Next Article in Journal
Visualization of Metastatic Lung Cancer with TiNIR
Previous Article in Journal
Sinogram Inpainting with Generative Adversarial Networks and Shape Priors
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Tips and Tricks in Thoracic Radiology for Beginners: A Findings-Based Approach

by
Alessandra Borgheresi
1,2,
Andrea Agostini
1,2,3,*,
Luca Pierpaoli
4,
Alessandra Bruno
4,
Tommaso Valeri
4,
Ginevra Danti
5,
Eleonora Bicci
5,
Michela Gabelloni
6,
Federica De Muzio
7,
Maria Chiara Brunese
7,
Federico Bruno
3,8,
Pierpaolo Palumbo
3,8,
Roberta Fusco
9,
Vincenza Granata
10,
Nicoletta Gandolfo
11,
Vittorio Miele
3,5,
Antonio Barile
12 and
Andrea Giovagnoni
1,2
1
Department of Clinical, Special and Dental Sciences, University Politecnica delle Marche, Via Tronto 10/a, 60126 Ancona, Italy
2
Department of Radiology, University Hospital “Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria delle Marche”, Via Conca 71, 60126 Ancona, Italy
3
Italian Society of Medical and Interventional Radiology (SIRM), SIRM Foundation, 20122 Milan, Italy
4
School of Radiology, University Politecnica delle Marche, Via Tronto 10/a, 60126 Ancona, Italy
5
Department of Radiology, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi, 50134 Florence, Italy
6
Nuclear Medicine Unit, Department of Translational Research, University of Pisa, 56126 Pisa, Italy
7
Department of Medicine and Health Sciences V. Tiberio, University of Molise, 86100 Campobasso, Italy
8
Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Area of Cardiovascular and Interventional Imaging, Abruzzo Health, Unit 1, 67100 L’Aquila, Italy
9
Medical Oncology Division, Igea SpA, 80013 Naples, Italy
10
Division of Radiology, Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS Fondazione Pascale—IRCCS di Napoli, 80131 Naples, Italy
11
Diagnostic Imaging Department, Villa Scassi Hospital-ASL 3, 16149 Genoa, Italy
12
Department of Biotechnological and Applied Clinical Sciences, University of L’Aquila, 67100 L’Aquila, Italy
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Tomography 2023, 9(3), 1153-1186; https://doi.org/10.3390/tomography9030095
Submission received: 5 May 2023 / Revised: 3 June 2023 / Accepted: 12 June 2023 / Published: 14 June 2023

Abstract

:
This review has the purpose of illustrating schematically and comprehensively the key concepts for the beginner who approaches chest radiology for the first time. The approach to thoracic imaging may be challenging for the beginner due to the wide spectrum of diseases, their overlap, and the complexity of radiological findings. The first step consists of the proper assessment of the basic imaging findings. This review is divided into three main districts (mediastinum, pleura, focal and diffuse diseases of the lung parenchyma): the main findings will be discussed in a clinical scenario. Radiological tips and tricks, and relative clinical background, will be provided to orient the beginner toward the differential diagnoses of the main thoracic diseases.

1. Introduction

Thoracic imaging is fundamental for the assessment of lung parenchyma, the pleural district, and the mediastinal structures [1]. In most cases, chest X-ray (CXR) and computed tomography (CT) provide diagnostic information with a high degree of confidence [2]. The association of typical radiological findings with clinical or laboratory data leads to the right diagnosis. On the other hand, some diagnoses are challenging and can be achieved only with surgical or biopsy specimens. These cases require a multidisciplinary approach for correct management, including experienced pneumologists, chest radiologists, pathologists, and thoracic surgeons [3,4].
The purpose of this review is to provide the basics for the diagnostic approach to pulmonary, pleural, and mediastinal diseases, together with “tips and tricks” that can be helpful for the beginner. The paper will be divided into three main sections (i.e., differential diagnosis of mediastinal masses, differential diagnosis of pleural lesions, and differential diagnosis of parenchymal diseases) based on the main anatomical structures of the chest to provide a diagnostic approach as plain as possible for residents and beginners. Furthermore, the section on the mediastinum is divided into the main anatomical compartments since it is relevant for the differential diagnosis of mediastinal lesions. The diagnostic approach of pleural diseases considers neoplastic and non-neoplastic or tumorlike lesions. The differential diagnosis of pulmonary diseases is divided into focal or diffuse lesions. The focal pulmonary lesions are divided following the basic findings on CXR or CT (e.g., shape, margins, density…), while the diffuse lung diseases are divided following the main patterns on CT.

2. Differential Diagnosis of Mediastinal Masses

The differential diagnosis of mediastinal masses covers a broad variety of pathologic entities; a widely used method to start the diagnostic process is the localization of the pathological process within a mediastinal compartment [4,5,6]. The International Thymic Malignancy Interest Group (ITMIG) developed a structured approach to the differential diagnosis of mediastinal masses based on a cross-sectional imaging classification that identifies three mediastinal compartments: prevascular (anterior), visceral (middle), and paravertebral (posterior) [7,8]. This classification is also widely used in conventional radiology; the combination of the silhouette sign and the knowledge of mediastinal reflections in CXR can help to correctly identify the location of a mass [9]. Table 1 summarizes the main anatomical landmarks and contents of the mediastinal compartments and the main findings for the correct location of a mediastinal mass at CXR [10,11,12,13,14].
Once the mass is identified on the CXR, then CT and MRI provide more detailed information about the anatomical relationship of the tumor, with additional but fundamental data if contrast material is administered. Moreover, CT and MRI allow for the evaluation of lesion composition (cystic nature, presence of calcifications, or fat content) [15,16,17,18]. Table 2 summarizes the main mediastinal lesions sorted by location and composition with the relative frequencies [19].
Mediastinal masses are quite rare; however, slightly more than half of them are in the anterior mediastinum, and the others are almost equally divided between the middle and posterior compartments [7].
In the following sections, we will describe the mediastinal lesions that present characteristic features at radiology. In most cases, the integration between the imaging findings and clinical information lead to a confident diagnosis; however, the multidisciplinary approach is necessary for more complex cases [4].

2.1. Prevascular Compartment

2.1.1. Fat-Containing Lesions

The presence of macroscopic intralesional fat can be confidently assessed on CT when Hounsfield Unit (HU) values between −40 and −120 are measured, or on MRI by any sequence including fat suppression or chemical shift imaging [5,20]. One of the most overlooked benign lesions on chest CXR is the epicardial fat pad, which appears as a para-cardiac mass in contact with the diaphragm. On CT, it can be easily assessed since it appears as very homogeneous fat tissue, usually at the cardiophrenic angle, without any encapsulation, typically more prominent in obese patients [21]. Mature teratoma commonly affects young patients; it represents 25% of the lesions of the anterior compartment in ages 10–19, 10–15% in ages 20–49, and <5% for age > 50 in both men and women [17]. It is a highly characteristic lesion on imaging, showing a heterogeneous content for the presence of intralesional fat (50% of cases), and varying amounts of fluids, soft tissues, and calcifications (including bone and toothlike elements) [20]. The presence of a fat–fluid level is highly specific for this benign lesion; however, it is a rare finding [17,22]. Another fat-containing lesion is the thymolipoma; it accounts for less than <5% of prevascular masses in all age groups without sex predilection [6,17]. This benign tumor classically appears as a large (mean 20 cm in size), encapsulated mass located in a cardiophrenic angle, and it is mostly composed of macroscopic fat (up to 95%) with scattered regions of solid tissue and fibrous septa [20,23,24]. Some useful tips for the confirmation of the diagnosis are the demonstration of a direct connection with the thymus (best visualized on MRI) and the characteristics morphological changes at different decubitus positions of the patient [16,18,25]. Mass effect symptoms may be present; rare cases of associations between thymolipomas and myasthenia gravis, Grave’s disease, and hematological disorders have been reported [26]. Lipoma represents 2% of all the anterior mediastinal masses and it is a well-defined, encapsulated mass, predominantly composed of homogeneous fat and with a small amount of soft tissue and blood vessels [17]. However, the presence of macroscopic fat should not be univocally associated to benignity; the presence of aggressive features, including a greater proportion of soft-tissue components, local invasion, and lymphadenopathy, should always be investigated to exclude a liposarcoma, which is a very rare lesion but is composed predominantly of fat [20,27,28]. A rare fat-containing lesion is the Morgagni hernia; it contains omental fat that has herniated through the diaphragm into the thorax via the foramen of Morgagni and usually contains bowels and gas [6,20]. Morgagni hernias typically occur in adults and may be associated with obesity, trauma, or other causes of increased intra-abdominal pressure [23,29].

2.1.2. Cystic Lesions

Typically, a cystic lesion is a rounded/oval homogeneous mass with a thin wall and HU values ranging between 0 and 20 HU without sign of enhancement or infiltration of the adjacent structures [20]. The confirmation of the purely cystic nature should be placed by MRI where the cyst typically shows high signal intensity on T2-weighted images [30,31]. Cystic lesions placed near the thymic bed that do not demonstrate soft-tissue components or internal septa are highly characteristic of a thymic cyst; similarly, if the cyst is placed in one of the cardiophrenic angles (mostly the right one) it can be confidently diagnosed as a pericardial cyst [32,33]. Thymic cysts are mostly due to an inflammation or iatrogenic processes (surgery, radiation therapy, or chemotherapy) and may demonstrate the presence of hemorrhagic or proteinaceous components that are better demonstrated on MRI [30,31]. MRI also allows for the identification of the internal soft-tissue components and/or internal septa [6,34]. In these cases, the differential diagnosis includes multilocular thymic cysts, cystic thymoma, lymphangioma, or cystic teratoma. The presence of cystic thymoma should be strongly considered if the patient also demonstrates symptoms related to myasthenia gravis or other paraneoplastic syndromes, especially if >40 years of age. Each of the above-described cystic lesions represents <5% of the anterior mediastinal lesions [17]. Lymphangioma is a very rare benign congenital malformation consisting of a large multilocular cystic lesion (spongelike) that may extend into the neck, axilla, or chest wall, and it is usually discovered during the first two years of life [33,35,36]. Cystic teratoma is a variant of the mature teratoma where the fatty component is predominantly or entirely replaced by a unilocular or multilocular thin-walled cystic mass. Furthermore, some solid tumors (lymphomas) or abscesses can demonstrate cystic degenerative changes (Figure 1); however, in such cases, laboratory tests, patient history (previous median sternotomy, esophageal perforation, or recent head/neck infections), and ancillary features (air bubbles) are helpful clues for the diagnosis [33].

2.1.3. Soft-Tissue Enhancing Masses

Mediastinal goiter is one of the most common lesions of the prevascular compartment (20–40%, age > 40) and has highly characteristic features on imaging. It is heterogeneous and characteristically hyperdense (with HU of 70–85 due to the presence of iodine), it demonstrates intense and prolonged enhancement (>2 min) after administration of IV contrast, and it is often connected to the thyroid gland [37]. It usually demonstrates cystic changes; calcifications may be present. Sometimes, a definitive connection with the thyroid gland cannot be identified; nevertheless, when they are separate, they often demonstrate similar imaging features, and the diagnosis can be confidently achieved [38]. It is fundamental to always consider the signs of malignancy, loss of distinct mediastinal fascial planes, or local lymphadenopathy, which can provide the suspect of thyroid carcinoma [1,16].
Thymoma should be considered in cases of homogeneous or slightly heterogeneous anterior mediastinal mass in patients >40 years of age since it represents about 50% of the anterior compartment lesions in this age range. If it occurs in association with symptoms of myasthenia gravis or other paraneoplastic syndromes, the diagnosis can be determined confidently [17,39,40]. Typically, lymphadenopathy is not present, but thymomas may present signs of local invasiveness for pleural and/or pericardial spread in advanced stages [22]. Conversely, other thymic epithelial neoplasms should be suspected (thymic carcinoma or carcinoid) in this age range in case of a large heterogeneous mass with calcification, necrotic or cystic component, irregular contour, and enhancement paired with signs of aggressive behavior (lymphadenopathy, pleural effusion, and sign of local invasiveness). Carcinoid tumors typically show a vivid arterial enhancement and may be associated with endocrine neoplasia (MEN) type 1 [10]. The suspect can be further confirmed on 18 F-FDG PET/CT, as they typically demonstrate higher FDG uptake [41,42,43,44]; however, thymic epithelial neoplasms are rare conditions since they represent about 5% in >40 years of age (Figure 2) [17].
In the setting of a soft-tissue mildly enhancing mass in the mediastinum, if lymphadenopathy is present, lymphoma should be considered. Additionally, far from thymic epithelial neoplasms and germ cell tumors, lymphomas show an infiltrative nature that encircles but “respects” the great vessels without invasion. Lymphomas represent the most common mediastinal lesion in <40 years of age, thus, when associated with “B” symptoms (i.e., fever, weight loss, and night sweats), it is possible to place quite confidently the diagnosis. If these findings are combined with pleural effusion and elevated serum levels of lactate dehydrogenase, then lymphoblastic non-Hodgkin lymphoma should be considered.
Another lesion to be considered in the differential diagnosis for a large, lobular homogeneous anterior mediastinal mass in a young man 10–39 years of age is seminoma [45]. This may be difficult to be differentiated from lymphoma on imaging; however, it is usually lobulated or irregular in shape and the presence of distant metastases (usually in lungs) and slightly elevated serum β-HCG (10% of cases) could be the tiebreaker for seminoma diagnosis [46]. The serum lactate dehydrogenase levels are usually elevated, as in many lymphomas [47,48]. In the case of a heterogeneous anterior mediastinal mass in a patient <40 years old with lung metastases, nonseminomatous germ cell tumors (NSGCTs) should be included in the differential diagnosis [17,49]. Markedly elevated serum α-FP or β-HCG levels are present in 90% of patients and are pathognomonic for this diagnosis [17,34,47,49,50,51,52].
Thymic hyperplasia is an uncommon condition that usually manifests as a uniform enlargement of the thymus in young patients or at age > 40 without evidence of a focal mass. In true hyperplasia (or “rebound hyperplasia”), the patient usually reports exposure to stressors (i.e., chemotherapy, radiation therapy, corticosteroids, burns, injuries), and the thymus can demonstrate an increase in size > 50% over the baseline [53]. In thymic lymphoid (follicular) hyperplasia, the patient demonstrates underlying immunological diseases (e.g., myasthenia gravis, hyperthyroidism, collagen vascular diseases, or human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection) [17]. Unfortunately, in some cases, a nodular or bulky aspect can be present, and the differential diagnosis with a thymic epithelial tumor, lymphoma, or other soft-tissue neoplasms can be difficult. In these cases, a 3-month follow-up CT should be considered. Another strategy includes an MRI evaluation with in-phase and out-phase gradient echo sequence to assess the type 2 chemical shift artifact [15,54,55]. The fat interspersed within the hyperplastic thymic parenchyma typically demonstrates a signal loss in out-phase images; conversely, thymic epithelial neoplasms, lymphoma, and other soft-tissue malignancies do not demonstrate this artifact [15,54,55].
Parathyroid adenomas (ectopic) are usually small in size and have a nonspecific appearance, but they should be suspected if the patient is affected by hyperparathyroidism (elevated serum levels of calcium and parathyroid hormone) [6]. They manifest as a hypervascular, mediastinal lesion with washout of contrast material in the delayed phase; if doubt persists, they can be confidently characterized with Technetium-99 sestamibi single-photon emission CT scans [6,50].

2.2. Middle Compartment

2.2.1. Cystic Lesions

A simple cystic lesion (as described above) of this compartment is compatible with a benign duplication cyst, usually bronchogenic or esophageal. Bronchogenic cysts are commonly located in the subcarinal area (52%) or, less commonly, in the right paratracheal region (19%); they may involve any mediastinal compartment but typically are in the middle one [33]. Intrinsic calcifications and hemorrhagic or proteinaceous components may occur [33]. The presence of intralesional air is uncommon; it suggests secondary infection and/or communication with the tracheobronchial tree [16,56]. Esophageal duplication cysts show similar imaging features; however, they could show thicker walls and are located adjacent to the esophagus or in association with the esophageal wall itself [33]. In this case, the presence of a heterogenous content can be due to ectopic gastric mucosa (50% of cases) which is specifically detected on 99mTc sodium pertechnetate scans [57].

2.2.2. Soft-Tissue Enhancing Masses

The first aspect to be evaluated is the clinical history of the patient looking for the possibility of metastatic lymphadenopathy from various primary malignancies (e.g., renal cell and thyroid neoplasms, melanoma, choriocarcinoma, and sarcoma). Furthermore, if the lesion is strictly related to the esophagus, consider esophageal cancer, particularly if the wall thickening is focal instead of homogeneous; the diagnosis should be confirmed by endoscopy. The presence of a homogenous, high-enhancing mass is compatible with paragangliomas or extra-adrenal pheochromocytomas. These lesions can be “functional” and secrete catecholamines; however, most of them are “non-functional” [58,59]. MRI can confirm the suspect if a mass with intermediate signal intensity on T1-weighted images and high signal intensity on T2-weighted images is demonstrated; iodine 123 (123I) metaiodobenzylguanidine (MIBG) scintigraphy can help to support the diagnosis [58,59]. A cardiac mass is a rare condition, primary tumors are even more rare, and metastatic diseases should be always excluded first. There are many kinds of cardiac neoplasms; it is important to note that due to their complexity, these lesions should always be properly assessed with advanced imaging (electrocardiographically (ECG) gated cardiac CT, cardiac MR imaging, and/or echocardiography) for adequate characterization [60].

2.3. Posterior Compartment

2.3.1. Cystic Lesions

Intrathoracic meningocele should be suspected if a cystic lesion in the paravertebral mediastinum is associated with neurofibromatosis or vertebral primary (e.g., hemivertebrae, butterfly vertebra, spina bifida) or acquired (e.g., trauma) abnormalities [6,33,61]. Another cystic lesion with paravertebral location and association with vertebral anomalies is the neurenteric cyst. The neurenteric cyst is a very rare condition, and the differential diagnosis with the meningocele can be performed by the intraspinal injection of contrast material that will reveal the filling of the meningocele [6,23,61]. Pancreatic pseudocysts or mediastinal abscesses are cystic masses that usually demonstrate an enhancing wall and heterogenous content because of blood and necrotic material; in such cases, the clinical context permits a definitive diagnosis [62,63]. The extension of a pancreatic pseudocyst into the mediastinum is uncommon; however, the clinical setting of pancreatitis or the presence of similar lesions in the abdomen can support the diagnosis of intrathoracic extension of a pancreatic pseudocyst [63,64]. Conversely, a mediastinal abscess should be suspected after surgery or esophageal perforation or in the setting of infection in the adjacent thorax in a patient with clinical symptoms (e.g., fever) [62].
The posterior mediastinal compartment also includes the thoracic spine, with all the related pathology, such as spinal infections (significant risk factors include diabetes, autoimmune diseases, malignancy, immunosuppression, and intravenous drug use) and primary osseous tumors.

2.3.2. Soft-Tissue Enhancing Masses

Most of the lesions of this compartment are neoplasms of neurogenic origin, and 70–80% of them are benign and represent 20% of all the mediastinal neoplasms in adults [65]. Neurogenic neoplasms are characteristically smooth, round, or oval masses located in the paravertebral region and mostly consist of benign peripheral nerve sheath tumors (e.g., schwannoma or neurofibroma) which usually show the classical dumbbell morphology and communication with the spinal canal [65]. Benign, pressure erosion of adjacent ribs or vertebrae, and enlargement of the neural foramina can be present, and this should not be confused with a malignant behavior. A better definition can be obtained with MRI, which demonstrates the extent of intraspinal/extradural extension and the “fascicular sign”, typical for schwannomas, and the “target sign”, more characteristic of neurofibromas [66,67]. However, it must be pointed out that neurofibromas can have malignant transformation; this risk is higher in patients affected by type 1 neurofibromatosis. Malignant transformation of a peripheral nerve sheath tumor should be suspected in case of size increase, heterogeneity, invasiveness, and high FDG uptake at PET/CT [68,69].
Extramedullary hematopoiesis should be considered in the setting of a hematologic disorder resulting in bone marrow replacement (myelofibrosis or chronic myelogenous leukemia) or hemolytic anemia (thalassemia, sickle cell anemia, or hereditary spherocytosis) [23,70]. The masses are typically adjacent to thoracic vertebrae and ribs and show vivid enhancement; in the case of proven long-standing lesions, they demonstrate heterogeneous attenuation because of the iron deposition and fat infiltration [20,71]. However, if such underlying disorders are unknown, 99mTc sulfur colloid bone marrow scan and SPECT/CT bone marrow scan may noninvasively confirm the presence of functioning hematopoietic tissue, avoiding unnecessary biopsy [72,73,74].

2.4. More than One Mediastinal Compartment

Lymphadenopathy is the most common cause of anterior and middle mediastinal masses: it is usually secondary to many pathological processes such as lymphoproliferative disorders (Hodgkin and Non-Hodgkin lymphoma), sarcoidosis, inflammatory or infective conditions, and metastases. It is possible to differentiate between neoplastic and granulomatous processes by morphology. A detailed review of all the conditions and imaging features related to lymphadenopathy is beyond the scope of this paper; however, some basic tips will be discussed in the following section [16,75].
Once the lymph node is localized (the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer (IASLC) map is recommended), the term lymphadenopathy is usually restricted to enlargement, due to any cause, of the lymph nodes [76,77,78]. However, since the dimensional criteria themselves lack specificity for the distinction between normal or pathological conditions, other morphological features must be evaluated [79].
For the dimensional assessment of lymph nodes, the measurement of the short axis is recommended [80]. In general, mediastinal lymph nodes with short axes up to 12 mm and hilar lymph nodes with short axes up to 3 mm are considered benign [79,81,82]. Moreover, it must be pointed out that nodal enlargement does not always represent a pathological condition. The sarcoid-like reactions are temporary, immune-related adverse events to different drugs (e.g., immunotherapy, interferon-α, highly active antiretrovirals) where patients develop mediastinal lymph node enlargement. This condition must be considered in oncological patients in immunotherapy since it can simulate a disease progression. In doubtful cases, a 4-week follow-up CT is warranted [78,83,84].
The other CT features to be evaluated include the increase in number or changes in attenuation (calcific, fatty, hypodense, enhancing). The integration of these findings with the clinical data is helpful to orient the differential diagnosis [77,78].
While the presence of fat or calcification should be assessed on basal acquisitions (or on spectral data of dual-energy datasets), the other features require the administration of contrast material [78].
The most frequent causes of mildly enhancing lymph nodes are lymphoma, sarcoidosis, or lung cancer metastases. Notably, lymphomas usually grow and expand along the existing structures, while lung cancer metastases may have a mass effect or an infiltrative growth [85,86,87].
Hyper-enhancing nodes are suggestive for metastases from hypervascular cancers (i.e., melanoma, renal cell carcinoma) or for Castleman disease [78,88].
Hypo-attenuating lymph nodes usually correspond to cystic or necrotic degeneration (e.g., metastases from lung or testicular cancers) [15]. The presence of ring enhancement surrounding the central necrotic core can correspond to infectious diseases, such as mycobacterial or fungal infection. Anamnestic information (such as travels in endemic areas) together with clinical symptoms and pulmonary findings may orient the diagnosis to pulmonary and mediastinal infections [89,90].
Calcified lymph nodes can be observed in several conditions, mostly granulomatous diseases. Healed or remitted tuberculosis may present completely calcified lymph nodes, usually asymmetrical. In sarcoidosis or silicosis, the mediastinal enlarged lymph nodes are symmetrical and bilateral, with variable pattern of calcification (e.g., peripheral or eggshell, diffuse, central, or hazy). The clinical and anamnestic data, together with pulmonary findings, are helpful to achieve the correct diagnosis [75,78,86,91,92]. Mediastinal lipomatosis is the excess adipose tissue mostly seen in obese patients or after steroid therapy. On CXR it may occasionally appear as a massive lesion; however, chest CT confirms the normal finding of diffuse, unencapsulated tissue with homogeneous fat attenuation surrounding anatomic structures in all mediastinal compartments [93].

3. Differential Diagnosis of Pleural Lesions

Pleural disease is first suspected on CXR only in advanced cases because of the presence of indirect signs (i.e., pleural effusion or pneumothorax); however, CT and MRI are the modalities of choice for further characterization [94,95,96]. On CT, the first step is to determine whether the lesion comes from the pulmonary parenchyma or the pleura: the presence of an acute angle between the lesion and the thoracic wall means a pulmonary origin, while an obtuse angle suggests a pleural disease [97]. Pleural lesions, unlike the extrapleural ones, usually do not cause the erosion of the ribs or the outward displacement of the extrapleural fat [97]. Pleural lesions can be grouped into tumor (benign and malignant) and tumorlike conditions [98]. Malignant neoplasms are more common than benign neoplasms. Pleural thickenings can be focal (>5 mm) or diffuse (>25% of the chest wall if bilateral and >50% if unilateral) [99]. Imaging features suggesting pleural malignancy (primary or secondary) are nodular (>1 cm) pleural thickening, with circumferential involvement (mostly for mediastinal pleural), enhancement after contrast media administration, and the presence of unilateral pleural effusion [100,101]. CT is the gold standard for the evaluation of pleural disease; a late-phase acquisition (70 s after the contrast media administration) further improves the accuracy [102].
A potential pitfall in the identification of focal, non-calcified, pleural thickening in the posterior–basal location at supine scans is the focal accumulation of lymphatic fluid within pleural layers because of gravity; in these cases, an additional prone acquisition could rule out diagnostic doubt [103,104].

3.1. Pleural Neoplasms

Most of the features mentioned above are typical for primary pleural malignant neoplasm, the most common of which is pleural mesothelioma (PM) [105]. It demonstrates a very aggressive behavior, invading the mediastinum, chest wall, and diaphragm and often showing lung nodules and carcinomatous lymphangitis [106,107]. These patients are usually in their sixth or seventh decade of life, they have a history of exposure to asbestos fibers (average latency of 35–40 years), and they can show other signs of asbestosis, such as benign pleural plaques (average latency of 20 years) [108,109].
Although PM is the most common primary malignant pleural tumor, the first cause overall of pleural effusion and tumor nodules is metastatic pleural disease. Differentiation from PM is difficult: unilateral involvement and volume loss of affected the hemithorax favors PM [98,108]. Common cancers that metastasize to the pleural space are breast, lung, lymphoma, ovary, and gastrointestinal primary carcinomas [91]. Therefore, when CT images suggest malignant pleural disease, the presence of a primary tumor must be ruled out [110].
The solitary fibrous tumor is a benign, relatively uncommon pleural neoplasm with a peak incidence in patients >50 years of age. It is often misinterpreted by inexpert radiologists since it typically appears like a solitary, lobulated soft-tissue mass usually involving the inferior hemithorax with areas of necrosis, hemorrhage, calcifications (up to 26%), cystic changes, and with heterogeneous enhancement [100,111]. In 20% of cases, they can be malignant; the findings suggesting malignancy are the presence of calcification, effusion, atelectasis, mediastinal shift, and chest wall invasion [112].
Other primary pleural malignant tumors to be considered are pleural sarcomas and primary lymphomas; however, they are very rare.

3.2. Tumorlike Pleural Lesions

As mentioned before, pleural plaques can be calcified or not and are the most common manifestation of asbestos exposure occurring with a latency of 20–30 years. However, there is no risk of malignant degeneration, but these patients may have an increased risk of PM and lung carcinoma because of the exposition to toxic agents [110,113]. These lesions are a quite common incidental finding since they are asymptomatic and usually are located on the posterolateral aspect of the lower ribs, parietal pleura, and the diaphragm dome while the visceral pleura, costophrenic angles, and lung apices are characteristically spared. In the case of non-calcified plaques, the differential diagnosis with pleural carcinomatosis may be challenging. In such cases, it has been demonstrated that iodine maps, obtained from dual-energy CT (DECT) acquisition, are helpful to differentiate non-calcified benign pleural lesions from pleural carcinomatosis with a higher sensitivity and specificity than conventional CT [114].
Thoracic splenosis should be considered in case of pleural, highly enhancing nodules (multiple or solitary) in patients with a history of splenic or diaphragmatic trauma, or surgery. It is a tumorlike condition caused by the autotransplantation of splenic tissue into the pleural cavity (latency of <10 years). Usually, the lesion has the same imaging features as the spleen (if still present); however, there can be doubtful cases, mostly because the nodules increase in size. In such cases, the gold standard for diagnosis is scintigraphy with 99mTc heat-damaged tagged erythrocytes [115].
A similar condition, but very rare, is the thoracic endometriosis, since the pleura is the most common extra-abdominal location for endometrial tissue. In this case, the ectopic implant of endometrial tissue in the pleural cavity may cause back pain, pneumothorax, or recurrent hemothorax, with the onset of menses in childbearing women with a history of endometriosis [115]. Furthermore, in this case, pleural highly enhancing nodules (multiple or solitary) are present; they characteristically reveal cyclical changes in temporal relation with menses and can present the distinctive posterosuperior location of diaphragmatic lesions [116].
Another rare but characteristic diagnosis is Erdheim–Chester disease (ECD), which is a multisystemic disorder classified as a non-Langerhans cell histiocytosis [117]. It should be suspected in the case of symmetric circumferential pleural thickening or effusion, smooth interlobular septal thickening, and pericardial thickening. Additional findings are the characteristic perirenal soft-tissue encasement (“hairy kidney sign”) and symmetric skeletal abnormalities as long bone sclerosis often involving the distal femoral meta-diaphyses [98,117]. The extraosseous disease occurs in half of the patients, and the central nervous system, lungs, heart, and retroperitoneum may also be affected; chest involvement has been reported in less than half of patients affected by this disease. Long bone radiographs and radionuclide bone scintigraphy should be performed to confirm this rare diagnosis [98,117].
The IgG4-related disease is a rare immune condition characterized by increased serum levels of IgG4 with organ infiltration by IgG4-positive plasma cells or lymph plasmacytes. Even though the more frequent manifestations include the abdominal district (e.g., autoimmune pancreatitis, nephritis, sclerosing cholangitis, lymphadenopathy, retroperitoneal fibrosis, and sclerosing mesenteritis), up to 13% of patients present pleuropulmonary involvement [118,119]. The pleural manifestation is mainly with a focal thickening of the parietal or visceral pleura, with or without parenchymal involvement [120]. On the other hand, pulmonary involvement has a variable presentation (from solid nodules or mass-like lesions to alveolar and interstitial involvement) [121].
The imaging appearances of previous treatments (until the 1950s) of tuberculosis may have an historical interest in very elderly patients [122]. A common theory behind these treatments was that the collapsed parenchyma would accelerate the healing. This was achieved by placing inert materials such as acrylic balls, rubber sheets, or oils in surgical cavities (plombage), or by direct intra- or extra-pleural injection of paraffin oil (oleothorax), to treat bronchopleural fistulas, empyema, or pneumothorax [123,124]. These materials have various radiographic appearance and are usually detected as pleural or subpleural masses [123,124].

4. Differential Diagnosis of the Parenchymal Disease

CXR is usually the first examination performed to rule out pulmonary diseases because of its high availability and sensitivity. However, even with the efforts for improvements, it lacks specificity [2,125]. The evaluation of parenchymal lesions mainly relies on CT; with recent technological improvements, it is possible to perform low-dose CT (LDCT) with image quality comparable to the conventional CT [2,126,127]. This is valuable mostly for patients that need several follow-up CT (e.g., chronic lung diseases, evaluation of the response to treatments) and has opened the possibility to CT lung cancer screening [127,128,129,130,131]. Other advanced imaging modalities (i.e., chest-MRI or FDG–PET) are more useful for lung cancer staging than for diagnostic purposes, also allowing for the provision of a more precise target for potential biopsies [132,133,134,135].

4.1. Focal Lung Involvement

According to the Fleischner Society, a “lung nodule” is a rounded opacity, well or poorly defined, measuring up to 3 cm in diameter; if the lesion is >3 cm it is defined as a “mass” and should be considered indicative of lung cancer until histologically otherwise proven [79,136]. With the terrific increase in the number of CT performed yearly, the incidental detection of solitary pulmonary nodules (SPNs) has consequently increased, with an overall reported incidence of 8–51% [137,138]. The differential diagnosis for SPN is extremely broad: given the poor prognosis of lung cancer, the first step is to assess the likelihood of early lung cancer. The Fleischner Society proposed a model for the management of incidentally detected SPN in patients >35 years old, not immunocompromised, and not with known primary cancers; this model stratifies the risk based on the SPN size and presence of risk factors (i.e., smoking, emphysema and fibrosis, family history of lung cancer) [139].
Size and growth positively correlate with the likelihood of malignancy; however, just as malignancy is not excluded in small SPN, growth or big nodules are not unequivocally signs of malignancy [140]. The evaluation of the SPN considers clinical factors and morphology, and the radiologist must be aware that imaging features of benign and malignant nodules may overlap [141]. PET/CT with 18F-FDG can be an additional tool, since small nodules (<8 mm), adenocarcinoma precursors or with lepidic growth, and carcinoids can show low or no uptake [142]. Therefore, the second step is to carefully evaluate the density (solid or subsolid), morphology (shape, margins), composition (fatty, cavitations, and calcifications), and additional findings. Table 3 summarizes some general features to take into consideration in this process. Some more detailed considerations for the main morphological features to evaluate at CT imaging are reported below.
Typical features suggestive for malignancy (i.e., primary lung cancer) are a solid nodule >1 cm with spiculated margins, lobulated borders, irregular shape, showing a significant enhancement (20–60 HU) after contrast media injection, or volume doubling time (VDT) in the follow-up CT scans of 30–400 days; possible additional findings as pleural tags or satellite nodules are also considered [143,144]. Regarding the VDT, the equation used for calculation assumes a constant cellular division rate with exponential volume increase [145]. The VDT for solid nodules is well established, being 30–400 days for the majority of them. Conversely, subsolid nodules have a more indolent growth with a VDT of 3–5 years [146,147]. This results in longer follow-up intervals and periods for the subsolid nodules [139,148].
If the nodules (or masses) are multiple, with soft-tissue attenuation, varying in size, with basal predominance (due to blood flow), then metastatic disease is the first hypothesis to be investigated [149]. Primary tumors that commonly metastasize to the lungs are breast, colon–rectum, kidneys, head and neck, and thyroid cancers [149].
In the last years, the American College of Radiology (ACR) has coordinated the development of the Lung CT Screening Reporting & Data System (Lung-RADS), recently updated with version 2022 [150]. The algorithm is based on the imaging characteristics of the nodules detected on LDCT in the screening setting and provides a five-point score with increasing probability of malignancy. For each category, the Lung-RADS system also provides the recommendation for the management of observation, from follow-up with LDCT to the integrated diagnostic workup in case of suspicious nodules [151]. The CT features included in the Lung-RADS system are discussed in the next sections.

4.1.1. Density

The first step is the assessment of the attenuation of the SPN and to define whether it is solid or subsolid. If the nodule obscures the underlying structures (bronchial and vascular), it is defined as “solid” [79]. A “subsolid nodule” contains a proportion of ground-glass opacity (GGO), where the underlying structures are still visible through the higher density parenchyma; in this case, it is a “part-solid nodule”, otherwise, if the whole nodule is composed of GGO, it is a “pure GGO nodule” [79]. The Early Lung Cancer Action Project (ELCAP) highlighted that subsolid nodules have a significantly higher risk of malignancy compared to solid nodules, respectively, 34% versus 7%, and should usually undergo close follow-up (3 months) [152,153]. In part-solid nodules, the GGO component may assume the so-called halo sign, where the GGO circumscribes the solid component of the nodule. In malignant nodules, the halo sign is caused by local tumor spread (i.e., lepidic growth pattern) where tumor cells proliferate along the surface of intact alveolar walls without stromal or vascular invasion [154,155]. These lesions are recognized as minimally invasive adenocarcinoma (MIA) and lepidic predominant adenocarcinoma (LPA) by the new World Health Organization (WHO) classification [156]. However, the “halo sign” can be related also to benign conditions such as eosinophilic pneumonia, organizing pneumonia, tuberculosis, cytomegalovirus, herpes simplex virus, and aspergillus infection (this mostly for patients affected by neutropenia). However, in these cases, the nodules usually disappear at the follow-up [157,158]. Conversely, a malignant part-solid nodule persists at the follow-up and characteristically changes in morphology, rather than size, with an increase in the solid component over the GGO (Figure 3) [139,159,160,161].
Evaluation of the growth at the follow-up can be challenging, mostly for part-nodules, because of their slow growth; therefore, evaluation with computer-aided volumetry is recommended [139]. The complement of the “halo sign” is the “reversed-halo sign” where the GGO is surrounded by a ring of consolidation; this is related to cryptogenic organizing pneumonia or to lung cancer nodules after radiofrequency ablation [162].

4.1.2. Shape

The typical SPN has a round or oval shape [163]. It is important to evaluate the morphology of perifissural nodules since they commonly represent intrapulmonary lymph nodes (ILN) [164]. ILN are small (<10 mm), triangular or polygonal, elongated in shape, and characteristically lie within 15 mm of a pleural surface [140,164,165]. ILN may present the same doubling time (DBT) as malignant nodules, and this is not considered a sign of malignancy; conversely, the presence of spiculated margins or crossing the fissure requires further workup [140,166,167].
Another characteristic benign entity is the rounded atelectasis, which can be found in relation to previous pleural effusion or history of asbestos exposition with pleural thickening or pleuritis [168]. On CT it demonstrates a characteristically rounded, mass-like appearance with a predilection for the lower pulmonary lobes, and it is strictly related to the pleural surface [168,169]. Rounded atelectasis may have the classical “comet tail sign” due to the pulling of the bronchovascular bundles close to the lesion and, less commonly, the presence of some linear bands raising from the lesion (“crow feet sign”) [170,171]. It is crucial to recognize this entity, since, as it represents a collapsed lung, it commonly demonstrates a typical parenchymal enhancement and could be misinterpreted as malignant [168,169].

4.1.3. Margins

The margins can be defined as smooth, which usually are associated with benignity, or with lobulation or spiculation, more commonly related to the presence of malignancy. However, this is not a “golden” rule since it is reported that about 21–33% of malignant SPNs demonstrate smooth margins, and lobulated margins can be seen in benign hamartomas [142,172,173]. Conversely, spiculations are highly predictive of malignancy (positive predictive value of 90%) and are a sign of invasiveness [173,174,175]. While measuring a spiculated SPN, the spiculation should be kept out of the measurement to improve the reproducibility [139]. It should be noted that also some benign conditions demonstrate spiculated margins, such as infection tuberculomas, inflammatory pseudotumors, focal atelectasis, and fibrosis; however, in such cases, the malignant hypothesis should be always ruled out [175].
An additional finding to be considered is the presence of pleural retraction (pleural tag). This is more common in malignant SPNs; it is a sign of invasiveness but it is rare in metastatic disease or carcinoid [79,174,176,177].

4.1.4. Fat Attenuation

As previously mentioned for mediastinal lesions, fat content can be easily assessed on CT with a soft-tissue window; the attenuation values range from −40 to −120 HU [178]. Intralesional fat is highly suggestive of hamartoma; these benign lesions usually show dimensional stability over time, well-defined lobular or notched borders, and calcification with a “popcorn” shape (see below) [144,172]. However, 50% of hamartomas do not show intralesional fat on CT; MRI with chemical shift sequences is more effective than CT for the detection of intralesional fat that can be associated to other imaging findings of hamartoma [179]. The additional findings of hamartoma should be always detected since metastases from liposarcoma and renal cell carcinoma may present as SPN with fat content.

4.1.5. Calcifications

The presence of calcification in an SPN can be easily evaluated with the bone window and it is widely considered a sign of benignity [180]. However, the different morphology of the calcification may suggest malignancy or benignity. Specifically, the presence of diffuse, central, lamellated calcification of SPNs suggests the benign etiology [181]. These patterns could be associated with prior infections such as histoplasmosis or tuberculosis, and they are usually multiple, a few millimeters in diameter, and represent granulomas [181].
As previously mentioned, the “popcorn-like” calcifications are considered characteristic of pulmonary hamartoma when found in combination with intralesional fat [172,178]. Eccentric, dystrophic, or punctate calcifications are indeterminate, sometimes benign, and related to granulomatous disease; they also occur in malignant lesions such as carcinoid tumors, lung cancer, and metastatic disease (osteosarcoma, chondrosarcoma, and mucinous adenocarcinoma); they are not a helpful discriminator between benign and malignant nodules (Figure 2) [142,182,183].

4.1.6. Cavitations and Cysts

A cavity is defined as a gas-filled space within a pulmonary consolidation, mass, or nodule [79]. It can be associated with either a neoplastic (primary lung cancer, metastasis) or an infectious disease (including bacterial, mycobacterial, and fungal infections) as well as inflammatory disease (e.g., vasculitis, pulmonary Langerhans cell histiocytosis) [184]. Smooth and thin walls (usually <5 mm) are usually associated with benign conditions; on the other hand, thick (>15 mm), irregular, and nodular walls, are associated with malignancy. However, there is great overlap between benign and malignant, since lung cancer can occur as cysts with thin walls or lung abscesses can have a thick wall [185]. The association of other imaging features can help in the differential diagnosis: ground glass, consolidation, bronchial wall thickening, and satellite nodules are indicative of a benign nature of the cavitary SPN. The presence of an inner fluid level, rim contrast enhancement, and ancillary findings of pulmonary infection (e.g., consolidation, tree-in-bud opacities, pleural fluid) may be suggestive of a lung abscess (Figure 1) [186]. Cavitations could also occur after chemo- and radiotherapy, or antiangiogenic agents, and they are thought to be secondary to tumor necrosis or a valve effect on an adjacent bronchus [184].
If the cavitated lesions are multiple and show similar morphology one each other, the differential diagnosis is among an infectious (TBC or fungal infections), inflammatory (vasculitis), or metastatic disease (squamous cell lung cancer, head and neck, gastrointestinal adenocarcinomas, sarcomas, breast cancer); all of them can show the “feeding vessel sign” (a pulmonary artery branch leading to the SPN) (Figure 4) [149].
Metastases usually demonstrate a diffuse distribution, while septic emboli usually are peripheral, multiple, round or wedge-shaped, with lower lobe predominance, and may not show contrast enhancement [187]. The suspicion of septic emboli can be supported by the presence of predisposing conditions of infective foci spread (infective endocarditis, infected deep venous thrombosis, periodontal disease) or the presence of some medical devices favoring infection (catheters, venous lines, central venous catheters, pacemaker wires) (Figure 1, Figure 3 and Figure 4) [188,189].
Fungal infections (Aspergillus spp. or Cryptococcus spp.) can be suspected in an immunocompromised patient, with acute onset of infective state with nodules possibly showing the “halo sign” (due to surrounding hemorrhage) (Figure 3) [190]. Granulomatosis with polyangiitis (GPA) is another possible condition to consider in a non-oncological patient, presenting with multiple lung nodules with cavitation, random distribution, and different size and morphology. It is a necrotizing non-caseating granulomatous vasculitis of small to medium-sized vessels affecting lungs, kidneys, and airways [191,192]. Characteristically, the nodules of GPA tend to “migrate” over time, modifying their location and size; this finding paired with the presence of lesions of the upper respiratory tract and c-ANCA positivity is strongly suggestive of GPA [192,193].
The best way to assess the diagnosis in cavitated nodules is a short-term follow-up since infectious (bacterial) or inflammatory cavitation often presents with rapid changes and correlation with clinical data and blood cultures [194].
Other air-containing signs are the broncogram, intranodular bubble-like lucencies, or cystic airspaces. The air bronchogram in the setting of lung consolidation has to be considered benign; however, in the context of an SPN, it is more commonly associated with malignancy [79,195,196]. In addition, the presence of intranodular, bubble-like lucencies or cystic airspaces is common in neoplastic nodules [79,197,198,199]. Specifically, the progressive wall thickening or the presence of a nodule in- or outside a cystic airspace should raise the suspicion of malignancy [200]. These findings have been recognized as a feature of early malignant disease; thus, a short-time follow-up or a specific diagnostic workup is recommended [201]. These concepts have been included in the latest version of Lung-RADS with the definition of “Atypical Pulmonary Cyst” [141,151].

4.2. Diffuse Lung Disease

The first step in diffuse lung disease is to recognize the predominant pattern and its distribution along the pulmonary parenchyma on a high-resolution CT (HRCT). Four main patterns are described: reticular pattern, nodular pattern, and increased and decreased lung attenuation [202].

4.2.1. Reticular Pattern

Reticular opacities at HRCT scans indicate the presence of diffuse lung infiltration; three principal patterns may be seen: interlobular septal thickening (smooth and nodular), honeycombing, and irregular reticulation [1,79].

Interlobular Septal Thickening

Smooth interlobular septal thickening—In patients with acute dyspnea and chronic heart failure, it is commonly related to pulmonary edema. It is characteristically bilateral and symmetric with predominance in the lower lobes, and it is related to the fluids overload into the septal lymphatic vessels [1]. Conversely, in an oncological patient (mostly breast, lung, or gastrointestinal tract cancers), this finding is suspicious for early pulmonary lymphangitis carcinomatosis (PLC) [203]. In this case, as for other regions, the lymphatic vessels outflow is impaired by the metastatic infiltration and will progress in nodular septal thickening [203,204,205,206]. Associated findings to PLC are the presence of hilar and mediastinal lymphadenopathy, “peribronchial cuffing”, and pleural effusion [207,208]. Similarly, in lymphoid interstitial pneumonia (LIP), a rare, benign lymphoproliferative disorder, lymphocytic proliferation leads to smooth interlobular septal thickening; however, this is an ancillary finding since the disease is mainly associated with thin-walled cysts (see below) [209]. Two rare conditions that can be associated with smooth septal thickening are Erdheim–Chester disease (ECD) and the Niemann–Pick disease (type B); these conditions usually do not have a primary lung involvement and the diagnosis can be suspected on other extrapulmonary findings. Specifically, ECD may also present pleural thickening or effusion, “hairy kidneys”, and osteosclerosis of the long bones [210]. Conversely, Niemann-Pick type B disease is associated with hepatosplenomegaly with or without calcifications, calcified lung nodules, and early development of atherosclerosis disease [211].
Nodular interlobular septal thickening—It is a sign of cellular distribution within the septal lymphatics; therefore, the first differential diagnosis to be ruled out is PLC [1,79]. However, when symmetrical, bilateral mediastinal lymphadenopathy (often calcific) is present in a non-oncological patient, <40 years of age, sarcoidosis should be considered. Nodules usually have a perilymphatic distribution involving subpleural, peribronchovascular (mostly in perihilar regions), and centrilobular interstitium and tend to be distributed in a patchy fashion. Additionally, erythema nodosum can be present [212,213]. Pneumoconioses (silicosis and coal workers’ pneumoconiosis) have a quite similar appearance to sarcoidosis and can be indistinguishable at CT scans. However, pneumoconioses usually are associated to a sign of fibrosis because of exposure to inorganic dust, and a clinical history of exposure is necessary for the diagnosis [214,215]. A rare pathology associated with this pattern is amyloidosis; this is a complex and variegate pathology characterized by extracellular accumulation of amyloid. Since the lungs are not one of the primary organs involved, it is better to first evaluate the presence of suspicious findings in other districts (kidneys, heart, nervous system, and liver) [216].

Honeycombing

Honeycombing is defined as clustered cystic airspaces, typically of comparable diameters (3–10 mm) with well-defined walls (1–3 mm) and subpleural distribution [79]. Occasionally, cystic airspaces can be as large as 25 mm (macrocystic honey combing). Honeycombing is the most specific sign of fibrosis, and can be associated with heterogeneous subpleural reticular opacities, traction bronchiectasis, and a lower lobe predominance to give the “usual interstitial pneumonia (UIP) pattern” [217]. Conversely, in absence of honeycombing, the presence of reticular pattern with subpleural basal predominance defines the “probable UIP pattern”. Other features, such as mild ground-glass opacities (GGOs) or distortion, or subtle reticulation with subpleural and basal predominance, define the “indeterminate pattern for UIP”. Finally, the presence of other findings such as cysts, mosaic attenuation, predominant GGO, nodules and consolidations, with peribronchovascular or perilymphatic distribution at the upper or mid lungs, suggests an “alternative diagnosis to UIP” [217].
The UIP pattern includes in the differential diagnosis idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF), connective tissue diseases (CTD), asbestosis, drug-induced lung disease (DILD), and chronic hypersensitivity pneumonitis (HP) [1].
IPF is the term for the clinical syndrome associated with the CT pattern of UIP, and it is associated with smoking [218,219]. The presence of a “probable UIP pattern” or “indeterminate pattern for UIP” does not rule out the diagnosis of the UIP/IPF, since it can be detected at pathology in nearly 30% of cases for each of the two CT patterns [220]. However, if a patient with a UIP pattern has a disease or exposure that is known to be associated with this pattern (e.g., collagen disease and asbestos exposure), by definition, the diagnosis cannot be IPF [1,218]. Therefore, in the presence of a UIP pattern at the HRCT scan, always think of an IPF and exclude all the other known causes for a UIP pattern [1,218]. Since IPF is one of the interstitial pneumonias (IP) with the worst prognosis, a lung biopsy should be performed for diagnosis of certainty in case of probable or indeterminate CT patterns of UIP [218,220]. Different density scores have been developed to assess lung involvement in IPF, but quantitative scores demonstrated the best correlation with lung function [221]. Since these patients usually have a history of smoking, it is important to correctly differentiate honeycombing from paraseptal emphysema where the cysts present thin walls and are distributed in a single layer (Table 4) [222].
Mild honeycombing (microcystic) could be present in advanced stages of nonspecific interstitial pneumonia (NSIP); this is in combination with patchy GGO, irregular linear or reticular opacities, and scattered micronodules [218]. Unlike IPF, NSIP findings have homogeneous distribution (no obvious gradient) with typical subpleural sparing and usually demonstrate a good response to corticosteroid therapy, and exposure to cigarette smoking does not seem to be related. As UIP, NSIP could be related to CTD, HP, and DILD. NSIP is the most common pattern seen in patients with CTD; specifically, it is most typical of scleroderma, polymyositis, dermatomyositis, and mixed CTD. The UIP pattern is more common in rheumatoid arthritis.

Irregular Reticulation

The presence of irregular reticulation is indicative but nonspecific of fibrosis, and it may be seen in association with other reticular findings that could help in diagnosis. As previously mentioned, when associated with honeycombing and traction bronchiectasis (UIP pattern), it can be assumed to reflect fibrosis. In this case, it is the presence of honeycombing that is most important for the differential diagnosis.
When irregular reticulation is associated with GGO and traction bronchiectasis is absent, consider an infiltrative or inflammatory disease as the most likely (NSIP pattern). In this setting, consider radiation-induced lung diseases (RILD) in the acute phase for oncologic patients who underwent chest radiation therapy (latency <6 months) who demonstrate fatigue and respiratory symptoms [223,224,225,226]. In the acute phase of RILD, GGO can be associated with consolidations in the region of treatment and may completely resolve or evolve to volume loss, and reticular septal thickening with traction bronchiectasis in the late phase [227]. Differential diagnosis is often required to exclude infections (which have characteristic clinical data and abrupt onset), lymphangitis carcinomatosis (which usually evolves in worse symptoms and radiological manifestations), and malignancy recurrence (for which usually FDG—PET could be diriment) [227].
CTD and DILD are also in the differential diagnosis for irregular reticulation associated with GGO. Pleural and pericardial thickening or effusion may coexist and may be useful for diagnosis. In scleroderma, associated findings such as pulmonary hypertension and esophageal dilation (up to 80% of cases) may be present. DILD (e.g., by chemotherapy or amiodarone) is a challenging diagnosis; it may be associated with several possible appearances on HRCT. The most common patterns of lung injury associated with DILD include NSIP and UIP patterns, pulmonary edema, pulmonary hemorrhage, diffuse alveolar damage (DAD), organizing pneumonia (OP), and eosinophilic pneumonia [228]. These CT patterns are associated with drug toxicities, but there are no HRCT findings that specifically suggest drug toxicity. The exception is the presence of hyperdense consolidations that are highly suggestive for amiodarone and its metabolites accumulation into macrophages [229]. A high degree of suspicion and correlation with medication history is necessary to make a confident diagnosis.
When associated with air trapping in a post-expiratory scan, irregular reticulation can be related to chronic HP, chronic sarcoidosis, or CTD-ILD [1].
The statements above are the simplification of a complex topic regarding the IP, where often the differential diagnosis between UIP and NSIP patterns is not plain; for these reasons, structured reporting and a multidisciplinary evaluation are recommended [230,231,232].

4.2.2. Nodular Pattern

The nodular pattern is defined by the presence of multiple roundish pulmonary opacities ranging in diameter from 2 to 10 mm as the predominant finding [79]. The HRCT evaluation is based on morphology, density, and distribution in the craniocaudal direction, and the relation to the secondary pulmonary lobule (perilymphatic, centrilobular, or random) of the nodules [1,79].

Perilymphatic Nodules

Nodules with a perilymphatic pattern are characteristic of diseases involving the pulmonary lymphatics [1,233]. It grossly replicates the same pathological scheme of the nodular interlobular septal thickening mentioned above; it can be in association with granulomatous disease (sarcoidosis, pneumoconiosis), amyloidosis, or neoplastic diseases (adenocarcinoma, lymphoma, PLC) [1,233]. The differential can be made through the investigation of the patient’s history and the presence of an ancillary sign, as the “galaxy sign” for sarcoidosis where the nodules coalesce in a large parenchymal nodule [79,234].

Centrilobular Nodules

Centrilobular nodules occur in diseases that primarily involve structures at the center of the secondary pulmonary lobule (bronchiole, artery, or peribronchiolar lymphatics) [1,79,235]. Characteristically, the nodules demonstrate regular spacing among each other and sparing of subpleural interstitium [79,233,235]. This pattern is more frequently related to the peripheral airway disease, and when it is in association with other smoked-related features such as emphysema, predominantly in the upper lobes, the diagnosis of respiratory bronchiolitis—interstitial lung disease (RB-ILD) can be placed confidently [218,219,236]. Nevertheless, if centrilobular nodules are observed in a non-smoker patient with a history of inhalation of specific antigens (usually organic such as fungi, bacteria, protozoa, or animal proteins), suffering from episodes of acute illness with dyspnea and coughing, it could be suggestive of hypersensitivity pneumonitis (HP) [237]. In acute onset, it is possible to see the combination of patchy ground-glass opacities, normal regions, and low-attenuated areas (expression of air trapping), often described as a “three-density pattern” (or “headcheese sign”). Bronchiolar wall thickening and mediastinal lymph node enlargement are frequently associated [238]. Centrilobular, ill-defined nodules together with with patchy GGO and tree-in-bud are usually related to the endobronchial spread of bronchiolitis (bacterial, viral, or fungal). The association with acute symptomatology (e.g., fever and cough) and laboratory evidence of infection are useful to confirm the CT suspicion [233,235,239].
Another structure within the central lobe is the central arteriole, which can be involved in vasculitides. Specifically, microscopic polyangiitis, eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis, and giant cell arteritis can present pulmonary involvement with centrilobular nodules [240,241].

Random Nodules

Random nodules have no specific pattern of distribution to the lung structures or the pulmonary lobule [79,233]. Several conditions with hematogenous spread are associated with random nodules. The most common conditions depicted by this pattern are hematogenous metastases: these nodules are usually of soft-tissue attenuation and may show a basilar predominance in size and number [1]. Other conditions can be septic emboli and miliary tuberculosis [233]. Similar findings can be related to post-primary tuberculosis (TBC) in immunocompromised patients, but it is usually associated to lymphadenopathy, pulmonary consolidation, and pleural effusion [242]. Further laboratory tests are needed for the diagnosis of TBC [242].

4.2.3. Increased Lung Attenuation

Increased lung attenuation includes two categories of findings: ground-glass opacities and consolidations.

Ground-Glass Opacities

Ground-glass opacities (GGOs) have been defined above; they do not represent a specific HRCT finding, as may represent either alveolar disease or interstitial disease [79]. Association with acute (<6 weeks) or chronic (>6 weeks) symptoms could be helpful for the differential diagnosis [243,244].
Patients with acute respiratory symptoms and HRCT depicting patchy and peripheral ground-glass opacities (GGOs), in combination with smooth septal thickening and airspace consolidation, are likely to be affected by pneumonia, especially COVID-19. This new entity has partially changed the diagnostic workflow since CT findings can be supportive of the diagnosis of COVID-19 in patients with a negative nasopharyngeal swab, thanks to the high sensitivity and good interreader agreement of CT [245,246,247,248]. Even if the role of CXR is still debated, it is unequivocally useful in bedridden patients for evaluation of response to treatments, especially in patients treated with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) in an intensive care unit (ICU) [249,250,251,252]. Some authors also proposed MRI as a more sensitive imaging modality that does not require radiation exposure in the follow-up of COVID-19 patients [253]. Several scores and CT signs were developed in an attempt to predict prognosis, hospitalization, and response to treatments; however, they are usually time-consuming and poorly applicable in daily clinical practice [254,255,256,257,258,259,260,261,262,263]. In this setting, artificial intelligence is showing promising results for reducing the workload, especially in the oncological setting [264,265,266,267,268,269,270]. Several studies have suggested an increased incidence of pulmonary embolism in COVID-19 patients, with associated higher mortality [271,272,273,274,275,276,277,278]. In the pandemic setting, the significant increase of requests for CT and CT pulmonary angiography examinations, often repeated in hospitalized patients, have raised concerns about the radiation protection and iodine load. The use of CT protocols optimized with iterative reconstructions and artificial intelligence, and dual-energy CT, are helpful in this condition and in particular in younger patients [279,280,281].
In patients affected by chronic heart failure, with acute symptoms, the presence of acute pulmonary edema should be investigated. As previously mentioned, it is characterized by diffuse and bilateral GGO and interlobular septal thickening; the presence of heart enlargement can be helpful in cases of unknown patient history or when the underlying condition is unknown [282].
In patients with hemoptysis, anemia, and hypoxemic respiratory failure, diffuse alveolar hemorrhage (DAH) is the most probable cause of patchy lobular GGO. When HRCT and clinical features are suggestive of DAH, progressively hemorrhagic bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) found in serial samples is diagnostic of DAH [135,283,284].
In oncological and immunocompromised patients showing GGO associated with smooth septal thickening with a slow onset of dry cough and dyspnea, it is important to take into consideration opportunistic and atypical infection, such as Pneumocystis Jiroveci Pneumonia (PJP) [285]. Imaging findings for this pathology are not specific at onset; then, paired with rapid respiratory deterioration, diffuse areas of crazy-paving pattern and patchy airspace consolidations occur in association with the presence of lung cysts [285,286].
Some diffuse lung diseases are associated with GGO, both in the acute and the chronic setting. These are eosinophilic pneumonia and hypersensitivity pneumonitis (HP). Acute eosinophilic pneumonia (AEP) is a quite rare entity that should be suspected in patients with bilateral areas of GGO associated with thin nodular septal thickening. These patients demonstrate a serologic increase in eosinophils and hypoxemia after an acute febrile illness. Since peripheral blood eosinophils are usually normal in the acute setting at presentation, this serological finding during the course of disease should raise suspicion of AEP. The definitive diagnosis can be confirmed by the prompt response to corticosteroids, or at BAL that demonstrates an eosinophilic count greater than 25% [287,288]. Most cases of AEP are idiopathic; however, the association with exposure to cigarette smoke or drugs has been described [288]. In the chronic setting, eosinophilic pneumonia (CEP) maintains elevated peripheral blood eosinophils, and nonsegmental areas of airspace consolidation with peripheral upper lobe predominance are present on CT [289]. A rare, chronic entity with increased eosinophils is Churg–Strauss syndrome; it is an eosinophilic vasculitis characterized by hypereosinophilia, asthma, paranasal sinus abnormalities, and bilateral peripheral opacities. However, unlike CEP, in this case, consolidations tend to have lobular distribution associated with centrilobular nodules [288].
HP could have an acute, subacute, or chronic presentation; it is observed in non-smoker patients with a history of inhalation of specific organic antigens. Most cases occur following months or years of continuous or intermittent inhalation of the inciting agent [237]. In acute onset, it demonstrates normal lung regions mixed with patchy GGO. In the chronic setting, there is the onset of fibrotic signs and air trapping, as previously mentioned. This pattern is often described as the “three-density pattern” (or “headcheese sign”). Bronchiolar wall thickening and mediastinal lymph node enlargement are frequently associated [238].
Desquamative interstitial pneumonia (DIP) is typical for heavy smokers and can be considered the end spectrum of RB-ILD. The presence of peripheral and subpleural diffuse GGO with basal predominance reflects the alveolar accumulation of pigmented macrophages [219]. Unlike in RB-ILD, functional tests show a marked reduction in diffusion capacity and a moderate restrictive pattern, which results in severe dyspnea and stress hypoxemia [290].
Although rare, pulmonary alveolar proteinosis (PAP) is worth a short mention, since it classically demonstrates clinical–radiologic discrepancy where the patient does not demonstrate relevant symptoms but extensive bilateral, central, and symmetric GGO with superimposed smooth interlobular septal thickening (“crazy paving”) are present [291]. This is a mostly idiopathic condition, and definitive diagnosis requires lung biopsy or BAL specimens which demonstrate intra-alveolar deposits of proteinaceous material [292].

Consolidations

On CT, a consolidation is a homogeneous increase in the pulmonary density that obscures the airway walls and vascular structures; it is the consequence of an exudate or other materials in several pathological processes [79]. For the differential diagnosis of consolidations, the acute or chronic condition, together with the distribution and ancillary findings, are helpful for the characterization.
In an acute setting, the most frequent diseases to be considered are infectious pneumonia and aspiration. Among infections, viral pneumonia, atypical bacterial pneumonia (e.g., legionella, mycoplasma, and chlamydia), and PJP usually present with a diffuse pattern, but a GGO pattern is more common in these conditions. Conversely, aspiration, hemorrhage, and other infections (i.e., typical bacterial, fungal, or mycobacterial) have a typical focal distribution. Other causes of consolidation in the acute setting are pulmonary oedema and diffuse alveolar damage. These conditions usually have a diffuse distribution; however, GGOs are more typical findings than consolidations in these conditions.
In a chronic setting, the distribution of consolidations is helpful to narrow the differential diagnosis to a few pathological conditions. The most frequent conditions associated to chronic consolidations are OP, chronic eosinophilic pneumonia, sarcoidosis, invasive mucinous carcinoma, lymphoma, and hypersensitivity pneumonitis. Considering that all chronic conditions may present a patchy distribution, invasive mucinous carcinoma has a focal or diffuse presentation, sarcoidosis or OP have a peribronchovascular distribution, while chronic eosinophilic pneumonia or OP can have a peripheral distribution. Lipoid pneumonia is a rare cause of focal, hypodense consolidations (typically < 30 HU). It is the result of aspiration of fat-containing fluids and is often asymptomatic [293,294].
As previously mentioned, the reversed-halo sign is an accessory finding for the diagnosis of OP. Accessory findings for the diagnosis of sarcoidosis are symmetrical, enlarged hilar lymph nodes and the galaxy sign, which is composed of multiple small, confluent nodules close to the margins of a larger consolidation [234].

4.2.4. Decreased Lung Attenuation

For diseases with subpleural cystic spaces (honeycombing and paraseptal emphysema), please refer to the respective section above.
The most recognizable feature with decreased lung attenuation in smoker patients is centrilobular emphysema (CLE). It is characterized by destroyed centrilobular alveolar walls and enlargement of respiratory bronchioles and associated alveoli. It demonstrates highly characteristically centrilobular air-attenuation cystic lucencies, usually smaller than 1 cm, without a visible wall [79].
Conversely, a cyst is defined as any round circumscribed space that is surrounded by an epithelial or fibrous wall of variable thickness [79]. When multiple cysts are discovered in a young smoker patient (age 20–40), consider Langherans’ cell histiocytosis (LCH). LCH symptoms vary widely, from asymptomatic to severe dyspnea; the initial clinical presentation may be with a pneumothorax. The key findings are cystic lesions (usually <10 mm) with a thin or thick wall that may coalesce assuming bizarre and irregular shapes with an upper lobe predominance and sparing of basal costophrenic angles [295].
Other cystic lung diseases are even rarer; however, lymphangioleiomyomatosis (LAM) demonstrates characteristic findings at imaging that allow an easy diagnosis. LAM is a rare multisystemic disorder characterized by the proliferation of abnormal smooth muscle-like cells in the walls of airways, venules, and along the axial lymphatic system, leading to progressive cystic lung destruction. LAM characteristically almost exclusively affects young women of childbearing age (20–40 years); key features are rounded thin-walled cysts (2–60 mm) with uniform shape, and bilateral involvement of the lung from apex to base. A few scattered cysts may be present or there may be near-complete replacement of the lungs without sparing the costophrenic angles. In 50% of cases, the primary manifestation is pneumothorax. Extrathoracic-related findings are present in >70% of cases as retroperitoneal lymphadenopathies, the presence of multiple abdominal angiomyolipomas, and chylous ascites [296]. Similarly, LIP presents with bilateral, thin-walled cysts causing pneumothorax. However, in this last condition, the cysts are fewer in number with perivascular or subpleural distribution, and a history of connective tissue disease or immunosuppression can be present [209].

