Next Article in Journal
A Hybrid CNN–LSTM–Attention Mechanism Model for Anomaly Detection in Lithium-Ion Batteries of Electric Bicycles
Previous Article in Journal
Comparative Techno-Economic and Life Cycle Assessment of Stationary Energy Storage Systems: Lithium-Ion, Lead-Acid, and Hydrogen
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
This is an early access version, the complete PDF, HTML, and XML versions will be available soon.
Review

Emerging Battery Technologies: The Main Aging Mechanisms and Challenges

1
Ampère Laboratory, UMR 5005 CNRS, Claude Bernard University Lyon 1, 69622 Villeurbanne, France
2
IMP Laboratory, UMR 5223 CNRS, Claude Bernard University Lyon 1, 69622 Villeurbanne, France
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Batteries 2025, 11(10), 383; https://doi.org/10.3390/batteries11100383
Submission received: 19 September 2025 / Revised: 15 October 2025 / Accepted: 16 October 2025 / Published: 20 October 2025

Abstract

New-generation batteries are attracting increasing interest in response to today’s energy storage challenges, as evidenced by the steady rise in scientific publications on the topic. However, their industrial deployment remains limited due to the complexity of aging mechanisms, which are still poorly understood and difficult to control. While several promising developments have emerged in laboratory settings, they remain too immature to be scaled up. These aging processes, which directly affect the performance, safety, and lifespan of battery systems, also determine their technical and economic viability. This review offers a comparative analysis of aging phenomena—both specific to individual technologies and common across systems—drawing on findings from accelerated testing, post-mortem analyses, and modeling. It highlights critical failures such as interface instability, loss of active material, and mechanical stress, while also identifying shared patterns and the unique features of each technology. By combining experimental data with theoretical approaches, the article proposes an integrated framework for understanding and prioritizing aging mechanisms by technology type. It underscores the limitations of current characterization techniques, the urgent need for harmonized testing protocols, and the importance of standardized data sharing. Finally, it outlines possible avenues for improving the understanding and mitigation of aging phenomena.
Keywords: next-generation batteries; aging mechanisms; material stability; electrode/electrolyte interface; a review next-generation batteries; aging mechanisms; material stability; electrode/electrolyte interface; a review

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Piat, C.; Sari, A.; Viton, C. Emerging Battery Technologies: The Main Aging Mechanisms and Challenges. Batteries 2025, 11, 383. https://doi.org/10.3390/batteries11100383

AMA Style

Piat C, Sari A, Viton C. Emerging Battery Technologies: The Main Aging Mechanisms and Challenges. Batteries. 2025; 11(10):383. https://doi.org/10.3390/batteries11100383

Chicago/Turabian Style

Piat, Corentin, Ali Sari, and Christophe Viton. 2025. "Emerging Battery Technologies: The Main Aging Mechanisms and Challenges" Batteries 11, no. 10: 383. https://doi.org/10.3390/batteries11100383

APA Style

Piat, C., Sari, A., & Viton, C. (2025). Emerging Battery Technologies: The Main Aging Mechanisms and Challenges. Batteries, 11(10), 383. https://doi.org/10.3390/batteries11100383

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop