Abstract
Background: The systematic literature review with additional descriptive analysis at hand focuses on analysing returns management in e-commerce, which is an increasingly critical issue as the volume of online shopping is rising. Methods: Drawing from a comprehensive search of academic databases and a manual review of Google Scholar, 54 articles dating from 2007 onwards were collected and fully read. Results: The review reveals a main research effort emerging mainly from Germany and other countries, with a notable focus on fashion retail. The bulk of these studies aim to understand and reduce the frequency of customer returns, addressing a substantial operational challenge for online retailers. The findings provide multiple research streams extracted from the collected literature and combined to an overview. Conclusions: Through this, there are tendencies which can be interpreted to derive the evolution of the research field. The illustrated results in this review paint a detailed picture of the existing research landscape. This highlights the importance of ongoing research, which, e.g., holds potential benefits for customer satisfaction and environmental sustainability. The review also lists future research directions, recommending the continued investigation of areas such as predictive analytics and customer behaviour to further refine returns management practices.
1. Introduction
As a result of growing e-commerce, many companies have to deal with customers returning goods that they have purchased []. In the area of returns management, companies must then ensure that the returned items are registered and, if necessary, refurbished or repaired and stored back in the warehouse []. The decision on whether an item is kept and resold or destroyed depends on the condition and quality. Returns management plans, controls, and monitors all returned goods and provides an environmentally friendly return process for a customer as well as a minimal loss of value for the company []. In [], e.g., the authors analysed real shop data from an apparel e-tailer to examine the drivers of consumer returns and thus study returns management hypotheses based on real consumer returns. They also provide an example of e-tailers use sales stimuli to impact returns rates.
The article at hand faces the challenges of current literature reviews, including a lack of analysis on the up-to-date aspects of returns management. Additionally, there is a deficiency in country-specific studies to understand global and local dynamics in this field. Such aspects can be found as possible research proposals in [], which underline the necessity of the present review. Lastly, some articles may be limited or biased due to their selection of literature based on specific database choices in previous reviews. This study therefore intends to present a comprehensive picture of the current state of research in the field of returns management (RM) in e-commerce, formulating exploratory research questions that ensure a broad and inclusive perspective. The picture consists of a classification of relevant articles, a categorisation of the literature, an overview of the research, answers to the research questions in this study, the formulation of future research, and a final conclusion.
In this article, the structure is organised as follows. The methodology is discussed in Section 2, providing an overview of the research approach used. Section 3 delves into former literature reviews on returns management in e-commerce, covering topics such as reverse logistics (Section 3.1), closed-loop supply chains (Section 3.2), returns management in online retail (Section 3.3), and the necessity for conducting this literature analysis. Section 4 focuses on returns management tasks, followed by Section 5 which presents a descriptive analysis. Section 6 offers a literature analysis and overview, leading to Section 7, where a discussion takes place, with subsections on practical implications (Section 7.1) and future research in returns management in e-commerce (Section 7.2). The article concludes in Section 8, summarising the key findings and insights obtained throughout the study.
2. Methodology
As part of the research, an extensive systematic literature review with additional descriptive analysis was carried out in the fourth quarter of 2023. In order to outline and restrict the object investigation and to set a research focus, the following research questions (RQs) are formulated, which are to be answered through this review. The RQs are as follows:
- RQ1:
- How intensively is research being conducted in the area of returns management in e-commerce? Since when are there articles and surveys on returns management in the literature?
- RQ2:
- Which RM-tasks are differentiated and which tasks are primarily dealt with? Which solution approaches are proposed?
- RQ3:
- Which countries are performing the most research on returns management?
- RQ4:
- In which sectors of e-commerce is research being conducted?
- RQ5:
- What future research needs have been identified in the literature? What are therefore the future research perspectives in returns management?
By answering these RQs, we obtain precise information about the state of research on returns management in e-commerce and at the same time can discover research gaps within this discipline.
Drawing upon the recommendations of [], we thoroughly integrated the essential components of their steps (summarise, synthesise, conceptualise, and energise) into our research. During the “summarise step”, we differentiated our review by focusing on areas not covered in previous surveys and justified the scope and publication range selection. At the “synthesise step”, we interlinked findings from various studies to highlight the trends and contradictions, providing a coherent overview of the field. In the “conceptualize step”, we ensured that our thematic and conceptual framework was evident, manifesting in a structured approach to categorise existing knowledge and identify research gaps. To “energise”, we proposed future research agendas with specific inquiries and potential approaches, connecting the dots between current knowledge and future possibilities.
3. Former Literature Reviews on Returns Management in E-Commerce
In order to avoid overlaps with other studies and to emphasise the relevance of this work, it is first verified whether such a review already exists. We determined this by searching for comprehensive literature reviews as well as for articles that partially contain relevant literature reviews. Several noteworthy articles delve into the broader topic of returns and e-commerce, such as [], which emphasised the significance of lenient return policies and cash-on-delivery options in e-commerce contexts, especially in developing countries like Jordan. Additionally, [] investigated how lenient return policies, seller reputation, and customer-based signals like positive/negative comments on social networking sites influence perceived seller and product uncertainty in retail. These insights into the broader scope of returns now pave the way for a focused study of returns management specifically within e-commerce, offering a thorough analysis of the distinct challenges and tactics relevant to returns in online retail operations.
The procedure at this point can be assigned to the “summarise” and “synthesise steps”, as we initially examined previous literature reviews to acknowledge the necessity of our own, followed by the synthesis of our findings. By categorising the found reviews, we presented the key topics within the body of research we analysed. This strategy enabled us to not only highlight areas that had been previously neglected but also to interweave the results of various studies, thereby shedding light on trends and contrasts. Consequently, we created a coherent and comprehensive overview of the field, ensuring that both the summarising and synthesising steps were effectively undertaken.
For this purpose, a first systematic literature review was conducted to identify existing surveys. Based on the search terms from [], the terms “returns management” and “literature*” were searched for in combination (the wildcard “*” enables terms such as “literature research”, “literature analysis”, or “literature review”). The research carried out takes into account the English descriptions as well as the German translations (see Table 1).
Table 1.
Search results for literature reviews for RM in e-commerce.
Due to the low number of hits regarding reviews when using “e-commerce” in combination with the terms “returns management” and “literature*”, we concentrated on finding reviews on the topic of RM in general (regardless of the specification of e-commerce). This enabled us to find relevant research that we could then analyse with regard to the status quo. However, when using the general search terms in the standard search of the databases, many irrelevant hits were found. Thus, the terms were only searched for in the title, in the keywords, or in the abstract of an article (apart from in Google Scholar, where the differentiation is not possible).
Only publications that are available in full text and have been peer-reviewed were included. The search was performed on the basis of the following electronic databases: SpringerLink, ProQuest, ScienceDirect, Web Of Science, Scopus, EBSCO, EconBiz, JSTOR, and Google Scholar. An obstacle of the search was the use of the ScienceDirect database, which does not support the used wildcard, so the search terms were written out as listed above. The results of the reviews found are shown in Table 1.
Although Google Scholar could expand the search area and the unrestricted free access is another advantage in favour of its consideration, Google Scholar also has disadvantages. From the point of view of objectivity, replicability, and verifiability, it is problematic that Google Scholar users cannot replicate the finding of the indexed source references and that Google does not publicly document the search algorithm [].
The search resulted in a total of 28 surveys, which were analysed in detail. Articles that were not yet in print but already available online were also included. After a more detailed analysis of the search hits, nine literature reviews were removed that were not considered relevant for the present work, such as the empirical study by []. The remaining 19 reviews were then investigated further. The surveys found focused on the different aspects of RM. For example, some articles deal with the topic of reverse logistics, some with closed-loop supply chains, while others look at RM from a systematic perspective. In Section 3.1, Section 3.2 and Section 3.3, the 19 reviews are grouped and described with regard to their focus. Section 3.4 subsequently demonstrates why a separate literature review is necessary.
3.1. Reverse Logistics
In consideration of increased environmental awareness and heightened customer sensitivity, reverse logistics (RL) activities have received increased attention from academics and practitioners []. In the area of RL, the following sub-areas, in particular, are considered: product retrieval (collection, transport), product inspection, product recovery (direct, recycling, reprocessing, repair), inventory management, waste management, and reintegration into the forward supply chain. Thus, RM, which is covered in this review and specifically considers the registration, inspection, and refurbishment or disposal of returned items (see Section 1), can be seen as a component of RL. Sasikumar and Kannan [] describes the different sub-areas of the reverse supply chain and name the corresponding contributions with the tools and techniques for analysis and modelling. In [], a research framework for the field of reverse logistics is developed by categorising the found articles into six categories, i.e., recycling, remanufacturing, reuse, return policy, outsourcing, and others. For the articles, the methods used, the key issues, and the key findings are shown. Chan et al. [] dealt with the relationship and effect of just-in-time (JIT) and RL on each other. This study aims to analyse and understand the influences of JIT on RL. Overall, adapting RL to JIT principles can lead to more efficient processes and better cost control. Hazen et al. [] identified factors that should be considered when creating a strategic knowledge and decision support system for RL. The authors theorised that a company’s decision to engage RL is influenced by potential costs, potential profits, market conditions, customer behaviour, existing supply chain and production capacities, regulatory factors, and environmental effects. Given the increasing importance of RL as an essential component of supply chain management, a comprehensive bibliometric analysis of the academic literature on RL for the period from 1992 to 2015 is conducted in []. The study identifies the most influential publications with the respective number of citations. In addition, the contributions are summarised in five different periods to show the growing interest in RL. By taking co-citation analysis into account, the authors are able to present important research topics, knowledge groups, and future research opportunities. In [], a literature review on RL is provided for the years 2007–2016. The results indicate that the benefits achieved through RL management are primarily economic and environmental in nature. The article emphasises the importance of RL as a critical factor in modern retailing, particularly with regard to product and packaging returns and the promotion of social and environmental responsibility. The integration of RL into existing supply chains has led to complex optimisation problems, e.g., network design, location-allocation, vehicle routing, production or assembly/disassembly problems. Due to their difficulty, these problems often cannot be solved using exact methods or simulations. Instead, metaheuristics are utilised in the field of RL, which are given in []. The various papers are reviewed and organised based on the metaheuristic approaches used and in the context of RL problems.
3.2. Closed-Loop Supply Chains
A supply chain (SC) is traditionally defined by a forward flow of products and materials. By taking back products or their components, materials flow forwards and backwards in an SC []. A closed-loop supply chain utilises reverse logistics to reintroduce goods or materials that have fulfilled their purpose back into the logistics process. This can be seen in [], where RFID helps track products and provides information about their usability, increasing the collection rate of used products. Returned products then become part of the company’s product range through repair, reuse, or resale. In a closed-loop SC, all processes and actions of the forward and backward material flow are considered holistically. In [], the aspect of the profitable utilisation of returns in closed-loop supply chain management (SCM) is pursued. By dividing the process into five development phases, an overview of the progress made and future potential in operational research is provided. Borade and Bansod [] present in a comprehensive literature review the various aspects that need to be considered when managing a supply chain. They also include the aspects of RL. The authors highlight the necessity of SCM from an organisational point of view. The interaction between SCM and the Internet is the subject of []. In the study, the authors focus on defining, analysing, and describing e-SCM as well as identifying relevant factors that help practitioners achieve IT-enabled SCM. Furthermore, they explain how research in this area developed during the period 1995–2005 and point out some avenues for further research. Krapp and Kraus [] focused on coordination in closed-loop supply chains. In particular, the control of the reverse flow is considered, whereby three approaches are distinguished: (i) two or more independent supply chains exist, each optimising its own objective function; (ii) there is at least one reverse flow from a lower tier of the SC to a higher tier; and (iii) a mechanism to coordinate the flow along either the forward and/or the backward SC is investigated. The findings are used to derive which research gaps result from the respective state of research. Ritola et al. [] deals with the use of information associated with returns. The article conducts a systematic literature review and combines relevant research from different research streams related to information systems, knowledge management, organisational learning, and information sharing. Furthermore, Ritola et al. [] looked at SCM and returns from an information science perspective. The review identifies three important types of information: operational, product-related, and customer-related. In [], articles on returns acquisition, sorting, and disposition are analysed and recommendations are made for future research priorities that support the implementation of a circular economy.
3.3. Returns Management in Online Retail
In this subsection, we look specifically at returns management in online retail. Here, returns are no exception, but a recurring part of day-to-day business. Walsh et al. [] showed that a product returns management system (PRMS) is important for companies to both reduce the costs associated with returns and create a better shopping experience for customers. The authors combined insights from the literature with interviews with managers of large online retailers. The resulting framework considers three types of preventive instruments (i.e., monetary, procedure, and customer-based) that online retailers use to reduce return rates. Moreover, factors are identified that influence the relationship between the decision to implement a PRMS and the type of instruments chosen. In [], consumer behaviour in online retail is analysed in the context of order fulfilment. The aim of the study is three-fold: (i) To identify elements of order fulfilment that are relevant to online consumer behaviour (purchase, repurchase, product return); (ii) to establish an understanding of the relationship between order fulfilment, inventory management, last-mile delivery, returns management, and consumer behaviour; and (iii) to develop customer service strategies that take into account the link between behavioural responses and order fulfilment outcomes. The work in [] aimed to identify the key logistics research areas related to the adoption of e-commerce. For each area, key performance indicators that should be considered are then analysed with a particular focus on sustainable aspects. The presented methodological framework for e-commerce implementation summarizes five main research areas from a logistics perspective: supply chain network design, outbound logistics, reverse logistics, warehousing, as well as IT and data management. For each research area, input and output variables are identified and it is shown how they influence each other. The study by [] conducts a systematic literature review on returns in e-commerce. It is found that returns in e-commerce is a relatively new area of research, with various aspects being investigated. Further research is needed, in particular, on omni-channel returns management, customer satisfaction and service, as well as resources and technology in dealing with returns. The study offers a theoretical contribution by providing a conceptual framework for e-commerce returns management that can serve as a reference guide for efficient and competitive returns processes. The review by [] provides a summary of current developments in the field of returns and explores future research directions. The results show that research can be categorised into three main clusters: (i) operations management of product returns; (ii) retailer and (re-)manufacturer issues; and (iii) customer’s psychology, experience, and perception regarding marketing and sales. Potential future research directions discussed in the context of returns include digitalisation, globalisation versus localisation, more complex returns policies, understanding and predicting customer returns behaviour, and customer perception.
3.4. Necessity for Own Literature Analysis
By reviewing the existing literature reviews on returns management, the need for a further literature review becomes clear, despite some overlaps with previous works such as [,]. The previous survey papers and its results do not fully cover the specific aspects of the exploratory research questions that shall ensure a broad and inclusive perspective of the field. In particular, the following aspects should be mentioned: (i) some of the existing studies relate to periods far in the past, meaning that the most recent trends are not covered; (ii) the areas of returns management and e-commerce are sometimes insufficiently analysed or only analysed in a different context (e.g., not on the basis of tasks); (iii) country-specific analyses, which are important for understanding global or local dynamics, are often missing; (iv) previous research has different methodological limitations that affect compatibility (e.g., only qualitative methods are taken into account); and (v) the selection of databases in previous searches may have resulted in a limited or biased selection of literature.
To synthesise the existing reviews and to illustrate the necessity of this study, the existing reviews, which have previously been categorised, were sorted and visualised tabularly for a better overview. Towards this, Table 2 has a column “Research Synthesis”, where the essence of each review is captured. Furthermore, the table includes columns labelled RQ1–RQ5, each evaluating whether the article in question could potentially provide an answer to the corresponding research question. A value of 1 in any column, such as RQ2 = 1, indicates that the article may indeed address that research question, independently of the publication year. This approach makes it possible to clarify the degree to which the studies under consideration can potentially answer the five research questions (see Table 2).
Table 2.
Overview of existing reviews.
When assessing whether the articles have the potential to answer the research questions, we need to consider their currency, approach, focus, and consistency. The field of RM is characterised by rapid change and studies can quickly become outdated, e.g., through the recent history of disruptive changes in online consumer behaviour triggered by the COVID-19 pandemic. Methodological approaches in the literature vary: some rely on bibliometric analyses, while others use theoretical frameworks, each offering different types of insights and differing in their empirical basis. The focus of individual articles also has its limitations. For example, an article that focuses on the environmental aspects of reverse logistics may not address the economic impact or consumer behaviour aspects of returns management, thus only partially answering the research questions. In terms of consistency, the rigour with which the methods are applied and discussed can significantly affect the reliability and applicability of the results to RQs. Furthermore, answering the five questions on the basis of different studies is not desirable. Attempting to answer research questions using different studies may lead to inconsistent findings due to varied methodologies and conceptual definitions. Such an approach risks data fragmentation, making it challenging to draw reliable and coherent conclusions. Due to these limitations, there is no study that conclusively answers all five RQ, which underscores the need for a new, comprehensive review.
In the following a new, second search for articles (not literature reviews) was carried out. This can be seen in Figure 1, which visualises the two-phased literature review approach (first searching for existing reviews, then for relevant articles). It can be seen that the search follows the same basic procedure: determine and apply search terms, examine electronic databases for relevant literature, filter found literature from irrelevant studies, duplicates, or literature with restricted access, and finally processing the remaining reviews or articles.
Figure 1.
Searching and screening process.
Searching for relevant articles on RM, we initially found 74 articles exclusive to our search in Google Scholar. To guarantee a broader spectrum, we also integrated Google Scholar where we manually discovered 30 more articles by hand. After that, we removed 3 articles that were reviews and we removed 47 articles that were either duplicates or not available in full length. Finally, we received 54 relevant articles. These were read carefully, analysed, and categorised. The findings are presented in an overview in Section 5.
4. Returns Management Tasks
Returns are cost-intensive for companies, as the processing, handling, and transport costs are incurred and the returned products have lost value due to ageing, use, and technical changes. The tasks of returns management relate on the one hand to the prevention and avoidance of returns (before a return occurs) and on the other hand, to returns processing (when returns are received by the company). According to [,], who are widely acknowledged in the field of RM and whose categorisation is used in this study, returns management can therefore be summarised into two overall categories. The categories are preventive RM and curative RM. In addition, RM is defined by four RM-tasks, which are assigned to the categories. Curative RM includes only one task, whereas preventive RM includes three. In preventive RM, (1) returns prevention, (2) returns avoidance, and (3) returns promotion are taken into account. In curative RM, (4) effective returns processing is carried out (see Figure 2).
Figure 2.
Tasks of returns management [].
The tasks (1)–(4) can be defined as follows: (1) Implement measures that make returning items more difficult or prevent it altogether, such as return fees or requirements that discourage customers from sending products back. Incentives may also be offered to refrain from returning items. (2) Take proactive steps to address return causes, such as quality improvements and campaigns to encourage thoughtful purchasing, aiming to eliminate the root causes and reduce the incidence of returns. (3) Encourage the return of products with a positive net return value by informing customers of collection and recycling systems and offering incentives like credits or donation options to motivate product returns and enhance customer loyalty. (4) Focus on handling returned products to create value through a designed returns network and optimally repurpose the goods through resale, refurbishment, parts or materials recovery, donation or disposal.
Sorting the 54 publications found in our article search (see Section 3.4) according to the tasks of RM, a focus of part research areas becomes apparent. From the category of preventive RM, 24 articles deal with the task of returns avoidance, 13 with returns prevention, 5 with returns promotion. In the category of curative RM, only five articles address the returns processing. There are seven articles in the evaluation that could not be assigned to any task. The sorting shows a clear focus on the category of preventive RM; 77.8% of the studies can be assigned to this category. In contrast, only 9.3% of the studies are in the curative RM category (see Figure 3).
Figure 3.
Publications categorised by RM-tasks.
5. Descriptive Analysis
As part of our subsequent descriptive analysis, the 54 relevant articles (see Section 6) on the topic of returns management in e-commerce are analysed with regard to the aspects, which are adapted from []: (I) the development of the topic; (II) leading journals; (III) country affiliation of the authors; and (IV) research methodology. The aspects make the scientifical embedding of the topic clear, provide a more detailed insight, and help us answer our RQ1–RQ5. Our review starts by outlining the key characteristics of the studies to establish a clear context and ensure a transparent approach, setting the stage for a thorough analysis of the literature. Due to the fact that the articles cannot always be assigned precisely to one RM-task and one methodology, there may be slight overlaps in the studies with regard to categorisation. When categorising, we proceeded in such a way that we assigned the categories that are most likely to be represented in the work. This provides a clear picture of the subject area.
- (I)
- Development of the topic
The analysed articles cover the period from 2007 to 2023, although the year 2023 had not yet ended at the time of this analysis. The topic of “returns management” as such was addressed in 1995, [], the combination of “returns management” and “e-commerce” can only be found from 2007 onwards []. Since that year, at least one contribution on the topic is published almost every year, with an upward trend (see Figure 4).
Figure 4.
Publications per year on returns management in e-commerce.
- (II)
- Leading journals
All 54 articles found were published in a total of 42 different journals. The number of publications in the various journals is analysed in order to determine which of these journals is the leading journal. For this purpose, clusters are initially formed from 1 to 6, because at least 1 and a maximum of 6 articles were published in a journal. The clusters are thus formed by combining the journals with the same number of publications into one cluster, e.g., 36 journals each had 1 contribution on the topic (cluster 1), 4 journals each had 2 publications on the topic (cluster 2), and so on. The results of the distribution of the analysed publications and journals can be seen in Table 3.
Table 3.
Relation of journals and publications in quantities.
The table shows that 66.7% of the articles were published in different journals. Only four journals have two different contributions each. The remaining two journals comprised a total of 10 different publications on the topic and are therefore identified as the leading journals. Four publications were published in The International Journal of Logistics Management, and six publications were published in HMD Praxis der Wirtschaftsinformatik.
Both journals are therefore the leading journals. It should be mentioned at this point that the contributions in both journals have no linguistic overlap. In “The International Journal of Logistics Management”, only English-language articles were published, whereas in “HMD Praxis der Wirtschaftsinformatik” only German-language articles were published. Moreover, the authors of the articles are different.
- (III)
- Country affiliation of the authors
Adapted from the work of [], we visualise the authors’ countries and their interrelationships using the VOSviewer software. Due to the utilisation of databases not supported by the software, but which promise a considerable gain in knowledge, the geographical data must be extracted in another way. For this reason, the authors’ affiliations were read from the first page of the available publications. This procedure makes it possible to see where most of the publications come from and thus to draw conclusions about the countries in which the most research is being conducted on the topic. Table 4 lists the four countries from which the most contributions (at least four) originate.
Table 4.
Authors’ and country affiliations.
It can be seen that the majority of articles come from authors with affiliations to Germany (25), followed by authors with affiliations to the USA (14).
- (IV)
- Research methodologies
Adapting the categorisation of articles from [,], our 54 publications are divided into the methodologies “Empirical”, “Conceptual”, and “Modelling”. In this way, we obtain 32 empirical articles, 11 conceptual, and 11 modelling. Empirical studies in the field of returns management in e-commerce account for 59.3%, and conceptual and modelling studies for 20.4% each (see Figure 5).
Figure 5.
Distribution of research methods.
The empirical articles can be further subdivided into the categories “case study”, “secondary data analysis” (i.e., derived or processed data from a previous data collection), and “survey interview”. With 20 publications containing a survey interview, this is the leading category in the empirical context. The other two sub-categories each have 6 articles. This means that most empirical work is in the form of a survey interview (62.5%), followed by the other categories at 18.8% each.
6. Literature Analysis and Overview
In this section, the 54 evaluated articles on returns management are assigned to the RM-tasks and differentiated in terms of research methods. Also, the problem and solution methodology used in the studies are briefly described. The structure of the overview is such that all publications that have been categorised with the RM-task (1) returns prevention are listed first. This is followed by all studies with (2) returns avoidance, (3) returns promotion, and (4) effective returns processing. Finally, the articles that were not assigned to any task are mentioned. We distinguished between the methodologies conceptual (C), modelling (M), and empirical (E). In conceptional studies, concepts for the solution are described and discussed and no statistical analyses are conducted. Articles that perform basic calculations based on hypothetical data are also categorised here. Studies classified as “modelling” form conclusions based on a model (e.g., descriptive model, explanatory model, or decision model). Empirical studies (qualitative or quantitative) use one or more analytical methods, ranging from simple descriptive analysis to correlation, factor, cluster, regression or conjoint analysis and multivariate analysis. Lastly, the literature of each combination (e.g., (1) and (C)) is sorted by publication year in ascending order (see Table 5). This procedure ensured that the “conceptualise step” was also taken into account and applied.
Table 5.
Literature overview.
7. Discussion
This systematic literature review addresses the field of returns management in e-commerce. As part of this systematic literature review, 54 relevant articles were identified, which are presented and analysed. The research is based on five exploratory research questions that ensure a broad and inclusive perspective, which shed light on the subsequent aspects: Development of research within the field, distribution of research within RM-tasks, geographical focus of research, industry focus of practice-orientated research, and future research. By answering these research questions, we can develop a thorough and comprehensive understanding of the research landscape on returns management in e-commerce, encompassing development trends, task-specific distinctions, and geographic and industry nuances, ultimately serving as a guide for future academic and practitioner pursuits. In what follows, research questions RQ1–RQ5 posed at the beginning are answered individually and a final conclusion is drawn.
- RQ1:
- How intensively is research being conducted in the area of returns management in e-commerce? Since when are there articles and surveys on returns management in the literature?
Exploring RQ1, we observe a growing interest in returns management in e-commerce, starting from 2007 and gaining momentum (see Figure 4). This illustrates the growing importance of the field alongside with the rise of online shopping. If we also take a look at the number of articles on the different RM-tasks (see Figure 6), there is a recognisable uprising of the field in the scientific community, both in terms of number and the various RM-tasks.
Figure 6.
Published articles per year.
- RQ2:
- Which RM-tasks are differentiated and which tasks are primarily dealt with? Which solution approaches are proposed?
If we look at the spread of articles in relation to all RM-tasks (see Figure 3), we can see a clear focus on empirical studies, after which conceptual studies and then modelling methods are conducted. The most addressed task is (1) returns prevention (44.4%), followed by (2) returns avoidance (24.1%). This is followed by the contributions that fall thematically into the area “returns management in e-commerce” but cannot be assigned to any of the available tasks by definition (“no task” with 13.0%). The task of curative returns management, namely (4) effective returns processing and the task (3) returns promotion, have received the least attention to date with 9.3%.
- RQ3:
- Which countries are performing the most research on returns management?
Looking at RQ3, the review reveals that most of the articles come from authors who have affiliations in Germany, in the US, UK, and then China (see Table 4). The result is also supported by the fact that the leading journals for this field are “International Journal of Logistics Management” and “HMD Praxis der Wirtschaftsinformatik”.
- RQ4:
- In which sectors of e-commerce is research being conducted?
In order to answer the present research question, the sectors from the 54 studies were summarised and evaluated. The industries were first viewed individually and then summarised into the following five groups: fashion, electronics, home and living, media, and other. This approach shows that fashion is the most considered sector with 56.5%. The next largest sector is the electronics with 19.6%. This is then followed by the “other group” with 13.0%, which includes many small sectors such as animal products, office supplies, and motorbike equipment. Finally, home and living with 6.5% and media with 4.3% are the least considered sectors in the research area of returns management in e-commerce (see Figure 7).
