Next Article in Journal
Initial Experience on Hyperpolarized [1-13C]Pyruvate MRI Multicenter Reproducibility—Are Multicenter Trials Feasible?
Previous Article in Journal
Whole-Body MRI-Derived Adipose Tissue Characterization and Relationship to Pulmonary Function Impairment
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Finite Element Modeling of Quantitative Ultrasound Analysis of the Surgical Margin of Breast Tumor

1
School for Engineering of Matter, Transport and Energy, Ira A. Fulton Schools of Engineering, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ 85281, USA
2
EnMed Department, Texas A&M College of Medicine, Houston, TX 77807, USA
3
Mayo Clinic in Arizona, Surgery, Phoenix, AZ 85054, USA
4
Survivability Engineering Branch, US Army Engineer Research and Development Center, Vicksburg, MS 39180, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Tomography 2022, 8(2), 570-584; https://doi.org/10.3390/tomography8020047
Submission received: 14 December 2021 / Revised: 19 February 2022 / Accepted: 23 February 2022 / Published: 1 March 2022
(This article belongs to the Section Cancer Imaging)

Abstract

Ultrasound is commonly used as an imaging tool in the medical sector. Compared to standard ultrasound imaging, quantitative ultrasound analysis can provide more details about a material microstructure. In this study, quantitative ultrasound analysis was conducted through computational modeling to detect various breast duct pathologies in the surgical margin tissue. Both pulse-echo and pitch-catch methods were evaluated for a high-frequency (22–41 MHz) ultrasound analysis. The computational surgical margin modeling was based on various conditions of breast ducts, such as normal duct, ductal hyperplasia, DCIS, and calcification. In each model, ultrasound pressure magnitude variation in the frequency spectrum was analyzed through peak density and mean-peak-to-valley distance (MPVD) values. Furthermore, the spectral patterns of all the margin models were compared to extract more pathology-based information. For the pitch-catch mode, only peak density provided a trend in relation to different duct pathologies. For the pulse-echo mode, only the MPVD was able to do that. From the spectral comparison, it was found that overall pressure magnitude, spectral variation, peak pressure magnitude, and corresponding frequency level provided helpful information to differentiate various pathologies in the surgical margin.
Keywords: quantitative ultrasound; finite element analysis; surgical margin; breast cancer; pulse-echo; pitch-catch; peak density; ductal carcinoma in situ quantitative ultrasound; finite element analysis; surgical margin; breast cancer; pulse-echo; pitch-catch; peak density; ductal carcinoma in situ
Graphical Abstract

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Paul, K.; Razmi, S.; Pockaj, B.A.; Ladani, L.; Stromer, J. Finite Element Modeling of Quantitative Ultrasound Analysis of the Surgical Margin of Breast Tumor. Tomography 2022, 8, 570-584. https://doi.org/10.3390/tomography8020047

AMA Style

Paul K, Razmi S, Pockaj BA, Ladani L, Stromer J. Finite Element Modeling of Quantitative Ultrasound Analysis of the Surgical Margin of Breast Tumor. Tomography. 2022; 8(2):570-584. https://doi.org/10.3390/tomography8020047

Chicago/Turabian Style

Paul, Koushik, Samuel Razmi, Barbara A. Pockaj, Leila Ladani, and Jeremy Stromer. 2022. "Finite Element Modeling of Quantitative Ultrasound Analysis of the Surgical Margin of Breast Tumor" Tomography 8, no. 2: 570-584. https://doi.org/10.3390/tomography8020047

APA Style

Paul, K., Razmi, S., Pockaj, B. A., Ladani, L., & Stromer, J. (2022). Finite Element Modeling of Quantitative Ultrasound Analysis of the Surgical Margin of Breast Tumor. Tomography, 8(2), 570-584. https://doi.org/10.3390/tomography8020047

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop