro-descendants, while the rest had no racial classification noted and are presumed to be of European origin. Examples include Pablo Villa from Gascony (France), father of two mulatto children with his enslaved Black Juana Blas
1, baptized in 1789 and 1791, and Don Juan Sivelli, a distinguished sergeant of the Royal Artillery Corps, who had a mulatto daughter, María Isabel, with Tecla, a mulatta enslaved by Don Juan Leslie, a merchant in St. Augustine in 1788
2.
Almost 92% of mothers in St. Augustine with an identified racial classification were labeled as ‘Black’ (
Table 9), a higher percentage than for fathers (69%). There is no case among the 274 registered where the father was Afro-descendant and the mother was not racially identified. In other words, in Afro-descendant cases, racial mixing always appears asymmetrical: whenever one parent was of European origin, it was always the father.
Examining the racial relationship between father and mother, there is no instance of fathers identified as ‘Black’ or ‘Brown’ having children with mothers identified as ‘Mulatta,’ ‘Parda,’ or ‘Indigenous’ (
Table 10). The reverse, however, is observed. Half of the fathers classified as ‘Mulatto’ or ‘Pardo’ had offspring with mothers identified as ‘Black’, and the other half with ‘Mulatta,’ ‘Parda,’ or ‘Indigenous’ women. We can see this in two examples: the baptism of Victoria Josefa in 1755, whose father was Francisco Javier, a brown-skinned native of Havana and a slave of Governor Don Fulgencio García
3, and whose mother was Paula Gloriana, a brown-skinned native of Havana and also a slave of the governor. This was also the case with the baptism in 1750 of José Javier, son of the Creole mulatto Marcos Ortega and of María, a Black native of the Congo and a slave of Licentiate Don B. de Ortega
4.
In the case of New Orleans, 75% of mothers identified at baptisms are referred to as “Black,” (
Table 11) a significantly higher percentage than those baptized (53%) and known fathers (65%), reflecting these more diverse dynamics of racial mixing. One in six mothers is mulatto (a percentage three times that of St. Augustine, Florida), and 5% are cuarteronas (a designation not found in St. Augustine, Florida). The remaining 2% are of Native American descent, a combination of European and Native American (mestizo) and African and Native American (griffe). Among known fathers, one in six baptized is “quadroon”, and 10% are mulatto. For 8% of known fathers, no racial distinction is indicated, although it is inferred that they are of European origin.
The percentage of unknown fathers is much higher in New Orleans than in St. Augustine, Florida. Only 14% of the African American children baptized in 1796 had their fathers identified. A higher proportion of “unknown” fathers is found among children of mixed race whose mother is Black. While 16% of those baptized as “Black” have a known father, only one of the 54 “mulatto” and “mulatto” children baptized whose mother is Black is known. This is the case with the baptism of Pedro in May 1796. He was a free mulatto native of the Mississippi River coast, son of Francisca, a free Black woman, and Don Francisco Labarrestere
5.
The combination of the racial distinction of the child and that of the mother, when indicated in both cases, shows significant differences (
Table 12). Two out of every three baptized children named “mulatto” or “mulata” and “grifo” or “grifa” were born to “black” mothers. This percentage drops to 7% in the case of children named “quadroon” or “quadroon”. This is the case of the baptism of Celeste Catalina in April 1796, a free quadroon, of an unknown father, whose mother was Julia, a Black slave of Madame Lasmare, who granted her freedom at birth
6. These differences persist when comparing the racial distinction of the father and mother (
Table 13). While 96% of mothers are called “black” when the father is also Black, this percentage drops to 50% for fathers named “mulatto,” and in no case when the father is named “quadroon” Racial distinction acts as a clear differentiating element in the relationship between father and mother.
3.2. Legal Status of the Baptized and Birth Legitimacy
Eighty-three percent of the baptized individuals in St. Augustine, Florida, were enslaved, whereas in New Orleans, this figure drops by ten percentage points (73%). This difference can be attributed to a more established free Black community in New Orleans, as studied by
Kimberly Hanger (
2002),
Din and Harkins (
1996),
Din (
2014), and
Piché (
2018) for the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries. In both cases, the legal status of the parents shows notable differences. In St. Augustine, 27% of the fathers whose legal status is known were free—a proportion that doubles that of the mothers (12%).
All children whose fathers were enslaved also had enslaved mothers (
Table 14). However, the reverse was not always true: only one in three children of free fathers also had a free mother. Thus, gender acts as a differentiating factor in legal status. In other words, there were cases of free Afro-descendant fathers having children with enslaved women, but not vice versa, according to the data from St. Augustine.
Regarding the legal status of the baptized individuals themselves, all those classified as enslaved had enslaved mothers (
Table 15). However, the same correspondence did not hold for free children: in six cases, baptized children were recorded as free despite having enslaved mothers. Three of them were children of free fathers of unspecified race. Two were the children of Pablo Villa, a man from Gascony (France): Pablo Cirilio, a “pardo” born in 1789, and Antonia María del Carmen, born in 1791
7. Their mother, Juana Blas, was enslaved by Pablo Villa, who recognized them as his natural children and granted them freedom. Another case was María Pilar Sánchez, daughter of Don José Sánchez, a native of St. Augustine, and Flora, a Black woman enslaved by his brother Don Francisco Sánchez, who granted the child freedom at birth
8.
Two other cases involved children of escaped slaves from South Carolina: María Ana (age four) and Ana (two months old), baptized in 1790. Their parents, Tomás and Sabina, were enslaved by Tomás Barnaby but were recorded as free at baptism. The sixth case was María Rosa, daughter of the free mulatto Juan Bautista and María Isabel, an enslaved Black woman in 1790. Her mother’s owner, Doña Margarita Toneli, granted her freedom at birth
9. Her parents, Tomás and Sabina, were slaves belonging to Tomás Barnaby. Both were baptized as free men. The last of the six baptized was “María Rosa,” the daughter of a free mulatto, Juan Bautista, and María Isabel, a Black slave in 1790. Her mother’s owner, Doña Margarita Toneli, granted her freedom at birth
10.
In New Orleans, the proportion of free Afro-descendants is higher. Four out of ten known fathers were free, while this figure dropped to one in four among mothers (
Table 16). There is a notable correlation between the legal status of both parents: in 81% of cases where the father was free, so was the mother. Some exceptions exist, such as the baptism of Eulalia in May 1796, a Black enslaved child whose father, Enrique, was a free Black man and whose mother, also named Eulalia, was an enslaved woman owned by Juan Bautista McCarty
11. It is rarer to find the inverse case, such as the baptism of Felipe in April 1796, a free Griffe, son of Manuel, a Black enslaved man, and Tonton, a free mulatta
12.
When the baptized child was enslaved, the mother was also enslaved in all cases (
Table 17). As in St. Augustine, the reverse was not always true: in 10 out of 75 cases of free baptized children, the mother was enslaved. None of these 10 had a known father. In each of these instances, the child was granted freedom by the mother’s owner. For example, Euphrosima, identified as a quadroon, baptized in November 1796, was the daughter of Magdalena, an enslaved mulatta owned by Monsieur de Longuet
13. The owner granted Euphrosima her freedom at baptism.
The relationship between racial classification and legal status among baptized children and their parents is significant (
Table 18). While 84% of children labeled as quadroons had free mothers, this percentage falls to 36% among mulatto children, 13% among griffes, and just 3% for those classified as Black. In other words, there is a strong correlation between the proportion of African ancestry and the mother’s legal status. A similar pattern emerges when considering both parents’ statuses. In 96% of cases where the father was enslaved, the mother was classified as Black (
Table 19). This percentage drops to 28% when the father was free. Thus, gender, legal status, and racial classification intersect in meaningful ways.
More than half of the baptisms registered in St. Augustine lacked information about the legitimacy of the births. Therefore, the analysis of legitimacy is based on the more complete data available for New Orleans, providing a broader base for intersectional analysis.
Of the 262 baptized infants in New Orleans whose legitimacy status is known, 93% were labeled as natural children (i.e., illegitimate), leaving only 18 cases (6.87%) classified as legitimate (
Table 20). This figure aligns with the highest rates of illegitimacy found in regions like Extremadura in the Iberian Peninsula (
Periáñez Gómez 2010a).
There are significant relationships between legitimacy, racial classification, legal status, and gender. While only 5% of legitimate children had mothers classified as Black, the figure rises to 53% for those whose mothers were classified as quadroons (
Table 21). For example, Manuel Mayeux, a free quadroon baptized as legitimate in September 1796, was the son of Bernardo Mayeux, also a free quadroon, and María Francisca, a free quadroon woman
14.
This relationship also extends to legal status. While only 5% of children born to enslaved mothers were legitimate, the percentage rose to 14% among children of free mothers (
Table 22). One example is María Ovó, a free mulatta baptized in August 1796 as legitimate. Her parents were Pablo Ovó and Francisca Bienville, both free mulattoes
15.
Gender also functioned as a differentiating factor: two-thirds of legitimately baptized individuals were male. Additionally, only 16% of legitimately baptized males were enslaved, while the reverse was true for females—five out of six legitimately baptized girls were enslaved. For instance, María Francisca, a Black enslaved girl baptized in October 1796, was the daughter of Pedro and María Rosa, both enslaved by Madame Villie
16.