Figure 7.
Sectors researched in returns management in e-commerce.
- RQ5:
- What future research needs have been identified in the literature? What are therefore the future research perspectives in returns management?
Finally, addressing RQ5, our review outlines potential areas for specific future studies and directions, emphasising, among others, the need for better data analysis and environmentally sustainable practices in returns management to reduce and avoid the amount of returns. Future directions also include developing intelligent systems for analysing returns, finding ways to encourage more eco-friendly return practices, and to understand the impact of these practices on both profits and the planet.
After answering the research questions, this section will also focus on the practical implications of the study (cf. Section 7.1) and identify future research directions in the area of RM in e-commerce (cf. Section 7.2).
7.1. Practical Implications
In this subsection, we explore the practical implications gathered from a synthesis of the 54 articles focusing on returns management in e-commerce. Through stringent criteria and methodological rigour, a comprehensive set of practical implications was identified, reflecting the complex nature of returns processing in online retail. Our goal is to extract actionable recommendations and strategic considerations from a variety of research studies to help online retailers efficiently handle returns, boost customer loyalty, and drive profitability. The practical implications discussed here cover a range of approaches, from utilising advanced data analysis for return trend prediction to promoting sustainable practices and strengthening customer relationships. After identifying individual practical implications, the next crucial step was to group these insights into coherent clusters. By establishing connections between related implications and identifying common themes, strategies, and implications, we aimed to create meaningful clusters. This restructuring process not only improved the presentation but also deepened the understanding of the principles governing returns management in e-commerce. Presenting these synthesised practical implications in a consolidated manner was intended to offer readers a comprehensive yet easy-to-understand summary of the key insights from various research articles. This approach enhances the accessibility and readability of the implications and equips stakeholders in the e-commerce sector with practical guidance for navigating returns processing effectively. It serves as a valuable resource for stakeholders, enabling informed decision making and strategic planning in the digital marketplace.
By implementing big data analytics and text mining for predictive returns modelling, online retailers can anticipate return patterns, enabling them to proactively address potential returns before they occur, thereby reducing return rates and associated costs. Developing preventive strategies using data analysis techniques allows e-commerce businesses to lower their handling costs without compromising customer satisfaction, ultimately leading to improved operational efficiency and financial savings. Additionally, utilising separate decision services and analysing transaction data helps in preventing return behaviour during the purchase process, enabling retailers to make informed decisions based on consumer insights and leading to a reduction in return incidents and enhanced forecasting accuracy. Providing correct information, extending cancellation periods, and meeting customer requirements contribute to improved reverse logistics and customer satisfaction, fostering trust and loyalty which can result in repeat business and positive word-of-mouth referrals. Strengthening customer relationships through effective returns management practices not only increases profitability but also enhances brand loyalty and customer lifetime value through personalised experiences and exceptional service. Furthermore, rewarding customers and studying their satisfaction levels enhances customer retention by incentivising them to keep purchased items, reducing return rates, and creating positive customer experiences that drive long-term engagement. Influencing customer behaviour through preventive and reactive measures helps in minimising returns and optimising revenue recognition by effectively managing return costs and maintaining a loyal customer base. Analysing the drivers of consumer returns, implementing circular sales and returns models, and using decision support systems streamline operations, leading to improved efficiency, reduced returns, and informed decision making throughout the returns process. Moreover, examining data analysis methods and return forecasting effectiveness enables retailers to optimise the returns management capacities efficiently, providing a strategic advantage in mitigating returns-related challenges and maximising profitability. Understanding the factors influencing return channel loyalty in omni-channel retailing aids retailers in enhancing customer loyalty and effectively managing perceived risks, resulting in increased customer retention and brand advocacy. Studying returns management practices with a focus on return policies, product categories, preventive actions, and sustainability leads to reduced returns, improved operational efficiency, and alignment with environmentally conscious consumer preferences. Lastly, enhancing customer satisfaction and loyalty through service recovery resilience builds trust with customers, especially in product replacement scenarios, by emphasising fairness and transparency in retail interactions, ensuring long-term customer relationships and loyalty.
7.2. Future Research in Returns Management in E-Commerce
In order to present an overview of the possible research perspectives for future studies on the topic of returns management in e-commerce, we also analysed the future research described in the 54 articles from this review and combined them into generalised perspectives. By doing this, we ensured that the fourth and final step “energise” from [] are taken into account and integrated. To do so, we started by grouping the articles with regard to the assigned RM-tasks. As previously explained, the categorisation of articles in terms of RM-tasks is not always clear or without overlaps, which is why a perspective may well fit into several categories. However, categorising the articles based on RM-tasks simplifies the review process, allows for more straightforward comparisons within each task area, and aids researchers and practitioners in efficiently finding literature pertinent to their specific interests in returns management. To reduce complexity, we have decided to only list each possible perspective once. The procedure makes it possible to present researchers or practitioners an organised and comparable overview of generalised future research perspectives that can be compared with one another. It is plausible that, by analysing the individual tasks research gaps within the respective task could be identified and targeted. To only consider the latest research streams, we mainly restricted the literature to the publication years 2019 and onwards. This approach, which focuses on predictive analytics, environmental considerations, and cost estimation, provides new momentum to returns management strategies and provides e-commerce with data-driven methods to optimise customer engagement and drive sustainable returns behaviour in a context-aware, commercially viable framework. For a better overview, each category is written in front of each task, e.g., preventive RM and (1) returns prevention.
Future research approaches for preventive RM and (1) returns prevention:
- Identify unique factors that demonstrate the link between the marketing efficiency of products and their returns.
- Conducting studies that examine the use of marketing instruments over time and across various market conditions and, based on this, develop strategies for retailers in relation to returns.
- Studies that segment customers according to their return behaviour and reasons for returns.
- Investigate why customers choose certain channels to return items and analyse whether channel choice can be encouraged by offering incentives and low-cost options.
- Examine how the type of a product and customer demographics (e.g., gender, age, education) affect product returns and customer loyalty in an omni-channel context.
Future research approaches for preventive RM and (2) returns avoidance:
- Create new scientific methodologies to measure the environmental effects of returns to support more sustainable business practices and the avoidance of product returns.
- Analyse the costs of returns (including handling costs, credit amounts, restocking fees, costs for different returns channels) for an e-commerce retailer to contextualise and differentiate returns avoidance strategies.
- Develop methodologies to assess the environmental footprints of online and brick-and-mortar shopping, aiming to inform and sensitise consumers about the ecological aspects.
- Focusing on techniques such as machine learning or deep learning to analyse more complex data structures and patterns to achieve accurate forecasting results using real-world data from companies from various sectors.
- Create helpful guidelines for researchers and practitioners to successfully apply predictive methods and develop individual models for various companies.
Future research approaches for preventive RM and (3) returns promotion:
- Conduct in-depth qualitative research to determine the motivations and values of customers who are encouraged and incentivised to return products.
- Advanced analyses of the economic and environmental potential of product returns.
- Studies analysing the impact of incentives for product returns on the return rate and customer satisfaction.
- Research the acceptance and implementation of sustainability practices in the area of product returns, especially in sectors like fashion or electronics.
- Conducting environmental and financial analyses comparing different return channels, laying the groundwork for an intelligent returns management system that guides customers towards the most sustainable option.
Future research approaches for curative RM and (4) effective returns processing:
- Conducting more studies on returns processing focussing on various sectors (furniture, fashion, office equipment etc.) in order to identify similarities and differences.
- Further development and refinement of prototypes and systems, e.g., those that classify incoming return packages according to the number of products.
- Developing advanced analytical methods using data from corporate ERP-systems and different data sources currently used for returns processing.
- Simulation studies to analyse the status of returns before, during, and after their occurrence in order to optimise the processing of returns in terms of resources.
- Examine how return experiences and any issues in the returns process contribute to bad feedback from customers, especially in the age of social media.
8. Conclusions
This systematic literature review illustrates the evolution and diversification of returns management in e-commerce. We observed the geographical development of research activities in this domain, particularly focusing on specific sectors and tasks within returns management. Our comprehensive analysis provides an in-depth understanding of the current landscape and highlights avenues for future research presented. The key findings of our systematic literature review shed light on the dynamic evolution of returns management in e-commerce. Our research reveals a surging interest in this field since 2007, as evidenced by the increasing number of articles dedicated to various aspects of returns management tasks. Notably, returns prevention emerges as a pivotal focus, underscoring the importance of strategies to mitigate returns in e-commerce operations. Our analysis also highlights the predominance of empirical studies, followed by conceptual analyses and modelling methods, showcasing the diverse approaches adopted within this domain. Furthermore, the geographical distribution of research shows contributions from countries such as Germany, the US, the UK, and China, reflecting a global interest in returns management practices. Sector-wise, our review underscores the significance of sectors like fashion and electronics, while also exploring additional industries like home and living, media, and miscellaneous categories in the context of returns management in e-commerce. Looking ahead, future research directions emphasise the need for enhanced data analysis, sustainable practices, and the development of intelligent systems to drive informed decision making and promote eco-friendly return processes that align with both economic and environmental sustainability goals. These key findings provide a comprehensive understanding of the research landscape in returns management, offering valuable insights for future academic and practical endeavours in this dynamic field. The methodology employed in this study for examining returns management in e-commerce is designed to offer a thorough and structured analysis of the subject. The research initially identified a need to explore current trends in returns management, leading to the formulation of specific research questions aimed at providing a broad and inclusive perspective. These questions focus on various aspects, such as the depth of research in returns management, the different tasks within returns management, the global distribution of research efforts, the sectors of e-commerce being studied, and the identification of future research needs. Following a systematic approach inspired by Ketchen’s research steps, the study integrated key components such as summarising existing literature, synthesising findings to reveal patterns, conceptualising a thematic framework, and proposing future research avenues. The methodology involved conducting a comprehensive search across numerous academic databases, filtering out irrelevant articles, and including only peer-reviewed publications for thorough examination. The study progresses through distinct sections to outline the methodological process and ensure a rigorous analysis and interpretation of the research findings. In essence, this methodological approach aims to provide a clear and detailed understanding of the current landscape of returns management in e-commerce. By addressing research gaps and outlining future research directions, the study endeavours to offer valuable insights that contribute to the advancement of knowledge in this dynamic field. This study acknowledges possible limitations. Our examination was confined to articles published either in English or German, potentially overlooking significant studies from major e-commerce markets published in other languages. Despite this, incorporating a broader linguistic range would have posed practical challenges due to the necessity of translating titles, abstracts, and keywords to ensure comprehensive search results. Additionally, a differentiated application of keywords across published works posed a challenge to the identification process as our confidence in predetermined search and exclusion criteria might not have secured all relevant literature. Limited access to subscription-based databases may have further constrained the breadth of literature included in the review. Despite these limitations, we aim to have provided a well-informed contribution to the research on returns management in e-commerce. Moving forward, we aspire to support future research endeavors with the insights gleaned from our study.
Funding
This research received no external funding.
Data Availability Statement
Not applicable.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
References
- Möhring, M.; Walsh, G.; Schmidt, R.; Koot, C.; Härting, R.C. Präventives Retourenmanagement im eCommerce. HMD Prax. Der Wirtsch. 2013, 50, 66–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Russo, I.; Marsogo, N. Searching for the right operations strategy to manage the repair process across the reverse supply chain. Sinergie Ital. J. Manag. 2019, 37, 17–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rogers, D.S.; Lambert, D.M.; Croxton, K.L.; García-Dastugue, S.J. The returns management process. Int. J. Logist. Manag. 2002, 13, 1–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Asdecker, B.; Karl, D.; Sucky, E. Examining drivers of consumer returns in e-tailing with real shop data. In Proceedings of the 50th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS 2017), Hilton Waikoloa Village, HI, USA, 3–6 January 2017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Karl, D. Forecasting e-commerce consumer returns: A systematic literature review. Manag. Rev. Q. 2024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ketchen, D.J.; Craighead, C.W. What constitutes an excellent literature review? Summarize, synthesize, conceptualize, and energize. J. Bus. Logist. 2023, 44, 164–169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Al-Adwan, A.S.; Al-Debei, M.M.; Dwivedi, Y.K. E-commerce in high uncertainty avoidance cultures: The driving forces of repurchase and word-of-mouth intentions. Technol. Soc. 2022, 71, 102083. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Al-Adwan, A.S.; Yaseen, H. Solving the product uncertainty hurdle in social commerce: The mediating of seller uncertainty. Int. J. Inf. Manag. Data Insights 2023, 3, 100169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Asdecker, B. Retourenmanagement - Eine Literaturrecherche. In Logistikmanagement: Herausforderungen, Chancen & Lösungen; Sucky, E., Asdecker, B., Dobhan, A., Haas, S., Wiese, J., Eds.; University of Bamberg Press: Bamberg, Germany, 2011; Volume 2, pp. 421–461. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jacsó, P. Google Scholar: The pros and the cons. Online Inf. Rev. 2005, 29, 208–214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cullinane, S.; Cullinane, K. The logistics of online clothing returns in Sweden and how to reduce its environmental impact. J. Serv. Sci. Manag. 2021, 14, 72–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, J.J.; Chen, H.; Rogers, D.S.; Ellram, L.M.; Grawe, S.J. A bibliometric analysis of reverse logistics research (1992–2015) and opportunities for future research. Int. J. Phys. Distrib. Logist. Manag. 2017, 47, 666–687. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sasikumar, P.; Kannan, G. Issues in reverse supply chain, part III: Classification and simple analysis. Int. J. Sustain. Eng. 2009, 2, 2–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Setaputra, R.; Mukhopadhyay, S.K. A framework for research in reverse logistics. Int. J. Logist. Syst. Manag. 2010, 7, 19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chan, H.K.; Yin, S.; Chan, F.T. Implementing just-in-time philosophy to reverse logistics systems: A review. Int. J. Prod. Res. 2010, 48, 6293–6313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hazen, B.; Rainer, R.K., Jr.; Hall, D. Decision support variables for reverse logistics. In Proceedings of the 16th Americas Conference on Information Systems (AMCIS 2010), Lima, Peru, 12–15 August 2010; Volume 113. [Google Scholar]
- Dias, K.T.S.; Braga, S.S.; Silva, D.; Satolo, E.G. Reverse logistics for return management in retail: A systematic literature review from 2007 to 2016. In New Global Perspectives on Industrial Engineering and Management; Mula, J., Barbastefano, R., Díaz-Madroñero, M., Poler, R., Eds.; Lecture Notes in Management and Industrial Engineering; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2019; pp. 145–153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rachih, H.; Mhada, F.Z.; Chiheb, R. Meta-heuristics for reverse logistics: A literature review and perspectives. Comput. Ind. Eng. 2019, 127, 45–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ding, L.; Wang, T.; Chan, P.W. Forward and reverse logistics for circular economy in construction: A systematic literature review. J. Clean. Prod. 2023, 388, 135981. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sarkar, B.; Guchhait, R. Ramification of information asymmetry on a green supply chain management with the cap-trade, service, and vendor-managed inventory strategies. Electron. Commer. Res. Appl. 2023, 60, 101274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Guide, V.D.R.; Wassenhove, L.N. Managing product returns for remanufacturing. Prod. Oper. Manag. 2001, 10, 142–155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Borade, A.B.; Bansod, S.V. Domain of supply chain management: A state of art. J. Technol. Manag. Innov. 2007, 2, 109–121. [Google Scholar]
- Giménez, C.; Lourenço, H.R. E-SCM: Internet’s impact on supply chain processes. Int. J. Logist. Manag. 2008, 19, 309–343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Krapp, M.; Kraus, J.B. Coordination contracts for reverse supply chains: A state-of-the-art review. J. Bus. Econ. 2019, 89, 747–792. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ritola, I.; Krikke, H.; Caniels, M. Creating value from returns by closing the information loop: A systematic literature review. In Proceedings of the 24th International Symposium on Logistics (ISL 2019), Nottingham, UK, 14–17 July 2019; pp. 739–748. [Google Scholar]
- Ritola, I.; Krikke, H.; Caniëls, M. Learning from returned products in a closed loop supply chain: A systematic literature review. Logistics 2020, 4, 7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gunasekara, L.; Robb, D.J.; Zhang, A. Used product acquisition, sorting and disposition for circular supply chains: Literature review and research directions. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 2023, 260, 108844. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Walsh, G.; Möhring, M.; Koot, C.; Schaarschmidt, M. Preventive product returns management systems: A review and a model. In Proceedings of the 22nd European Conference on Information Systems (ECIS 2014), Tel Aviv, Israel, 9–11 June 2014; Volume 22. [Google Scholar]
- Nguyen, D.H.; De Leeuw, S.; Dullaert, W.E. Consumer behaviour and order fulfilment in online retailing: A systematic review. Int. J. Manag. Rev. 2016, 20, 255–276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zennaro, I.; Finco, S.; Calzavara, M.; Persona, A. Implementing E-Commerce from Logistic Perspective: Literature Review and Methodological Framework. Sustainability 2022, 14, 911. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ahsan, K.; Rahman, S. A systematic review of e-tail product returns and an agenda for future research. Ind. Manag. Data Syst. 2022, 122, 137–166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Duong, Q.H.; Zhou, L.; Meng, M.; Nguyen, T.V.; Ieromonachou, P.; Nguyen, D.T. Understanding product returns: A systematic literature review using machine learning and bibliometric analysis. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 2022, 243, 108340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mollenkopf, D.A.; Rabinovich, E.; Laseter, T.M.; Boyer, K.K. Managing internet product returns: A focus on effective service operations. Decis. Sci. 2007, 38, 215–250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wowak, K.D.; Boone, C.A. So many recalls, so little research: A review of the literature and road map for future research. J. Supply Chain. Manag. 2015, 51, 54–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Walsh, G.; Koot, C.; Schmidt, R.; Möhring, M. Big Data: Neue Möglichkeiten im E-Commerce. Wirtsch. Manag. 2013, 5, 48–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yang, H. Returns reverse logistics management strategy in e-commerce B2C market. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Logistics Engineering, Management and Computer Science (LEMCS 2014), Shenyang, China, 24–26 May 2014. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Walsh, G.; Möhring, M. Retourenvermeidung im E-Commerce: Kann Big Data helfen? Marketing Review St. Gallen 2014, 31, 68–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Möhring, M.; Schmidt, R. Daten-getriebene Unternehmensarchitekturen im E-Commerce für das präventive Retourenmanagement. In Proceedings of the INFORMATIK 2015, Bonn, Germany, 28 September–2 October 2015; pp. 881–893. [Google Scholar]
- Lockhauserbäumer, V.; Mayr, C. Retourenabwicklung im B2C-E-Commerce. HMD Prax. Der Wirtsch. 2015, 52, 267–276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Deges, F. Retourencontrolling im Online-Handel. Controlling 2021, 33, 61–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Asdecker, B. Returning mail-order goods: Analyzing the relationship between the rate of returns and the associated costs. Logist. Res. 2015, 8, 3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Urbanke, P.; Kranz, J.; Kolbe, L.M. Predicting product returns in e-commerce: The contribution of Mahalanobis feature extraction. In Proceedings of the 36th International Conference on Interaction Sciences (ICIS 2015), Fort Worth, TX, USA, 13–16 December 2015. [Google Scholar]
- Heilig, L.; Hofer, J.; Lessmann, S.; Voß, S. Data-driven product returns prediction: A cloud-based ensemble selection approach. In Proceedings of the 24th European Conference on Information Systems (ECIS 2016), Istanbul, Turkey, 12–15 June 2016. [Google Scholar]
- Griffis, S.E.; Rao, S.; Goldsby, T.J.; Niranjan, T.T. The customer consequences of returns in online retailing: An empirical analysis. J. Oper. Manag. 2012, 30, 282–294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jeszka, A.M. Returns management in the supply chain. LogForum 2014, 10, 295–304. [Google Scholar]
- Möhring, M.; Walsh, G.; Schmidt, R.; Ulrich, C. Moderetouren im Deutschen Onlinehandel: Eine empirische Untersuchung. HMD Prax. Der Wirtsch. 2015, 52, 257–266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bernon, M.; Cullen, J.; Gorst, J. Online retail returns management: Integration within an omni-channel distribution context. Int. J. Phys. Distrib. Logist. Manag. 2016, 46, 584–605. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xu, X.; Jackson, J.E. Investigating the influential factors of return channel loyalty in omni-channel retailing. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 2019, 216, 118–132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lin, D.; Lee, C.K.M.; Siu, M.; Lau, H.; Choy, K.L. Analysis of customers’ return behaviour after online shopping in China using SEM. Ind. Manag. Data Syst. 2020, 120, 883–902. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Stöcker, B.; Baier, D.; Brand, B.M. New insights in online fashion retail returns from a customers’ perspective and their dynamics. J. Bus. Econ. 2021, 91, 1149–1187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rintamäki, T.; Spence, M.T.; Saarijärvi, H.; Joensuu, J.; Yrjölä, M. Customers’ perceptions of returning items purchased online: Planned versus unplanned product returners. Int. J. Phys. Distrib. Logist. Manag. 2021, 51, 403–422. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gaidarzhy, K.; Wozniak, T.; Schu, M. Managing product returns in Swiss online apparel retailing: A multiple case study approach. In Proceedings of the 51st Annual Conference of The European Marketing Academy (EMAC 2022), Budapest, Hungary, 24–27 May 2022. [Google Scholar]
- El Kihal, S.; Shehu, E. It’s not only what they buy, it’s also what they keep: Linking marketing instruments to product returns. J. Retail. 2022, 98, 558–571. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Asdecker, B.; Karl, D. Shedding some light on the reverse part of e-commerce: A systematic look into the black box of consumer returns in Germany. Eur. J. Manag. 2022, 22, 59–81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Frei, R.; Zhang, D.; Bayer, S.; Senyo, P.; Gerding, E.; Wills, G.; Beck, A. The impact of COVID-19 on product returns management in multichannel retail. SSRN Electron. J. 2023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gelbrich, K.; Gäthke, J.; Hübner, A. Rewarding customers who keep a product: How reinforcement affects customers’ product return decision in online retailing. Psychol. Mark. 2017, 34, 853–867. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Asdecker, B.; Karl, D. Big data analytics in returns management: Are complex techniques necessary to forecast consumer returns properly? In Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Advanced Research Methods and Analytics (CARMA 2018), València, Spain, 12–13 July 2018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Karl, D. Data Mining im Retourenmanagement: Evaluation von Retourenmengenprognosen anhand der Transaktionsdaten eines Schuh- und Bekleidungsversandhändlers. In Mobility in a Globalised World 2015; Sucky, E., Werner, J., Kolke, R., Biethahn, N., Eds.; University of Bamberg Press: Bamberg, Germany, 2018; pp. 190–213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Difrancesco, R.M.; Huchzermeier, A. Multichannel retail competition with product returns: Effects of restocking fee legislation. Electron. Commer. Res. Appl. 2020, 43, 100993. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shang, G.; McKie, E.C.; Ferguson, M.E.; Galbreth, M.R. Using transactions data to improve consumer returns forecasting. J. Oper. Manag. 2020, 66, 326–348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Russo, I.; Masorgo, N.; Gligor, D.M. Examining the impact of service recovery resilience in the context of product replacement: The roles of perceived procedural and interactional justice. Int. J. Phys. Distrib. Logist. Manag. 2022, 52, 638–672. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Brusch, M. Developments and classifications of online shopping behavior in Germany. Int. J. Cyber Soc. Educ. 2014, 7, 147–156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- De Araújo, A.C.; Matsuoka, E.M.; Ung, J.E.; Massote, A.; Sampaio, M. An exploratory study on the returns management process in an online retailer. Int. J. Logist. Res. Appl. 2018, 21, 345–362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dobroselskyi, M.; Madleňák, R.; Laitkep, D. Analysis of return logistics in e-commerce companies on the example of the Slovak Republic. Transp. Res. Procedia 2021, 55, 318–325. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Overstreet, R.E.; Morgan, T.R.; Laczniak, R.N.; Daugherty, P.J. Stemming the tide of increasing retail returns: Implications of targeted returns policies. J. Bus. Res. 2022, 151, 551–562. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Karlsson, S.; Oghazi, P.; Hellstrom, D.; Patel, P.C.; Papadopoulou, C.; Hjort, K. Retail returns management strategy: An alignment perspective. J. Innov. Knowl. 2023, 8, 100420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, D.; Frei, R.; Wills, G.; Gerding, E.; Bayer, S.; Senyo, P.K. Strategies and practices to reduce the ecological impact of product returns: An environmental sustainability framework for multichannel retail. Bus. Strategy Environ. 2023, 32, 4636–4661. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Martínez-López, F.J.; Li, Y.; Feng, C.; Liu, H.; López-López, D. Reducing ecommerce returns with return credits. Electron. Commer. Res. 2023, 23, 2011–2033. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Difrancesco, R.M.; Huchzermeier, A.; Schröder, D. Optimizing the return window for online fashion retailers with closed-loop refurbishment. Omega 2018, 78, 205–221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tanai, Y. Framework for stochastic returns management in a closed-loop supply chain. Int. J. Bus. Manag. Stud. 2022, 3, 1–14. [Google Scholar]
- Hjort, K.; Lantz, B.; Ericsson, D.; Gattorna, J. Customer segmentation based on buying and returning behaviour. Int. J. Phys. Distrib. Logist. Manag. 2013, 43, 852–865. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Stevenson, A.B.; Rieck, J. Digitale Transformation im Retoureneingang: Klassifikationsmodell zur Vorsortierung von Retourenpaketen. HMD Prax. Wirtsch. 2023, 60, 1253–1266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Weinfurtner, S.; Zellner, G.; Münch, S. Auswirkungen der Digitalisierung im Handel am Beispiel des Retourenprozesses. HMD Prax. Wirtsch. 2016, 53, 98–108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Stevenson, A.B.; Rieck, J. Optimierung der Prozesse im Retoureneingang: E-Commerce Case Study für den B2C-Bereich. HMD Prax. Wirtsch. 2022, 60, 132–143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Muir, W.A.; Griffis, S.E.; Whipple, J.M. A simulation model of multi-echelon retail inventory with cross-channel product returns. J. Bus. Logist. 2019, 40, 322–338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jiang, D.; Li, X.; Aneja, Y.; Wang, W.; Tian, P. Integrating order delivery and return operations for order fulfillment in an online retail environment. Comput. Oper. Res. 2022, 143, 105749. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Brusch, M.; Stüber, E. Trends in logistics in the German e-commerce and the particular relevance of managing product returns. LogForum 2013, 9, 293–300. [Google Scholar]
- Chen, H.; Daugherty, P.J.; Jones, A.L. Ensuring returns management software effectiveness through joint development orientation. Transp. J. 2016, 55, 1–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, H.; Anselmi, K.; Falasca, M.; Tian, Y. Measuring returns management orientation. Int. J. Logist. Manag. 2017, 28, 251–265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, H.; Genchev, S.E.; Willis, G.; Griffis, B. Returns management employee development: Antecedents and outcomes. Int. J. Logist. Manag. 2019, 30, 1016–1038. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Patale, P.V.; Zohair, M. A theoretical framework for evaluating returns management performance of online retailers using fuzzy analytic hierarchy process. J. Data Acquis. Process. 2023, 38, 971–984. [Google Scholar]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2024 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).