Next Article in Journal
Impact of Pomegranate Extract Supplementation on Physical and Cognitive Function in Community-Dwelling Older Adults Aged 55–70 Years: A Randomised Double-Blind Clinical Trial
Previous Article in Journal
Tau Imaging: Use and Implementation in New Diagnostic and Therapeutic Paradigms for Alzheimer’s Disease
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Engaging Health and Aged Care Workers in Rural and Remote Australia Around Factors Impacting Their Access to and Participation in Dementia Training

Geriatrics 2025, 10(1), 28; https://doi.org/10.3390/geriatrics10010028
by Sandra C. Thompson 1,*, Jessica Valentine 2, Kira Gusterson 3, Katrina P. Fyfe 2,4, Alex Beilby 5,6, John A. Woods 2, Myles Clarkson Fletcher 7, Pascale Dettwiller 8 and Kathryn W. Fitzgerald 1
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2:
Geriatrics 2025, 10(1), 28; https://doi.org/10.3390/geriatrics10010028
Submission received: 8 January 2025 / Revised: 5 February 2025 / Accepted: 12 February 2025 / Published: 14 February 2025
(This article belongs to the Section Geriatric Public Health)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

Comments and Suggestions for Authors

I would strongly encourage you to make recommended revisions. It is an interesting and timely study.

Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Author Response

see file attached

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

Comments and Suggestions for Authors

The topic of dementia education for rural primary care and direct care staff is important.

The authors survey healthcare workers utilizing facilitated focus group roundtables.

The manuscript would be greatly improved by providing short tables: healthcare workers and disciplines, key issues, topics, and general outline of the roundtables and processes used.

The authors should describe how they collated the data from the focus groups and organized it into themes. A table of the major themes would also be helpful.

The narrative throughout the manuscript is very conversational. A more concise description of the results highlighted tables will help greatly to clarify both the results as well as the discussion.

As an implementation presentation, a table of lessons learned or implementation barriers would also be helpful.

The conclusion should be short with a concise listing of specific findings and recommendations for future iterations of the program.

Author Response

see attached response

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Round 2

Reviewer 2 Report

Comments and Suggestions for Authors

The authors are in substantial compliance with reviewer recommendations.

Back to TopTop