5. Conclusions

Facing chest pathologies, radiologists must recognize a wide range of different entities, from the mediastinum to pleuro-pulmonary involvement.
Some have typical imaging features leading to an immediate diagnosis; others are very difficult to identify with the sole evaluation of radiologic findings. However, knowledge of basic imaging findings, combined with clinical data, is helpful in most cases.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, A.B. (Alessandra Borgheresi) and V.G.; methodology, A.B. (Alessandra Borgheresi); formal analysis, F.D.M., M.C.B., F.B., P.P. and R.F.; resources, G.D., E.B. and M.G.; writing—original draft preparation, A.B. (Alessandra Borgheresi), L.P., A.B. (Alessandra Bruno) and T.V.; writing—review and editing, A.B. (Alessandra Borgheresi) and A.A.; supervision, A.G., V.M., A.B. (Antonio Barile) and N.G.; project administration, V.G and A.B. (Antonio Barile). All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Elicker, B.M.; Webb, W.R. Fundamental of High-Resolution Lung CT, 2nd ed.; Lippincott Williams & Wilkins: Philadelphia, PA, USA, 2018. [Google Scholar]
  2. Hoop, B.D.; Schaefer-Prokop, C.; Gietema, H.A.; Jong, P.A.D.; Ginneken, B.V.; Klaveren, R.J.V.; Prokop, M. Screening for Lung Cancer with Digital Chest Radiography: Sensitivity and Number of Secondary Work-up CT Examinations. Radiology 2010, 255, 629–637. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Leung, S.C.; Churg, A.M.; Leipsic, J.A.; Levy, R.D.; Wilcox, P.G.; Ryerson, C.J. Unclassifiable Interstitial Lung Disease: An Unresolved Diagnostic Dilemma. Respirol. Case Rep. 2015, 3, 85–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Ghigna, M.R.; de Montpreville, V.T. Mediastinal Tumours and Pseudo-Tumours: A Comprehensive Review with Emphasis on Multidisciplinary Approach. Eur. Respir. Rev. 2021, 30, 200309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Quint, L.E. Imaging of Anterior Mediastinal Masses. Cancer Imaging 2007, 7, S56–S62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Juanpere, S.; Cañete, N.; Ortuño, P.; Martínez, S.; Sanchez, G.; Bernado, L. A Diagnostic Approach to the Mediastinal Masses. Insights Imaging 2013, 4, 29–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Carter, B.W.; Tomiyama, N.; Bhora, F.Y.; de Christenson, M.L.R.; Nakajima, J.; Boiselle, P.M.; Detterbeck, F.C.; Marom, E.M. A Modern Definition of Mediastinal Compartments. J. Thorac. Oncol. 2014, 9, S97–S101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Carter, B.W.; Benveniste, M.F.; Madan, R.; Godoy, M.C.; Groot, P.M.D.; Truong, M.T.; Rosado-De-Christenson, M.L.; Marom, E.M. ITMIG Classification of Mediastinal Compartments and Multidisciplinary Approach to Mediastinal Masses. Radiographics 2017, 37, 413–436. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Whitten, C.R.; Khan, S.; Munneke, G.J.; Grubnic, S. A Diagnostic Approach to Mediastinal Abnormalities. Radiographics 2007, 27, 657–671. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Patnaik, S.; Malempati, A.; Uppin, M.; Susarla, R. Rare Mediastinal Masses—Imaging Review. J. Cancer Res. Ther. 2021, 17, 13–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Franquet, T.; Erasmus, J.J.; Giménez, A.; Rossi, S.; Prats, R. The Retrotracheal Space: Normal Anatomic and Pathologic Appearances. RadioGraphics 2002, 22, S231–S246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Savoca, C.J.; Austin, J.H.M.; Goldberg, H.I. The Right Paratracheal Stripe. Radiology 1977, 122, 295–301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Duwe, B.V.; Sterman, D.H.; Musani, A.I. Tumors of the Mediastinum. Chest 2005, 128, 2893–2909. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Lee, J.Y.; Lee, K.S.; Han, J.; Yoon, H.-K.; Kim, T.S.; Han, B.K.; Kim, J.; Shim, Y.M. Spectrum of Neurogenic Tumors in the Thorax: CT and Pathologic Findings. J. Comput. Assist. Tomogr. 1999, 23, 399–406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Takahashi, K.; Al-Janabi, N.J. Computed Tomography and Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Mediastinal Tumors. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2010, 32, 1325–1339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. McLoud, T.; Boiselle, P. Thoracic Radiology, the Requisites; Mosby: Maryland Heights, MO, USA, 2010. [Google Scholar]
  17. Carter, B.W.; Okumura, M.; Detterbeck, F.C.; Marom, E.M. Approaching the Patient with an Anterior Mediastinal Mass: A Guide for Radiologists. J. Thorac. Oncol. 2014, 9, S110–S118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Park, J.W.; Jeong, W.G.; Lee, J.E.; Lee, H.J.; Ki, S.Y.; Lee, B.C.; Kim, H.O.; Kim, S.K.; Heo, S.H.; Lim, H.S.; et al. Pictorial Review of Mediastinal Masses with an Emphasis on Magnetic Resonance Imaging. Korean J. Radiol. 2021, 22, 139–154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Roden, A.C.; Fang, W.; Shen, Y.; Carter, B.W.; White, D.B.; Jenkins, S.M.; Spears, G.M.; Molina, J.R.; Klang, E.; Segni, M.D.; et al. Distribution of Mediastinal Lesions Across Multi-Institutional, International, Radiology Databases. J. Thorac. Oncol. 2020, 15, 568–579. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Molinari, F.; Bankier, A.A.; Eisenberg, R.L. Fat-Containing Lesions in Adult Thoracic Imaging. Am. J. Roentgenol. 2011, 197, W795–W813. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Schneiter, S.M.; Warrier, R.; Lefkovits, L.; Laurie, C.; O’Brien, P.E.; Taylor, A.J. Effects of Weight Loss on Pericardial Fat and Left Ventricular Mass Assessed with Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Morbid Obesity. Int. J. Clin. Med. 2011, 2, 360–366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  22. Tomiyama, N.; Honda, O.; Tsubamoto, M.; Inoue, A.; Sumikawa, H.; Kuriyama, K.; Kusumoto, M.; Johkoh, T.; Nakamura, H. Anterior Mediastinal Tumors: Diagnostic Accuracy of CT and MRI. Eur. J. Radiol. 2009, 69, 280–288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Hartmann, T. Pearls and Pitfalls in Thoracic Imaging: Variants and Other Difficult Diagnoses, 1st ed.; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 2011. [Google Scholar]
  24. Gaerte, S.C.; Meyer, C.A.; Winer-Muram, H.T.; Tarver, R.D.; Conces, D.J. Fat-Containing Lesions of the Chest. RadioGraphics 2002, 22, S61–S78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Varma, V.; Alabousi, A.; Burute, N.; Haider, E. Thymic Masses and Mimics in Adults: Review of Common and Uncommon Pathologies. Clin. Imaging 2021, 77, 98–110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Nishino, M.; Ashiku, S.K.; Kocher, O.N.; Thurer, R.L.; Boiselle, P.M.; Hatabu, H. The Thymus: A Comprehensive Review. RadioGraphics 2006, 26, 335–348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Munden, R.F.; Nesbitt, J.C.; Kemp, B.L.; Chasen, M.H.; Whitman, G.J. Primary Liposarcoma of the Mediastinum. Am. J. Roentgenol. 2000, 175, 1340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Hahn, H.P.; Fletcher, C.D.M. Primary Mediastinal Liposarcoma. Am. J. Surg. Pathol. 2007, 31, 1868–1874. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Sirmali, M.; Türüt, H.; Gezer, S.; Findik, G.; Kaya, S.; Tastepe, Ý.; Çetin, G. Clinical and Radiologic Evaluation of Foramen of Morgagni Hernias and the Transthoracic Approach. World J. Surg. 2005, 29, 1520–1524. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Choi, Y.W.; McAdams, H.P.; Jeon, S.C.; Hong, E.K.; Kim, Y.-H.; Im, J.-G.; Lee, S.R. Idiopathic Multilocular Thymic Cyst. Am. J. Roentgenol. 2001, 177, 881–885. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Nasseri, F.; Eftekhari, F. Clinical and Radiologic Review of the Normal and Abnormal Thymus: Pearls and Pitfalls. RadioGraphics 2010, 30, 413–428. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Feigin, D.S.; Fenoglio, J.J.; McAllister, H.A.; Madewell, J.E. Pericardial Cysts: A Radiologic-Pathologic Correlation and Review. Radiology 1977, 125, 15–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Jeung, M.-Y.; Gasser, B.; Gangi, A.; Bogorin, A.; Charneau, D.; Wihlm, J.M.; Dietemann, J.-L.; Roy, C. Imaging of Cystic Masses of the Mediastinum. RadioGraphics 2002, 22, S79–S93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Nakazono, T.; Yamaguchi, K.; Egashira, R.; Mizuguchi, M.; Irie, H. Anterior Mediastinal Lesions: CT and MRI Features and Differential Diagnosis. Jpn. J. Radiol. 2021, 39, 101–117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Faul, J.L.; Berry, G.J.; Colby, T.V.; Ruoss, S.J.; Walter, M.B.; Rosen, G.D.; Raffin, T.A. State of the Art Thoracic Lymphangiomas, Lymphangiectasis, Lymphangiomatosis, and Lymphatic Dysplasia Syndrome. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 2000, 161, 1037–1046. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Giron, J.; Fajadet, P.; Sans, N.; Jarlaud, T.; Verhnet, H.; Galy-Fourcade, D.; Baunin, C.; Durand, G.; Sénac, J.P.; Railhac, J.J. Diagnostic Approach to Mediastinal Masses. Eur. J. Radiol. 1998, 27, 21–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Shahrzad, M.; Le, T.S.M.; Silva, M.; Bankier, A.A.; Eisenberg, R.L. Anterior Mediastinal Masses. Am. J. Roentgenol. 2014, 203, W128–W138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Nakazono, T.; Yamaguchi, K.; Egashira, R.; Takase, Y.; Nojiri, J.; Mizuguchi, M.; Irie, H. CT-Based Mediastinal Compartment Classifications and Differential Diagnosis of Mediastinal Tumors. Jpn. J. Radiol. 2019, 37, 117–134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. World Health Organization. Tumours of the Thymus. WHO Classification of Tumours of the Lung, Pleura, Thymus and Heart, 4th ed.; International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC), Ed.; WHO: Geneva, Switzerland, 2015. [Google Scholar]
  40. Benveniste, M.F.K.; Rosado-de-Christenson, M.L.; Sabloff, B.S.; Moran, C.A.; Swisher, S.G.; Marom, E.M. Role of Imaging in the Diagnosis, Staging, and Treatment of Thymoma. RadioGraphics 2011, 31, 1847–1861. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Inoue, A.; Tomiyama, N.; Tatsumi, M.; Ikeda, N.; Okumura, M.; Shiono, H.; Inoue, M.; Higuchi, I.; Aozasa, K.; Johkoh, T.; et al. 18F-FDG PET for the Evaluation of Thymic Epithelial Tumors: Correlation with the World Health Organization Classification in Addition to Dual-Time-Point Imaging. Eur. J. Nucl. Med. Mol. Imaging 2009, 36, 1219–1225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Sadohara, J.; Fujimoto, K.; Müller, N.L.; Kato, S.; Takamori, S.; Ohkuma, K.; Terasaki, H.; Hayabuchi, N. Thymic Epithelial Tumors: Comparison of CT and MR Imaging Findings of Low-Risk Thymomas, High-Risk Thymomas, and Thymic Carcinomas. Eur. J. Radiol. 2006, 60, 70–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Rosado-de-Christenson, M.L.; Strollo, D.C.; Marom, E.M. Imaging of Thymic Epithelial Neoplasms. Hematol./Oncol. Clin. N. Am. 2008, 22, 409–431. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Endo, M.; Nakagawa, K.; Ohde, Y.; Okumura, T.; Kondo, H.; Igawa, S.; Nakamura, Y.; Tsuya, A.; Murakami, H.; Takahashi, T.; et al. Utility of 18FDG-PET for Differentiating the Grade of Malignancy in Thymic Epithelial Tumors. Lung Cancer 2008, 61, 350–355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Strollo, D.C.; Rosado-de-Christenson, M.L. Primary Mediastinal Malignant Germ Cell Neoplasms: Imaging Features. Chest Surg. Clin. N. Am. 2002, 12, 645–658. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Lemarié, E.; Assouline, P.S.; Diot, P.; Regnard, J.F.; Levasseur, P.; Droz, J.P.; Ruffié, P. Primary Mediastinal Germ Cell Tumors. Chest 1992, 102, 1477–1483. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Bokemeyer, C.; Nichols, C.R.; Droz, J.-P.; Schmoll, H.-J.; Horwich, A.; Gerl, A.; Fossa, S.D.; Beyer, J.; Pont, J.; Kanz, L.; et al. Extragonadal Germ Cell Tumors of the Mediastinum and Retroperitoneum: Results from an International Analysis. J. Clin. Oncol. 2002, 20, 1864–1873. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Bukowski, R.M.; Wolf, M.; Kulander, B.G.; Montie, J.; Crawford, E.D.; Blumenstein, B. Alternating Combination Chemotherapy in Patients with Extragonadal Germ Cell Tumors a Southwest Oncology Group Study. Cancer 1993, 71, 2631–2638. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Rosado-de-Christenson, M.L.; Templeton, P.A.; Moran, C.A. From the Archives of the AFIP. Mediastinal Germ Cell Tumors: Radiologic and Pathologic Correlation. RadioGraphics 1992, 12, 1013–1030. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Tian, L.; Liu, L.Z.; Cui, C.Y.; Zhang, W.D.; Kuang, Y.L. CT Findings of Primary Non-Teratomatous Germ Cell Tumors of the Mediastinum—A Report of 15 Cases. Eur. J. Radiol. 2012, 81, 1057–1061. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Fizazi, K.; Culine, S.; Droz, J.P.; Kramar, A.; Théodore, C.; Ruffié, P.; Chevalier, T.L. Primary Mediastinal Nonseminomatous Germ Cell Tumors: Results of Modern Therapy Including Cisplatin-Based Chemotherapy. J. Clin. Oncol. 1998, 16, 725–732. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Kesler, K.A.; Rieger, K.M.; Ganjoo, K.N.; Sharma, M.; Fineberg, N.S.; Einhorn, L.H.; Brown, J.W. Primary Mediastinal Nonseminomatous Germ Cell Tumors: The Influence of Postchemotherapy Pathology on Long-Term Survival after Surgery. J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg. 1999, 118, 692–701. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  53. Kissin, C.M.; Husband, J.E.; Nicholas, D.; Eversman, W. Benign Thymic Enlargement in Adults after Chemotherapy: CT Demonstration. Radiology 1987, 163, 67–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Shetty, A.S.; Sipe, A.L.; Zulfiqar, M.; Tsai, R.; Raptis, D.A.; Raptis, C.A.; Bhalla, S. In-Phase and Opposed-Phase Imaging: Applications of Chemical Shift and Magnetic Susceptibility in the Chest and Abdomen. RadioGraphics 2019, 39, 115–135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Inaoka, T.; Takahashi, K.; Mineta, M.; Yamada, T.; Shuke, N.; Okizaki, A.; Nagasawa, K.; Sugimori, H.; Aburano, T. Thymic Hyperplasia and Thymus Gland Tumors: Differentiation with Chemical Shift MR Imaging. Radiology 2007, 243, 869–876. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  56. McAdams, H.P.; Kirejczyk, W.M. Bronchogenic Cyst: Imaging Features with Clinical and Histopathologic Correlation. Radiology 2000, 217, 441–446. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Ferguson, C.C.; Young, L.N.; Sutherland, J.B.; Macpherson, R.I. Intrathoracic Gastrogenic Cyst-Preoperative Diagnosis by Technetium Pertechnetate Scan. J. Pediatr. Surg. 1973, 8, 827–828. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Balcombe, J.; Torigian, D.A.; Kim, W.; Miller, W.T. Cross-Sectional Imaging of Paragangliomas of the Aortic Body and Other Thoracic Branchiomeric Paraganglia. Am. J. Roentgenol. 2007, 188, 1054–1058. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Brown, M.L.; Zayas, G.E.; Abel, M.D.; Young, W.F.; Schaff, H.V. Mediastinal Paragangliomas: The Mayo Clinic Experience. Ann. Thorac. Surg. 2008, 86, 946–951. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Motwani, M.; Kidambi, A.; Herzog, B.A.; Uddin, A.; Greenwood, J.P.; Plein, S. MR Imaging of Cardiac Tumors and Masses: A Review of Methods and Clinical Applications. Radiology 2013, 268, 26–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  61. Miles, J.; Pennybacker, J.; Sheldon, P. Intrathoracic Meningocele. Its Development and Association with Neurofibromatosis. J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry 1969, 32, 99–110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  62. Glazer, H.; Siegel, M.; Sagel, S. Low-Attenuation Mediastinal Masses on CT. Am. J. Roentgenol. 1989, 152, 1173–1177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Kirchner, S.G.; Heller, R.M.; Smith, C.W. Pancreatic Pseudocyst of the Mediastinum. Radiology 1977, 123, 37–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Kawashima, A.; Fishman, E.K.; Kuhlman, J.E.; Nixon, M.S. CT of Posterior Mediastinal Masses. Radiographics 1991, 11, 1045–1067. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  65. Strollo, D.C.; Rosado-de-Christenson, L.M.L.; Jett, J.R. Primary Mediastinal Tumors. Chest 1997, 112, 1344–1357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  66. Bhargava, R.; Parham, D.M.; Lasater, O.E.; Chari, R.S.; Chen, G.; Fletcher, B.D. MR Imaging Differentiation of Benign and Malignant Peripheral Nerve Sheath Tumors: Use of the Target Sign. Pediatr. Radiol. 1997, 27, 124–129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Murphey, M.D.; Smith, W.S.; Smith, S.E.; Kransdorf, M.J.; Temple, H.T. From the Archives of the AFIP. Imaging of Musculoskeletal Neurogenic Tumors: Radiologic-Pathologic Correlation. Radiographics 1999, 19, 1253–1280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  68. Bredella, M.A.; Torriani, M.; Hornicek, F.; Ouellette, H.A.; Plamer, W.E.; Williams, Z.; Fischman, A.J.; Plotkin, S.R. Value of PET in the Assessment of Patients with Neurofibromatosis Type 1. Am. J. Roentgenol. 2007, 189, 928–935. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Warbey, V.S.; Ferner, R.E.; Dunn, J.T.; Calonje, E.; O’Doherty, M.J. [18F]FDG PET/CT in the Diagnosis of Malignant Peripheral Nerve Sheath Tumours in Neurofibromatosis Type-1. Eur. J. Nucl. Med. Mol. Imaging 2009, 36, 751–757. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Berkmen, Y.M.; Zalta, B.A. Case 126: Extramedullary Hematopoiesis. Radiology 2007, 245, 905–908. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Georgiades, C.S.; Neyman, E.G.; Francis, I.R.; Sneider, M.B.; Fishman, E.K. Typical and Atypical Presentations of Extramedullary Hemopoiesis. Am. J. Roentgenol. 2002, 179, 1239–1243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Georgakopoulou, V.E.; Damaskos, C.; Mantzouranis, K.; Melemeni, D.; Gkoufa, A.; Chlapoutakis, S.; Garmpis, N.; Sklapani, P.; Aravantinou, A.; Garmpi, A.; et al. Invasive Methods for the Diagnosis and Management of Intrathoracic Extramedullary Hematopoiesis: A Literature Review. Respir. Med. Res. 2021, 79, 100815. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Yang, M.; Covington, M.F.; Nguyen, B.D.; Johnson, G.B.; Mesa, R.A.; Roarke, M.C. 99mTc-Sulfur Colloid Bone Marrow Scintigraphy in Diagnosis of Diffuse Pulmonary Extramedullary Hematopoiesis Secondary to Myelofibrosis. J. Nucl. Med. Technol. 2018, 46, 368–372. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  74. Yang, M.; Roarke, M. Diffuse Pulmonary Extramedullary Hematopoiesis in Myelofibrosis Diagnosed with Technetium-99m Sulfur Colloid Bone Marrow Scintigraphy and Single Photon Emission Computerized Tomography/CT. Am. J. Hematol. 2017, 92, 323–324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  75. Iyer, H.; Anand, A.; Sryma, P.; Gupta, K.; Naranje, P.; Damle, N.; Mittal, S.; Madan, N.K.; Mohan, A.; Hadda, V.; et al. Mediastinal Lymphadenopathy: A Practical Approach. Expert Rev. Respir. Med. 2021, 15, 1317–1334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Rusch, V.W.; Asamura, H.; Watanabe, H.; Giroux, D.J.; Rami-Porta, R.; Goldstraw, P. The IASLC Lung Cancer Staging Project: A Proposal for a New International Lymph Node Map in the Forthcoming Seventh Edition of the TNM Classification for Lung Cancer. J. Thorac. Oncol. 2009, 4, 568–577. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  77. Suwatanapongched, T.; Gierada, D.S. CT of Thoracic Lymph Nodes. Part I: Anatomy and Drainage. Br. J. Radiol. 2006, 79, 922–928. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Suwatanapongched, T.; Gierada, D.S. CT of Thoracic Lymph Nodes. Part II: Diseases and Pitfalls. Br. J. Radiol. 2006, 79, 999–1000. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  79. Hansell, D.M.; Bankier, A.A.; MacMahon, H.; McLoud, T.C.; Müller, N.L.; Remy, J. Fleischner Society: Glossary of Terms for Thoracic Imaging. Radiology 2008, 246, 697–722. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  80. Martini, N.; Heelan, R.; Westcott, J.; Bains, M.S.; McCormack, P.; Caravelli, J.; Watson, R.; Zaman, M. Comparative Merits of Conventional, Computed Tomographic, and Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Assessing Mediastinal Involvement in Surgically Confirmed Lung Carcinoma. J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg. 1985, 90, 639–648. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Glazer, G.; Gross, B.; Quint, L.; Francis, I.; Bookstein, F.; Orringer, M. Normal Mediastinal Lymph Nodes: Number and Size According to American Thoracic Society Mapping. Am. J. Roentgenol. 1985, 144, 261–265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Remy-Jardin, M.; Duyck, P.; Remy, J.; Petyt, L.; Wurtz, A.; Mensier, E.; Copin, M.C.; Riquet, M. Hilar Lymph Nodes: Identification with Spiral CT and Histologic Correlation. Radiology 1995, 196, 387–394. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Tirumani, S.H.; Ramaiya, N.H.; Keraliya, A.; Bailey, N.D.; Ott, P.A.; Hodi, F.S.; Nishino, M. Radiographic Profiling of Immune-Related Adverse Events in Advanced Melanoma Patients Treated with Ipilimumab. Cancer Immunol. 2015, 3, 1185–1192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  84. Gkiozos, I.; Kopitopoulou, A.; Kalkanis, A.; Vamvakaris, I.N.; Judson, M.A.; Syrigos, K.N. Sarcoidosis-Like Reactions Induced by Checkpoint Inhibitors. J. Thorac. Oncol. 2018, 13, 1076–1082. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  85. Wang, X.; Wang, W.; Vega, F.; Quesada, A.E. Aggressive Mediastinal Lymphomas. Semin. Diagn. Pathol. 2021; in press. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Criado, E.; Sánchez, M.; Ramírez, J.; Arguis, P.; de Caralt, T.M.; Perea, R.J.; Xaubet, A. Pulmonary Sarcoidosis: Typical and Atypical Manifestations at High-Resolution CT with Pathologic Correlation1. Radiographics 2010, 30, 1567–1586. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  87. Wynants, J.; Stroobants, S.; Dooms, C.; Vansteenkiste, J. Staging of Lung Cancer. Radiol. Clin. N. Am. 2007, 45, 609–625. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Mennini, M.L.; Catalano, C.; Monte, M.D.; Fraioli, F. Computed Tomography and Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Thoracic Lymphatic System. Thorac. Surg. Clin. 2012, 22, 155–160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Bhalla, A.; Goyal, A.; Guleria, R.; Gupta, A. Chest Tuberculosis: Radiological Review and Imaging Recommendations. Indian J. Radiol. Imaging 2015, 25, 213–225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Harisinghani, M.G.; McLoud, T.C.; Shepard, J.-A.O.; Ko, J.P.; Shroff, M.M.; Mueller, P.R. Tuberculosis from Head to Toe1. Radiographics 2000, 20, 449–470. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  91. Ganeshan, D.; Menias, C.O.; Lubner, M.G.; Pickhardt, P.J.; Sandrasegaran, K.; Bhalla, S. Sarcoidosis from Head to Toe: What the Radiologist Needs to Know. Radiographics 2018, 38, 1180–1200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Begin, R.; Bergeron, D.; Samson, L.; Boctor, M.; Cantin, A. CT Assessment of Silicosis in Exposed Workers. Am. J. Roentgenol. 1987, 148, 509–514. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  93. Homer, M.J.; Wechsler, R.J.; Carter, B.L. Mediastinal Lipomatosis. Radiology 1978, 128, 657–661. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Beaudoin, S.; Gonzalez, A.V. Evaluation of the Patient with Pleural effusion. CMAJ 2018, 190, E291–E295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  95. Helm, E.J.; Matin, T.N.; Gleeson, F.V. Imaging of the Pleura. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2010, 32, 1275–1286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Tran, J.; Haussner, W.; Shah, K. Traumatic Pneumothorax: A Review of Current Diagnostic Practices and Evolving Management. J. Emerg. Med. 2021, 61, 517–528. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Sureka, B.; Thukral, B.B.; Mittal, M.K.; Mittal, A.; Sinha, M. Radiological Review of Pleural Tumors. Indian J. Radiol. Imaging 2013, 23, 313–320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Walker, C.M.; Takasugi, J.E.; Chung, J.H.; Reddy, G.P.; Done, S.L.; Pipavath, S.N.; Schmidt, R.A.; Godwin, J.D. Tumorlike Conditions of the Pleura. Radiographics 2012, 32, 971–985. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Downer, N.J.; Ali, N.J.; Au-Yong, I.T.H. Investigating Pleural Thickening. BMJ 2013, 346, e8376. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  100. Bonomo, L.; Feragalli, B.; Sacco, R.; Merlino, B.; Storto, M.L. Malignant Pleural Disease. Eur. J. Radiol. 2000, 34, 98–118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  101. Bibby, A.C.; Tsim, S.; Kanellakis, N.; Ball, H.; Talbot, D.C.; Blyth, K.G.; Maskell, N.A.; Psallidas, I. Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma: An Update on Investigation, Diagnosis and Treatment. Eur. Respir. Rev. 2016, 25, 472–486. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  102. Luerken, L.; Thurn, P.L.; Zeman, F.; Stroszczynski, C.; Hamer, O.W. Conspicuity of Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma in Contrast Enhanced MDCT—Arterial Phase or Late Phase? BMC Cancer 2021, 21, 1144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Alfudhili, K.M.; Lynch, D.A.; Laurent, F.; Ferretti, G.R.; Dunet, V.; Beigelman-Aubry, C. Focal Pleural Thickening Mimicking Pleural Plaques on Chest Computed Tomography: Tips and Tricks. Br. J. Radiol. 2016, 89, 20150792. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  104. Claude-Desroches, M.; Bierry, G.; Touitou-Gottenberg, D.; Golmard, J.-L.; Grenier, P.A.; Beigelman-Aubry, C. Focal Dependent Pleural Thickening at MDCT: Pleural Lesion or Functional Abnormality? Diagn. Interv. Imaging 2012, 93, 360–364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  105. Nickell, L.T.; Lichtenberger, J.P.; Khorashadi, L.; Abbott, G.F.; Carter, B.W. Multimodality Imaging for Characterization, Classification, and Staging of Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma. Radiographics 2014, 34, 1692–1706. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  106. Metintas, M.; Ucgun, I.; Elbek, O.; Erginel, S.; Metintas, S.; Kolsuz, M.; Harmanci, E.; Alatas, F.; Hillerdal, G.; Ozkan, R.; et al. Computed Tomography Features in Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma and Other Commonly Seen Pleural Diseases. Eur. J. Radiol. 2002, 41, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  107. Yamamuro, M.; Gerbaudo, V.H.; Gill, R.R.; Jacobson, F.L.; Sugarbaker, D.J.; Hatabu, H. Morphologic and Functional Imaging of Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma. Eur. J. Radiol. 2007, 64, 356–366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Kim, Y.K.; Kim, J.S.; Lee, K.W.; Yi, C.A.; Koo, J.M.; Jung, S.H. Multidetector CT Findings and Differential Diagnoses of Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma and Metastatic Pleural Diseases in Korea. Korean J. Radiol. 2016, 17, 545–553. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  109. Robinson, B.W.S.; Lake, R.A. Advances in Malignant Mesothelioma. N. Engl. J. Med. 2005, 353, 1591–1603. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  110. Qureshi, N.R.; Gleeson, F.V. Imaging of Pleural Disease. Clin. Chest Med. 2006, 27, 193–213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Cardillo, G.; Facciolo, F.; Cavazzana, A.O.; Capece, G.; Gasparri, R.; Martelli, M. Localized (Solitary) Fibrous Tumors of the Pleura: An Analysis of 55 Patients. Ann. Thorac. Surg. 2000, 70, 1808–1812. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Rosado-de-Christenson, M.L.; Abbott, G.F.; McAdams, H.P.; Franks, T.J.; Galvin, J.R. From the Archives of the AFIP. Localized Fibrous Tumors of the Pleura1. RadioGraphics 2003, 23, 759–783. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  113. Delgado, D.; Ramírez, O.; Sultan, N.; Miranda, P.; Delgado, A. Pleural Plaques by Inhalation of Asbestos Fibers. Rev. Bras. Med. Trab. 2020, 18, 241–245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  114. Lennartz, S.; Blanc, M.L.; Zopfs, D.; Hokamp, N.G.; Abdullayev, N.; Laukamp, K.R.; Haneder, S.; Borggrefe, J.; Maintz, D.; Persigehl, T. Dual-Energy CT-Derived Iodine Maps: Use in Assessing Pleural Carcinomatosis. Radiology 2019, 290, 796–804. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  115. Jaramillo, F.A.; Gutierrez, F.; Bhalla, S. Pleural Tumours and Tumour-like Lesions. Clin. Radiol. 2018, 73, 1014–1024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  116. Rousset, P.; Rousset-Jablonski, C.; Alifano, M.; Mansuet-Lupo, A.; Buy, J.N.; Revel, M.P. Thoracic Endometriosis Syndrome: CT and MRI Features. Clin. Radiol. 2014, 69, 323–330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  117. Arnaud, L.; Pierre, I.; Beigelman-Aubry, C.; Capron, F.; Brun, A.L.; Rigolet, A.; Girerd, X.; Weber, N.; Piette, J.C.; Grenier, P.A.; et al. Pulmonary Involvement in Erdheim-Chester Disease: A Single-Center Study of Thirty-Four Patients and a Review of the Literature. Arthritis Rheum. 2010, 62, 3504–3512. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Martínez-de-Alegría, A.; Baleato-González, S.; García-Figueiras, R.; Bermúdez-Naveira, A.; Abdulkader-Nallib, I.; Díaz-Peromingo, J.A.; Villalba-Martín, C. IgG4-Related Disease from Head to Toe. Radiographics 2015, 35, 2007–2025. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  119. Hirano, K.; Kawabe, T.; Komatsu, Y.; Matsubara, S.; Togawa, O.; Arizumi, T.; Yamamoto, N.; Nakai, Y.; Sasahira, N.; Tsujino, T.; et al. High-rate Pulmonary Involvement in Autoimmune Pancreatitis. Intern. Med. J. 2006, 36, 58–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  120. Zen, Y.; Inoue, D.; Kitao, A.; Onodera, M.; Abo, H.; Miyayama, S.; Gabata, T.; Matsui, O.; Nakanuma, Y. IgG4-Related Lung and Pleural Disease: A Clinicopathologic Study of 21 Cases. Am. J. Surg. Pathol. 2009, 33, 1886–1893. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. Inoue, D.; Zen, Y.; Abo, H.; Gabata, T.; Demachi, H.; Kobayashi, T.; Yoshikawa, J.; Miyayama, S.; Yasui, M.; Nakanuma, Y.; et al. Immunoglobulin G4–Related Lung Disease: CT Findings with Pathologic Correlations. Radiology 2009, 251, 260–270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  122. Murray, J.F.; Schraufnagel, D.E.; Hopewell, P.C. Treatment of Tuberculosis. A Historical Perspective. Ann. Am. Thorac. Soc. 2015, 12, 1749–1759. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  123. Eagle, K.; Mond, D.J.; Khan, A. Lucite-Ball Plombage. N. Engl. J. Med. 1994, 330, 1723. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  124. Koratala, A.; Bhatti, V. Incidental Finding of Oleothorax. N. Engl. J. Med. 2017, 376, e21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  125. Ledda, R.E.; Silva, M.; McMichael, N.; Sartorio, C.; Branchi, C.; Milanese, G.; Nayak, S.M.; Sverzellati, N. The Diagnostic Value of Grey-Scale Inversion Technique in Chest Radiography. Radiol. Med. 2022, 127, 294–304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  126. Fletcher, J.G.; Levin, D.L.; Sykes, A.-M.G.; Lindell, R.M.; White, D.B.; Kuzo, R.S.; Suresh, V.; Yu, L.; Leng, S.; Holmes, D.R.; et al. Observer Performance for Detection of Pulmonary Nodules at Chest CT over a Large Range of Radiation Dose Levels. Radiology 2020, 297, 699–707. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  127. Agostini, A.; Borgheresi, A.; Carotti, M.; Ottaviani, L.; Badaloni, M.; Floridi, C.; Giovagnoni, A. Third-Generation Iterative Reconstruction on a Dual-Source, High-Pitch, Low-Dose Chest CT Protocol with Tin Filter for Spectral Shaping at 100 KV: A Study on a Small Series of COVID-19 Patients. Radiol. Med. 2021, 126, 388–398. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  128. Rawashdeh, M.A.; Saade, C. Radiation Dose Reduction Considerations and Imaging Patterns of Ground Glass Opacities in Coronavirus: Risk of over Exposure in Computed Tomography. Radiol. Med. 2021, 126, 380–387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  129. Tagliati, C.; Lanza, C.; Pieroni, G.; Amici, L.; Carotti, M.; Giuseppetti, G.M.; Giovagnoni, A. Ultra-Low-Dose Chest CT in Adult Patients with Cystic Fibrosis Using a Third-Generation Dual-Source CT Scanner. Radiol. Med. 2021, 126, 544–552. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  130. Shaw, B.; Daskareh, M.; Gholamrezanezhad, A. The Lingering Manifestations of COVID-19 during and after Convalescence: Update on Long-Term Pulmonary Consequences of Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19). Radiol. Med. 2021, 126, 40–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  131. Silva, M.; Picozzi, G.; Sverzellati, N.; Anglesio, S.; Bartolucci, M.; Cavigli, E.; Deliperi, A.; Falchini, M.; Falaschi, F.; Ghio, D.; et al. Low-Dose CT for Lung Cancer Screening: Position Paper from the Italian College of Thoracic Radiology. Radiol. Med. 2022, 127, 543–559. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  132. Peerlings, J.; Troost, E.G.C.; Nelemans, P.J.; Cobben, D.C.P.; Boer, J.C.J.D.; Hoffmann, A.L.; Beets-Tan, R.G.H. The Diagnostic Value of MR Imaging in Determining the Lymph Node Status of Patients with Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Meta-Analysis. Radiology 2016, 281, 86–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  133. Scialpi, M.; Moschini, T.O.; Filippis, G.D. PET/Contrast-Enhanced CT in Oncology: “To Do, or Not to Do, That Is the Question”. Radiol. Med. 2022, 127, 925–927. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  134. Sakai, H.; Takeda, M. Percutaneous Transthoracic Needle Biopsy of the Lung in the Era of Precision Medicine. J. Thorac. Dis. 2019, 11, S1213–S1215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  135. Sabatino, V.; Russo, U.; D’Amuri, F.; Bevilacqua, A.; Pagnini, F.; Milanese, G.; Gentili, F.; Nizzoli, R.; Tiseo, M.; Pedrazzi, G.; et al. Pneumothorax and Pulmonary Hemorrhage after CT-Guided Lung Biopsy: Incidence, Clinical Significance and Correlation. Radiol. Med. 2021, 126, 170–177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  136. Loverdos, K.; Fotiadis, A.; Kontogianni, C.; Iliopoulou, M.; Gaga, M. Lung Nodules: A Comprehensive Review on Current Approach and Management. Ann. Thorac. Med. 2019, 14, 226–238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  137. Gohagan, J.; Marcus, P.; Fagerstrom, R.; Pinsky, P.; Kramer, B.; Prorok, P. Baseline Findings of a Randomized Feasibility Trial of Lung Cancer Screening With Spiral CT Scan vs Chest Radiograph. Chest 2004, 126, 114–121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  138. Swensen, S.J.; Jett, J.R.; Hartman, T.E.; Midthun, D.E.; Sloan, J.A.; Sykes, A.-M.; Aughenbaugh, G.L.; Clemens, M.A. Lung Cancer Screening with CT: Mayo Clinic Experience. Radiology 2003, 226, 756–761. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  139. MacMahon, H.; Naidich, D.P.; Goo, J.M.; Lee, K.S.; Leung, A.N.C.; Mayo, J.R.; Mehta, A.C.; Ohno, Y.; Powell, C.A.; Prokop, M.; et al. Guidelines for Management of Incidental Pulmonary Nodules Detected on CT Images: From the Fleischner Society 2017. Radiology 2017, 284, 228–243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  140. de Hoop, B.; van Ginneken, B.; Gietema, H.; Prokop, M. Pulmonary Perifissural Nodules on CT Scans: Rapid Growth Is Not a Predictor of Malignancy. Radiology 2012, 265, 611–616. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  141. Chung, K.; Jacobs, C.; Scholten, E.T.; Goo, J.M.; Prosch, H.; Sverzellati, N.; Ciompi, F.; Mets, O.M.; Gerke, P.K.; Prokop, M.; et al. Lung-RADS Category 4X: Does It Improve Prediction of Malignancy in Subsolid Nodules? Radiology 2017, 284, 264–271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  142. Erasmus, J.J.; Connolly, J.E.; McAdams, H.P.; Roggli, V.L. Solitary Pulmonary Nodules: Part I. Morphologic Evaluation for Differentiation of Benign and Malignant Lesions. RadioGraphics 2000, 20, 43–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  143. Li, J.; Xia, T.; Yang, X.; Dong, X.; Liang, J.; Zhong, N.; Guan, Y. Malignant Solitary Pulmonary Nodules: Assessment of Mass Growth Rate and Doubling Time at Follow-up CT. J. Thorac. Dis. 2018, 10, S797–S806. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  144. Khan, A.N.; Al-Jahdali, H.H.; Allen, C.M.; Irion, K.L.; Ghanem, S.A.; Koteyar, S.S. The Calcified Lung Nodule: What Does It Mean. Ann. Thorac. Med. 2010, 5, 67–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  145. Devaraj, A.; van Ginneken, B.; Nair, A.; Baldwin, D. Use of Volumetry for Lung Nodule Management: Theory and Practice. Radiology 2017, 284, 630–644. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  146. Hasegawa, M.; Sone, S.; Takashima, S.; Li, F.; Yang, Z.G.; Maruyama, Y.; Watanabe, T. Growth Rate of Small Lung Cancers Detected on Mass CT Screening. Br. J. Radiol. 2000, 73, 1252–1259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  147. Yankelevitz, D.F.; Yip, R.; Smith, J.P.; Liang, M.; Liu, Y.; Xu, D.M.; Salvatore, M.M.; Wolf, A.S.; Flores, R.M.; Henschke, C.I.; et al. CT Screening for Lung Cancer: Nonsolid Nodules in Baseline and Annual Repeat Rounds. Radiology 2015, 277, 555–564. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  148. Kobayashi, Y.; Mitsudomi, T. Management of Ground-Glass Opacities: Should All Pulmonary Lesions with Ground-Glass Opacity Be Surgically Resected? Transl. Lung Cancer Res. 2013, 2, 354–363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  149. Seo, J.B.; Im, J.-G.; Goo, J.M.; Chung, M.J.; Kim, M.-Y. Atypical Pulmonary Metastases: Spectrum of Radiologic Findings1. Radiographics 2001, 21, 403–417. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  150. American College of Radiology Lung CT Screening Reporting & Data System (Lung-RADS®). Available online: https://www.acr.org/Clinical-Resources/Reporting-and-Data-Systems/Lung-Rads (accessed on 2 June 2023).
  151. American College of Radiology Lung-RADS V2022 Assessment Categories. Available online: https://www.acr.org/-/media/ACR/Files/RADS/Lung-RADS/Lung-RADS-2022.pdf (accessed on 2 June 2023).
  152. Yip, R.; Yankelevitz, D.F.; Hu, M.; Li, K.; Xu, D.M.; Jirapatnakul, A.; Henschke, C.I. Lung Cancer Deaths in the National Lung Screening Trial Attributed to Nonsolid Nodules. Radiology 2016, 281, 589–596. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  153. Henschke, C.I.; Lee, I.J.; Wu, N.; Farooqi, A.; Khan, A.; Yankelevitz, D.; Altorki, N.K. CT Screening for Lung Cancer: Prevalence and Incidence of Mediastinal Masses. Radiology 2006, 239, 586–590. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  154. Pinto, P.S. The CT Halo Sign. Radiology 2004, 230, 109–110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  155. Lee, H.J.; Goo, J.M.; Lee, C.H.; Park, C.M.; Kim, K.G.; Park, E.A.; Lee, H.Y. Predictive CT Findings of Malignancy in Ground-Glass Nodules on Thin-Section Chest CT: The Effects on Radiologist Performance. Eur. Radiol. 2009, 19, 552–560. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  156. Travis, W.D.; Brambilla, E.; Nicholson, A.G.; Yatabe, Y.; Austin, J.H.M.; Beasley, M.B.; Chirieac, L.R.; Dacic, S.; Duhig, E.; Flieder, D.B.; et al. The 2015 World Health Organization Classification of Lung Tumors. J. Thorac. Oncol. 2015, 10, 1243–1260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  157. Oh, J.Y.; Kwon, S.Y.; Yoon, H.I.; Lee, S.M.; Yim, J.J.; Lee, J.H.; Yoo, C.G.; Kim, Y.W.; Han, S.K.; Shim, Y.S.; et al. Clinical Significance of a Solitary Ground-Glass Opacity (GGO) Lesion of the Lung Detected by Chest CT. Lung Cancer 2007, 55, 67–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  158. Kim, H.; Park, C.M.; Koh, J.M.; Lee, S.M.; Goo, J.M. Pulmonary Subsolid Nodules: What Radiologists Need to Know about the Imaging Features and Management Strategy. Diagn. Interv. Radiol. 2014, 20, 47–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  159. Oda, S.; Awai, K.; Murao, K.; Ozawa, A.; Utsunomiya, D.; Yanaga, Y.; Kawanaka, K.; Yamashita, Y. Volume-Doubling Time of Pulmonary Nodules with Ground Glass Opacity at Multidetector CT. Assessment with Computer-Aided Three-Dimensional Volumetry. Acad. Radiol. 2011, 18, 63–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  160. Hoop, B.D.; Gietema, H.; Vorst, S.V.D.; Murphy, K.; Klaveren, R.J.V.; Prokop, M. Pulmonary Ground-Glass Nodules: Increase in Mass as an Early Indicator of Growth. Radiology 2010, 255, 199–206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  161. Godoy, M.C.B.; Naidich, D.P. Subsolid Pulmonary Nodules and the Spectrum of Peripheral Adenocarcinomas of the Lung: Recommended Interim Guidelines for Assessment and Management. Radiology 2009, 253, 606–622. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  162. Marchiori, E.; Zanetti, G.; Meirelles, G.S.P.; Escuissato, D.L.; Souza, A.S.; Hochhegger, B. The Reversed Halo Sign on High-Resolution CT in Infectious and Noninfectious Pulmonary Diseases. Am. J. Roentgenol. 2011, 197, W69–W75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  163. Li, F.; Sone, S.; Abe, H.; MacMahon, H.; Doi, K. Malignant versus Benign Nodules at CT Screening for Lung Cancer: Comparison of Thin-Section CT Findings. Radiology 2004, 233, 793–798. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  164. Edey, A.J.; Hansell, D.M. Incidentally Detected Small Pulmonary Nodules on CT. Clin. Radiol. 2009, 64, 872–884. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  165. Ahn, M.I.; Gleeson, T.G.; Chan, I.H.; McWilliams, A.M.; MacDonald, S.L.; Lam, S.; Atkar-Khattra, S.; Mayo, J.R. Perifissural Nodules Seen at CT Screening for Lung Cancer. Radiology 2010, 254, 949–956. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  166. Revel, M.-P. Avoiding Overdiagnosis in Lung Cancer Screening: The Volume Doubling Time Strategy. Eur. Respir. J. 2013, 42, 1459–1463. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  167. Takashima, S.; Sone, S.; Li, F.; Maruyama, Y.; Hasegawa, M.; Matsushita, T.; Takayama, F.; Kadoya, M. Small Solitary Pulmonary Nodules (≤1 cm) Detected at Population-Based CT Screening for Lung Cancer: Reliable High-Resolution CT Features of Benign Lesions. Am. J. Roentgenol. 2003, 180, 955–964. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  168. Serafin, Z. Rounded Atelectasis of the Lung: A Pictorial Review. Pol. J. Radiol. 2014, 79, 203–209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  169. Doyle, T.; Lawler, G. CT Features of Rounded Atelectasis of the Lung. Am. J. Roentgenol. 1984, 143, 225–228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  170. Yudin, A. Rounded Atelectasis, Comet-Tail Sign, and Crow’s Foot Sign. In Metaphorical Signs in Computed Tomography of Chest and Abdomen; Springer International Publishing: Cham, Switzerland, 2014; p. 45. [Google Scholar]
  171. Partap, V.A. The Comet Tail Sign. Radiology 1999, 213, 553–554. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  172. Siegelman, S.S.; Khouri, N.F.; Scott, W.W.; Leo, F.P.; Hamper, U.M.; Fishman, E.K.; Zerhouni, E.A. Pulmonary Hamartoma: CT Findings. Radiology 1986, 160, 313–317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  173. Winer-Muram, H.T. The Solitary Pulmonary Nodule. Radiology 2006, 239, 34–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  174. Seemann, M.D.; Staebler, A.; Beinert, T.; Dienemann, H.; Obst, B.; Matzko, M.; Pistitsch, C.; Reiser, M.F. Usefulness of Morphological Characteristics for the Differentiation of Benign from Malignant Solitary Pulmonary Lesions Using HRCT. Eur. Radiol. 1999, 9, 409–417. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  175. Lee, S.M.; Park, C.M.; Goo, J.M.; Lee, H.-J.; Wi, J.Y.; Kang, C.H. Invasive Pulmonary Adenocarcinomas versus Preinvasive Lesions Appearing as Ground-Glass Nodules: Differentiation by Using CT Features. Radiology 2013, 268, 265–273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  176. Hsu, J.-S.; Han, I.-T.; Tsai, T.-H.; Lin, S.-F.; Jaw, T.-S.; Liu, G.-C.; Chou, S.-H.; Chong, I.-W.; Chen, C.-Y. Pleural Tags on CT Scans to Predict Visceral Pleural Invasion of Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer That Does Not Abut the Pleura. Radiology 2016, 279, 590–596. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  177. Harders, S.W.; Madsen, H.H.; Rasmussen, T.R.; Hager, H.; Rasmussen, F. High Resolution Spiral CT for Determining the Malignant Potential of Solitary Pulmonary Nodules: Refining and Testing the Test. Acta Radiol. 2011, 52, 401–409. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  178. Hochhegger, B.; Nin, C.S.; Alves, G.R.T.; Hochhegger, D.R.; Souza, V.V.S.D.; Watte, G.; Irion, K.L.; Guimarães, M.D.; Marchiori, E. Multidetector Computed Tomography Findings in Pulmonary Hamartomas a New Fat Detection Threshold. J. Thorac. Imaging 2016, 31, 11–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  179. Hochhegger, B.; Marchiori, E.; Reis, D.Q.D.; Souza, A.S.; Souza, L.S.; Brum, T.; Irion, K.L. Chemical-Shift MRI of Pulmonary Hamartomas: Initial Experience Using a Modified Technique to Assess Nodule Fat. Am. J. Roentgenol. 2012, 199, W331–W334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  180. Grewal, R.G.; Austin, J.H.M. CT Demonstration of Calcification in Carcinoma of the Lung. J. Comput. Assist. Tomogr. 1994, 18, 867–871. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  181. Diederich, S.; Wormanns, D.; Semik, M.; Thomas, M.; Lenzen, H.; Roos, N.; Heindel, W. Screening for Early Lung Cancer with Low-Dose Spiral CT: Prevalence in 817 Asymptomatic Smokers. Radiology 2002, 222, 773–781. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  182. Mahoney, M.C.; Shipley, R.T.; Corcoran, H.L.; Dickson, B.A. CT Demonstration of Calcification in Carcinoma of the Lung. Am. J. Roentgenol. 1990, 154, 255–258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  183. Gurney, J.W. Determining the Likelihood of Malignancy in Solitary Pulmonary Nodules with Bayesian Analysis. Part I. Theory. Radiology 1993, 186, 405–413. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  184. Thalinger, A.R.; Rosenthal, S.N.; Borg, S.; Arseneau, J.C. Cavitation of Pulmonary Metastases as a Response to Chemotherapy. Cancer 1980, 46, 1329–1332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  185. Truong, M.T.; Ko, J.P.; Rossi, S.E.; Rossi, I.; Viswanathan, C.; Bruzzi, J.F.; Marom, E.M.; Erasmus, J.J. Update in the Evaluation of the Solitary Pulmonary Nodule. RadioGraphics 2014, 34, 1658–1679. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  186. Stark, D.; Federle, M.; Goodman, P.; Podrasky, A.; Webb, W. Differentiating Lung Abscess and Empyema: Radiography and Computed Tomography. Am. J. Roentgenol. 1983, 141, 163–167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  187. Inchaustegui, C.A.; Wang, K.Y.; Teniola, O.; de Rosen, V.L. Large Septic Pulmonary Embolus Complicating Streptococcus Mutans Pulmonary Valve Endocarditis. J. Radiol. Case Rep. 2018, 12, 18–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  188. Watanabe, T.; Yokoe, M.; Noguchi, Y. Septic Pulmonary Embolism Associated with Periodontal Disease: A Case Report and Literature Review. BMC Infect. Dis. 2019, 19, 74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  189. Baidya, A.; Ganakumar, V.; Jadon, R.S.; Ranjan, P.; Manchanda, S.; Sood, R. Septic Pulmonary Emboli as a Complication of Peripheral Venous Cannula Insertion. Drug Discov. Ther. 2018, 12, 111–113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  190. Sui, X.; Huang, Y.; Song, W.; Zheng, F.; Wang, X.; Xu, X.; Wang, Z.; Jiang, J.; Jin, Z. Clinical Features of Pulmonary Cryptococcosis in Thin-Section CT in Immunocompetent and Non-AIDS Immunocompromised Patients. Radiol. Med. 2020, 125, 31–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  191. Li, J.; Li, C.; Li, J. Thoracic Manifestation of Wegener’s Granulomatosis: Computed Tomography Findings and Analysis of Misdiagnosis. Exp. Ther. Med. 2018, 16, 413–419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  192. Martinez, F.; Chung, J.H.; Digumarthy, S.R.; Kanne, J.P.; Abbott, G.F.; Shepard, J.A.O.; Mark, E.J.; Sharma, A. Common and Uncommon Manifestations of Wegener Granulomatosis at Chest CT: Radiologic-Pathologic Correlation. Radiographics 2012, 32, 51–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  193. Ananthakrishnan, L.; Sharma, N.; Kanne, J.P. Wegener’s Granulomatosis in the Chest: High-Resolution CT Findings. Am. J. Roentgenol. 2009, 192, 676–682. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  194. Iwasaki, Y.; Nagata, K.; Nakanishi, M.; Natuhara, A.; Harada, H.; Kubota, Y.; Yokomura, I.; Hashimoto, S.; Nakagawa, M. Spiral CT Findings in Septic Pulmonary Emboli. Eur. J. Radiol. 2001, 37, 190–194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  195. Kui, N.A.; Templeton, P.A.; White, C.S.; Zu-Long, C.; You-Xian, B.; You-Quan, C. Evaluation of the Air Bronchogram Sign on CT in Solitary Pulmonary Lesions. J. Comput. Assist. Tomogr. 1996, 20, 983–986. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  196. Qiang, J.W.; Zhou, K.R.; Lu, G.; Wang, Q.; Ye, X.G.; Xu, S.T.; Tan, L.J. The Relationship between Solitary Pulmonary Nodules and Bronchi: Multi-Slice CT–Pathological Correlation. Clin. Radiol. 2004, 59, 1121–1127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  197. Kim, T.J.; Goo, J.M.; Lee, K.W.; Park, C.M.; Lee, H.J. Clinical, Pathological and Thin-Section CT Features of Persistent Multiple Ground-Glass Opacity Nodules: Comparison with Solitary Ground-Glass Opacity Nodule. Lung Cancer 2009, 64, 171–178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  198. Farooqi, A.O.; Cham, M.; Zhang, L.; Beasley, M.B.; Austin, J.H.M.; Miller, A.; Zulueta, J.J.; Roberts, H.; Enser, C.; Kao, S.-J.; et al. Lung Cancer Associated With Cystic Airspaces. Am. J. Roentgenol. 2012, 199, 781–786. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  199. Scholten, E.T.; Horeweg, N.; de Koning, H.J.; Vliegenthart, R.; Oudkerk, M.; Mali, W.P.T.M.; de Jong, P.A. Computed Tomographic Characteristics of Interval and Post Screen Carcinomas in Lung Cancer Screening. Eur. Radiol. 2015, 25, 81–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  200. Mascalchi, M.; Attinà, D.; Bertelli, E.; Falchini, M.; Vella, A.; Pegna, A.L.; Ambrosini, V.; Zompatori, M. Lung Cancer Associated With Cystic Airspaces. J. Comput. Assist. Tomogr. 2015, 39, 102–108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  201. Sheard, S.; Moser, J.; Sayer, C.; Stefanidis, K.; Devaraj, A.; Vlahos, I. Lung Cancers Associated with Cystic Airspaces: Underrecognized Features of Early Disease. Radiographics 2018, 38, 704–717. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  202. Gruden, J.F.; Naidich, D.P.; Machnicki, S.C.; Cohen, S.L.; Girvin, F.; Raoof, S. An Algorithmic Approach to the Interpretation of Diffuse Lung Disease on Chest CT Imaging: A Theory of Almost Everything. Chest 2020, 157, 612–635. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  203. Ajith Kumar, A.K.; Mantri, S.N. Lymphangitic Carcinomatosis; [Updated 2022 Sep 19]; StatPearls Publishing: St. Petersburg, FL, USA, 2023. Available online: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK560921/ (accessed on 2 June 2023).
  204. Cellina, M.; Gibelli, D.; Martinenghi, C.; Giardini, D.; Soresina, M.; Menozzi, A.; Oliva, G.; Carrafiello, G. Non-Contrast Magnetic Resonance Lymphography (NCMRL) in Cancer-Related Secondary Lymphedema: Acquisition Technique and Imaging Findings. Radiol. Med. 2021, 126, 1477–1486. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  205. Klimek, M. Pulmonary Lymphangitis Carcinomatosis: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Case Reports, 1970–2018. Postgrad. Med. 2019, 131, 309–318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  206. Bordonaro, V.; Ciancarella, P.; Ciliberti, P.; Curione, D.; Napolitano, C.; Santangelo, T.P.; Natali, G.L.; Rollo, M.; Guccione, P.; Pasquini, L.; et al. Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Lymphangiography in Pediatric Patients with Central Lymphatic System Disorders. Radiol. Med. 2021, 126, 737–743. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  207. Andreu, J.; Hidalgo, A.; Pallisa, E.; Majó, J.; Martinez-Rodriguez, M.; Cáceres, J. Septal Thickening: HRCT Findings and Differential Diagnosis. Curr. Probl. Diagn. Radiol. 2004, 33, 226–237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  208. Fusco, R.; Simonetti, I.; Ianniello, S.; Villanacci, A.; Grassi, F.; Dell’Aversana, F.; Grassi, R.; Cozzi, D.; Bicci, E.; Palumbo, P.; et al. Pulmonary Lymphangitis Poses a Major Challenge for Radiologists in an Oncological Setting during the COVID-19 Pandemic. J. Pers. Med. 2022, 12, 624. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  209. Silva, C.I.S.; Flint, J.D.; Levy, R.D.; Müller, N.L. Diffuse Lung Cysts in Lymphoid Interstitial Pneumonia. J. Thorac. Imag. 2006, 21, 241–244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  210. Zaveri, J.; La, Q.; Yarmish, G.; Neuman, J. More than Just Langerhans Cell Histiocytosis: A Radiologic Review of Histiocytic Disorders. Radiographics 2014, 34, 2008–2024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  211. Mendelson, D.S.; Wasserstein, M.P.; Desnick, R.J.; Glass, R.; Simpson, W.; Skloot, G.; Vanier, M.; Bembi, B.; Giugliani, R.; Mengel, E.; et al. Type B Niemann-Pick Disease: Findings at Chest Radiography, Thin-Section CT, and Pulmonary Function Testing. Radiology 2006, 238, 339–345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  212. Miller, B.H.; Rosado-de-Christenson, M.L.; McAdams, H.P.; Fishback, N.F. Thoracic Sarcoidosis: Radiologic-Pathologic Correlation. Radiographics 1995, 15, 421–437. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  213. Polverosi, R.; Russo, R.; Coran, A.; Battista, A.; Agostini, C.; Pomerri, F.; Giraudo, C. Typical and Atypical Pattern of Pulmonary Sarcoidosis at High-Resolution CT: Relation to Clinical Evolution and Therapeutic Procedures. Radiol. Med. 2014, 119, 384–392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  214. Schaefer-Prokop, C.; Prokop, M.; Fleischmann, D.; Herold, C. High-Resolution CT of Diffuse Interstitial Lung Disease: Key Findings in Common Disorders. Eur. Radiol. 2001, 11, 373–392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  215. Chong, S.; Lee, K.S.; Chung, M.J.; Han, J.; Kwon, O.J.; Kim, T.S. Pneumoconiosis: Comparison of Imaging and Pathologic Findings. RadioGraphics 2006, 26, 59–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  216. Georgiades, C.S.; Neyman, E.G.; Barish, M.A.; Fishman, E.K. Amyloidosis: Review and CT Manifestations. RadioGraphics 2004, 24, 405–416. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  217. Raghu, G.; Remy-Jardin, M.; Myers, J.L.; Richeldi, L.; Ryerson, C.J.; Lederer, D.J.; Behr, J.; Cottin, V.; Danoff, S.K.; Morell, F.; et al. Diagnosis of Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis. An Official ATS/ERS/JRS/ALAT Clinical Practice Guideline. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care 2018, 198, e44–e68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  218. Mueller-Mang, C.; Grosse, C.; Schmid, K.; Stiebellehner, L.; Bankier, A.A. What Every Radiologist Should Know about Idiopathic Interstitial Pneumonias. Radiographics 2007, 27, 595–615. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  219. Attili, A.K.; Kazerooni, E.A.; Gross, B.H.; Flaherty, K.R.; Myers, J.L.; Martinez, F.J. Smoking-Related Interstitial Lung Disease: Radiologic-Clinical-Pathologic Correlation. Radiographics 2008, 28, 1383–1396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  220. Yagihashi, K.; Huckleberry, J.; Colby, T.V.; Tazelaar, H.D.; Zach, J.; Sundaram, B.; Pipavath, S.; Schwarz, M.I.; Lynch, D.A.; (IPFnet), I.P.F.C.R.N. Radiologic–Pathologic Discordance in Biopsy-Proven Usual Interstitial Pneumonia. Eur. Respir. J. 2016, 47, 1189–1197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  221. Rea, G.; Martino, M.D.; Capaccio, A.; Dolce, P.; Valente, T.; Castaldo, S.; Canora, A.; Lassandro, F.; Bocchino, M. Comparative Analysis of Density Histograms and Visual Scores in Incremental and Volumetric High-Resolution Computed Tomography of the Chest in Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis Patients. Radiol. Med. 2021, 126, 599–607. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  222. Lynch, D.A.; Austin, J.H.M.; Hogg, J.C.; Grenier, P.A.; Kauczor, H.U.; Bankier, A.A.; Barr, R.G.; Colby, T.V.; Galvin, J.R.; Gevenois, P.A.; et al. CT-Definable Subtypes of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: A Statement of the Fleischner Society1. Radiology 2015, 277, 192–205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  223. Bellardita, L.; Colciago, R.R.; Frasca, S.; Santis, M.C.D.; Gay, S.; Palorini, F.; Rocca, E.L.; Valdagni, R.; Rancati, T.; Lozza, L. Breast Cancer Patient Perspective on Opportunities and Challenges of a Genetic Test Aimed to Predict Radio-Induced Side Effects before Treatment: Analysis of the Italian Branch of the REQUITE Project. Radiol. Med. 2021, 126, 1366–1373. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  224. Borghetti, P.; Branz, J.; Volpi, G.; Pancera, S.; Buraschi, R.; Bianchi, L.N.C.; Bonù, M.L.; Greco, D.; Facheris, G.; Tomasi, C.; et al. Home-Based Pulmonary Rehabilitation in Patients Undergoing (Chemo)Radiation Therapy for Unresectable Lung Cancer: A Prospective Explorative Study. Radiol. Med. 2022, 127, 1322–1332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  225. Mega, S.; Fiore, M.; Carpenito, M.; Novembre, M.L.; Miele, M.; Trodella, L.E.; Grigioni, F.; Ippolito, E.; Ramella, S. Early GLS Changes Detection after Chemoradiation in Locally Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC). Radiol. Med. 2022, 127, 1355–1363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  226. Arslan, A.; Aktas, E.; Sengul, B.; Tekin, B. Dosimetric Evaluation of Left Ventricle and Left Anterior Descending Artery in Left Breast Radiotherapy. Radiol. Med. 2021, 126, 14–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  227. Choi, Y.W.; Munden, R.F.; Erasmus, J.J.; Park, K.J.; Chung, W.K.; Jeon, S.C.; Park, C.K. Effects of Radiation Therapy on the Lung: Radiologic Appearances and Differential Diagnosis. Radiographics 2004, 24, 985–997. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  228. Akira, M.; Ishikawa, H.; Yamamoto, S. Drug-Induced Pneumonitis: Thin-Section CT Findings in 60 Patients. Radiology 2002, 224, 852–860. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  229. Rossi, S.E.; Erasmus, J.J.; McAdams, H.P.; Sporn, T.A.; Goodman, P.C. Pulmonary Drug Toxicity: Radiologic and Pathologic Manifestations. Radiographics 2000, 20, 1245–1259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  230. Yoo, H.; Hino, T.; Han, J.; Franks, T.J.; Im, Y.; Hatabu, H.; Chung, M.P.; Lee, K.S. Connective Tissue Disease-Related Interstitial Lung Disease (CTD-ILD) and Interstitial Lung Abnormality (ILA): Evolving Concept of CT Findings, Pathology and Management. Eur. J. Radiol. Open 2021, 8, 100311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  231. Sverzellati, N.; Odone, A.; Silva, M.; Polverosi, R.; Florio, C.; Cardinale, L.; Cortese, G.; Addonisio, G.; Zompatori, M.; Dalpiaz, G.; et al. Structured Reporting for Fibrosing Lung Disease: A Model Shared by Radiologist and Pulmonologist. Radiol. Med. 2018, 123, 245–253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  232. Watadani, T.; Sakai, F.; Johkoh, T.; Noma, S.; Akira, M.; Fujimoto, K.; Bankier, A.A.; Lee, K.S.; Müller, N.L.; Song, J.W.; et al. Interobserver Variability in the CT Assessment of Honeycombing in the Lungs. Radiology 2013, 266, 936–944. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  233. Boitsios, G.; Bankier, A.A.; Eisenberg, R.L. Diffuse Pulmonary Nodules. Am. J. Roentgenol. 2010, 194, W354–W366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  234. Nakatsu, M.; Hatabu, H.; Morikawa, K.; Uematsu, H.; Ohno, Y.; Nishimura, K.; Nagai, S.; Izumi, T.; Konishi, J.; Itoh, H. Large Coalescent Parenchymal Nodules in Pulmonary Sarcoidosis: “Sarcoid Galaxy” Sign. Am. J. Roentgenol. 2002, 178, 1389–1393. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  235. Gruden, J.F.; Webb, W.R.; Warnock, M. Centrilobular Opacities in the Lung on High-Resolution CT: Diagnostic Considerations and Pathologic Correlation. Am. J. Roentgenol. 1994, 162, 569–574. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  236. Holt, R.M.; Schmidt, R.A.; Godwin, J.D.; Raghu, G. High Resolution CT in Respiratory Bronchiolitis-Associated Interstitial Lung Disease. J. Comput. Assist. Tomogr. 1993, 17, 46–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  237. Silva, C.I.S.; Churg, A.; Müller, N.L. Hypersensitivity Pneumonitis: Spectrum of High-Resolution CT and Pathologic Findings. Am. J. Roentgenol. 2007, 188, 334–344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  238. Hirschmann, J.V.; Pipavath, S.N.J.; Godwin, J.D. Hypersensitivity Pneumonitis: A Historical, Clinical, and Radiologic Review. Radiographics 2009, 29, 1921–1938. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  239. Rossi, S.E.; Franquet, T.; Volpacchio, M.; Giménez, A.; Aguilar, G. Tree-in-Bud Pattern at Thin-Section CT of the Lungs: Radiologic-Pathologic Overview. RadioGraphics 2005, 25, 789–801. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  240. Palmucci, S.; Inì, C.; Cosentino, S.; Fanzone, L.; Pietro, S.D.; Mari, A.D.; Galioto, F.; Tiralongo, F.; Vignigni, G.; Toscano, S.; et al. Pulmonary Vasculitides: A Radiological Review Emphasizing Parenchymal HRCT Features. Diagnostics 2021, 11, 2318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  241. Specks, U. Pulmonary Manifestations of Vasculitis. In Pulmonary Manifestations of Rheumatic Disease; Dellaripa, P., Fischer, A., Flaherty, K., Eds.; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 2014. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  242. Nachiappan, A.C.; Rahbar, K.; Shi, X.; Guy, E.S.; Barbosa, E.J.M.; Shroff, G.S.; Ocazionez, D.; Schlesinger, A.E.; Katz, S.I.; Hammer, M.M. Pulmonary Tuberculosis: Role of Radiology in Diagnosis and Management. Radiographics 2017, 37, 52–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  243. Miller, W.T.; Shah, R.M. Isolated Diffuse Ground-Glass Opacity in Thoracic CT: Causes and Clinical Presentations. Am. J. Roentgenol. 2005, 184, 613–622. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  244. Park, C.M.; Goo, J.M.; Lee, H.J.; Lee, C.H.; Chun, E.J.; Im, J.-G. Nodular Ground-Glass Opacity at Thin-Section CT: Histologic Correlation and Evaluation of Change at Follow-Up. RadioGraphics 2007, 27, 391–408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  245. Özel, M.; Aslan, A.; Araç, S. Use of the COVID-19 Reporting and Data System (CO-RADS) Classification and Chest Computed Tomography Involvement Score (CT-IS) in COVID-19 Pneumonia. Radiol. Med. 2021, 126, 679–687. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  246. Rizzo, S.; Catanese, C.; Puligheddu, C.; Epistolio, S.; Ramelli, G.; Frattini, M.; Mestre, R.P.; Nadarajah, N.; Rezzonico, E.; Magoga, F.; et al. CT Evaluation of Lung Infiltrates in the Two Months Preceding the Coronavirus Disease 19 Pandemic in Canton Ticino (Switzerland): Were There Suspicious Cases before the Official First Case? Radiol. Med. 2022, 127, 360–368. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  247. Cereser, L.; Girometti, R.; Re, J.D.; Marchesini, F.; Como, G.; Zuiani, C. Inter-Reader Agreement of High-Resolution Computed Tomography Findings in Patients with COVID-19 Pneumonia: A Multi-Reader Study. Radiol. Med. 2021, 126, 577–584. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  248. Gerasia, R.; Mamone, G.; Amato, S.; Cucchiara, A.; Gallo, G.S.; Tafaro, C.; Fiorello, G.; Caruso, C.; Miraglia, R. COVID-19 Safety Measures at the Radiology Unit of a Transplant Institute: The Non-COVID-19 Patient’s Confidence with Safety Procedures. Radiol. Med. 2022, 127, 426–432. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  249. Moroni, C.; Cozzi, D.; Albanesi, M.; Cavigli, E.; Bindi, A.; Luvarà, S.; Busoni, S.; Mazzoni, L.N.; Grifoni, S.; Nazerian, P.; et al. Chest X-Ray in the Emergency Department during COVID-19 Pandemic Descending Phase in Italy: Correlation with Patients’ Outcome. Radiol. Med. 2021, 126, 661–668. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  250. Novelli, F.; Pinelli, V.; Chiaffi, L.; Carletti, A.M.; Sivori, M.; Giannoni, U.; Chiesa, F.; Celi, A. Prognostic Significance of Peripheral Consolidations at Chest X-Ray in Severe COVID-19 Pneumonia. Radiol. Med. 2022, 127, 602–608. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  251. Gabelloni, M.; Faggioni, L.; Cioni, D.; Mendola, V.; Falaschi, Z.; Coppola, S.; Corradi, F.; Isirdi, A.; Brandi, N.; Coppola, F.; et al. Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation (ECMO) in COVID-19 Patients: A Pocket Guide for Radiologists. Radiol. Med. 2022, 127, 369–382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  252. Borghesi, A.; Golemi, S.; Scrimieri, A.; Nicosia, C.M.C.; Zigliani, A.; Farina, D.; Maroldi, R. Chest X-Ray versus Chest Computed Tomography for Outcome Prediction in Hospitalized Patients with COVID-19. Radiol. Med. 2022, 127, 305–308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  253. Pecoraro, M.; Cipollari, S.; Marchitelli, L.; Messina, E.; Monte, M.D.; Galea, N.; Ciardi, M.R.; Francone, M.; Catalano, C.; Panebianco, V. Cross-Sectional Analysis of Follow-up Chest MRI and Chest CT Scans in Patients Previously Affected by COVID-19. Radiol. Med. 2021, 126, 1273–1281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  254. Dalpiaz, G.; Gamberini, L.; Carnevale, A.; Spadaro, S.; Mazzoli, C.A.; Piciucchi, S.; Allegri, D.; Capozzi, C.; Neziri, E.; Bartolucci, M.; et al. Clinical Implications of Microvascular CT Scan Signs in COVID-19 Patients Requiring Invasive Mechanical Ventilation. Radiol. Med. 2022, 127, 162–173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  255. Esposito, A.; Palmisano, A.; Cao, R.; Rancoita, P.; Landoni, G.; Grippaldi, D.; Boccia, E.; Cosenza, M.; Messina, A.; Marca, S.L.; et al. Quantitative Assessment of Lung Involvement on Chest CT at Admission: Impact on Hypoxia and Outcome in COVID-19 Patients. Clin. Imaging 2021, 77, 194–201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  256. Kao, Y.S.; Lin, K.T. A Meta-Analysis of the Diagnostic Test Accuracy of CT-Based Radiomics for the Prediction of COVID-19 Severity. Radiol. Med. 2022, 127, 754–762. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  257. Cardobi, N.; Benetti, G.; Cardano, G.; Arena, C.; Micheletto, C.; Cavedon, C.; Montemezzi, S. CT Radiomic Models to Distinguish COVID-19 Pneumonia from Other Interstitial Pneumonias. Radiol. Med. 2021, 126, 1037–1043. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  258. Grassi, R.; Belfiore, M.P.; Montanelli, A.; Patelli, G.; Urraro, F.; Giacobbe, G.; Fusco, R.; Granata, V.; Petrillo, A.; Sacco, P.; et al. COVID-19 Pneumonia: Computer-Aided Quantification of Healthy Lung Parenchyma, Emphysema, Ground Glass and Consolidation on Chest Computed Tomography (CT). Radiol. Med. 2021, 126, 553–560. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  259. Salvatore, C.; Roberta, F.; Angela, D.L.; Cesare, P.; Alfredo, C.; Giuliano, G.; Giulio, L.; Giuliana, G.; Maria, R.G.; Paola, B.M.; et al. Clinical and Laboratory Data, Radiological Structured Report Findings and Quantitative Evaluation of Lung Involvement on Baseline Chest CT in COVID-19 Patients to Predict Prognosis. Radiol. Med. 2021, 126, 29–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  260. Neri, E.; Miele, V.; Coppola, F.; Grassi, R. Use of CT and Artificial Intelligence in Suspected or COVID-19 Positive Patients: Statement of the Italian Society of Medical and Interventional Radiology. Radiol. Med. 2020, 125, 505–508. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  261. Caruso, D.; Zerunian, M.; Polici, M.; Pucciarelli, F.; Guido, G.; Polidori, T.; Rucci, C.; Bracci, B.; Tremamunno, G.; Laghi, A. Diagnostic Performance of CT Lung Severity Score and Quantitative Chest CT for Stratification of COVID-19 Patients. Radiol. Med. 2022, 127, 309–317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  262. Caruso, D.; Polici, M.; Zerunian, M.; Pucciarelli, F.; Polidori, T.; Guido, G.; Rucci, C.; Bracci, B.; Muscogiuri, E.; Dominicis, C.D.; et al. Quantitative Chest CT Analysis in Discriminating COVID-19 from Non-COVID-19 Patients. Radiol. Med. 2021, 126, 243–249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  263. Masci, G.M.; Iafrate, F.; Ciccarelli, F.; Pambianchi, G.; Panebianco, V.; Pasculli, P.; Ciardi, M.R.; Mastroianni, C.M.; Ricci, P.; Catalano, C.; et al. Tocilizumab Effects in COVID-19 Pneumonia: Role of CT Texture Analysis in Quantitative Assessment of Response to Therapy. Radiol. Med. 2021, 126, 1170–1180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  264. Agarwal, M.; van der Pol, C.B.; Patlas, M.N.; Udare, A.; Chung, A.D.; Rubino, J. Optimizing the Radiologist Work Environment: Actionable Tips to Improve Workplace Satisfaction, Efficiency, and Minimize Burnout. Radiol. Med. 2021, 126, 1255–1257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  265. Palmisano, A.; Vignale, D.; Boccia, E.; Nonis, A.; Gnasso, C.; Leone, R.; Montagna, M.; Nicoletti, V.; Bianchi, A.G.; Brusamolino, S.; et al. AI-SCoRE (Artificial Intelligence-SARS CoV2 Risk Evaluation): A Fast, Objective and Fully Automated Platform to Predict the Outcome in COVID-19 Patients. Radiol. Med. 2022, 127, 960–972. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  266. Coppola, F.; Faggioni, L.; Regge, D.; Giovagnoni, A.; Golfieri, R.; Bibbolino, C.; Miele, V.; Neri, E.; Grassi, R. Artificial Intelligence: Radiologists’ Expectations and Opinions Gleaned from a Nationwide Online Survey. Radiol. Med. 2021, 126, 63–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  267. Caliandro, M.; Fabiana, G.; Surgo, A.; Carbonara, R.; Ciliberti, M.P.; Bonaparte, I.; Caputo, S.; Fiorentino, A. Impact on Mental Health of the COVID-19 Pandemic in a Radiation Oncology Department. Radiol. Med. 2022, 127, 220–224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  268. Francolini, G.; Desideri, I.; Stocchi, G.; Ciccone, L.P.; Salvestrini, V.; Garlatti, P.; Aquilano, M.; Greto, D.; Bonomo, P.; Meattini, I.; et al. Impact of COVID-19 on Workload Burden of a Complex Radiotherapy Facility. Radiol. Med. 2021, 126, 717–721. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  269. Cellini, F.; Franco, R.D.; Manfrida, S.; Borzillo, V.; Maranzano, E.; Pergolizzi, S.; Morganti, A.G.; Fusco, V.; Deodato, F.; Santarelli, M.; et al. Palliative Radiotherapy Indications during the COVID-19 Pandemic and in Future Complex Logistic Settings: The NORMALITY Model. Radiol. Med. 2021, 126, 1619–1656. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  270. Felice, F.D.; D’Angelo, E.; Ingargiola, R.; Iacovelli, N.A.; Alterio, D.; Franco, P.; Bonomo, P.; Merlotti, A.; Bacigalupo, A.; Maddalo, M.; et al. A Snapshot on Radiotherapy for Head and Neck Cancer Patients during the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Survey of the Italian Association of Radiotherapy and Clinical Oncology (AIRO) Head and Neck Working Group. Radiol. Med. 2021, 126, 343–347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  271. Lorut, C.; Ghossains, M.; Horellou, M.-H.; Achkar, A.; Fretault, J.; Laaban, J.-P. A Noninvasive Diagnostic Strategy Including Spiral Computed Tomography in Patients with Suspected Pulmonary Embolism. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care 2000, 162, 1413–1418. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  272. Mirabile, A.; Lucarelli, N.M.; Sollazzo, E.P.; Ianora, A.A.S.; Sardaro, A.; Mirabile, G.; Lorusso, F.; Racanelli, V.; Maggialetti, N.; Scardapane, A. CT Pulmonary Angiography Appropriateness in a Single Emergency Department: Does the Use of Revised Geneva Score Matter? Radiol. Med. 2021, 126, 1544–1552. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  273. Cozzi, D.; Moroni, C.; Cavigli, E.; Bindi, A.; Caviglioli, C.; Nazerian, P.; Vanni, S.; Miele, V.; Bartolucci, M. Prognostic Value of CT Pulmonary Angiography Parameters in Acute Pulmonary Embolism. Radiol. Med. 2021, 126, 1030–1036. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  274. Ierardi, A.M.; Gaibazzi, N.; Tuttolomondo, D.; Fusco, S.; Mura, V.L.; Peyvandi, F.; Aliberti, S.; Blasi, F.; Cozzi, D.; Carrafiello, G.; et al. Deep Vein Thrombosis in COVID-19 Patients in General Wards: Prevalence and Association with Clinical and Laboratory Variables. Radiol. Med. 2021, 126, 722–728. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  275. Ippolito, D.; Giandola, T.; Maino, C.; Pecorelli, A.; Capodaglio, C.; Ragusi, M.; Porta, M.; Gandola, D.; Masetto, A.; Drago, S.; et al. Acute Pulmonary Embolism in Hospitalized Patients with SARS-CoV-2-Related Pneumonia: Multicentric Experience from Italian Endemic Area. Radiol. Med. 2021, 126, 669–678. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  276. Masselli, G.; Almberger, M.; Tortora, A.; Capoccia, L.; Dolciami, M.; D’Aprile, M.R.; Valentini, C.; Avventurieri, G.; Bracci, S.; Ricci, P. Role of CT Angiography in Detecting Acute Pulmonary Embolism Associated with COVID-19 Pneumonia. Radiol. Med. 2021, 126, 1553–1560. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  277. Gul, M.H.; Htun, Z.M.; Perez, V.d.J.; Suleman, M.; Arshad, S.; Imran, M.; Vyasabattu, M.; Wood, J.P.; Anstead, M.; Morris, P.E. Predictors and Outcomes of Acute Pulmonary Embolism in COVID-19; Insights from US National COVID Cohort Collaborative. Respir. Res. 2023, 24, 59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  278. Lombardi, A.F.; Afsahi, A.M.; Gupta, A.; Gholamrezanezhad, A. Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome (SARS), Middle East Respiratory Syndrome (MERS), Influenza, and COVID-19, beyond the Lungs: A Review Article. Radiol. Med. 2021, 126, 561–569. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  279. Otrakji, A.; Digumarthy, S.R.; Gullo, R.L.; Flores, E.J.; Shepard, J.A.O.; Kalra, M.K. Dual-Energy CT: Spectrum of Thoracic Abnormalities. Radiographics 2016, 36, 38–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  280. Yang, L.; Sun, J.; Li, J.; Peng, Y. Dual-Energy Spectral CT Imaging of Pulmonary Embolism with Mycoplasma Pneumoniae Pneumonia in Children. Radiol. Med. 2022, 127, 154–161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  281. Sun, J.; Li, H.; Gao, J.; Li, J.; Li, M.; Zhou, Z.; Peng, Y. Performance Evaluation of a Deep Learning Image Reconstruction (DLIR) Algorithm in “Double Low” Chest CTA in Children: A Feasibility Study. Radiol. Med. 2021, 126, 1181–1188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  282. Gluecker, T.; Capasso, P.; Schnyder, P.; Gudinchet, F.; Schaller, M.-D.; Revelly, J.-P.; Chiolero, R.; Vock, P.; Wicky, S. Clinical and Radiologic Features of Pulmonary Edema. RadioGraphics 1999, 19, 1507–1531. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  283. Martínez-Martínez, M.U.; van Oostdam, D.A.H.; Abud-Mendoza, C. Diffuse Alveolar Hemorrhage in Autoimmune Diseases. Curr. Rheumatol. Rep. 2017, 19, 27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  284. Lara, A.R.; Schwarz, M.I. Diffuse Alveolar Hemorrhage. Chest 2010, 137, 1164–1171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  285. Hardak, E.; Brook, O.; Yigla, M. Radiological Features of Pneumocystis Jirovecii Pneumonia in Immunocompromised Patients with and without AIDS. Lung 2010, 188, 159–163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  286. Parekh, M.; Donuru, A.; Balasubramanya, R.; Kapur, S. Review of the Chest CT Differential Diagnosis of Ground-Glass Opacities in the COVID Era. Radiology 2020, 297, E289–E302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  287. King, M.A.; Pope-Harman, A.L.; Allen, J.N.; Christoforidis, G.A.; Christoforidis, A.J. Acute Eosinophilic Pneumonia: Radiologic and Clinical Features. Radiology 1997, 203, 715–719. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  288. Yeon, J.J.; Kim, K.I.; Im, J.S.; Chang, H.L.; Ki, N.L.; Ki, N.K.; Jeung, S.K.; Woon, J.K. Eosinophilic Lung Diseases: A Clinical, Radiologic, and Pathologic Overview. Radiographics 2007, 27, 617–637. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  289. Mochimaru, H.; Kawamoto, M.; Fukuda, Y.; Kudoh, S. Clinicopathological Differences between Acute and Chronic Eosinophilic Pneumonia. Respirology 2005, 10, 76–85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  290. Heyneman, L.E.; Ward, S.; Lynch, D.A.; Remy-Jardin, M.; Johkoh, T.; Müller, N.L. Respiratory Bronchiolitis, Respiratory Bronchiolitis-Associated Interstitial Lung Disease, and Desquamative Interstitial Pneumonia: Different Entities or Part of the Spectrum of the Same Disease Process? Am. J. Roentgenol. 1999, 173, 1617–1622. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  291. Frazier, A.A.; Franks, T.J.; Cooke, E.O.; Mohammed, T.L.H.; Pugatch, R.D.; Galvin, J.R. Pulmonary Alveolar Proteinosis. Radiographics 2008, 28, 883–899. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  292. Ioachimescu, O.C.; Kavuru, M.S. Pulmonary Alveolar Proteinosis. Chronic Respir. Dis. 2006, 3, 149–159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  293. Cozzi, D.; Bindi, A.; Cavigli, E.; Grosso, A.M.; Luvarà, S.; Morelli, N.; Moroni, C.; Piperio, R.; Miele, V.; Bartolucci, M. Exogenous Lipoid Pneumonia: When Radiologist Makes the Difference. Radiol. Med. 2021, 126, 22–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  294. Betancourt, S.L.; Martinez-Jimenez, S.; Rossi, S.E.; Truong, M.T.; Carrillo, J.; Erasmus, J.J. Lipoid Pneumonia: Spectrum of Clinical and Radiologic Manifestations. Am. J. Roentgenol. 2010, 194, 103–109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  295. Ahuja, J.; Kanne, J.P.; Meyer, C.A.; Pipavath, S.N.J.; Schmidt, R.A.; Swanson, J.O.; Godwin, J.D. Histiocytic Disorders of the Chest: Imaging Findings. Radiographics 2015, 35, 357–370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  296. Abbott, G.F.; Rosado-De-Christenson, M.L.; Frazier, A.A.; Franks, T.J.; Pugatch, R.D.; Galvin, J.R. Lymphangioleiomyomatosis: Radiologic-Pathologic Correlation. Radiographics 2005, 25, 803–828. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Squamocellular lung cancer vs. lung abscess. Axial CT scan (soft-tissue window) (a) and coronal view (lung window) (b) in a 70-year-old male patient with fever, cough, and chest pain for a few weeks, with laboratory tests showing infection, and unresponsive to first-line antibiotic therapy. The presence of inner air–fluid level, rim contrast enhancement, and clinical finding are suggestive for lung abscess. Axial CT scans (lung window) (c,d) in a 66-year-old male patient: the presence of air–fluid inner level may be indicative of lung abscess, but the absence of clinical evidence of infection, thick walls, ground-glass opacities in the surrounding pulmonary parenchyma, and small satellite pulmonary nodules are suggestive for squamocellular lung cancer.
Figure 1. Squamocellular lung cancer vs. lung abscess. Axial CT scan (soft-tissue window) (a) and coronal view (lung window) (b) in a 70-year-old male patient with fever, cough, and chest pain for a few weeks, with laboratory tests showing infection, and unresponsive to first-line antibiotic therapy. The presence of inner air–fluid level, rim contrast enhancement, and clinical finding are suggestive for lung abscess. Axial CT scans (lung window) (c,d) in a 66-year-old male patient: the presence of air–fluid inner level may be indicative of lung abscess, but the absence of clinical evidence of infection, thick walls, ground-glass opacities in the surrounding pulmonary parenchyma, and small satellite pulmonary nodules are suggestive for squamocellular lung cancer.
Tomography 09 00095 g001
Figure 2. Mediastinal neuroendocrine tumor (NET) vs. lung carcinoid. (ac) Mediastinal neuroendocrine tumor (NET). 40-year-old male patient with a sensation of chest weight and dyspnea. Contrast-enhanced axial CT scans (a) with coronal (b) and sagittal (c) reconstruction show a voluminous vascularized solid mass, markedly inhomogeneous for the presence of necrotic tissue, occupying most of the right hemithorax, probably originating from the anterior mediastinum; it determines dislocation, compression, and infiltration of the vascular structures of the mediastinum, thus like pleural planes. Ipsilateral pleural effusion and overlying pulmonary parenchyma atelectasis are associated. (df) Similar CT features are seen in a 44-year-old female. Contrast-enhanced CT (df): it shows a solid nodule in the right ilo-parahilar site of the middle lobe, with inhomogeneous post-contrastographic enhancement. This lesion appears in proximity to the lateral wall of the right atrium (without clear signs of infiltration). These characteristics are suspicious for malignant nature; the biopsy confirmed the diagnosis of typical pulmonary carcinoid.
Figure 2. Mediastinal neuroendocrine tumor (NET) vs. lung carcinoid. (ac) Mediastinal neuroendocrine tumor (NET). 40-year-old male patient with a sensation of chest weight and dyspnea. Contrast-enhanced axial CT scans (a) with coronal (b) and sagittal (c) reconstruction show a voluminous vascularized solid mass, markedly inhomogeneous for the presence of necrotic tissue, occupying most of the right hemithorax, probably originating from the anterior mediastinum; it determines dislocation, compression, and infiltration of the vascular structures of the mediastinum, thus like pleural planes. Ipsilateral pleural effusion and overlying pulmonary parenchyma atelectasis are associated. (df) Similar CT features are seen in a 44-year-old female. Contrast-enhanced CT (df): it shows a solid nodule in the right ilo-parahilar site of the middle lobe, with inhomogeneous post-contrastographic enhancement. This lesion appears in proximity to the lateral wall of the right atrium (without clear signs of infiltration). These characteristics are suspicious for malignant nature; the biopsy confirmed the diagnosis of typical pulmonary carcinoid.
Tomography 09 00095 g002
Figure 3. Pulmonary aspergillosis vs. cavitated metastases by squamous cell carcinoma of the tongue. Different cavitated lesions showing spiculated margins: pulmonary aspergillosis. Axial (a,b) and coronal (c) view of multiple solid cavitated nodules, with spiculated margins and peripheral ground glass (halo sign) in a 43-year-old neutropenic patient with follicular non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL), presenting with fever and cough. Cavitated metastases by squamous cell carcinoma of the tongue. Axial CT scans before (d,e) and after iodinated contrast medium administration (f) showing cavitated nodule in the paramediastinal site in a 67-year-old female patient with history of squamous cell carcinoma of the tongue.
Figure 3. Pulmonary aspergillosis vs. cavitated metastases by squamous cell carcinoma of the tongue. Different cavitated lesions showing spiculated margins: pulmonary aspergillosis. Axial (a,b) and coronal (c) view of multiple solid cavitated nodules, with spiculated margins and peripheral ground glass (halo sign) in a 43-year-old neutropenic patient with follicular non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL), presenting with fever and cough. Cavitated metastases by squamous cell carcinoma of the tongue. Axial CT scans before (d,e) and after iodinated contrast medium administration (f) showing cavitated nodule in the paramediastinal site in a 67-year-old female patient with history of squamous cell carcinoma of the tongue.
Tomography 09 00095 g003
Figure 4. Excavated nodules vs. septic emboli. Axial CT scans (lung window) in a 48-year-old male patient with asthenia, fever, and productive cough for several days (ac). It shows multiple solid nodules and micronodules with centrilobular distribution, with a “tree-in-bud” pattern, larger nodules, and some excavated lesions at the upper lobes and apices (tuberculosis). Axial CT scans (d,e) with coronal reconstruction (f) in a 54-year-old male patient presenting with fever and laboratory evidence of septic shock caused by the presence of infective endocarditis from Staphilococcus Aureus. Solid nodules, some with cavitation and peripheral ground glass, joined with the clinical data suggested the diagnosis of septic emboli.
Figure 4. Excavated nodules vs. septic emboli. Axial CT scans (lung window) in a 48-year-old male patient with asthenia, fever, and productive cough for several days (ac). It shows multiple solid nodules and micronodules with centrilobular distribution, with a “tree-in-bud” pattern, larger nodules, and some excavated lesions at the upper lobes and apices (tuberculosis). Axial CT scans (d,e) with coronal reconstruction (f) in a 54-year-old male patient presenting with fever and laboratory evidence of septic shock caused by the presence of infective endocarditis from Staphilococcus Aureus. Solid nodules, some with cavitation and peripheral ground glass, joined with the clinical data suggested the diagnosis of septic emboli.
Tomography 09 00095 g004
Table 1. International Thymic Malignancy Interest Group (ITMIG) classification of mediastinal compartments [9].
Table 1. International Thymic Malignancy Interest Group (ITMIG) classification of mediastinal compartments [9].
Compartment Boundaries Content PA Chest X-ray Sign
Prevascular (anterior)Anterior: posterior cortex of the sternum (mammary vessels excluded).
Posterior: anterior aspect of the pericardium.
Thymus, mediastinal fat, lymph nodes, the left brachiocephalic vein. Hilum overlay sign.
Anterior junction line not visible.
Preservation of the posterior mediastinal lines.
If located over the level of the clavicles: not sharp margins.
Visceral (middle)Anterior: posterior boundaries of the prevascular compartment.
Posterior: a plane 1 cm beyond the anterior aspect of the vertebral bodies.
Nonvascular: pericardium, trachea,
esophagus, lymph nodes.
Vascular: heart, superior vena cava, ascending and descending thoracic aorta, thoracic duct, and intra-pericardial pulmonary arteries.
Widening or obliteration of the right paratracheal stripe.
Widening of the aortopulmonary window.
Paravertebral (posterior)Anterior: posterior boundaries of the visceral compartment.
Posterolateral: a plane along the posterior margin of the chest wall at the lateral margin of the transverse processes.
Thoracic spine.
Paravertebral soft tissues.
Hilum overlay sign.
Deviation or disruption of the azygoesophageal line or paraspinal lines.
If located superior to the level of the aortic arch: the obliteration of the posterior junction line.
If located above the level of the clavicles: sharp margins.
Table 2. Mediastinal masses: differential diagnosis by location and attenuation.
Table 2. Mediastinal masses: differential diagnosis by location and attenuation.
Compartment Fat Attenuation Cystic Component Soft-Tissue-Enhancing Masses
Anterior
(prevascular)
(69.8%)
(8.4%):
Thymolipoma
Lipoma
Liposarcoma
Epicardial fat pad
Morgagni hernia
(24%):
Pericardial cyst
Cystic thymoma
Lymphangioma
Cystic teratoma
Thyroid goiter *
Thymoma (30.8%) *
Thymic carcinoma (7.5%) *
Lymphoma (14.4%)
Mature teratoma *
Thymic hyperplasia
Parathyroid adenomas *
Middle
(visceral)
(13.5%)
Bronchogenic cyst (16.8%) *Thyroid goiter (13%) *
Lymphadenopathy/metastasis (22.4%)
Esophageal cancer
Posterior
(paravertebral)
(5.4%)
Extramedullary hematopoiesis (13.9%):
Lateral meningocele
Pseudocyst
Neurogenic neoplasms (53.9%)
>1 compartment
(11.2%)
Liposarcoma
Lipomatosis
Lymphangioma Lymphadenopathy
Lung cancer
Legend. (*) the lesion may contain calcifications. The frequencies of the mediastinal lesions for each compartment (expressed in percentages and in bold) in the first column (i.e., “compartment”) refer to the total population included in Roden et al. [19]. The frequencies (expressed in percentages and in italics) of the most frequent lesion or lesion category in the second, third, and fourth columns (i.e., fat, cystic, or softtissue-enhancing masses) refer to the total lesions for each compartment (i.e., the row) in Roden et al. [19].
Table 3. General features of the likelihood of benignity or malignity of a solitary pulmonary nodule (SPN).
Table 3. General features of the likelihood of benignity or malignity of a solitary pulmonary nodule (SPN).
Benignity Malignancy
Size<6 mm >3 cm
Volume doubling time (VDT)VDT of <30 days or >400 days VDT between 30 and 400 days
MarginSmooth, rounded Irregular, lobulated, or spiculated
DensityFat
Calcification
(Central laminated, popcorn, and diffuse patterns of calcification)
Calcification
(Punctate, eccentric patterns of calcification)
Air (thin and regular walls, <5 mm) Air (thick, irregular walls, <15 mm)
ShapeRound lesions with smooth
margin
Irregular shape with spiculated or lobulated margin, pleural tags
Triangular lesions in subpleural
and perifissural locations
Polygonal, elongated, elliptical,
linear, or plaque-like shape
LocationPerifissural nodules, predominately represent perifissural lymph nodes Upper lobe distribution is associated with an increased risk of malignancy with an odds ratio of 1.9
Legend: VDT: volume doubling time. Period ranges are from reference [143].
Table 4. Differential diagnostic features for paraseptal emphysema and honeycombing.
Table 4. Differential diagnostic features for paraseptal emphysema and honeycombing.
Paraseptal Emphysema Honeycombing
LayersAlways one layer One or more layers
Wall ThicknessVery thin Thick
Associated findingsCentrilobular emphysema Traction bronchiectasis
DistributionUpper lobes Lower lobes
SizeLarge Small
Overall lung volumeIncreased Decreased
Associated reticulationAbsent Present
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Borgheresi, A.; Agostini, A.; Pierpaoli, L.; Bruno, A.; Valeri, T.; Danti, G.; Bicci, E.; Gabelloni, M.; De Muzio, F.; Brunese, M.C.; et al. Tips and Tricks in Thoracic Radiology for Beginners: A Findings-Based Approach. Tomography 2023, 9, 1153-1186. https://doi.org/10.3390/tomography9030095

AMA Style

Borgheresi A, Agostini A, Pierpaoli L, Bruno A, Valeri T, Danti G, Bicci E, Gabelloni M, De Muzio F, Brunese MC, et al. Tips and Tricks in Thoracic Radiology for Beginners: A Findings-Based Approach. Tomography. 2023; 9(3):1153-1186. https://doi.org/10.3390/tomography9030095

Chicago/Turabian Style

Borgheresi, Alessandra, Andrea Agostini, Luca Pierpaoli, Alessandra Bruno, Tommaso Valeri, Ginevra Danti, Eleonora Bicci, Michela Gabelloni, Federica De Muzio, Maria Chiara Brunese, and et al. 2023. "Tips and Tricks in Thoracic Radiology for Beginners: A Findings-Based Approach" Tomography 9, no. 3: 1153-1186. https://doi.org/10.3390/tomography9030095

APA Style

Borgheresi, A., Agostini, A., Pierpaoli, L., Bruno, A., Valeri, T., Danti, G., Bicci, E., Gabelloni, M., De Muzio, F., Brunese, M. C., Bruno, F., Palumbo, P., Fusco, R., Granata, V., Gandolfo, N., Miele, V., Barile, A., & Giovagnoni, A. (2023). Tips and Tricks in Thoracic Radiology for Beginners: A Findings-Based Approach. Tomography, 9(3), 1153-1186. https://doi.org/10.3390/tomography9030095

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop